Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 63 references

Rule-VLN: Bridging Perception and Compliance via Semantic Reasoning and Geometric Rectification

T0 review · 3 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-07-12 · grok-4.5

Pith's one-line read A zero-shot plug-in that reads regulatory signs and replans detours can cut rule violations by nearly a fifth and lift navigation success without retraining the agent.

desk verdict Solid systems paper: first large hard-rule urban VLN benchmark plus a practical zero-shot compliance module; gains are real on the synthetic testbed but transfer to real signs is unproven. read the letter →

arxiv 2604.16993 v2 pith:SYPTGEY7 submitted 2026-04-18 cs.AI cs.CVcs.RO

classification cs.AIcs.CVcs.RO
keywords vision-and-languagenavigationrulecomplianceurbanzero-shotrectificationsemanticconstraintsembodiedAItrafficsignsmentalmap
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Vision-and-language navigation agents today treat success as reachability: if a path is geometrically open, they take it. In real cities that habit is unsafe, because roads can be legally forbidden even when they are physically clear. This paper builds Rule-VLN, a large urban street-view benchmark that injects 177 kinds of regulatory signs into thousands of nodes so that agents must obey “may I go?” constraints, not only “can I go?”. It then introduces SNRM, a training-free module that first grounds fine-grained signs with a coarse-to-fine vision-language pipeline and then prunes illegal edges and computes a detour on a local mental map. On the hardest settings the module sharply reduces constraint violations while recovering task completion, showing that existing agents can be made rule-aware without changing their original weights.

What carries the argument

SNRM (Semantic Navigation Rectification Module): a plug-and-play, training-free pipeline that (1) uses macro-micro visual prompts plus a rule-name knowledge bank to decide whether an intended action is safe, and (2) on conflict overrides the base policy with an epistemic mental map that prunes illegal edges and greedily replans a compliant detour.

What would settle it

Deploy the same frozen base agent plus SNRM on a real street-view route that contains genuine traffic signs never seen in the synthetic injection pipeline, and check whether constraint-violation rate falls and task completion rises by margins comparable to the reported Level-3 gains.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

State-of-the-art VLN agents fall into a goal-driven trap and ignore subtle regulatory signs; equipping them with a zero-shot Semantic Navigation Rectification Module that couples coarse-to-fine visual rule grounding with hard topological pruning and dynamic detour planning restores both safety and success on a new large-scale urban rule-compliance benchmark.

Load-bearing premise

The synthetic signs placed into panoramas must look and sit realistically enough that a vision-language model’s detections and the resulting hard-constraint detours will transfer to real city streets.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Existing pretrained VLN backbones can acquire hard rule compliance without any weight updates.
  • Rule-VLN supplies a progressive four-level curriculum that exposes how badly current models ignore regulatory geometry.
  • Treating semantic prohibitions as hard graph prunes, rather than soft costs, is necessary for safe urban navigation.
  • Macro-micro visual prompting plus a closed rule-name bank measurably reduces open-ended hallucination on small signs.
  • Event-triggered VLM calls keep most steps cheap while still delivering large safety gains when a constraint is nearby.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same hard-constraint mental-map pattern could extend beyond traffic signs to temporary construction barriers or indoor restricted zones.
  • Because the module is backbone-agnostic, future stronger VLMs can be swapped in without redesigning the navigator.
  • Curriculum density of injected rules suggests progressive safety data may be more useful for end-to-end training than uniform random constraints.
  • Even with event triggering, VLM latency remains the practical bottleneck for real-time robot deployment.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper introduces Rule-VLN, a large-scale outdoor VLN benchmark built on Touchdown that injects 177 regulatory categories into ~8k nodes of a 29k-node urban graph across four curriculum levels, so that edge traversability is conditioned on semantic rule compliance rather than pure geometry (Eq. 1). Constraints are synthesized via a Mask-Prioritized Semantic Injection (MPSI) pipeline (dual-mask DiT, panoramic projection, GMM CLIP filtering). The authors further propose SNRM, a training-free, plug-and-play module that couples coarse-to-fine VLM perception (DINO + macro-micro prompts + SigLIP + CoT) with an epistemic mental map for hard-constraint pruning and detour planning. On Loc4plan and FLAME, SNRM reduces CVR (up to 19.26 pp) and raises TC (up to 5.97 pp) while remaining backbone-agnostic; ablations, synthesis metrics, and efficiency numbers are reported.

