Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 101 references

Thermoplasmonics of Gold-Core Silica-Shell Colloidal Nanoparticles under Pulse Illumination

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A thin dense silica shell on a gold nanoparticle accelerates water heating under ultrashort laser pulses, even though the shell lowers light absorption.

desk verdict A solid computational study whose central mechanism claim hinges on an unverified high-temperature parameter; the porous-silica results are new, but the dense-shell enhancement needs a sensitivity analysis before it is taken as established. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.04835 v1 pith:TG57ZDG7 submitted 2025-06-05 physics.comp-ph cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Julien El Hajj , Gilles Ledoux , Samy Merabia This is my paper
classification physics.comp-phcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords goldnanoparticlessilicashellsthermoplasmonicstwo-temperaturemodelmoleculardynamicsinterfacialthermalconductanceelectron-phononcouplingphotoacousticenhancement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether coating a gold nanoparticle with silica helps or hinders the delivery of pulsed-laser heat to surrounding water. It claims that a thin (5 nm) dense silica shell makes the water-nanoparticle interface heat up faster than the bare gold particle does for 100 fs and 10 ps laser pulses, even though the shell reduces light absorption. The cause is a direct electron-phonon heat channel at the gold-silica interface, which rapidly equilibrates the metal and the shell, combined with a silica-water interface that conducts heat several times better than the gold-water interface. If correct, this gives a quantitative explanation for the enhanced photoacoustic response measured for thin silica coatings and a design rule for photothermal nanoparticles. The same model shows the advantage disappears for thicker shells and for nanosecond pulses at low fluence, where bare gold remains the better heater.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the extended two-temperature model with an explicit interfacial electron-phonon conductance, sigma_es(Te)=A+BTe, at the gold-silica boundary, with A=96.1 MW $m^{-2}$ $K^{-1}$ and B=0.18 MW $m^{-2}$ $K^{-2}$. This term is the only channel that lets the hot electron gas of the metal feed heat directly into silica phonons without first thermalizing the metal lattice; in the boundary condition it appears alongside the ordinary phonon channel sigma_ps at the core-shell interface, while the shell-water interface is controlled by sigma_sw approximately 817-847 MW $m^{-2}$ $K^{-1}$ for dense silica. Around this thermal model sit two supporting pieces: Mie scattering for coated spheres with a Drude-Lorentz dielectric function whose oscillator strengths, frequencies, and damping depend on electron temperature, which sets how much power each configuration absorbs, and molecular dynamics simulations that supply the silica and interfacial conductances. The mechanism completes when a thin shell equilibrates with the core fast enough for the high silica-water conductance to drain heat outward before the gold-water interface of the bare particle has transferred much energy.

What would settle it

Measure the electron-phonon interfacial conductance of a planar gold-amorphous-silica interface by transient thermoreflectance from 300 K to roughly 2000 K; the model requires sigma_es of about 276 MW $m^{-2}$ $K^{-1}$ at 1000 K, and a measured value below roughly 150 MW $m^{-2}$ $K^{-1}$ would eliminate the predicted 5 nm dense-shell advantage in the same two-temperature calculation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the thermal bottleneck of a laser-heated gold nanoparticle in water is not the silica shell but the interface between gold electrons and silica. For a 50 nm gold core with a 5 nm dense silica shell, the interfacial electron-phonon conductance, sigma_es(Te)=96.1 MW $m^{-2}$ $K^{-1}$ + 0.18 MW $m^{-2}$ $K^{-2}$ Te, lets the shell reach the core temperature quickly enough that the high silica-water conductance (about 847 MW $m^{-2}$ $K^{-1}$ for dense silica) begins draining heat into water before the bare particle's slower gold-water channel has moved much energy. The result is that the water interface reaches a given temperature rise sooner for femtosecond and picosecond pulses, with the dense-silica particle cooling its electron gas roughly twice as fast as bare gold under a 100 fs pulse. Removing the electron-silica channel erases the advantage, and increasing the shell thickness to 10 or 20 nm turns the shell back into a thermal resistance. For nanosecond pulses at low fluence, the shell's lower absorption dominates and bare gold wins.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes, rather than measures or computes, the strength of the direct heat channel between the gold's hot electrons and the silica shell, using values A=96.1 MW $m^{-2}$ $K^{-1}$ and B=0.18 MW $m^{-2}$ $K^{-2}$ from an earlier study; if that channel is materially weaker, the predicted faster water heating for thin dense shells would shrink or reverse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For 100 fs and 10 ps pulses, a 5 nm dense silica shell on a 50 nm gold core brings the water-nanoparticle interface to a given temperature rise faster than bare gold at the same fluence.
  • Thicker shells (10 and 20 nm) reverse that effect, delaying water heating and raising the peak gold temperature, so shell thickness sets a practical optimum near a few nanometers for short pulses.
  • The proposed mechanism reproduces the measured photoacoustic amplification for thin silica coatings and implies the amplification should weaken or vanish as the shell thickens.
  • Under 1 ns pulses at fluences below about 1 mJ/cm2, the advantage disappears and bare gold heats water more efficiently, so the benefit is pulse-duration and fluence dependent.
  • A dense-silica-coated particle cools its electron gas roughly twice as fast as bare gold under a 100 fs pulse (about 770 K/ps versus 330 K/ps), showing the shell acts as a heat drain rather than an insulating layer.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the direct electron-to-dielectric energy channel is generic, thin oxide or ceramic shells on other plasmonic metals, such as silver or aluminum, could accelerate heat dissipation rather than insulate the core, extending the design space beyond gold-silica.
  • Because the silica shell itself absorbs little light, the optimal shell thickness can be tuned largely independently of the plasmon resonance wavelength, a degree of freedom the paper does not fully exploit.
  • The paper's own call for an ab initio determination of sigma_es is the natural next step: a first-principles value of A and B would decide whether the predicted 5 nm advantage survives quantitative scrutiny.
  • The 1 ns low-fluence result is a practical warning that comparisons between coated and bare particles must report pulse duration and fluence, because the ranking of configurations reverses across excitation regimes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a hybrid two-temperature model (TTM) coupled to molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to study the thermal response of gold-core silica-shell nanoparticles in water under pulsed laser illumination. The optical absorption is computed with Mie theory for coated spheres, including electron-temperature corrections to the gold dielectric function and Bruggeman effective-medium estimates for porous shells. The thermal model incorporates interfacial conductances obtained from MD simulations and an electron-phonon interfacial conductance σ_es imported from the authors' earlier work. The central claim is that a 5 nm dense silica shell accelerates water-interface heating relative to bare gold for 100 fs and 10 ps pulses, attributed to enhanced electron-phonon coupling at the gold-silica interface combined with high silica-water thermal conductance, and this mechanism is invoked to interpret enhanced photoacoustic response in experiments. The paper also examines 1 ns pulses, thicker shells, and porous shells.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper provides a plausible, atomistically informed mechanism for the experimentally observed photoacoustic enhancement of thin silica-coated gold nanoparticles, and it offers design guidance for photothermal applications. The strengths of the manuscript include: MD-computed thermal conductivities and interfacial conductances with reported error bars; a publicly available Python implementation of the temperature-dependent Mie absorption code; systematic exploration of pulse duration, fluence, shell thickness, and porosity; and an explicit acknowledgement in the Conclusion that an ab initio study of the gold-silica electron-phonon coupling is needed. These strengths make the paper a useful contribution even if the quantitative mechanism attribution requires further verification.

major comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (8), Fig. 6, Sec. III C] The dense-shell advantage over bare gold is structurally dependent on the high-temperature term B·Te of the imported interfacial electron-phonon conductance σ_es(Te)=A+B·Te. At the electron temperatures reached in the 100 fs case (about 4000 K in Fig. 9), B·Te ≈ 720 MW m^-2 K^-1, which is comparable to the silica-water conductance tabulated in Table IV. The parameters A and B are taken from Ref. [27] and are neither measured nor derived here, and no sensitivity analysis on A or B is reported for the dense-shell case. If B is overestimated or saturates at high Te, the electron-to-silica channel could be too weak to make the 5 nm dense shell outpace bare gold. I request a sensitivity analysis varying A and B over physically plausible ranges, or at least a threshold analysis showing how large B must be for the reported crossover to survive.
  2. [Abstract and Sec. III C] The abstract states that nanoparticles with a thin dense silica shell exhibit significantly faster water heating compared to bare gold nanoparticles without restricting the claim to pulse duration. The body of the paper shows this behavior for 100 fs and 10 ps pulses, but explicitly notes that for 1 ns pulses at low fluence (below 1 mJ/cm^2) bare gold acts as a more efficient heat generator than its silica-coated counterparts (text near Fig. 9 and the Conclusion). The abstract and the introductory overview should be qualified to state that the accelerated water heating is specific to ultrashort pulses in the fs-ps range, otherwise the main result is overgeneralized.
  3. [Eq. (12)] The Bruggeman effective-medium expression appears to be mislabeled relative to the definitions given in the text. With p denoting porosity, n_a=n_SiO2, and n_b=n_H2O, the formula as written yields n_eff=n_b when p=0, i.e., the dense silica limit would give the refractive index of water rather than of silica. The porosity factor should multiply the water (or void) term and (1-p) the silica term. Please correct the equation or the labeling of n_a and n_b, and confirm that the code used for the porous-shell absorption spectra implements the intended convention, since this affects the optical absorption results for porous shells in Sec. III A.
  4. [Eqs. (1)-(4)] The TTM treats the gold core as thermally lumped, with uniform electron and phonon temperatures. For a 50 nm radius core under 100 fs and 10 ps pulses, this neglects intraparticle temperature gradients during the first few picoseconds, when electron diffusion and phonon transport in gold may be spatially nonuniform. Because the interfacial electron-phonon conductance σ_es is temperature dependent, a lumped treatment could bias the predicted interfacial flux. Please justify the lumped approximation with a timescale estimate (e.g., electron and phonon diffusion times across the core) or compare against a spatially resolved TTM for at least the 100 fs case.
  5. [Eq. (5) and Sec. III A] It is not clear whether the absorption cross-section C_abs in the source term P(t) is updated with the instantaneous electron temperature Te(t) during the TTM integration, or whether it is fixed at the room-temperature value. The manuscript emphasizes the importance of electron-temperature corrections to the gold dielectric function and shows strong Te dependence in Figs. 3 and 4, but the TTM equations do not state how C_abs is evaluated in the transient calculation. If C_abs is fixed at 300 K, please justify this approximation given the electron temperatures reached (about 4000 K in the 100 fs case); if it is updated, please describe the interpolation and update procedure.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Notation in Eqs. (1)-(2)] Equation (1) uses S_e for the electron subsystem surface area, but the notation defined in the text is R_c, S_c, and V_c for the core. Please clarify whether S_e equals S_c or is a distinct quantity.
  2. [Sec. II C, text near Eq. (13)] There is a missing space and period in the sentence 'mean free path of free electrons.which is around 40 nm'; please correct this typo.
  3. [Data Availability] The Data Availability section says the Python code is available at a GitHub URL but then states 'Access can be granted upon reasonable request'. Please resolve this inconsistency by stating clearly whether the repository is publicly accessible or available on request.
  4. [Reference [23]] The author name 'Salgeirino-Maceira' in Ref. [23] appears to be misspelled; the correct spelling is 'Salgueiriño-Maceira'.
  5. [Table IV heading] The heading 'Conductance/Conductivity' with units 'MW m^-2 K^-1 / W m^-1 K^-1' is ambiguous because two different quantities are listed in one column; please separate the interfacial conductance and thermal conductivity into distinct labeled columns.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the core-shell speedup is a computed output of the TTM/MD model; the imported sigma_es is an acknowledged, externally-supported modeling assumption rather than a hidden restatement of the result.

