Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 7 minor 1 cited by

A large digital-twin dataset aligns vision, LiDAR, motion, CSI, and radar for low-altitude UAV sensing and communication under shared trajectories.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-11 23:40 UTC pith:TPLZ5QGE

load-bearing objection Solid, usable low-altitude multimodal ISAC dataset release with real configurability and public code/data; main limit is synthetic RF fidelity without hardware validation, already scoped honestly. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.03826 v1 pith:TPLZ5QGE submitted 2026-07-04 eess.SP

LAMBDA: A Low-Altitude Multimodal Base Dataset for UAV Sensing and Communication

Lin Zhou , Peichuan Rao , Chenshuo Zhang , Jianhua Mo , Shu Sun , Zhiyong Chen , Meixia Tao This is my paper
classification eess.SP
keywords low-altitude UAVintegrated sensing and communicationmultimodal datasetdigital twinchannel state informationradar synthesisbeam predictionUAV localization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Low-altitude UAV networks need communication and sensing to work together, but progress is limited by scarce data that put wireless channels, cameras, LiDAR, motion, and weather on the same trajectories and clocks. This paper introduces LAMBDA, a synthetic multimodal base dataset built from high-fidelity digital-twin scenes so that every frame shares geometry, pose, and time. It releases synchronized RGB, depth, LiDAR, IMU, UAV poses, path-level CSI, and radar-synthesis resources across urban, suburban, and campus settings, multi-UAV and multi-base-station layouts, night, and rain, snow, and fog. CSI and radar are stored so users can choose antenna arrays, bandwidths, subcarrier spacing, chirps, and plane-wave or spherical-wave synthesis. Quality checks and two learning demos—RGB-aided beam prediction and RGB–LiDAR localization—are offered to show that the records are complete, aligned, and usable for integrated sensing and communication research.

Core claim

LAMBDA is a high-fidelity, modality-diverse, scenario-rich, and RF-configurable low-altitude multimodal base dataset of 2.04 TB and 517,939 aligned frames whose synchronized visual, geometric, inertial, CSI, and radar records are complete, physically plausible, and directly consumable by UAV ISAC pipelines, as supported by generation-time quality control, weather and multimodal visualizations, and two learning use cases.

What carries the argument

The digital-twin generation pipeline: UE5/Cosys-AirSim for frame-indexed UAV motion and visual/LiDAR/IMU streams; Blender mesh conversion with refined electromagnetic materials into Sionna RT path-level CSI; CADFEKO UAV RCS for configurable FMCW radar synthesis; offline alignment in a shared right-handed world frame by common frame index and realized pose.

Load-bearing premise

That this offline stack of rendering, material-aware ray tracing, UAV radar-cross-section models, and modality-specific weather degradations is realistic and consistent enough that algorithms trained on it can transfer toward real low-altitude base-station-to-UAV systems without matching physical measurements in the same geometries.

What would settle it

Measure real BS–UAV CSI, radar returns, and camera/LiDAR under matched trajectories, weather, and antenna setups in one of the released scenes and check whether synthetic multipath, beam labels, and localization geometry agree closely enough that models trained on LAMBDA retain accuracy when fine-tuned or tested on the hardware data.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 7 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces LAMBDA, a large synthetic digital-twin dataset (2.04 TB, 517,939 aligned frames) for low-altitude UAV integrated sensing and communication (ISAC). It provides synchronized RGB, depth, LiDAR, IMU, UAV poses, path-level CSI, and configurable FMCW radar-synthesis resources under shared frame indices and a unified right-handed world coordinate system. Generation combines UE5/Cosys-AirSim, Blender mesh conversion, refined electromagnetic materials, Sionna RT multipath, and CADFEKO UAV RCS, with modality-specific weather models. Coverage includes urban/suburban/campus scenes, multi-UAV/multi-BS layouts, night, and rain/snow/fog. Reliability is assessed via generation-time quality control, weather and multimodal visualizations, and two usability experiments: RGB-aided 60 GHz beam prediction (with few-shot transfer to DeepSense Scenario 23) and RGB–LiDAR 3D UAV localization across scenes.

Significance. Low-altitude UAV ISAC research has been constrained by the lack of synchronized multimodal records that jointly capture RF propagation, vision, geometry, motion, and weather under common trajectories. LAMBDA is a substantial resource contribution: it is larger and more modality-complete for infrastructure-side low-altitude observation than prior wireless or synthetic-city datasets (Table 1), stores configurable path-level CSI rather than fixed tensors, and releases public data (Science Data Bank DOI) plus code for CSI postprocessing and radar synthesis. The offline pose-centered alignment protocol, multi-stage QC, and non-circular usability checks—including backbone pretraining transfer to a real multimodal dataset—are concrete strengths that make the resource immediately usable for benchmarking and pretraining.

major comments (2)
  1. Abstract and Background & Summary repeatedly characterize LAMBDA as offering “high physical and visual fidelity,” while Technical Validation assesses reliability mainly via archive/QC checks, qualitative visualizations (Figs. 6–8), and two learning use cases. There is no quantitative comparison of synthetic RF statistics (e.g., path-loss vs range, delay-spread or angular-spread distributions, weather attenuation) against published low-altitude measurement campaigns or standard models. For a dataset paper this is not an internal inconsistency, but the fidelity claim is load-bearing for intended algorithm transfer toward real BS–UAV systems. A short Limitations subsection should state that RF/radar realism is model-based (Sionna RT + ITU/Gunn–East + CADFEKO RCS) without same-geometry hardware validation, and clarify that LAMBDA is positioned as a synthetic base/pretraining resource rather
  2. Technical Validation, Use Case 1 (RGB-aided beam prediction; Fig. 9): The transfer experiment to DeepSense Scenario 23 is the strongest external check, yet the text only states that LAMBDA Open Ground–pretrained models “converge effectively” and that solid lines outperform ImageNet-only dashed lines. Numerical Top-1/Top-3/Top-5 accuracies (or deltas) at the reported training ratios (N=64…1024) should be given in the main text or a small table so the magnitude of the transfer benefit is assessable without sole reliance on the figure. The protocol (reinitialized heads, fair comparison) is sound; the reporting gap is what needs fixing.
minor comments (7)
  1. Abstract body text contains a spacing/formatting glitch (“alow-altitudemultimodalbase dataset”); fix for production.
  2. Use Case 2 heading and related text use “UA V” with an internal space; normalize to “UAV” throughout.
  3. Table 1 is useful but dense; a one-sentence takeaway in the caption (what unique joint coverage LAMBDA adds vs Multimodal-NF / PML-CellularEye / SynthSoM) would help readers.
  4. Methods, Trajectory Control: free parameters of z-traj (L, Δℓ, Δh, v) and mobility clip limits are stated; briefly note whether these presets are fixed for all released trajectories or user-reconfigurable in the generator scripts.
  5. Fig. 6 LiDAR panels use red/blue overlays for missing/weather-induced points—state this encoding explicitly in the figure caption for accessibility.
  6. Data Records / Usage Notes: path-level CSI fields are listed; a short example of reconstructing an OFDM channel tensor (array size, SCS, bandwidth) in the code README or Usage Notes would lower the barrier for communication users.
  7. References include several 2025–2026 arXiv/preprint entries; ensure final citation metadata (venue, DOI) is updated at proof stage where available.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: dataset release with independent QC, external transfer check, and non-tautological usability experiments.

full rationale

LAMBDA is a synthetic multimodal dataset paper, not a first-principles derivation. Its load-bearing claims are that the digital-twin pipeline produces synchronized, complete, and usable low-altitude ISAC records. Those claims are supported by generation-time integrity checks, cross-modal visualizations, public code/DOI, and two learning use cases that do not reduce to their inputs by construction: (1) RGB-aided beam prediction pretrains a ResNet-50 backbone on LAMBDA Open Ground then few-shot adapts to the external real DeepSense Scenario 23 with reinitialized classification heads, so transfer accuracy is not forced by the LAMBDA labels; (2) RGB–LiDAR localization trains on Block 1 and tests on held-out Square 1, with Success@1m compared against an explicit geometric upper bound that uses ground-truth pixels rather than the model’s own predictions. Path-level CSI and radar synthesis are configurable post-processing of stored multipath geometry and CADFEKO RCS, not fitted targets renamed as predictions. Self-citations are limited to the dataset deposit and standard tooling (UE5, AirSim, Sionna, etc.) and do not import uniqueness theorems or ansatzes that force the central result. No self-definitional loop, fitted-input-as-prediction, or self-citation chain is present.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a synthetic dataset paper, the central claim rests on simulator fidelity and modeling choices rather than free parameters fitted to a scientific constant. Load-bearing premises are domain assumptions about ray tracing, materials, weather degradation models, and pose-based offline alignment. No new physical entities are postulated; LAMBDA is an engineered data product.

