Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Mixture-of-Personas Language Models for Population Simulation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.05019 v1 pith:T7GTML3D submitted 2025-04-07 cs.LG cs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.CL
keywords llmsmodelmodelsacrossdatadiversityexemplarlanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) paved the way for their emerging applications in various domains, such as human behavior simulations, where LLMs could augment human-generated data in social science research and machine learning model training. However, pretrained LLMs often fail to capture the behavioral diversity of target populations due to the inherent variability across individuals and groups. To address this, we propose \textit{Mixture of Personas} (MoP), a \textit{probabilistic} prompting method that aligns the LLM responses with the target population. MoP is a contextual mixture model, where each component is an LM agent characterized by a persona and an exemplar representing subpopulation behaviors. The persona and exemplar are randomly chosen according to the learned mixing weights to elicit diverse LLM responses during simulation. MoP is flexible, requires no model finetuning, and is transferable across base models. Experiments for synthetic data generation show that MoP outperforms competing methods in alignment and diversity metrics.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Agentic Economic Modeling

    econ.EM 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Bias-corrected LLM choices, calibrated on 10% of human data, reproduce a national field experiment's treatment effect (-65 bps vs -60 bps) and reduce conjoint demand-estimation error.

Pith tools