REVIEW 2 cited by
Stance Detection with Bidirectional Conditional Encoding
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Stance detection is the task of classifying the attitude expressed in a text towards a target such as Hillary Clinton to be "positive", negative" or "neutral". Previous work has assumed that either the target is mentioned in the text or that training data for every target is given. This paper considers the more challenging version of this task, where targets are not always mentioned and no training data is available for the test targets. We experiment with conditional LSTM encoding, which builds a representation of the tweet that is dependent on the target, and demonstrate that it outperforms encoding the tweet and the target independently. Performance is improved further when the conditional model is augmented with bidirectional encoding. We evaluate our approach on the SemEval 2016 Task 6 Twitter Stance Detection corpus achieving performance second best only to a system trained on semi-automatically labelled tweets for the test target. When such weak supervision is added, our approach achieves state-of-the-art results.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
MLSD: A Novel Few-Shot Learning Approach to Enhance Cross-Target and Cross-Domain Stance Detection
A metric learning approach selects few-shot fine-tuning samples that improve cross-target and cross-domain stance detection over random selection across six models.
-
MVAN: Multi-View Attention Networks for Fake News Detection on Social Media
MVAN, a model combining BiGRU text attention with graph attention over retweet structures, reports accuracy gains of roughly 2.5 percent over prior state-of-the-art on Twitter15 and Twitter16.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.