Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Algorithmically-Consistent Deep Learning Frameworks for Structural Topology Optimization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.05359 v2 pith:TIUGV6QT submitted 2020-12-09 cs.LG

Algorithmically-Consistent Deep Learning Frameworks for Structural Topology Optimization

classification cs.LG
keywords optimizationtopologycurrentframeworkslearningmethodsapproachapproaches
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Topology optimization has emerged as a popular approach to refine a component's design and increase its performance. However, current state-of-the-art topology optimization frameworks are compute-intensive, mainly due to multiple finite element analysis iterations required to evaluate the component's performance during the optimization process. Recently, machine learning (ML)-based topology optimization methods have been explored by researchers to alleviate this issue. However, previous ML approaches have mainly been demonstrated on simple two-dimensional applications with low-resolution geometry. Further, current methods are based on a single ML model for end-to-end prediction, which requires a large dataset for training. These challenges make it non-trivial to extend current approaches to higher resolutions. In this paper, we develop deep learning-based frameworks consistent with traditional topology optimization algorithms for 3D topology optimization with a reasonably fine (high) resolution. We achieve this by training multiple networks, each learning a different step of the overall topology optimization methodology, making the framework more consistent with the topology optimization algorithm. We demonstrate the application of our framework on both 2D and 3D geometries. The results show that our approach predicts the final optimized design better (5.76x reduction in total compliance MSE in 2D; 2.03x reduction in total compliance MSE in 3D) than current ML-based topology optimization methods.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.