full rationale

The paper's headline result—faster water heating for a 5 nm dense silica shell under 100 fs and 10 ps pulses—is a computed output of the coupled TTM/MD model (Eqs. 1–7), not an input. The key parameter sigma_es(Te) = A + B·Te (Eq. 8) is imported from the same group's prior work (Refs 27, 36, 37), and the Conclusion explicitly states that an ab initio determination of this coupling is still needed. That is a genuine limitation and a robustness risk: the B·Te term at Te ~ 4000 K is comparable to the silica–water conductance, and no sensitivity study over A and B is reported for the dense-shell case, so the quantitative advantage over bare gold is conditional on this imported value. However, this is parameter provenance and modeling assumption, not circularity: the faster water heating is not defined as sigma_es, and it emerges non-trivially from solving the coupled PDE system. The comparison between the +sigma_es and −sigma_es cases is a standard sensitivity analysis, not a tautological restatement. External evidence—transient thermoreflectance measurements (Refs 28, 29) and Xie et al.'s photoacoustic data (Ref 9)—independently supports the existence of the direct electron–silica channel and the qualitative trend. The MD-computed conductances (Table IV) are independently obtained inputs. No equation in the paper is equivalent to another by construction, and no fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction. Hence the derivation chain is self-contained in the sense required for a circularity finding.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The study relies heavily on two inputs not derived in the paper: the electron-phonon interfacial conductance sigma_es (from the group's prior work) and the ad hoc zeta scaling for porous silica. The other axioms are standard modeling assumptions for this class of thermoplasmonics simulations. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • sigma_es electron-phonon interfacial conductance = A=96.1 MW m^-2 K^-1, B=0.18 MW m^-2 K^-2
    Input parameter taken from Ref [27] by the same group; central to the predicted faster water heating. Not measured or derived here.
  • zeta scaling factor for porous silica = 1, 0.75, 0.5
    Ad hoc multiplier on sigma_es for porous shells, chosen by hand to mimic pore-induced scattering; not derived from first principles.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Two-temperature model with uniform electron and phonon temperatures in the gold core
    Invoked in Eqs. (1)-(2); assumes instantaneous internal thermalization and ignores spatial temperature gradients inside the 50 nm-radius core, a standard but simplifying approximation.
  • domain assumption Fourier diffusive heat transport in silica shell and water with constant thermophysical properties
    Eqs. (3)-(4) and Table I; assumes continuum conduction holds at 5-20 nm shell thicknesses and that MD-derived conductivities are representative.
  • domain assumption Electron-phonon interfacial conductance sigma_es = A + B*Te with A=96.1 MW m^-2 K^-1, B=0.18 MW m^-2 K^-2
    Eq. (8) and Refs [27,36,37]; this linear form and these values are taken from prior work, including by the same group, and are not derived in this paper.
  • domain assumption Mie theory for coated spheres with a temperature-dependent Drude-Lorentz dielectric function for gold and surface-scattering correction
    Sec. II B and Eq. (9); assumes spherical geometry, bulk-like optical properties with empirical corrections, and that the Au core is a continuous medium.
  • domain assumption Bruggeman effective medium approximation describes optical properties of 50% porous silica
    Eq. (12); assumes a random two-phase composite and ignores pore-size or percolation effects on refractive index.
  • domain assumption MD force fields (Munetoh Tersoff for silica, Heinz LJ for Au, TIP4P/2005 for water) faithfully represent interfacial thermal transport
    Sec. II C; the ITC and conductivity values used in TTM are computed with these models, so the final predictions inherit their accuracy.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Thermoplasmonics of Gold-Core Silica-Shell Colloidal Nanoparticles under Pulse Illumination." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TG57ZDG7

@misc{pith2026250604835,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Thermoplasmonics of Gold-Core Silica-Shell Colloidal Nanoparticles under Pulse Illumination},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TG57ZDG7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.04835}
}
read the original abstract

