pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.06102 · v1 · pith:T5HP2YPZnew · submitted 2026-06-04 · 💻 cs.AI · cs.LG

Step-adaptive multimodal fusion network with multi-scale cloud feature learning for ultra-short-term solar irradiance forecasting

Jingxin Zhang Xiaoqin Wang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 01:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.AI cs.LG
keywords solar irradiance forecastingmultimodal fusioncloud image processingultra-short-term predictiondeep learningInceptionNeXtLSTMphotovoltaic
0
0 comments X

The pith

A step-adaptive multimodal fusion network with multi-scale cloud feature extraction improves ultra-short-term solar irradiance forecasts over prior methods.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper targets better ultra-short-term solar irradiance prediction to support photovoltaic dispatch and grid stability. It argues that existing single time-series models miss cloud spatial dynamics, standard convolutions fail at multi-scale cloud features, and fixed low-frequency compensation does not adapt to different forecast horizons. The proposed model applies InceptionNeXt to ground-based cloud images for multi-scale spatial features, adds a step-adaptive unit to modulate low-frequency information by horizon, fuses the result with meteorological time series, and uses TempAttnLSTM to model temporal dependencies. Tests on the NREL public dataset and Shandong photovoltaic stations show gains versus several state-of-the-art baselines.

Core claim

The paper establishes that its step-adaptive multimodal fusion network, built around InceptionNeXt for multi-scale multi-directional cloud image features, a step-adaptive low-frequency compensation unit, and TempAttnLSTM for global temporal modeling, delivers higher accuracy in ultra-short-term solar irradiance forecasting than existing approaches when evaluated on the NREL dataset and real stations in Shandong.

What carries the argument

InceptionNeXt extracts multi-scale spatial features from cloud images; the step-adaptive low-frequency compensation unit dynamically adjusts global information according to the prediction step; TempAttnLSTM models temporal dependencies after fusing image and meteorological time-series features.

If this is right

  • Spatial cloud dynamics captured from images reduce forecast error under complex weather compared with time-series-only models.
  • Dynamic adjustment of low-frequency compensation to each prediction step enables more reliable multi-step outputs.
  • Fusion of image-derived features with meteorological series produces more robust predictions than either modality alone.
  • The overall architecture supports direct use in photovoltaic system dispatch and grid stability applications.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The step-adaptive unit could be tested on other sequence prediction tasks where optimal compensation changes with horizon length.
  • Replacing InceptionNeXt with alternative multi-scale extractors would show whether the gains depend on that specific backbone.
  • Application to wind or load forecasting under visual sky conditions would test transferability beyond solar irradiance.

Load-bearing premise

The three listed shortcomings of prior work are the main limits to accuracy and the new components fix them without adding offsetting errors or dataset-specific artifacts.

What would settle it

A head-to-head test on an independent dataset with different cloud patterns or forecast horizons in which the proposed model shows no accuracy gain over the strongest baselines.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.06102 by Jingxin Zhang Xiaoqin Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The IST model 2. Methodology 2.1. The overall procedure A multimodal forecasting model dubbed IST is developed in this work, embedding multi-scale cloud image feature ex￾traction, step-adaptive low-frequency compensation and tem￾poral attention modules. This model efficiently extracts multi￾dimensional visual features from cloud images, covering cloud morphology, spatial distribution, motion trajectories a… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Error density distribution on the NREL data: the proposed IST model vs. comparative methods [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Error density distribution on the practical Shandong PV data: the proposed IST model vs. comparative methods [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Ultra-short-term solar irradiance prediction is critical for photovoltaic system dispatch and power grid stability. Existing approaches suffer from three key shortcomings: single time-series models cannot capture the spatial dynamics of clouds under complex conditions, standard convolutions inadequately represent multi-scale cloud features, and fixed low-frequency compensation strategies fail to adapt to different prediction steps. To address these issues, this proposes a multi-source data fusion model for ultra-short-term irradiance prediction. The model first employs InceptionNeXt to extract multi-scale, multi-directional spatial features from ground-based cloud images. A step-adaptive low-frequency compensation unit is then introduced to dynamically modulate global low-frequency information based on the prediction step. Eventually, the enhanced image features are combined with meteorological time-series features, and a TempAttnLSTM network captures global temporal dependencies for multi-step prediction. Experiments on the public NREL dataset and practical photovoltaic stations in Shandong illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method compared with several state-of-the-art approaches.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a step-adaptive multimodal fusion network for ultra-short-term solar irradiance forecasting. It uses InceptionNeXt to extract multi-scale and multi-directional spatial features from ground-based cloud images, introduces a step-adaptive low-frequency compensation unit to dynamically modulate global low-frequency information according to the prediction step, fuses the enhanced image features with meteorological time-series data, and employs a TempAttnLSTM network to capture global temporal dependencies for multi-step prediction. Experiments on the public NREL dataset and practical photovoltaic stations in Shandong are stated to demonstrate effectiveness relative to several state-of-the-art approaches.

Significance. If the claimed performance gains hold under rigorous validation, the work could advance ultra-short-term solar forecasting by jointly addressing spatial cloud dynamics via multi-scale convolutions and step-dependent low-frequency adaptation, which are relevant for photovoltaic dispatch and grid stability. The multimodal design and use of a public benchmark dataset are positive elements for potential reproducibility.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that experiments 'illustrate the effectiveness' of the proposed method is unsupported by any quantitative results, error bars, ablation studies, dataset statistics, or specific metric values (e.g., RMSE/MAE improvements). This evidentiary gap is load-bearing for the central claim of superiority over SOTA methods.
  2. [Experiments] Experiments section (as summarized): without component-level ablations isolating the contribution of the step-adaptive low-frequency compensation unit versus InceptionNeXt or TempAttnLSTM, it is not possible to confirm that the new components address the three stated shortcomings without introducing offsetting errors or dataset-specific artifacts.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the three shortcomings of prior work are clearly enumerated, but the manuscript would benefit from briefly stating the magnitude of reported gains (even in the abstract) to allow readers to gauge practical significance.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on the abstract and experiments. We will revise the manuscript to strengthen the evidentiary basis for our claims while preserving the core contributions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that experiments 'illustrate the effectiveness' of the proposed method is unsupported by any quantitative results, error bars, ablation studies, dataset statistics, or specific metric values (e.g., RMSE/MAE improvements). This evidentiary gap is load-bearing for the central claim of superiority over SOTA methods.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract lacks specific quantitative support. In the revised version, the abstract will be updated to report key performance metrics (e.g., RMSE/MAE reductions on NREL and Shandong datasets) and direct comparisons to the referenced SOTA baselines, providing concrete evidence for the effectiveness claims. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Experiments] Experiments section (as summarized): without component-level ablations isolating the contribution of the step-adaptive low-frequency compensation unit versus InceptionNeXt or TempAttnLSTM, it is not possible to confirm that the new components address the three stated shortcomings without introducing offsetting errors or dataset-specific artifacts.

    Authors: We acknowledge the value of explicit component ablations. The revised manuscript will add dedicated ablation experiments that isolate the step-adaptive low-frequency compensation unit, InceptionNeXt multi-scale features, and TempAttnLSTM, quantifying their individual contributions and ruling out offsetting effects or dataset artifacts. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper presents an empirical architecture (InceptionNeXt for multi-scale cloud features, step-adaptive compensation unit, TempAttnLSTM for temporal fusion) whose central claim is measurable improvement on external public (NREL) and real-world (Shandong) datasets relative to prior SOTA methods. No equations, predictions, or uniqueness claims reduce by construction to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or load-bearing self-citations; the derivation chain consists of standard component motivations followed by independent experimental comparison. This is the most common honest outcome for applied ML papers whose value rests on external benchmarks rather than internal algebraic closure.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The model introduces one new architectural component whose internal parameters are learned from data and relies on standard deep-learning assumptions about feature extraction. No external benchmarks or machine-checked proofs are mentioned in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • neural network hyperparameters and learned weights
    All weights in InceptionNeXt, the compensation unit, and TempAttnLSTM are fitted to the training data on NREL and Shandong datasets.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption InceptionNeXt extracts multi-scale multi-directional spatial features from cloud images
    Invoked when the model is described as employing InceptionNeXt for this purpose.
  • domain assumption TempAttnLSTM captures global temporal dependencies from fused features
    Invoked when the model is described as using TempAttnLSTM for multi-step prediction.
invented entities (1)
  • step-adaptive low-frequency compensation unit no independent evidence
    purpose: dynamically modulate global low-frequency information based on the prediction step
    New component introduced to address the limitation of fixed low-frequency compensation strategies.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5695 in / 1670 out tokens · 48509 ms · 2026-06-28T01:35:09.443102+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Rafati, M

