Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 3 minor 2 cited by

Vector charmonium(-like) states in the energy range of 4.1-4.6 GeV

T0 review · 1 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-06-28 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Coupled-channel effects from open-charm thresholds account for the structures in vector charmonium states between 4.1 and 4.6 GeV.

desk verdict The paper shows a coupled-channel model without bare poles roughly reproduces the line shapes across several BESIII channels, but the truncation to three S-wave channels is a load-bearing assumption that needs checking. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.06180 v2 pith:TC6NYHC4 submitted 2026-06-04 hep-ph hep-exhep-lat

Xiang-Kun Dong , Vadim Baru , Leon von Detten , Feng-Kun Guo , Christoph Hanhart , Teng Ji , Ulf-G. Mei{ss}ner , Alexey Nefediev This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phhep-exhep-lat
keywords charmoniumcoupledchannelsheavyquarkspinsymmetryexoticstatesthresholdeffectsBESIIIvectorresonancesdynamicalpoles
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper presents a unified coupled-channel framework to address the tension between inclusive and exclusive measurements of vector charmonium-like states in the 4.1-4.6 GeV range. It incorporates S-wave open-charm channels constrained by heavy-quark spin symmetry along with optional bare poles and final-state interactions. Simultaneous fits to several BESIII cross sections demonstrate that a purely dynamical scheme without bare charmonia already captures the gross features of the data. This indicates that the line shapes arise from strong coupled-channel effects with dynamically generated poles. The framework also explores possible heavy-quark spin partners of exotic states.

What carries the argument

Unified coupled-channel framework for 1-- resonances incorporating S-wave open-charm channels D D1, D* D1, D* D2* constrained by heavy-quark spin symmetry, optional bare poles, and final-state interactions in Zc channels.

What would settle it

A measurement showing that the line shapes cannot be reproduced without significant contributions from other partial waves or channels would falsify the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The measured line shapes can be understood in terms of strong coupled-channel effects with dynamically generated poles, and even the purely dynamical scheme without bare charmonia captures the gross features of the analyzed distributions.

Load-bearing premise

The S-wave open-charm channels dominate the dynamics in this energy region and are sufficiently constrained by heavy-quark spin symmetry.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The purely dynamical scheme reproduces the main features of the cross sections and invariant mass distributions.
  • Inclusion of bare states for ψ(4160) and ψ(4415) improves fit quality but does not change the dynamical interpretation.
  • The model allows discussion of heavy-quark spin partners of the exotic 1-- states.
  • Threshold effects resolve the discrepancy between inclusive R-value and exclusive measurements.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the model is correct, similar coupled-channel dynamics may explain structures in other hidden-charm regions.
  • Experimental searches for the predicted spin partners would provide a direct test of the framework.
  • Extending the model to include more channels could refine predictions for line shapes in additional final states.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a unified coupled-channel framework for 1-- charmonium(-like) states in the 4.1-4.6 GeV region. It incorporates the S-wave open-charm channels D D1, D* D1, and D* D2* (constrained by heavy-quark spin symmetry), optional bare poles for ψ(4160) and ψ(4415), and final-state interactions in the Zc channels. Simultaneous fits are performed to BESIII cross sections for e+e- → J/ψπ+π-, hcπ+π-, D D*π, D* D*π, J/ψη, and χc0ω, plus invariant-mass distributions for Zc(3900) and Zc(4020). The central result is that even the purely dynamical scheme without bare charmonia reproduces the gross features of the data via dynamically generated poles, while adding bare states improves fit quality but does not alter the dynamical interpretation.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work offers a resolution to the inclusive-exclusive tension by attributing final-state-dependent structures to coupled-channel threshold effects rather than additional resonances. The simultaneous multi-channel fit strategy and explicit comparison of dynamical versus seeded models are strengths that allow direct assessment of the role of bare poles. The discussion of possible heavy-quark spin partners also adds value for future experimental searches.

major comments (1)
  1. [Model setup (Section on channel selection and HQSS constraints)] Model setup (Section on channel selection and HQSS constraints): The conclusion that dynamical poles from the three specified S-wave channels explain the line shapes rests on the assumption that these channels dominate and that omitted contributions (e.g., DD or D*D* in S- or P-wave, or additional thresholds) are negligible near 4.1-4.6 GeV. No quantitative test of the truncation's impact is described; if non-negligible, the generated poles could be artifacts of the restricted channel space rather than a robust dynamical explanation.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that the dynamical scheme 'captures the gross features' would be strengthened by a brief mention of the achieved χ²/dof or visual fit quality metrics for the benchmark models.
  2. Notation: ensure consistent use of overlines or bars for antiparticles across all channel labels and equations.
  3. Figure captions: clarify whether the plotted curves include only the dynamical contribution or also the optional bare-pole terms for each benchmark model.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback and positive assessment of the significance of our work. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The conclusion that dynamical poles from the three specified S-wave channels explain the line shapes rests on the assumption that these channels dominate and that omitted contributions (e.g., DD or D*D* in S- or P-wave, or additional thresholds) are negligible near 4.1-4.6 GeV. No quantitative test of the truncation's impact is described; if non-negligible, the generated poles could be artifacts of the restricted channel space rather than a robust dynamical explanation.

    Authors: The three S-wave channels (D D1, D* D1, D* D2*) are chosen as they represent the dominant couplings for 1-- states allowed by heavy-quark spin symmetry near the relevant thresholds (approximately 4.28-4.42 GeV). Channels such as DD or D*D* in S-wave lie at lower energies but do not couple directly in the same symmetry multiplets or are suppressed by angular momentum barriers in the vector sector; P-wave contributions are further suppressed near threshold. The simultaneous fit to six cross sections and two invariant-mass distributions with few parameters yields a good description, supporting that the truncation captures the essential dynamics. We acknowledge that an explicit test with additional channels would strengthen the claim and will add a dedicated paragraph in the revised manuscript discussing the channel selection rationale, expected suppression of omitted contributions, and the limitations of the current setup. revision: partial

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Central claim that dynamical scheme captures features reduces to success of fit to the same data

  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "We show that even the purely dynamical scheme without bare charmonia captures the gross features of the analyzed distributions. [...] the measured line shapes can be understood in terms of strong coupled-channel effects with dynamically generated poles."

