Embodied AI: Emerging Risks and Opportunities for Policy Action

Alexander Robey; Fazl Barez; Jakob M\"okander; Jared Perlo; Luciano Floridi

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 6 cited by

Embodied AI: Emerging Risks and Opportunities for Policy Action

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Existing robot, vehicle, and virtual-agent policies leave most embodied-AI risks under-governed, and the gaps demand urgent but targeted fixes.

desk verdict A coherent policy synthesis on embodied AI governance with a useful risk taxonomy and a Table 1 that overclaims precision, but it deserves serious review. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.00117 v2 pith:TQJ5MGMY submitted 2025-08-28 cs.CY cs.AIcs.RO

Jared Perlo , Alexander Robey , Fazl Barez , Luciano Floridi , Jakob Mökander This is my paper

classification cs.CYcs.AIcs.RO

keywords embodiedAIgovernancerisktaxonomyroboticspolicyautonomousvehiclessafetyliabilitylabordisplacement

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Embodied AI—agents that learn, reason, and act in the physical world—is advancing faster than the rules meant to govern it. The paper argues that existing policies for industrial robots, autonomous vehicles, and virtual agentic AI do not cover the full set of risks embodied systems create, and that the gaps are urgent enough for policymakers to act now. It builds its case in three steps: a taxonomy of physical, informational, economic, and social harms; a coverage analysis of US, EU, and UK frameworks; and a set of targeted recommendations, including mandatory certification, clearer liability, post-deployment monitoring, and economic adaptation. If the argument holds, the path forward is not sweeping new legislation but deliberate extension and patching of existing frameworks before a crisis forces rushed rulemaking.

What carries the argument

The analytical engine is the four-part risk taxonomy—physical, informational, economic, and social—each subdivided into concrete subrisks, paired with a coverage matrix (Table 1) that rates existing policies for classical robots, autonomous vehicles, and virtual agents on each subrisk using a three-level scale (substantial, partial, or little coverage). The taxonomy organizes the field; the matrix turns that organization into a gap analysis. On top sits a recommendation stack—certification, standards, liability, monitoring, and economic adaptation—that is meant to attach to the gaps the matrix reveals.

What would settle it

A re-rating of Table 1 by independent policy analysts using a published coding protocol could settle the claim: if most risk subcategories were rated substantially covered by existing statutes, the paper's conclusion of critical gaps would collapse. Alternatively, a documented case where a current statute already mandates pre-deployment certification and post-market monitoring for a general-purpose mobile EAI system would undercut the claim that no such framework exists.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that embodied AI systems—defined as the intersection of agentic AI and classical robots—pose a distinct bundle of risks that current governance neither fully covers nor coherently assigns to a regulator. It identifies four risk families: physical (malicious and accidental harm), informational (privacy and misinformation), economic (labor displacement, inequality, power concentration), and social (bias, accountability, transparency, unhealthy attachment, transformative effects). It then rates existing US, EU, and UK policies against these risks and finds that while some frameworks—the EU Machinery Regulation, the EU AI Act, the GDPR, drone rules, and the UK's Auto

Load-bearing premise

The policy-gap conclusion rests on the assumption that the hand-selected US, EU, and UK statutes and the subjective coverage ratings in Table 1 accurately represent how well existing governance covers every EAI risk.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Mandatory pre-deployment testing and certification for EAI systems, tiered by operational context and capability, becomes a concrete near-term policy target rather than an abstract call for oversight.
Liability frameworks need to designate a responsible entity for fully autonomous operation, extending precedents such as the UK's Authorized Self-Driving Entity to other mobile EAI forms.
Post-deployment monitoring and black-box-style data retention rules need to be harmonized across the EU Machinery Regulation and the AI Act, whose current one-year versus six-month retention requirements conflict.
Economic and social risks—labor displacement, inequality, power concentration, and human-EAI attachment—require proactive policy blueprints because they arise from EAI working too well, not from technical failure.
Industry-led standards can move faster than legislation and can fill near-term gaps, but voluntary standards alone will not cover the statutory holes in certification and enforcement.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the Table 1 ratings are even roughly right, the first enforceable EAI rules will likely come from extending familiar AV-style operational-design-domain certification to other mobile robots, because that is where regulatory precedents already exist.
The paper's four-part taxonomy could be operationalized as a risk registry: each identified subrisk can be mapped to concrete evaluable metrics, turning a policy argument into an engineering target for benchmark developers.
The internal contradiction between the Machinery Regulation's one-year data-retention mandate and the AI Act's six-month minimum suggests that harmonization of existing rules, rather than new law, may be the quickest concrete safety win.
If the observation that 'embodied AI' is partly a marketing label is taken seriously, regulators should audit whether new products actually fall under existing machinery, drone, or vehicle rules before creating new regimes.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The paper is a solid policy synthesis, not a research breakthrough. What it does well is package a four-part risk taxonomy—physical, informational, economic, social—and map existing US/EU/UK frameworks against it. That integrated package is new, and the concrete examples (the EU Machinery Regulation/AI Act retention-period conflict, the UK Automated Vehicles Act's ASDE and NUiC roles, the GDPR Article 22 tension with fully autonomous systems) are genuinely informative. The recommendations—certification, clarified liability, post-deployment monitoring, attention to economic and social adaptation—are pragmatic and grounded in cited standards and statutes. The authors also do themselves credit by stating scope limitations up front: civilian focus, three geographies, and the admission that some risk categories overlap.

The soft spots are real but proportionate. The biggest is Table 1. The H/partial/# ratings are presented as the evidence base for “significant and concerning gaps,” but there is no coding protocol, no source matrix tying each cell to specific statutory provisions, and no inter-rater check. A different analyst could reasonably rate several rows differently—for instance, treating the EU Machinery Regulation plus AI Act as substantial certification coverage, or GDPRP Article 22 as an existing accountability mechanism. That would shift the gap analysis and the urgency framing. The authors acknowledge methodological challenges in Section 5 but do not address how Table 1 was constructed, which is a genuine reproducibility gap. Minor related issues: some empirical claims (industrial injuries after AI-controlled robots) rest on news reports rather than systematic data, and the deployment trajectory estimates are inherently uncertain. These do not sink the central claim—Section 3.1's qualitative discussion supports several specific gaps independently—but they weaken the false precision of the heat map.

The self-citations are not a problem; they support background claims and the circularity burden is low.

Overall: a useful, fair-minded paper for policy audiences and researchers wanting a structured map of EAI risks and existing governance. It deserves a serious referee, but the referee should press the authors to make Table 1 auditable—either with a replicable coding method or by softening the ratings to provisional judgments. I'd bring it to a reading group and would cite it as a convenient reference for the EAI risk/policy landscape.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper argues that embodied AI (EAI) systems present physical, informational, economic, and social risks that are not adequately covered by existing US/EU/UK frameworks governing industrial robots, autonomous vehicles, and virtual agents. It contributes (1) a four-part risk taxonomy, (2) a qualitative policy-gap analysis summarized in Table 1, and (3) policy recommendations including certification, benchmarks, liability clarification, post-deployment monitoring, and economic adaptation measures. The central claim is that existing policies are insufficient and should be extended rather than replaced.