free parameters (4)
  • z-traj geometric parameters (L, Δℓ, Δh, v)
    Hand-chosen scan geometry (L=50 m, lane spacing 10 m, altitude step 10 m, speed 5 m/s) that defines altitude-layer coverage; not fitted to external data but shapes the released trajectories.
  • random-trajectory mobility limits
    Acceleration clips (±4 / ±6 m/s²), turn-rate limits (80°/s / 120°/s), and speed bounds (13.5 m/s horizontal, 6 m/s vertical) chosen as low/high mobility presets.
  • reference FMCW radar preset
    77 GHz, 2 GHz bandwidth, 40 µs chirp, 204.8 MHz sampling, 64 chirps, 4×4 array used as default synthesis configuration; user-overridable but defines released examples.
  • local Niagara emitter volume and spawn rates
    10×10×10 m³ local rain/snow emitters and weather-specific particle rates chosen for rendering cost vs frustum coverage.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Sionna RT multipath geometry plus frequency-dependent materials and ITU/Gunn–East atmospheric attenuation adequately represent low-altitude BS–UAV channels for algorithm research.
    Invoked throughout Wireless Channel Modeling and RF Weather Attenuation Modeling; no co-located real channel sounding is provided.
  • domain assumption Frame-indexed realized UAV poses in a unified right-handed world frame suffice for offline spatiotemporal alignment of all modalities.
    Core of Trajectory Control and Pose-based Alignment; alignment is not simultaneous multi-simulator execution.
  • domain assumption CADFEKO RCS of the AirSim UAV model, queried by attitude, is an adequate radar target model when combined with path-level CSI.
    Radar Signal Generation section; RCS is simulated, not measured on a physical airframe.
  • domain assumption Modality-specific weather degradations (Niagara, LISA, UE5 volumetric fog, Hahner fog model, ITU rain/fog) produce mutually consistent adverse-weather labels.
    Weather Configuration and Table 3; consistency is checked visually, not against field multi-sensor weather campaigns.
  • standard math Standard computer-graphics and ray-tracing mathematics (coordinate transforms, path gains/delays/angles, FMCW dechirp/FFT processing) hold as implemented.
    Background of the entire generation pipeline.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 19664 in / 3310 out tokens · 33012 ms · 2026-07-11T23:40:19.181607+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of LAMBDA: A Low-Altitude Multimodal Base Dataset for UAV Sensing and Communication." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TPLZ5QGE