    The framework parameters are fixed by simultaneous fits to the BESIII cross sections for e+e- to J/ψπ+π-, hcπ+π-, D D*π, D* D*π, J/ψη, χc0ω and the Zc invariant-mass distributions. The statements that the scheme 'captures the gross features' and that the line shapes 'can be understood in terms of' the coupled-channel poles are therefore descriptions of the fit outcome rather than independent results.

full rationale

The paper sets up a coupled-channel model with parameters constrained by HQSS, performs simultaneous fits to the listed cross sections and distributions, and then states that the purely dynamical version captures the gross features and that the line shapes are understood via coupled-channel effects with dynamically generated poles. This matches the fitted-input-called-prediction pattern: the 'capture' and 'understanding' statements are direct consequences of adjusting the model parameters to the analyzed data rather than an independent derivation or external benchmark. No parameter-free prediction or machine-checked result is invoked. The assumption about channel dominance is stated but not shown to be independently verified outside the fit. This produces partial circularity for the central claim while leaving room for the model to have physical motivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on heavy-quark spin symmetry to relate the open-charm channels, the assumption that only S-wave channels matter, and the choice of which bare poles to include; multiple fit parameters are adjusted to the data.

free parameters (2)
  • bare pole positions and couplings for psi(4160) and psi(4415)
    Optional parameters introduced when bare states are included; their values are adjusted during the simultaneous fits.
  • channel couplings and cutoff parameters
    Parameters controlling the strength of coupled-channel interactions and regularization, fitted to the cross sections.
assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Heavy-quark spin symmetry constrains the couplings among the D D1, D* D1, and D* D2* channels
    Invoked to reduce the number of independent parameters in the coupled-channel framework.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Vector charmonium(-like) states in the energy range of 4.1-4.6 GeV." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TC6NYHC4

@misc{pith2026260606180,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Vector charmonium(-like) states in the energy range of 4.1-4.6 GeV},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TC6NYHC4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.06180}
}
abstract

The spectrum of vector charmonium(-like) states in the 4.1\dash4.6~GeV energy region exhibits a long-standing tension between inclusive and exclusive measurements. While the inclusive $R$-value indicates only conventional vector charmonia such as $\psi(4160)$ and $\psi(4415)$, exclusive $e^+e^-$ cross sections reveal additional structures whose parameters strongly depend on the observed final states when fitted with Breit--Wigner functions. This puzzling pattern suggests that coupled-channel and threshold effects play an essential role. In this work, we develop a unified coupled-channel framework for the $1^{--}$ resonances in this energy region. The framework incorporates the $S$-wave open-charm channels $D\bar{D}_1$, $D^*\bar{D}_1$, and $D^*\bar{D}_2^*$ constrained by heavy-quark spin symmetry, optional bare poles associated with $\psi(4160)$ and $\psi(4415)$, and final-state interactions in the $Z_c$ channels. We perform simultaneous fits to the BESIII cross sections for $e^+e^-\to J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-$, $h_c\pi^+\pi^-$, $D\bar{D}^*\pi$, $D^*\bar{D}^*\pi$, $J/\psi\eta$, and $\chi_{c0}\omega$, together with invariant-mass distributions exhibiting the $Z_c(3900)$ and $Z_c(4020)$ structures. The benchmark models differ in the number of bare seed states and the fitting strategy. We show that even the purely dynamical scheme without bare charmonia captures the gross features of the analyzed distributions. The inclusion of bare compact states improves the fit quality but does not change the conclusion that the measured line shapes can be understood in terms of strong coupled-channel effects with dynamically generated poles. We also discuss possible heavy-quark spin partners of the exotic $1^{--}$ states.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quarkoniumlike states above open-flavor thresholds in Born-Oppenheimer EFT

    hep-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A QCD-constrained Born-Oppenheimer calculation organizes most observed quarkoniumlike states above open-flavor thresholds into heavy-quark-spin-symmetry multiplets and predicts a shallow X_b.

  2. Disentangling short- vs. long-distance dynamics in $B\to K^{*}\mu^+\mu^-$

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Dispersive resonance modeling of non-local effects in B o K*μ+μ- reduces the C9 anomaly to ≤2σ while yielding precise postdictions for S7,8,9.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

176 extracted references · 157 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Belle collaboration, Observation of a narrow charmonium-like state in exclusive B± → K ±π+π−J/ψ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) 262001 [hep-ex/0309032]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2003

  2. [2]

    Gell-Mann, A Schematic Model of Baryons and Mesons , Phys

    M. Gell-Mann, A Schematic Model of Baryons and Mesons , Phys. Lett. 8 (1964) 214

    1964

  3. [3]

    Zweig, An SU(3) model for strong interaction symmetry and its breaking

    G. Zweig, An SU(3) model for strong interaction symmetry and its breaking. Version 2 , in DEVELOPMENTS IN THE QUARK THEORY OF HADRONS. VOL. 1. 1964 - 1978 , D.B. Lichtenberg and S.P. Rosen, eds., pp. 22–101 (1964)

    1964

  4. [4]

    Godfrey and N

    S. Godfrey and N. Isgur, Mesons in a Relativized Quark Model with Chromodynamics , Phys. Rev. D 32 (1985) 189

    1985

  5. [5]

    Heavy-Quark QCD Exotica

    R.F. Lebed, R.E. Mitchell and E.S. Swanson, Heavy-Quark QCD Exotica , Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 93 (2017) 143 [1610.04528]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  6. [6]

    Multiquark Resonances

    A. Esposito, A. Pilloni and A.D. Polosa, Multiquark Resonances, Phys. Rept. 668 (2017) 1 [1611.07920]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  7. [7]

    Exotic Hadrons with Heavy Flavors -X, Y, Z and Related States-

    A. Hosaka, T. Iijima, K. Miyabayashi, Y. Sakai and S. Yasui, Exotic hadrons with heavy flavors: X, Y , Z, and related states , PTEP 2016 (2016) 062C01 [1603.09229]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    Exotics: Heavy Pentaquarks and Tetraquarks

    A. Ali, J.S. Lange and S. Stone, Exotics: Heavy Pentaquarks and Tetraquarks , Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 97 (2017) 123 [1706.00610]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

Show all 176 references
  1. [9]

    F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao and B.-S. Zou, Hadronic molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 (2018) 015004 [1705.00141]

    2018 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Olsen, T

    S.L. Olsen, T. Skwarnicki and D. Zieminska, Nonstandard heavy mesons and baryons: Experimental evidence, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 (2018) 015003 [1708.04012]

    2018 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Guo, X.-H

    F.-K. Guo, X.-H. Liu and S. Sakai, Threshold cusps and triangle singularities in hadronic reactions, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 112 (2020) 103757 [1912.07030]

