Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 65 references

NNLOCAL: completely local subtractions for color-singlet production in hadron collisions

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read NNLOCAL computes NNLO Higgs cross sections with completely local, analytically integrated subtraction terms and demonstrates explicit cancellation of all infrared poles.

desk verdict Honest proof-of-concept for a long-standing goal: public code and strong inclusive checks, but the scheme's definitions and analytic integrations are deferred, so the full claim still needs referee pressure and a differential cross-check. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.21028 v2 pith:SZ43KN73 submitted 2024-12-30 hep-ph hep-th

V. Del Duca , C. Duhr , L. Fekésházy , F. Guadagni , P. Mukherjee , G. Somogyi , F. Tramontano , S. Van Thurenhout This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phhep-th
keywords NNLOQCDcorrectionslocalsubtractionschemecolor-singletproductioninfraredsingularitiesHiggsbosonHEFTparton-levelMonteCarloanalyticcountertermintegration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper presents NNLOCAL, a proof-of-concept, publicly available Monte Carlo program that computes next-to-next-to-leading-order (NNLO) QCD corrections for color-singlet production in hadron collisions using a completely local subtraction scheme. It claims to be the first implementation of such a scheme at NNLO in which every counterterm is defined pointwise in phase space and every counterterm integral is performed analytically in dimensional regularization. The paper demonstrates the cancellation of all infrared poles by combining integrated counterterms with virtual contributions, and validates the code by reproducing the NNLO Higgs-boson production cross section in a gluon-only effective theory to sub-permille accuracy over a wide range of Higgs masses. The detailed definitions of the new initial-state momentum mappings and damping functions are deferred to upcoming publications, but the code itself fixes them and passes the checks.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the set of local subtraction terms constructed from QCD infrared factorization formulae in eqs. (2.16)-(2.32): each term is a singular function of the original double-real or real-virtual momenta that matches a specific soft or collinear limit, with overlapping limits handled by the inclusion-exclusion principle. The construction relies on five elementary momentum mappings (final-state single collinear, initial-state single collinear, final-state single soft, initial-state double collinear, and final-state double soft) and on damping functions that suppress spurious singularities; these give an exact factorization of phase space, eq. (2.33), so that every counterterm can be integrated analytically over the unresolved emissions. The integrated counterterms are organized into insertion operators acting on reduced cross sections by convolution, and their pole parts cancel against virtual and collinear-remnant poles in eq. (2.43).

What would settle it

Take a sequence of phase-space points approaching a double-soft or double-collinear limit with the technical cutoff removed, and monitor the ratio of the subtraction sum to the matrix element: if the subtractions are correct, the absolute deviation from 1 must tend to 0. The paper shows this for selected limits; a decisive test would scan all singular configurations listed in table 1, including initial-final triple-collinear and double-soft limits, and would also check that no spurious singularity appears at regular phase-space points where the damping functions act.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the completely local subtraction scheme previously developed for color-singlet initial states can be extended to hadron-hadron collisions and that this extension works for color-singlet production. The double-real, real-virtual and double-virtual contributions are each rendered finite by sums of subtraction terms that reproduce all single and double unresolved limits of the squared matrix elements point by point in phase space, and the integrated counterterms combine into insertion operators that cancel the explicit poles of the virtual contributions. The claimed cancellation is verified analytically for gluon-only Higgs production and demonstrated numerically: the total NNLO cross section agrees with an independent N3LO computation at the permille level, and the rapidity distribution is stable under variation of technical cutoffs. The authors state that the full definitions of the new subtraction terms and momentum mappings will be given in upcoming publications.

