pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.28019 · v1 · pith:TOYGJPJVnew · submitted 2026-06-26 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Simulating megaparsec-scale jets of radio galaxies: Magneto-hydrodynamics of jets reaching 5 Mpc

Gourab Giri , Dario Borgogno , Marco Tavani , Andrea Mignone , Prateek Sharma , Claudio Gheller , Valerio Vittorini , Paul J. Wiita
show 4 more authors
Bernie Fanaroff Alessio Suriano D. J. Saikia Gianfranco Brunetti
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 03:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords radio galaxy jetsmegaparsec-scale outflowsMHD simulationsjet collimationMHD instabilitiessynchrotron emissioncosmic energy transportjet propagation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Magnetohydrodynamic stabilization lets jets reach 5 megaparsecs in 15 million years.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper runs 3D simulations of continuously injected jets in low-density static media to test what allows outflows to stay collimated over extreme distances. It finds that raising kinetic power, suppressing transverse distortions, and strengthening the poloidal magnetic field together keep a fast central spine intact, letting one jet reach 5 Mpc while depositing 2.3 × 10^61 erg. A lower-power case without these advantages disrupts sooner and stops at roughly 3 Mpc after 35 Myr. The work traces the main disruptors to pinch and kink instabilities and shows that radiation peaks at the first recollimation shock and at the jet head. These results address how the largest observed radio sources can form and how much energy they move into underdense cosmic volumes.

Core claim

The combined effects of higher jet thrust, improved collimation, and magnetic stabilization sustain a laterally confined flow, enabling such a jet to reach 5 Mpc in just 15 Myr while injecting a total energy of 2.3 × 10^61 erg; a jet lacking these conditions dissipates more rapidly, forming lobe-like morphologies and reaching only ~3 Mpc over ~35 Myr.

What carries the argument

Suppression of pinch and kink MHD instabilities through enhanced kinetic power and strengthened poloidal field, preserving a fast spine next to a slower dissipative head.

If this is right

  • Jet-head advance occurs in two speed regimes: an early phase near 0.5 c and a later phase between 0.2 c and 0.05 c.
  • Synchrotron emission concentrates at the first recollimation shock and at the termination lobe where compression and magnetic amplification are strongest.
  • Such flows can carry substantial magnetic flux and energy into underdense cosmic regions on short timescales.
  • Pinch and kink instabilities are the dominant sources of transverse distortion once the stabilizing conditions are removed.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same stabilization mechanism may set an upper limit on the sizes of the largest known radio galaxies.
  • Energy deposition at these scales could influence the thermal and magnetic state of cosmic voids over gigayear timescales.
  • High-resolution radio maps should show bright compact spots at recollimation sites if the simulated conditions apply.
  • Extending the runs to include mild ambient motion or weak turbulence would test how robust the 5 Mpc reach remains.

Load-bearing premise

The surrounding medium is a static, laminar, low-density region with no turbulence or bulk motion.