    2020

  4. [12]

    Brambilla et al., The XY Z states: experimental and theoretical status and perspectives , Phys

    N. Brambilla et al., The XY Z states: experimental and theoretical status and perspectives , Phys. Rept. 873 (2020) 1 [1907.07583]

    2020

  5. [13]

    Dong, F.-K

    X.-K. Dong, F.-K. Guo and B.-S. Zou, A survey of heavy-antiheavy hadronic molecules , Progr. Phys. 41 (2021) 65 [2101.01021]

    2021

  6. [14]

    H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, Y.-R. Liu and S.-L. Zhu, An updated review of the new hadron states , Rept. Prog. Phys. 86 (2023) 026201 [2204.02649]

    2023

  7. [15]

    L. Meng, B. Wang, G.-J. Wang and S.-L. Zhu, Chiral perturbation theory for heavy hadrons and chiral effective field theory for heavy hadronic molecules , Phys. Rept. 1019 (2023) 1 [2204.08716]

    2023

  8. [16]

    Liu, Y.-W

    M.-Z. Liu, Y.-W. Pan, Z.-W. Liu, T.-W. Wu, J.-X. Lu and L.-S. Geng, Three ways to decipher the nature of exotic hadrons: multiplets, three-body hadronic molecules, and correlation functions, Phys. Rep. 1108 (2024) 2368 [2404.06399]

    2024

  9. [17]

    J.-H. Chen, J. Chen, F.-K. Guo, Y.-G. Ma, C.-P. Shen, Q.-Y. Shou et al., Production of exotic hadrons in pp and nuclear collisions , Nucl. Sci. Tech. 36 (2025) 55 [2411.18257]. – 36 –

    2025

  10. [18]

    Wang, Review of the QCD sum rules for exotic states , Front

    Z.-G. Wang, Review of the QCD sum rules for exotic states , Front. Phys. (Beijing) 21 (2026) 016300 [2502.11351]

    2026

  11. [19]

    X. Wang, X. Liu and Y. Gao, Colloquium: Hadron production in open-charm meson pairs at e+e- colliders , Rev. Mod. Phys. 98 (2026) 021001 [2502.15117]

    2026 arXiv

  12. [20]

    X. Dai, S. Jia, A. Nefediev, J. Nieves, C. Shen and L. Zhang, Exotic hadrons associated with b-quark, 2603.09315

    arXiv

  13. [21]

    Wang and Q

    Q. Wang and Q. Zhao, A Short Review of the Vector Charmonium-Like State ψ(4230), Chin. Phys. Lett. 42 (2025) 110201 [2508.05304]

    2025

  14. [22]

    Bai, D.-Y

    Z.-Y. Bai, D.-Y. Chen, Qi-Huang, X. Liu, S.-Q. Luo and J.-Z. Wang, Unquenched Charmonium and Beyond , 2602.19887

  15. [23]

    Uglov, Y.S

    T.V. Uglov, Y.S. Kalashnikova, A.V. Nefediev, G.V. Pakhlova and P.N. Pakhlov, Exclusive open-charm near-threshold cross sections in a coupled-channel approach , JETP Lett. 105 (2017) 1 [1611.07582]

    2017 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Hüsken, R.E

    N. Hüsken, R.E. Mitchell and E.S. Swanson, K-matrix analysis of e+e− annihilation in the bottomonium region, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 094013 [2204.11915]

    2022

  17. [25]

    Hüsken, R.F

    N. Hüsken, R.F. Lebed, R.E. Mitchell, E.S. Swanson, Y.-Q. Wang and C.-Z. Yuan, Poles and poltergeists in e+e− → D ¯D data, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 114010 [2404.03896]

    2024

  18. [26]

    Belle collaboration, Measurement of the near-threshold e+e− → D∗±D∗∓ cross section using initial-state radiation , Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 092001 [hep-ex/0608018]

    2007 arXiv

  19. [27]

    BaBar collaboration, Study of the Exclusive Initial-State Radiation Production of the D anti-D System , Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 111105 [hep-ex/0607083]

    2007 arXiv

  20. [28]

    CLEO collaboration, Measurement of Charm Production Cross Sections in e+e− Annihilation at Energies between 3.97 and 4.26 GeV , Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 072001 [0801.3418]

    2009 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Dong, L.-L

    X.-K. Dong, L.-L. Wang and C.-Z. Yuan, Derived Born cross sections of e+e− annihilation into open charm mesons from CLEO-c measurements , Chin. Phys. C 42 (2018) 043002 [1711.07311]

    2018

  22. [30]

    BaBar collaboration, Exclusive Initial-State-Radiation Production of the D ¯D, D∗ ¯D and D∗ ¯D∗ Systems, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 092001 [0903.1597]

    2009 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Belle collaboration, Measurement of e+e− → D(∗)+ s D(∗)− s cross sections near threshold using initial-state radiation , Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 011101 [1011.4397]

    2011 arXiv

  24. [32]

    BaBar collaboration, Exclusive Production of D+ s D− s , D∗+ s D− s , and D∗+ s D∗− s via e+e− Annihilation with Initial-State-Radiation , Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 052004 [1008.0338]

    2010 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Belle collaboration, Angular analysis of the e+e− → D(∗)±D∗∓ process near the open charm threshold using initial-state radiation , Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 012002 [1707.09167]

    2018 arXiv

  26. [34]

    BESIII collaboration, Cross section measurements of the e+e− → D∗+D∗− and e+e− → D∗+D− processes at center-of-mass energies from 4.085 to 4.600 GeV , JHEP 05 (2022) 155 [2112.06477]

    2022

  27. [35]

    BESIII collaboration, Precise Measurement of the e+e− → D∗+ s D∗− s Cross Sections at Center-of-Mass Energies from Threshold to 4.95 GeV , Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023) 151903 [2305.10789]. – 37 –

    2023

  28. [36]

    BESIII collaboration, Precise Measurement of the e+e− → D+ s D− s Cross Section at Center-of-Mass Energies from Threshold to 4.95 GeV , Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024) 261902 [2403.14998]

    2024

  29. [37]

    BESIII collaboration, Precise Measurement of Born Cross Sections for e+e− → D ¯D at s =3.80-4.95 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024) 081901 [2402.03829]

    2024

  30. [38]

