Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Roles of $\bar{D}^{*}K^{*}$ and $D^*\bar{D}$ molecular states in decay $B^+ \to D^{*+} D^- K^+$

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The authors use the decay $B^+\to D^{*+}D^-K^+$ to argue that the enhancement near 2900 MeV in the $D^-K^+$ spectrum identifies $T^*_{\bar{c}\bar{s}0}(2870)^0$ as a $\bar{D}^*K^*$ molecular state, while the $D^*\bar{D}$ molecule leaves no…

desk verdict A plausible molecular-state analysis of B+ -> D*+ D- K+, but the headline claim about the 2870 state is undermined by an added Breit-Wigner term at 2900 MeV unless the paper shows a decomposition. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.12686 v2 pith:TLXFHH3S submitted 2025-08-18 hep-ph

Zuo-Ming Ding , Qi Huang , Jun He This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ph
keywords B+->D*+D-K+decayhadronicmoleculesT*_{cbars0}(2870)^0chi_{c1}(3872)one-boson-exchangemodelquasipotentialBethe-Salpeterequationinvariantmassspectrumexotichadrons
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tests whether two exotic states can be understood as hadronic molecules by computing the decay $B^+\to D^{*+}D^-K^+$. The $\bar{D}^*K^*$ molecular amplitude produces a pronounced enhancement near 2900 MeV in the $D^-K^+$ invariant mass spectrum, which the authors read as support for identifying $T^*_{\bar{c}\bar{s}0}(2870)^0$ as a $\bar{D}^*K^*$ molecule. The $D^*\bar{D}$ molecular amplitude, in contrast, leaves the $D^-K^+$ and $D^{*+}D^-$ spectra essentially unchanged, so the paper concludes that $\chi_{c1}(3872)$ is not naturally a $D^*\bar{D}$ molecule. If correct, the decay becomes a direct experimental probe of molecular internal structure, and the 2900 MeV peak is a specific prediction of the molecular picture.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the one-boson-exchange model for the $\bar{D}^*K^*$ and $D^*\bar{D}$ interactions, with effective Lagrangians supplying the vertices. Solving the quasipotential Bethe-Salpeter equation for these kernels yields the molecular pole positions and the rescattering amplitudes that enter the three-body decay. The decay amplitudes are then combined with Monte Carlo simulation to produce the $D^-K^+$ and $D^{*+}D^-$ invariant mass spectra. Additional Breit-Wigner terms for $T^*_{\bar{c}\bar{s}1}(2900)^0$, $\chi_{c1}(4010)$, and $h_c(4300)$ are added to reproduce the measured shapes. The paper's central contrast is that the $\bar{D}^*K^*$ pole generates the 2900 MeV structure while the $D^*\bar{D}$ pole does not generate the $\chi_{c1}(3872)$ structure.

