SAD-Flower: Flow Matching for Safe, Admissible, and Dynamically Consistent Planning
read the original abstract
Flow matching (FM) has shown promising results in data-driven planning. However, it inherently lacks formal guarantees for ensuring state and action constraints, whose satisfaction is a fundamental and crucial requirement for the safety and admissibility of planned trajectories on various systems. Moreover, existing FM planners do not ensure the dynamical consistency, which potentially renders trajectories inexecutable. We address these shortcomings by proposing SAD-Flower, a novel framework for generating Safe, Admissible, and Dynamically consistent trajectories. Our approach relies on an augmentation of the flow with a virtual control input. Thereby, principled guidance can be derived using techniques from nonlinear control theory, providing formal guarantees for state constraints, action constraints, and dynamic consistency. Crucially, SAD-Flower operates without retraining, enabling test-time satisfaction of unseen constraints. Through extensive experiments across several tasks, we demonstrate that SAD-Flower outperforms various generative-model-based baselines in ensuring constraint satisfaction.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Closing the Motion Execution Gap: From Semantic Motion Task Constraints to Kinematic Control
Motion Statecharts with a differentiable kinematic world model and lMPC close the gap between semantic motion constraints and executable kinematic control, demonstrated on eight robot platforms via the open-source Gis...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.