Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

Higher-Dimensional Black Holes and Effective Field Theory

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Generic spinning black holes in higher dimensions have nonzero scalar tidal responses, with zeroes only in special limits.

desk verdict Solid analytic EFT contribution with new results for higher-dimensional black hole tidal responses; the ultra-spinning section is the one part that needs a careful look before the numbers are trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.21090 v1 pith:TF5FQP7I submitted 2024-12-30 hep-th

Daniel Glazer , Austin Joyce , Maria J. Rodriguez , Luca Santoni , Adam R. Solomon , Luis Fernando Temoche This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th MSC 83C5783E1581T12 PACS 04.70.-s04.50.-h
keywords scalartidalresponsesLovenumberspoint-particleeffectivefieldtheoryspinningblackholesMyers-Perryultra-spinninglimitlargeDhigher-dimensionalgravity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Tidal responses measure how much an object deforms when placed in an external field, and for black holes they are encoded in Love numbers. This paper studies the scalar versions of these responses for spinning black holes in $D$ spacetime dimensions and builds the effective-field-theory description of a distant black hole as a point particle with internal response coefficients. Its central claim is that for generic spin parameters these responses are nonzero for every angular momentum $L$ of the applied field, unlike four-dimensional black holes, whose static Love numbers vanish; zeroes survive only in special configurations such as equal spins in 5D Myers-Perry black holes or ultra-spinning black holes at integer values of $j/(D-5)$. The claim is supported by explicit matching of general-relativity wave-equation solutions to EFT response coefficients in five settings: Schwarzschild, Kerr, 5D Myers-Perry, large-D spinning black holes, and ultra-spinning $D\ge 6$ black holes. The paper also extracts frequency-dependent conservative responses, known as dynamical Love numbers, and leading dissipative responses, several for the first time.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the ratio of two large-distance fall-offs of a scalar wave around the black hole: the applied field growing as $r^L$ and the induced response decaying as $r^{-L-D+3}$ (or $r^{-2L-n-1}$ in the ultra-spinning case). The paper computes that ratio with a near-zone approximation, dropping small terms in the radial wave equation so that it becomes hypergeometric, whose solutions have known connection formulas; this is the step that makes analytic Love numbers possible when the exact equation would have more than three singular points. In the ultra-spinning case the near-zone solution is matched through a far-zone solution to reach the point-particle fall-offs. The machinery also includes Thorne tensors, traceless symmetric tensors that reproduce spherical harmonics when contracted with unit vectors, to organize the angular sectors, $\mathbb{CP}^N$ eigenfunctions for the equal-spin large-D case, and Schwinger-Keldysh doubling to describe dissipative worldline couplings.

What would settle it

Numerically integrate the exact scalar wave equation in an ultra-spinning Myers-Perry background for a fixed dimension such as $D=6$ or $D=7$ and a fixed large spin, extract the $c_2/c_1$ ratio of the two asymptotic solutions, and compare it with the paper's equations (7.36) and (7.39); an $O(\delta_a)$ discrepancy would falsify the near-zone/far-zone matching. A second check targets the zeroes: compute the static Love number at integer and half-integer values of $j/(D-5)$ and verify that only the predicted values vanish.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that the vanishing of static Love numbers is a four-dimensional, non-spinning accident rather than a generic black-hole property. For generic spin parameters in $D>4$, the static scalar tidal response of a black hole is nonzero and independent of the angular momentum $L$ of the applied field. The nonzero value persists in the 5D Myers-Perry solution, where both conservative and dissipative static responses appear unless the two spins are equal, in which case the response again vanishes for even $L$, matching the Kerr pattern. In ultra-spinning $D\ge 6$ black holes with a single spin, the response vanishes when $j/(D-5)$ is an integer, where $j$ labels angular momentum on the sphere factor, and the object effectively responds like a Schwarzschild black hole in two fewer dimensions. Each case is matched to point-particle EFT Wilson coefficients, with dynamical Love numbers at first order in frequency and dissipative coefficients obtained from Schwinger-Keldysh couplings.

Load-bearing premise

All of the ultra-spinning Love numbers rest on one stitching assumption: the near-zone solution, valid for $r \ll a$, is matched to a far-zone solution, valid for $r \gg r_s$, and the coefficient of the $r^{-L-n-1}$ fall-off extracted in that match is assumed to be correct at leading order in $\delta_a = r_h/a$; a missed leading-order term in that connection would change every ultra-spinning response.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is right, future studies of tidal effects should not assume universal vanishing of Love numbers: higher-dimensional spinning black holes are deformable objects under this scalar probe.
  • The equal-spin 5D Myers-Perry and 4D Kerr responses obey the same formulas, so symmetry enhancement, not dimension alone, controls when static responses disappear.
  • Ultra-spinning black holes respond as if they were Schwarzschild black holes in two fewer dimensions, with the sphere angular momentum $j$ playing the role of $L$.
  • Conservative and dissipative responses are both present at leading order, so a complete EFT of these objects must keep the doubled Schwinger-Keldysh sector, not just real worldline couplings.
  • Large-D spinning black holes provide an exactly solvable hypergeometric wave equation, making the large-D limit a controlled laboratory for testing EFT matching procedures.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not compute gravitational or electromagnetic responses, but it notes that known scalar, electromagnetic, and gravitational responses share qualitative features; if that pattern holds, the nonzero-Love-number result should extend beyond scalars.
  • The Kerr/equal-spin Myers-Perry coincidence points to an as-yet unidentified symmetry of the worldline EFT that forces only some Wilson coefficients to vanish; identifying it could predict vanishing responses without solving wave equations.
  • In the $r/a \to 0$ limit of ultra-spinning holes the horizon flattens into a membrane, so the natural matched description is a brane EFT rather than a point-particle EFT; the paper leaves this connection open.
  • Since the large-D wave equation is exact at hypergeometric level, an all-orders-in-frequency matching of the worldline two-point function may be possible, which would go beyond the paper's $O(\omega)$ matching.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper constructs a worldline effective field theory for spinning point particles in general spacetime dimension, including both conservative and dissipative finite-size couplings, and uses it to compute scalar one-point responses. These EFT responses are matched to solutions of the scalar wave equation around Schwarzschild, Kerr, five-dimensional Myers-Perry, equal-spin large-D Myers-Perry, and ultra-spinning single-spin Myers-Perry black holes. The main qualitative claim is that generic spinning higher-dimensional black holes have nonzero static scalar tidal responses for all multipoles L, with vanishing responses only in special limits: 5D equal-spin Myers-Perry at integer L/2 and ultra-spinning single-spin holes at integer j/(D-5). The paper also reports dynamical O(omega) conservative responses and leading and subleading dissipative responses, using a Schwinger-Keldysh formulation for the dissipative sector.

