Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Soft Random Sampling: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.12727 v2 pith:SWQOD3HO submitted 2023-11-21 cs.LG cs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.CL
keywords datarandomsamplinganalysisconvergenceempiricalperformancerecognition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Soft random sampling (SRS) is a simple yet effective approach for efficient training of large-scale deep neural networks when dealing with massive data. SRS selects a subset uniformly at random with replacement from the full data set in each epoch. In this paper, we conduct a theoretical and empirical analysis of SRS. First, we analyze its sampling dynamics including data coverage and occupancy. Next, we investigate its convergence with non-convex objective functions and give the convergence rate. Finally, we provide its generalization performance. We empirically evaluate SRS for image recognition on CIFAR10 and automatic speech recognition on Librispeech and an in-house payload dataset to demonstrate its effectiveness. Compared to existing coreset-based data selection methods, SRS offers a better accuracy-efficiency trade-off. Especially on real-world industrial scale data sets, it is shown to be a powerful training strategy with significant speedup and competitive performance with almost no additional computing cost.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Do we need equivariant models for molecule generation?

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Rotation-augmented CNNs learn equivariance easily for denoising and prediction, but only large models keep generation outputs invariant to seed rotations, and their latent codes do not identify rotated molecules as th...

Pith tools