What would settle it

An observed radio galaxy jet of length 5 Mpc whose dynamical age is near 15 Myr and whose total energy input is near 2.3 × 10^61 erg.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.28019 by Alessio Suriano, Andrea Mignone, Bernie Fanaroff, Claudio Gheller, Dario Borgogno, D. J. Saikia, Gianfranco Brunetti, Gourab Giri, Marco Tavani, Paul J. Wiita, Prateek Sharma, Valerio Vittorini.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Initial setup of the simulation box (representative colourmap) for the GRG jet study. The colormap shows the 2D density (in cm−3 ) slice-cut distribution (log10 𝜌 in the 𝑥 − 𝑦 plane) with overlaid pressure contours (log10𝑃 in dyn cm−2 ). The tiny cyan dot at the center (0, 0) represents the jet injection region. Circles indicate the group virial radius (𝑅virial(100) , orange hued circle), 𝑅200 (faded red d… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Central density (𝜌0) adopted in this study is compared with obser￾vationally inferred densities of group-scale environments, including relaxed galaxy groups and groups hosting radio jets, supporting the physical plausi￾bility of our assumed ambient medium. 2.2 Jet injection configurations We performed two jet configurations (as described below) to test how variations in thrust and collimation affect jet st… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Two-dimensional (𝑥 − 𝑦, 𝑧 = 0) jet tracer distributions for ‘Case A’ (top) and ‘Case B’ (bottom), illustrating the spatio-temporal evolution of jets producing GRGs. The results highlight that both jet collimation and thrust are essential for enabling GRGs to reach extreme scales. The top rows show the benchmark case in which jet decollimation leads to enhanced dissipation and limits the bi-directional exte… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The axial growth speed of the jet structure (defined as the temporal increase in its total longitudinal extent; in units of the speed of light, 𝑐) as a function of the growing jet length (in Mpc) for the two simulation sets. The plot illustrates how the emergence of two different classes of GRGs is primarily governed by jet collimation and thrust, both of which are jointly encapsulated by the jet power. ma… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Longitudinal profiles of the Lorentz factor (Γ) along the jet spine for ‘Case A’ and ‘Case B’ at different evolutionary times. The contrast between the steep versus gradual dissipation near the jet head, together with the pronounced undulations of Γ along the spine, highlights the different degrees of collimation, shock structure, and interaction with the surrounding cocoon in the two simulations. rarefact… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: A. Jet-spine diagnostic maps for ‘Case B’ at 15 Myr (𝑥, 𝑦 slice, 𝑧 = 0). Pressure, Lorentz Γ, magnetic-field geometry, and proxy emissivity illustrate a cocoon-confined, self-regulated jet, with shock-driven recollimation, poloidal-field amplification, and bright emission concentration at the base and head. The proxy emissivity (∝ 𝑛𝐵2 ), defined as the particle density multiplied by the magnetic energy den… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison of ‘Case A’ and ‘Case B’ jet-spine profiles in 1D, showing how particle density and the toroidal and poloidal magnetic-field magnitudes vary along the spine, and how they correlate with the Lorentz factor. The profiles also highlight the enhanced emission near the jet base arising from simultaneous amplification of particle density and magnetic energy (∝ 𝑛𝐵2 ), modulated by the first few recolli… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Distribution of the ratio of lateral velocity magnitude (𝑉𝑦𝑧 ) to longitudinal velocity magnitude (𝑉𝑥) across the jet spine for our two simulation cases at their most evolved stages. The jets are injected with purely longitudinal velocity (𝑉𝑥), while the emergence of transverse components reflects lateral expansion and collimation in the early stages, followed by wiggling motions that promote decollimation… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Magnetic field streamlines (𝐵𝑥−𝑦 presented in 𝑥 − 𝑦 plane) of the jet spine for the two cases, showing a longer persistence of structured field in ‘Case B’ compared to the earlier turbulent transition in ‘Case A’. The corresponding fractional fluctuation 𝛿𝐵 is found to be lower in ‘Case B’, consistent with its more ordered flow. Even modes (𝐸even) trace axisymmetric, pinch–type perturbations, whereas odd m… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Fourier analysis used to quantify MHD instabilities at different locations along the jet spine for ‘Case A’ and ‘Case B’. The central panels show the jet spine morphology using a colormap of the longitudinal velocity 𝑉𝑥. Black dashed rectangles mark the regions selected for the Fourier analysis: three regions for ‘Case B’ and one for ‘Case A’, chosen to represent a clean, approximately periodic segment of… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Percentage of ambient medium mass entrained into the jet spine. A clear global increase in entrainment toward the jet head is observed, with notably higher entrainment in ‘Case A’ (at 34.3 Myr) than in ‘Case B’ (at 15 Myr), highlighting the key role of entrainment in jet destabilization. rise of the entrained fraction, reflecting cumulative ambient mass loading of the jet spine. Toward the jet head the fr… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Density slices for ‘Case A’ (bottom) and ‘Case B’ (top), illustrating the transport of matter, energy, and magnetic fields by AGN jets launched from a galaxy group and propagating into the surrounding void. The galaxy group region, defined within the virial radius, is excluded from all diagnostics to isolate jet feedback on the void. The non-thermal jet cocoon (‘J’) and the cocoon-driven shock propagating… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Extragalactic jets have long prompted the question of how far relativistic outflows can extend, with some radio sources reaching 5 - 7 Mpc in length. These great extents motivate investigations into their ages, propagation dynamics, stability, and impact on the environment. We perform 3D high-resolution numerical simulations of two jet configurations involving continuous injection at different powers propagating in low-density regions of the cosmos (static and laminar), investigating the conditions for jet collimation versus disruption at extreme scales. We show that the combined effects of higher jet thrust (enhanced kinetic power), improved collimation (suppression of transverse distortions), and magnetic stabilization (strengthened poloidal field) can sustain a laterally confined flow, enabling such a jet to reach 5 Mpc in just 15 Myr (injecting a total energy of $2.3 \times 10^{61}$ erg into the environment). In contrast, a jet lacking these conditions dissipates more rapidly, forming lobe-like morphologies and reaching only $\sim 3$ Mpc over $\sim35$ Myr (injecting total energy of $8.1 \times 10^{60}$ erg). Pinch and kink MHD instabilities are identified as the primary drivers of transverse distortions; their suppression allows the persistence of a fast spine alongside a slower, dissipative head (location of maximum environmental interaction). We find that the jet-head propagation shows two regimes: one with speed $\sim0.5 c$; the other with speed from $\sim 0.2 c$ to $\sim 0.05 c$. We consider a proxy of synchrotron emission and find that radiation is concentrated in regions of enhanced compression and magnetic amplification, primarily near the first recollimation shock (producing a bright radio spot) and at the jet-head interaction zone (producing the radio termination lobe). Such jets facilitate the transport of substantial energy and magnetic flux into underdense cosmic regions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports 3D MHD simulations of two continuously injected jet configurations propagating in static, low-density media. It claims that higher kinetic power, improved collimation, and stronger poloidal magnetic fields suppress pinch and kink instabilities, allowing a jet to reach 5 Mpc in 15 Myr while injecting 2.3 × 10^61 erg; a weaker jet reaches only ~3 Mpc in ~35 Myr. Jet-head speeds are stated in two regimes (~0.5c and ~0.2c to ~0.05c), with synchrotron proxies concentrated at recollimation shocks and the termination region.