Significance. If the results hold under realistic conditions, the work is a timely and useful step for embodied AI: it reframes outdoor VLN success from reachability to social compliance, supplies the first large urban rule-compliance curriculum with explicit action subspaces, and offers a zero-shot safety envelope that does not retrain the navigation backbone. Strengths include a clear problem formulation, multi-level curriculum construction, consistent gains across two architectures, component ablations (MMVP/KDRG/mental map), VLM variants, synthesis fidelity metrics (PSNR/SSIM/LPIPS/FID/CLIP), and latency/trigger-rate reporting. These make the contribution concrete and falsifiable within the synthetic setting.

major comments (3)
  1. All quantitative claims for SNRM (Tables 2–5, Fig. 5–6; abstract’s +5.97% TC / −19.26% CVR) are measured exclusively on MPSI-injected panoramas. Sec. 4.1 and the Limitations section acknowledge residual synthesis artifacts, equirectangular distortion, and viewpoint inconsistency across adjacent nodes. Without a real-street or real-sign transfer evaluation (or a controlled degradation study of sign scale/legibility/placement), it is unclear whether the coarse-to-fine VLM pipeline and hard pruning (Eq. 1) would yield comparable CVR/TC gains on authentic regulatory imagery. This is load-bearing for the claimed universality and real-world safety envelope.
  2. The mental-map detour (Eq. 4) and closed-loop trap rely on free parameters (critical radius, penalty λ, cosine threshold τ) and on dead-reckoning accuracy over Touchdown horizons. The manuscript does not report sensitivity of TC/CVR/SPL to these choices, nor quantify drift under longer detours. Given that Level-4 already forces substantial re-routing, a short sensitivity or failure-mode analysis is needed to support the claim that the epistemic map is a reliable geometric rectification mechanism rather than a tuned heuristic.
  3. Curriculum construction (Sec. 3.3) uses a criticality score aggregating degree, betweenness, path dependence, and path frequency, yet the relative weights and the resulting distribution of rule types (action-impacting vs. advisory) are not fully specified. Because Level-1–4 difficulty and the 60% action-impacting claim drive the narrative that Rule-VLN is a rigorous progressive testbed, the selection procedure should be made reproducible and checked for unintended bias toward easily detectable or easily detourable signs.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Rule-VLN and SNRM are empirical systems results measured on external metrics, not a derivation that reduces to its own inputs.

full rationale

The paper’s load-bearing claims are empirical: (i) SOTA VLN agents degrade under Rule-VLN’s injected constraints, and (ii) the training-free SNRM module reduces CVR and raises TC when plugged into frozen backbones (Tables 2–5, Fig. 5). TC, SPD, and SPL are standard external navigation metrics; CVR is a transparent normalization of observed violations by exposure (Eq. 5), not a quantity fitted then re-presented as a prediction. Graph pruning (Eq. 1) and the mental-map heuristic (Eq. 4) are design choices evaluated experimentally, not first-principles derivations. CityNav-Rules action subspaces and the 177-category knowledge bank are constructed inputs to the benchmark and to SNRM’s grounding stage; they are not later claimed as independent theoretical predictions. Self-citations (authors’ prior City-VLM / multi-domain work) appear only as related-work context and do not underwrite uniqueness, uniqueness theorems, or the reported deltas. MPSI quality is assessed with external fidelity metrics (PSNR/SSIM/LPIPS/FID/CLIP), not by circular self-definition. There is no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, no self-definitional loop, and no load-bearing self-citation chain. Score 0 is therefore appropriate.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 3 invented entities

The work is empirical systems research; its load-bearing premises are modeling choices and engineering thresholds rather than mathematical axioms. Free parameters are the hand-chosen radii, penalties, and GMM modes that control filtering and detour behavior. Invented entities are the named pipelines and data products required to state the claims.