Significance. If correct, the paper provides an important counterpoint to the four-dimensional vanishing-Love-number phenomenon and supplies a systematic EFT framework for higher-dimensional spinning black holes. Its strengths include the explicit reproduction of known Schwarzschild and Kerr results, the independent validation of the Kerr near-zone approximation by a scattering calculation in Appendix E, and a parameter-free matching procedure in which Wilson coefficients are extracted from explicit general-relativity solutions rather than fitted to target responses. The main risk is concentrated in the ultra-spinning section, where the advertised zero pattern is obtained from a leading-order near-zone/far-zone matching without an error estimate.

major comments (2)
  1. [§7.1, Eqs. (7.15), (7.27), (7.34)-(7.40)] The ultra-spinning results (7.49)-(7.52) and the zero condition at integer j/(D-5) are derived entirely from the ratio c2/c1 in Eq. (7.36), which connects the near-zone solution valid for r << a to the far-zone solution valid for r >> r_s. The near-zone approximation (7.15) modifies the full radial equation at O(delta_a^2), and the far-zone equation (7.33) is obtained after dropping O(W^2) terms; no estimate is given for the accumulated error in the overlap region r_s << r << a. The remark after Eq. (7.29) that the near-zone response is of the same form as the large-D response checks only the near-zone structure, not the far-zone connection. Since an O(1) error in the leading coefficient of c2/c1 would change k(0)_Ljm and k(1)_Ljm in (7.49)-(7.50) and could remove the predicted zeroes, this step needs independent support. A concrete test would be to integrate the full radial equation (7.14)/(7.31) numerically for several small delta_a and W, compare the extracted k and nu with (7.49)-(7.52), and verify the zero of k(0) at integer j/(D-5).
  2. [§6.1, Eq. (6.12)] The large-D calculation replaces rho^{1/N} by 1 in Eq. (6.12), which is valid only for log(rho) << N, while the response is read off from the z -> infinity (r -> infinity) asymptotic in Eq. (6.21). At strict N = infinity this is a legitimate limiting procedure, but finite-N corrections to the Wilson coefficients in (6.42)-(6.45) are not estimated. Because the large-D limit is one of the paper's three new corners of parameter space, the authors should at least state the expected size of the first 1/N correction and whether the qualitative features, such as the nonzero Love number for U not equal to zero, survive at large but finite D.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§1 outline and §4.2.1] The outline says that the Kerr near-zone approximation is validated against a scattering calculation in Appendix F, but the actual validation is described in Appendix E; this cross-reference is inconsistent.
  2. [Abstract and §1] The phrase 'independent of the angular momentum of the applied field, L' should be read as 'nonvanishing for all L'; the wording could be misread as claiming that the value of the response is independent of L.
  3. [§7.1 and Conclusions] The metric in Section 7 uses D = n + 4, while the zero condition is quoted in the conclusions as j/(D-5); since D-5 = n-1 these statements are consistent, but the correspondence should be stated explicitly where (7.49) is first written.
  4. [§2.3.1, Eq. (2.47)] The notation lambda(lab)(Omega^2) is confusing because the argument Omega^2 is not the frequency variable omega that appears elsewhere in the Taylor expansion; the spin dependence of the Taylor coefficients should be written more explicitly.
  5. [§7.1, Eq. (7.7)] The two lines displayed for lambda_Ljm should be formatted as a single definition rather than appearing as an equation with two right-hand sides.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: black-hole responses come from solving the wave equation in explicit metrics, and EFT coefficients are matched afterwards rather than fitted to the target results.

full rationale

The paper's central results are extracted by solving the Klein-Gordon equation in explicit black hole spacetimes (e.g., eqs. (3.3), (4.5), (5.8), (6.10), and (7.5)) with boundary conditions corresponding to a tidal field at infinity and ingoing waves at the horizon. The EFT one-point function (2.60) is then matched to the resulting fall-off ratios to read off Wilson coefficients; the direction of matching is GR-to-EFT, not the reverse. No coefficient is fitted to a subset of the reported responses and then renamed as a prediction. The near-zone and far-zone approximations are stated approximations with stated orders of validity, and the paper explicitly cautions that the ultra-spinning expression (7.25) should only be trusted to O(δ_a). The uncontrolled near-zone/far-zone connection in Section 7.1 is a potential correctness risk, but an approximation error is not circularity. Self-citations to previous results for Schwarzschild, Kerr, and five-dimensional Myers-Perry black holes are used as benchmarks or consistency checks, not as premises that force the new higher-dimensional and ultra-spinning responses. No load-bearing step reduces to its own inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results are derived from general relativity, so no free parameters are fitted to the target responses. The main assumptions are the validity of near-zone approximations for the new regimes, the completeness of the point-particle EFT description, the representative nature of scalar probes, and the small-a-omega scaling in the ultra-spinning angular sector.

assumptions (4)
  • ad hoc to paper Near-zone approximation of the radial wave equation (keeping some O(omega^2) terms but dropping others) yields solutions reliable through first order in frequency.
    Invoked in Sections 3.1, 4.1, 5.1, and 7.1. Validated against scattering only for Kerr in Appendix E; assumed for the new Myers-Perry, large-D, and ultra-spinning results.
  • domain assumption The point-particle EFT with local worldline operators plus Schwinger-Keldysh dissipative couplings is a complete effective description of linear scalar responses at long distances.
    Standard EFT framework used in Section 2. Completeness is assumed, and the paper matches to GR rather than deriving the EFT from a microscopic theory.
  • domain assumption Scalar-field tidal responses are qualitatively representative of gravitational and electromagnetic responses of black holes.
    Stated in Section 1 as an expectation based on known cases. Used to justify the physical relevance of the scalar probe.
  • domain assumption In the ultra-spinning regime, the angular separation constant takes the small-a-omega form lambda_Ljm = L(L+n+1) - 2 m a omega + O((a omega)^2).
    Section 7.1 states this as the limit assumed when matching, with a comment that the alternative scaling a omega >> 1 would give a different separation constant.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Higher-Dimensional Black Holes and Effective Field Theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TF5FQP7I