Significance. If taken as a policy-scoping document, the paper is useful and timely. Its risk taxonomy is broad and well referenced, and its recommendations are concrete and actionable. The paper is honest about several limitations (geographic scope, civilian focus, overlap with LLM risks) and engages with counterarguments such as market forces and hardware constraints. The main contribution is qualitative synthesis rather than formal analysis; there are no fitted parameters, machine-checked proofs, or empirical datasets. The credibility of the policy-gap conclusion therefore rests heavily on the transparency and rigor of the coverage assessment in Table 1, which currently lacks auditability.

major comments (3)

[Section 3.2 / Table 1] The load-bearing claim that existing governance has 'significant and concerning gaps' is operationalized through the H/partial/# ratings in Table 1, but the table is presented without a coding protocol, a source matrix linking each cell to specific statutory provisions, or inter-rater reliability checks. A different analyst could reasonably rate, for example, the EU Machinery Regulation plus AI Act as providing substantial certification coverage for autonomous machinery, or GDPR Article 22 as an existing accountability mechanism, which would change several cells and weaken the conclusion. Section 5's limitations discuss geography and application scope but not this methodology. The authors should either add a transparent coding procedure with a provision-by-provision source matrix, or explicitly reframe Table 1 as an illustrative expert judgment rather than an auditable evidence base.
[Section 2.1, refs [66]-[68]] The claim that 'several recent reports document an increase in industrial injuries following the introduction of AI-controlled robots' is supported only by individual news stories about particular incidents, not by systematic occupational-injury data. This is not a fatal flaw, but the wording overstates the evidence. The authors should either hedge to 'documented incidents' or cite systematic studies of robot-related injury rates if available.
[Section 3.2, data-retention example] The paper states that the EU Machinery Regulation's one-year data-retention requirement and the AI Act's 'at least six months' requirement are 'contradictory guidance.' This is not a contradiction: a one-year minimum satisfies a six-month minimum. If the authors intend to illustrate regulatory confusion, they should identify an actual conflict (e.g., different scopes, unclear interaction between MR and AI Act obligations) or remove this example.

minor comments (4)

[Section 3.2] Typo: 'EAI sytems' should be 'EAI systems'.
[Table 1 caption] The paper uses 'A Vs' with an awkward space in the table caption and elsewhere; consider 'AVs'.
[Section 4.1] Typo/incomplete sentence: 'Researchers should and build on this progress' appears to be missing a verb.
[Section 3.1] The discussion of GDPR Article 22 and autonomous EAI is useful but would benefit from a more precise statement of how Article 22's 'automated decision-making' test would apply to an embodied system that acts but does not necessarily make a 'decision' in the GDPR sense.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the policy analysis is self-contained; author self-citations are background support only.

full rationale

This is a policy analysis rather than a formal derivation: it constructs a risk taxonomy from external literature, surveys US/EU/UK statutes, assigns qualitative coverage ratings in Table 1, and proposes policy recommendations. There are no fitted parameters, no equations, and no 'prediction' that is statistically forced by construction. The central claim—that existing frameworks are insufficient—is made qualitatively and supported by the statutory survey (e.g., the EU Machinery Regulation/AI Act retention-period conflict, unclear liability for Level 4/5 AVs, and the absence of a post-deployment monitoring regime); it is not derived from a model fitted to the same conclusion. Table 1's coverage ratings are subjective expert codings without a protocol or inter-rater check, which is an evidence/reproducibility limitation, not circularity: the ratings are inputs to the gap analysis, and the paper does not claim they are outputs of an independent derivation. Several authors cite their own prior work (Mökander & Floridi on sociotechnical pragmatism and AI auditing; Robey on LLM jailbreaks; Barez et al. on AI-enabled authoritarianism), but these are used for background scope choices and risk plausibility, not as load-bearing justifications of the paper's main policy conclusion. No uniqueness theorem, ansatz, or fitted result is imported from the authors' own prior work. Accordingly, the derivation chain does not reduce to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is a qualitative policy analysis, so there are no fitted numbers or new postulated entities. Its central claim depends on assumptions about future EAI deployment, the distinctness of embodied risks, and the reliability of the authors' judgment-based coverage ratings in Table 1.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Embodied AI systems will be deployed at scale in civilian settings with increasing autonomy in the near future.
The introduction and Section 2 repeatedly project that EAI capabilities and domains 'are likely to expand significantly in the coming years'; the urgency of the policy call rests on this trajectory.
domain assumption Physical embodiment creates risks materially distinct from virtual AI, warranting separate regulation.
This is the central framing of the paper. The authors address overlap with LLM risks in Section 5 but maintain that embodiment makes risks immediate, pervasive, and scale-dependent.
ad hoc to paper The coverage ratings in Table 1 accurately reflect the adequacy of existing policies.
No coding protocol, source matrix, or validation is given. The table is the authors' own judgment and directly drives the gap analysis in Section 3.2.
domain assumption The selected US, EU, and UK statutes and standards are representative of relevant governance for EAI.
The limitations section acknowledges geography and scope choices, but no systematic selection criterion or search protocol is provided for which laws and standards were analyzed.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Embodied AI: Emerging Risks and Opportunities for Policy Action." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TQJ5MGMY

@misc{pith2026250900117,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Embodied AI: Emerging Risks and Opportunities for Policy Action},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TQJ5MGMY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.00117}
}

read the original abstract

The field of embodied AI (EAI) is rapidly advancing. Unlike virtual AI, EAI systems can exist in, learn from, reason about, and act in the physical world. With recent advances in AI models and hardware, EAI systems are becoming increasingly capable across wider operational domains. While EAI systems can offer many benefits, they also pose significant risks, including physical harm from malicious use, mass surveillance, as well as economic and societal disruption. These risks require urgent attention from policymakers, as existing policies governing industrial robots and autonomous vehicles are insufficient to address the full range of concerns EAI systems present. To help address this issue, this paper makes three contributions. First, we provide a taxonomy of the physical, informational, economic, and social risks EAI systems pose. Second, we analyze policies in the US, EU, and UK to assess how existing frameworks address these risks and to identify critical gaps. We conclude by offering policy recommendations for the safe and beneficial deployment of EAI systems, such as mandatory testing and certification schemes, clarified liability frameworks, and strategies to manage EAI's potentially transformative economic and societal impacts.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.00117 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** A comparison of classical robots, agentic AI, and EAI EAI represents the intersection of agentic AI and classical robots. Many existing robots, such as industrial machines (including articulated arms, gantry systems, and other types) lack the autonomy and reasoning capabilities that agentic AI possesses. Conversely, many agentic AI systems such as chatbots or virtual assistants currently lack physical embodiment. Re… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** An illustrated summary of risks from embodied AI. We identify four key risk categories and provide several existing or potential mechanisms through which EAI systems could cause harm within each risk area. spanning visual, auditory, and tactile information—during deployment [12]. Like text-based virtual AI models, which are known to memorize and expose personally identifiable information [75, 76], commercial robots … view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Underwriting the Agent Economy: The Blueprint for an AI Insurance Stack
cs.CY 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

Affirmative AI-agent insurance with billion-scale limits is achievable by 2030 solely through coordinated industry build-out of an eight-component stack spanning data, CAT models, standards, contracts, underwriting, p...
Underwriting the Agent Economy: The Blueprint for an AI Insurance Stack
cs.CY 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A coordinated eight-component insurance infrastructure could make affirmative AI-agent coverage with billion-dollar limits achievable by 2030.
Safety in Embodied AI: A Survey of Risks, Attacks, and Defenses
cs.CR 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

The survey organizes over 400 papers on embodied AI safety into a multi-level taxonomy and flags overlooked issues such as fragile multimodal fusion and unstable planning under jailbreaks.
Safety in Embodied AI: A Survey of Risks, Attacks, and Defenses
cs.CR 2026-03 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

A multi-level taxonomy of risks, attacks, and defenses across the full embodied AI pipeline, synthesizing 500+ papers and flagging overlooked failure modes.
Physical AI Governance: From Theory to Practice Across Life Cycle
cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

A survey that organizes Physical AI governance into five principles and a five-stage lifecycle, with stage-specific operational practices.
A Co-Evolutionary Theory of Human-AI Coexistence: Mutualism, Governance, and Dynamics in Complex Societies
cs.CY 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

Human-AI coexistence is best modeled as conditional mutualism under governance, formalized as a multiplex dynamical system whose simulations show stable high-coexistence equilibria only under balanced institutional oversight.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

218 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

[1]

A call for embodied AI, September 2024

Giuseppe Paolo, Jonas Gonzalez-Billandon, and Balázs Kégl. A call for embodied AI, September 2024. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.03824. arXiv:2402.03824 [cs]

arXiv 2024
[2]