free parameters (4)
  • GMM high-confidence mode threshold for CLIP score filtering
    Bimodal GMM (Eq. 3) adaptively prunes low-quality synthesized signs; the acceptance boundary is data-driven yet still a free modeling choice that directly affects which constraints enter the benchmark.
  • Critical radius and penalty λ for visited-node avoidance in mental-map heuristic
    Eq. 4 applies a severe penalty λ inside a critical radius of previously visited nodes; both values are chosen by the authors and control detour quality.
  • Cosine-similarity closed-loop trap threshold τ
    Visual memory buffer triggers forced correction when cos(current, start) > τ; τ is an unstated free threshold that affects recovery from drift.
  • Curriculum criticality-score weights (degree, betweenness, path dependence, frequency)
    Node selection for the four difficulty levels aggregates four topological metrics whose relative weights are not derived but chosen to produce the reported 31–91 % instruction-affect rates.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Edge traversability is a binary hard constraint given by the indicator of regulatory prohibitions in the corresponding visual slice (Eq. 1).
    Standard soft-cost social-navigation formulations are replaced by a strict prune; the claim that this models real urban rules is an unproved modeling choice.
  • domain assumption A frozen VLM (Qwen3-VL etc.) plus SigLIP retrieval against a 177-name bank yields reliable zero-shot rule grounding when given macro-micro visual prompts.
    SNRM’s safety token is trusted without fine-tuning; performance therefore inherits whatever failure modes the chosen VLMs exhibit on small, distorted signs.
  • ad hoc to paper Dead-reckoning updates of the 2-D mental map remain accurate enough for greedy detour planning over the short horizons of Touchdown trajectories.
    No odometry noise model is supplied; the closed-loop trap detector is an engineering patch rather than a proven invariant.
invented entities (3)
  • Rule-VLN benchmark / CityNav-Rules dataset
    purpose: Provide the first large-scale urban graph with 177 hard regulatory categories and four curriculum levels.
    Constructed by the authors via MPSI injection into Touchdown; no independent public existence prior to this paper.
  • MPSI (Mask-Prioritized Semantic Injection) pipeline
    purpose: Synthesize geometrically rectified, semantically legible traffic signs into equirectangular panoramas.
    Dual-mask DiT conditioning + GMM filter is introduced here; fidelity numbers are self-reported.
  • SNRM (Semantic Navigation Rectification Module) with Epistemic Mental Map
    purpose: Zero-shot perception-to-detour wrapper that turns any frozen VLN policy into a rule-compliant agent.
    Macro-micro prompting + local 2-D topology are novel combinations defined in this work.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Rule-VLN: Bridging Perception and Compliance via Semantic Reasoning and Geometric Rectification." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SYPTGEY7

@misc{pith2026260416993,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Rule-VLN: Bridging Perception and Compliance via Semantic Reasoning and Geometric Rectification},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SYPTGEY7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2604.16993}
}
read the original abstract

As embodied AI transitions to real-world deployment, the success of the Vision-and-Language Navigation (VLN) task tends to evolve from mere reachability to social compliance. However, current agents suffer from a "goal-driven trap", prioritizing physical geometry ("can I go?") over semantic rules ("may I go?"), frequently overlooking subtle regulatory constraints. To bridge this gap, we establish Rule-VLN, the first large-scale urban benchmark for rule-compliant navigation. Spanning a massive 29k-node environment, it injects 177 diverse regulatory categories into 8k constrained nodes across four curriculum levels, challenging agents with fine-grained visual and behavioral constraints. We further propose the Semantic Navigation Rectification Module (SNRM), a universal, zero-shot module designed to equip pre-trained agents with safety awareness. SNRM integrates a coarse-to-fine visual perception VLM framework with an epistemic mental map for dynamic detour planning. Experiments demonstrate that while Rule-VLN challenges state-of-the-art models, SNRM significantly restores navigation capabilities, reducing CVR by 19.26% and boosting TC by 5.97%.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.16993 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The Rule-VLN Paradigm. Left: Benchmark construction via MPSI pipeline by injecting semantic constraints into urban topologies. Right: Unlike standard agents (bottom) violating “No Entry” signs, our method (top) helps the agent detect prohibitions, prunes illegal actions, and executes compliant detours (green path). priors [30, 52]. Furthermore, the scarcity of diverse, safety-critical training data in existing datas… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Rule-VLN Construction Pipeline. (a) CityNav-Rules Dataset: Translates visual signals into permissible action constraints via LLM. (b) Benchmark Generation: Filters strategic nodes via topological metrics and injects constraints via MPSI to construct curriculum environments. LLM-Driven Discrete Action Mapping. To translate abstract rules into rigorous control constraints, we employ GPT-5 to map each visual category t… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. MPSI Pipeline. (a) Boundary extraction via Mroad and prior retrieval. (b) Synthesis via dual-mask￾conditioned DiT. (c) GMM-based filtering and stitching. Spatial Grounding and Rule Decoupling. We decouple regulatory signals into geometric shape S and semantic rule R. Given a target node v with permissible action subspace Avalid(v), we retrieve a semantically aligned instance (S, R) ∼ Dinsert. To ensure global qualit… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The SNRM Framework. (a) Illustrating the dual-stage perception mechanism for rule grounding. (b-c) showing the local mental map for trajectory correction. Dual-Stage Coarse-to-Fine Perception Framework. To reliably extract subtle regulatory cues from complex ob￾servati…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Performance metrics of SOTA models on the Rule-VLN benchmark. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Visualization results of our method and other baselines on navigation samples. Green arrows indicate strictly [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Quantitative evaluation of semantic alignment using CLIP scores. (a) Overall score distribution. (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Qualitative analysis of image inpainting results from MPSI, FLUX.1-Fill, and Google Nano Banana 2 across [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 16 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.07073 (2024)