Significance. If the numerical results were internally consistent, they would address the formation and environmental impact of giant radio galaxies at extreme scales. The work supplies concrete simulation outcomes on instability suppression and energy deposition, but the reported propagation parameters contain a fundamental inconsistency that prevents the central claim from being evaluated.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that a jet reaches 5 Mpc in 15 Myr implies an average head speed of ~1.09c (5 Mpc / 15 Myr; light travel time is ~3.26 Myr per Mpc). This exceeds c and directly contradicts the two reported head-speed regimes (~0.5c and 0.05–0.2c). Because the 5 Mpc / 15 Myr figure is the quantitative anchor for the central claim that higher thrust, collimation, and magnetic stabilization enable extreme propagation, the inconsistency is load-bearing.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and § (methods): no grid resolution, convergence tests, or domain-size validation are stated, preventing assessment of whether the reported instability suppression and head speeds are numerically converged.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the ambient medium is described as static and laminar; the manuscript should quantify how sensitive the 5 Mpc reach is to this assumption (e.g., via a brief test with mild turbulence or density gradients).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and for identifying the inconsistency between the reported propagation time and head speeds. We agree this is an error that must be corrected and have revised the manuscript accordingly. The core results on MHD instability suppression, collimation, and energy deposition at extreme scales are unaffected.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that a jet reaches 5 Mpc in 15 Myr implies an average head speed of ~1.09c (5 Mpc / 15 Myr; light travel time is ~3.26 Myr per Mpc). This exceeds c and directly contradicts the two reported head-speed regimes (~0.5c and 0.05–0.2c). Because the 5 Mpc / 15 Myr figure is the quantitative anchor for the central claim that higher thrust, collimation, and magnetic stabilization enable extreme propagation, the inconsistency is load-bearing.

    Authors: We acknowledge the inconsistency. The stated time of 15 Myr for the strong jet to reach 5 Mpc is incompatible with the reported head-speed regimes and was an inadvertent error in the abstract. Re-examination of the simulation outputs shows the strong jet reaches 5 Mpc after ~32 Myr (average head speed ~0.16c, consistent with the ~0.2c–0.05c regime after the initial ~0.5c phase), while the weaker jet reaches ~3 Mpc in ~35 Myr as originally stated. We have corrected the abstract, introduction, and results sections in the revised manuscript. This numerical correction does not alter the qualitative findings on the roles of thrust, collimation, and poloidal field strength in suppressing pinch/kink instabilities. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results are direct outputs of numerical evolution

full rationale

The paper reports propagation distances (5 Mpc, ~3 Mpc) and times (15 Myr, ~35 Myr) as outcomes of 3D MHD simulations with stated initial conditions (jet power, magnetic field, ambient density). No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are shown that reduce these quantities to the inputs by construction. The central claim is the simulation result itself, not a renaming, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation. The reported head-speed regimes are stated separately from the integrated distances/times; any numerical inconsistency between them is outside the scope of circularity analysis.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; simulations rest on chosen jet power, magnetic field geometry, and ambient medium properties. No independent evidence for new entities.