    A. Rafati, M. Joorabian, E. Mashhour, H. R. Shaker, High dimensional very short-term solar power forecast- ing based on a data-driven heuristic method, Energy 219 (2021) 119647

    2021

  2. [2]

    Alonso-Montesinos, F

    J. Alonso-Montesinos, F. Batlles, The use of a sky cam- era for solar radiation estimation based on digital image processing, Energy 90 (2015) 377–386

    2015

  3. [3]

    C. Shi, Z. Su, K. Zhang, X. Xie, X. Zhang, Cloudswin- net: A hybrid CNN-transformer framework for ground- based cloud images fine-grained segmentation, Energy 309 (2024) 133128

    2024

  4. [4]

    Z. Zhen, J. Liu, Z. Zhang, F. Wang, H. Chai, Y . Yu, X. Lu, T. Wang, Y . Lin, Deep learning based surface irradiance mapping model for solar PV power forecasting using sky image, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications 56 (4) (2020) 3385–3396

    2020

  5. [5]

    C. Feng, J. Zhang, W. Zhang, B.-M. Hodge, Convo- lutional neural networks for intra-hour solar forecast- ing based on sky image sequences, Applied Energy 310 (2022) 118438

    2022

  6. [6]

    Huang, J

    X. Huang, J. Liu, S. Xu, C. Li, Q. Li, Y . Tai, A 3D ConvLSTM-CNN network based on multi-channel color extraction for ultra-short-term solar irradiance forecast- ing, Energy 272 (2023) 127140

    2023

  7. [7]

    H. Zang, D. Chen, J. Liu, L. Cheng, G. Sun, Z. Wei, Improving ultra-short-term photovoltaic power forecast- ing using a novel sky-image-based framework considering spatial-temporal feature interaction, Energy 293 (2024) 130538. 11

    2024

  8. [8]

    Y . Nie, Q. Paletta, A. Scott, L. M. Pomares, G. Arbod, S. Sgouridis, J. Lasenby, A. Brandt, Sky image-based so- lar forecasting using deep learning with heterogeneous multi-location data: Dataset fusion versus transfer learn- ing, Applied Energy 369 (2024) 123467

    2024

  9. [9]

    A. L. Jonathan, D. Cai, C. C. Ukwuoma, N. J. J. Nkou, Q. Huang, O. Bamisile, A radiant shift: Attention- embedded CNNs for accurate solar irradiance forecasting and prediction from sky images, Renewable Energy 234 (2024) 121133

    2024

  10. [10]

    S. Xu, J. Liu, X. Huang, C. Li, Z. Chen, Y . Tai, Minutely multi-step irradiance forecasting based on all-sky images using LSTM-informerstack hybrid model with dual fea- ture enhancement, Renewable Energy 224 (2024) 120135

    2024

  11. [11]

    Q. Dai, X. Hou, D. Su, Z. Cui, Photovoltaic power pre- diction based on sky images and tokens-to-token vision transformer, International Journal of Renewable Energy Development 12 (6) (2023) 1104–1112

    2023

  12. [12]

    K. Wang, X. Qi, H. Liu, Photovoltaic power forecast- ing based on LSTM-convolutional network, Energy 189 (2019) 116225

    2019

  13. [13]

    C. Shi, M. Zhang, H. Xiang, K. Zhang, S. Ju, X. Zhang, L. Han, A ground-based cloud image classification method for photovoltaic power prediction based on con- volutional neural networks and vision transformer, Engi- neering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 159 (2025) 111582

    2025

  14. [14]

    Y . Ma, W. Yu, J. Zhu, Z. You, A. Jia, Research on ultra- short-term photovoltaic power forecasting using multi- modal data and ensemble learning, Energy 330 (2025) 136831