@misc{pith2026241221090,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Higher-Dimensional Black Holes and Effective Field Theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TF5FQP7I}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.21090}
}
abstract

We study the scalar tidal responses of spinning higher-dimensional black holes, and their effective field theory description. After constructing the effective field theory of a spinning point particle in general dimension, we apply this theory to match the scalar responses of a variety of black hole solutions. In addition to the five-dimensional Myers--Perry black hole, we derive the scalar responses of spinning black holes in the large $D$ limit, and also study the responses of black holes in the ultra-spinning regime. We find that in the most generic case, the static responses of higher-dimensional spinning black holes do not vanish, but for special cases we find a pattern of zeroes in the responses, similar to other known examples. Further, we observe various interesting relations between the responses.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.21090 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Illustration of the closed-time contour used in the Schwinger–Keldysh formalism. The system is evolved from the infinite past (t = −∞) to the future (t = ∞, here denoted by a finite point), and back along a closed contour in the complex time plane. Fields inserted along the forward part of the contour are labeled with a 1 subscript, e.g., ϕ1, while fields inserted along the reverse contour are labelled with a 2 subs… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Dynamical Tidal Response of Schwarzschild Black Holes

    gr-qc 2025-11 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The dynamical Love numbers of a Schwarzschild black hole are nonzero at quadratic order in frequency, run logarithmically with a coefficient set by dissipation, and are now matched including their finite, scheme-depen...

  2. Stochastic inflation as an open quantum system

    hep-th 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Stochastic inflation emerges from an open-quantum-system derivation, with a Lindblad master equation that reduces to and corrects Starobinsky's Fokker-Planck equation.

  3. Love Numbers of Covariant Loop Quantum Black Holes

    gr-qc 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Tidal Love numbers of three covariant loop quantum black holes are shown to be generically nonzero, Planck-scale suppressed, and model-dependent in sign and logarithmic running.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

136 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    G. T. Horowitz, ed., Black holes in higher dimensions . Cambridge Univ. Pr., Cambridge, UK, 2012

    2012

  2. [2]

    A bound on chaos,

    J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, “A bound on chaos,” JHEP 08 (2016) 106, arXiv:1503.01409 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2016

  3. [3]

    The entropy of Hawking radiation,

    A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian, and A. Tajdini, “The entropy of Hawking radiation,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 93 no. 3, (2021) 035002, arXiv:2006.06872 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    Scattering of two spinning black holes in post-Minkowskian gravity, to all orders in spin, and effective-one-body mappings,

    J. Vines, “Scattering of two spinning black holes in post-Minkowskian gravity, to all orders in spin, and effective-one-body mappings,” Class. Quant. Grav. 35 no. 8, (2018) 084002, arXiv:1709.06016 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2018

  5. [5]

    Scattering of Spinning Black Holes from Exponentiated Soft Factors,

    A. Guevara, A. Ochirov, and J. Vines, “Scattering of Spinning Black Holes from Exponentiated Soft Factors,” JHEP 09 (2019) 056, arXiv:1812.06895 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    The simplest massive S-matrix: from minimal coupling to Black Holes,

    M.-Z. Chung, Y.-T. Huang, J.-W. Kim, and S. Lee, “The simplest massive S-matrix: from minimal coupling to Black Holes,” JHEP 04 (2019) 156, arXiv:1812.08752 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2019

  7. [7]

    Kerr black holes as elementary particles,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, Y.-t. Huang, and D. O’Connell, “Kerr black holes as elementary particles,” JHEP 01 (2020) 046, arXiv:1906.10100 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2020

  8. [8]

    Time Evolution of a Rotating Black Hole Immersed in a Static Scalar Field,

    W. H. Press, “Time Evolution of a Rotating Black Hole Immersed in a Static Scalar Field,” Astrophysical Journal 175 (July, 1972) 243

    1972

Show all 136 references
  1. [9]

    Gravitational perturbations of the Schwarzschild spacetime: A Practical covariant and gauge-invariant formalism,

    K. Martel and E. Poisson, “Gravitational perturbations of the Schwarzschild spacetime: A Practical covariant and gauge-invariant formalism,” Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 104003, arXiv:gr-qc/0502028

    2005 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Tidal coupling of a Schwarzschild black hole and circularly orbiting moon,

    H. Fang and G. Lovelace, “Tidal coupling of a Schwarzschild black hole and circularly orbiting moon,” Phys. Rev. D72 (2005) 124016, arXiv:gr-qc/0505156 [gr-qc]

    2005 arXiv

  3. [11]

    On the gravitational polarizability of black holes,

    T. Damour and O. M. Lecian, “On the gravitational polarizability of black holes,” Phys. Rev. D80 (2009) 044017, arXiv:0906.3003 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Relativistic tidal properties of neutron stars,

    T. Damour and A. Nagar, “Relativistic tidal properties of neutron stars,” Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 084035, arXiv:0906.0096 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Relativistic theory of tidal Love numbers,

    T. Binnington and E. Poisson, “Relativistic theory of tidal Love numbers,” Phys. Rev. D80 (2009) 084018, arXiv:0906.1366 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Black hole stereotyping: Induced gravito-static polarization,

    B. Kol and M. Smolkin, “Black hole stereotyping: Induced gravito-static polarization,” JHEP 02 (2012) 010, arXiv:1110.3764 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Gravitomagnetic response of an irrotational body to an applied tidal field,

    P. Landry and E. Poisson, “Gravitomagnetic response of an irrotational body to an applied tidal field,” Phys. Rev. D 91 no. 10, (2015) 104026, arXiv:1504.06606 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Tidal deformation of a slowly rotating material body. External metric,

    P. Landry and E. Poisson, “Tidal deformation of a slowly rotating material body. External metric,” Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 104018, arXiv:1503.07366 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  9. [17]

    No-hair theorem for Black Holes in Astrophysical Environments,

    N. G¨ urlebeck, “No-hair theorem for Black Holes in Astrophysical Environments,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 no. 15, (2015) 151102, arXiv:1503.03240 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  10. [18]

    The effective field theorist’s approach to gravitational dynamics,

    R. A. Porto, “The effective field theorist’s approach to gravitational dynamics,” Phys. Rept. 633 (2016) 1–104, arXiv:1601.04914 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Gravitomagnetic Love tensor of a slowly rotating body: post-Newtonian theory,

