REVIEW 2 cited by
Science is Exploration: Computational Frontiers for Conceptual Metaphor Theory
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Metaphors are everywhere. They appear extensively across all domains of natural language, from the most sophisticated poetry to seemingly dry academic prose. A significant body of research in the cognitive science of language argues for the existence of conceptual metaphors, the systematic structuring of one domain of experience in the language of another. Conceptual metaphors are not simply rhetorical flourishes but are crucial evidence of the role of analogical reasoning in human cognition. In this paper, we ask whether Large Language Models (LLMs) can accurately identify and explain the presence of such conceptual metaphors in natural language data. Using a novel prompting technique based on metaphor annotation guidelines, we demonstrate that LLMs are a promising tool for large-scale computational research on conceptual metaphors. Further, we show that LLMs are able to apply procedural guidelines designed for human annotators, displaying a surprising depth of linguistic knowledge.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Meanings are like Onions: a Layered Approach to Metaphor Processing
Metaphor meaning is modeled as an onion with an outer context layer, a middle conceptual blending layer, and an inner pragmatic intention layer.
-
LinguistAgent Technical Report: A Reflective Multi-Model Platform for Automated Linguistic Annotation
An LLM self-correction loop inside a no-code platform modestly improves metaphor tagging F1 over single-pass annotation.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.