What would settle it

Re-run the Monte Carlo simulation with the extra $T^*_{\bar{c}\bar{s}1}(2900)^0$ resonance removed while keeping the $\bar{D}^*K^*$ molecular amplitude. If the 2900 MeV enhancement vanishes, the claimed molecular signal is an artifact of the added resonance; if it persists, the molecular pole is doing the work.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the $D^-K^+$ invariant mass distribution of $B^+\to D^{*+}D^-K^+$ distinguishes the two molecular hypotheses. When the pole from the $\bar{D}^*K^*$ system, obtained by solving the quasipotential Bethe-Salpeter equation with one-boson-exchange kernels, is included in the decay amplitude, the spectrum shows a clear enhancement near 2900 MeV that matches the state $T^*_{\bar{c}\bar{s}0}(2870)^0$. The authors conclude that this state is supported as a $\bar{D}^*K^*$ molecular state. The analogous $D^*\bar{D}$ molecular amplitude produces no significant structure in either spectrum, which the authors take as evidence against interpreting $\chi_{c1}(3872)$ as a $D^*\bar{D}$ molecule. To fit the data, the amplitude also includes Breit-Wigner contributions from $T^*_{\bar{c}\bar{s}1}(2900)^0$, $\chi_{c1}(4010)$, and $h_c(4300)$.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis depends on the model's computed molecular poles being physical and on the extra resonance shapes added to match the data not being what actually creates the 2900 MeV bump.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the $\bar{D}^*K^*$ molecular interpretation is right, the 2900 MeV enhancement in $B^+\to D^{*+}D^-K^+$ is produced by final-state rescattering and should reappear in related $B$-decay modes.
  • The absence of a $D^*\bar{D}$ molecular signal weakens the case that $\chi_{c1}(3872)$ is a $D^*\bar{D}$ molecule, shifting molecular-model searches toward other configurations.
  • The $D^-K^+$ line shape near 2900 MeV becomes a quantitative observable for testing the molecular pole's mass and width against future high-statistics data.
  • The tuned Breit-Wigner terms are part of the model comparison, so the molecular claim can be checked by whether the extra terms remain necessary once the molecular amplitudes are included.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the same machinery could be applied to the charge-conjugate decay and to $B_s^0$ analogues; agreement of the predicted 2900 MeV line shape across channels would test the molecular assignment without additional parameter tuning.
  • Editorial inference: a robustness check the paper does not report is varying the cutoff of the one-boson-exchange potential and checking whether the 2900 MeV enhancement survives; if it moves or disappears, the molecular pole is not the stable origin of the signal.
  • Editorial inference: the negative result for the $D^*\bar{D}$ molecule does not rule out other molecular or compact interpretations of $\chi_{c1}(3872)$; it only speaks against this specific molecule in this decay.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the three-body decay B^+ -> D^{*+} D^- K^+ as a probe of hadronic molecular states. Within a one-boson-exchange model, the authors construct interaction kernels for the \bar{D}^*K^* and D^*\bar{D} systems, solve the quasipotential Bethe-Salpeter equation to obtain rescattering amplitudes and poles, and then insert these amplitudes into a Monte Carlo simulation of the D^-K^+ and D^{*+}D^- invariant mass spectra. To match the data, the authors add incoherent Breit-Wigner contributions from T^*_{c\bar{s}1}(2900)^0, \chi_{c1}(4010), and h_c(4300). The central claim is that a pronounced enhancement near 2900 MeV in the D^-K^+ spectrum strongly supports interpreting T^*_{c\bar{s}0}(2870)^0 as a \bar{D}^*K^* molecular state, while the absence of a sizeable D^*\bar{D} molecular effect disfavours a molecular interpretation of \chi_{c1}(3872).