Core-shell nanoparticles, particularly those having a gold core, have emerged as a highly promising class of materials due to their unique optical and thermal properties, which underpin a wide range of applications in photothermal therapy, imaging, and biosensing. In this study, we present a comprehensive study of the thermal dynamics of gold-core silica-shell nanoparticles immersed in water under pulse illumination. The plasmonic response of the core-shell nanoparticle is described by incorporating Mie theory with electronic temperature corrections to the refractive indices of gold, based on a Drude Lorentz formulation. The thermal response of the core-shell nanoparticles is modeled by coupling the two temperature model with molecular dynamics simulations, providing an atomistic description of nanoscale heat transfer. We investigate nanoparticles with both dense and porous silica shells (with 50% porosity) under laser pulse durations of 100 fs, 10 ps, and 1 ns, and over a range of fluences between 0.05 and 5mJ/cm2. We show that nanoparticles with a thin dense silica shell (5 nm) exhibit significantly faster water heating compared to bare gold nanoparticles. This behavior is attributed to enhanced electron-phonon coupling at the gold silica interface and to the relatively high thermal conductance between silica and water. These findings provide new insights into optimizing nanoparticle design for efficient photothermal applications and establish a robust framework for understanding energy transfer mechanisms in heterogeneous metal dielectric nanostructures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.04835 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Illustration of the different energy channels from a bare gold and gold core-dense or porous silica shell nanoparticle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Illustration of the melt quench procedure used to generate porous silica from crystalline [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Absorption efficiency for a bare gold nanoparticle in water (with electronic temperature corrections) as a function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Absorption efficiency as a function of wavelength of bare and coated gold nanoparticles with amorphous silica shells [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Temperature profile averaged from the NEMD sim [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Influence of silica shell thickness and electron-phonon coupling on the nanoparticle response under laser pulses of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Influence of silica shell thickness and electron-phonon coupling on the maximum gold core temperature under laser [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Evolution of the maximum interface water temperature at the nanoparticle water interface under laser pulses of 100 fs, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Time evolution of the electronic temperature, gold core temperature, silica shell temperature, and water temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Histograms of the cooling rates for the different nanoparticle configurations under investigation: bare gold (blue) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Temperature profiles of specific regions of the systems measured when the water temperature is maximum at the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_11.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

101 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages

  1. [27]

    M. Hu, X. Wang, G. V. Hartland, Salgeirino-Maceira, and L. M. Liz-Marzan, Heat dissipation in gold-silica core-shell nanoparticles, Chem. Phys. Lett.125, 372 (2003)

    work page 2003

  2. [1]

    In this case, simultaneously, electrons and phonons within the metallic core reach thermal equilibrium, pro- ducing a thermal flux at the metal–water interface medi- ated by the interfacial phonon–phonon conductanceσ pw. All these thermal processes are described by the follow- ing equations that are inspired by the TTM model [33]: Vece ∂Te(t) ∂t =−V eG(T ...

  3. [2]

    The final configuration is equili- brated to asses structural and thermodynamic stability before proceeding with further analyses

    This process ensures a consistent and physically ac- curate representation of water confined within the pores of the silica structure. The final configuration is equili- brated to asses structural and thermodynamic stability before proceeding with further analyses. The thermal conductivity of the water-filled porous silica structure is 0.57±0.03 W/(m·K), ...

    2005

  4. [3]

    2 for a 10 nm sandwiched amorphous sil- ica thin film (Fig

    A steady state heat flux is established when the same amount of energy enters the system at the hot bath and exits at the cold bath, ensuring energy conservation as shown in Fig. 2 for a 10 nm sandwiched amorphous sil- ica thin film (Fig. 2a) and porous silica filled with water (Fig. 2b). Each system has the same spatial dimensions: x = 5 nm, y = 5 nm, wh...

  5. [4]

    H. H. Richardson, Z. N. Hickman, A. O. Govorov, A. C. Thomas, W. Zhang, and M. E. Kordesch, Thermooptical properties of gold nanoparticles embedded in ice: Char- acterization of heat generation and melting, Nano Letters 6, 783 (2006)

    2006

  6. [6]

    L. M. Liz-Marz´ an, Tailoring surface plasmons through the morphology and assembly of metal nanoparticles, Langmuir22, 32 (2006)

    2006

  7. [7]

    E. C. Dreaden, A. M. Alkilany, X. Huang, C. J. Murphy, and M. A. El-Sayed, The golden age: gold nanoparti- cles for biomedicine, Chemical Society reviews41, 2740 (2012)

    2012

  8. [8]

    Y.-S. Chen, W. Frey, S. Aglyamov, and S. Emelianov, Environment-dependent generation of photoacoustic waves from plasmonic nanoparticles, Small8, 47 (2012)

    2012

Show all 101 references
  1. [9]

    Bravo, B

    M. Bravo, B. Fortuni, P. Mulvaney, J. Hofkens, H. Uji- i, S. Rocha, and J. Hutchison, Nanoparticle-mediated thermal cancer therapies: Strategies to improve clinical translatability, Journal of Controlled Release372, 751 (2024)

    2024

  2. [10]

    Qin and J

    Z. Qin and J. C. Bischof, Thermophysical and biological responses of gold nanoparticle laser heating, Chem. Soc. Rev.41, 1191 (2012)

    2012

  3. [11]

    Y.-S. Chen, W. Frey, S. Kim, P. Kruizinga, K. Homan, and S. Emelianov, Silica-coated gold nanorods as pho- toacoustic signal nanoamplifiers, Nano Letters11, 348 (2011)

    2011

  4. [12]

    Neumann, A

    O. Neumann, A. S. Urban, J. Day, S. Lal, P. Nordlan- der, and N. J. Halas, Solar vapor generation enabled by nanoparticles, ACS Nano7, 42 (2013)

    2013

  5. [13]

    C. Xie, P. Kang, J. Youn, B. A. Wilson, T. Zhang, L. Basavarajappa, Q. Wang, M. Kim, L. Li, K. Hoyt, J. H. Randrianalisoa, and Z. Qin, Mechanism of ampli- fied photoacoustic effect for silica-coated spherical gold nanoparticles, Nano Letters25, 1133 (2025)

    2025

  6. [14]

    Hirsch, R

    L. Hirsch, R. J. Stafford, J. Bankson, S. Sershen, B. Rivera, R. Price, J. Hazle, N. Halas, and J. West, Nanoshell-mediated near-infrared thermal therapy of tu- mors under magnetic resonance guidance, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of Amer...