    E. Poisson, “Gravitomagnetic Love tensor of a slowly rotating body: post-Newtonian theory,” Phys. Rev. D 102 no. 6, (2020) 064059, arXiv:2007.01678 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Spinning Black Holes Fall in Love,

    A. Le Tiec and M. Casals, “Spinning Black Holes Fall in Love,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 no. 13, (2021) 131102, arXiv:2007.00214 [gr-qc]. 93

    2021 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Tidal Love Numbers of Kerr Black Holes,

    A. Le Tiec, M. Casals, and E. Franzin, “Tidal Love Numbers of Kerr Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. D 103 no. 8, (2021) 084021, arXiv:2010.15795 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Tidal deformation and dissipation of rotating black holes,

    H. S. Chia, “Tidal deformation and dissipation of rotating black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 104 no. 2, (2021) 024013, arXiv:2010.07300 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Non-conservative effects on spinning black holes from world-line effective field theory,

    W. D. Goldberger, J. Li, and I. Z. Rothstein, “Non-conservative effects on spinning black holes from world-line effective field theory,” JHEP 06 (2021) 053, arXiv:2012.14869 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Static response and Love numbers of Schwarzschild black holes,

    L. Hui, A. Joyce, R. Penco, L. Santoni, and A. R. Solomon, “Static response and Love numbers of Schwarzschild black holes,” JCAP 04 (2021) 052, arXiv:2010.00593 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  17. [25]

    On the Vanishing of Love Numbers for Kerr Black Holes,

    P. Charalambous, S. Dubovsky, and M. M. Ivanov, “On the Vanishing of Love Numbers for Kerr Black Holes,” JHEP 05 (2021) 038, arXiv:2102.08917 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Vanishing of Black Hole Tidal Love Numbers from Scattering Amplitudes,

    M. M. Ivanov and Z. Zhou, “Vanishing of Black Hole Tidal Love Numbers from Scattering Amplitudes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 no. 9, (2023) 091403, arXiv:2209.14324 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Love numbers and magnetic susceptibility of charged black holes,

    D. Pere˜ niguez and V. Cardoso, “Love numbers and magnetic susceptibility of charged black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 105 no. 4, (2022) 044026, arXiv:2112.08400 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Ladder symmetries and Love numbers of Reissner-Nordstr¨ om black holes,

    M. Rai and L. Santoni, “Ladder symmetries and Love numbers of Reissner-Nordstr¨ om black holes,” JHEP 07 (2024) 098, arXiv:2404.06544 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Time Evolution of a Rotating Black Hole Immersed in a Static Scalar Field,

    W. H. Press, “Time Evolution of a Rotating Black Hole Immersed in a Static Scalar Field,” Astrophysical Journal 175 (1972) 243

    1972

  22. [30]

    Relativistic theory of surficial Love numbers,

    P. Landry and E. Poisson, “Relativistic theory of surficial Love numbers,” Phys. Rev. D 89 no. 12, (2014) 124011, arXiv:1404.6798 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Hidden Symmetry of Vanishing Love Numbers,

    P. Charalambous, S. Dubovsky, and M. M. Ivanov, “Hidden Symmetry of Vanishing Love Numbers,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 no. 10, (2021) 101101, arXiv:2103.01234 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Ladder symmetries of black holes. Implications for love numbers and no-hair theorems,

    L. Hui, A. Joyce, R. Penco, L. Santoni, and A. R. Solomon, “Ladder symmetries of black holes. Implications for love numbers and no-hair theorems,” JCAP 01 no. 01, (2022) 032, arXiv:2105.01069 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Near-zone symmetries of Kerr black holes,

    L. Hui, A. Joyce, R. Penco, L. Santoni, and A. R. Solomon, “Near-zone symmetries of Kerr black holes,” JHEP 09 (2022) 049, arXiv:2203.08832 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Love symmetry,

    P. Charalambous, S. Dubovsky, and M. M. Ivanov, “Love symmetry,” JHEP 10 (2022) 175, arXiv:2209.02091 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Compact body in a tidal environment: New types of relativistic Love numbers, and a post-Newtonian operational definition for tidally induced multipole moments,

    E. Poisson, “Compact body in a tidal environment: New types of relativistic Love numbers, and a post-Newtonian operational definition for tidally induced multipole moments,” Phys. Rev. D 103 no. 6, (2021) 064023, arXiv:2012.10184 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Tidally induced multipole moments of a nonrotating black hole vanish to all post-Newtonian orders,

    E. Poisson, “Tidally induced multipole moments of a nonrotating black hole vanish to all post-Newtonian orders,” Phys. Rev. D 104 no. 10, (2021) 104062, arXiv:2108.07328 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Nonlinearities in the tidal Love numbers of black holes,

    V. De Luca, J. Khoury, and S. S. C. Wong, “Nonlinearities in the tidal Love numbers of black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 108 no. 2, (2023) 024048, arXiv:2305.14444 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Vanishing of nonlinear tidal Love numbers of Schwarzschild black holes,

    M. M. Riva, L. Santoni, N. Savi´ c, and F. Vernizzi, “Vanishing of nonlinear tidal Love numbers of Schwarzschild black holes,” Phys. Lett. B 854 (2024) 138710, arXiv:2312.05065 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Gravito-magnetic polarization of Schwarzschild black hole,

    T. Hadad, B. Kol, and M. Smolkin, “Gravito-magnetic polarization of Schwarzschild black hole,” JHEP 06 (2024) 169, arXiv:2402.16172 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Vanishing of Quadratic Love Numbers of Schwarzschild Black Holes,

    S. Iteanu, M. M. Riva, L. Santoni, N. Savi´ c, and F. Vernizzi, “Vanishing of Quadratic Love Numbers of Schwarzschild Black Holes,” arXiv:2410.03542 [gr-qc]. 94

    arXiv

  33. [41]

    Symmetries of Vanishing Nonlinear Love Numbers of Schwarzschild Black Holes,

    O. Combaluzier-Szteinsznaider, L. Hui, L. Santoni, A. R. Solomon, and S. S. C. Wong, “Symmetries of Vanishing Nonlinear Love Numbers of Schwarzschild Black Holes,” arXiv:2410.10952 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    Black Holes in a Gravitational Field: The Non-linear Static Love Number of Schwarzschild Black Holes Vanishes,

