Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Observational constraints and diagnostics for time-dependent dark energy models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1603.00699 v1 pith:TLW4HQ2H submitted 2016-03-02 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-ph

classification gr-qcastro-ph.COhep-ph
keywords statefinderdiagnosticsmodelstddedarkenergygrowthhierarchy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

In this paper, we constrain four time-dependent dark energy (TDDE) models by using the Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia), baryonic acoustic oscillations (BAO), observational Hubble parameter (OHD) data-sets as well as the single data point from the newest event GW150914. Subsequently, adopting the best fitting values of the model parameters, we apply the original statefinder, statefinder hierarchy, the growth rate of matter perturbations and $Om(z)$ diagnostics to distinguish the TDDE scenarios and the $\Lambda$CDM scenario from each other. We discover that all the TDDE models and $\Lambda$CDM model can be distinguished better at the present epoch by using the statefinder hierarchy than using the original statefinder, the growth rate of matter perturbations and $Om(z)$ diagnostics, especially, in the planes of $\{S_3^{(1)},S_4^{(1)}\}$, $\{S_3^{(2)},S_4^{(2)}\}$, $\{S_5^{(1)},S_5^{(2)}\}$ and $\{S_4^{(2)},S_5^{(2)}\}$.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools