REVIEW 1 cited by
M4Depth: Monocular depth estimation for autonomous vehicles in unseen environments
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Estimating the distance to objects is crucial for autonomous vehicles when using depth sensors is not possible. In this case, the distance has to be estimated from on-board mounted RGB cameras, which is a complex task especially in environments such as natural outdoor landscapes. In this paper, we present a new method named M4Depth for depth estimation. First, we establish a bijective relationship between depth and the visual disparity of two consecutive frames and show how to exploit it to perform motion-invariant pixel-wise depth estimation. Then, we detail M4Depth which is based on a pyramidal convolutional neural network architecture where each level refines an input disparity map estimate by using two customized cost volumes. We use these cost volumes to leverage the visual spatio-temporal constraints imposed by motion and to make the network robust for varied scenes. We benchmarked our approach both in test and generalization modes on public datasets featuring synthetic camera trajectories recorded in a wide variety of outdoor scenes. Results show that our network outperforms the state of the art on these datasets, while also performing well on a standard depth estimation benchmark. The code of our method is publicly available at https://github.com/michael-fonder/M4Depth.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Neural Field Representations of Mobile Computational Photography
Fitting neural fields directly to raw phone bursts reconstructs depth, separates reflections and occluders, and stitches panoramas, outperforming the compared baselines on the thesis's benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.