REVIEW
On the difference between Fixed-Order and Contour-Improved Perturbation Theory
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
On the difference between Fixed-Order and Contour-Improved Perturbation Theory
read the original abstract
Using standard mathematical methods for asymptotic series and the large-$\beta_0$ approximation, we define a Minimum Distance between the Fixed-Order perturbative series and the Contour-Improved perturbative series in the strong coupling $\alpha_s$ for finite-energy sum rules as applied to hadronic $\tau$ decays. This distance is similar, but not identical, to the Asymptotic Separation of Hoang and Regner, which is defined in terms of the difference of the two series after Borel resummation. Our results confirm a nonzero nonperturbative result in $\alpha_s$ for this Minimum Distance as a measure of the intrinsic difference between the two series, as well as a conflict with the Operator Product Expansion for Contour-Improved Perturbation Theory.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.