Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 10 cited by

Heavy hadronic molecules with pion exchange and quark core couplings: a guide for practitioners

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read X(3872) is best described as a shallow D D* molecule in which one-pion exchange and a small charmonium core provide comparable attraction.

desk verdict An honest practitioner review with a real normalization correction and a new c-cbar-OPEP calculation; the qualitative picture holds, but the quantitative 'comparable roles' claim rests on a model-scaled cutoff with no quoted uncertainty. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08790 v2 pith:T6IS6IMG submitted 2019-08-23 hep-ph nucl-th

Yasuhiro Yamaguchi , Atsushi Hosaka , Sachiko Takeuchi , Makoto Takizawa This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phnucl-th
keywords hadronicmoleculesexchangepionquarkhadronsheavyinteraction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Exotic hadrons are particles that do not fit the simple quark model of mesons, one quark and one antiquark, or baryons, three quarks. One popular explanation is the hadronic molecule: a loose bound state of two ordinary mesons held together by the leftover strong force, similar to a proton and neutron forming a deuteron. The paper focuses on X(3872), discovered in 2003 with a mass almost exactly at the threshold of a D and D* meson pair. The authors explain in detail how the exchange of a pion between the light quarks inside these mesons produces a tensor force that mixes orbital angular momentum states and creates attraction. This attraction is close to, but not quite enough to, bind the system on its own. The missing attraction comes from coupling to an intrinsic charmonium core, a compact charm-anticharm state. In the combined model, the molecular component dominates at large distances, while the core contributes about six percent of the wave function, consistent with production rates measured at high-energy colliders. The same framework applied to the charged Zc states shows a weaker pion attraction because of isospin factors, making a molecular interpretation less likely. The paper also corrects a missing factor of the square root of two in earlier calculations by the same group, which had reduced the apparent role of pion exchange.
Extended reading notes

Core claim

The load-bearing claim is that 'effects of the c¯c-D ¯D∗ coupling and OPEP are comparable in X(3872)' (Section 4.3). If correct, X(3872) is a shallow D bar-D* molecule with about 6% c bar-c admixture, bound by two comparable mechanisms: the tensor force from one-pion exchange and the coupling to a compact charmonium core.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion that OPEP alone does not bind the D bar-D* system, making the c bar-c coupling necessary, hinges on the cutoff Lambda_D = 1.13 GeV obtained by scaling the nucleon cutoff Lambda_N = 837 MeV with the quark-model size ratio r_N/r_D = 1.35 (Section 4.2, 'In [54,55], the cutoff ... Lambda = 1.13 GeV is obtained'). If the D-meson cutoff were a few hundred MeV larger, the standard point (g_A = 0.55, Lambda_D) would move into the bound region of Figure 7, and the central claim of comparable roles would weaken.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper is a pedagogical review of hadronic molecules, focusing on the role of one-pion exchange (OPEP) and the coupling of molecular components to compact quark cores. The authors derive the heavy-meson effective Lagrangian, the OPEP for P(*) anti-P(*) systems, and an energy-transfer-corrected pion mass, then apply the formalism to X(3872), Zc, and pentaquarks. The central quantitative claim is that X(3872) is a shallow D anti-D* molecule with a small (about 6%) c-cbar admixture, bound by two comparable mechanisms: the tensor part of OPEP and the coupling to a compact charmonium core. The paper also benchmarks the OPEP approach by reproducing deuteron properties with a single cutoff parameter, and it corrects a previously overlooked normalization factor in heavy-meson OPEP potentials.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper provides a coherent and relatively minimal model of X(3872) as a hybrid molecule, connecting the molecular picture to the observed production rates and isospin-breaking decay pattern. The detailed derivations of the OPEP, the treatment of the imaginary part for the inelastic D-D* channel with an optical-theorem check, and the deuteron benchmark are strengths that make the article genuinely useful as a guide for practitioners. The explicit correction of the missing √2 factor in earlier OPEP potentials is a valuable service to the community. The main weakness is the sensitivity of the central conclusion to the extrapolated D-meson cutoff, which the paper does not quantify.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.2, Figure 7] The conclusion that OPEP alone does not bind the D anti-D* system at the standard parameters (g_A = 0.55, Λ_D = 1.13 GeV) is the load-bearing premise for the claim that the c-cbar coupling is necessary for binding. However, Λ_D is obtained by scaling the nucleon cutoff with the quark-model size ratio r_N/r_D = 1.35 from Ref. [55], and the paper gives no uncertainty on this ratio or on the dipole form-factor extrapolation. Figure 7 shows that at g_A = 0.55 the OPEP-only boundary lies at Λ ≈ 1.6 GeV, so increasing Λ_D by about 40%, which is within plausible quark-model uncertainties, would move the system into the bound region. If OPEP alone binds at the actual Λ_D, the c-cbar coupling is not required for binding, and the quoted 5.9% admixture becomes a property of a particular cutoff choice rather than a robust structural statement. The authors should quantify the uncertainty in Λ_D or, at minimum, show how the qualitative conclusion changes when Λ_D is varied within a reasonable range.
  2. [§4.3, Tables 8 and 9] The claim that the c-cbar coupling and OPEP contribute comparably to binding X(3872) is based on the reductions of |c_ccbar|^2 (from 8.6% to 5.9%) and the D-state probability (from 2.0% to 0.6%) when both mechanisms are included. These probabilities are highly sensitive to the binding energy (0.16 MeV) and to the axial coupling g_A, which the authors themselves acknowledge later in the section. Equation (82) shows that the rms radius diverges as the binding energy approaches zero, so small variations in the input parameters can change the probability ratios significantly. Since the model is tuned to a specific binding energy, the 'comparable roles' conclusion is not robust to parameter variations. A sensitivity analysis varying the binding energy and g_A within the quoted experimental and theoretical uncertainties is needed before drawing this sharp conclusion, or the claim should be softened to a qualitative statement.
  3. [§4.3, Eq. (158)] The c-cbar to D anti-D* coupling strength g_c-cbar is determined by fitting the X(3872) mass, so the existence of a bound state is imposed by construction. The subsequently quoted outputs, such as the c-cbar probability, the isospin mixing ratio, and the decay spectrum peak position, are therefore only partially independent predictions. The paper should state this explicitly and, where possible, cross-check the fitted coupling against independent observables such as the B → D anti-D* K production rate or the line shape of the J/ψ ππ channel, to assess how much of the central scenario is constrained by data rather than by the fitting procedure.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Table 7] The charm-sector mass difference ΔM_PP* is listed as 145 MeV, but the quoted masses m_D = 1867 MeV and m_D* = 2009 MeV give a difference of 142 MeV. The stated value µ^2 = (37.3i)^2 MeV^2 is consistent with ΔM = 142 MeV, not 145 MeV. Please correct the table or the text.
  2. [§4.2] The expression 'µ^2 = (37.3i)^2 [MeV^2]' is dimensionally confusing; it should be written as µ = 37.3i MeV or µ^2 = −(37.3)^2 MeV^2.
  3. [§3.4, footnote] The footnote announcing the correction of the missing √2 factor in earlier OPEP potentials is welcome, but the numerical impact of this correction on previous conclusions (e.g., the binding of X(3872) in Refs. [54–60]) is not quantified. A brief statement of the size of the effect would help practitioners decide how much of the earlier literature needs to be revised.
  4. [§5.3, Figure 21] For the charm sector, the boundary plot shows that at the mean value g_σ ≲ 1.8 a very large cutoff Λ ~ 4 GeV is needed to bind the isovector states. The paper should comment on whether such a large cutoff is physically sensible or whether it indicates the need for additional short-range dynamics.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Partial circularity: g_{c\bar c} is fitted to the X(3872) mass, so the bound state and its 0.16 MeV binding energy are imposed; the 5.9% c\bar c probability and 'comparable roles' conclusion are outputs of that same fit, though not algebraically forced.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 4.3, around Eq. (158) and the parameter paragraph for Tables 8 and 9.]
    "The coupling strength gc¯c is taken so as to produce the observed mass of X(3872). ... As for the c¯c-OPEP model, the OPEP cutoff Λ = ΛD is the standard one obtained from the D-meson size as marked in figure 7 in the previous subsection. The c¯c-D ¯D coupling strength, gc¯c, in the c¯c-OPEP model is taken to be a free parameter to fit the binding energy."

    g_{c\bar c} is the parameter that generates the short-range attraction in the c\bar c-D\bar D^* mechanism. Fitting it to the observed X(3872) mass imposes the existence of the near-threshold bound state and its 0.16 MeV binding energy rather than predicting them. The paper then uses the same fitted solution to quote |c_{c\bar c}|^2 = 0.059 and a D-state probability of 0.006, and interprets the reductions from the one-mechanism models as evidence that the c\bar c coupling and OPEP are comparable. Those probabilities are nontrivial Schrodinger-equation outputs and are not literally equal to the fit parameter, so the circularity is partial; however, the central structural conclusion is diagnosed in a model whose binding energy is an input, not an output.

full rationale

The paper is largely a self-contained pedagogical derivation: g_A is extracted from D*→Dπ, the OPEP is derived from chiral Lagrangians, and the nucleon cutoff is anchored to the deuteron. The main caveat is in Section 4.3, where g_{c\bar c} is fitted to the X(3872) mass; this makes the existence and binding energy of the state an input. The 5.9% c\bar c admixture and the 'comparable roles' conclusion are partially dependent on that fit, though they are not identical to the fitted parameter. The scaling Λ_D = 1.13 GeV from the nucleon cutoff is an externally anchored estimate (with an acknowledged uncertainty), not a by-construction circular loop. The self-citations to [115] and [183] provide provenance for the model and tables, but the numerical results are displayed in the present paper, so they do not by themselves force the conclusion. Overall: one partial fitted-input circularity, score 4.