    2003

  7. [15]

    E. Day, P. Thompson, L. Zhang, N. Lewinski, N. Ahmed, R. Drezek, S. Blaney, and J. West, Nanoshell-mediated photothermal therapy improves survival in a murine glioma model, Journal of neuro-oncology104, 55 (2010)

    2010

  8. [16]

    Khlebtsov and L

    N. Khlebtsov and L. Dykman, Optical properties and biomedical applications of plasmonic nanoparticles, Jour- nal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 111, 1 (2010). 17

    2010

  9. [17]

    X. Cui, Q. Ruan, X. Zhuo, X. Xia, J. Hu, R. Fu, Y. Li, J. Wang, and H. Xu, Photothermal nanomaterials: A powerful light-to-heat converter, Chemical Reviews123, 6891 (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    Link and M

    S. Link and M. A. El-Sayed, Size and temperature de- pendence of the plasmon absorption of colloidal gold nanoparticles, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B103, 4212 (1999)

    1999

  11. [19]

    Maier,Plasmonics - Fundamentals and Applications (Springer, 2007)

    S. Maier,Plasmonics - Fundamentals and Applications (Springer, 2007)

    2007

  12. [20]

    Moularas, Y

    C. Moularas, Y. Georgiou, K. Adamska, and Y. Deli- giannakis, Thermoplasmonic heat generation efficiency by nonmonodisperse core-shell ag@sio2 nanoparticle en- semble, J. Phys. Chem. C123, 22499 (2019)

    2019

  13. [21]

    P. Jain, X. Huang, I. El-Sayed, and M. El-Sayed, Review of some interesting surface plasmon resonance-enhanced properties of noble metal nanoparticles and their appli- cations to biosystems, Plasmonics2, 107 (2007)

    2007

  14. [22]

    Baffou, M

    G. Baffou, M. Kreuzer, F. Kulzer, and R. Quidant, Tem- perature mapping near plasmonic nanostructures using fluorescence polarization anisotropy, Opt. Express17, 3291 (2009)

    2009

  15. [23]

    A. O. Govorov and H. H. Richardson, Generating heat with metal nanoparticles, Nano Today2, 30 (2007)

    2007

  16. [24]

    M. Chen, Y. He, and J. Zhu, Quantifying and compar- ing the near-field enhancement, photothermal conversion, and local heating performance of plasmonic sio2@au core- shell nanoparticles, Plasmonics14(2019)

    2019

  17. [25]

    J. C. J. Mertens, B. Spitzbarth, R. Eelkema, J. Hunger, and M. A. van der Veen, Predicting and probing the local temperature rise around plasmonic core-shell nanoparticles to study thermally activated processes, ChemPlusChem124, 1088 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Larquey, H

    A. Larquey, H. Bellahsene, G. F´ elix, M. Beaudhuin, T. Pelluau, B. Bouvet, Y. Guari, S. Sene, and J. Lar- ionova, New heater@luminescent thermometer nano- objects: Prussian blue core@silica shell loaded withβ- diketonate tb3+/eu3+ complex, Mater. Chem. Front.9, 22499 (2025)

    2025

  19. [28]

    P. E. Hopkins, J. L. Kassebaum, and P. M. Norris, Ef- fects of electron scattering at metal-nonmetal interfaces on electron-phonon equilibration in gold films, Journal of Applied Physics105, 023710 (2009)

    2009

  20. [29]

    G. A. Pang, F. Poisson, J. Laufer, C. Haisch, and E. Bossy, Theoretical and experimental study of pho- toacoustic excitation of silica-coated gold nanospheres in water, J. Phys. Chem. C124, 1088 (2020)

    2020

  21. [30]

    Lombard, T

    J. Lombard, T. Biben, and S. Merabia, Electron–phonon effects on the photoacoustic response of gold core–silica shell nanoparticles: From the linear regime to nanocav- itation, The Journal of Chemical Physics156, 084701 (2022)

    2022

  22. [31]

    Alkurdi, J

    A. Alkurdi, J. Lombard, F. Detcheverry, and S. Merabia, Enhanced heat transfer with metal-dielectric core-shell nanoparticles, Phys. Rev. Appl.13, 034036 (2020)

    2020

  23. [32]

    Gonzalez-Colsa, F

    J. Gonzalez-Colsa, F. Bresme, and P. Albella, Impact of the interfacial thermal conductance on the thermoplas- monic response of metal/polymer hybrid nanoparticles under nanosecond pulsed illumination, J. Phys. Chem. C 127, 19152 (2023)

    2023

  24. [33]

    L. Guo, S. L. Hodson, T. S. Fisher, and X. Xu, Heat transfer across metal-dielectric interfaces during ultrafast-laser heating, Journal of Heat Transfer134, 042402 (2012)

    2012

  25. [34]

    H. Moon, H. Kim, D. Kumar, H. Kim, C. Sim, J. Chang, J. Kim, and D. Lim, Amplified photoacoustic perfor- mance and enhanced photothermal stability of reduced graphene oxide coated gold nanorods for sensitive pho- toacoustic imaging, ACS nano9, 2711 (2015)

    2015

  26. [35]

    El Hajj, C

    J. El Hajj, C. Adessi, M. de San Feliciano, G. Ledoux, and S. Merabia, Enhanced thermal conductance at inter- faces between gold and amorphous silicon and between gold and amorphous silica, Phys. Rev. B110, 115437 (2024)

    2024

  27. [36]