Significance. If the central claim were established, the paper would provide a useful new decay channel for testing the molecular hypothesis for T^*_{c\bar{s}0}(2870)^0 and would add a quantitative negative result for the D^*\bar{D} interpretation of \chi_{c1}(3872). The model setup is concrete and the numerical machinery (quasipotential Bethe-Salpeter amplitudes plus Monte Carlo spectra) is appropriate for this type of analysis. However, the significance as presented is limited because the main phenomenological evidence, the 2900 MeV enhancement, sits at the same mass as one of the Breit-Wigner states that were added specifically to reproduce the data; the paper does not demonstrate that the molecular amplitude alone produces that enhancement.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that, to better reproduce the experimental data, additional Breit-Wigner contributions from T^*_{c\bar{s}1}(2900)^0, \chi_{c1}(4010), and h_c(4300) are included. The same abstract then cites a pronounced enhancement near 2900 MeV as strongly supporting the \bar{D}^*K^* molecular interpretation. Because 2900 MeV is the mass of one of the added Breit-Wigner states, this is a masking risk, not a cosmetic issue: the enhancement may be dominated by the added term rather than by the molecular amplitude. The paper should show the D^-K^+ spectrum with and without each of the Breit-Wigner terms, or provide a fit-fraction decomposition, before the molecular-support claim can be evaluated.
  2. [Results (spectra)] The \bar{D}^*K^* molecular pole is reported near 2870 MeV, below the \bar{D}^*K^* threshold of about 2902 MeV. For a bound state below threshold, the contribution to the 2900 MeV region is expected to be a threshold/cusp-like enhancement rather than a clean resonance peak. The paper should display the molecular contribution alone in this region and compare its shape with the data. Without that decomposition, a peak near 2900 MeV is more naturally attributable to the added T^*_{c\bar{s}1}(2900)^0 Breit-Wigner term.
  3. [Model and fit] The Breit-Wigner masses and widths, as well as the regulator/cutoff parameters in the one-boson-exchange form factors, are free inputs. The paper gives no uncertainty estimates, no fit-quality measure, and no sensitivity study for these parameters. Since the central claim relies on the decomposition of the 2900 MeV region, the authors should provide quantitative information on how the molecular contribution varies with the cutoff and how the fit quality changes when the added Breit-Wigner terms are varied. This is needed to support the word 'strongly' in the abstract.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Introduction] The states T^*_{c\bar{s}0}(2870)^0 and T^*_{c\bar{s}1}(2900)^0 should be introduced with their quantum numbers and experimental status at first use, and the notation should be checked for consistency throughout.
  2. [Method] Please specify whether the molecular amplitudes and the added Breit-Wigner amplitudes are combined coherently or incoherently. If they are added incoherently, a brief justification is needed, since interference effects can be important for three-body final states.
  3. [Monte Carlo simulation] The Monte Carlo description should state the number of generated events, the phase-space sampling method, and whether detector acceptance or efficiency effects are included. This information is necessary for the reader to interpret the statistical fluctuations visible in the spectra.
  4. [Figures] The spectra figures should identify each curve (full result, molecular contribution alone, each Breit-Wigner contribution separately) with a legend, and the experimental data points should be referenced with their source and luminosity.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

The claimed 2900 MeV enhancement supporting the molecular interpretation is contaminated by a Breit-Wigner term added at the same mass to reproduce the data.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "To better reproduce the experimental data, additional Breit-Wigner contributions from $T^*_{\bar{c}\bar{s}1}(2900)^0$, $\chi_{c1}(4010)$, and $h_c(4300)$ are included. The results show a pronounced enhancement near 2900 MeV in the $D^-K^+$ invariant mass spectrum, strongly supporting the interpretation of $T^*_{\bar{c}\bar{s}0}(2870)^0$ as a $\bar{D}^{*}K^{*}$ molecular state."

    The central evidence cited for the molecular interpretation is a 'pronounced enhancement near 2900 MeV'. That energy coincides with one of the added Breit-Wigner states, $T^*_{\bar{c}\bar{s}1}(2900)^0$, which was introduced specifically 'to better reproduce the experimental data'. Without a decomposition showing that the molecular amplitude alone generates the 2900 MeV enhancement, the same data feature is being used both to fit the BW term and then to validate the molecular-state hypothesis. The fitted BW input is thus effectively relabeled as independent support for the $\bar{D}^*K^*$ molecular picture.

full rationale

The paper does not exhibit a self-citation chain or a definitional equivalence between the molecular pole and the final claim; the $\bar{D}^*K^*$ molecular state is explicitly treated as a hypothesis to be tested, and the qBSE/OBE calculation is a genuine dynamical framework. However, the abstract reveals a concrete fitted-input problem: the 2900 MeV enhancement, which is the main phenomenological support for the molecular interpretation, sits at the same energy as the $T^*_{\bar{c}\bar{s}1}(2900)^0$ Breit-Wigner term added to match experiment. Because the paper does not report a decomposition isolating the molecular contribution, the enhancement cannot be cleanly attributed to the molecular amplitude. This is a partial circularity of the 'fitted input called prediction' type. No additional circular steps could be verified from the available garbled full text, and no load-bearing self-citation was identifiable. The score of 5 reflects that the central spectral evidence is compromised, while the underlying dynamical calculation retains independent content.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

These are the assumptions and parameters needed to make the central claim work; most are not quantifiable from the abstract alone.