@misc{pith2026260703826,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: LAMBDA: A Low-Altitude Multimodal Base Dataset for UAV Sensing and Communication},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TPLZ5QGE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.03826}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Research on low-altitude integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) requires aligned multimodal data that jointly describe wireless propagation, visual appearance, unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) motion, light detection and ranging (LiDAR) perception, and radar sensing under common trajectories and timestamps. To address this need, a low-altitude multimodal base dataset, named LAMBDA, is introduced. LAMBDA is characterized by high fidelity, modality diversity, scenario richness, and configuration flexibility. It is generated through a high-fidelity digital-twin pipeline with detailed scene geometry, refined material assignment, and electromagnetic modeling of UAVs. LAMBDA provides synchronized RGB images, depth maps, LiDAR point clouds, inertial measurement unit states, UAV poses, channel state information (CSI), and radar-synthesis resources across matched low-altitude operating conditions, shared coordinate systems, and synchronized frame indices. The dataset covers urban, suburban, and campus scenes, multi-UAV/multi-base-station settings, nighttime conditions, and sunny, rainy, snowy, and foggy weather variations. Its CSI and radar resources support user-defined antenna-array sizes, bandwidths, subcarrier spacings, chirp parameters, and plane-wave or spherical-wavefront channel synthesis. The reliability and usability of LAMBDA are assessed through quality control, weather and multimodal visualization, and two UAV ISAC-related use cases: RGB-aided beam prediction and RGB-LiDAR-based UAV localization.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.03826 by Chenshuo Zhang, Jianhua Mo, Lin Zhou, Meixia Tao, Peichuan Rao, Shu Sun, Zhiyong Chen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview of the LAMBDA digital-twin generation pipeline. LiDAR point clouds, IMU states, and ground-truth poses. In the RF channel and radar branch, the same UE5 assets are exported through Blender, converted into radio-scene meshes, assigned elec￾tromagnetic material properties, and imported into Sionna RT for ray tracing and CSI generation. The radar synthesis module further combines the Sionna RT multip… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Regions included in the LAMBDA dataset [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Material-assignment comparison for the LAMBDA Square 2 scene. −50 −40 −30 −20 −10 x (m) 140 150 160 170 180 y (m) 90 100 110 120 z (m) −60 −30 0 30 60 x (m) −60 −30 0 30 60 y (m) 0 20 40 60 Low mobility High mobility z (m) (a) Realized z-traj segments (b) Random dynamic trajectories [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Example trajectories in LAMBDA. key that links visual, geometric, inertial, wireless, and radar-synthesis records describing the same UAV state in the same world coordinate system. The simulation adopts a global frame interval of 1/60 s for temporal alignment. In the data￾collection loop, the simulator is paused before each acquisition so that all recorded sensor streams correspond to the same instantaneou… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Data directory hierarchy and files of the LAMBDA dataset [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Weather visualization examples from the LAMBDA Suburb 1 scene. (a) RGB, sunny (b) RGB, night [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Sunny and night visualization example from the LAMBDA Mountain 1 scene. These checks complement the frame-level timestamp checks by showing that synchronized sensing streams remain visually and geometrically coherent across weather settings. Synchronized Multimodal Visualization. 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Synchronized multimodal sample from the LAMBDA Block 1 scene [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Algorithm workflow and results for Use Case 1: RGB-aided beam prediction. ically, the ResNet-50 backbone initialized with ImageNet weights is trained on the LAMBDA Open Ground scene. This source model is trained on 2,639 samples and validated on 293 held￾out samples. For the external transfer check on DeepSense Scenario 23, this backbone pretrained on LAMBDA Open Ground is compared with a control model tha… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Algorithm workflow and results for Use Case 2: RGB–LiDAR-based UAV localization. dataset are physically consistent and can serve as valid supervisory signals for downstream tasks. These results support the intended use of LAMBDA as a low-altitude multimodal pretraining dataset. Use Case 2: RGB–LiDAR-based UAV Localization. The second use case evaluates cross￾scene 3D UAV localization using synchronized BS… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. BDFlow-3DRM: Height-Coherent 3D Radio Map Construction via Bi-Dynamical Flow Matching

    eess.SP 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A bi-dynamical flow-matching model constructs height-coherent 3D radio maps from environment and transceiver heights, improving accuracy and height generalization while cutting inference cost versus diffusion baselines.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Mohammad Mozaffari, Walid Saad, Mehdi Bennis, Young-Han Nam, and M´ erouane Debbah. A tutorial on UAVs for wireless networks: Applications, challenges, and open problems.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 21(3):2334–2360, 2019.https://doi.org/10.1109/ COMST.2019.2902862

    arXiv 2019

  2. [2]

    Low-altitude economy: next frontier in spatial exploration and economic development.National Science Review, 13(12):nwag208, June 2026.https: //doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwag208

    Heung-Yeung Shum and Shipeng Li. Low-altitude economy: next frontier in spatial exploration and economic development.National Science Review, 13(12):nwag208, June 2026.https: //doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwag208

    work page doi:10.1093/nsr/nwag208 2026

  3. [3]

    Eldar, and Ste- fano Buzzi

    Fan Liu, Yuanhao Cui, Christos Masouros, Jie Xu, Tony Xiao Han, Yonina C. Eldar, and Ste- fano Buzzi. Integrated sensing and communications: Towards dual-functional wireless networks for 6G and beyond.IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 40(6):1728–1767, 2022.https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2022.3156632

    work page doi:10.1109/jsac.2022.3156632 2022

  4. [4]