Load-bearing premise

The scheme assumes that the momentum mappings and damping functions that define the subtraction terms globally, whose explicit definitions are deferred to an upcoming paper, have no spurious singularities and reproduce all physical infrared limits exactly; if any of those definitions is wrong, the pointwise cancellation would fail even though the integrated cross sections might still appear to agree.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The NNLO cross section for Higgs production in gluon-only HEFT is reproduced to sub-permille accuracy for Higgs masses from 100 GeV to 2 TeV, validating the scheme against an independent N3LO code.
  • All epsilon poles cancel identically when integrated counterterms are combined with virtual matrix elements, so each of the three contributions in eq. (2.11) is separately finite and can be evaluated numerically in four dimensions.
  • Because the subtraction terms are local, the ratio of the subtraction sum to the matrix element tends to 1 in every unresolved limit, as shown for single soft, single collinear, triple-collinear and double-soft configurations.
  • The phase-space factorization of eq. (2.33) is exact, so the integrated counterterms are expressed in terms of polylogarithms of weight at most three, with weight-four contributions only at xa=xb=1, allowing stable numerical evaluation.
  • The same integrated counterterms apply beyond color-singlet production because they are built from universal infrared factorization, with additional subtraction terms needed for processes that have final-state singularities already at Born level.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the deferred definitions are correct, the same five elementary mappings and integrated insertion operators should transfer to other color-singlet processes, such as Drell-Yan production, by swapping the matrix elements; this is the paper's stated next step.
  • The paper's proof is limited to the fully gluonic channel, which has a non-trivial infrared structure; a decisive generalization would test the scheme with light-quark channels and mixed quark-gluon initial states.
  • The trimmed-mean treatment of misbinning is an observable-level mitigation rather than a cure; the underlying local subtraction still scatters weights across bin boundaries, so smoothness of distributions with fine binning is the real practical test.
  • The claim of being the first public implementation of a completely local analytic subtraction scheme at NNLO is contingent on the companion paper containing the full definitions; until then the code itself is the only public specification.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper presents NNLOCAL, a parton-level Monte Carlo program that implements an extension of the CoLoRFulNNLO local subtraction scheme to color-singlet production in hadron-hadron collisions. The authors construct local subtraction terms that regularize all single and double unresolved configurations of the double-real and real-virtual contributions, state that these terms have been integrated analytically to the required order in dimensional regularization, and show that the epsilon-poles cancel once the integrated counterterms are combined with the virtual matrix elements and collinear remnants. The scheme is implemented in a public Fortran code for Higgs production in gluon fusion in the HEFT approximation with no light quarks. The code is validated against the N3LO inclusive code n3loxs for the total cross section at six values of m_H, with sub-permille agreement, and the paper presents local-cancellation tests approaching each singular limit, cutoff-independence plateaus for the technical parameters s_min and Delta x_min, and a fully differential rapidity distribution with a misbinning-mitigation procedure based on alpha-trimmed means. The precise definitions of the subtraction terms and the details of the analytic integrations are deferred to upcoming publications.

Significance. If the scheme is correct, this is a substantial methodological advance: it would be the first public implementation of a completely local analytic subtraction scheme at NNLO for processes with initial-state hadrons, and its structure is argued to extend beyond color-singlet production. The paper ships several things that are genuinely checkable and that go beyond the inclusive result: the pole parts of all insertion operators are given explicitly in Appendix A.2, enabling the pole-cancellation check of eq. (2.43) to be reproduced against the known two-loop IR structure; the local convergence of the subtraction terms is demonstrated pointwise over 7 to 8 orders of magnitude in the approach to every unresolved limit (Figs. 1 and 2); and the total cross section is shown to be independent of the technical cutoffs over wide plateaus (Fig. 3). The validation against n3loxs is external in the sense that no parameter of the subtraction scheme is tuned to it, and the paper is transparent about the modifications made to n3loxs. The main reservation is evidential: the analytic integration, the momentum mappings underlying eq.