Assumptions & free parameters 9 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central calculation rests on a chain of fitted parameters: g_A from D* decay, Lambda_N from the deuteron, Lambda_D and Lambda_B from quark-model size ratios, and g_c-bar-c from the X(3872) mass itself. No new particles or forces are introduced; the c bar-c core is the known chi_c1(2P) charmonium state predicted by quark models.

free parameters (9)
  • g_A (heavy meson axial coupling) = 0.55 (from D*+ to D+ pi0 width)
    Axial coupling in the heavy meson chiral Lagrangian; extracted from the measured D* decay width in Section 2.3; sets the overall strength of the OPEP.
  • Lambda_N (nucleon OPEP cutoff) = 837 MeV
    Nucleon dipole cutoff fitted to the deuteron binding energy in Section 3.3; anchor for the heavy-meson cutoffs.
  • Lambda_D (D meson OPEP cutoff) = 1.13 GeV
    D-meson cutoff obtained from Lambda_N times r_N/r_D = 1.35 from the quark model in Section 4.2; determines whether OPEP alone binds the D bar-D* system.
  • Lambda_B (B meson OPEP cutoff) = 1.08 GeV
    B-meson cutoff from r_N/r_B = 1.29 in Section 4.2; used for bottom-sector predictions.
  • g_c-bar-c (c bar-c to D bar-D* coupling) = 0.05110 (c bar-c), 0.04445 (c bar-c-OPEP), 0.04136 (decay model)
    Coupling of the c bar-c core to D bar-D* channels; fitted to reproduce the observed X(3872) mass in Sections 4.3 and 4.4.
  • Lambda_q (form factor cutoff for c bar-c coupling) = 0.5 GeV
    Momentum cutoff in the c bar-c to D bar-D* form factor; constrained by the absence of a chi_c1(2P) enhancement in B to D bar-D* K in Section 4.3.
  • v0 and v-tilde0 (rearrangement and meson-meson strengths) = 0.1929 and -0.1886
    Strengths of the D bar-D* to J/psi omega/rho rearrangement and the D to D bar interaction; free parameters set by reproducing the X(3872) mass in the decay model of Section 4.4.
  • m_c-bar-c (bare c bar-c mass) = not quoted
    Bare mass of the c bar-c core before channel coupling; adjusted to place X(3872) near threshold in the coupled-channel models of Section 4.3.
  • g_sigma (sigma meson coupling) = 0.76 to 3.65
    Sigma-meson coupling varied in Section 5.3 to bracket short-range attraction uncertainty in the isovector channels.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Schrodinger equation and quantum mechanical coupled-channel formalism are valid for the D bar-D* systems.
    Used throughout Sections 4 and 5 to define bound states, scattering lengths, and wave functions.
  • domain assumption Heavy quark spin symmetry relates the D and D* couplings to the pion through a single axial coupling g_A.
    Section 2.2; without this, the P P* pi and P* P* pi vertices would have independent strengths.
  • domain assumption One-pion exchange with a dipole form factor and a subtracted contact term captures the relevant long-range interaction; shorter-range meson exchanges are effectively absorbed into the cutoff.
    Section 3.2; this modeling choice lets the paper compare OPEP-only results with deuteron data.
  • ad hoc to paper The c bar-c to D bar-D* transition potential is a Lorentzian in momentum space with cutoff Lambda_q = 0.5 GeV.
    Section 4.3; chosen to reproduce the absence of a chi_c1(2P) bump, not derived from first principles.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Heavy hadronic molecules with pion exchange and quark core couplings: a guide for practitioners." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/T6IS6IMG

@misc{pith2026190808790,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Heavy hadronic molecules with pion exchange and quark core couplings: a guide for practitioners},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/T6IS6IMG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08790}
}
abstract

We discuss selected and important features of hadronic molecules as one of promising forms of exotic hadrons near thresholds. Using examples of $D \bar D^*$ systems such as $X(3872)$ and $Z_c$, emphasis is put on the roles of the one pion exchange interaction between them and their coupling to intrinsic quark states. Thus hadronic molecules emerge as admixtures of the dominant long-range hadron structure and short-range quark structure. For the pion exchange interaction, properties of the tensor force are analyzed in detail. More coupled channels supply more attractions, and heavier constituents suppress kinetic energies, providing more chances to form hadronic molecules of heavy hadrons. Throughout this article, we show details of basic ideas and methods.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.08790 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Decomposition of two-body interaction into s, t, u and c (contact) channels. Microscopically, the pion couples to the constituent quarks that are dynamically generated by SSB. Combined with the quark model wave functions of hadrons, the coupling strengths as well as form factors are estimated, schematically by Vπhh0 = X i hh 0 |Vπqiqi |hi, (1) where the sum is taken over the light quarks (i) in the hadrons as shown … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Schematic view of a pion hadron (nucleon in this figure) coupling. σ · r type. This leads to the tensor force causing mixing of orbital motions of different angular momenta by two units. This provides extra attraction which contributes significantly to the formation of molecules. Although the importance of the tensor force has long been recognized in nuclear physics [27, 28], quantitative understanding has progresse… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Quark model diagram for the decay of D∗ → Dπ. The wave functions χi,f are written as a product of the plain wave for the center of mass and internal part including spin, φi,f (r) χi,f (t, X, r) = exp (−iωi,f t + iPi,f · X) φi,f (r) , (51) where ωi,f are the energies of the initial D¯ ∗ and final D¯ mesons. Expressing pi by the relative momentum pr as pi = m m + M Pi + pr , (52) we can perform the t and X-integral le… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (18 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: One meson exchange potential. The vertex structure of σ · q is needed for the one-pion exchange potential (OPEP) of the nucleon. For φφ or NN the line widths of bold or normal are irrelevant. It will become relevant when discussing the potential for P (∗)P (∗) . 3.2. O…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The spectrum of DD¯ ∗ and DDπ¯ . Actual case with isospin breaking (left) and a simplified one (right). ϵμqμ −ϵ* μ qμ x y D D D* D* ∑ p,p′ ,q D(p) + 2 D¯(p′) π(q) D(p) π(q) D¯(p′) = Im D¯ *(−p) D¯(p′) π(q) D(p) D*(−p′) D¯ *(−p) π(q) D¯(p′) D¯ *(−p) D(p) + P = 0 D¯ *(−p…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The optical theorem for a DD¯ ∗ bound state decaying into DDπ¯ . The three-body decay is computed by the diagrams in the first (upper) line of figure 6, which are for the decay of the quasi-bound state at rest (P = 0) into D(p), D¯(p 0 ), π(q). Note that there are two …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Boundary lines separating the regions where a bound state exists or not. The solid (i) and long-dashed (ii) lines are the results with and without the energy transfer, respectively. The dot-dashed line (iii) is the result without the D(∗)D¯(∗) channel (see the text for…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The central and tensor components of the OPEP for the X(3872) (152),  gA 2fπ 2 C(r; m,Λ) and  gA 2fπ 2 T(r; m,Λ) respectively, with various effective pion masses and (gA,Λ) = (0.55, 1.13 GeV). The solid, dashed and dashed-dot lines correspond to the potentials with…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The boundaries of the D(∗)D¯(∗) (solid line) and B(∗)B¯(∗) (dashed double￾dotted line) bound states in the (gA,Λ) plane. The boundary of the D(∗)D¯(∗) state is the same as the boundary (i) in figure 7. The vertical solid line shows the value of gA = 0.55, and the horiz…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (a) The D0D¯ ∗0 and (b) the D+D∗− wave function of X(3872) in the OPEP model; solid lines are for DD¯ ∗ ( 3S1), dashed lines for (3D1) and dotted lines for D∗D¯ ∗ ( 5D1). The long dashed lines are for those of [115], which corresponds the cc¯-model in tables 8 and 9, …
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The DD¯ ∗ wave function of X(3872) in the isospin basis. The solid (dashed) line is for the isospin 0 (1) wave function of the cc¯ model. The sign of the wave functions is taken to be positive at small r. (a) D(*)0 D¯(*)0 � � � � � � � ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� � [��] ���� …
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: (a) The D0D¯ ∗0 and (b) the D+D∗− wave function of X(3872) in the cc¯-OPEP model with the same convention as in figure 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: The B meson weak decay. See text. component is D0D¯ ∗0 while the D+D∗− component is considerably smaller because of the threshold difference. The amount of the cc¯ component is somewhat smaller but still sizable. The J/ψω and J/ψρ components are small comparing to the…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: The transfer strength from the cc¯ state to the final two-meson states. The energy E is the center of mass energy of the two-meson states. Figure (b) is the same as (a) but magnified at around the D0D¯ ∗0 threshold. Taken from [38]. Let us discuss the mechanism to hav…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: The transfer strength from the cc¯ state to the final J/ψω and J/ψρ states. Note that the energy abscissa is taken to be from 3870.8 to 3872 MeV. Final states are J/ψω (Solid lines), and J/ψρ (dashed lines). The coupling g 2 cc¯ is factored by 1.1, 1.05, 1, 0.95. The …
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Trial calculation to estimate the effects of constructing mesons’ width. The J/ψω channel is assumed to couple to the cc¯ core, and the width is enhanced by hand. (See text.) The solid line is for the final J/ψω fraction, the dashed line is for the final J/ψρ fraction…
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: The boundary lines of the isovector P (∗)P¯(∗) bound states in the (gA,Λ) plane for J P C = 0++, 1++ and 1+−. The results of the D(∗)D¯(∗) and B(∗)B¯(∗) states are shown by the solid and dashed lines, respectively. The right side beyond the line is the bound region, w…
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: The boundary lines of the D(∗)D¯(∗) bound states J P C = 1++ in the (gA,Λ) plane for the isospin I = 1 and 0. The solid and dashed lines show the results for I = 1 and for I = 0, respectively, which are obtained in figure 17 and figure 7. The right side beyond the lin…
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: The boundary of the isovector D(∗)D¯(∗) bound state with Vπ and Vσ for (i) J P C = 0++, (ii) 1++ and (iii) 1+− in the (gA,Λ) plane. The solid line shows the result for gσ = 0, namely only with Vπ, while the dashed and dashed-dot lines are the results for gσ = 0.76 and…
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: The boundary of the isovector B(∗)B¯(∗) bound state for (i) J P C = 0++, (ii) 1++ and (iii) 1+− in the (gA,Λ) plane. The same convention is used as figure 19, while the vertical and horizontal solid lines show the values at gA = 0.55 and Λ = ΛB = 0.88 GeV, respectivel…
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: The boundary of the isovector (i) D(∗)D¯(∗) and (ii) B(∗)B¯(∗) bound states in the (gσ,Λ) plane. The vertical lines show the values at gs = 0.76 and gs = 3.65. The horizontal lines show the values at Λ = ΛD = 0.92 GeV for (i) D(∗)D¯(∗) and at Λ = ΛB = 0.88 GeV for (ii…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 10 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. $D\bar{D}^\ast$-$\pi J/\psi$ scatterings of coupled channels for $Z_c(3900)$ channel