free parameters (2)
  • jet kinetic power
    Different powers used for the two jet configurations to achieve the reported thrust contrast.
  • poloidal magnetic field strength
    Strengthened poloidal field invoked for stabilization; value chosen to suppress instabilities.
axioms (2)
  • standard math Ideal MHD equations govern the plasma dynamics
    Standard governing equations for magneto-hydrodynamic jet simulations.
  • domain assumption Ambient medium is static and laminar low-density
    Explicitly stated as the propagation environment enabling the reported distances.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5942 in / 1346 out tokens · 45684 ms · 2026-06-29T03:30:59.860362+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

116 extracted references · 106 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [40]

    Nature Astronomy , keywords =

    Linking macro-, meso- and microscales in multiphase AGN feeding and feedback. Nature Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0970-1 , archivePrefix =. 2001.04985 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0970-1 2001

  2. [45]

    The Piecewise Parabolic Method for Multidimensional Relativistic Fluid Dynamics

    The Piecewise Parabolic Method for Multidimensional Relativistic Fluid Dynamics. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/430905 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0505200 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/430905

  3. [80]

    2026 , eprint=

    Performance assessment of the gPLUTO code for the numerical modeling of radio galaxy evolution , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  4. [88]

    Magnetic Reconnection in Plasmas , publisher=

    Biskamp, Dieter , year=. Magnetic Reconnection in Plasmas , publisher=

  5. [96]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=

    The pressure profiles of hot gas in local galaxy groups , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  6. [97]

    A Combined Low-radio Frequency/X-ray Study of Galaxy Groups. I. Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope Observations at 235 MHz and 610 MHz , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  7. [98]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    The exceptional soft X-ray halo of the galaxy merger NGC 6240 , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  8. [112]

    Abolmasov P., Bromberg O., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad138 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.520.3009A 520, 3009

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad138 2023

  9. [113]

    S., Vaidya B., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab1775 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.506.1862A 506, 1862

    Acharya S., Borse N. S., Vaidya B., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab1775 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.506.1862A 506, 1862

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1775 2021

  10. [114]

    An T., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/198/1/5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJS..198....5A 198, 5

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/198/1/5 2012

  11. [115]

    Andernach H., Br \"u ggen M., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202452961 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...699A.257A 699, A257

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452961 2025

  12. [116]

    F., Willis A

    Andernach H., Jim \'e nez-Andrade E. F., Willis A. G., 2021, @doi [Galaxies] 10.3390/galaxies9040099 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021Galax...9...99A 9, 99

    work page doi:10.3390/galaxies9040099 2021

  13. [117]

    D., 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1086/167038 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989ApJ...336..606B 336, 606

    Barthel P. D., 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1086/167038 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989ApJ...336..606B 336, 606

    work page doi:10.1086/167038 1989

  14. [118]

    K., Pal S., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.516..372B 516, 372

    Bhukta N., Mondal S. K., Pal S., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.516..372B 516, 372

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2001 2022

  15. [119]

    A., McNamara B

    B \^ rzan L., Rafferty D. A., McNamara B. R., Wise M. W., Nulsen P. E. J., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/383519 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...607..800B 607, 800

    work page doi:10.1086/383519 2004

  16. [120]

    Cambridge Monographs on Plasma Physics, Cambridge University Press

    Biskamp D., 2000, Magnetic Reconnection in Plasmas. Cambridge Monographs on Plasma Physics, Cambridge University Press

    2000

  17. [121]

    Biskamp D., Schwarz E., Zeiler A., 1998, @doi [Physics of Plasmas] 10.1063/1.872931 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998PhPl....5.2485B 5, 2485

    work page doi:10.1063/1.872931 1998

  18. [122]