major comments (3)
  1. [Secs. 2.2-2.3, eqs. (2.16)-(2.33)] The load-bearing construction of the scheme is explicitly deferred. Section 2.2 states that the precise definitions of all subtraction terms, including the five elementary momentum mappings, the momentum fractions, and the damping functions introduced to avoid spurious singularities, will be spelled out in detail in an upcoming publication, and Sec. 2.3 refers the integration procedure to ref. [43] and future work. The central correctness conditions of the method are (i) that the momentum mappings realize the exact phase-space factorization of eq. (2.33) in every single and double unresolved configuration, and (ii) that the damping functions regulate the crossing-induced spurious singularities at regular interior points without altering the physical singular limits. Neither condition can be checked from the material in this paper. The pointwise tests in Figs. 1 and 2 verify convergence as physical limits are approached, but they do not probe regular interior points, where the spurious singularities are claimed to be neutralized only by the asserted damping functions. The cancellations specific to color-singlet production that shape eqs. (2.18) and (2.27), such as the complete cancellation of all soft-collinear type terms, are likewise stated with the proof postponed. Because these objects are the definition of the scheme, the manuscript as it stands is a strong numerical existence proof rather than a complete derivation of the method it announces.
  2. [Appendix A.2 and Sec. 2.3, eqs. (A.7)-(A.16) and (2.43)] The analytic integration, which is the core claim of the paper, is not present in the manuscript for the quantities that determine physical predictions. Appendix A.2 lists only the pole parts of the insertion operators: the coefficient functions of I_B(epsilon) in eqs. (A.14)-(A.16) are truncated at O(epsilon^0), and the finite O(epsilon^0) parts of the operators that multiply the one-loop and Born cross sections are not displayed at all; the text in Sec. 2.3 concedes that the complete finite parts are quite elaborate and does not present them. Consequently, the pole-cancellation check of eq. (2.43) that the paper describes is a check of the divergent parts only: an error in a finite part that leaves the pole structure intact would be invisible to this test, to the local-cancellation tests of Figs. 1 and 2, and to any reader of the paper; it could be detected only by inspecting the code or through an external numerical comparison. Given that the abstract's claim to have integrated the subtractions fully analytically is a central advertised result, the finite parts of the insertion operators, or a summary sufficient for numerical reproduction, should be made available in the paper rather than only in the repository.
  3. [Sec. 3, Table 3, Fig. 4] The external validation covers a single observable against a code that is not fully independent. Table 3 compares total cross sections with n3loxs after two modifications to that code (import of the alpha_s routine from NNLOCAL and exclusion of quark channels), and n3loxs shares an author with the present paper; the paper itself calls the comparison tuned. The sub-permille agreement over six mass points is strong evidence for the inclusive rate, and together with the plateau tests of Fig. 3 it is good evidence for cutoff independence. However, the only fully differential output, the rapidity distribution of Fig. 4, is not compared with any independent calculation. Because the total rate is the integral of dsigma/dy_H, a finite-part error in an insertion operator that redistributes events within the observed rapidity range would survive the inclusive agreement, and an error whose momentum-fraction dependence is partially absorbed by the PDF convolution would likewise be masked. An independent differential benchmark of dsigma/dy_H against an NNLO code based on a different subtraction formalism, or a comparison of a second binned observable with a published reference value, would close this gap.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 3, text before Table 3] The phrase "perfect agreement" before Table 3 overstates what is shown: the quoted relative differences are sub-permille but carry Monte Carlo uncertainties, and "agreement within the quoted uncertainties" is the more precise formulation.
  2. [Abstract and Sec. 4] The claim of "the first public implementation of a completely local analytic subtraction scheme at NNLO" should be reconciled explicitly with ref. [14], whose title is "Local analytic sector subtraction at NNLO"; a sentence identifying the distinguishing features of the present scheme would remove ambiguity for readers.
  3. [Fig. 3] The right-hand panel of Fig. 3 probes Delta x_min only one order of magnitude below the default value of 10^-5, so the plateau claim is demonstrated over a narrower range for Delta x_min than for s_min; one or two points at smaller values, or a statement that smaller values are impractical with double precision, would strengthen the claim.
  4. [Eq. (A.5) and footnote 11] The four-term structure of eq. (A.5) is explained by the footnote example, but a parenthetical in the main text identifying the four terms with the (eta_a, eta_b), (1, eta_b), (eta_a, 1), and (1, 1) combinations of the coefficient-function arguments would help the reader map the notation onto the usual distribution action.
  5. [Sec. 2.3 and Appendix A.2] The flavor-index notation is not uniform: eq. (2.39) writes the operator as I^{(0)}_{1,ac,bd}(epsilon), while Appendix A.2 uses I^{ac,bd}(eta_a, eta_b; epsilon | kappa_a, kappa_b); adopting a single convention would ease reading of the convolution structure.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circular derivation chain: the predicted cross sections are independent Monte Carlo results checked against an external, though author-overlapping and modified, benchmark; deferred definitions are incompleteness rather than circularity.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain, the load-bearing result is the NNLO cross section obtained by Monte Carlo integration of the local-subtraction formula. Nothing in that result is defined in terms of the comparison value. The subtraction terms and integrated insertion operators are constructed from QCD IR factorization formulae and known virtual matrix elements; the epsilon-pole cancellation in eq. (2.43) is an internal consistency check of the scheme, not a prediction fitted to data. The validation against n3loxs (Sec. 3, Table 3) is a benchmark: the NNLOCAL results are computed with default technical cutoffs smin and Delta-xmin that are demonstrated to lie on plateaus (Fig. 3), and no parameter is tuned to reproduce n3loxs. The comparison has reduced independence because n3loxs shares author C. Duhr and the paper states two changes were made to the public version (strong-coupling routine and exclusion of quark channels); this is a legitimate caveat but not a circular reduction, since the NNLOCAL integrand is not derived from n3loxs. The repeated deferrals of definitions and integration details to upcoming publications (Secs. 2.2 and 2.3) are missing support, not circularity: an omitted derivation cannot by itself make the result equivalent to its inputs. The self-citations to CoLoRFulNNLO supply the construction template, but those prior results are external, parameter-free computations for different processes and do not include the Higgs cross section predicted here. No step was found where a predicted quantity equals an input by construction. Score 1 reflects only the minor author overlap in the validation benchmark.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The scheme introduces no new physical entities. Its free parameters are technical cutoffs and a trimming parameter, all shown not to affect physical results. The load-bearing content is the assumed universality of NNLO IR factorization and the (deferred) construction details of the subtraction terms.