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Quark-exchange interactions at short distances dominate the coupled-channel scattering amplitudes for Zc(3900) over meson exchanges in an effective hadron-quark model.

  2. Tetraquarks in the Born-Oppenheimer approximation

    hep-ph 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An extended Born-Oppenheimer tetraquark model yields a compact shallow bound state for X(3872) and a radiative decay ratio R=1.4±0.3, consistent with LHCb.

  3. On the nature of fully-charmed four-quark exotic state $X(6900)$ from its photoproduction off nuclei

    hep-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Nuclear photoproduction of X(6900) off carbon and tungsten is predicted to differ by 10-30% between compact-tetraquark, J/psi-psi(3770) molecular, and hybrid interpretations, potentially allowing future electron-ion c...

  4. Possibility of the antibottom-strange molecular pentaquarks near $ B\Sigma$ and $ B^*\Sigma$ thresholds

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Coupled-channel OBE dynamics with S–D mixing produce three near-threshold poles dominated by BΣ/B*Σ that should show as narrow enhancements in open Bs0N, BΛ and B*Λ channels.

  5. Symmetry Analysis of Compact Tetraquark States and Implications for the Fully Charmed Candidates $X(6600)$, $X(6900)$, and $X(7100)$

    hep-ph 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Symmetry analysis of compact tetraquarks shows low-energy states favor J^P=2+ and places X(6600), X(6900), X(7100) among the lower levels of the fully charmed spectrum.

  6. Hidden-Charm Tetraquarks in a Mixture Model: Coupled-Channel Analysis with $c\bar{c}$ and Hadronic Molecular Components

    hep-ph 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A coupled-channel mixture model fitted to the X(3872) and Z(3930) masses predicts the X(3860) at about 3867 MeV, dominated by the charmonium core.

  7. Effect of a repulsive three-body interaction on the $DD^{(*)}K$ molecule

    nucl-th 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Repulsive three-body interactions gradually expand DD(∗)K molecules and eventually dissociate them into a D(∗)K bound pair plus a distant D meson.

  8. Radiative decays of $X(3872)$ within $D{\bar D}^*$ molecular framework

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Using nonrelativistic effective field theory, the X(3872) is treated as a D*D molecule to predict radiative decay widths to D D gamma, finding a strong neutral-over-charged hierarchy and quantifying D D rescattering effects.

  9. Production mechanism of doubly charmed exotic mesons $T_{cc}$

    hep-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A coupled-channel model generates the Tcc(3875)+ as an isovector DD* molecule and predicts three additional J=1 tetraquark states, including a negative-parity resonance.

  10. Radiative decay of $\chi_{c1}$ states in effective Lagrangian approach

    hep-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A triangle-loop effective Lagrangian model predicts chi_c1(3872) radiative branching fractions tens of times above LHCb measurements, supporting a non-charmonium interpretation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages · cited by 10 Pith papers

  1. [183]

    Yamaguchi Y, Takeuchi S, Hosaka A and Takizawa M in preparation

  2. [55]

    Yasui S and Sudoh K 2009 Phys. Rev. D80 034008 (Preprint 0906.1452)

    arXiv 2009

  3. [1]

    (Belle) 2003 Phys

    Choi S K et al. (Belle) 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 262001 (Preprint hep-ex/0309032)

    arXiv 2003

  4. [2]

    (BaBar) 2005 Phys

    Aubert B et al. (BaBar) 2005 Phys. Rev. D71 031501 (Preprint hep-ex/0412051)

    arXiv 2005

  5. [3]

    8 214–215

    Gell-Mann M 1964 Phys.Lett. 8 214–215

    1964

  6. [4]

    (LHCb) 2013 Phys

    Aaij R et al. (LHCb) 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 222001 (Preprint 1302.6269)

    arXiv 2013

  7. [5]

    (Particle Data Group) 2018 Phys

    Tanabashi M et al. (Particle Data Group) 2018 Phys. Rev. D98 030001

    2018

  8. [6]

    2011 Eur

    Brambilla N et al. 2011 Eur. Phys. J. C71 1534 (Preprint 1010.5827)

    arXiv 2011

Show all 300 references
  1. [7]

    Jaffe R L 1977 Phys.Rev. D15 267

    1977

  2. [8]

    Jaffe R L 1977 Phys.Rev. D15 281

    1977

  3. [9]

    Maiani L, Piccinini F, Polosa A D and Riquer V 2005 Phys. Rev. D71 014028 ( Preprint hep-ph/0412098)

    2005 arXiv

  4. [10]

    Terasaki K 2007 Prog. Theor. Phys. 118 821–826 (Preprint 0706.3944)

    2007 arXiv

  5. [11]

    2 425–428

    Dalitz R and Tuan S 1959 Phys.Rev.Lett. 2 425–428

    1959

  6. [12]

    Tornqvist N A 1994 Z. Phys. C61 525–537 (Preprint hep-ph/9310247)

    1994 arXiv

  7. [13]

    B628 215–222 (Preprint hep-ph/0507199)

    Close F E and Page P R 2005 Phys.Lett. B628 215–222 (Preprint hep-ph/0507199)

    2005 arXiv

  8. [14]

    B631 164–169 (Preprint hep-ph/0507119)

    Kou E and Pene O 2005 Phys.Lett. B631 164–169 (Preprint hep-ph/0507119)

    2005 arXiv

  9. [15]

    Voloshin M B 2013 Phys. Rev. D87 091501 (Preprint 1304.0380)

    2013 arXiv

  10. [16]

    Karliner M, Rosner J L and Skwarnicki T 2018 Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 68 17–44 (Preprint 1711.10626)

    2018 arXiv

  11. [17]

    Karliner M 2019 JPS Conf. Proc. 26 011005

    2019

  12. [18]

    De Rujula A, Georgi H and Glashow S 1977 Phys.Rev.Lett. 38 317

    1977

  13. [19]

    (LHCb) 2019 Phys

    Aaij R et al. (LHCb) 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 222001 (Preprint 1904.03947)

    2019 arXiv

  14. [20]

    1 121–146

    Hoyle F 1954 Astrophys.J.Suppl. 1 121–146

    1954

  15. [21]

    E68 464–475

    Ikeda K, Takigawa N and Horiuchi H 1968 Progress of Theoretical Physics Suppl. E68 464–475

    1968

  16. [22]

    322 120–163 (Preprint cond-mat/0612123)

    Braaten E and Hammer H W 2007 Annals Phys. 322 120–163 (Preprint cond-mat/0612123)

    2007 arXiv

  17. [23]

    Naidon P and Endo S 2017 Rept. Prog. Phys. 80 056001 (Preprint 1610.09805)

    2017 arXiv

  18. [24]

    Guo F K, Hanhart C, Meißner U G, Wang Q, Zhao Q and Zou B S 2018 Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 015004 (Preprint 1705.00141)

    2018 arXiv

  19. [25]

    Nambu Y and Jona-Lasinio G 1961 Phys. Rev. 122 345–358

    1961

  20. [26]

    Nambu Y and Jona-Lasinio G 1961 Phys. Rev. 124 246–254 Hadronic molecules with pion exchange and quark core 67

    1961

  21. [27]

    Nagata S, Sasakawa T, Sawada T and Tamagaki R 1959 Progress of Theoretical Physics 22 274–298