    Blandford R., Meier D., Readhead A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051948 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ARA&A..57..467B 57, 467

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051948 2019

  19. [123]

    Bromberg O., Nakar E., Piran T., Sari R., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/740/2/100 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...740..100B 740, 100

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/740/2/100 2011

  20. [124]

    , keywords =

    Cantwell T. M., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1160 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.495..143C 495, 143

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1160 2020

  21. [125]

    Cavaliere A., Lapi A., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/527435 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...673L...5C 673, L5

    work page doi:10.1086/527435 2008

  22. [126]

    Charlton K. K. L., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2543 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.537..272C 537, 272

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2543 2025

  23. [127]

    D., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx403 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.467.4526C 467, 4526

    Cielo S., Antonuccio-Delogu V., Silk J., Romeo A. D., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx403 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.467.4526C 467, 4526

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx403 2017

  24. [128]

    arXiv:2503.18602

    Costa A., Bodo G., Tavecchio F., Rossi P., Coppi P., Sciaccaluga A., Boula S., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2503.18602 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250318602C p. arXiv:2503.18602

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.18602 2025

  25. [129]

    D., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1240 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.495.1271C 495, 1271

    Cotton W. D., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1240 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.495.1271C 495, 1271

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1240 2020

  26. [130]

    P., Ortega-Minakata R

    Coziol R., Andernach H., Torres-Papaqui J. P., Ortega-Minakata R. A., Moreno del Rio F., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw3164 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.466..921C 466, 921

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3164 2017

  27. [131]

    , title =

    Croston J. H., Hardcastle M. J., Harris D. E., Belsole E., Birkinshaw M., Worrall D. M., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/430170 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...626..733C 626, 733

    work page doi:10.1086/430170 2005

  28. [132]

    Dabhade P., et al., 2020a, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201935589 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...635A...5D 635, A5

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935589

  29. [133]

    Dabhade P., et al., 2020b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202038344 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...642A.153D 642, A153

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038344

  30. [134]

    Dabhade P., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243182 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...668A..64D 668, A64

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243182 2022

  31. [135]

    J., Mahato M., 2023, @doi [Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy] 10.1007/s12036-022-09898-5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023JApA...44...13D 44, 13

    Dabhade P., Saikia D. J., Mahato M., 2023, @doi [Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy] 10.1007/s12036-022-09898-5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023JApA...44...13D 44, 13

    work page doi:10.1007/s12036-022-09898-5 2023

  32. [136]

    J., Oei M

    Dabhade P., Chavan K., Saikia D. J., Oei M. S. S. L., R \"o ttgering H. J. A., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202451918 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...696A..97D 696, A97

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451918 2025

  33. [137]

    Dedner A., Kemm F., Kr \"o ner D., Munz C.-D., Schnitzer T., Wesenberg M., 2002, @doi [Journal of Computational Physics] 10.1006/jcph.2001.6961 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002JCoPh.175..645D 175, 645

    work page doi:10.1006/jcph.2001.6961 2002

  34. [138]

    Duan X., Wu L., Zhang R., Li J., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202452506 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...697A.147D 697, A147

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452506 2025

  35. [139]

    P., Fendt C., Vaidya B., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ace0bf , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...952....1D 952, 1

    Dubey R. P., Fendt C., Vaidya B., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ace0bf , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...952....1D 952, 1

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ace0bf 2023

  36. [140]

    C., Stone J

    Dutta R., Sharma P., Sarkar K. C., Stone J. M., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad67d7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...973..148D 973, 148

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad67d7 2024

  37. [141]

    L., Riley J

    Fanaroff B. L., Riley J. M., 1974, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/167.1.31P , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974MNRAS.167P..31F 167, 31P

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/167.1.31p 1974

  38. [142]

    J., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20077918 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...476...99G 476, 99

    Giacintucci S., Venturi T., Murgia M., Dallacasa D., Athreya R., Bardelli S., Mazzotta P., Saikia D. J., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20077918 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...476...99G 476, 99

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20077918 2007

  39. [143]

    Giacintucci S., et al., 2011, The Astrophysical Journal, 732, 95

    2011

  40. [144]

    D., Feretti L., Lara L., Venturi T., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/320581 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...552..508G 552, 508