Aligning Cyber Space with Physical World: A Comprehensive Survey on Embodied AI, August 2024

Yang Liu, Weixing Chen, Yongjie Bai, Xiaodan Liang, Guanbin Li, Wen Gao, and Liang Lin. Aligning Cyber Space with Physical World: A Comprehensive Survey on Embodied AI, August 2024. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.06886. arXiv:2407.06886 [cs]

arXiv 2024
[3]

Drone- Aided Delivery Methods, Challenge, and the Future: A Methodological Review

Xueping Li, Jose Tupayachi, Aliza Sharmin, and Madelaine Martinez Ferguson. Drone- Aided Delivery Methods, Challenge, and the Future: A Methodological Review. Drones, 7(3):191, March 2023. ISSN 2504-446X. doi: 10.3390/drones7030191. URL https: //www.mdpi.com/2504-446X/7/3/191

work page doi:10.3390/drones7030191 2023
[4]

Chinese researchers develop amphibious spherical robot assisting in po- lice patrol in E.China’s Zhejiang

Du Qiongfang. Chinese researchers develop amphibious spherical robot assisting in po- lice patrol in E.China’s Zhejiang. Global Times, December 2024. URL https://www. globaltimes.cn/page/202412/1324773.shtml

2024
[5]

AI robots may hold key to nursing Japan’s ageing population

Kiyoshi Takenaka. AI robots may hold key to nursing Japan’s ageing population. Reuters, February 2025. URL https: //www.reuters.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/ ai-robots-may-hold-key-nursing-japans-ageing-population-2025-02-28/

2025
[6]

AI robots are helping South Korea’s seniors feel less alone

Michelle Kim. AI robots are helping South Korea’s seniors feel less alone. Rest of World , August 2025. URL https://restofworld.org/2025/ korea-ai-robot-senior-care-hyodol/?utm_source=linkedin&utm_medium= social&utm_campaign=row-social

2025
[7]

The rise of ai robots: Physical ai is coming for you

Rob Garlick, Wenyan Fei, Tahmid Quddus Islam, Anjola Odunsi, Adam Spielman, Martin Wilkie, Helen Krause, Matthew Moffat, Carol Gibson, Alex Miller, and Anuj Gangahar. The rise of ai robots: Physical ai is coming for you. Technical report, Citi GPS: Global Perspectives & Solutions, December 2024. URL https://ir. citi.com/gps/H558-XNr_iTlGa7Qq7H9AYb5ZT2W851...

2024
[8]

The coming wave: Technology, Power, and the Twenty-First Century’s Greatest Dilemma

Mustafa Suleyman and Michael Bhaskar. The coming wave: Technology, Power, and the Twenty-First Century’s Greatest Dilemma. Crown, New York, 2023. ISBN 978-0-593-59395-0 978-0-593-72817-8

2023

Show all 218 references

[9]

Atkinson

Robert D. Atkinson. Robots and International Economic Development. ITIF Policy Report, January 2021. URL ssrn.com/abstract=3875581

2021
[10]

Prescott and Julie M

Tony J. Prescott and Julie M. Robillard. Are friends electric? The benefits and risks of human-robot relationships. iScience, 24(1):101993, January 2021. ISSN 25890042. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101993. URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/ S2589004220311901

2021
[11]

The Future of Embodied AI: Containing and Mitigating the Dark and Creepy Sides of Robotics, Autonomous Vehicles, and AI

Jo Ann Oravec. The Future of Embodied AI: Containing and Mitigating the Dark and Creepy Sides of Robotics, Autonomous Vehicles, and AI. In Good Robot, Bad Robot, pages 245–276. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2022. ISBN 978-3-031-14012-9 978-3-031-14013-

2022
[12]

URL https://link.springer.com/10.1007/ 978-3-031-14013-6_9

doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-14013-6_9. URL https://link.springer.com/10.1007/ 978-3-031-14013-6_9 . Series Title: Social and Cultural Studies of Robots and AI

doi
[13]

OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Model, September 2024

Moo Jin Kim, Karl Pertsch, Siddharth Karamcheti, Ted Xiao, Ashwin Balakrishna, Suraj Nair, Rafael Rafailov, Ethan Foster, Grace Lam, Pannag Sanketi, Quan Vuong, Thomas Kollar, Benjamin Burchfiel, Russ Tedrake, Dorsa Sadigh, Sergey Levine, Percy Liang, and Chelsea Finn. OpenVLA...

2024 arXiv
[14]

All feedback is welcome

Gemini Robotics Team, Saminda Abeyruwan, Joshua Ainslie, Jean-Baptiste Alayrac, Montser- rat Gonzalez Arenas, Travis Armstrong, Ashwin Balakrishna, Robert Baruch, Maria Bauza, Michiel Blokzijl, Steven Bohez, Konstantinos Bousmalis, Anthony Brohan, Thomas Buschmann, Arunkumar B...

2025 arXiv
[15]

Qwen2.5-VL Techni- cal Report, February 2025

Shuai Bai, Keqin Chen, Xuejing Liu, Jialin Wang, Wenbin Ge, Sibo Song, Kai Dang, Peng Wang, Shijie Wang, Jun Tang, Humen Zhong, Yuanzhi Zhu, Mingkun Yang, Zhaohai Li, Jian- qiang Wan, Pengfei Wang, Wei Ding, Zheren Fu, Yiheng Xu, Jiabo Ye, Xi Zhang, Tianbao Xie, Zesen Cheng, H...

2025 arXiv
[16]

URL https://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/ nvidia-isaac-gr00t-n1-open-humanoid-robot-foundation-model-simulation-frameworks

NVIDIA Announces Isaac GR00T N1 — the World’s First Open Humanoid Robot Foundation Model — and Simulation Frameworks to Speed Robot De- velopment, March 2025. URL https://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/ nvidia-isaac-gr00t-n1-open-humanoid-robot-foundation-model-simulation-frameworks

2025
[17]

China pits humanoid robots against humans in half-marathon for first time

Alessandro Diviggiano and Eduardo Baptista. China pits humanoid robots against humans in half-marathon for first time. Reuters, April 2025. URL https://www.reuters.com/world/china/ china-pits-humanoid-robots-against-humans-half-marathon-2025-04-19/

2025
[18]

URL https: //www.figure.ai/news/scaling-helix-logistics

Scaling Helix: a New State of the Art in Humanoid Logistics, June 2025. URL https: //www.figure.ai/news/scaling-helix-logistics

2025
[19]

Technical report, Physical Intelligence, February 2025

Open sourcing pi0. Technical report, Physical Intelligence, February 2025. URL https: //www.physicalintelligence.company/blog/openpi

2025
[20]

URL https:// huggingface.co/unitreerobotics

Unitree open-source embodied intelligence datasets and models. URL https:// huggingface.co/unitreerobotics
[21]

data gap

Ken Goldberg. Good old-fashioned engineering can close the 100,000-year “data gap” in robotics. Science Robotics, 10(105):eaea7390, August 2025. ISSN 2470-9476. doi: 10.1126/ scirobotics.aea7390. URL https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/scirobotics. aea7390

2025 doi
[22]

All feedback is welcome

Open X.-Embodiment Collaboration, Abby O’Neill, Abdul Rehman, Abhinav Gupta, Abhiram Maddukuri, Abhishek Gupta, Abhishek Padalkar, Abraham Lee, Acorn Pooley, Agrim Gupta, Ajay Mandlekar, Ajinkya Jain, Albert Tung, Alex Bewley, Alex Herzog, Alex Irpan, Alexander Khazatsky, Anan...
[23]

Recent Advances in Tactile Sensory Systems: Mechanisms, Fabrication, and Applications

Jianguo Xi, Huaiwen Yang, Xinyu Li, Ruilai Wei, Taiping Zhang, Lin Dong, Zhenjun Yang, Zuqing Yuan, Junlu Sun, and Qilin Hua. Recent Advances in Tactile Sensory Systems: Mechanisms, Fabrication, and Applications. Nanomaterials, 14(5):465, March 2024. ISSN 2079-4991. doi: 10.33...