    Xue, H.-J

    S.-R. Xue, H.-J. Jing, F.-K. Guo and Q. Zhao, Disentangling the role of the Y (4260) in e+e− → D∗ ¯D∗ and D∗ s ¯D∗ s via line shape studies , Phys. Lett. B 779 (2018) 402 [1708.06961]

    2018 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Nakamura, X.H

    S.X. Nakamura, X.H. Li, H.P. Peng, Z.T. Sun and X.R. Zhou, Global coupled-channel analysis of e+e− → c¯c processes in √s = 3.75 to 4.7 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 112 (2025) 054027 [2312.17658]

    2025

  32. [40]

    BESIII collaboration, Study of the e +e→ π+πω process at center-of-mass energies between 4.0 and 4.6 GeV , JHEP 08 (2023) 159 [2303.09718]

    2023

  33. [41]

    BaBar collaboration, Observation of a broad structure in the π+π−J/ψ mass spectrum around 4.26 GeV/ c2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 142001 [hep-ex/0506081]

    2005 arXiv

  34. [42]

    CLEO collaboration, Confirmation of the Y (4260) resonance production in ISR , Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 091104 [hep-ex/0611021]

    2006 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Belle collaboration, Measurement of e+e− → π+π−J/ψ cross-section via initial state radiation at Belle , Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 182004 [0707.2541]

    2007 arXiv

  36. [44]

    BESIII collaboration, Evidence of Two Resonant Structures in e+e− → π+π−hc, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 092002 [1610.07044]

    2017 arXiv

  37. [45]

    BESIII collaboration, Evidence of a resonant structure in the e+e− → π+D0D∗− cross section between 4.05 and 4.60 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 102002 [1808.02847]

    2019 arXiv

  38. [46]

    BESIII collaboration, Study of e+e− → γωJ/ψ and Observation of X(3872) → ωJ/ψ , Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 232002 [1903.04695]

    2019 arXiv

  39. [47]

    BESIII collaboration, Cross section measurements of e+e− → ωχc0 form √s = 4.178 to 4.278 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 091103 [1903.02359]

    2019 arXiv

  40. [48]

    BESIII collaboration, Measurement of cross sections for e+e− → µ+µ− at center-of-mass energies from 3.80 to 4.60 GeV , Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 112009 [2007.12872]

    2020

  41. [49]

    BESIII collaboration, Study of the process e+e− → π0π0J/ψ and neutral charmonium-like state Zc(3900)0, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 012009 [2004.13788]

    2020

  42. [50]

    BESIII collaboration, Cross section measurement of e+e− → π+π−(3686) from√s = 4.0076 to 4.6984 GeV , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 052012 [2107.09210]

    2021

  43. [51]

    BESIII collaboration, Observation of the Y (4230) and evidence for a new vector charmoniumlike state Y (4710) in e+e− → K 0 SK 0 SJ/ψ, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 092005 [2211.08561]

    2023

  44. [52]

    BESIII collaboration, Study of the resonance structures in the process e+e+ → π+π−J/ψ, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 072001 [2206.08554]

    2022

  45. [53]

    BESIII collaboration, Observation of the Y (4230) and a new structure in e+e− → K +K −J/ψ, Chin. Phys. C 46 (2022) 111002 [2204.07800]

    2022

  46. [54]

    BESIII collaboration, Measurement of e+e− → ηJ/ψ cross section from √s = 3.808 GeV to 4.951 GeV , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 092012 [2310.03361]. – 38 –

    2024

  47. [55]

    BESIII collaboration, Observation of Three Charmoniumlike States with J P C = 1 −− in e+e− → D∗0D∗−π+, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023) 121901 [2301.07321]

    2023

  48. [56]

    BESIII collaboration, Partial Wave Analysis of e+e− → π+π−J/ψ and Cross Section Measurement of e+e− → π±Zc(3900)∓ from 4.1271 to 4.3583 GeV , arXiv (2025) [2505.13222]

    2025

  49. [57]

    BESIII collaboration, Precise measurement of the e+e− → π+π−J/ψ cross section at center-of-mass energies from 3.77 to 4.60 GeV , Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 092001 [1611.01317]

    2017 arXiv

  50. [58]

    BESIII collaboration, Measurement of e+e− → π+π−D+D− cross sections at center-of-mass energies from 4.190 to 4.946 GeV , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 052012 [2208.00099]

    2022

  51. [59]

    BESIII collaboration, Measurement of e+e− → γχc0,c1,c2 cross sections at center-of-mass energies between 3.77 and 4.60 GeV , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 092001 [2107.03604]

    2021

  52. [60]

    Belle collaboration, Measurement of e+e− → π+π−ψ(2S) via Initial State Radiation at Belle, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 112007 [1410.7641]

    2015 arXiv

  53. [61]

    BaBar collaboration, Study of the reaction e+e− → ψ(2S)π−π− via initial-state radiation at BaBar , Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 111103 [1211.6271]

    2014 arXiv

  54. [62]

    BESIII collaboration, Cross section measurement of e+e− → π0π0ψ(3686) from √s = 4.008 GeV to 4.951 GeV , arXiv (2026) [ 2601.02136]

    2026

  55. [63]

    BESIII collaboration, Observation of Structures in the Processes e+e− → ωχc1 and ωχc2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024) 161901 [2401.14720]

    2024

  56. [64]

    BES collaboration, Determination of the ψ(3770), ψ(4040), ψ(4160) and ψ(4415) resonance parameters, eConf C070805 (2007) 02 [0705.4500]

    2007

  57. [65]

    Particle Data Group collaboration, Review of particle physics , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 030001

    2024

  58. [66]

    LHCb collaboration, Observation of a resonance in B+ → K +µ+µ− decays at low recoil , Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 112003 [1307.7595]

    2013 arXiv

  59. [67]

    BESIII collaboration, Observation of a Charged Charmoniumlike Structure in e+e− → π+π−J/ψ at √s = 4.26 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 252001 [1303.5949]

    2013 arXiv

  60. [68]

    BESIII collaboration, Observation of a Charged Charmoniumlike Structure Zc(4020) and Search for the Zc(3900) in e+e− → π+π−hc, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 242001 [1309.1896]

    2013 arXiv

  61. [69]

    BESIII collaboration, Confirmation of a charged charmoniumlike state Zc(3885)∓ in e+e− → π±(D ¯D∗)∓ with double D tag, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 092006 [1509.01398]

    2015 arXiv

  62. [70]

    BESIII collaboration, Observation of a charged charmoniumlike structure in e+e− → (D∗ ¯D∗)±π∓ at √s = 4.26 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 132001 [1308.2760]