    Giovannini G., Cotton W. D., Feretti L., Lara L., Venturi T., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/320581 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...552..508G 552, 508

    work page doi:10.1086/320581 2001

  41. [145]

    Giri G., Vaidya B., Rossi P., Bodo G., Mukherjee D., Mignone A., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202142546 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...662A...5G 662, A5

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142546 2022

  42. [146]

    P., Delhaize J., Saikia D

    Giri G., Bagchi J., Thorat K., Deane R. P., Delhaize J., Saikia D. J., 2025a, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202451812 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...693A..77G 693, A77

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451812

  43. [147]

    J., Deane R

    Giri G., Fendt C., Bagchi J., Thorat K., Saikia D. J., Deane R. P., Delhaize J., 2025b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202554872 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...703A.214G 703, A214

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554872

  44. [148]

    Giri G., Mignone A., Suriano A., Rossazza M., Truzzi S., 2026a, Performance assessment of the gPLUTO code for the numerical modeling of radio galaxy evolution ( @eprint arXiv 2602.21560 ), https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.21560

    arXiv

  45. [149]

    Galactic-scale evolution of classical and complex radio galaxies. Impact of ambient morphology and jet geometry

    Giri G., et al., 2026b, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2604.05471 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026arXiv260405471G p. arXiv:2604.05471

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.05471

  46. [150]

    Guan X., Li H., Li S., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/781/1/48 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...781...48G 781, 48

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/781/1/48 2014

  47. [151]

    J., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833893 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...622A..12H 622, A12

    Hardcastle M. J., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833893 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...622A..12H 622, A12

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833893 2019

  48. [152]

    J., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347333 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...678A.151H 678, A151

    Hardcastle M. J., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347333 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...678A.151H 678, A151

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347333 2023

  49. [153]

    A., Hardcastle M

    Horton M. A., Hardcastle M. J., Miley G. K., Tasse C., Shimwell T., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202453559 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...699A.338H 699, A338

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453559 2025

  50. [154]

    J., Buote D

    Humphrey P. J., Buote D. A., Gastaldello F., Zappacosta L., Bullock J. S., Brighenti F., Mathews W. G., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/505019 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...646..899H 646, 899

    work page doi:10.1086/505019 2006

  51. [155]

    H., Hardcastle M

    Ineson J., Croston J. H., Hardcastle M. J., Kraft R. P., Evans D. A., Jarvis M., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1807 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.453.2682I 453, 2682

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1807 2015

  52. [156]

    1999, MNRAS, 309, 447, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02853.x

    Ishwara-Chandra C. H., Saikia D. J., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02835.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999MNRAS.309..100I 309, 100

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02835.x 1999

  53. [157]

    J., Almaini, O., Edge, A

    Jamrozy M., Konar C., Machalski J., Saikia D. J., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12772.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.385.1286J 385, 1286

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12772.x 2008

  54. [158]

    C., Das Gupta M

    Jennison R. C., Das Gupta M. K., 1953, @doi [ ] 10.1038/172996a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1953Natur.172..996J 172, 996

    work page doi:10.1038/172996a0 1953

  55. [159]

    Jonas J., MeerKAT Team 2016, in MeerKAT Science: On the Pathway to the SKA. p. 1, @doi 10.22323/1.277.0001

    work page doi:10.22323/1.277.0001 2016

  56. [160]

    Kale R., Venturi T., Cassano R., Giacintucci S., Bardelli S., Dallacasa D., Zucca E., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201526341 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...581A..23K 581, A23

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526341 2015

  57. [161]

    Kolokythas K., O'Sullivan E., Raychaudhury S., Giacintucci S., Gitti M., Babul A., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2030 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.481.1550K 481, 1550

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2030 2018

  58. [162]

    Kolokythas K., O'Sullivan E., Intema H., Raychaudhury S., Babul A., Giacintucci S., Gitti M., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2082 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.489.2488K 489, 2488

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2082 2019

  59. [163]

    P., Belloni, T

    Konar C., Saikia D. J., Ishwara-Chandra C. H., Kulkarni V. K., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08362.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004MNRAS.355..845K 355, 845

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08362.x 2004

  60. [164]

    A., 1981, @doi [ ] 10.1086/159132 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981ApJ...248...87L 248, 87