2024 doi
[24]

Robot Dexterity – Handling our future

Jenny Read. Robot Dexterity – Handling our future. Technical report, Advanced Re- search and Invention Agency, 2024. URL https://www.aria.org.uk/media/xamlbwdo/ aria-robotic-dexterity-programme-thesis.pdf

2024
[25]

Data will solve robotics and automation: True or false?

Nancy M. Amato, Seth Hutchinson, Animesh Garg, Aude Billard, Daniela Rus, Russ Tedrake, Frank Park, and Ken Goldberg. “Data will solve robotics and automation: True or false?”: A debate. Science Robotics , 10(105):eaea7897, August 2025. ISSN 2470-

2025
[26]

Real-Time Execution of Action Chunk- ing Flow Policies, June 2025

Kevin Black, Manuel Galliker, and Sergey Levine. Real-Time Execution of Action Chunk- ing Flow Policies, June 2025. URL https://www.physicalintelligence.company/ download/real_time_chunking.pdf

2025
[27]

America Is Missing The New Labor Economy – Robotics Part 1

Dylan Patel, Reyk Knuhtsen, Niko Ciminelli, Jeremie Eliahou Ontiveros, Joe Ryu, and Robert Ghilduta. America Is Missing The New Labor Economy – Robotics Part 1. Technical report, SemiAnalysis, March 2025. URL https://semianalysis.com/2025/03/ 11/america-is-missing-the-new-labo...

2025
[28]

Bloomberg, May 2025

China’s Startups Race to Dominate the Coming AI Robot Boom. Bloomberg, May 2025. URL https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2025-china-ai-robots-boom/

2025
[29]

Embodied AI Agents: Modeling the World, June 2025

Pascale Fung, Yoram Bachrach, Asli Celikyilmaz, Kamalika Chaudhuri, Delong Chen, Willy Chung, Emmanuel Dupoux, Hervé Jégou, Alessandro Lazaric, Arjun Majumdar, Andrea Madotto, Franziska Meier, Florian Metze, Théo Moutakanni, Juan Pino, Basile Terver, Joseph Tighe, and Jitendra...

2025 arXiv
[30]

Luciano Floridi and J.W. Sanders. On the Morality of Artificial Agents. Minds and Ma- chines, 14(3):349–379, August 2004. ISSN 0924-6495, 1572-8641. doi: 10.1023/B: MIND.0000035461.63578.9d. URL https://link.springer.com/10.1023/B:MIND. 0000035461.63578.9d

2004
[31]

Characterizing AI Agents for Alignment and Gover- nance, 2025

Atoosa Kasirzadeh and Iason Gabriel. Characterizing AI Agents for Alignment and Gover- nance, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.21848. Version Number: 1

2025 arXiv
[32]

Robots, Jobs, Taxes, and Responsibilities

Luciano Floridi. Robots, Jobs, Taxes, and Responsibilities. Philosophy & Technology, 30 (1):1–4, March 2017. ISSN 2210-5433, 2210-5441. doi: 10.1007/s13347-017-0257-3. URL http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13347-017-0257-3

2017 doi
[33]

Human–robot collaboration and machine learning: A systematic review of recent research

Francesco Semeraro, Alexander Griffiths, and Angelo Cangelosi. Human–robot collaboration and machine learning: A systematic review of recent research. Robotics and Computer- Integrated Manufacturing, 79:102432, 2023. ISSN 0736-5845. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.rcim.2022.10...

2023
[34]

Mazumder, M.F

A. Mazumder, M.F. Sahed, Z. Tasneem, P. Das, F.R. Badal, M.F. Ali, M.H. Ahamed, S.H. Abhi, S.K. Sarker, S.K. Das, M.M. Hasan, M.M. Islam, and M.R. Islam. Towards next generation digital twin in robotics: Trends, scopes, challenges, and future. Heliyon, 9(2): e13359, February 2...

2023 doi
[35]

Towards Robust and Secure Embodied AI: A Survey on Vulnerabilities and Attacks, February 2025

Wenpeng Xing, Minghao Li, Mohan Li, and Meng Han. Towards Robust and Secure Embodied AI: A Survey on Vulnerabilities and Attacks, February 2025. URLhttp://arxiv.org/abs/ 2502.13175. arXiv:2502.13175 [cs]

2025 arXiv
[36]

I, Robot

Isaac Asimov. I, Robot. Panther, St. Albans, reprint edition, 1977. ISBN 978-0-586-02532-1

1977
[37]

Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom New York, NY , 2024

Woodrow Barfield, Yueh-Hsuan Weng, and Ugo Pagallo, editors.The Cambridge handbook on the law, policy, and regulation of human-robot interaction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom New York, NY , 2024. ISBN 978-1-00-938670-8

2024
[38]

Autonomy 2.0: The Quest for Economies of Scale

Shuang Wu, Bo Yu, Shaoshan Liu, and Yuhao Zhu. Autonomy 2.0: The Quest for Economies of Scale. Communications of the ACM, 68(4):28–32, April 2025. ISSN 0001-0782, 1557-7317. doi: 10.1145/3708012. URL https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3708012

2025 doi
[39]

Kemin Zhou, John Comstock Doyle, and John C. Doyle. Essentials of robust control. Prentice Hall international editions. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1998. ISBN 978-0-13- 525833-0 978-0-13-790874-5. Preprint. All feedback is welcome. 19

1998
[40]

Adaptive control

Karl Johan Aström and Björn Wittenmark. Adaptive control. Addison-Wesley, Reading (Mass.), 2nd ed edition, 1995. ISBN 978-0-201-55866-1

1995
[41]

A Taxonomy of Factors Influencing Perceived Safety in Human–Robot Interaction

Neziha Akalin, Andrey Kiselev, Annica Kristoffersson, and Amy Loutfi. A Taxonomy of Factors Influencing Perceived Safety in Human–Robot Interaction. International Jour- nal of Social Robotics , 15(12):1993–2004, December 2023. ISSN 1875-4791, 1875-

1993
[42]

Ames, Xiangru Xu, Jessy W

Aaron D. Ames, Xiangru Xu, Jessy W. Grizzle, and Paulo Tabuada. Control Barrier Function Based Quadratic Programs for Safety Critical Systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 62(8):3861–3876, August 2017. ISSN 0018-9286, 1558-2523. doi: 10.1109/TAC. 2016.2638961. URL h...

2017
[43]

A Fully Automated Framework for Control of Linear Systems from Temporal Logic Specifications

Marius Kloetzer and Calin Belta. A Fully Automated Framework for Control of Linear Systems from Temporal Logic Specifications. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control , 53(1):287–297, February 2008. ISSN 0018-9286. doi: 10.1109/TAC.2007.914952. URL http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/do...

2008
[44]

Concrete Problems in AI Safety, July 2016

Dario Amodei, Chris Olah, Jacob Steinhardt, Paul Christiano, John Schulman, and Dan Mané. Concrete Problems in AI Safety, July 2016. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.06565. arXiv:1606.06565 [cs]

2016 arXiv
[45]

Mayne, J.B

D.Q. Mayne, J.B. Rawlings, C.V . Rao, and P.O.M. Scokaert. Constrained model pre- dictive control: Stability and optimality. Automatica, 36(6):789–814, June 2000. ISSN 00051098. doi: 10.1016/S0005-1098(99)00214-9. URL https://linkinghub.elsevier. com/retrieve/pii/S0005109899002149

doi
[46]

Generating Robot Constitutions & Benchmarks for Semantic Safety, 2025

Pierre Sermanet, Anirudha Majumdar, Alex Irpan, Dmitry Kalashnikov, and Vikas Sindhwani. Generating Robot Constitutions & Benchmarks for Semantic Safety, 2025. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2503.08663. Version Number: 1

2025 arXiv
[47]

URL https://docs.un.org/en/A/C.1/79/L.77

General and complete disarmament: lethal autonomous weapons systems, December 2024. URL https://docs.un.org/en/A/C.1/79/L.77

2024
[48]

Michael J. D. Vermeer, Tim Bonds, Emily Lathrop, and Gregory Smith. Averting a Robot Catastrophe: Preparing for Converging Trends in Robotics and Frontier AI, April 2025. URL https://osf.io/ymvf5_v1

2025
[49]

Cooperative inverse reinforcement learning

Dylan Hadfield-Menell, Stuart J Russell, Pieter Abbeel, and Anca Dragan. Cooperative inverse reinforcement learning. In D. Lee, M. Sugiyama, U. Luxburg, I. Guyon, and R. Gar- nett, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume 29. Curran As- sociates, Inc...