    Agrawal, P., Antoniak, S., Hanna, E.B., Bout, B., Chaplot, D., Chudnovsky, J., Costa, D., De Monicault, B., Garg, S., Gervet, T., et al.: Pixtral 12b. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.07073 (2024)

  2. [2]

    nature406(6794), 378–382 (2000)

    Albert, R., Jeong, H., Barabási, A.L.: Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. nature406(6794), 378–382 (2000)

  3. [3]

    IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence47(7), 5130–5145 (2025).https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2024.3386695

    An, D., Wang, H., Wang, W., Wang, Z., Huang, Y., He, K., Wang, L.: Etpnav: Evolving topological planning for vision-language navigation in continuous envi- ronments. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence47(7), 5130–5145 (2025).https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2024.3386695

  4. [4]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.06757 (2018)

    Anderson, P., Chang, A., Chaplot, D.S., Dosovitskiy, A., Gupta, S., Koltun, V., Kosecka, J., Malik, J., Mottaghi, R., Savva, M., et al.: On evaluation of embodied navigation agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.06757 (2018)

  5. [5]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Anderson, P., Wu, Q., Teney, D., Bruce, J., Johnson, M., Sünderhauf, N., Reid, I., Gould, S., Van Den Hengel, A.: Vision-and-language navigation: Interpreting visually-grounded navigation instructions in real environments. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 3674–3683 (2018)

  6. [6]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.21631 (2025)

    Bai, S., Cai, Y., Chen, R., Chen, K., Chen, X., Cheng, Z., Deng, L., Ding, W., Gao, C., Ge, C., et al.: Qwen3-vl technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.21631 (2025)

  7. [7]

    Advances in neural information processing systems29(2016)

    Bellemare, M., Srinivasan, S., Ostrovski, G., Schaul, T., Saxton, D., Munos, R.: Unifying count-based exploration and intrinsic motivation. Advances in neural information processing systems29(2016)

  8. [8]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Chen, H., Suhr, A., Misra, D., Snavely, N., Artzi, Y.: Touchdown: Natural language navigation and spatial reasoning in visual street environments. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 12538–12547 (2019)

Show all 63 references
  1. [9]

    In: Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)

    Chen, J., Lin, B., Xu, R., Chai, Z., Liang, X., Wong, K.Y.: Mapgpt: Map-guided prompting with adaptive path planning for vision-and-language navigation. In: Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). pp. 979...

  2. [10]

    IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (2025)

    Chen, K., An, D., Huang, Y., Xu, R., Su, Y., Ling, Y., Reid, I., Wang, L.: Constraint- aware zero-shot vision-language navigation in continuous environments. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (2025)

  3. [11]

    Information Fusion122, 103198 (2025)

    Chen, S., Wu, Z., Zhang, K., Li, C., Zhang, B., Ma, F., Yu, F.R., Li, Q.: Exploring embodied multimodal large models: Development, datasets, and future directions. Information Fusion122, 103198 (2025)

  4. [12]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Chen, X., Huang, L., Liu, Y., Shen, Y., Zhao, D., Zhao, H.: Anydoor: Zero-shot object-level image customization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 6593–6602 (2024)

  5. [13]

    Artificial Intelligence Review (2026)

    Chowa, S.S., Alvi, R., Rahman, S.S., Rahman, M.A., Raiaan, M.A.K., Islam, M.R., Hussain, M., Azam, S.: From language to action: a review of large language models as autonomous agents and tool users. Artificial Intelligence Review (2026)