    1959

  22. [28]

    Terasawa T 1960 Progress of Theoretical Physics 23 87–105

    1960

  23. [29]

    Pieper S C and Wiringa R B 2001 Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 51 53–90 ( Preprint nucl-th/ 0103005)

    2001

  24. [30]

    Carlson J, Gandolfi S, Pederiva F, Pieper S C, Schiavilla R, Schmidt K E and Wiringa R B 2015 Rev. Mod. Phys. 87 1067 (Preprint 1412.3081)

    2015 arXiv

  25. [31]

    Otsuka T, Suzuki T, Fujimoto R, Grawe H and Akaishi Y 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 232502

    2005

  26. [32]

    Myo T, Kato K, Toki H and Ikeda K 2007 Phys. Rev. C76 024305 (Preprint 0706.2911)

    2007 arXiv

  27. [33]

    Weinberg S 1963 Phys. Rev. 130 776–783

    1963

  28. [34]

    Weinberg S 1965 Phys. Rev. 137 B672–B678

    1965

  29. [35]

    Nagahiro H and Hosaka A 2013 Phys. Rev. C88 055203 (Preprint 1307.2031)

    2013 arXiv

  30. [36]

    Nagahiro H and Hosaka A 2014 Phys. Rev. C90 065201 (Preprint 1406.3684)

    2014 arXiv

  31. [37]

    Sekihara T, Hyodo T and Jido D 2015 PTEP 2015 063D04 (Preprint 1411.2308)

    2015 arXiv

  32. [38]

    Takeuchi S, Shimizu K and Takizawa M 2014 PTEP 2014 123D01 [Erratum: PTEP2015,no.7,079203(2015)] (Preprint 1408.0973)

    2015 arXiv

  33. [39]

    Casalbuoni R, Deandrea A, Di Bartolomeo N, Gatto R, Feruglio F and Nardulli G 1997 Phys. Rept. 281 145–238 (Preprint hep-ph/9605342)

    1997 arXiv

  34. [40]

    Manohar A V and Wise M B 2000 Heavy quark physics (Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press)

    2000

  35. [41]

    Weinberg S 1968 Phys. Rev. 166 1568–1577

    1968

  36. [42]

    Coleman S R, Wess J and Zumino B 1969 Phys. Rev. 177 2239–2247

    1969

  37. [43]

    Callan Jr C G, Coleman S R, Wess J and Zumino B 1969 Phys. Rev. 177 2247–2250

    1969

  38. [44]

    Hosaka A and Toki H 2001 Quarks, baryons and chiral symmetry (Singapore, Singapore: World Scientific)

    2001

  39. [45]

    Bando M, Kugo T, Uehara S, Yamawaki K and Yanagida T 1985 Phys. Rev. Lett. 54 1215

    1985

  40. [46]

    Bando M, Kugo T and Yamawaki K 1988 Phys. Rept. 164 217–314

    1988

  41. [47]

    Nagahiro H, Yasui S, Hosaka A, Oka M and Noumi H 2017 Phys. Rev. D95 014023 (Preprint 1609.01085)

    2017 arXiv

  42. [48]

    Cohen T D and Hansen J M 1998 Phys. Lett. B440 233–238 (Preprint nucl-th/9808006)

    1998 arXiv

  43. [49]

    Epelbaum E and Gegelia J 2009 Eur. Phys. J. A41 341–354 (Preprint 0906.3822)

    2009 arXiv

  44. [50]

    Nagels M M, Rijken T A and de Swart J J 1977 Phys. Rev. D15 2547

    1977

  45. [51]

    Rijken T A, Stoks V G J and Yamamoto Y 1999 Phys. Rev. C59 21–40 ( Preprint nucl-th/ 9807082)

    1999

  46. [52]

    Machleidt R, Holinde K and Elster C 1987 Phys. Rept. 149 1–89

    1987

  47. [53]

    5.M42E75::1988

    Ericson T E O and Weise W 1988 Pions and Nuclei vol 74 (Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press) ISBN 0198520085 URL http://www-spires.fnal.gov/spires/find/books/www?cl=QC793. 5.M42E75::1988

    1988

  48. [54]

    Yamaguchi Y, Ohkoda S, Yasui S and Hosaka A 2011 Phys. Rev. D84 014032 ( Preprint 1105.0734)

    2011 arXiv

  49. [56]

    Yamaguchi Y, Ohkoda S, Yasui S and Hosaka A 2012 Phys. Rev. D85 054003 ( Preprint 1111.2691)

    2012 arXiv

  50. [57]

    Ohkoda S, Yamaguchi Y, Yasui S, Sudoh K and Hosaka A 2012 Phys. Rev. D86 014004 (Preprint 1111.2921)

    2012 arXiv

  51. [58]

    Ohkoda S, Yamaguchi Y, Yasui S, Sudoh K and Hosaka A 2012 Phys. Rev. D86 034019 (Preprint 1202.0760)

    2012 arXiv

  52. [59]

    Yamaguchi Y, Ohkoda S, Yasui S and Hosaka A 2013 Phys. Rev. D87 074019 ( Preprint 1301.4557)

    2013 arXiv

  53. [60]

    Yamaguchi Y, Yasui S and Hosaka A 2014 Nucl. Phys. A927 110–118 (Preprint 1309.4324)

    2014 arXiv

  54. [61]

    Geng L S, Lu J X, Valderrama M P and Ren X L 2018 Phys. Rev. D97 091501 ( Preprint Hadronic molecules with pion exchange and quark core 68 1705.00516)

    2018 arXiv

  55. [62]

    Peskin M E and Schroeder D V 1995 An Introduction to quantum field theory (Reading, USA: Addison-Wesley) ISBN 9780201503975, 0201503972 URL http://www.slac.stanford.edu/ ~mpeskin/QFT.html

    1995

  56. [63]

    Swanson E S 2004 Phys. Lett. B588 189–195 (Preprint hep-ph/0311229)

    2004 arXiv

  57. [64]

    Thomas C E and Close F E 2008 Phys. Rev. D78 034007 (Preprint 0805.3653)

    2008 arXiv

  58. [65]

    (CDF) 2004 Phys

    Acosta D et al. (CDF) 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 072001 (Preprint hep-ex/0312021)

    2004 arXiv

  59. [66]

    (D0) 2004 Phys

    Abazov V M et al. (D0) 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 162002 (Preprint hep-ex/0405004)

    2004 arXiv

  60. [67]

    (BaBar) 2005 Phys

    Aubert B et al. (BaBar) 2005 Phys. Rev. D71 071103 (Preprint hep-ex/0406022)

    2005 arXiv

  61. [68]

    (LHCb) 2012 Eur

    Aaij R et al. (LHCb) 2012 Eur. Phys. J. C72 1972 (Preprint 1112.5310)

    2012 arXiv

  62. [69]

    (CMS) 2013 JHEP 04 154 (Preprint 1302.3968)

    Chatrchyan S et al. (CMS) 2013 JHEP 04 154 (Preprint 1302.3968)

    2013 arXiv

  63. [70]

    (ATLAS) 2017 JHEP 01 117 (Preprint 1610.09303)

    Aaboud M et al. (ATLAS) 2017 JHEP 01 117 (Preprint 1610.09303)

    2017 arXiv

  64. [71]

    (BESIII) 2014 Phys

    Ablikim M et al. (BESIII) 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 092001 (Preprint 1310.4101)

    2014 arXiv

  65. [72]

    2011 Phys

    Choi S K et al. 2011 Phys. Rev. D84 052004 (Preprint 1107.0163)

    2011 arXiv

  66. [73]

    (CDF) 2009 Phys

    Aaltonen T et al. (CDF) 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 152001 (Preprint 0906.5218)

    2009 arXiv

  67. [74]

    (Belle) 2010 Phys

    Aushev T et al. (Belle) 2010 Phys. Rev. D81 031103 (Preprint 0810.0358)

    2010 arXiv

  68. [75]

    (BaBar) 2008 Phys

    Aubert B et al. (BaBar) 2008 Phys. Rev. D77 011102 (Preprint 0708.1565)

    2008 arXiv

  69. [76]

    (Belle) 2006 Phys

    Gokhroo G et al. (Belle) 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 162002 (Preprint hep-ex/0606055)

    2006 arXiv

  70. [77]

    (CDF) 2007 Phys

    Abulencia A et al. (CDF) 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 132002 (Preprint hep-ex/0612053)

    2007 arXiv

  71. [78]

    (BaBar) 2006 Phys

    Aubert B et al. (BaBar) 2006 Phys. Rev. D74 071101 (Preprint hep-ex/0607050)

    2006 arXiv

  72. [79]

    (BaBar) 2009 Phys

    Aubert B et al. (BaBar) 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 132001 (Preprint 0809.0042)

    2009 arXiv

  73. [80]

    (Belle) 2011 Phys

    Bhardwaj V et al. (Belle) 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 091803 (Preprint 1105.0177)

    2011 arXiv

  74. [81]

    (LHCb) 2014 Nucl

    Aaij R et al. (LHCb) 2014 Nucl. Phys. B886 665–680 (Preprint 1404.0275)

    2014 arXiv

  75. [82]

    (LHCb) 2015 Phys

    Aaij R et al. (LHCb) 2015 Phys. Rev. D92 011102 (Preprint 1504.06339)

    2015 arXiv

  76. [83]