free parameters (2)
  • Breit-Wigner masses and widths for T*_{cbar s1}(2900)^0, chi_{c1}(4010), h_c(4300) = not stated
    These are included to reproduce experimental data; their parameters are likely taken from experiment or fitted, which can absorb missing physics.
  • Regulator/cutoff in one-boson-exchange form factors = not stated
    Typical in OBE models; the abstract does not specify whether these are fixed or varied to match the molecular pole positions.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption T*_{cbar s0}(2870)^0 and chi_{c1}(3872) are assumed to be D-bar* K* and D* D-bar molecules, respectively.
    This is the starting hypothesis of the paper; it is not derived.
  • domain assumption Validity of one-boson-exchange and effective Lagrangians for these heavy meson systems.
    The interaction kernels are built from these models; their reliability is assumed.
  • standard math Quasipotential Bethe-Salpeter equation provides accurate scattering amplitudes and pole positions.
    This is a standard technique in hadron physics, but the truncation and kernel are model-dependent.
  • ad hoc to paper Additional Breit-Wigner resonances do not double-count or mask the molecular contributions.
    These are added ad hoc to reproduce data; if they overlap with the molecular signals, the separation is questionable.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Roles of $\bar{D}^{*}K^{*}$ and $D^*\bar{D}$ molecular states in decay $B^+ \to D^{*+} D^- K^+$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TLXFHH3S

@misc{pith2026250812686,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Roles of $\barD^*K^*$ and $D^*\barD$ molecular states in decay $B^+ \to D^*+ D^- K^+$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TLXFHH3S}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.12686}
}
abstract

This study investigates the three-body decay process $B^+ \to D^{*+} D^- K^+$, aiming to explore the possible origins of $T^*_{\bar{c}\bar{s}0}(2870)^0$ and $\chi_{c1}(3872)$ as intermediate states. Within the molecular state framework, $T^*_{\bar{c}\bar{s}0}(2870)^0$ and $\chi_{c1}(3872)$ are considered as possible $\bar{D}^{*}K^{}$ and $D^*\bar{D}$ molecular states, respectively. Using effective Lagrangians, the interaction kernels of the $\bar{D}^{*}K^{*}$ and $D^*\bar{D}$ systems are constructed within the one-boson-exchange model. The corresponding rescattering amplitudes and pole positions are obtained by solving the quasipotential Bethe-Salpeter equation. These amplitudes are incorporated into the decay amplitude of the three-body process, and the $D^-K^+$ and $D^{*+}D^-$ invariant mass spectra are simulated via Monte Carlo methods. To better reproduce the experimental data, additional Breit-Wigner contributions from $T^*_{\bar{c}\bar{s}1}(2900)^0$, $\chi_{c1}(4010)$, and $h_c(4300)$ are included. The results show a pronounced enhancement near 2900 MeV in the $D^-K^+$ invariant mass spectrum, strongly supporting the interpretation of $T^*_{\bar{c}\bar{s}0}(2870)^0$ as a $\bar{D}^{*}K^{*}$ molecular state. While the $\bar{D}^{*}K^{*}$ molecular state provides a reasonable contribution to the $D^-K^+$ spectrum, the $D^*\bar{D}$ molecular state yields no significant effect on either the $D^-K^+$ or $D^{*+}D^-$ distributions. This suggests that the observed $\chi_{c1}(3872)$ structure around 3872 MeV may not be interpreted as a $D^*\bar{D}$ molecular state.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Predicting charmed-strange molecular tetraquarks with $K^{(*)}$ and $T$-doublet charmed or anticharmed meson

    hep-ph 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    X1(2900) is interpreted as a coupled K Dbar1 / K* Dbar1 / K* Dbar2* molecule, and a series of charmed-strange molecular tetraquark partners are predicted.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. [LHCb], ``Observation of New Charmonium or Charmoniumlike States in B^+ D^ * D^ K^+ Decays,'' Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024) no.13, 131902