  6. [14]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.17161 (2025)

    Chu, T., Zhai, Y., Yang, J., Tong, S., Xie, S., Schuurmans, D., Le, Q.V., Levine, S., Ma, Y.: Sft memorizes, rl generalizes: A comparative study of foundation model post-training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.17161 (2025)

  7. [15]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.14229 (2025)

    Dong, Y., Wu, F., He, Q., Cheng, Z.Q., Li, H., Li, M., Cheng, Z., Zhou, Y., Sun, J., Dai, Q., et al.: Ha-vln 2.0: An open benchmark and leaderboard for human-aware Rule-VLN 17 navigation in discrete and continuous environments with dynamic multi-human interactions. arXiv prepr...

  8. [16]

    Sociometry pp

    Freeman, L.C.: A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry pp. 35–41 (1977)

  9. [17]

    Social networks 1(3), 215–239 (1978)

    Freeman, L.C.: Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social networks 1(3), 215–239 (1978)

  10. [18]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.10015 (2022)

    Gokhale, T., Palangi, H., Nushi, B., Vineet, V., Horvitz, E., Kamar, E., Baral, C., Yang, Y.: Benchmarking spatial relationships in text-to-image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.10015 (2022)

  11. [19]

    Computers in Industry168, 104268 (2025)

    Hamdani, R., Chihi, I.: Adaptive human-computer interaction for industry 5.0: A novel concept, with comprehensive review and empirical validation. Computers in Industry168, 104268 (2025)

  12. [20]

    Advances in neural information processing systems30(2017)

    Heusel, M., Ramsauer, H., Unterthiner, T., Nessler, B., Hochreiter, S.: Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium. Advances in neural information processing systems30(2017)

  13. [21]

    In: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia

    Hong, H., Wang, S., Huang, Z., Wu, Q., Liu, J.: Navigating beyond instructions: Vision-and-language navigation in obstructed environments. In: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia. pp. 7639–7648 (2024)

  14. [22]

    IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence47(5), 3563–3579 (2025)

    Huang, K., Duan, C., Sun, K., Xie, E., Li, Z., Liu, X.: T2i-compbench++: An enhanced and comprehensive benchmark for compositional text-to-image generation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence47(5), 3563–3579 (2025)

  15. [23]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Huang, Y., Xie, L., Wang, X., Yuan, Z., Cun, X., Ge, Y., Zhou, J., Dong, C., Huang, R., Zhang, R., et al.: Smartedit: Exploring complex instruction-based image editing with multimodal large language models. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Patt...

  16. [24]

    In: 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)

    Islam, C.M., Salman, S., Shams, M., Liu, X., Kumar, P.: Malicious path manipula- tions via exploitation of representation vulnerabilities of vision-language navigation systems. In: 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). pp. 13845–13852...

  17. [25]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.17267 (2024)

    Jeong, S., Kang, G.C., Kim, J., Zhang, B.T.: Zero-shot vision-and-language navigation with collision mitigation in continuous environment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.17267 (2024)

  18. [26]

    In: 2025 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV)

    Kang, W., Galim, K., Koo, H.I., Cho, N.I.: Counting guidance for high fidelity text-to-image synthesis. In: 2025 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV). pp. 899–908. IEEE (2025)

  19. [27]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.17298 (2025)

    Ke, F., Hsu, J., Cai, Z., Ma, Z., Zheng, X., Wu, X., Huang, S., Wang, W., Haghighi, P.D., Haffari, G., et al.: Explain before you answer: A survey on compositional visual reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.17298 (2025)

  20. [28]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.03834 (2025)

    Kim, J., Sim, J., Kim, W., Sycara, K., Nam, C.: Care: Enhancing safety of visual navigation through collision avoidance via repulsive estimation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.03834 (2025)

  21. [29]

    1 kontext: Flow match- ing for in-context image generation and editing in latent space

    Labs, B.F., Batifol, S., Blattmann, A., Boesel, F., Consul, S., Diagne, C., Dock- horn, T., English, J., English, Z., Esser, P., et al.: Flux. 1 kontext: Flow match- ing for in-context image generation and editing in latent space. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.15742 (2025)

  22. [30]