    Yihang Jiang, Xiaoyang Li, Guangxu Zhu, Hang Li, Jing Deng, Kaifeng Han, Chao Shen, Qingjiang Shi, and Rui Zhang. Integrated sensing and communication for low altitude economy: Opportunities and challenges.IEEE Communications Magazine, 63(12):72–78, 2025.https: //doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.001.2400685

    work page doi:10.1109/mcom.001.2400685 2025

  5. [5]

    An overview of cellular ISAC for low-altitude UAV: New opportunities and challenges.IEEE Communications Magazine, 63(12):88–95, 2025.https://doi.org/10

    Yuxuan Song, Yong Zeng, Yuhang Yang, Zixiang Ren, Gaoyuan Cheng, Xiaoli Xu, Jie Xu, Shi Jin, and Rui Zhang. An overview of cellular ISAC for low-altitude UAV: New opportunities and challenges.IEEE Communications Magazine, 63(12):88–95, 2025.https://doi.org/10. 1109/MCOM.002.2400742

    2025

  6. [6]

    Framework and overall objectives of the future development of IMT for 2030 and beyond

    ITU-R. Framework and overall objectives of the future development of IMT for 2030 and beyond. Recommendation ITU-R M.2160-0, International Telecommunication Union, 2023. https://www.itu.int/rec/R-REC-M.2160-0-202311-I/en

    2030

  7. [7]

    The road to 6G: Driving the next wave of connectivity—Part I [Scanning the Issue].Proceedings of the IEEE, 112(7):615–620, 2024.https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2024.3475891

    Mohamed-Slim Alouini, Emil Bj¨ ornson, Meixia Tao, and Yasamin Mostofi. The road to 6G: Driving the next wave of connectivity—Part I [Scanning the Issue].Proceedings of the IEEE, 112(7):615–620, 2024.https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2024.3475891

    work page doi:10.1109/jproc.2024.3475891 2024

  8. [8]

    Are we ready for autonomous driving? The KITTI vision benchmark suite

    Andreas Geiger, Philip Lenz, and Raquel Urtasun. Are we ready for autonomous driving? The KITTI vision benchmark suite. InProceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 3354–3361, 2012.https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR. 2012.6248074. 17

    doi:10.1109/cvpr 2012

  9. [9]

    OPV2V: An open benchmark dataset and fusion pipeline for perception with vehicle-to-vehicle commu- nication

    Runsheng Xu, Hao Xiang, Zhengzhong Tu, Xin Xia, Ming-Hsuan Yang, and Jiaqi Ma. OPV2V: An open benchmark dataset and fusion pipeline for perception with vehicle-to-vehicle commu- nication. InProceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 2583–2589, 2022.https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA46639.2022.9812038

    doi:10.1109/icra46639.2022.9812038 2022

  10. [10]

    DAIR-V2X: A large-scale dataset for vehicle- infrastructure cooperative 3D object detection

    Haibao Yu, Yizhen Luo, Mao Shu, Yiyi Huo, Zebang Yang, Yifeng Shi, Zhenglong Guo, Hanyu Li, Xing Hu, Jirui Yuan, and Zaiqing Nie. DAIR-V2X: A large-scale dataset for vehicle- infrastructure cooperative 3D object detection. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 21329–21338, 2022.https://doi.org/ 10.1109/...

    doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.02067 2022

  11. [11]

    A synthetic digital city dataset for robustness and generalisation of depth esti- mation models.Sci

    Jihao Li, Jincheng Hu, Yanjun Huang, Zheng Chen, Jingjing Jiang, Yuanjian Zhang, and Bingzhao Gao. A synthetic digital city dataset for robustness and generalisation of depth esti- mation models.Sci. Data, 11:301, 2024.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03025-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41597-024-03025-5 2024

  12. [12]

    DeepMIMO: A generic deep learning dataset for millimeter wave and mas- sive MIMO applications

    Ahmed Alkhateeb. DeepMIMO: A generic deep learning dataset for millimeter wave and mas- sive MIMO applications. InProceedings of the Information Theory and Applications Workshop, 2019.https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1902.06435

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.06435 2019

  13. [13]