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. [LHCb], ``A model-independent study of resonant structure in B^+ D^+D^-K^+ decays,'' Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020), 242001

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. [LHCb], ``Amplitude analysis of the B^+ D^+D^-K^+ decay,'' Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020), 112003

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    M. Z. Liu, J. J. Xie and L. S. Geng, `` X_0(2866) as a D^* K ^* molecular state,'' Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) no.9, 091502

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    H. W. Ke, Y. F. Shi, X. H. Liu and X. Q. Li, ``Possible molecular states of D *K* (D*K*) and new exotic states X0(2900), X1(2900), Tcs0a(2900)0 and Tcs0a(2900)++,'' Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) no.11, 114032

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Z. Yu, Q. Wu and D. Y. Chen, `` X_0(2900) and its spin partners productions in the B^+ decay processes,'' Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (2024) no.9, 985

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Ikeno, M

    N. Ikeno, M. Bayar and E. Oset, ``Molecular states of D*D*K * nature,'' Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) no.3, 034006

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    M. W. Hu, X. Y. Lao, P. Ling and Q. Wang, `` X_0 (2900) and its heavy quark spin partners in molecular picture,'' Chin. Phys. C 45 (2021) no.2, 021003

    work page 2021

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    Z. Y. Yang, Q. Wang and W. Chen, ``Production and decay of the X0(2900) state with different interpretations,'' Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) no.7, 076030

    2025

  2. [10]

    H. X. Chen, W. Chen, R. R. Dong and N. Su, `` X_0 (2900) and X_1 (2900): Hadronic Molecules or Compact Tetraquarks,'' Chin. Phys. Lett. 37 (2020) no.10, 101201

    2020

  3. [11]

    F. X. Liu, R. H. Ni, X. H. Zhong and Q. Zhao, ``Charmed-strange tetraquarks and their decays in the potential quark model,'' Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) no.9, 096020

    2023

  4. [12]

    Z. G. Wang, ``Analysis of the X_0(2900) as the scalar tetraquark state via the QCD sum rules,'' Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 35 (2020) no.30, 2050187

    2020

  5. [13]

    J. R. Zhang, ``Open-charm tetraquark candidate: Note on X_0 (2900),'' Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) no.5, 054019

    2021

  6. [14]

    D. K. Lian, W. Chen, H. X. Chen, L. Y. Dai and T. G. Steele, ``Strong decays of T^a_ c s 0 (2900)^ ++/0 as a fully open-flavor tetraquark state,'' Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (2024) no.1, 1-10

    2024

  7. [15]

    R. M. Albuquerque, S. Narison, D. Rabetiarivony and G. Randriamanatrika, ``The New Charm-Strange Resonances in the D^- K^+ Channel,'' Nucl. Part. Phys. Proc. 312-317 (2021), 125-129

    2021

  8. [16]

    Molina and E

    R. Molina and E. Oset, ``The Tcs (2900) as a threshold effect from the interaction of the D*K*, D*s channels,'' EPJ Web Conf. 291 (2024), 03010

    2024

  9. [17]

    T. J. Burns and E. S. Swanson, ``Kinematical cusp and resonance interpretations of the X(2900) ,'' Phys. Lett. B 813 (2021), 136057

    2021

  10. [18]

    Molina, T

    R. Molina, T. Branz and E. Oset, ``A new interpretation for the D^*_ s2 (2573) and the prediction of novel exotic charmed mesons,'' Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010), 014010

    2010

  11. [19]

    H. X. Chen, ``Hadronic molecules in B decays,'' Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) no.9, 094003

    2022

  12. [20]

    Wang and S

    B. Wang and S. L. Zhu, ``How to understand the X(2900)?,'' Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022) no.5, 419

    2022

  13. [21]

    He and D

    J. He and D. Y. Chen, ``Molecular picture for X_0(2900) and X_1(2900) ,'' Chin. Phys. C 45 (2021) no.6, 063102

    2021

  14. [22]

    S. Y. Kong, J. T. Zhu, D. Song and J. He, ``Heavy-strange meson molecules and possible candidates Ds0*(2317), Ds1(2460), and X0(2900),'' Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) no.9, 094012