    (BaBar) 2008 Phys

    Aubert B et al. (BaBar) 2008 Phys. Rev. D77 111101 (Preprint 0803.2838)

    2008 arXiv

  77. [84]

    (BESIII) 2019 Phys

    Ablikim M et al. (BESIII) 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 232002 (Preprint 1903.04695)

    2019 arXiv

  78. [85]

    Barnes T and Godfrey S 2004 Phys. Rev. D69 054008 (Preprint hep-ph/0311162)

    2004 arXiv

  79. [86]

    Donoghue J F, Golowich E and Holstein B R 1992 Camb. Monogr. Part. Phys. Nucl. Phys. Cosmol. 2 1–540 [Camb. Monogr. Part. Phys. Nucl. Phys. Cosmol.35(2014)]

    2014

  80. [87]

    Bali G S 2001 Phys. Rept. 343 1–136 (Preprint hep-ph/0001312)

    2001 arXiv

  81. [88]

    Barnes T, Godfrey S and Swanson E S 2005 Phys. Rev. D72 054026 (Preprint hep-ph/0505002)

    2005 arXiv

  82. [89]

    Ebert D, Faustov R N and Galkin V O 2006 Phys. Lett. B634 214–219 ( Preprint hep-ph/ 0512230)

    2006

  83. [90]

    Dubnicka S, Dubnickova A Z, Ivanov M A and Korner J G 2010Phys. Rev. D81 114007 (Preprint 1004.1291)

    arXiv

  84. [91]

    Kim H, Kim K S, Cheoun M K, Jido D and Oka M 2016 Eur. Phys. J. A52 184 ( Preprint 1602.07540)

    2016 arXiv

  85. [92]

    Close F E and Page P R 2004 Phys. Lett. B578 119–123 (Preprint hep-ph/0309253)

    2004 arXiv

  86. [93]

    Voloshin M B 2004 Phys. Lett. B579 316–320 (Preprint hep-ph/0309307)

    2004 arXiv

  87. [94]

    Tornqvist N A 2004 Phys. Lett. B590 209–215 (Preprint hep-ph/0402237)

    2004 arXiv

  88. [95]

    AlFiky M T, Gabbiani F and Petrov A A 2006 Phys. Lett. B640 238–245 ( Preprint hep-ph/ 0506141)

    2006

  89. [96]

    Ding G J, Liu J F and Yan M L 2009 Phys. Rev. D79 054005 (Preprint 0901.0426)

    2009 arXiv

  90. [97]

    Lee I W, Faessler A, Gutsche T and Lyubovitskij V E 2009 Phys. Rev. D80 094005 (Preprint 0910.1009)

    2009 arXiv

  91. [98]

    Gamermann D, Nieves J, Oset E and Ruiz Arriola E 2010 Phys. Rev. D81 014029 ( Preprint 0911.4407)

    2010 arXiv

  92. [99]

    Li N and Zhu S L 2012 Phys. Rev. D86 074022 (Preprint 1207.3954)

    2012 arXiv

  93. [100]

    Guo F K, Hidalgo-Duque C, Nieves J and Valderrama M P 2013Phys. Rev. D88 054007 (Preprint 1303.6608)

    arXiv

  94. [101]

    Wang P and Wang X G 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 042002 (Preprint 1304.0846) Hadronic molecules with pion exchange and quark core 69

    2013 arXiv

  95. [102]

    Baru V, Epelbaum E, Filin A A, Hanhart C, Meissner U G and Nefediev A V 2013 Phys. Lett. B726 537–543 (Preprint 1306.4108)

    2013 arXiv

  96. [103]

    Garzon E J, Molina R, Hosaka A and Oset E 2014 Phys. Rev. D89 014504 (Preprint 1310.0972)

    2014 arXiv

  97. [104]

    Jansen M, Hammer H W and Jia Y 2014 Phys. Rev. D89 014033 (Preprint 1310.6937)

    2014 arXiv

  98. [105]

    Wang Z G and Huang T 2014 Eur. Phys. J. C74 2891 (Preprint 1312.7489)

    2014 arXiv

  99. [106]

    Tomaradze A, Dobbs S, Xiao T and Seth K K 2015Phys. Rev. D91 011102 (Preprint 1501.01658)

    arXiv

  100. [107]

    Baru V, Epelbaum E, Filin A A, Guo F K, Hammer H W, Hanhart C, Meißner U G and Nefediev A V 2015 Phys. Rev. D91 034002 (Preprint 1501.02924)

    2015 arXiv

  101. [108]

    Braaten E 2015 Phys. Rev. D91 114007 (Preprint 1503.04791)

    2015 arXiv

  102. [109]

    Wang Z Y, Qi J J, Guo X H and Wang C 2018 Phys. Rev. D97 016015 (Preprint 1710.07424)

    2018 arXiv

  103. [110]

    Schmidt M, Jansen M and Hammer H W 2018 Phys. Rev. D98 014032 (Preprint 1804.00375)

    2018 arXiv

  104. [111]

    Matheus R D, Navarra F S, Nielsen M and Zanetti C M 2009 Phys. Rev. D80 056002 (Preprint 0907.2683)

    2009 arXiv

  105. [112]

    Danilkin I V and Simonov Yu A 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 102002 (Preprint 1006.0211)

    2010 arXiv

  106. [113]

    Coito S, Rupp G and van Beveren E 2011 Eur. Phys. J. C71 1762 (Preprint 1008.5100)

    2011 arXiv

  107. [114]

    Coito S, Rupp G and van Beveren E 2013 Eur. Phys. J. C73 2351 (Preprint 1212.0648)

    2013 arXiv

  108. [115]

    Takizawa M and Takeuchi S 2013 PTEP 2013 093D01 (Preprint 1206.4877)

    2013 arXiv

  109. [116]

    Ferretti J, Galat` a G and Santopinto E 2013Phys. Rev. C88 015207 (Preprint 1302.6857)

    arXiv

  110. [117]

    Chen W, Jin H y, Kleiv R T, Steele T G, Wang M and Xu Q 2013 Phys. Rev. D88 045027 (Preprint 1305.0244)

    2013 arXiv

  111. [118]

    Ferretti J, Galat` a G and Santopinto E 2014Phys. Rev. D90 054010 (Preprint 1401.4431)

    arXiv

  112. [119]

    Zhou Z Y and Xiao Z 2017 Phys. Rev. D96 054031 [Erratum: Phys. Rev.D96,no.9,099905(2017)] (Preprint 1704.04438)

    2017 arXiv

  113. [120]

    Yang Y B, Chen Y, Gui L C, Liu C, Liu Y B, Liu Z, Ma J P and Zhang J B (CLQCD) 2013 Phys. Rev. D87 014501 (Preprint 1206.2086)

    2013 arXiv

  114. [121]

    Prelovsek S and Leskovec L 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 192001 (Preprint 1307.5172)

    2013 arXiv

  115. [122]

    Lee S H, Detar C, Mohler D and Na H (Fermilab Lattice, MILC) 2014 PoS LA TTICE2014125

    2014

  116. [123]

    Padmanath M, Lang C B and Prelovsek S 2015 Phys. Rev. D92 034501 (Preprint 1503.03257)

    2015 arXiv

  117. [124]

    (Belle) 2005 Evidence for X(3872) → gamma J/psi and the sub-threshold decay X(3872)→ omega J/psi Lepton and photon interactions at high energies

    Abe K et al. (Belle) 2005 Evidence for X(3872) → gamma J/psi and the sub-threshold decay X(3872)→ omega J/psi Lepton and photon interactions at high energies. Proceedings, 22nd International Symposium, LP 2005, Uppsala, Sweden, June 30-July 5, 2005 (Preprint hep-ex/0505037)

    2005 arXiv

  118. [125]

    (BaBar) 2010 Phys

    del Amo Sanchez P et al. (BaBar) 2010 Phys. Rev. D82 011101 (Preprint 1005.5190)

    2010 arXiv

  119. [126]

    Braaten E and Kusunoki M 2005 Phys. Rev. D72 054022 (Preprint hep-ph/0507163)

    2005 arXiv

  120. [127]

    Suzuki M 2005 Phys. Rev. D72 114013 (Preprint hep-ph/0508258)

    2005 arXiv

  121. [128]

    Terasaki K 2010 Prog. Theor. Phys. 122 1285–1290 (Preprint 0904.3368)

    2010 arXiv

  122. [129]

    Zhou Z Y and Xiao Z 2018 Phys. Rev. D97 034011 (Preprint 1711.01930)

    2018 arXiv

  123. [130]

    (BESIII) 2019 Phys

    Ablikim M et al. (BESIII) 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 202001 (Preprint 1901.03992)

    2019 arXiv

  124. [131]

    Braaten E, Kusunoki M and Nussinov S 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 162001 ( Preprint hep-ph/ 0404161)

    2004

  125. [132]

    Braaten E and Kusunoki M 2005 Phys. Rev. D71 074005 (Preprint hep-ph/0412268)

    2005 arXiv

  126. [133]

    Bignamini C, Grinstein B, Piccinini F, Polosa A D and Sabelli C 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 162001 (Preprint 0906.0882)

    2009 arXiv

  127. [134]

    Zanetti C M, Nielsen M and Matheus R D 2011 Phys. Lett. B702 359–363 (Preprint 1105.1343)

    2011 arXiv

  128. [135]

    Cho S and Lee S H 2013 Phys. Rev. C88 054901 (Preprint 1302.6381)

    2013 arXiv

  129. [136]

    Denig A, Guo F K, Hanhart C and Nefediev A V 2014 Phys. Lett. B736 221–225 ( Preprint 1405.3404)

    2014 arXiv

  130. [137]

    Martinez Torres A, Khemchandani K P, Navarra F S, Nielsen M and Abreu L M 2014 Phys. Rev. D90 114023 [Erratum: Phys. Rev.D93,no.5,059902(2016)] ( Preprint 1405.7583)

    2016 arXiv

  131. [138]

    Larionov A B, Strikman M and Bleicher M 2015 Phys. Lett. B749 35–43 (Preprint 1502.03311)

    2015 arXiv

  132. [139]

    Wang W and Zhao Q 2016 Phys. Lett. B755 261–264 (Preprint 1512.03123) Hadronic molecules with pion exchange and quark core 70

    2016 arXiv

  133. [140]

    Abreu L M 2016 PTEP 2016 103B01 (Preprint 1608.08165)

    2016 arXiv

  134. [141]

    Meng C, Han H and Chao K T 2017 Phys. Rev. D96 074014 (Preprint 1304.6710)

    2017 arXiv

  135. [142]

    Albaladejo M, Guo F K, Hanhart C, Meißner U G, Nieves J, Nogga A and Yang Z 2017 Chin. Phys. C41 121001 (Preprint 1709.09101)

    2017 arXiv

  136. [143]

    Esposito A, Grinstein B, Maiani L, Piccinini F, Pilloni A, Polosa A D and Riquer V 2018 Chin. Phys. C42 114107 (Preprint 1709.09631)

    2018 arXiv

  137. [144]

    Esposito A, Pilloni A and Polosa A D 2017 Phys. Rept. 668 1–97 (Preprint 1611.07920)

    2017 arXiv

  138. [145]

    Swanson E S 2004 Phys. Lett. B598 197–202 (Preprint hep-ph/0406080)

    2004 arXiv

  139. [146]

    Navarra F S and Nielsen M 2006 Phys. Lett. B639 272–277 (Preprint hep-ph/0605038)

    2006 arXiv

  140. [147]

    Braaten E and Lu M 2007 Phys. Rev. D76 094028 (Preprint 0709.2697)

    2007 arXiv

  141. [148]

    Dubynskiy S and Voloshin M B 2008 Phys. Rev. D77 014013 (Preprint 0709.4474)

    2008 arXiv

  142. [149]

    Braaten E and Lu M 2008 Phys. Rev. D77 014029 (Preprint 0710.5482)

    2008 arXiv

  143. [150]

    Fleming S and Mehen T 2008 Phys. Rev. D78 094019 (Preprint 0807.2674)

    2008 arXiv

  144. [151]

    Artoisenet P, Braaten E and Kang D 2010 Phys. Rev. D82 014013 (Preprint 1005.2167)

    2010 arXiv

  145. [152]

    Fleming S and Mehen T 2012 Phys. Rev. D85 014016 (Preprint 1110.0265)

    2012 arXiv

  146. [153]

    Braaten E and Kang D 2013 Phys. Rev. D88 014028 (Preprint 1305.5564)

    2013 arXiv

  147. [154]

    Guo F K, Hidalgo-Duque C, Nieves J, Ozpineci A and Valderrama M P 2014 Eur. Phys. J. C74 2885 (Preprint 1404.1776)

    2014 arXiv

  148. [155]

    Meng C, Sanz-Cillero J J, Shi M, Yao D L and Zheng H Q 2015 Phys. Rev. D92 034020 (Preprint 1411.3106)

    2015 arXiv

  149. [156]

    Mehen T 2015 Phys. Rev. D92 034019 (Preprint 1503.02719)

    2015 arXiv

  150. [157]

    Kang X W and Oller J A 2017 Eur. Phys. J. C77 399 (Preprint 1612.08420)

    2017 arXiv

  151. [158]

    Ferretti J and Santopinto E 2019 Phys. Lett. B789 550–555 (Preprint 1806.02489)

    2019 arXiv

  152. [159]

    Colangelo P, De Fazio F and Nicotri S 2007Phys. Lett. B650 166–171 (Preprint hep-ph/0701052)

    arXiv

  153. [160]

    Dong Y b, Faessler A, Gutsche T and Lyubovitskij V E 2008 Phys. Rev. D77 094013 (Preprint 0802.3610)

    2008 arXiv

  154. [161]

    Nielsen M and Zanetti C M 2010 Phys. Rev. D82 116002 (Preprint 1006.0467)

    2010 arXiv

  155. [162]

    Wang T H and Wang G L 2011 Phys. Lett. B697 233–237 (Preprint 1006.3363)

    2011 arXiv

  156. [163]

    Harada M and Ma Y L 2011 Prog. Theor. Phys. 126 91–113 (Preprint 1010.3607)

    2011 arXiv

  157. [164]

    Mehen T and Springer R 2011 Phys. Rev. D83 094009 (Preprint 1101.5175)

    2011 arXiv

  158. [165]

    Dubnicka S, Dubnickova A Z, Ivanov M A, Koerner J G, Santorelli P and Saidullaeva G G 2011 Phys. Rev. D84 014006 (Preprint 1104.3974)

    2011 arXiv

  159. [166]

    Ke H W and Li X Q 2011 Phys. Rev. D84 114026 (Preprint 1107.0443)

    2011 arXiv

  160. [167]

    Badalian A M, Orlovsky V D, Simonov Yu A and Bakker B L G 2012 Phys. Rev. D85 114002 (Preprint 1202.4882)

    2012 arXiv

  161. [168]

    Margaryan A and Springer R P 2013 Phys. Rev. D88 014017 (Preprint 1304.8101)

    2013 arXiv

  162. [169]

    Guo F K, Hanhart C, Meissner U G, Wang Q and Zhao Q 2013 Phys. Lett. B725 127–133 (Preprint 1306.3096)

    2013 arXiv

  163. [170]

    Guo F K, Hanhart C, Kalashnikova Yu S, Meißner U G and Nefediev A V 2015 Phys. Lett. B742 394–398 (Preprint 1410.6712)

    2015 arXiv

  164. [171]

    Cardoso M, Rupp G and van Beveren E 2015 Eur. Phys. J. C75 26 (Preprint 1411.1654)

    2015 arXiv

  165. [172]

    Badalian A M, Simonov Yu A and Bakker B L G 2015 Phys. Rev. D91 056001 ( Preprint 1501.01168)

    2015 arXiv

  166. [173]

    Takeuchi S, Takizawa M and Shimizu K 2017 JPS Conf. Proc. 17 112001 (Preprint 1602.04297)

    2017 arXiv

  167. [174]

    Swanson E S 2006 Phys. Rept. 429 243–305 (Preprint hep-ph/0601110)

    2006 arXiv

  168. [175]

    Godfrey S and Olsen S L 2008 Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 58 51–73 (Preprint 0801.3867)

    2008 arXiv

  169. [176]

    Phys.(Beijing) 10 121–154 (Preprint 1411.7738)

    Olsen S L 2015 Front. Phys.(Beijing) 10 121–154 (Preprint 1411.7738)

    2015 arXiv

  170. [177]

    Hosaka A, Iijima T, Miyabayashi K, Sakai Y and Yasui S 2016 PTEP 2016 062C01 (Preprint 1603.09229)

    2016 arXiv

  171. [178]

    Chen H X, Chen W, Liu X and Zhu S L 2016 Phys. Rept. 639 1–121 (Preprint 1601.02092)

    2016 arXiv

  172. [179]

    Lebed R F, Mitchell R E and Swanson E S 2017 Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 93 143–194 (Preprint Hadronic molecules with pion exchange and quark core 71 1610.04528)

    2017 arXiv

  173. [180]

    Ali A, Lange J S and Stone S 2017 Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 97 123–198 (Preprint 1706.00610)

    2017 arXiv

  174. [181]

    Godfrey S and Isgur N 1985 Phys. Rev. D32 189–231

    1985

  175. [182]

    Achasov N N and Rogozina E V 2015 Mod. Phys. Lett. A30 1550181 (Preprint 1501.03583)

    2015 arXiv

  176. [184]

    (Particle Data Group) 2014 Chin

    Olive K A et al. (Particle Data Group) 2014 Chin. Phys. C38 090001

    2014

  177. [185]

    Hanhart C, Kalashnikova Yu S, Kudryavtsev A E and Nefediev A V 2007 Phys. Rev. D76 034007 (Preprint 0704.0605)

    2007 arXiv

  178. [186]

    Voloshin M B 2007 Phys. Rev. D76 014007 (Preprint 0704.3029)

    2007 arXiv

  179. [187]

    Kalashnikova Yu S and Nefediev A V 2009 Phys. Rev. D80 074004 (Preprint 0907.4901)

    2009 arXiv

  180. [188]

    55 779–782

    Takizawa M, Takeuchi S and Shimizu K 2014 Few Body Syst. 55 779–782

    2014

  181. [189]

    (BESIII) 2013 Phys

    Ablikim M et al. (BESIII) 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 252001 (Preprint 1303.5949)

    2013 arXiv

  182. [190]

    (Belle) 2013 Phys

    Liu Z Q et al. (Belle) 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 252002 (Preprint 1304.0121)

    2013 arXiv

  183. [191]

    Xiao T, Dobbs S, Tomaradze A and Seth K K 2013 Phys. Lett. B727 366–370 ( Preprint 1304.3036)

    2013 arXiv

  184. [192]

    (BESIII) 2014 Phys

    Ablikim M et al. (BESIII) 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 022001 (Preprint 1310.1163)

    2014 arXiv

  185. [193]

    (BESIII) 2017 Phys

    Ablikim M et al. (BESIII) 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 072001 (Preprint 1706.04100)

    2017 arXiv

  186. [194]

    (BESIII) 2013 Phys

    Ablikim M et al. (BESIII) 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 242001 (Preprint 1309.1896)

    2013 arXiv

  187. [195]

    (BESIII) 2015 Phys

    Ablikim M et al. (BESIII) 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 112003 (Preprint 1506.06018)

    2015 arXiv

  188. [196]

    (BESIII) 2015 Phys

    Ablikim M et al. (BESIII) 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 222002 (Preprint 1509.05620)

    2015 arXiv

  189. [197]

    (Belle) 2014 Phys

    Chilikin K et al. (Belle) 2014 Phys. Rev. D90 112009 (Preprint 1408.6457)

    2014 arXiv

  190. [198]

    (LHCb) 2016 Phys

    Aaij R et al. (LHCb) 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 082003 [Addendum: Phys. Rev. Lett.118,119901(2017)] (Preprint 1606.06999)

    2017 arXiv

  191. [199]

    (LHCb) 2019 Phys

    Aaij R et al. (LHCb) 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 152002 (Preprint 1901.05745)

    2019 arXiv

  192. [200]

    (Belle) 2008 Phys

    Choi S K et al. (Belle) 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 142001 (Preprint 0708.1790)

    2008 arXiv

  193. [201]

    (Belle) 2009 Phys

    Mizuk R et al. (Belle) 2009 Phys. Rev. D80 031104 (Preprint 0905.2869)

    2009 arXiv

  194. [202]

    (Belle) 2013 Phys

    Chilikin K et al. (Belle) 2013 Phys. Rev. D88 074026 (Preprint 1306.4894)

    2013 arXiv

  195. [203]

    (LHCb) 2014 Phys

    Aaij R et al. (LHCb) 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 222002 (Preprint 1404.1903)

    2014 arXiv

  196. [204]

    (Belle) 2012 Phys

    Bondar A et al. (Belle) 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 122001 (Preprint 1110.2251)

    2012 arXiv

  197. [205]

    (Belle) 2015 Phys

    Garmash A et al. (Belle) 2015 Phys. Rev. D91 072003 (Preprint 1403.0992)

    2015 arXiv

  198. [206]

    (Belle) 2016 Phys

    Garmash A et al. (Belle) 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 212001 (Preprint 1512.07419)

    2016 arXiv

  199. [207]

    Bondar A E, Garmash A, Milstein A I, Mizuk R and Voloshin M B 2011 Phys. Rev. D84 054010 (Preprint 1105.4473)

    2011 arXiv

  200. [208]

    (Belle) 2016 Phys

    Abdesselam A et al. (Belle) 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 142001 (Preprint 1508.06562)

    2016 arXiv

  201. [209]

    (Belle) 2013 Phys

    Krokovny P et al. (Belle) 2013 Phys. Rev. D88 052016 (Preprint 1308.2646)

    2013 arXiv

  202. [210]

    Liu X, Liu Y R, Deng W Z and Zhu S L 2008 Phys. Rev. D77 034003 (Preprint 0711.0494)

    2008 arXiv

  203. [211]

    Liu X, Liu Y R, Deng W Z and Zhu S L 2008 Phys. Rev. D77 094015 (Preprint 0803.1295)

    2008 arXiv

  204. [212]

    Ding G J, Huang W, Liu J F and Yan M L 2009 Phys. Rev. D79 034026 (Preprint 0805.3822)

    2009 arXiv

  205. [213]

    Braaten E and Lu M 2009 Phys. Rev. D79 051503 (Preprint 0712.3885)

    2009 arXiv

  206. [214]

    Cleven M, Wang Q, Guo F K, Hanhart C, Meissner U G and Zhao Q 2013 Phys. Rev. D87 074006 (Preprint 1301.6461)

    2013 arXiv

  207. [215]

    Wilbring E, Hammer H W and Meißner U G 2013Phys. Lett. B726 326–329 (Preprint 1304.2882)

    arXiv

  208. [216]

    Zhao L, Ma L and Zhu S L 2014 Phys. Rev. D89 094026 (Preprint 1403.4043)

    2014 arXiv

  209. [217]

    Aceti F, Bayar M, Oset E, Martinez Torres A, Khemchandani K P, Dias J M, Navarra F S and Nielsen M 2014 Phys. Rev. D90 016003 (Preprint 1401.8216)

    2014 arXiv

  210. [218]

    He J 2014 Phys. Rev. D90 076008 (Preprint 1409.8506)

    2014 arXiv

  211. [219]

    Dias J M, Aceti F and Oset E 2015 Phys. Rev. D91 076001 (Preprint 1410.1785)

    2015 arXiv

  212. [220]

    Karliner M and Rosner J L 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 122001 (Preprint 1506.06386)

    2015 arXiv

  213. [221]

    He J 2015 Phys. Rev. D92 034004 (Preprint 1505.05379)

    2015 arXiv

  214. [222]

    Zhou Z Y and Xiao Z 2015 Phys. Rev. D92 094024 (Preprint 1505.05761)

    2015 arXiv

  215. [223]

    Albaladejo M, Guo F K, Hidalgo-Duque C and Nieves J 2016 Phys. Lett. B755 337–342 (Preprint Hadronic molecules with pion exchange and quark core 72 1512.03638)

    2016 arXiv

  216. [224]

    Voloshin M B 2016 Phys. Rev. D93 074011 (Preprint 1601.02540)

    2016 arXiv

  217. [225]

    Kang X W, Guo Z H and Oller J A 2016 Phys. Rev. D94 014012 (Preprint 1603.05546)

    2016 arXiv

  218. [226]

    Coito S 2016 Phys. Rev. D94 014016 (Preprint 1602.07821)

    2016 arXiv

  219. [227]

    Goerke F, Gutsche T, Ivanov M A, Korner J G, Lyubovitskij V E and Santorelli P 2016 Phys. Rev. D94 094017 (Preprint 1608.04656)

    2016 arXiv

  220. [228]

    Gong Q R, Guo Z H, Meng C, Tang G Y, Wang Y F and Zheng H Q 2016 Phys. Rev. D94 114019 (Preprint 1604.08836)

    2016 arXiv

  221. [229]

    He J and Chen D Y 2018 Eur. Phys. J. C78 94 (Preprint 1712.05653)

    2018 arXiv

  222. [230]

    Gong Q R, Pang J L, Wang Y F and Zheng H Q 2018 Eur. Phys. J. C78 276 ( Preprint 1612.08159)

    2018 arXiv

  223. [231]

    Wang Q, Baru V, Filin A A, Hanhart C, Nefediev A V and Wynen J L 2018 Phys. Rev. D98 074023 (Preprint 1805.07453)

    2018 arXiv

  224. [232]

    Voloshin M B 2018 Phys. Rev. D98 094028 (Preprint 1810.08146)

    2018 arXiv

  225. [233]

    Lee S H, Mihara A, Navarra F S and Nielsen M 2008 Phys. Lett. B661 28–32 ( Preprint 0710.1029)

    2008 arXiv

  226. [234]

    Bracco M E, Lee S H, Nielsen M and Rodrigues da Silva R 2009 Phys. Lett. B671 240–244 (Preprint 0807.3275)

    2009 arXiv

  227. [235]

    Zhang J R 2013 Phys. Rev. D87 116004 (Preprint 1304.5748)

    2013 arXiv

  228. [236]

    Wang Z G and Huang T 2014 Phys. Rev. D89 054019 (Preprint 1310.2422)

    2014 arXiv

  229. [237]

    Cui C Y, Liu Y L, Chen W B and Huang M Q 2014 J. Phys. G41 075003 (Preprint 1304.1850)

    2014 arXiv

  230. [238]

    Wang Z G and Huang T 2014 Nucl. Phys. A930 63–85 (Preprint 1312.2652)

    2014 arXiv

  231. [239]

    Chen W, Steele T G, Chen H X and Zhu S L 2015 Phys. Rev. D92 054002 (Preprint 1505.05619)

    2015 arXiv

  232. [240]

    Agaev S S, Azizi K and Sundu H 2016 Phys. Rev. D93 074002 (Preprint 1601.03847)

    2016 arXiv

  233. [241]

    Agaev S S, Azizi K and Sundu H 2017 Phys. Rev. D96 034026 (Preprint 1706.01216)

    2017 arXiv

  234. [242]

    Ozdem U and Azizi K 2017 Phys. Rev. D96 074030 (Preprint 1707.09612)

    2017 arXiv

  235. [243]

    Wang Z G and Zhang J X 2018 Eur. Phys. J. C78 14 (Preprint 1711.07215)

    2018 arXiv

  236. [244]

    Wang Z G 2018 Eur. Phys. J. C78 297 (Preprint 1712.05664)

    2018 arXiv

  237. [245]

    Ali A, Hambrock C and Wang W 2012 Phys. Rev. D85 054011 (Preprint 1110.1333)