2016
[50]

Watson, Jakob Mökander, and Luciano Floridi

David S. Watson, Jakob Mökander, and Luciano Floridi. Competing narratives in AI ethics: a defense of sociotechnical pragmatism. AI & SOCIETY, December 2024. ISSN 0951-5666, 1435-5655. doi: 10.1007/s00146-024-02128-2. URL https://link.springer.com/10. 1007/s00146-024-02128-2

2024 doi
[51]

Auditing large language models: a three-layered approach

Jakob Mökander, Jonas Schuett, Hannah Rose Kirk, and Luciano Floridi. Auditing large language models: a three-layered approach. AI and Ethics , 4(4):1085–1115, November
[52]

As ai advances, u.s

Eric Schmitt and Charlie Savage. As ai advances, u.s. seeks to keep autonomous weapons in check. The New York Times, November 2023. URL https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/ 21/us/politics/ai-drones-war-law.html . Preprint. All feedback is welcome. 20

2023
[53]

An Approach to Technical AGI Safety and Security, April 2025

Rohin Shah, Alex Irpan, Alexander Matt Turner, Anna Wang, Arthur Conmy, David Lindner, Jonah Brown-Cohen, Lewis Ho, Neel Nanda, Raluca Ada Popa, Rishub Jain, Rory Greig, Samuel Albanie, Scott Emmons, Sebastian Farquhar, Sébastien Krier, Senthooran Rajamanoha- ran, Sophie Bridg...

2025 arXiv
[54]

Exclusive: Silicon valley startup breaks cover with plans for robo-armies

Colin Demarest. Exclusive: Silicon valley startup breaks cover with plans for robo-armies. Axios, April 2025. URL https://www.axios.com/2025/04/16/ scout-ai-military-autonomous-fury

2025
[55]

What we know about ukraine’s army of robot dogs

David Hambling. What we know about ukraine’s army of robot dogs. Forbes, August 2024. URL https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidhambling/2024/08/16/ what-we-know-about-ukraines-army-of-robot-dogs/

2024
[56]

Cummings

M.L. Cummings. Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Warfare. Technical report, Chatham House, January 2017. URL https://www. chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/publications/research/ 2017-01-26-artificial-intelligence-future-warfare-cummings-final.pdf

2017
[57]

Universal and transferable adversarial attacks on aligned language models

Andy Zou, Zifan Wang, Nicholas Carlini, Milad Nasr, J Zico Kolter, and Matt Fredrikson. Universal and transferable adversarial attacks on aligned language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.15043, 2023

2023 arXiv
[58]

Ukraine’s future vision and current capabilities for wag- ing ai-enabled autonomous warfare

Kateryna Bondar. Ukraine’s future vision and current capabilities for wag- ing ai-enabled autonomous warfare. Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) , March 2025. URL https://www.csis.org/analysis/ ukraines-future-vision-and-current-capabilities-waging-ai-enable...

2025
[59]

Jailbreakbench: An open robustness benchmark for jailbreaking large language models

Patrick Chao, Edoardo Debenedetti, Alexander Robey, Maksym Andriushchenko, Francesco Croce, Vikash Sehwag, Edgar Dobriban, Nicolas Flammarion, George J Pappas, Florian Tramer, et al. Jailbreakbench: An open robustness benchmark for jailbreaking large language models. arXiv pre...

2024 arXiv
[60]

Smoothllm: Defending large language models against jailbreaking attacks

Alexander Robey, Eric Wong, Hamed Hassani, and George J Pappas. Smoothllm: Defending large language models against jailbreaking attacks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.03684, 2023

2023 arXiv
[61]

Jailbreaking llm-controlled robots

Alexander Robey, Zachary Ravichandran, Vijay Kumar, Hamed Hassani, and George J Pappas. Jailbreaking llm-controlled robots. In 2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2025

2025
[62]

Badrobot: Manipulating embodied llms in the physical world

Hangtao Zhang, Chenyu Zhu, Xianlong Wang, Ziqi Zhou, Changgan Yin, Minghui Li, Lulu Xue, Yichen Wang, Shengshan Hu, Aishan Liu, et al. Badrobot: Manipulating embodied llms in the physical world. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.20242, 2024

2024 arXiv
[63]

Jailbreaking black box large language models in twenty queries

Patrick Chao, Alexander Robey, Edgar Dobriban, Hamed Hassani, George J Pappas, and Eric Wong. Jailbreaking black box large language models in twenty queries. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.08419, 2023

2023 arXiv
[64]

Adversarial attacks on robotic vision language action models

Eliot Krzysztof Jones, Alexander Robey, Andy Zou, Zachary Ravichandran, George J Pappas, Hamed Hassani, Matt Fredrikson, and J Zico Kolter. Adversarial attacks on robotic vision language action models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.03350, 2025

2025 arXiv
[65]

Exploring the adversarial vulnerabilities of vision-language-action models in robotics

Taowen Wang, Cheng Han, James Chenhao Liang, Wenhao Yang, Dongfang Liu, Luna Xinyu Zhang, Qifan Wang, Jiebo Luo, and Ruixiang Tang. Exploring the adversarial vulnerabilities of vision-language-action models in robotics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.13587, 2024

2024 arXiv
[66]

Man crushed to death by robot in south korea, November 2023

Emily Atkinson. Man crushed to death by robot in south korea, November 2023. URL https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-67354709 . Accessed: 2025-05-12

2023
[67]

Tesla robot attacks worker in austin factory and leaves them bleeding, December 2023

Fortune Staff. Tesla robot attacks worker in austin factory and leaves them bleeding, December 2023. URL https://fortune.com/2023/12/27/ tesla-factory-robot-worker-attack-injury/ . Accessed: 2025-05-12

2023
[68]

Safety guardrails for llm-enabled robots

Zachary Ravichandran, Alexander Robey, Vijay Kumar, George J Pappas, and Hamed Hassani. Safety guardrails for llm-enabled robots. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.07885, 2025

2025
[69]

AI Alignment: A Comprehensive Survey, April 2025

Jiaming Ji, Tianyi Qiu, Boyuan Chen, Borong Zhang, Hantao Lou, Kaile Wang, Yawen Duan, Zhonghao He, Lukas Vierling, Donghai Hong, Jiayi Zhou, Zhaowei Zhang, Fanzhi Zeng, Juntao Dai, Xuehai Pan, Kwan Yee Ng, Aidan O’Gara, Hua Xu, Brian Tse, Jie Fu, Stephen McAleer, Yaodong Yang...

2025 arXiv
[70]

Human–robot collaboration in manufacturing applications: a review

Eloise Matheson, Riccardo Minto, Emanuele GG Zampieri, Maurizio Faccio, and Giulio Rosati. Human–robot collaboration in manufacturing applications: a review. Robotics, 8(4): 100, 2019

2019
[71]

Redefining Robotics with Carolina Parada

Hannah Fry. Redefining Robotics with Carolina Parada. URL https://podcasts.apple. com/ro/podcast/redefining-robotics-with-carolina-parada/id1476316441? i=1000709450547
[72]

Alan F. T. Winfield, Matimba Swana, Jonathan Ives, and Sabine Hauert. On the ethical governance of swarm robotic systems in the real world. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences , 383(2289):20240142, January 2025. IS...

