REVIEW 2 cited by
How Does SimSiam Avoid Collapse Without Negative Samples? A Unified Understanding with Self-supervised Contrastive Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
To avoid collapse in self-supervised learning (SSL), a contrastive loss is widely used but often requires a large number of negative samples. Without negative samples yet achieving competitive performance, a recent work has attracted significant attention for providing a minimalist simple Siamese (SimSiam) method to avoid collapse. However, the reason for how it avoids collapse without negative samples remains not fully clear and our investigation starts by revisiting the explanatory claims in the original SimSiam. After refuting their claims, we introduce vector decomposition for analyzing the collapse based on the gradient analysis of the $l_2$-normalized representation vector. This yields a unified perspective on how negative samples and SimSiam alleviate collapse. Such a unified perspective comes timely for understanding the recent progress in SSL.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
On the Importance of Embedding Norms in Self-Supervised Learning
Embedding norms in self-supervised learning are not normalized away: they gate gradient size and encode confidence, so controlling them speeds up training.
-
ACE: Anatomically Consistent Embeddings in Composition and Decomposition
A self-supervised pretraining method that aligns global and local patch embeddings via composition and decomposition improves transfer to medical imaging tasks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.