free parameters (3)
  • smin = 5e-3 GeV^2
    Technical cutoff on two-parton invariants to avoid numerical instabilities in the local subtraction; the paper demonstrates that results are stable as smin is lowered (Fig. 3).
  • Delta xmin = 1e-5
    Technical cutoff for regions near xa = xb where certain integrated counterterms produce 0/0 forms; results shown to be independent of this cutoff.
  • alpha (trimming parameter) = 0.015
    Parameter for the alpha-trimmed mean used to mitigate misbinning in distributions; not a physics parameter and shown to have no effect on total cross sections.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Universality of IR factorization at NNLO
    Eq. (2.12) assumes process-independent singular factors Sing(i)_j up to NNLO; this is well established from refs. [19-22] but is a background assumption of the subtraction construction.
  • domain assumption Exact phase-space factorization for all momentum mappings
    Eq. (2.33) requires every mapping to yield an exact convolution factorization of the real-emission phase space; asserted in Sec. 2.3 and used for the analytic integration.
  • ad hoc to paper Damping functions do not spoil physical cancellations
    Sec. 2.2 introduces damping functions to remove spurious singularities from crossed momentum fractions, claiming they can be chosen to not interfere with physical cancellations; the detailed construction is deferred.
  • ad hoc to paper Color-singlet cancellations hold
    Several cancellations, e.g., the soft term S(0,1)_r canceling against collinear-soft overlaps in eq. (2.27), are stated as holding for color-singlet production, with details deferred to future publications.
  • domain assumption Gluon-only subprocess is representative
    The Introduction states that the fully gluonic subprocess exercises all IR singularity types relevant to color-singlet production; this justifies the nf=0 validation but is not proven for quark channels.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of NNLOCAL: completely local subtractions for color-singlet production in hadron collisions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SZ43KN73

@misc{pith2026241221028,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: NNLOCAL: completely local subtractions for color-singlet production in hadron collisions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SZ43KN73}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.21028}
}
read the original abstract