    2014 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Osterheld et al., Measurements of Total Hadronic and Inclusive D∗ Cross-sections in e+e− Annihilations Between 3.87 GeV and 4.5 GeV ,

    A. Osterheld et al., Measurements of Total Hadronic and Inclusive D∗ Cross-sections in e+e− Annihilations Between 3.87 GeV and 4.5 GeV ,

  64. [72]

    BES collaboration, Measurements of the cross-section for e+e− → hadrons at center-of-mass energies from 2 GeV to 5 GeV , Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 101802 [hep-ex/0102003]. – 39 –

    2002 arXiv

  65. [73]

    von Detten, V

    L. von Detten, V. Baru, C. Hanhart, Q. Wang, D. Winney and Q. Zhao, How many vector charmoniumlike states lie in the mass range 4.2-4.35 GeV? , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 116002 [2402.03057]

    2024

  66. [74]

    Close and P.R

    F.E. Close and P.R. Page, Gluonic charmonium resonances at BaBar and BELLE? , Phys. Lett. B 628 (2005) 215 [hep-ph/0507199]

    2005 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Kou and O

    E. Kou and O. Pene, Suppressed decay into open charm for the Y (4260) being an hybrid , Phys. Lett. B 631 (2005) 164 [hep-ph/0507119]

    2005 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Zhu, The Possible interpretations of Y (4260), Phys

    S.-L. Zhu, The Possible interpretations of Y (4260), Phys. Lett. B 625 (2005) 212 [hep-ph/0507025]

    2005 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Llanes-Estrada, Y (4260) and possible charmonium assignment , Phys

    F.J. Llanes-Estrada, Y (4260) and possible charmonium assignment , Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 031503 [hep-ph/0507035]

    2005 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Qiao, One explanation for the exotic state Y(4260) , Phys

    C.-F. Qiao, One explanation for the exotic state Y(4260) , Phys. Lett. B 639 (2006) 263 [hep-ph/0510228]

    2006 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Dubynskiy and M.B

    S. Dubynskiy and M.B. Voloshin, Hadro-Charmonium, Phys. Lett. B 666 (2008) 344 [0803.2224]

    2008 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Ding, Are Y (4260) and Z + 2 (4250) D1D or D0D∗ Hadronic Molecules?, Phys

    G.-J. Ding, Are Y (4260) and Z + 2 (4250) D1D or D0D∗ Hadronic Molecules?, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 014001 [0809.4818]

    2009 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Kalashnikova and A.V

    Y.S. Kalashnikova and A.V. Nefediev, Spectra and decays of hybrid charmonia , Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 054025 [0801.2036]

    2008 arXiv

  74. [82]

    D.-Y. Chen, J. He and X. Liu, Nonresonant explanation for the Y(4260) structure observed in the e+e− → J/ψπ +π− process, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 054021 [1012.5362]

    2011 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Q. Wang, C. Hanhart and Q. Zhao, Decoding the riddle of Y (4260) and Zc(3900), Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 132003 [1303.6355]

    2013 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Cleven, Q

    M. Cleven, Q. Wang, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner and Q. Zhao, Y (4260) as the first S-wave open charm vector molecular state? , Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 074039 [1310.2190]

    2014 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Q. Wang, M. Cleven, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, X.-G. Wu et al., Y (4260): hadronic molecule versus hadro-charmonium interpretation , Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 034001 [1309.4303]

    2014 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Cleven, F.-K

    M. Cleven, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, Q. Wang and Q. Zhao, Employing spin symmetry to disentangle different models for the XY Z states, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 014005 [1505.01771]

    2015 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Qin, S.-R

    W. Qin, S.-R. Xue and Q. Zhao, Production of Y (4260) as a hadronic molecule state of ¯DD1 + c.c. in e+e− annihilations, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 054035 [1605.02407]

    2016 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Ji, X.-K

    T. Ji, X.-K. Dong, F.-K. Guo and B.-S. Zou, Prediction of a Narrow Exotic Hadronic State with Quantum Numbers J P C = 0 −−, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (2022) 102002 [2205.10994]

    2022

  81. [89]

    Peng, M.-J

    F.-Z. Peng, M.-J. Yan, M. Sánchez Sánchez and M. Pavon Valderrama, Light- and heavy-quark symmetries and the Y(4230), Y(4360), Y(4500), Y(4620), and X(4630) resonances, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 016001 [2205.13590]

    2023

  82. [90]

    Zhang, P.-P

    X.-Y. Zhang, P.-P. Shi and F.-K. Guo, Production of 1−+ exotic charmonium-like states in electron-positron collisions, Phys. Lett. B 867 (2025) 139603 [2503.06259]. – 40 –

    2025

  83. [91]

    Albaladejo, F.-K

    M. Albaladejo, F.-K. Guo, C. Hidalgo-Duque and J. Nieves, Zc(3900): What has been really seen?, Phys. Lett. B 755 (2016) 337 [1512.03638]

    2016 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Chen, M.-L

    Y.-H. Chen, M.-L. Du and F.-K. Guo, Precise determination of the pole position of the exotic Zc(3900), Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. (2023) [2310.15965]

    2023

  85. [93]

    M.-L. Du, M. Albaladejo, F.-K. Guo and J. Nieves, Combined analysis of the Zc(3900) and the Zcs(3985) exotic states , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 074018 [2201.08253]

    2022

  86. [94]

    Q. Ye, Y. Zhang, P.-Y. Niu and Q. Wang, Why is the Zc(3900) absent in the hcπ final state?, Phys. Rev. D 113 (2026) 114017 [2601.03697]

    2026

  87. [95]

    Yu, G.-J

    K. Yu, G.-J. Wang, J.-J. Wu and Z. Yang, Three-coupled-channel analysis of Zc(3900) involving D ¯D∗, πJ/ψ , and ρηc, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 114029 [2409.10865]

    2024

  88. [96]

    Yan, Z.-H

    L.-W. Yan, Z.-H. Guo, F.-K. Guo, D.-L. Yao and Z.-Y. Zhou, Reconciling experimental and lattice data of Zc(3900) in a J/ψπ − D ¯D∗ coupled-channel analysis, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 014026 [2307.12283]

    2024

  89. [97]

    Danilkin, D.A.S

    I. Danilkin, D.A.S. Molnar and M. Vanderhaeghen, Simultaneous description of the e+e− → J/ψ ππ (K ¯K) processes, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 016019 [2004.13499]

    2020

  90. [98]