    A. Kehagias and A. Riotto, “Black Holes in a Gravitational Field: The Non-linear Static Love Number of Schwarzschild Black Holes Vanishes,” arXiv:2410.11014 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  35. [43]

    The Vanishing of the Non-linear Static Love Number of Kerr Black Holes and the Role of Symmetries,

    L. R. Gounis, A. Kehagias, and A. Riotto, “The Vanishing of the Non-linear Static Love Number of Kerr Black Holes and the Role of Symmetries,” arXiv:2412.08249 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  36. [44]

    Testing strong-field gravity with tidal Love numbers,

    V. Cardoso, E. Franzin, A. Maselli, P. Pani, and G. Raposo, “Testing strong-field gravity with tidal Love numbers,” Phys. Rev. D95 no. 8, (2017) 084014, arXiv:1701.01116 [gr-qc]. [Addendum: Phys. Rev.D95,no.8,089901(2017)]

    2017 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Black Holes in an Effective Field Theory Extension of General Relativity,

    V. Cardoso, M. Kimura, A. Maselli, and L. Senatore, “Black Holes in an Effective Field Theory Extension of General Relativity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 no. 25, (2018) 251105, arXiv:1808.08962 [gr-qc]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 131, 109903 (2023)]

    2018 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Implications of the weak gravity conjecture for tidal Love numbers of black holes,

    V. De Luca, J. Khoury, and S. S. C. Wong, “Implications of the weak gravity conjecture for tidal Love numbers of black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 108 no. 4, (2023) 044066, arXiv:2211.14325 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Instability of ultra-spinning black holes,

    R. Emparan and R. C. Myers, “Instability of ultra-spinning black holes,” JHEP 09 (2003) 025, arXiv:hep-th/0308056

    2003 arXiv

  40. [48]

    The Phase Structure of Higher-Dimensional Black Rings and Black Holes,

    R. Emparan, T. Harmark, V. Niarchos, N. A. Obers, and M. J. Rodriguez, “The Phase Structure of Higher-Dimensional Black Rings and Black Holes,” JHEP 10 (2007) 110, arXiv:0708.2181 [hep-th]

    2007 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Asymptotics of d-dimensional Kaluza-Klein black holes: Beyond the Newtonian approximation,

    Y.-Z. Chu, W. D. Goldberger, and I. Z. Rothstein, “Asymptotics of d-dimensional Kaluza-Klein black holes: Beyond the Newtonian approximation,” JHEP 03 (2006) 013, arXiv:hep-th/0602016

    2006 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Classical Effective Field Theory and Caged Black Holes,

    B. Kol and M. Smolkin, “Classical Effective Field Theory and Caged Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 064033, arXiv:0712.2822 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Scalar Love numbers and Love symmetries of 5-dimensional Myers-Perry black holes,

    P. Charalambous and M. M. Ivanov, “Scalar Love numbers and Love symmetries of 5-dimensional Myers-Perry black holes,” JHEP 07 (2023) 222, arXiv:2303.16036 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Love numbers for rotating black holes in higher dimensions,

    M. J. Rodriguez, L. Santoni, A. R. Solomon, and L. F. Temoche, “Love numbers for rotating black holes in higher dimensions,” Phys. Rev. D 108 no. 8, (2023) 084011, arXiv:2304.03743 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Love numbers and Love symmetries for p-form and gravitational perturbations of higher-dimensional spherically symmetric black holes,

    P. Charalambous, “Love numbers and Love symmetries for p-form and gravitational perturbations of higher-dimensional spherically symmetric black holes,” JHEP 04 (2024) 122, arXiv:2402.07574 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Love symmetry in higher-dimensional rotating black hole spacetimes,

    F. Gray, C. Keeler, D. Kubiznak, and V. Martin, “Love symmetry in higher-dimensional rotating black hole spacetimes,” arXiv:2409.05964 [gr-qc]

  47. [55]

    An Effective field theory of gravity for extended objects,

    W. D. Goldberger and I. Z. Rothstein, “An Effective field theory of gravity for extended objects,” Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 104029, arXiv:hep-th/0409156

    2006 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Dissipative effects in the worldline approach to black hole dynamics,

    W. D. Goldberger and I. Z. Rothstein, “Dissipative effects in the worldline approach to black hole dynamics,” Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 104030, arXiv:hep-th/0511133

    2006 arXiv

  49. [57]

    The Relativistic Spherical Top,

    A. J. Hanson and T. Regge, “The Relativistic Spherical Top,” Annals Phys. 87 (1974) 498

    1974

  50. [58]

    Lagrangian Dynamics of Spinning Particles and Polarized Media in General Relativity,

    I. Bailey and W. Israel, “Lagrangian Dynamics of Spinning Particles and Polarized Media in General Relativity,” Commun. Math. Phys. 42 (1975) 65–82

    1975

  51. [59]

    Post-Newtonian corrections to the motion of spinning bodies in NRGR,

    R. A. Porto, “Post-Newtonian corrections to the motion of spinning bodies in NRGR,” Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 104031, arXiv:gr-qc/0511061

    2006 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Canonical formulation of spin in general relativity,

    J. Steinhoff, “Canonical formulation of spin in general relativity,” Annalen Phys. 523 (2011) 296–353, arXiv:1106.4203 [gr-qc]. 95

    2011 arXiv

  53. [61]

    (Re-)Inventing the Relativistic Wheel: Gravity, Cosets, and Spinning Objects,

    L. V. Delacr´ etaz, S. Endlich, A. Monin, R. Penco, and F. Riva, “(Re-)Inventing the Relativistic Wheel: Gravity, Cosets, and Spinning Objects,” JHEP 11 (2014) 008, arXiv:1405.7384 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Effective Field Theories of Post-Newtonian Gravity: A comprehensive review,

    M. Levi, “Effective Field Theories of Post-Newtonian Gravity: A comprehensive review,” Rept. Prog. Phys. 83 no. 7, (2020) 075901, arXiv:1807.01699 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  55. [63]

    The Hyperfine Einstein-Infeld-Hoffmann potential,

    R. A. Porto and I. Z. Rothstein, “The Hyperfine Einstein-Infeld-Hoffmann potential,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 021101, arXiv:gr-qc/0604099

    2006 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Spin supplementary condition in quantum field theory: covariant SSC and physical state projection,

