From Unstructured Text to Causal Knowledge Graphs: A Transformer-Based Approach
read the original abstract
Qualitative causal relationships compactly express the direction, dependency, temporal constraints, and monotonicity constraints of discrete or continuous interactions in the world. In everyday or academic language, we may express interactions between quantities (e.g., sleep decreases stress), between discrete events or entities (e.g., a protein inhibits another protein's transcription), or between intentional or functional factors (e.g., hospital patients pray to relieve their pain). Extracting and representing these diverse causal relations are critical for cognitive systems that operate in domains spanning from scientific discovery to social science. This paper presents a transformer-based NLP architecture that jointly extracts knowledge graphs including (1) variables or factors described in language, (2) qualitative causal relationships over these variables, (3) qualifiers and magnitudes that constrain these causal relationships, and (4) word senses to localize each extracted node within a large ontology. We do not claim that our transformer-based architecture is itself a cognitive system; however, we provide evidence of its accurate knowledge graph extraction in real-world domains and the practicality of its resulting knowledge graphs for cognitive systems that perform graph-based reasoning. We demonstrate this approach and include promising results in two use cases, processing textual inputs from academic publications, news articles, and social media.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Generating Literature-Driven Scientific Theories at Scale
Literature-grounded LLM synthesis of theories from 13.7k papers yields 2.9k theories that better match evidence and predict future results from 4.6k subsequent papers than parametric baselines.
-
Large Language Models for Causal Relations Extraction in Social Media: A Validation Framework for Disaster Intelligence
The authors introduce a validation framework showing LLMs can pull causal links from disaster social media but require checks against post-event evidence to avoid relying on model priors.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.