    He and D.-Y

    J. He and D.-Y. Chen, Zc(3900)/Zc(3885) as a virtual state from πJ/ψ − ¯D∗D interaction, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 94 [1712.05653]

    2018 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Chen, M.-L

    Y.-H. Chen, M.-L. Du and F.-K. Guo, Determination of the Zc(3900) and the Zcs(3985) states from joint analysis of experimental and lattice data , 2604.25607

    arXiv

  92. [100]

    Chen and X

    D.-Y. Chen and X. Liu, Predicted charged charmonium-like structures in the hidden-charm dipion decay of higher charmonia , Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 034032 [1106.5290]

    2011 arXiv

  93. [101]

    E598 collaboration, Experimental Observation of a Heavy Particle J, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33 (1974) 1404

    1974

  94. [102]

    SLAC-SP-017 collaboration, Discovery of a Narrow Resonance in e+e− Annihilation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33 (1974) 1406

    1974

  95. [103]

    Abrams et al., The Discovery of a Second Narrow Resonance in e+e− Annihilation, Phys

    G.S. Abrams et al., The Discovery of a Second Narrow Resonance in e+e− Annihilation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33 (1974) 1453

    1974

  96. [104]

    Goldhaber et al., Observation in e+e− Annihilation of a Narrow State at 1865 MeV/ c2 Decaying to Kπ and Kπππ , Phys

    G. Goldhaber et al., Observation in e+e− Annihilation of a Narrow State at 1865 MeV/ c2 Decaying to Kπ and Kπππ , Phys. Rev. Lett. 37 (1976) 255

    1976

  97. [105]

    Rapidis et al., Observation of a Resonance in e+e− Annihilation Just Above Charm Threshold, Phys

    P.A. Rapidis et al., Observation of a Resonance in e+e− Annihilation Just Above Charm Threshold, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39 (1977) 526

    1977

  98. [106]

    DASP collaboration, Total Cross-section for Hadron Production by e+e− Annihilation at Center-of-mass Energies Between 3.6 GeV and 5.2 GeV , Phys. Lett. B 76 (1978) 361

    1978

  99. [107]

    Siegrist et al., Observation of a Resonance at 4.4 GeV and Additional Structure Near 4.1 GeV in e+e− Annihilation, Phys

    J. Siegrist et al., Observation of a Resonance at 4.4 GeV and Additional Structure Near 4.1 GeV in e+e− Annihilation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36 (1976) 700

    1976

  100. [108]

    Eichten, K

    E. Eichten, K. Gottfried, T. Kinoshita, K.D. Lane and T.-M. Yan, Charmonium: The Model, Phys. Rev. D 17 (1978) 3090

    1978

  101. [109]

    Eichten, K

    E. Eichten, K. Gottfried, T. Kinoshita, K.D. Lane and T.-M. Yan, Charmonium: Comparison with Experiment , Phys. Rev. D 21 (1980) 203

    1980

  102. [110]

    Ebert, R.N

    D. Ebert, R.N. Faustov and V.O. Galkin, Properties of heavy quarkonia and Bc mesons in the relativistic quark model , Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 014027 [hep-ph/0210381]. – 41 –

    2003 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Barnes, S

    T. Barnes, S. Godfrey and E.S. Swanson, Higher charmonia , Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 054026 [hep-ph/0505002]

    2005 arXiv

  104. [112]

    Li and K.-T

    B.-Q. Li and K.-T. Chao, Higher Charmonia and X, Y, Z states with Screened Potential , Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 094004 [0903.5506]

    2009 arXiv

  105. [113]

    Ferretti, G

    J. Ferretti, G. Galatà and E. Santopinto, Interpretation of the X(3872) as a charmonium state plus an extra component due to the coupling to the meson-meson continuum , Phys. Rev. C 88 (2013) 015207 [1302.6857]

    2013 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Rosner, Charmless final states and S-D wave mixing in the ψ′′, Phys

    J.L. Rosner, Charmless final states and S-D wave mixing in the ψ′′, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 094002 [hep-ph/0105327]

    2001 arXiv

  107. [115]

    BESIII collaboration, Observation of a Three-Resonance Structure in the Cross Section of e+e− → π+π−hc, arXiv (2025) [ 2504.04096]

    2025

  108. [116]

    BESIII collaboration, Study of e+e− → ωχcJ at center-of-mass energies from 4.21 to 4.42 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 092003 [1410.6538]

    2015 arXiv

  109. [117]

    BESIII collaboration, Observation of e+e− → ωχc1,2 near √s = 4.42 and 4.6 GeV , Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 011102 [1511.08564]

    2016 arXiv

  110. [118]

    Molnar, I

    D.A.S. Molnar, I. Danilkin and M. Vanderhaeghen, The role of charged exotic states in e+e− → ψ(2S) π+π−, Phys. Lett. B 797 (2019) 134851 [1903.08458]

    2019

  111. [119]

    Ermolina, I

    V. Ermolina, I. Danilkin and M. Vanderhaeghen, Simultaneous Dalitz-plot decomposition of the e+e− → J/ψππ (K ¯K) processes in the 4.13-4.36 GeV region using dispersive final-state interactions, 2606.07225

    arXiv

  112. [120]

    BESIII collaboration, Cross section measurement of e+e− → η′J/ψ from √s = 4.178 to 4.600 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 012008 [1911.00885]

    2020

  113. [121]

    BESIII collaboration, Measurement of the Born cross section for e+e− → ηhc at center-of-mass energies between 4.1 and 4.6 GeV , Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) L011101 [2404.06718]

    2025

  114. [122]

    Farrar, Q.-M

    G.R. Farrar, Q.-M. Li and C.-Z. Yuan, New approach to finding invisible states in e+e− annihilation and application to BESIII data , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) L051901 [2311.04654]

    2024

  115. [123]

    Hanhart, Y.S

    C. Hanhart, Y.S. Kalashnikova, P. Matuschek, R.V. Mizuk, A.V. Nefediev and Q. Wang, Practical Parametrization for Line Shapes of Near-Threshold States , Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 202001 [1507.00382]

    2015 arXiv

  116. [124]

    F.K. Guo, C. Hanhart, Y.S. Kalashnikova, P. Matuschek, R.V. Mizuk, A.V. Nefediev et al., Interplay of quark and meson degrees of freedom in near-threshold states: A practical parametrization for line shapes , Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 074031 [1602.00940]

    2016 arXiv

  117. [125]