    J.-W. Kim and J. Steinhoff, “Spin supplementary condition in quantum field theory: covariant SSC and physical state projection,” JHEP 07 (2023) 042, arXiv:2302.01944 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Perturbations of a rotating black hole. 1. Fundamental equations for gravitational electromagnetic and neutrino field perturbations,

    S. A. Teukolsky, “Perturbations of a rotating black hole. 1. Fundamental equations for gravitational electromagnetic and neutrino field perturbations,” Astrophys. J. 185 (1973) 635–647

    1973

  58. [66]

    Klein–Gordon Equation And Rotating Black Holes,

    S. L. Detweiler, “Klein–Gordon Equation And Rotating Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 2323–2326

    1980

  59. [67]

    Revisiting the matching of black hole tidal responses: A systematic study of relativistic and logarithmic corrections,

    M. M. Ivanov and Z. Zhou, “Revisiting the matching of black hole tidal responses: A systematic study of relativistic and logarithmic corrections,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 8, (2023) 084030, arXiv:2208.08459 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Progress in effective field theory approach to the binary inspiral problem,

    I. Z. Rothstein, “Progress in effective field theory approach to the binary inspiral problem,” Gen. Rel. Grav. 46 (2014) 1726

    2014

  61. [69]

    The Tune of Love and the Nature(ness) of Spacetime,

    R. A. Porto, “The Tune of Love and the Nature(ness) of Spacetime,” Fortsch. Phys. 64 no. 10, (2016) 723–729, arXiv:1606.08895 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Tidal effects in quantum field theory,

    K. Haddad and A. Helset, “Tidal effects in quantum field theory,” JHEP 12 (2020) 024, arXiv:2008.04920 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Tidal effects for spinning particles,

    R. Aoude, K. Haddad, and A. Helset, “Tidal effects for spinning particles,” JHEP 03 (2021) 097, arXiv:2012.05256 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Leading Nonlinear Tidal Effects and Scattering Amplitudes,

    Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez, R. Roiban, E. Sawyer, and C.-H. Shen, “Leading Nonlinear Tidal Effects and Scattering Amplitudes,” JHEP 05 (2021) 188, arXiv:2010.08559 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Dissipation in the effective field theory for hydrodynamics: First order effects,

    S. Endlich, A. Nicolis, R. A. Porto, and J. Wang, “Dissipation in the effective field theory for hydrodynamics: First order effects,” Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 105001, arXiv:1211.6461 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  66. [74]

    The Schwinger-Keldysh coset construction,

    C. O. Akyuz, G. Goon, and R. Penco, “The Schwinger-Keldysh coset construction,” JHEP 06 (2024) 004, arXiv:2306.17232 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  67. [75]

    The Fluid Manifesto: Emergent symmetries, hydrodynamics, and black holes,

    F. M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam, and M. Rangamani, “The Fluid Manifesto: Emergent symmetries, hydrodynamics, and black holes,” JHEP 01 (2016) 184, arXiv:1510.02494 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Effective field theory of dissipative fluids,

    M. Crossley, P. Glorioso, and H. Liu, “Effective field theory of dissipative fluids,” JHEP 09 (2017) 095, arXiv:1511.03646 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Lectures on non-equilibrium effective field theories and fluctuating hydrodynamics,

    H. Liu and P. Glorioso, “Lectures on non-equilibrium effective field theories and fluctuating hydrodynamics,” PoS T ASI2017(2018) 008, arXiv:1805.09331 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  70. [78]

    The Theory of a general quantum system interacting with a linear dissipative system,

    R. P. Feynman and F. L. Vernon, Jr., “The Theory of a general quantum system interacting with a linear dissipative system,” Annals Phys. 24 (1963) 118–173

    1963

  71. [79]

    Path integral approach to quantum Brownian motion,

    A. O. Caldeira and A. J. Leggett, “Path integral approach to quantum Brownian motion,” Physica A 121 (1983) 587–616

    1983

  72. [80]

    Nonequilibrium Quantum Fields: Closed Time Path Effective Action, Wigner Function and Boltzmann Equation,

    E. Calzetta and B. L. Hu, “Nonequilibrium Quantum Fields: Closed Time Path Effective Action, Wigner Function and Boltzmann Equation,” Phys. Rev. D 37 (1988) 2878. 96

    1988

  73. [81]

    Keldysh technique and nonlinear sigma-model: Basic principles and applications,

    A. Kamenev and A. Levchenko, “Keldysh technique and nonlinear sigma-model: Basic principles and applications,” Adv. Phys. 58 (2009) 197, arXiv:0901.3586 [cond-mat.other]

    2009 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Trautman, Lectures on General Relativity

    A. Trautman, Lectures on General Relativity. No. v. 1 in Lectures in theoretical physics. Plenum Publishing Corporation, 1965. https://books.google.com/books?id=4OgzAQAAIAAJ

    1965

  75. [83]

    Multipole Expansions of Gravitational Radiation,

    K. S. Thorne, “Multipole Expansions of Gravitational Radiation,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 52 (1980) 299–339

    1980

  76. [84]

    Dynamical tidal response of Kerr black holes from scattering amplitudes,

    M. V. S. Saketh, Z. Zhou, and M. M. Ivanov, “Dynamical tidal response of Kerr black holes from scattering amplitudes,” Phys. Rev. D 109 no. 6, (2024) 064058, arXiv:2307.10391 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Black Hole Quasinormal Modes and Seiberg–Witten Theory,

    G. Aminov, A. Grassi, and Y. Hatsuda, “Black Hole Quasinormal Modes and Seiberg–Witten Theory,” Annales Henri Poincare 23 no. 6, (2022) 1951–1977, arXiv:2006.06111 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Exact solution of Kerr black hole perturbations via CFT2 and instanton counting: Greybody factor, quasinormal modes, and Love numbers,

    G. Bonelli, C. Iossa, D. P. Lichtig, and A. Tanzini, “Exact solution of Kerr black hole perturbations via CFT2 and instanton counting: Greybody factor, quasinormal modes, and Love numbers,” Phys. Rev. D 105 no. 4, (2022) 044047, arXiv:2105.04483 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  79. [87]

    CFT description of BH’s and ECO’s: QNMs, superradiance, echoes and tidal responses,

    D. Consoli, F. Fucito, J. F. Morales, and R. Poghossian, “CFT description of BH’s and ECO’s: QNMs, superradiance, echoes and tidal responses,” JHEP 12 (2022) 115, arXiv:2206.09437 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Black hole perturbation theory meets CFT2: Kerr-Compton amplitudes from Nekrasov-Shatashvili functions,

    Y. F. Bautista, G. Bonelli, C. Iossa, A. Tanzini, and Z. Zhou, “Black hole perturbation theory meets CFT2: Kerr-Compton amplitudes from Nekrasov-Shatashvili functions,” Phys. Rev. D 109 no. 8, (2024) 084071, arXiv:2312.05965 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of spin-weighted spheroidal harmonics in four and higher dimensions,

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and M. Casals, “Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of spin-weighted spheroidal harmonics in four and higher dimensions,” Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 024013, arXiv:gr-qc/0511111. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 73, 109902 (2006)]

    2006 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Hidden Conformal Symmetry of the Kerr Black Hole,

    A. Castro, A. Maloney, and A. Strominger, “Hidden Conformal Symmetry of the Kerr Black Hole,” Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 024008, arXiv:1004.0996 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Generalized Hidden Kerr/CFT,

    D. A. Lowe and A. Skanata, “Generalized Hidden Kerr/CFT,” J. Phys. A 45 (2012) 475401, arXiv:1112.1431 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Dynamical Love Numbers for Kerr Black Holes,

    M. Perry and M. J. Rodriguez, “Dynamical Love Numbers for Kerr Black Holes,” arXiv:2310.03660 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  85. [93]

    Gravitational Raman Scattering in Effective Field Theory: A Scalar Tidal Matching at O(G3),

    M. M. Ivanov, Y.-Z. Li, J. Parra-Martinez, and Z. Zhou, “Gravitational Raman Scattering in Effective Field Theory: A Scalar Tidal Matching at O(G3),” Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 no. 13, (2024) 131401, arXiv:2401.08752 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Black Holes in Higher Dimensional Space-Times,

    R. C. Myers and M. J. Perry, “Black Holes in Higher Dimensional Space-Times,” Annals Phys. 172 (1986) 304

    1986

  87. [95]

    The large D limit of General Relativity,

    R. Emparan, R. Suzuki, and K. Tanabe, “The large D limit of General Relativity,” JHEP 06 (2013) 009, arXiv:1302.6382 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Effective theory of Black Holes in the 1/D expansion,

    R. Emparan, T. Shiromizu, R. Suzuki, K. Tanabe, and T. Tanaka, “Effective theory of Black Holes in the 1/D expansion,” JHEP 06 (2015) 159, arXiv:1504.06489 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  89. [97]

    A membrane paradigm at large D,

    S. Bhattacharyya, A. De, S. Minwalla, R. Mohan, and A. Saha, “A membrane paradigm at large D,” JHEP 04 (2016) 076, arXiv:1504.06613 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Large D limit of Einstein’s equations,

    R. Emparan and C. P. Herzog, “Large D limit of Einstein’s equations,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 92 no. 4, (2020) 045005, arXiv:2003.11394 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  91. [99]

    The Inverse Dimensional Expansion in Quantum Gravity,

    A. Strominger, “The Inverse Dimensional Expansion in Quantum Gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 24 (1981) 3082. 97

    1981

  92. [100]

    Quantum gravity at a large number of dimensions,

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, “Quantum gravity at a large number of dimensions,” Nucl. Phys. B 684 (2004) 209–234, arXiv:hep-th/0310263

    2004 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Black holes, hidden symmetries, and complete integrability,

    V. P. Frolov, P. Krtous, and D. Kubiznak, “Black holes, hidden symmetries, and complete integrability,” Living Rev. Rel. 20 no. 1, (2017) 6, arXiv:1705.05482 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Greybody factors for rotating black holes in higher dimensions,

    R. Jorge, E. S. de Oliveira, and J. V. Rocha, “Greybody factors for rotating black holes in higher dimensions,” Class. Quant. Grav. 32 no. 6, (2015) 065008, arXiv:1410.4590 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Gravitational perturbations of higher dimensional rotating black holes: Tensor perturbations,

    H. K. Kunduri, J. Lucietti, and H. S. Reall, “Gravitational perturbations of higher dimensional rotating black holes: Tensor perturbations,” Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 084021, arXiv:hep-th/0606076

    2006 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Kaluza-Klein consistency, Killing vectors, and Kahler spaces,

    P. Hoxha, R. R. Martinez-Acosta, and C. N. Pope, “Kaluza-Klein consistency, Killing vectors, and Kahler spaces,” Class. Quant. Grav. 17 (2000) 4207–4240, arXiv:hep-th/0005172

    2000 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Black Holes in Higher Dimensions,

    R. Emparan and H. S. Reall, “Black Holes in Higher Dimensions,” Living Rev. Rel. 11 (2008) 6, arXiv:0801.3471 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Greybody factors for Myers-Perry black holes,

    P. Boonserm, A. Chatrabhuti, T. Ngampitipan, and M. Visser, “Greybody factors for Myers-Perry black holes,” J. Math. Phys. 55 (2014) 112502, arXiv:1405.5678 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Supergravity black holes, Love numbers, and harmonic coordinates,

    M. Cvetic, G. W. Gibbons, C. N. Pope, and B. F. Whiting, “Supergravity black holes, Love numbers, and harmonic coordinates,” Phys. Rev. D 105 no. 8, (2022) 084035, arXiv:2109.03254 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  100. [108]

    Kerr Effective Black Hole Geometries in Supergravity,

    M. Cvetiˇ c, N. H. Rodr ´ ıguez, M. J. Rodriguez, and O. Varela, “Kerr Effective Black Hole Geometries in Supergravity,” arXiv:2406.10458 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  101. [109]

    Effective Field Theory for Extreme Mass Ratio Binaries,

    C. Cheung, J. Parra-Martinez, I. Z. Rothstein, N. Shah, and J. Wilson-Gerow, “Effective Field Theory for Extreme Mass Ratio Binaries,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 no. 9, (2024) 091402, arXiv:2308.14832 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Gravitational self force from scattering amplitudes in curved space,

    D. Kosmopoulos and M. P. Solon, “Gravitational self force from scattering amplitudes in curved space,” JHEP 03 (2024) 125, arXiv:2308.15304 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  103. [111]

    The Instability of charged black strings and p-branes,

    R. Gregory and R. Laflamme, “The Instability of charged black strings and p-branes,” Nucl. Phys. B 428 (1994) 399–434, arXiv:hep-th/9404071

    1994 arXiv

  104. [112]

    Kamenev, Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems

    A. Kamenev, Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems . Cambridge University Press, 2011. https://books.google.com/books?id=CwlrUepnla4C

    2011

  105. [113]

    Records from the S-Matrix Marathon: Schwinger-Keldysh Formalism,

    F. M. Haehl and M. Rangamani, “Records from the S-Matrix Marathon: Schwinger-Keldysh Formalism,” 10, 2024. arXiv:2410.10602 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  106. [114]

    The second law of thermodynamics from symmetry and unitarity,

    P. Glorioso and H. Liu, “The second law of thermodynamics from symmetry and unitarity,” arXiv:1612.07705 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  107. [115]

    Quantum contributions to cosmological correlations,

    S. Weinberg, “Quantum contributions to cosmological correlations,” Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 043514, arXiv:hep-th/0506236

    2005 arXiv

  108. [116]

    Brownian motion of a quantum oscillator,

    J. S. Schwinger, “Brownian motion of a quantum oscillator,” J. Math. Phys. 2 (1961) 407–432

    1961

  109. [117]

    Kadanoff and G

    L. Kadanoff and G. Baym, Quantum Statistical Mechanics: Green ’s Function Methods in Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Problems . Frontiers in Physics. A Lecture Note and Reprint Series. W.A. Benjamin, 1962. https://books.google.com/books?id=Y5I-AAAAIAAJ

    1962

  110. [118]

    Diagram technique for nonequilibrium processes,

    L. V. Keldysh, “Diagram technique for nonequilibrium processes,” Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 47 (1964) 1515–1527

    1964

  111. [119]

    M. J. G. Veltman, Diagrammatica: The Path to Feynman rules , vol. 4. Cambridge University Press, 5, 2012. 98

    2012

  112. [120]

    Statistical mechanical theory of irreversible processes. 1. General theory and simple applications in magnetic and conduction problems,

    R. Kubo, “Statistical mechanical theory of irreversible processes. 1. General theory and simple applications in magnetic and conduction problems,” J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 12 (1957) 570–586

    1957

  113. [121]

    Theory of many particle systems. 1.,

    P. C. Martin and J. S. Schwinger, “Theory of many particle systems. 1.,” Phys. Rev. 115 (1959) 1342–1373

    1959

  114. [122]

    Influence phase of a dS observer. Part I. Scalar exchange,

    R. Loganayagam and O. Shetye, “Influence phase of a dS observer. Part I. Scalar exchange,” JHEP 01 (2024) 138, arXiv:2309.07290 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  115. [123]

    Gravitational Contribution to the Casimir Energy in Kaluza-Klein Theories,

    A. Chodos and E. Myers, “Gravitational Contribution to the Casimir Energy in Kaluza-Klein Theories,” Annals Phys. 156 (1984) 412

    1984

  116. [124]

    Bring the Heat: Tidal Heating Constraints for Black Holes and Exotic Compact Objects from the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Data,

    H. S. Chia, Z. Zhou, and M. M. Ivanov, “Bring the Heat: Tidal Heating Constraints for Black Holes and Exotic Compact Objects from the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Data,” arXiv:2404.14641 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  117. [125]

    Explicit vector spherical harmonics on the 3-sphere,

    J. Ben Achour, E. Huguet, J. Queva, and J. Renaud, “Explicit vector spherical harmonics on the 3-sphere,” J. Math. Phys. 57 no. 2, (2016) 023504, arXiv:1505.03426 [math-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  118. [126]

    A Modern Approach to Superradiance,

    S. Endlich and R. Penco, “A Modern Approach to Superradiance,” JHEP 05 (2017) 052, arXiv:1609.06723 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  119. [127]

    Amplitudes, Observables, and Classical Scattering,

    D. A. Kosower, B. Maybee, and D. O’Connell, “Amplitudes, Observables, and Classical Scattering,” JHEP 02 (2019) 137, arXiv:1811.10950 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  120. [128]

    What can be measured asymptotically?,

    S. Caron-Huot, M. Giroux, H. S. Hannesdottir, and S. Mizera, “What can be measured asymptotically?,” JHEP 01 (2024) 139, arXiv:2308.02125 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  121. [129]

    Classical Observables from Causal Response Functions,

    S. Biswas and J. Parra-Martinez, “Classical Observables from Causal Response Functions,” arXiv:2411.09016 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  122. [130]

    The relation between KMOC and worldline formalisms for classical gravity,

    P. H. Damgaard, E. R. Hansen, L. Plant´ e, and P. Vanhove, “The relation between KMOC and worldline formalisms for classical gravity,” JHEP 09 (2023) 059, arXiv:2306.11454 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  123. [131]

    Weinberg, The Quantum theory of fields

    S. Weinberg, The Quantum theory of fields. Vol. 1: Foundations . Cambridge University Press, 6, 2005

    2005

  124. [132]

    The fluctuation-dissipation theorem,

    R. Kubo, “The fluctuation-dissipation theorem,” Reports on Progress in Physics 29 no. 1, (Jan.,

  125. [133]

    Analytic solutions of the Teukolsky equation and their low frequency expansions,

    S. Mano, H. Suzuki, and E. Takasugi, “Analytic solutions of the Teukolsky equation and their low frequency expansions,” Prog. Theor. Phys. 95 (1996) 1079–1096, arXiv:gr-qc/9603020

    1996 arXiv

  126. [134]

    Analytic black hole perturbation approach to gravitational radiation,

    M. Sasaki and H. Tagoshi, “Analytic black hole perturbation approach to gravitational radiation,” Living Rev. Rel. 6 (2003) 6, arXiv:gr-qc/0306120

    2003 arXiv

  127. [135]

    Particle Emission Rates from a Black Hole: Massless Particles from an Uncharged, Nonrotating Hole,

    D. N. Page, “Particle Emission Rates from a Black Hole: Massless Particles from an Uncharged, Nonrotating Hole,” Phys. Rev. D 13 (1976) 198–206

    1976

  128. [136]

    Universal low-energy dynamics for rotating black holes,

    J. M. Maldacena and A. Strominger, “Universal low-energy dynamics for rotating black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 4975–4983, arXiv:hep-th/9702015. 99

    1997 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.