We present NNLOCAL, a proof-of-concept parton-level Monte Carlo program implementing the extension of the completely local subtraction scheme CoLoRFulNNLO to the case of color-singlet production in hadron collisions. We have built general local subtraction terms that regularize all single and double unresolved infrared singularities in real radiation phase space. The subtractions are then integrated fully analytically to the required order in the parameter of dimensional regularization. Combining the integrated counterterms with the virtual contributions we demonstrate the cancellation of all infrared poles explicitly. We validate our procedure by computing the fully differential cross section for the production of a Higgs boson at the LHC in an effective field theory with gluons only. Our code provides the first public implementation of a completely local analytic subtraction scheme at next-to-next-to-leading order accuracy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.21028 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The behavior of |1 − R| in the g(p1) + g(p2) → H(p3) + g(p4) + g(p5) subprocess as various single (first row) and double (second row) unresolved kinematic limits are approached. Here R denotes the ratio R = (A (0) 1 + A (0) 2 − A(0) 12 )/|M(0) gg,H+2| 2 . The proximity to a given limit is measured by the smallness of an appropriate invariant. The dashed vertical line denotes the default value of the technical cutoff… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The behavior of |1 − R| in the g(p1) + g(p2) → H(p3) + g(p4) subprocess at one-loop or￾der as single unresolved kinematic limits are approached. Here R denotes the ratio R = (A (1) 1 + AΓ 1 + AI 1 )/(|Mgg,H+1| 2 1−loop+Γ (1) ⊗ |M(0) gg,H+1| 2+I (0) 1 ⊗ |M(0) gg,H+1| 2 ). The proximity to a given limit is mea￾sured by the smallness of an appropriate invariant. The dashed vertical line denotes the default value of the… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The dependence of the total cross section on the technical cutoffs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The rapidity distribution of the Higgs boson at NNLO in HEFT with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The trimmed rapidity distribution of the Higgs boson at NNLO in HEFT with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The double virtual (VV), real-virtual (RV) and double real (RR) parts of the NNLO correction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages

  1. [43]

    Van Thurenhout, V

    S. Van Thurenhout, V. Del Duca, C. Duhr, L. Fek´ esh´ azy, F. Guadagni, P. Mukherjee et al., CoLoRFul for hadron collisions: Integrating the counterterms , 12, 2024. arXiv:2412.12750

    arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    Aad et al., Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC , Phys

    ATLAS collaboration, G. Aad et al., Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC , Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1207.7214]

    arXiv 2012

  3. [2]

    Chatrchyan et al., Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC , Phys

    CMS collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al., Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC , Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30 [ arXiv:1207.7235]

    arXiv 2012

  4. [3]

    Br¨ uning and L

    O. Br¨ uning and L. Rossi,The High Luminosity Large Hadron Collider , WORLD SCIENTIFIC (2015), 10.1142/9581

    doi:10.1142/9581 2015

  5. [4]

    Golling et al., Physics at a 100 TeV pp collider: beyond the Standard Model phenomena , arXiv:1606.00947

    T. Golling et al., Physics at a 100 TeV pp collider: beyond the Standard Model phenomena , arXiv:1606.00947

    arXiv

  6. [5]

    Contino et al., Physics at a 100 TeV pp collider: Higgs and EW symmetry breaking studies , arXiv:1606.09408

    R. Contino et al., Physics at a 100 TeV pp collider: Higgs and EW symmetry breaking studies , arXiv:1606.09408

    arXiv

  7. [6]

    Frixione, Z

    S. Frixione, Z. Kunszt and A. Signer, Three jet cross-sections to next-to-leading order , Nucl. Phys. B 467 (1996) 399 [ hep-ph/9512328]

    arXiv 1996

  8. [7]

    Catani and M.H

    S. Catani and M.H. Seymour, A General algorithm for calculating jet cross-sections in NLO QCD , Nucl. Phys. B 485 (1997) 291 [ hep-ph/9605323]

    arXiv 1997

Show all 65 references
  1. [8]

    Catani and M

    S. Catani and M. Grazzini, An NNLO subtraction formalism in hadron collisions and its application to Higgs boson production at the LHC , Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 222002 [ hep-ph/0703012]

    2007 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Gaunt, M

    J. Gaunt, M. Stahlhofen, F.J. Tackmann and J.R. Walsh, N-jettiness Subtractions for NNLO QCD Calculations, JHEP 09 (2015) 058 [ arXiv:1505.04794]

    2015 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Gehrmann-De Ridder, T

    A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann and E.W.N. Glover, Antenna subtraction at NNLO , JHEP 09 (2005) 056 [ hep-ph/0505111]

    2005 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Czakon and D

    M. Czakon and D. Heymes, Four-dimensional formulation of the sector-improved residue subtraction scheme, Nucl. Phys. B 890 (2014) 152 [ arXiv:1408.2500]

    2014 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Caola, K

    F. Caola, K. Melnikov and R. R¨ ontsch,Nested soft-collinear subtractions in NNLO QCD computations, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 248 [ arXiv:1702.01352]. 12The total number of evaluations in each job is still set by ncall1, however the value set for itmx1 is now irrelevant, as th...

