Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Safe Neurosymbolic Learning with Differentiable Symbolic Execution

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.07671 v1 pith:TQBVJP2G submitted 2022-03-15 cs.LG cs.AIcs.PL

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.PL
keywords learningsymbolicdifferentiableexecutionlossesmethodneurosymbolicoperations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the problem of learning worst-case-safe parameters for programs that use neural networks as well as symbolic, human-written code. Such neurosymbolic programs arise in many safety-critical domains. However, because they can use nondifferentiable operations, it is hard to learn their parameters using existing gradient-based approaches to safe learning. Our approach to this problem, Differentiable Symbolic Execution (DSE), samples control flow paths in a program, symbolically constructs worst-case "safety losses" along these paths, and backpropagates the gradients of these losses through program operations using a generalization of the REINFORCE estimator. We evaluate the method on a mix of synthetic tasks and real-world benchmarks. Our experiments show that DSE significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art DiffAI method on these tasks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Composing Linear Layers from Irreducibles

    cs.LG 2025-07 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A rotor-based layer built from bivector exponentials approximates LLM attention projections with O(log^2 d) parameters and competitive downstream performance.

  2. Neuro-Symbolic AI in 2024: A Systematic Review

    cs.AI 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A systematic review of 158 Neuro-Symbolic AI papers finds research concentrated in learning and inference, with explainability, trustworthiness, and Meta-Cognition as underrepresented gaps.

Pith tools