2025
[73]

24 amazon workers sent to hospital after robot accidentally un- leashes bear spray, December 2018

Soo Youn. 24 amazon workers sent to hospital after robot accidentally un- leashes bear spray, December 2018. URL https://abcnews.go.com/US/ 24-amazon-workers-hospital-bear-repellent-accident/story?id=59625712 . Accessed: 2025-05-12. Preprint. All feedback is welcome. 21

2018
[74]

SafeAPT: Safe Simulation-to-Real Robot Learning using Diverse Policies Learned in Simulation, 2022

Rituraj Kaushik, Karol Arndt, and Ville Kyrki. SafeAPT: Safe Simulation-to-Real Robot Learning using Diverse Policies Learned in Simulation, 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/ abs/2201.13248. Version Number: 1

2022 arXiv
[75]

Scalable extraction of training data from (production) language models

Milad Nasr, Nicholas Carlini, Jonathan Hayase, Matthew Jagielski, A Feder Cooper, Daphne Ippolito, Christopher A Choquette-Choo, Eric Wallace, Florian Tramèr, and Katherine Lee. Scalable extraction of training data from (production) language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.1...

2023 arXiv
[76]

The secret sharer: Evaluating and testing unintended memorization in neural networks

Nicholas Carlini, Chang Liu, Úlfar Erlingsson, Jernej Kos, and Dawn Song. The secret sharer: Evaluating and testing unintended memorization in neural networks. In 28th USENIX security symposium (USENIX security 19), pages 267–284, 2019

2019
[77]

Ryan Calo

M. Ryan Calo. The Boundaries of Privacy Harm. Indiana Law Journal, 86:1131–1162, 2011. URL https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj/vol86/iss3/8/

2011
[78]

Using simulation and domain adaptation to improve efficiency of deep robotic grasping

Konstantinos Bousmalis, Alex Irpan, Paul Wohlhart, Yunfei Bai, Matthew Kelcey, Mrinal Kalakrishnan, Laura Downs, Julian Ibarz, Peter Pastor, Kurt Konolige, Sergey Levine, and Vincent Vanhoucke. Using simulation and domain adaptation to improve efficiency of deep robotic graspi...

2018
[79]

A Roomba recorded a woman on the toilet

Eileen Guo. A Roomba recorded a woman on the toilet. How did screenshots end up on Facebook? MIT Technology Review , December
[80]

AI-Enabled Coups: How a Small Group Could Use AI to Seize Power

Tom Davidson, Lukas Finnveden, and Rose Hadshar. AI-Enabled Coups: How a Small Group Could Use AI to Seize Power. Technical report, Fore- thought Institute, April 2025. URL https://www.forethought.org/research/ ai-enabled-coups-how-a-small-group-could-use-ai-to-seize-power

2025
[81]

Can LLM-Generated Misinformation Be Detected?, April 2024

Canyu Chen and Kai Shu. Can LLM-Generated Misinformation Be Detected?, April 2024. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.13788. arXiv:2309.13788 [cs]

2024 arXiv
[82]

On the risk of misinformation pollution with large language models

Yikang Pan, Liangming Pan, Wenhu Chen, Preslav Nakov, Min-Yen Kan, and William Yang Wang. On the risk of misinformation pollution with large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.13661, 2023. Preprint. All feedback is welcome. 22

2023 arXiv
[83]

Toward privacy-sensitive human–robot interaction: Privacy terms and human–data interaction in the personal robot era

Anna Chatzimichali, Ross Harrison, and Dimitrios Chrysostomou. Toward privacy-sensitive human–robot interaction: Privacy terms and human–data interaction in the personal robot era. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics, 12(1):160–174, 2020

2020
[84]

Large language models encode clinical knowledge

Karan Singhal, Shekoofeh Azizi, Tao Tu, S Sara Mahdavi, Jason Wei, Hyung Won Chung, Nathan Scales, Ajay Tanwani, Heather Cole-Lewis, Stephen Pfohl, et al. Large language models encode clinical knowledge. Nature, 620(7972):172–180, 2023

2023
[85]

Extrinsic hallucinations in llms

Lilian Weng. Extrinsic hallucinations in llms. lilianweng.github.io, Jul 2024. URL https: //lilianweng.github.io/posts/2024-07-07-hallucination/

2024
[86]

Robot Betrayal: a guide to the ethics of robotic deception

John Danaher. Robot Betrayal: a guide to the ethics of robotic deception. Ethics and Information Technology , 22(2):117–128, June 2020. ISSN 1388-1957, 1572-

2020
[87]

Alexa, Is Santa Claus Real? Slate, December 2018

Rachel Withers. Alexa, Is Santa Claus Real? Slate, December 2018. URL https://slate. com/technology/2018/12/alexa-siri-google-assistant-is-santa-real.html

2018
[88]

DeepSeek’s Answers Include Chinese Propaganda, Researchers Say

Steven Lee Myers. DeepSeek’s Answers Include Chinese Propaganda, Researchers Say. The New York Times , January 2025. URL https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/31/ technology/deepseek-chinese-propaganda.html

2025
[89]

Do language models know when they’re hallucinating references? arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.18248, 2023

Ayush Agrawal, Mirac Suzgun, Lester Mackey, and Adam Tauman Kalai. Do language models know when they’re hallucinating references? arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.18248, 2023

2023 arXiv
[90]

Humanoid robot: The AI accelerant

Jacqueline Du, Yuichiro Isayama, Daniela Costa, Mark Delaney, Nick Zheng, Olivia Xu, Timothy Zhao, Zhou Li, Zhihan Ye, and Hao Chen. Humanoid robot: The AI accelerant. Technical report, Goldman Sachs, January 2024. URL https://www.goldmansachs.com/pdfs/insights/pages/gs-resear...

2024
[91]

Daron Acemoglu and David Autor. Chapter 12 - skills, tasks and technologies: Impli- cations for employment and earnings**we thank amir kermani for outstanding research assistance and melanie wasserman for persistent, meticulous and ingenious work on all aspects of the chapter....

2011
[92]

The EPOCH of AI: Human-Machine Complementarities at Work, 2024

Isabella Loaiza and Roberto Rigobon. The EPOCH of AI: Human-Machine Complementarities at Work, 2024. URL https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=5028371

2024
[93]

Robots in industry: The past, present, and future of a growing collaboration with humans

Antoni Grau, Marina Indri, Lucia Lo Bello, and Thilo Sauter. Robots in industry: The past, present, and future of a growing collaboration with humans. IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine, 15(1):50–61, 2021. doi: 10.1109/MIE.2020.3008136

2021
[94]

Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Mar- kets

Daron Acemoglu and Pascual Restrepo. Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Mar- kets. Journal of Political Economy , 128(6):2188–2244, June 2020. ISSN 0022-3808, 1537-534X. doi: 10.1086/705716. URL https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10. 1086/705716

2020 doi
[95]

Newton and Lynn D

Douglas P. Newton and Lynn D. Newton. Humanoid Robots as Teachers and a Proposed Code of Practice. Frontiers in Education, 4:125, November 2019. ISSN 2504-284X. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2019.00125. URL https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/ feduc.2019.00125/full

2019
[96]

Robots are coming to the kitchen—what that could mean for society and culture

Patrick Lin. Robots are coming to the kitchen—what that could mean for society and culture. The Conversation, August 2024. URL https://theconversation.com/ robots-are-coming-to-the-kitchen-what-that-could-mean-for-society-and-culture-237000

2024
[97]

Preparing for the (Non-Existent?) Future of Work

Anton Korinek and Megan Juelfs. Preparing for the (Non-Existent?) Future of Work. In Justin B. Bullock, Yu-Che Chen, Johannes Himmelreich, Valerie M. Hudson, Anton Korinek, Matthew M. Young, and Baobao Zhang, editors, The Oxford Handbook of AI Governance, pages 746–776. Oxford...