    2017 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Cacciari, F.A

    M. Cacciari, F.A. Dreyer, A. Karlberg, G.P. Salam and G. Zanderighi, Fully Differential Vector-Boson-Fusion Higgs Production at Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 082002 [ arXiv:1506.02660]

    2015 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Magnea, E

    L. Magnea, E. Maina, G. Pelliccioli, C. Signorile-Signorile, P. Torrielli and S. Uccirati, Local analytic sector subtraction at NNLO , JHEP 12 (2018) 107 [ arXiv:1806.09570]

    2018 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Herzog, Geometric IR subtraction for final state real radiation , JHEP 08 (2018) 006 [arXiv:1804.07949]

    F. Herzog, Geometric IR subtraction for final state real radiation , JHEP 08 (2018) 006 [arXiv:1804.07949]

    2018 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Collins, D.E

    J.C. Collins, D.E. Soper and G.F. Sterman, Factorization for Short Distance Hadron - Hadron Scattering, Nucl. Phys. B 261 (1985) 104

    1985

  10. [17]

    Collins, D.E

    J.C. Collins, D.E. Soper and G.F. Sterman, Factorization of Hard Processes in QCD , Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys. 5 (1989) 1 [ hep-ph/0409313]

    1989 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Collins and A

    J.C. Collins and A. Metz, Universality of soft and collinear factors in hard-scattering factorization , Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 252001 [ hep-ph/0408249]

    2004 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Campbell and E.W.N

    J.M. Campbell and E.W.N. Glover, Double unresolved approximations to multiparton scattering amplitudes, Nucl. Phys. B 527 (1998) 264 [ hep-ph/9710255]

    1998 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Catani and M

    S. Catani and M. Grazzini, Infrared factorization of tree level QCD amplitudes at the next-to-next-to-leading order and beyond , Nucl. Phys. B 570 (2000) 287 [ hep-ph/9908523]

    2000 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Z. Bern, V. Del Duca, W.B. Kilgore and C.R. Schmidt, The infrared behavior of one loop QCD amplitudes at next-to-next-to leading order , Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 116001 [ hep-ph/9903516]

    1999 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Catani and M

    S. Catani and M. Grazzini, The soft gluon current at one loop order , Nucl. Phys. B 591 (2000) 435 [hep-ph/0007142]

    2000 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Somogyi, Z

    G. Somogyi, Z. Tr´ ocs´ anyi and V. Del Duca,Matching of singly- and doubly-unresolved limits of tree-level QCD squared matrix elements , JHEP 06 (2005) 024 [ hep-ph/0502226]

    2005 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Somogyi and Z

    G. Somogyi and Z. Tr´ ocs´ anyi,A Subtraction scheme for computing QCD jet cross sections at NNLO: Regularization of real-virtual emission , JHEP 01 (2007) 052 [ hep-ph/0609043]

    2007 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Somogyi, Z

    G. Somogyi, Z. Tr´ ocs´ anyi and V. Del Duca,A Subtraction scheme for computing QCD jet cross sections at NNLO: Regularization of doubly-real emissions , JHEP 01 (2007) 070 [ hep-ph/0609042]

    2007 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Del Duca, C

    V. Del Duca, C. Duhr, G. Somogyi, F. Tramontano and Z. Tr´ ocs´ anyi,Higgs boson decay into b-quarks at NNLO accuracy , JHEP 04 (2015) 036 [ arXiv:1501.07226]

    2015 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Del Duca, C

    V. Del Duca, C. Duhr, A. Kardos, G. Somogyi and Z. Tr´ ocs´ anyi,Three-Jet Production in Electron-Positron Collisions at Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order Accuracy , Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 152004 [arXiv:1603.08927]

    2016 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Del Duca, C

    V. Del Duca, C. Duhr, A. Kardos, G. Somogyi, Z. Sz˝ or, Z. Tr´ ocs´ anyi et al.,Jet production in the CoLoRFulNNLO method: event shapes in electron-positron collisions , Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 074019 [arXiv:1606.03453]