    2021

  15. [23]

    Z. M. Ding, Q. Huang and J. He, `` X_0(2900) and _ c0 (3930) in process B^+ D^+ D^- K^+ ,'' Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (2024) no.8, 822

    2024

  16. [24]

    X. Liu, Z. G. Luo, Y. R. Liu and S. L. Zhu, ``X(3872) and Other Possible Heavy Molecular States,'' Eur. Phys. J. C 61 (2009), 411-428

    2009

  17. [25]

    M. T. AlFiky, F. Gabbiani and A. A. Petrov, ``X(3872): Hadronic molecules in effective field theory,'' Phys. Lett. B 640 (2006), 238-245

    2006

  18. [26]

    Z. G. Wang and T. Huang, ``Possible assignments of the X(3872) , Z_c(3900) and Z_b(10610) as axial-vector molecular states,'' Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) no.5, 2891

    2014

  19. [27]

    Y. Dong, A. Faessler, T. Gutsche, S. Kovalenko and V. E. Lyubovitskij, ``X(3872) as a hadronic molecule and its decays to charmonium states and pions,'' Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009), 094013

    2009

  20. [28]

    He, ``Study of the B B ^*/D D ^* bound states in a Bethe-Salpeter approach,'' Phys

    J. He, ``Study of the B B ^*/D D ^* bound states in a Bethe-Salpeter approach,'' Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) no.7, 076008

    2014

  21. [29]

    Z. M. Ding, H. Y. Jiang and J. He, ``Molecular states from D^ (*) D ^ (*) /B^ (*) B ^ (*) and D^ (*) D^ (*) / B ^ (*) B ^ (*) interactions,'' Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) no.12, 1179

    2020

  22. [30]

    E. Oset, W. H. Liang, M. Bayar, J. J. Xie, L. R. Dai, M. Albaladejo, M. Nielsen, T. Sekihara, F. Navarra and L. Roca, et al. ``Weak decays of heavy hadrons into dynamically generated resonances,'' Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 25 (2016), 1630001

    2016

  23. [31]

    Braaten, M

    E. Braaten, M. Kusunoki and S. Nussinov, ``Production of the X(3870) in B meson decay by the coalescence of charm mesons,'' Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004), 162001

    2004

  24. [32]

    Huang, J

    Y. Huang, J. X. Lu, J. J. Xie and L. S. Geng, ``Strong decays of D ^ * K^ * molecules and the newly observed X_ 0,1 states,'' Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) no.10, 973

    2020

  25. [33]

    L. R. Dai, R. Molina and E. Oset, ``Looking for the exotic X0(2866) and its JP=1+ partner in the B 0 D(*)+K-K(*)0 reactions,'' Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) no.9, 096022

    2022

  26. [34]

    Bando, T

    M. Bando, T. Kugo, S. Uehara, K. Yamawaki and T. Yanagida, ``Is rho Meson a Dynamical Gauge Boson of Hidden Local Symmetry?,'' Phys. Rev. Lett. 54 (1985), 1215

    1985

  27. [35]

    Bando, T

    M. Bando, T. Kugo and K. Yamawaki, ``Nonlinear Realization and Hidden Local Symmetries,'' Phys. Rept. 164 (1988), 217-314

    1988

  28. [36]

    Nagahiro, L

    H. Nagahiro, L. Roca, A. Hosaka and E. Oset, ``Hidden gauge formalism for the radiative decays of axial-vector mesons,'' Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009), 014015 [arXiv:0809.0943 [hep-ph]]

    2009 arXiv

  29. [37]

    H. Y. Cheng, C. Y. Cheung, G. L. Lin, Y. C. Lin, T. M. Yan and H. L. Yu, ``Chiral Lagrangians for radiative decays of heavy hadrons,'' Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993), 1030-1042

    1993

  30. [38]

    T. M. Yan, H. Y. Cheng, C. Y. Cheung, G. L. Lin, Y. C. Lin and H. L. Yu, ``Heavy quark symmetry and chiral dynamics,'' Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992), 1148-1164