    Ji, X.-K

    T. Ji, X.-K. Dong, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart and U.-G. Meißner, Precise determination of the properties of X(3872) and of its isovector partner Wc1, 2502.04458

  118. [126]

    Oller, E

    J.A. Oller, E. Oset and J.R. Pelaez, Meson meson interaction in a nonperturbative chiral approach, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 074001 [hep-ph/9804209]

    1999 arXiv

  119. [127]

    Garcia-Recio, L.S

    C. Garcia-Recio, L.S. Geng, J. Nieves and L.L. Salcedo, Low-lying even parity meson resonances and spin-flavor symmetry , Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 016007 [1005.0956]

    2011 arXiv

  120. [128]

    BESIII collaboration, Observation of Zc(3900)0 in e+e− → π0π0J/ψ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 112003 [1506.06018]. – 42 –

    2015 arXiv

  121. [129]

    Belle collaboration, Study of e+e− → π+π−J/ψ and Observation of a Charged Charmoniumlike State at Belle , Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 252002 [1304.0121]

    2013 arXiv

  122. [130]

    BESIII collaboration, Observation of a charged (D ¯D∗)± mass peak in e+e− → πD ¯D∗ at√s = 4.26 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 022001 [1310.1163]

    2014

  123. [131]

    BESIII collaboration, Observation of e+e− → π0π0hc and a Neutral Charmoniumlike Structure Zc(4020)0, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 212002 [1409.6577]

    2014 arXiv

  124. [132]

    BESIII collaboration, Observation of a neutral charmoniumlike state Zc(4025)0 in e+e− → (D∗ ¯D∗)0π0, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 182002 [1507.02404]

    2015 arXiv

  125. [133]

    BESIII collaboration, Study of e+e− → π+π−π0ηc and evidence for Zc(3900)± decaying into ρ±ηc, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 111102 [1906.00831]

    2019

  126. [134]

    Chen, J.T

    Y.-H. Chen, J.T. Daub, F.-K. Guo, B. Kubis, U.-G. Meißner and B.-S. Zou, Effect of Zb states on Υ(3S) → Υ(1S)ππ decays, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 034030 [1512.03583]

    2016 arXiv

  127. [135]

    Y.-H. Chen, M. Cleven, J.T. Daub, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, B. Kubis et al., Effects of Zb states and bottom meson loops on Υ(4S) → Υ(1S, 2S)π+π− transitions, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 034022 [1611.00913]

    2017 arXiv

  128. [136]

    V. Baru, E. Epelbaum, A.A. Filin, C. Hanhart, R.V. Mizuk, A.V. Nefediev et al., Insights into Zb(10610) and Zb(10650) from dipion transitions from Υ(10860), Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 034016 [2012.05034]

    2021

  129. [137]

    Li and M.B

    X. Li and M.B. Voloshin, Suppression of the S-wave production of (3/2)+ + (1/2)− heavy meson pairs in e+e− annihilation, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 034012 [1307.1072]

    2013 arXiv

  130. [138]

    Guo, P.-N

    F.-K. Guo, P.-N. Shen and H.-C. Chiang, Dynamically generated 1+ heavy mesons , Phys. Lett. B 647 (2007) 133 [hep-ph/0610008]

    2007 arXiv

  131. [139]

    Albaladejo, P

    M. Albaladejo, P. Fernandez-Soler, F.-K. Guo and J. Nieves, Two-pole structure of the D∗ 0(2400), Phys. Lett. B 767 (2017) 465 [1610.06727]

    2017 arXiv

  132. [140]

    Wu, D.-Y

    Q. Wu, D.-Y. Chen and F.-K. Guo, Production of the Z (′) b states from the Υ(5S, 6S) decays, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 034022 [1810.09696]

    2019 arXiv

  133. [141]

    Eden and J.R

    R.J. Eden and J.R. Taylor, Poles and Shadow Poles in the Many-Channel S Matrix, Phys. Rev. 133 (1964) B1575

    1964

  134. [142]

    Zhang and F.-K

    Z.-H. Zhang and F.-K. Guo, Classification of coupled-channel near-threshold structures , Phys. Lett. B 863 (2025) 139387 [2407.10620]

    2025

  135. [143]

    Oller and U.-G

    J.A. Oller and U.-G. Meißner, Chiral dynamics in the presence of bound states: Kaon nucleon interactions revisited , Phys. Lett. B 500 (2001) 263 [hep-ph/0011146]

    2001 arXiv

  136. [144]

    Jido, J.A

    D. Jido, J.A. Oller, E. Oset, A. Ramos and U.-G. Meißner, Chiral dynamics of the two Λ(1405) states, Nucl. Phys. A 725 (2003) 181 [nucl-th/0303062]

    2003 arXiv

  137. [145]

    Ikeda, T

    Y. Ikeda, T. Hyodo and W. Weise, Chiral SU(3) theory of antikaon-nucleon interactions with improved threshold constraints , Nucl. Phys. A 881 (2012) 98 [1201.6549]

    2012 arXiv

  138. [146]

    Mai, Review of the Λ(1405) A curious case of a strangeness resonance , Eur

    M. Mai, Review of the Λ(1405) A curious case of a strangeness resonance , Eur. Phys. J. ST 230 (2021) 1593 [2010.00056]

    2021

  139. [147]

    Lu, L.-S

    J.-X. Lu, L.-S. Geng, M. Doering and M. Mai, Cross-Channel Constraints on Resonant Antikaon-Nucleon Scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023) 071902 [2209.02471]. – 43 –

    2023

  140. [148]

    F.-K. Guo, Y. Kamiya, M. Mai and U.-G. Meißner, New insights into the nature of the Λ(1380) and Λ(1405) resonances away from the SU(3) limit , Phys. Lett. B 846 (2023) 138264 [2308.07658]

    2023

  141. [149]

    Baryon Scattering (BaSc) collaboration, Two-Pole Nature of the Λ(1405) resonance from Lattice QCD , Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024) 051901 [2307.10413]

    2024

  142. [150]

    He, X.-H

    Y.-B. He, X.-H. Liu, L.-S. Geng, F.-K. Guo and J.-J. Xie, Identifying the two-pole structure of the Λ(1405) using an SU(3) flavor filter , Phys. Rev. D 113 (2026) L051501 [2407.13486]

    2026

  143. [151]

    Kolomeitsev and M.F.M

    E.E. Kolomeitsev and M.F.M. Lutz, On Heavy light meson resonances and chiral symmetry , Phys. Lett. B 582 (2004) 39 [hep-ph/0307133]