    2016 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Somogyi and F

    G. Somogyi and F. Tramontano, Fully exclusive heavy quark-antiquark pair production from a colourless initial state at NNLO in QCD , JHEP 11 (2020) 142 [ arXiv:2007.15015]

    2020 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Ellis, M.K

    J.R. Ellis, M.K. Gaillard and D.V. Nanopoulos, A Phenomenological Profile of the Higgs Boson , Nucl. Phys. B 106 (1976) 292. 32

    1976

  24. [31]

    Voloshin, Once Again About the Role of Gluonic Mechanism in Interaction of Light Higgs Boson with Hadrons , Sov

    M.B. Voloshin, Once Again About the Role of Gluonic Mechanism in Interaction of Light Higgs Boson with Hadrons , Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 44 (1986) 478

    1986

  25. [32]

    Shifman, Anomalies and Low-Energy Theorems of Quantum Chromodynamics , Sov

    M.A. Shifman, Anomalies and Low-Energy Theorems of Quantum Chromodynamics , Sov. Phys. Usp. 32 (1989) 289

    1989

  26. [33]

    Dawson, Radiative corrections to Higgs boson production , Nucl

    S. Dawson, Radiative corrections to Higgs boson production , Nucl. Phys. B 359 (1991) 283

    1991

  27. [34]

    Djouadi, M

    A. Djouadi, M. Spira and P.M. Zerwas, Production of Higgs bosons in proton colliders: QCD corrections, Phys. Lett. B 264 (1991) 440

    1991

  28. [35]

    Graudenz, M

    D. Graudenz, M. Spira and P.M. Zerwas, QCD corrections to Higgs boson production at proton proton colliders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 1372

    1993

  29. [36]

    Spira, A

    M. Spira, A. Djouadi, D. Graudenz and P.M. Zerwas, Higgs boson production at the LHC , Nucl. Phys. B 453 (1995) 17 [ hep-ph/9504378]

    1995 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Ellis, W.J

    R.K. Ellis, W.J. Stirling and B.R. Webber, QCD and collider physics , vol. 8, Cambridge University Press (2, 2011), 10.1017/CBO9780511628788

    2011 doi

  31. [38]

    Altarelli and G

    G. Altarelli and G. Parisi, Asymptotic Freedom in Parton Language , Nucl. Phys. B 126 (1977) 298

    1977

  32. [39]

    Curci, W

    G. Curci, W. Furmanski and R. Petronzio, Evolution of Parton Densities Beyond Leading Order: The Nonsinglet Case , Nucl. Phys. B 175 (1980) 27

    1980

  33. [40]

    Catani, D

    S. Catani, D. de Florian and G. Rodrigo, Space-like (versus time-like) collinear limits in QCD: Is factorization violated?, JHEP 07 (2012) 026 [ arXiv:1112.4405]

    2012 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Daleo, T

    A. Daleo, T. Gehrmann and D. Maitre, Antenna subtraction with hadronic initial states , JHEP 04 (2007) 016 [ hep-ph/0612257]

    2007 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Del Duca, N

    V. Del Duca, N. Deutschmann and S. Lionetti, Momentum mappings for subtractions at higher orders in QCD , JHEP 12 (2019) 129 [ arXiv:1910.01024]

    2019 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Kotikov, Differential equations method: New technique for massive Feynman diagrams calculation, Phys

    A.V. Kotikov, Differential equations method: New technique for massive Feynman diagrams calculation, Phys. Lett. B 254 (1991) 158

    1991

  37. [45]

    Kotikov, Differential equation method: The Calculation of N point Feynman diagrams , Phys

    A.V. Kotikov, Differential equation method: The Calculation of N point Feynman diagrams , Phys. Lett. B 267 (1991) 123

    1991

  38. [46]

    Kotikov, Differential equations method: The Calculation of vertex type Feynman diagrams , Phys

    A.V. Kotikov, Differential equations method: The Calculation of vertex type Feynman diagrams , Phys. Lett. B 259 (1991) 314

    1991

  39. [47]

    Gehrmann and E

    T. Gehrmann and E. Remiddi, Differential equations for two-loop four-point functions , Nucl. Phys. B 580 (2000) 485 [ hep-ph/9912329]

    2000 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Brown, The Massless higher-loop two-point function , Commun

