Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

GraphMuse: A Library for Symbolic Music Graph Processing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.12671 v1 pith:TDKHYPBS submitted 2024-07-17 cs.SD cs.AIcs.DLeess.AS

classification cs.SDcs.AIcs.DLeess.AS
keywords graphgraphmusemusicprocessingsymbolictaskslibrarymusical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have recently gained traction in symbolic music tasks, yet a lack of a unified framework impedes progress. Addressing this gap, we present GraphMuse, a graph processing framework and library that facilitates efficient music graph processing and GNN training for symbolic music tasks. Central to our contribution is a new neighbor sampling technique specifically targeted toward meaningful behavior in musical scores. Additionally, GraphMuse integrates hierarchical modeling elements that augment the expressivity and capabilities of graph networks for musical tasks. Experiments with two specific musical prediction tasks -- pitch spelling and cadence detection -- demonstrate significant performance improvement over previous methods. Our hope is that GraphMuse will lead to a boost in, and standardization of, symbolic music processing based on graph representations. The library is available at https://github.com/manoskary/graphmuse

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Drafting the Landscape of Computational Musicology Tools: a Survey-Based Approach

    cs.DL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 51-respondent survey of computational musicology practitioners identifies limited functionality, integration difficulties, and poor documentation as the main gaps in current tools.

Pith tools