    P. E. Hopkins, B. Kaehr, L. M. Phinney, T. P. Koehler, A. M. Grillet, D. Dunphy, F. Garcia, and C. J. Brinker, Measuring the thermal conductivity of porous, transpar- ent sio2 films with time domain thermoreflectance, Jour- nal of Heat Transfer133, 061601 (2011)

    2011

  28. [37]

    S. I. Anisimov, B. L. Kapeliovich, and T. L. Perel’Man, Electron emission from metal surfaces exposed to ultra- short laser pulses, Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics39, 375 (1974)

    1974

  29. [38]

    S. Wang, L. Fu, Y. Zhang, J. Wang, and Z. Zhang, Quantitative evaluation and optimization of photother- mal bubble generation around overheated nanoparticles excited by pulsed lasers, The Journal of Physical Chem- istry C122, 24421 (2018)

    2018

  30. [39]

    Kittel,Introduction to Solid State Physics, 6th edition (Wiley, New York, 1986)

    C. Kittel,Introduction to Solid State Physics, 6th edition (Wiley, New York, 1986)

    1986

  31. [40]

    Fu and W

    Q. Fu and W. Sun, Mie theory for light scattering by a spherical particle in an absorbing medium, Appl. Opt. 40, 1354 (2001)

    2001

  32. [41]

    Lombard, F

    J. Lombard, F. Detcheverry, and S. Merabia, Influence of the electron-phonon interfacial conductance on the thermal transport at metal/dielectric interfaces, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter , 015007 (2015)

    2015

  33. [42]

    Tuersun and X

    P. Tuersun and X. Han, Optical absorption analysis and optimization of gold nanoshells, Appl. Opt.52, 1325 (2013)

    2013

  34. [43]

    W. C. Mundy, J. A. Roux, and A. M. Smith, Mie scat- tering by spheres in an absorbing medium∗, J. Opt. Soc. Am.64, 1593 (1974)

    1974

  35. [44]

    Frontmatter, inAbsorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles(John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 1998) pp. i– xiv

    1998

  36. [45]

    A. L. Aden and M. Kerker, Scattering of electromagnetic waves from two concentric spheres, Journal of Applied Physics22, 1242 (1951)

    1951

  37. [46]

    Kai and P

    L. Kai and P. Massoli, Scattering of electromagnetic- plane waves by radially inhomogeneous spheres: a finely stratified sphere model, Appl. Opt.33, 501 (1994)

    1994

  38. [47]

    D. W. Mackowski, R. A. Altenkirch, and M. P. Menguc, Internal absorption cross sections in a stratified sphere, Appl. Opt.29, 1551 (1990)

    1990

  39. [48]

    Vial, A.-S

    A. Vial, A.-S. Grimault, D. Mac ´ ıas, D. Barchiesi, and M. L. de la Chapelle, Improved analytical fit of gold dis- persion: Application to the modeling of extinction spec- tra with a finite-difference time-domain method, Phys. Rev. B71, 085416 (2005)

    2005

  40. [49]

    Drude, Zur elektronentheorie der metalle, Annalen der Physik306, 566 (1900)

    P. Drude, Zur elektronentheorie der metalle, Annalen der Physik306, 566 (1900)

    1900

  41. [50]

    Silaeva, L

    E. Silaeva, L. Saddier, and J.-P. Colombier, Drude- lorentz model for optical properties of photoexcited tran- sition metals under electron-phonon nonequilibrium, Ap- plied Sciences11(2021)

    2021

  42. [51]

    Pe˜ na-Rodr ´ ıguez, Modelling the dielectric function of au-ag alloys, Journal of Alloys and Compounds694, 857 (2017)

    O. Pe˜ na-Rodr ´ ıguez, Modelling the dielectric function of au-ag alloys, Journal of Alloys and Compounds694, 857 (2017)

    2017

  43. [52]

    P. B. Johnson and R. W. Christy, Optical constants of the noble metals, Phys. Rev. B6, 4370 (1972)

    1972

  44. [53]

    H. S. Sehmi, W. Langbein, and E. A. Muljarov, Opti- mizing the drude-lorentz model for material permittiv- ity: Method, program, and examples for gold, silver, and copper, Phys. Rev. B95, 115444 (2017). 18

    2017

  45. [54]

    P. D. Ndione, S. T. Weber, D. O. Gericke, and B. Reth- feld, Adaptive model for the optical properties of excited gold, Phys. Rev. B109, 115148 (2024)

    2024

  46. [55]

    Ndione, D

    P. Ndione, D. Gericke, and B. Rethfeld, Optical proper- ties of gold after intense short-pulse excitations, Frontiers in Physics10, 856817 (2022)

    2022

  47. [56]

    D. A. G. Bruggeman, Berechnung verschiedener physikalischer konstanten von heterogenen substanzen. i. dielektrizit¨ atskonstanten und leitf¨ ahigkeiten der mis- chk¨ orper aus isotropen substanzen, Annalen der Physik 416, 636 (1935)

    1935

  48. [57]

    Fourment, F

    C. Fourment, F. Deneuville, D. Descamps, F. Dorchies, S. Petit, O. Peyrusse, B. Holst, and V. Recoules, Experimental determination of temperature-dependent electron-electron collision frequency in isochorically heated warm dense gold, Phys. Rev. B89, 161110 (2014)

    2014

  49. [58]

    I. H. Malitson, Interspecimen comparison of the refrac- tive index of fused silica, J. Opt. Soc. Am.55, 1205 (1965)

    1965

  50. [59]

    Daimon and A

    M. Daimon and A. Masumura, Measurement of the re- fractive index of distilled water from the near-infrared re- gion to the ultraviolet region, Appl. Opt.46, 3811 (2007)