    F. Brown, The Massless higher-loop two-point function , Commun. Math. Phys. 287 (2009) 925 [arXiv:0804.1660]

    2009 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Anastasiou, C

    C. Anastasiou, C. Duhr, F. Dulat and B. Mistlberger, Soft triple-real radiation for Higgs production at N3LO , JHEP 07 (2013) 003 [ arXiv:1302.4379]

    2013 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Duhr and F

    C. Duhr and F. Dulat, PolyLogTools — polylogs for the masses , JHEP 08 (2019) 135 [arXiv:1904.07279]. 33

    2019 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Goncharov, Multiple polylogarithms and mixed Tate motives , May, 2001, 10.48550/arXiv.math/0103059

    A.B. Goncharov, Multiple polylogarithms and mixed Tate motives , May, 2001, 10.48550/arXiv.math/0103059

    2001 doi arXiv

  44. [52]

    Lewin, Polylogarithms and Associated Functions, North Holland, Amsterdam (1981)

    L. Lewin, Polylogarithms and Associated Functions, North Holland, Amsterdam (1981)

    1981

  45. [53]

    Goncharov, Volumes of hyperbolic manifolds and mixed Tate motives , J

    A.B. Goncharov, Volumes of hyperbolic manifolds and mixed Tate motives , J. Amer. Math. Soc. 12 (1999) 569 [ alg-geom/9601021]

    1999 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Kellerhals, Volumes in hyperbolic 5-space, Geometric & Functional Analysis GAF A 5 (1995) 640

    R. Kellerhals, Volumes in hyperbolic 5-space, Geometric & Functional Analysis GAF A 5 (1995) 640

    1995

  47. [55]

    C. Duhr, H. Gangl and J.R. Rhodes, From polygons and symbols to polylogarithmic functions , JHEP 10 (2012) 075 [ arXiv:1110.0458]

    2012 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Catani, The Singular behavior of QCD amplitudes at two loop order , Phys

    S. Catani, The Singular behavior of QCD amplitudes at two loop order , Phys. Lett. B 427 (1998) 161 [hep-ph/9802439]

    1998 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Campbell and R.K

    J.M. Campbell and R.K. Ellis, An Update on vector boson pair production at hadron colliders , Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 113006 [ hep-ph/9905386]

    1999 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Campbell, R.K

    J.M. Campbell, R.K. Ellis and C. Williams, Vector Boson Pair Production at the LHC , JHEP 07 (2011) 018 [ arXiv:1105.0020]

    2011 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Campbell and T

    J. Campbell and T. Neumann, Precision Phenomenology with MCFM , JHEP 12 (2019) 034 [arXiv:1909.09117]

    2019 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Lepage, A New Algorithm for Adaptive Multidimensional Integration , J

    G.P. Lepage, A New Algorithm for Adaptive Multidimensional Integration , J. Comput. Phys. 27 (1978) 192

    1978

  53. [61]

    Baglio, C

    J. Baglio, C. Duhr, B. Mistlberger and R. Szafron, Inclusive production cross sections at N 3LO, JHEP 12 (2022) 066 [ arXiv:2209.06138]

    2022 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Ball et al., Parton distributions for the LHC Run II , JHEP 04 (2015) 040 [arXiv:1410.8849]

    NNPDF collaboration, R.D. Ball et al., Parton distributions for the LHC Run II , JHEP 04 (2015) 040 [arXiv:1410.8849]

    2015 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Maronna, D.R

    R.A. Maronna, D.R. Martin, V.J. Yohai and M. Salibian-Barrera, Robust Statistics: Theory and Methods (with R) , Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, 2 nd ed., John Wiley & Sons Ltd, New York (2018), 10.1002/9781119214656

    2018 doi

  56. [64]

    Andrews, P.J

    D.F. Andrews, P.J. Bickel, F.R. Hampel, P.J. Huber, W.H. Rogers and J.W. Tukey, Robust Estimates of Location: Survey and Advances , Princeton Legacy Library, Princeton University Press (1972)

    1972

  57. [65]

    Buckley, J

    A. Buckley, J. Ferrando, S. Lloyd, K. Nordstr¨ om, B. Page, M. R¨ ufenacht et al.,LHAPDF6: parton density access in the LHC precision era , Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 132 [ arXiv:1412.7420]. 34

    2015 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.