    In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

    Li, J., Padmakumar, A., Sukhatme, G., Bansal, M.: Vln-video: Utilizing driving videos for outdoor vision-and-language navigation. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. vol. 38, pp. 18517–18526 (2024) 18 J. Wen et al

  23. [31]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

    Li, Y., Tian, M., Lin, Z., Zhu, J., Zhu, D., Liu, H., Zhang, Y., Xiong, Z., Zhao, X.: Fine-grained evaluation of large vision-language models in autonomous driving. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). pp. 9431–9442 (October 2025)

  24. [32]

    io/blog/2024-01-30-llava-next/

    Liu, H., Li, C., Li, Y., Li, B., Zhang, Y., Shen, S., Lee, Y.J.: Llava-next: Improved reasoning, ocr, and world knowledge (January 2024),https://llava-vl.github. io/blog/2024-01-30-llava-next/

  25. [33]

    In: Proceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Multimedia

    Liu, S., Zhang, H., Qiao, Q., Wu, Q., Wang, P.: Vln-chenv: Vision-language naviga- tion in changeable environments. In: Proceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Multimedia. pp. 3798–3807 (2025)

  26. [34]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.08579 (2024)

    Liu, Y., Yao, F., Yue, Y., Xu, G., Sun, X., Fu, K.: Navagent: Multi-scale urban street view fusion for uav embodied vision-and-language navigation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.08579 (2024)

  27. [35]

    In: The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations (2025)

    Lu, R., Wang, R., Lyu, K., Jiang, X., Huang, G., Wang, M.: Towards understanding text hallucination of diffusion models via local generation bias. In: The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations (2025)

  28. [36]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision

    Peebles, W., Xie, S.: Scalable diffusion models with transformers. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision. pp. 4195–4205 (2023)

  29. [37]

    In: European Conference on Computer Vision

    Qiao, Y., Liu, Q., Liu, J., Liu, J., Wu, Q.: Llm as copilot for coarse-grained vision-and-language navigation. In: European Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 459–476. Springer (2024)

  30. [38]

    Schumann, R., Riezler, S.: Generating landmark navigation instructions from maps as a graph-to-text problem. In: Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (...

  31. [39]

    In: Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)

    Schumann, R., Riezler, S.: Analyzing generalization of vision and language naviga- tion to unseen outdoor areas. In: Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). pp. 7519–7532 (2022)

  32. [40]

    In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

    Schumann, R., Zhu, W., Feng, W., Fu, T.J., Riezler, S., Wang, W.Y.: Velma: Verbalization embodiment of llm agents for vision and language navigation in street view. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. vol. 38, pp. 18924–18933 (2024)

  33. [41]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters10(1), 508–515 (2024)

    Song, D., Liang, J., Payandeh, A., Raj, A.H., Xiao, X., Manocha, D.: Vlm-social- nav: Socially aware robot navigation through scoring using vision-language models. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters10(1), 508–515 (2024)

  34. [42]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.15009 (2025)

    Song, W., Jiang, H., Yang, Z., Quan, R., Yang, Y.: Insert anything: Image insertion via in-context editing in dit. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.15009 (2025)

  35. [43]

    In: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia

    Sun, P., Song, Y., Liu, X., Yang, X., Wang, Q., Li, T., Yang, Y., Chu, X.: 3d question answering for city scene understanding. In: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia. pp. 2156–2165 (2024)

  36. [44]

    In: Proceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Multimedia

    Sun, P., Song, Y., Zhu, X., Liu, X., Wang, Q., Liu, Y., Xia, C., Li, T., Yang, Y., Chu, X.: City-vlm: Towards multidomain perception scene understanding via multimodal incomplete learning. In: Proceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Multimedia. pp. 3448–3457 (2025)

  37. [45]

    Preprints (2026)

    Sun, P., Tang, S., Wen, J., Liang, Y., Yang, Y., Chu, X.: From terrain to space: A survey on multi-domain data lifecycle for urban embodied agents. Preprints (2026)

  38. [46]

    Sensors25(2), 364 (2025) Rule-VLN 19

    Sun, Y., Qiu, Y., Aoki, Y.: Dynamicvln: Incorporating dynamics into vision-and- language navigation scenarios. Sensors25(2), 364 (2025) Rule-VLN 19

  39. [47]

    In: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia

    Tian, H., Meng, J., Zheng, W.S., Li, Y.M., Yan, J., Zhang, Y.: Loc4plan: Locating before planning for outdoor vision and language navigation. In: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia. pp. 4073–4081 (2024)