    2007

  51. [60]

    Sela and C

    M. Sela and C. Haspel, Predicting the refractive index of amorphous materials using the bruggeman effective medium approximation, Applied Optics59, 8822 (2020)

    2020

  52. [61]

    Landauer, The electrical resistance of binary metallic mixtures, Journal of Applied Physics23, 779 (1952)

    R. Landauer, The electrical resistance of binary metallic mixtures, Journal of Applied Physics23, 779 (1952)

    1952

  53. [62]

    Khardani, M

    M. Khardani, M. Bouaicha, and B. Bessa ¨ ıs, Bruggeman effective medium approach for modelling optical prop- erties of porous silicon: Comparison with experiment, physica status solidi (c)4, 1986 (2007)

    2007

  54. [63]

    Schmidt and M

    D. Schmidt and M. Schubert, Anisotropic bruggeman effective medium approaches for slanted columnar thin films, Journal of Applied Physics114, 083510 (2013)

    2013

  55. [64]

    A. D. Raki´ c, A. B. Djuriˇ si´ c, J. M. Elazar, and M. L. Ma- jewski, Optical properties of metallic films for vertical- cavity optoelectronic devices, Appl. Opt.37, 5271 (1998)

    1998

  56. [65]

    Gall, Electron mean free path in elemental metals, Journal of Applied Physics119, 085101 (2016)

    D. Gall, Electron mean free path in elemental metals, Journal of Applied Physics119, 085101 (2016)

    2016

  57. [66]

    Kreibig and M

    U. Kreibig and M. Vollmer,Optical Properties of Metal Clusters, Materials Science Series (Springer, 1995)

    1995

  58. [67]

    Huang and M

    X. Huang and M. A. El-Sayed, Gold nanoparticles: Op- tical properties and implementations in cancer diagno- sis and photothermal therapy, Journal of Advanced Re- search1, 13 (2010)

    2010

  59. [68]

    Munetoh, T

    S. Munetoh, T. Motooka, K. Moriguchi, and A. Shin- tani, Interatomic potential for si–o systems using tersoff parameterization, Computational Materials Science39, 334 (2007)

    2007

  60. [69]

    Derkachova, K

    A. Derkachova, K. Kolwas, and I. Demchenko, Dielec- tric function for gold in plasmonics applications: Size de- pendence of plasmon resonance frequencies and damping rates for nanospheres, Plasmonics11(2016)

    2016

  61. [70]

    A. P. Thompson, H. M. Aktulga, R. Berger, D. S. Bolin- tineanu, W. M. Brown, P. S. Crozier, P. J. in ’t Veld, A. Kohlmeyer, S. G. Moore, T. D. Nguyen, R. Shan, M. J. Stevens, J. Tranchida, C. Trott, and S. J. Plimpton, LAMMPS - a flexible simulation tool for particle-based mat...

    2022

  62. [71]

    Stukowski, Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO-the Open Visualization Tool, MODELLING AND SIMULATION IN MATERI- ALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING18(2010)

    A. Stukowski, Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO-the Open Visualization Tool, MODELLING AND SIMULATION IN MATERI- ALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING18(2010)

    2010

  63. [72]

    Rabani, A

    R. Rabani, A. Rajabpour, L. Joly, M. Hassan Saidi, and S. Merabia, Enhanced heat flow between charged nanoparticles and an aqueous electrolyte, Langmuir39, 15222–15230 (2023)

    2023

  64. [73]

    Heinz, R

    H. Heinz, R. A. Vaia, B. L. Farmer, and R. R. Naik, Accurate simulation of surfaces and interfaces of face- centered cubic metals using 12-6 and 9-6 lennard-jones potentials, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C112, 17281 (2008)

    2008

  65. [74]

    A. K. Rappe, C. J. Casewit, K. S. Colwell, W. A. I. God- dard, and W. M. Skiff, Uff, a full periodic table force field for molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics simu- lations, Journal of the American Chemical Society114, 10024 (1992)

    1992

  66. [75]

    Gutierrez-Varela, S

    O. Gutierrez-Varela, S. Merabia, and R. Santamaria, Size-dependent effects of the thermal transport at gold nanoparticle–water interfaces., J. Chem. Phys.157, 084702 (2022)

    2022

  67. [76]

    B. A. Luty and W. F. van Gunsteren, Calculating elec- trostatic interactions using the particle-particle particle- mesh method with nonperiodic long-range interactions, The Journal of Physical Chemistry100, 2581 (1996)

    1996

  68. [77]

    J. L. F. Abascal and C. Vega, A general purpose model for the condensed phases of water: Tip4p/2005, The Journal of Chemical Physics123, 234505 (2005)

    2005

  69. [78]

    R¨ omer, A

    F. R¨ omer, A. Lervik, and F. Bresme, Nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations of the thermal conduc- tivity of water: A systematic investigation of the spc/e and tip4p/2005 models, The Journal of Chemical Physics 137, 074503 (2012)

    2012

  70. [79]

    P. S. Crozier, R. L. Rowley, and D. Henderson, Molecular-dynamics simulations of ion size effects on the fluid structure of aqueous electrolyte systems be- tween charged model electrodes, The Journal of Chemical Physics114, 7513 (2001)

    2001

  71. [80]

    M. F. D¨ opke, J. L¨ utzenkirchen, O. A. Moultos, B. Si- boulet, J.-F. Dufrˆ eche, J. T. Padding, and R. Hartkamp, Preferential adsorption in mixed electrolytes confined by charged amorphous silica, The Journal of Physical Chem- istry C123, 16711 (2019)

