Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Growing a Tail: Increasing Output Diversity in Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.02989 v2 pith:TKXZKLCN submitted 2024-11-05 cs.CL cs.CY

classification cs.CLcs.CY
keywords diversitymodelsoutputsresponsesdiverselanguageoutputexamine
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

How diverse are the outputs of large language models when diversity is desired? We examine the diversity of responses of several language models to questions with multiple possible answers, comparing them with human responses. Our findings suggest that models' responses are highly concentrated, reflecting narrow, mainstream outputs, in comparison to humans, whose responses exhibit a much longer-tail. We examine three simple and practical ways to increase output diversity: 1) increasing generation randomness via temperature sampling; 2) prompting models to answer from diverse perspectives using a single prompt; 3) aggregating outputs from several models. We find that these interventions, especially when combined, can substantially increase output diversity, although single-model outputs generally remain less diverse than the human baseline. We discuss potential implications of these findings for future work in AI policy and governance that wishes to preserve cultural diversity, an essential building block of a democratic social fabric.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Basic B*** Effect: The Use of LLM-based Agents Reduces the Distinctiveness and Diversity of People's Choices

    cs.HC 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLM-based agents asked to choose among a person's own Facebook likes select more popular and less diverse pages, reducing both interpersonal distinctiveness and intrapersonal diversity.

Pith tools