    2025

  15. [15]

    Caldas, R

    M. Caldas, R. Alonso-Suárez, Very short-term solar irra- diance forecast using all-sky imaging and real-time irradi- ance measurements, Renewable Energy 143 (2019) 1643– 1658

    2019

  16. [16]

    Ajith, M

    M. Ajith, M. Martínez-Ramón, Deep learning algorithms for very short term solar irradiance forecasting: A survey, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 182 (2023) 113362

    2023

  17. [17]

    Paletta, G

    Q. Paletta, G. Terrén-Serrano, Y . Nie, B. Li, J. Bieker, W. Zhang, L. Dubus, S. Dev, C. Feng, Advances in so- lar forecasting: Computer vision with deep learning, Ad- vances in Applied Energy 11 (2023) 100150

    2023

  18. [18]

    Hendrikx, K

    N. Hendrikx, K. Barhmi, L. Visser, T. De Bruin, M. Pó, A. Salah, W. Van Sark, All sky imaging-based short-term solar irradiance forecasting with long short-term memory networks, Solar Energy 272 (2024) 112463

    2024

  19. [19]

    Ansong, G

    M. Ansong, G. Huang, T. N. Nyang’onda, R. J. Musembi, B. S. Richards, Very short-term solar irradiance forecast- ing based on open-source low-cost sky imager and hy- brid deep-learning techniques, Solar Energy 294 (2025) 113516

    2025

  20. [20]

    W. Dou, K. Wang, S. Shan, M. Chen, K. Zhang, H. Wei, V . Sreeram, A multi-modal deep clustering method for day-ahead solar irradiance forecasting using ground- based cloud imagery and time series data, Energy 321 (2025) 135285

    2025

  21. [21]

    F. Wu, J. Wu, Y . Kong, C. Yang, G. Yang, H. Shu, G. Carrault, L. Senhadji, Multiscale low-frequency mem- ory network for improved feature extraction in convolu- tional neural networks, in: Proceedings of the AAAI Con- ference on Artificial Intelligence, V ol. 38, 2024, pp. 5967– 5975

    2024

  22. [22]

    W. Yu, P. Zhou, S. Yan, X. Wang, Inceptionnext: When in- ception meets convnext, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024, pp. 5672–5683

    2024

  23. [23]

    X. Wang, J. Wu, S. Wang, J. Zhang, Multi-stream decom- position with temporal attention for ultra-short-term pho- tovoltaic irradiance forecasting, in: 2025 China Automa- tion Congress (CAC), IEEE, 2025, pp. 6413–6420

    2025

  24. [24]

    Schuster, K

    M. Schuster, K. K. Paliwal, Bidirectional recurrent neu- ral networks, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 45 (11) (1997) 2673–2681

    1997

  25. [25]

    Y . Liu, T. Hu, H. Zhang, H. Wu, S. Wang, L. Ma, M. Long, itransformer: Inverted transformers are effective for time series forecasting, arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.06625 (2023)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    Y . Nie, N. H. Nguyen, P. Sinthong, J. Kalagnanam, A time series is worth 64 words: Long-term forecasting with transformers, arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.14730 (2022)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  27. [27]

    X. Zhao, H. Wei, H. Wang, T. Zhu, K. Zhang, 3D-CNN- based feature extraction of ground-based cloud images for direct normal irradiance prediction, Solar Energy 181 (2019) 510–518

    2019

  28. [28]

    Ajith, M

    M. Ajith, M. Martínez-Ramón, Deep learning based so- lar radiation micro forecast by fusion of infrared cloud images and radiation data, Applied Energy 294 (2021) 117014

    2021

  29. [29]

    S. Shan, C. Li, Z. Ding, Y . Wang, K. Zhang, H. Wei, Ensemble learning based multi-modal intra-hour irradi- ance forecasting, Energy Conversion and Management 270 (2022) 116206

    2022

  30. [30]

    Sengupta, Y

    M. Sengupta, Y . Xie, A. Lopez, A. Habte, G. Maclau- rin, J. Shelby, The national solar radiation data base (NSRDB), Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 89 (2018) 51–60. 12

    2018