    2004 arXiv

  144. [152]

    Guo, P.-N

    F.-K. Guo, P.-N. Shen, H.-C. Chiang, R.-G. Ping and B.-S. Zou, Dynamically generated 0+ heavy mesons in a heavy chiral unitary approach , Phys. Lett. B 641 (2006) 278 [hep-ph/0603072]

    2006 arXiv

  145. [153]

    L. Liu, K. Orginos, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart and U.-G. Meißner, Interactions of charmed mesons with light pseudoscalar mesons from lattice QCD and implications on the nature of the D∗ s0(2317), Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 014508 [1208.4535]

    2013 arXiv

  146. [154]

    Guo, U.-G

    Z.-H. Guo, U.-G. Meißner and D.-L. Yao, New insights into the D∗ s0(2317) and other charm scalar mesons , Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 094008 [1507.03123]

    2015 arXiv

  147. [155]

    Z.-H. Guo, L. Liu, U.-G. Meißner, J.A. Oller and A. Rusetsky, Towards a precise determination of the scattering amplitudes of the charmed and light-flavor pseudoscalar mesons, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 13 [1811.05585]

    2019 arXiv

  148. [156]

    Du, F.-K

    M.-L. Du, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, B. Kubis and U.-G. Meißner, Where is the lightest charmed scalar meson? , Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 192001 [2012.04599]

    2021

  149. [157]

    Zhuang, F.G

    Z. Zhuang, F.G. Domínguez and R. Molina, Revealing the D∗ 0(2300) two-pole structure from lattice data and the SU(3) limit , 2606.03826

    arXiv

  150. [158]

    Meißner, Two-pole structures in QCD: Facts, not fantasy! , Symmetry 12 (2020) 981 [2005.06909]

    U.-G. Meißner, Two-pole structures in QCD: Facts, not fantasy! , Symmetry 12 (2020) 981 [2005.06909]

    2020

  151. [159]

    Li, W.-L

    M.-T. Li, W.-L. Wang, Y.-B. Dong and Z.-Y. Zhang, A Study of P-wave Heavy Meson Interactions in A Chiral Quark Model , 1303.4140

    arXiv

  152. [160]

    Wang, Search for J P C = 1 −+ exotic state in e+e− annihilation, Phys

    Q. Wang, Search for J P C = 1 −+ exotic state in e+e− annihilation, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 114013 [1403.2243]

    2014 arXiv

  153. [161]

    Dong, Y.-H

    X.-K. Dong, Y.-H. Lin and B.-S. Zou, Prediction of an exotic state around 4240 MeV with J P C = 1 −+ as C-parity partner of Y (4260) in molecular picture , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 076003 [1910.14455]

    2020

  154. [162]

    Maiani, F

    L. Maiani, F. Piccinini, A.D. Polosa and V. Riquer, The Z(4430) and a New Paradigm for Spin Interactions in Tetraquarks , Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 114010 [1405.1551]

    2014 arXiv

  155. [163]

    BESIII collaboration, Search for 1−+ charmonium-like hybrid via e+e− → γη (′)ηc at center-of-mass energies between 4.258 and 4.681 GeV , 2504.13539

  156. [164]

    BESIII collaboration, Search for ψ0(4360) → ηψ(2S) through the process e+e− → ηηψ (2S), 2601.21190

  157. [165]

    BESIII collaboration, Observation and study of the decay J/ψ → ϕηη ′, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 112008 [1901.00085]. – 44 –

    2019 arXiv

  158. [166]

    X.-K. Dong, T. Ji, F.-K. Guo, U.-G. Meißner and B.-S. Zou, Hints of the J P C = 0 −− and 1−− K ¯K1(1270) molecules in the J/ψ → ϕηη ′ decay, Phys. Lett. B 853 (2024) 138646 [2402.02903]

    2024

  159. [167]

    Hammer, C

    I.K. Hammer, C. Hanhart and A.V. Nefediev, Remarks on meson loop effects on quark models, Eur. Phys. J. A 52 (2016) 330 [1607.06971]

    2016 arXiv

  160. [168]

    Hanhart and A

    C. Hanhart and A. Nefediev, Do near-threshold molecular states mix with neighboring Q ¯Q states?, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 114003 [2209.10165]

    2022

  161. [169]

    Isgur and M.B

    N. Isgur and M.B. Wise, WEAK TRANSITION FORM-F ACTORS BETWEEN HEA VY MESONS, Phys. Lett. B 237 (1990) 527

    1990

  162. [170]

    Isgur and M.B

    N. Isgur and M.B. Wise, Weak Decays of Heavy Mesons in the Static Quark Approximation , Phys. Lett. B 232 (1989) 113

    1989

  163. [171]

    Wise, Chiral perturbation theory for hadrons containing a heavy quark , Phys

    M.B. Wise, Chiral perturbation theory for hadrons containing a heavy quark , Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) 2188

    1992

  164. [172]

    Casalbuoni, A

    R. Casalbuoni, A. Deandrea, N. Di Bartolomeo, R. Gatto, F. Feruglio and G. Nardulli, Light vector resonances in the effective chiral Lagrangian for heavy mesons , Phys. Lett. B 292 (1992) 371 [hep-ph/9209248]

    1992 arXiv

  165. [173]

    Casalbuoni, A

    R. Casalbuoni, A. Deandrea, N. Di Bartolomeo, R. Gatto, F. Feruglio and G. Nardulli, Phenomenology of heavy meson chiral Lagrangians , Phys. Rept. 281 (1997) 145 [hep-ph/9605342]

    1997 arXiv

  166. [174]

    Falk, Hadrons of arbitrary spin in the heavy quark effective theory , Nucl

    A.F. Falk, Hadrons of arbitrary spin in the heavy quark effective theory , Nucl. Phys. B 378 (1992) 79

    1992

  167. [175]

    Falk and M.E

    A.F. Falk and M.E. Luke, Strong decays of excited heavy mesons in chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Lett. B 292 (1992) 119 [hep-ph/9206241]

    1992 arXiv

  168. [176]

    Guo, Triangle Singularities and Charmonium-like XY Z States, Nucl

    F.-K. Guo, Triangle Singularities and Charmonium-like XY Z States, Nucl. Phys. Rev. 37 (2020) 406 [2001.05884]. A HQSS-constrained interactions Hadrons containing one or more heavy quarks exhibit an emergent symmetry known as heavy quark spin symmetry (HQSS) often employed in ...

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed June 28, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.