  40. [48]

    5: Advancing open-source multimodal models in versatility, reasoning, and efficiency

    Wang, W., Gao, Z., Gu, L., Pu, H., Cui, L., Wei, X., Liu, Z., Jing, L., Ye, S., Shao, J., et al.: Internvl3. 5: Advancing open-source multimodal models in versatility, reasoning, and efficiency. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.18265 (2025)

  41. [49]

    IEEE transactions on image processing 13(4), 600–612 (2004)

    Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., Sheikh, H.R., Simoncelli, E.P.: Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE transactions on image processing 13(4), 600–612 (2004)

  42. [50]

    IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems (2025)

    Wei, Z., Lin, B., Nie, Y., Chen, J., Ma, S., Xu, H., Liang, X.: Unseen from seen: Rewriting observation-instruction using foundation models for augmenting vision- language navigation. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems (2025)

  43. [51]

    Wen, C., Liang, J., Yuan, S., Huang, H., Bethala, G.C.R., Liu, Y.S., Wang, M., Tzes, A., Fang, Y.: How secure are large language models (llms) for navigation in urban environments? (2025),https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.09546

  44. [52]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.15310 (2024)

    Wu, J., Zhang, Z., Xia, Y., Li, X., Xia, Z., Chang, A., Yu, T., Kim, S., Rossi, R.A., Zhang, R., et al.: Visual prompting in multimodal large language models: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.15310 (2024)

  45. [53]

    In: Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020

    Xiang, J., Wang, X., Wang, W.Y.: Learning to stop: A simple yet effective ap- proach to urban vision-language navigation. In: Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020. pp. 699–707 (2020)

  46. [54]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

    Xiao, R., Kim, S., Georgescu, M.I., Akata, Z., Alaniz, S.: Flair: Vlm with fine- grained language-informed image representations. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). pp. 24884–24894 (June 2025)

  47. [55]

    In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

    Xu, Y., Pan, Y., Liu, Z., Wang, H.: Flame: Learning to navigate with multimodal llm in urban environments. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. vol. 39, pp. 9005–9013 (2025)

  48. [56]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.10454 (2025)

    Yin, H., Wei, H., Xu, X., Guo, W., Zhou, J., Lu, J.: Gc-vln: Instruction as graph constraints for training-free vision-and-language navigation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.10454 (2025)

  49. [57]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters9(6), 4918–4925 (2024)

    Yue, L., Zhou, D., Xie, L., Zhang, F., Yan, Y., Yin, E.: Safe-vln: Collision avoidance for vision-and-language navigation of autonomous robots operating in continuous environments. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters9(6), 4918–4925 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2024.3387171

  50. [58]

    Robotics: Science and Systems (2024)

    Zhang, J., Wang, K., Xu, R., Zhou, G., Hong, Y., Fang, X., Wu, Q., Zhang, Z., Wang, H.: Navid: Video-based vlm plans the next step for vision-and-language navigation. Robotics: Science and Systems (2024)

  51. [59]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Zhang, R., Isola, P., Efros, A.A., Shechtman, E., Wang, O.: The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 586–595 (2018)

  52. [60]

    In: Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing

    Zhang, T., Wang, X., Li, L., Tai, Z., Chi, J., Tian, J., He, H., Wang, S.: Strict: Stress- test of rendering image containing text. In: Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. pp. 21148–21161 (2025)

  53. [61]

    In: Proceedings of the 2025 International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval

    Zhang, Z., Chen, M., Zhu, S., Han, T., Yu, Z.: Mmcnav: Mllm-empowered multi- agent collaboration for outdoor visual language navigation. In: Proceedings of the 2025 International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval. pp. 1767–1776 (2025)

  54. [62]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

    Zheng, D., Huang, S., Zhao, L., Zhong, Y., Wang, L.: Towards learning a generalist model for embodied navigation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). pp. 13624–13634 (June 2024) 20 J. Wen et al

  55. [63]

    In: European Confer- ence on Computer Vision

    Zhou, G., Hong, Y., Wang, Z., Wang, X.E., Wu, Q.: Navgpt-2: Unleashing naviga- tional reasoning capability for large vision-language models. In: European Confer- ence on Computer Vision. pp. 260–278. Springer (2024)

Pith tools

Reviewed July 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.