    WAIR-D: Wireless AI research dataset

    Yourui Huangfu, Jian Wang, Shengchen Dai, Rong Li, Jun Wang, Chongwen Huang, and Zhaoyang Zhang. WAIR-D: Wireless AI research dataset. InProceedings of the IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China, pages 43–48, 2022

    2022

  14. [14]

    ViWi: A deep learning dataset framework for vision-aided wireless communications

    Muhammad Alrabeiah, Andrew Hredzak, Zhenhao Liu, and Ahmed Alkhateeb. ViWi: A deep learning dataset framework for vision-aided wireless communications. In2020 IEEE 91st Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2020-Spring), pages 1–5. IEEE, 2020.https: //doi.org/10.1109/VTC2020-Spring48590.2020.9128579

    doi:10.1109/vtc2020-spring48590.2020.9128579 2020

  15. [15]

    Chowdhury

    Jerry Gu, Batool Salehi, Debashri Roy, and Kaushik R. Chowdhury. Multimodality in mmWave MIMO beam selection using deep learning: Datasets and challenges.IEEE Communications Magazine, 60(11):36–41, 2022.https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.002.2200028

    work page doi:10.1109/mcom.002.2200028 2022

  16. [16]

    DeepSense 6G: A large-scale real-world multi-modal sensing and communication dataset.IEEE Communications Magazine, 61(9):122–128, 2023.https:// doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.006.2200730

    Ahmed Alkhateeb et al. DeepSense 6G: A large-scale real-world multi-modal sensing and communication dataset.IEEE Communications Magazine, 61(9):122–128, 2023.https:// doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.006.2200730

    work page doi:10.1109/mcom.006.2200730 2023

  17. [17]

    M3SC: A generic dataset for mixed multi-modal sensing and communication integration.China Communications, 20(11):13–29, 2023.https://doi.org/ 10.23919/JCC.fa.2023-0268.202311

    Xiang Cheng, Ziwei Huang, Lu Bai, Haotian Zhang, Mingran Sun, Boxun Liu, Sijiang Li, Jianan Zhang, and Minson Lee. M3SC: A generic dataset for mixed multi-modal sensing and communication integration.China Communications, 20(11):13–29, 2023.https://doi.org/ 10.23919/JCC.fa.2023-0268.202311

    work page doi:10.23919/jcc.fa.2023-0268.202311 2023

  18. [18]

    SynthSoM: A synthetic intelligent multi-modal sensing-communication dataset for synesthesia of machines (SoM).Sci

    Xiang Cheng, Ziwei Huang, Yong Yu, Lu Bai, Mingran Sun, Zengrui Han, Ruide Zhang, and Sijiang Li. SynthSoM: A synthetic intelligent multi-modal sensing-communication dataset for synesthesia of machines (SoM).Sci. Data, 12:819, 2025.https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41597-025-05065-x

    2025

  19. [19]

    DeepVerse 6G and WI-Lab dataset collection.https://www

    Wireless Intelligence Lab. DeepVerse 6G and WI-Lab dataset collection.https://www. wi-lab.net/datasets-page/, 2025. 18

    2025

  20. [20]

    Multimodal-Wireless: A large-scale dataset for sensing and communication.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.03220, 2025

    Tianhao Mao, Le Liang, Jie Yang, Hao Ye, Shi Jin, and Geoffrey Ye Li. Multimodal-Wireless: A large-scale dataset for sensing and communication.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.03220, 2025. https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.03220

    arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Multimodal-NF: A wireless dataset for near-field low-altitude sensing and communi- cations.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.28280, 2026.https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603

    Mengyuan Li, Qianfan Lu, Jiachen Tian, Hongjun Hu, Yu Han, Xiao Li, Chao-Kai Wen, and Shi Jin. Multimodal-NF: A wireless dataset for near-field low-altitude sensing and communi- cations.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.28280, 2026.https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603. 28280

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603 2026

  22. [22]

    PML-CellularEye: A multi-modal experimental dataset for 6G ISAC re- search.Science China Information Sciences, 69(6):167301, 2026.https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11432-026-4923-1

    Ziguo Zhong, Yongming Huang, Huazhou Hou, Fanfei Xu, Haisheng Feng, Shengheng Liu, and Xiaohu You. PML-CellularEye: A multi-modal experimental dataset for 6G ISAC re- search.Science China Information Sciences, 69(6):167301, 2026.https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11432-026-4923-1

