REVIEW 1 cited by
Detection and Recovery of Hidden Submatrices
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In this paper, we study the problems of detection and recovery of hidden submatrices with elevated means inside a large Gaussian random matrix. We consider two different structures for the planted submatrices. In the first model, the planted matrices are disjoint, and their row and column indices can be arbitrary. Inspired by scientific applications, the second model restricts the row and column indices to be consecutive. In the detection problem, under the null hypothesis, the observed matrix is a realization of independent and identically distributed standard normal entries. Under the alternative, there exists a set of hidden submatrices with elevated means inside the same standard normal matrix. Recovery refers to the task of locating the hidden submatrices. For both problems, and for both models, we characterize the statistical and computational barriers by deriving information-theoretic lower bounds, designing and analyzing algorithms matching those bounds, and proving computational lower bounds based on the low-degree polynomials conjecture. In particular, we show that the space of the model parameters (i.e., number of planted submatrices, their dimensions, and elevated mean) can be partitioned into three regions: the impossible regime, where all algorithms fail; the hard regime, where while detection or recovery are statistically possible, we give some evidence that polynomial-time algorithm do not exist; and finally the easy regime, where polynomial-time algorithms exist.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The Quasi-Polynomial Low-Degree Conjecture is False
The paper constructs counterexamples showing that a vanishing low-degree advantage does not imply noise-tolerant computational hardness.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.