    2012 arXiv

  238. [246]

    Maiani L, Riquer V, Faccini R, Piccinini F, Pilloni A and Polosa A D 2013 Phys. Rev. D87 111102 (Preprint 1303.6857)

    2013 arXiv

  239. [247]

    Braaten E 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 162003 (Preprint 1305.6905)

    2013 arXiv

  240. [248]

    Braaten E, Langmack C and Smith D H 2014 Phys. Rev. D90 014044 (Preprint 1402.0438)

    2014 arXiv

  241. [249]

    Deng C, Ping J and Wang F 2014 Phys. Rev. D90 054009 (Preprint 1402.0777)

    2014 arXiv

  242. [250]

    Zhao L, Deng W Z and Zhu S L 2014 Phys. Rev. D90 094031 (Preprint 1408.3924)

    2014 arXiv

  243. [251]

    Deng C, Ping J, Huang H and Wang F 2015 Phys. Rev. D92 034027 (Preprint 1507.06408)

    2015 arXiv

  244. [252]

    Deng C, Ping J, Huang H and Wang F 2018 Phys. Rev. D98 014026 (Preprint 1801.00164)

    2018 arXiv

  245. [253]

    Anwar M N, Ferretti J and Santopinto E 2018 Phys. Rev. D98 094015 (Preprint 1805.06276)

    2018 arXiv

  246. [254]

    Wu J, Liu X, Liu Y R and Zhu S L 2019 Phys. Rev. D99 014037 (Preprint 1810.06886)

    2019 arXiv

  247. [255]

    Cleven M, Guo F K, Hanhart C, Wang Q and Zhao Q 2015 Phys. Rev. D92 014005 (Preprint 1505.01771)

    2015 arXiv

  248. [256]

    Baru V, Epelbaum E, Filin A A, Hanhart C and Nefediev A V 2017 JHEP 06 158 ( Preprint 1704.07332)

    2017 arXiv

  249. [257]

    (CLQCD) 2009 Phys

    Meng G Z et al. (CLQCD) 2009 Phys. Rev. D80 034503 (Preprint 0905.0752)

    2009 arXiv

  250. [258]

    Prelovsek S and Leskovec L 2013 Phys. Lett. B727 172–176 (Preprint 1308.2097)

    2013 arXiv

  251. [259]

    2014 Phys

    Chen Y et al. 2014 Phys. Rev. D89 094506 (Preprint 1403.1318)

    2014 arXiv

  252. [260]

    Prelovsek S, Lang C B, Leskovec L and Mohler D 2015 Phys. Rev. D91 014504 ( Preprint 1405.7623)

    2015 arXiv

  253. [261]

    Albaladejo M, Fernandez-Soler P and Nieves J 2016Eur. Phys. J. C76 573 (Preprint 1606.03008)

    arXiv

  254. [262]

    Ikeda Y, Aoki S, Doi T, Gongyo S, Hatsuda T, Inoue T, Iritani T, Ishii N, Murano K and Sasaki K (HAL QCD) 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 242001 (Preprint 1602.03465) Hadronic molecules with pion exchange and quark core 73

    2016 arXiv

  255. [263]

    Ikeda Y (HAL QCD) 2018 J. Phys. G45 024002 (Preprint 1706.07300)

    2018 arXiv

  256. [264]

    Liu X H, Zhao Q and Close F E 2008 Phys. Rev. D77 094005 (Preprint 0802.2648)

    2008 arXiv

  257. [265]

    Liu X, Zhang B and Zhu S L 2008 Phys. Rev. D77 114021 (Preprint 0803.4270)

    2008 arXiv

  258. [266]

    Matsuki T, Morii T and Sudoh K 2008 Phys. Lett. B669 156–159 (Preprint 0805.2442)

    2008 arXiv

  259. [267]

    Branz T, Gutsche T and Lyubovitskij V E 2010 Phys. Rev. D82 054025 (Preprint 1005.3168)

    2010 arXiv

  260. [268]

    Li X and Voloshin M B 2012 Phys. Rev. D86 077502 (Preprint 1207.2425)

    2012 arXiv

  261. [269]

    Ohkoda S, Yamaguchi Y, Yasui S and Hosaka A 2012 Phys. Rev. D86 117502 ( Preprint 1210.3170)

    2012 arXiv

  262. [270]

    Dong Y, Faessler A, Gutsche T and Lyubovitskij V E 2013 J. Phys. G40 015002 ( Preprint 1203.1894)

    2013 arXiv

  263. [271]

    Li G, Shao F l, Zhao C W and Zhao Q 2013 Phys. Rev. D87 034020 (Preprint 1212.3784)

    2013 arXiv

  264. [272]

    Voloshin M B 2013 Phys. Rev. D87 074011 (Preprint 1301.5068)

    2013 arXiv

  265. [273]

    Wang Q, Hanhart C and Zhao Q 2013 Phys. Lett. B725 106–110 (Preprint 1305.1997)

    2013 arXiv

  266. [274]

    Liu X H and Li G 2013 Phys. Rev. D88 014013 (Preprint 1306.1384)

    2013 arXiv

  267. [275]

    Dong Y, Faessler A, Gutsche T and Lyubovitskij V E 2013 Phys. Rev. D88 014030 ( Preprint 1306.0824)

    2013 arXiv

  268. [276]

    Chen D Y, Liu X and Matsuki T 2013 Phys. Rev. D88 014034 (Preprint 1306.2080)

    2013 arXiv

  269. [277]

    Chen D Y, Liu X and Matsuki T 2013 Phys. Rev. D88 036008 (Preprint 1304.5845)

    2013 arXiv

  270. [278]

    Chen D Y, Liu X and Matsuki T 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 232001 (Preprint 1303.6842)

    2013 arXiv

  271. [279]

    Dong Y, Faessler A, Gutsche T and Lyubovitskij V E 2014 Phys. Rev. D89 034018 ( Preprint 1310.4373)

    2014 arXiv

  272. [280]

    Liu X H, Ma L, Sun L P, Liu X and Zhu S L 2014 Phys. Rev. D90 074020 (Preprint 1407.3684)

    2014 arXiv

  273. [281]

    Gutsche T, Kesenheimer M and Lyubovitskij V E 2014 Phys. Rev. D90 094013 ( Preprint 1410.0259)

    2014 arXiv

  274. [282]

    Wang X Y, Xie J J and Chen X R 2015 Phys. Rev. D91 014032

    2015

  275. [283]

    Swanson E S 2015 Phys. Rev. D91 034009 (Preprint 1409.3291)

    2015 arXiv

  276. [284]

    Guo F K, Hanhart C, Wang Q and Zhao Q 2015 Phys. Rev. D91 051504 (Preprint 1411.5584)

    2015 arXiv

  277. [285]

    Wang X Y, Chen X R and Guskov A 2015 Phys. Rev. D92 094017 (Preprint 1503.02125)

    2015 arXiv

  278. [286]

    Szczepaniak A P 2015 Phys. Lett. B747 410–416 (Preprint 1501.01691)

    2015 arXiv

  279. [287]

    Pakhlov P and Uglov T 2015 Phys. Lett. B748 183–186 (Preprint 1408.5295)

    2015 arXiv

  280. [288]

    Bediaga I, de Miranda J M, Rodrigues F and Nielsen M 2015 Phys. Lett. B748 187–190 (Preprint 1504.04313)

    2015 arXiv

  281. [289]

    Chen W, Steele T G, Chen H X and Zhu S L 2015 Eur. Phys. J. C75 358 (Preprint 1501.03863)

    2015 arXiv

  282. [290]

    Liu X H, Oka M and Zhao Q 2016 Phys. Lett. B753 297–302 (Preprint 1507.01674)

    2016 arXiv

  283. [291]

    Chen D Y and Dong Y B 2016 Phys. Rev. D93 014003 (Preprint 1510.00829)

    2016 arXiv

  284. [292]

    Huang Y, He J, Liu X, Zhang H F, Xie J J and Chen X R 2016 Phys. Rev. D93 034022 (Preprint 1512.00981)

    2016 arXiv

  285. [293]

    Chen Y H, Daub J T, Guo F K, Kubis B, Meißner U G and Zou B S 2016 Phys. Rev. D93 034030 (Preprint 1512.03583)

    2016 arXiv

  286. [294]

    Abreu L M and Lafayette Vasconcellos A 2016 Phys. Rev. D94 096009

    2016

  287. [295]

    Huo W S and Chen G Y 2016 Eur. Phys. J. C76 172 (Preprint 1501.02189)

    2016 arXiv

  288. [296]

    Goerke F, Gutsche T, Ivanov M A, K¨ orner J G and Lyubovitskij V E 2017 Phys. Rev. D96 054028 (Preprint 1707.00539)

    2017 arXiv

  289. [297]

    Voloshin M B 2017 Phys. Rev. D96 094024 (Preprint 1707.00565)

    2017 arXiv

  290. [298]

    Yang Z, Wang Q and Meißner U G 2017 Phys. Lett. B775 50–53 (Preprint 1706.00960)

    2017 arXiv

  291. [299]

    Agaev S S, Azizi K and Sundu H 2017 Eur. Phys. J. C77 836 (Preprint 1709.03148)

    2017 arXiv

  292. [300]

    Voloshin M B 2018 Phys. Rev. D98 034025 (Preprint 1806.05651)

    2018 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.