    2026

  23. [23]

    Unreal Engine 5.https://www.unrealengine.com/

    Epic Games. Unreal Engine 5.https://www.unrealengine.com/

  24. [24]

    AirSim: High-fidelity visual and physical simulation for autonomous vehicles

    Shital Shah, Debadeepta Dey, Chris Lovett, and Ashish Kapoor. AirSim: High-fidelity visual and physical simulation for autonomous vehicles. InField and Service Robotics: Results of the 11th International Conference, pages 621–635. Springer, 2018.https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-319-67361-5_40

    2018

  25. [25]

    Cosys-AirSim: Extended AirSim simulation for autonomous mobility systems

    Cosys-Lab. Cosys-AirSim: Extended AirSim simulation for autonomous mobility systems. https://cosys-lab.github.io/Cosys-AirSim/

  26. [26]

    Blender.https://www.blender.org/

    Blender Foundation. Blender.https://www.blender.org/

  27. [27]

    Sionna RT: Technical report, 2025

    Fay¸ cal Ait Aoudia, Jakob Hoydis, Merlin Nimier-David, Sebastian Cammerer, and Alex Keller. Sionna RT: Technical report, 2025

    2025

  28. [28]

    Altair Feko: High-frequency electromagnetic simulation software

    Altair Engineering Inc. Altair Feko: High-frequency electromagnetic simulation software. https://altair.com/feko

  29. [29]

    Rong Li and Vesselin P

    X. Rong Li and Vesselin P. Jilkov. Survey of maneuvering target tracking. Part I: Dynamic models.IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 39(4):1333–1364, October 2003

    2003

  30. [30]

    Brinton Cooper, Mark A

    Velat Kilic, Deepti Hegde, Vishwanath Sindagi, A. Brinton Cooper, Mark A. Foster, and Vishal M. Patel. LiDAR light scattering augmentation (LISA): Physics-based simulation of adverse weather conditions for 3D object detection. InICASSP 2025 - 2025 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pages 1–5, 2025.https: //d...

    doi:10.1109/icassp49660.2025.10889253 2025

  31. [31]

    Fog simulation on real LiDAR point clouds for 3D object detection in adverse weather

    Martin Hahner, Christos Sakaridis, Dengxin Dai, and Luc Van Gool. Fog simulation on real LiDAR point clouds for 3D object detection in adverse weather. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 15263–15272, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.01500

    doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.01500 2021

  32. [32]

    LAMBDA: A low-altitude multimodal base dataset for UAV sensing and communication

    Lin Zhou, Peichuan Rao, Chenshuo Zhang, Jianhua Mo, Shu Sun, Zhiyong Chen, and Meixia Tao. LAMBDA: A low-altitude multimodal base dataset for UAV sensing and communication. Science Data Bank, 2026.https://doi.org/10.57760/sciencedb.36052. 19

    work page doi:10.57760/sciencedb.36052 2026

  33. [33]

    Specific attenuation model for rain for use in prediction methods

    ITU-R. Specific attenuation model for rain for use in prediction methods. Recommendation ITU-R P.838-3, International Telecommunication Union, 2005

    2005

  34. [34]

    Attenuation due to clouds and fog

    ITU-R. Attenuation due to clouds and fog. Recommendation ITU-R P.840-9, International Telecommunication Union, 2024

    2024

  35. [35]

    K. L. S. Gunn and T. W. R. East. The microwave properties of precipitation parti- cles.Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 80(346):522–545, 1954.https: //doi.org/10.1002/qj.49708034603

    work page doi:10.1002/qj.49708034603 1954

  36. [36]

    Charan, Ammar Hredzak, Christopher Stoddard, Mustafa Al-Sabah, Jaspreet Chourasia, and Ahmed Alkhateeb

    Gopala K. Charan, Ammar Hredzak, Christopher Stoddard, Mustafa Al-Sabah, Jaspreet Chourasia, and Ahmed Alkhateeb. Towards real-world 6G drone communication: Position and camera aided beam prediction. InProceedings of the IEEE Global Communications Con- ference (GLOBECOM), pages 2951–2956, 2022.https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOBECOM48099. 2022.10000718. Acknowle...

    doi:10.1109/globecom48099 2022