    1992

  31. [39]

    M. B. Wise, ``Chiral perturbation theory for hadrons containing a heavy quark,'' Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) no.7, R2188

    1992

  32. [40]

    Burdman and J

    G. Burdman and J. F. Donoghue, ``Union of chiral and heavy quark symmetries,'' Phys. Lett. B 280 (1992), 287-291

    1992

  33. [41]

    Casalbuoni, A

    R. Casalbuoni, A. Deandrea, N. Di Bartolomeo, R. Gatto, F. Feruglio and G. Nardulli, ``Phenomenology of heavy meson chiral Lagrangians,'' Phys. Rept. 281 (1997), 145-238

    1997

  34. [42]

    A. F. Falk and M. E. Luke, ``Strong decays of excited heavy mesons in chiral perturbation theory,'' Phys. Lett. B 292 (1992), 119-127

    1992

  35. [43]

    Isola, M

    C. Isola, M. Ladisa, G. Nardulli and P. Santorelli, ``Charming penguins in B --- > K* pi, K(rho, omega, phi) decays,'' Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003), 114001

    2003

  36. [44]

    R. Chen, Z. F. Sun, X. Liu and S. L. Zhu, ``Strong LHCb evidence supporting the existence of the hidden-charm molecular pentaquarks,'' Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) no.1, 011502

    2019

  37. [45]

    Z. m. Ding and J. He, ``Combined analysis on nature of X(3960) , _ c0 (3930) , and X_0(4140) ,'' Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023) no.9, 806

    2023

  38. [46]

    Y. s. Oh, T. Song and S. H. Lee, ``J / psi absorption by pi and rho mesons in meson exchange model with anomalous parity interactions,'' Phys. Rev. C 63 (2001), 034901

    2001

  39. [47]

    He, ``The Z_c(3900) as a resonance from the D D ^* interaction,'' Phys

    J. He, ``The Z_c(3900) as a resonance from the D D ^* interaction,'' Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) no.3, 034004

    2015

  40. [48]

    He and D

    J. He and D. Y. Chen, `` Z_c(3900)/Z_c(3885) as a virtual state from J/ - D ^*D interaction,'' Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) no.2, 94

    2018

  41. [49]

    He, ``Internal structures of the nucleon resonances N(1875) and N(2120),'' Phys

    J. He, ``Internal structures of the nucleon resonances N(1875) and N(2120),'' Phys. Rev. C 91 (2015) no.1, 018201

    2015

  42. [50]

    He, ``Nucleon resonances N(1875) and N(2100) as strange partners of LHCb pentaquarks,'' Phys

    J. He, ``Nucleon resonances N(1875) and N(2100) as strange partners of LHCb pentaquarks,'' Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) no.7, 074031

    2017

  43. [51]

    He, `` D ^*_c and D ^* _c interactions and the LHCb hidden-charmed pentaquarks,'' Phys

    J. He, `` D ^*_c and D ^* _c interactions and the LHCb hidden-charmed pentaquarks,'' Phys. Lett. B 753 (2016), 547-551

    2016

  44. [52]

    He, ``Study of P_c(4457) , P_c(4440) , and P_c(4312) in a quasipotential Bethe-Salpeter equation approach,'' Eur

    J. He, ``Study of P_c(4457) , P_c(4440) , and P_c(4312) in a quasipotential Bethe-Salpeter equation approach,'' Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) no.5, 393

    2019

  45. [53]

    Gross and A

    F. Gross and A. Stadler, ``Covariant spectator theory of np scattering: Phase shifts obtained from precision fits to data below 350-MeV,'' Phys. Rev. C 78 (2008), 014005

    2008

  46. [54]

    Navas et al

    S. Navas et al. [Particle Data Group], ``Review of particle physics,'' Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) no.3, 030001

    2024

  47. [55]

    Aushev et al

    T. Aushev et al. [Belle], ``Study of the B X(3872)( D^ *0 D ^0) K decay,'' Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010), 031103

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.