REVIEW 3 cited by
tasksource: A Dataset Harmonization Framework for Streamlined NLP Multi-Task Learning and Evaluation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The HuggingFace Datasets Hub hosts thousands of datasets, offering exciting opportunities for language model training and evaluation. However, datasets for a specific task type often have different schemas, making harmonization challenging. Multi-task training or evaluation necessitates manual work to fit data into task templates. Several initiatives independently tackle this issue by releasing harmonized datasets or providing harmonization codes to preprocess datasets into a consistent format. We identify patterns across previous preprocessing efforts, such as column name mapping and extracting specific sub-fields from structured data in a column. We then propose a structured annotation framework that ensures our annotations are fully exposed and not hidden within unstructured code. We release a dataset annotation framework and dataset annotations for more than 500 English tasks\footnote{\url{https://github.com/sileod/tasksource}}. These annotations include metadata, such as the names of columns to be used as input or labels for all datasets, which can save time for future dataset preprocessing, regardless of whether our framework is utilized. We fine-tune a multi-task text encoder on all tasksource tasks, outperforming every publicly available text encoder of comparable size in an external evaluation.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Leak@$k$: Unlearning Does Not Make LLMs Forget Under Probabilistic Decoding
LLM unlearning methods that pass greedy-decoding benchmarks leak forgotten facts when the model is sampled repeatedly, and the new leak@k metric quantifies this.
-
R-TOFU: Unlearning in Large Reasoning Models
R-TOFU shows that answer-level unlearning is insufficient for large reasoning models because residual knowledge persists in chain-of-thought traces.
-
FActBench: A Benchmark for Fine-grained Automatic Evaluation of LLM-Generated Text in the Medical Domain
Unanimous voting between NLI and chain-of-thought fact-checking yields scores closest to medical expert judgments on three of four tasks in the new FActBench benchmark.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.