Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Training Large Language Models to Reason via EM Policy Gradient

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.18587 v1 pith:TKKPQ7VG submitted 2025-04-24 cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIstat.ML
keywords reasoninggradientpolicymodelsgrpolearningmethodoff-policy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recently, foundation models such as OpenAI's O1 and O3, along with DeepSeek's R1, have demonstrated strong reasoning capacities and problem-solving skills acquired through large-scale reinforcement learning (RL), with wide applications in mathematics, coding, science, intelligent agents, and virtual assistants. In this work, we introduce an off-policy reinforcement learning algorithm, EM Policy Gradient, aimed at enhancing LLM reasoning by optimizing expected return over reasoning trajectories. We frame the reasoning task as an Expectation-Maximization (EM) optimization problem, alternating between sampling diverse rationale trajectories and performing reward-guided fine-tuning. Unlike PPO and GRPO, which rely on complex importance weights and heuristic clipping, our method provides a simpler, more principled off-policy policy gradient approach, eliminating these complexities while maintaining strong performance. We evaluate the effectiveness of EM Policy Gradient on the GSM8K and MATH (HARD) datasets, where it achieves performance comparable to or slightly surpassing the state-of-the-art GRPO, while offering additional advantages in scalability, simplicity, and reasoning conciseness. Moreover, models fine-tuned with our method exhibit cognitive behaviors, such as sub-problem decomposition, self-verification, and backtracking, highlighting its potential to enhance both the interpretability and robustness of LLM reasoning.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Large Language Models Reasoning Abilities Under Non-Ideal Conditions After RL-Fine-Tuning

    cs.AI 2025-08 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    RL fine-tuning of LLMs improves clean-benchmark accuracy while degrading accuracy under three injected-distractor evaluation scenarios, though one of the three scenarios contradicts the headline claim.

Pith tools