    2019

  72. [81]

    P. E. M. Lopes, V. Murashov, M. Tazi, E. Demchuk, and A. D. MacKerell, Development of an empirical force field for silica. application to the quartz-water interface, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B110, 2782 (2006)

    2006

  73. [82]

    Z. Xu, D. Huang, and T. Luo, Molecular-level under- standing of efficient thermal transport across the sil- ica–water interface, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C125, 24115 (2021)

    2021

  74. [83]

    H. A. Lorentz, Ueber die Anwendung des Satzes vom Virial in der kinetischen Theorie der Gase, Annalen der Physik248, 127 (1881)

  75. [84]

    Surblys, H

    D. Surblys, H. Matsubara, G. Kikugawa, and T. Ohara, Application of atomic stress to compute heat flux via molecular dynamics for systems with many-body inter- actions, Phys. Rev. E99, 051301 (2019)

    2019

  76. [85]

    France-Lanord, S

    A. France-Lanord, S. Merabia, T. Albaret, D. Lacroix, and K. Termentzidis, Thermal properties of amor- phous/crystalline silicon superlattices, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter26, 355801 (2014)

    2014

  77. [86]

    Nakano, L

    A. Nakano, L. Bi, R. K. Kalia, and P. Vashishta, Struc- tural correlations in porous silica: Molecular dynamics simulation on a parallel computer, Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 85 (1993)

    1993

  78. [87]

    S. P. Patil, V. G. Parale, H.-H. Park, and B. Markert, Mechanical modeling and simulation of aerogels: A re- view, Ceramics International47, 2981 (2021). 19

    2021

  79. [88]

    J. M. Larkin and A. J. H. McGaughey, Thermal conduc- tivity accumulation in amorphous silica and amorphous silicon, Phys. Rev. B89, 144303 (2014)

    2014

  80. [89]

    Boone, H

    P. Boone, H. Babaei, and C. E. Wilmer, Heat flux for many-body interactions: corrections to lammps, Journal of chemical theory and computation15, 5579 (2019)

    2019

  81. [90]

    W. Zhu, G. Zheng, S. Cao, and H. He, Thermal conduc- tivity of amorphous sio2 thin film: A molecular dynamics study, Scientific Reports8(2018)

    2018

  82. [91]

    Huang, Z

    Z. Huang, Z. Tang, J. Yu, and S. Bai, Thermal conductiv- ity of amorphous and crystalline thin films by molecular dynamics simulation, Physica B: Condensed Matter404, 1790 (2009)

    2009

  83. [92]

    Nos´ e, A unified formulation of the constant tempera- ture molecular dynamics methods, Journal of Chemical Physics81, 511 (1984)

    S. Nos´ e, A unified formulation of the constant tempera- ture molecular dynamics methods, Journal of Chemical Physics81, 511 (1984)

    1984

  84. [93]

    Y. Yan, S. C. King, M. Li, T. Galy, M. Marszewski, J. S. Kang, L. Pilon, Y. Hu, and S. H. Tolbert, Exploring the effect of porous structure on thermal conductivity in tem- plated mesoporous silica films, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C123, 21721 (2019)

    2019

  85. [94]

    +σ es”), we also analyze cases in which this coupling is neglected (denoted by “–σ es

    and is shown in Table IV. For the silica-water interface, the same NEMD ap- proach is employed. The silica thin film serves as an intermediate medium for heat transfer between gold and 8 water. The ITC at the silica-water interface is ob- tained by measuring the steady-state t...

  86. [95]

    R. M. Costescu, A. J. Bullen, G. Matamis, K. E. O’Hara, and D. G. Cahill, Thermal conductivity and sound veloc- ities of hydrogen-silsesquioxane low-kdielectrics, Phys. Rev. B65, 094205 (2002)

    2002

  87. [96]

    Ghanbarian and H

    B. Ghanbarian and H. Daigle, Thermal conductivity in porous media: Percolation-based effective-medium ap- proximation, Water Resources Research52, 295 (2016)

    2016

  88. [97]

    W. G. Hoover, Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase- space distributions, Phys. Rev. A31, 1695 (1985)

    1985

  89. [98]

    S. M. Hatamlee, F. Jabbari, and A. Rajabpour, Inter- facial thermal conductance between gold and sio 2 : A molecular dynamics study, Nanoscale and Microscale Thermophysical Engineering26, 40–51 (2022)

    2022

  90. [99]

    H. Sun, D. Surblys, S. Cheng, and T. Ohara, Molecular dynamics study on the effect of surface ionization on the interfacial heat transfer between silica and water, Applied Thermal Engineering244, 122762 (2024)

    2024

  91. [100]

    Zhang, W

    H. Zhang, W. Gu, M.-J. Li, W.-Z. Fang, Z.-Y. Li, and W.-Q. Tao, Influence of environmental factors on the ad- sorption capacity and thermal conductivity of silica nano- porous materials, Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotech- nology15, 3048 (2015)

    2015

  92. [101]

    P. Kang, Y. Wang, B. A. Wilson, Y. Liu, N. Dawkrajai, J. Randrianalisoa, and Z. Qin, Nanoparticle fragmenta- tion below the melting point under single picosecond laser pulse stimulation, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 125, 26718 (2021)

    2021

  93. [102]

    Gutierrez-Varela, J

    O. Gutierrez-Varela, J. Lombard, T. Biben, R. San- tamaria, and S. Merabia, Vapor nanobubbles around heated nanoparticles: Wetting dependence of the local fluid thermodynamics and kinetics of nucleation, Lang- muir39, 18263 (2023)

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.