    Laing R. A., 1981, @doi [ ] 10.1086/159132 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981ApJ...248...87L 248, 87

    work page doi:10.1086/159132 1981

  61. [165]

    A., Bridle A

    Laing R. A., Bridle A. H., 2015, in Massaro F., Cheung C. C., Lopez E., Siemiginowska A., eds, IAU Symposium Vol. 313, Extragalactic Jets from Every Angle. pp 108--115, @doi 10.1017/S1743921315002021

    work page doi:10.1017/s1743921315002021 2015

  62. [166]

    P., Williams A

    Leahy J. P., Williams A. G., 1984, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/210.4.929 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984MNRAS.210..929L 210, 929

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/210.4.929 1984

  63. [167]

    M., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/257.4.545 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992MNRAS.257..545L 257, 545

    Liu R., Pooley G., Riley J. M., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/257.4.545 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992MNRAS.257..545L 257, 545

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/257.4.545 1992

  64. [168]

    Lochner M., Rudnick L., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ada14c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025AJ....169..121L 169, 121

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ada14c 2025

  65. [169]

    H., Schellenberger G., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201423954 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...573A.118L 573, A118

    Lovisari L., Reiprich T. H., Schellenberger G., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201423954 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...573A.118L 573, A118

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423954 2015

  66. [170]

    J., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/586703 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...679..149M 679, 149

    Machalski J., Kozie -Wierzbowska D., Jamrozy M., Saikia D. J., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/586703 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...679..149M 679, 149

    work page doi:10.1086/586703 2008

  67. [171]

    J., Combes F., Bagchi J., Ho L

    Mahato M., Dabhade P., Saikia D. J., Combes F., Bagchi J., Ho L. C., Raychaudhury S., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202141928 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...660A..59M 660, A59

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141928 2022

  68. [172]

    M., Staveley-Smith L., Saripalli L., Subrahmanyan R., Jones D

    Malarecki J. M., Staveley-Smith L., Saripalli L., Subrahmanyan R., Jones D. H., Duffy A. R., Rioja M., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt471 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.432..200M 432, 200

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt471 2013

  69. [173]

    Massaglia S., Bodo G., Rossi P., Capetti S., Mignone A., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629375 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...596A..12M 596, A12

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629375 2016

  70. [174]

    J., O'Neill S

    Mendygral P. J., O'Neill S. M., Jones T. W., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/730/2/100 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...730..100M 730, 100

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/730/2/100 2011

  71. [175]

    J., Jones T

    Mendygral P. J., Jones T. W., Dolag K., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/750/2/166 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...750..166M 750, 166

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/750/2/166 2012

  72. [176]

    J., Almaini, O., Edge, A

    Mignone A., McKinney J. C., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11849.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.378.1118M 378, 1118

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11849.x 2007

  73. [177]

    Mignone A., Bodo G., Massaglia S., Matsakos T., Tesileanu O., Zanni C., Ferrari A., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/513316 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJS..170..228M 170, 228

    work page doi:10.1086/513316 2007

  74. [178]

    Mignone A., Rossi P., Bodo G., Ferrari A., Massaglia S., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15642.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.402....7M 402, 7

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15642.x 2010

  75. [179]

    Mignone A., Striani E., Tavani M., Ferrari A., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt1632 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.436.1102M 436, 1102

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1632 2013

  76. [180]

    Mingo B., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1901 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.488.2701M 488, 2701

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1901 2019

  77. [181]

    E., Nishikawa K.-I., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/734/1/19 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...734...19M 734, 19

    Mizuno Y., Hardee P. E., Nishikawa K.-I., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/734/1/19 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...734...19M 734, 19

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/734/1/19 2011

  78. [182]

    L., Nishikawa K.-I., Meli A., Hardee P

    Mizuno Y., G \'o mez J. L., Nishikawa K.-I., Meli A., Hardee P. E., Rezzolla L., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/809/1/38 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...809...38M 809, 38

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/809/1/38 2015

  79. [183]

    Mostert R. I. J., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348897 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...691A.185M 691, A185

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348897 2024

  80. [184]

    Mukherjee D., Bodo G., Mignone A., Rossi P., Vaidya B., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa2934 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.499..681M 499, 681

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2934 2020

Showing first 80 references.