2023
[98]

Robots, Trade, and Luddism: A Sufficient Statistic Approach to Optimal Technology Regulation

Arnaud Costinot and Iván Werning. Robots, Trade, and Luddism: A Sufficient Statistic Approach to Optimal Technology Regulation. Technical Report w25103, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, September 2018. URL http://www.nber.org/ papers/w25103.pdf

2018
[99]

Artificial Intelligence and Its Implications for Income Distri- bution and Unemployment

Anton Korinek and Joseph Stiglitz. Artificial Intelligence and Its Implications for Income Distri- bution and Unemployment. Technical Report w24174, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, December 2017. URL http://www.nber.org/papers/w24174.pdf

2017
[100]

Who Owns the Robots Rules the World

Richard Freeman. Who Owns the Robots Rules the World. Harvard Magazine , (May-June 2016), June 2016. URL https://www.harvardmagazine.com/2016/04/ who-owns-the-robots-rules-the-world

2016
[101]

Gradual Disempowerment: Systemic Existential Risks from Incremental AI Development, 2025

Jan Kulveit, Raymond Douglas, Nora Ammann, Deger Turan, David Krueger, and David Duvenaud. Gradual Disempowerment: Systemic Existential Risks from Incremental AI Development, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.16946. Version Number: 2

2025 arXiv
[102]

Buffie, and Luis-Felipe Zanna

Andrew Berg, Edward F. Buffie, and Luis-Felipe Zanna. Should we fear the robot revolution? (The correct answer is yes). Journal of Monetary Economics, 97:117–148, August 2018. ISSN 03043932. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2018.05.014. URL https://linkinghub.elsevier. com/retrieve/pii/...

2018 doi
[103]

Automation and New Tasks: How Technology Displaces and Reinstates Labor

Daron Acemoglu and Pascual Restrepo. Automation and New Tasks: How Technology Displaces and Reinstates Labor. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(2):3–30, May 2019. ISSN 0895-3309. doi: 10.1257/jep.33.2.3. URL https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/10. 1257/jep.33.2.3. Preprint. All fee...

2019 doi
[104]

Why ‘open’ AI systems are actually closed, and why this matters

David Gray Widder, Meredith Whittaker, and Sarah Myers West. Why ‘open’ AI systems are actually closed, and why this matters. Nature, 635(8040):827–833, November 2024. ISSN 0028-0836, 1476-4687. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-08141-1. URL https://www.nature. com/articles/s41586-024-08141-1

2024 doi
[105]

The Ugly Truth About Ourselves and Our Robot Creations: The Problem of Bias and Social Inequity

Ayanna Howard and Jason Borenstein. The Ugly Truth About Ourselves and Our Robot Creations: The Problem of Bias and Social Inequity. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(5): 1521–1536, October 2018. ISSN 1353-3452, 1471-5546. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9975-2. URL http://link.sprin...

2018 doi
[106]

Fairness and Bias in Robot Learning

Laura Londoño, Juana Valeria Hurtado, Nora Hertz, Philipp Kellmeyer, Silja V oeneky, and Abhinav Valada. Fairness and Bias in Robot Learning. Proceedings of the IEEE , 112(4): 305–330, April 2024. ISSN 0018-9219, 1558-2256. doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2024.3403898. URL https://ieeexplo...

2024
[107]

LLM-Driven Robots Risk Enacting Discrimination, Violence, and Unlawful Actions, June 2024

Rumaisa Azeem, Andrew Hundt, Masoumeh Mansouri, and Martim Brandão. LLM-Driven Robots Risk Enacting Discrimination, Violence, and Unlawful Actions, June 2024. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.08824. arXiv:2406.08824 [cs]

2024
[108]

Delegation, relinquishment, and responsibility: The prospect of expert robots

Jason Millar and Ian Kerr. Delegation, relinquishment, and responsibility: The prospect of expert robots. In Ryan Calo, A. Michael Froomkin, and Ian Kerr, editors, Robot Law. Edward Elgar Publishing, January 2016. ISBN 978-1-78347-673-2 978-1-78347-672-5. doi: 10.4337/97817834...

2016
[109]

Whose Robot Is It Anyway?: Liability for Artificial-Intelligence-Based Robots

Omri Rachum-Twaig. Whose Robot Is It Anyway?: Liability for Artificial-Intelligence-Based Robots. U. Ill. L. Rev., (1141), 2020

2020
[110]

Rise of the robots: technology and the threat of a jobless future

Martin Ford. Rise of the robots: technology and the threat of a jobless future. Basic Books, New York, first paperback edition edition, 2016. ISBN 978-0-465-05999-7 978-0-465-09753-1

2016
[111]

The Building Blocks of Interpretability

Chris Olah, Arvind Satyanarayan, Ian Johnson, Shan Carter, Ludwig Schubert, Katherine Ye, and Alexander Mordvintsev. The Building Blocks of Interpretability. Distill, 3(3): 10.23915/distill.00010, March 2018. ISSN 2476-0757. doi: 10.23915/distill.00010. URL https://distill.pub...

2018 doi
[112]

Trust in Robots: Challenges and Opportuni- ties

Bing Cai Kok and Harold Soh. Trust in Robots: Challenges and Opportuni- ties. Current Robotics Reports , 1(4):297–309, December 2020. ISSN 2662-4087. doi: 10.1007/s43154-020-00029-y. URL https://link.springer.com/10.1007/ s43154-020-00029-y

2020 doi
[113]

Hancock, Deborah R

Peter A. Hancock, Deborah R. Billings, Kristin E. Schaefer, Jessie Y . C. Chen, Ewart J. De Visser, and Raja Parasuraman. A Meta-Analysis of Factors Affecting Trust in Human- Robot Interaction. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 53(5):517–5...

2011 doi
[114]

Robert Jr

Connor Esterwood and Lionel P. Robert Jr. Three strikes and you are out!: The impacts of multiple human–robot trust violations and repairs on robot trustworthiness. Computers in Human Behavior , 142:107658, 2023. ISSN 0747-5632. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.chb.2023.107658....

2023
[115]

An Attachment Framework for Human-Robot Interaction

Nicholas Rabb, Theresa Law, Meia Chita-Tegmark, and Matthias Scheutz. An Attachment Framework for Human-Robot Interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics, 14(2): 539–559, March 2022. ISSN 1875-4791, 1875-4805. doi: 10.1007/s12369-021-00802-9. URL https://link.springe...

2022 doi
[116]

I, Sex Robot: the health implications of the sex robot industry

Chantal Cox-George and Susan Bewley. I, Sex Robot: the health implications of the sex robot industry. BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health, 44(3):161–164, July 2018. ISSN 2515-1991, 2515-2009. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2017-200012. URL https://jfprhc.bmj.com/lookup/ doi/10.1136/bmjsrh-2...

2018 doi
[117]

Robotic Torts, page 607–620

Alice Guerra, Francesco Parisi, Daniel Pi, and Levi Seidel. Robotic Torts, page 607–620. Cambridge Law Handbooks. Cambridge University Press, 2024. Preprint. All feedback is welcome. 24

2024
[118]

The Day ChatGPT Went Cold

Dylan Freedman. The Day ChatGPT Went Cold. The New York Times , August 2025. URL https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/19/business/ chatgpt-gpt-5-backlash-openai.html

2025
[119]

Her, December 2013

Spike Jonze. Her, December 2013

2013
[120]

The second machine age: work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies

Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee. The second machine age: work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. W. W. Norton & Company, New York London, first edition edition, 2014. ISBN 978-0-393-23935-5

2014
[121]

Toward Resisting AI-Enabled Authoritarianism

Fazl Barez, Isaac Friend, Keir Reid, Igor Krawczuk, Vincent Wang, Jakob Mökan- der, Philip Torr, Julia Morse, and Robert Trager. Toward Resisting AI-Enabled Authoritarianism. Oxford Martin School AI Governance Initiative , May 2025. URL https://aigi.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads...

2025
[122]

Robots, meaning, and self- determination

Milena Nikolova, Femke Cnossen, and Boris Nikolaev. Robots, meaning, and self- determination. Research Policy , 53(5):104987, June 2024. ISSN 00487333. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2024.104987. URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/ pii/S0048733324000362

2024
[123]

Louisa Dahmani and Véronique D. Bohbot. Habitual use of GPS negatively impacts spatial memory during self-guided navigation. Scientific Reports, 10(1):6310, April 2020. ISSN 2045-

2020
[124]

Liu, Valdemar Danry, Eunhae Lee, Samantha W

Cathy Mengying Fang, Auren R. Liu, Valdemar Danry, Eunhae Lee, Samantha W. T. Chan, Pat Pataranutaporn, Pattie Maes, Jason Phang, Michael Lampe, Lama Ahmad, and Sandhini Agarwal. How AI and Human Behaviors Shape Psychosocial Effects of Chatbot Use: A Longitudinal Randomized Co...

2025
[125]

Geistfeld

Mark A. Geistfeld. A Roadmap for Autonomous Vehicles: State Tort Liability, Automobile Insurance, and Federal Safety Regulation. 2017. doi: 10.15779/Z38416SZ9R. URL https: //lawcat.berkeley.edu/record/1127996. Publisher: California Law Review

2017
[126]

Autonomous Vehicles and Liability Law

María Lubomira Kubica. Autonomous Vehicles and Liability Law. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 70(Supplement_1):i39–i69, October 2022. ISSN 0002-919X, 2326-

2022
[127]

10), May 2024

Automated Vehicles Act 2024 (c. 10), May 2024. URL https://www.legislation.gov. uk/ukpga/2024/10/contents

2024
[128]

Liability for Automated and Autonomous Driving in Germany

Benjamin V on Bodungen and Hans Steege. Liability for Automated and Autonomous Driving in Germany. In Hans Steege, Ilaria Amelia Caggiano, Maria Cristina Gaeta, and Benjamin V on Bodungen, editors, Autonomous Vehicles and Civil Liability in a Global Perspective , volume 3, pag...

2024 doi
[129]

Technical Report NHTSA-2024-0100, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Department of Transportation (DOT), December 2024

ADS-equipped Vehicle Safety, Transparency, and Evaluation Program. Technical Report NHTSA-2024-0100, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Department of Transportation (DOT), December 2024. URL https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa. gov/files/2024-12/nprm-av-step...

2024
[130]

Risk management framework for information systems and organizations: a system life cycle approach for security and privacy

Joint Task Force Transformation Initiative. Risk management framework for information systems and organizations: a system life cycle approach for security and privacy. Technical Report NIST SP 800-37r2, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, December...

2018
[131]

Regulating Autonomy in Civilian Drones: Towards a Spectral Approach

Samar Abbas Nawaz. Regulating Autonomy in Civilian Drones: Towards a Spectral Approach. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems , 110(2):46, March 2024. ISSN 1573-0409. doi: 10.1007/s10846-024-02056-9. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-024-02056-9

2024 doi
[132]

Ross Boyd and Robert J. Holton. Technology, innovation, employment and power: Does robotics and artificial intelligence really mean social transformation? Journal of Sociology, 54 (3):331–345, September 2018. ISSN 1440-7833, 1741-2978. doi: 10.1177/1440783317726591. URL https:...

2018 doi
[133]

URL https://regulatorylibrary.caa.co.uk/ 2019-947-pdf/PDF.pdf

UAS Regulation, July 2025. URL https://regulatorylibrary.caa.co.uk/ 2019-947-pdf/PDF.pdf

2025
[134]

URLhttps://www.whitehouse.gov/ presidential-actions/2025/06/unleashing-american-drone-dominance/

Unleashing American Drone Dominance, June 2025. URLhttps://www.whitehouse.gov/ presidential-actions/2025/06/unleashing-american-drone-dominance/

2025
[135]

URLhttps://www.ecfr

Part 89—Remote Identification of Unmanned Aircraft, April 2021. URLhttps://www.ecfr. gov/current/title-14/part-89

2021
[136]

Technical Report CAP 3105, Civil Aviation Authority, May 2025

Review of UK Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Regulations: Consultation Reply Document. Technical Report CAP 3105, Civil Aviation Authority, May 2025. URL https://www.caa. co.uk/our-work/publications/documents/content/cap3105/

2025
[137]

URL https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/ reg/2023/1230/oj/eng

Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2023 on machinery and repealing Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Directive 73/361/EEC, June 2023. URL https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/ reg/2023/1230/oj/eng

2023
[138]

Smart Robotics in the EU Legal Framework: The Role of the Machinery Regulation

Tobias Mahler. Smart Robotics in the EU Legal Framework: The Role of the Machinery Regulation. Oslo Law Review, 11(1):1–18, October 2024. ISSN 2387-3299. doi: 10.18261/olr. 11.1.5. URL https://www.scup.com/doi/10.18261/olr.11.1.5. Preprint. All feedback is welcome. 26

2024 doi
[139]

URL https://www

Robotics — Safety requirements for industrial robots, February 2025. URL https://www. iso.org/standard/73933.html

2025
[140]

URL https://www.iso.org/ standard/83498.html

Robotics — Safety requirements for service robots, 2025. URL https://www.iso.org/ standard/83498.html

2025
[141]

URL https://eur-lex

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/947, May 2019. URL https://eur-lex. europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2019/947/oj/eng

2019
[142]

URL https://unece.org/transport/documents/2021/03/standards/ un-regulation-no-155-cyber-security-and-cyber-security

Cyber security and cyber security management system, April 2021. URL https://unece.org/transport/documents/2021/03/standards/ un-regulation-no-155-cyber-security-and-cyber-security

2021
[143]

Risk-Guided Diffusion: Toward Deploying Robot Foundation Models in Space, Where Failure Is Not An Option, June 2025

Rohan Thakker, Adarsh Patnaik, Vince Kurtz, Jonas Frey, Jonathan Becktor, Sangwoo Moon, Rob Royce, Marcel Kaufmann, Georgios Georgakis, Pascal Roth, Joel Burdick, Marco Hutter, and Shehryar Khattak. Risk-Guided Diffusion: Toward Deploying Robot Foundation Models in Space, Wher...

2025 arXiv
[144]

URL https://eur-lex.europa.eu/ legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32024R1689

Artificial Intelligence Act, June 2024. URL https://eur-lex.europa.eu/ legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32024R1689

2024
[145]

Robots in public spaces: implications for policy design

Michael Mintrom, Shanti Sumartojo, Dana Kuli ´c, Leimin Tian, Pamela Carreno-Medrano, and Aimee Allen and. Robots in public spaces: implications for policy design. Policy Design and Practice , 5(2):123–139, 2022. doi: 10.1080/25741292.2021.1905342. URL https://doi.org/10.1080/...

2022
[146]

Regulation (eu) 2016/679 of the european parliament and of the council of 27 april 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing directive 95/46/ec (general data protection regulati...

2016
[147]

In Woodrow Barfield, Yueh- Hsuan Weng, Ugo Pagallo, and Kristen Thomasen, editors, The Cambridge handbook on the law, policy, and regulation of human-robot interaction, pages 84–99

Robots, Regulation, and the Changing Nature of Public Space. In Woodrow Barfield, Yueh- Hsuan Weng, Ugo Pagallo, and Kristen Thomasen, editors, The Cambridge handbook on the law, policy, and regulation of human-robot interaction, pages 84–99. Cambridge University Press, Cambri...

2024
[148]

URL https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ ukpga/1996/18/introduction

Employment Rights Act 1996, May 1996. URL https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ ukpga/1996/18/introduction

1996
[149]

URL https://uscode

Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification, August 1988. URL https://uscode. house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title29/chapter23&edition=prelim

1988
[150]

URL https://www.iso.org/ standard/70918.html

Road vehicles — Cybersecurity engineering, August 2021. URL https://www.iso.org/ standard/70918.html

2021
[151]

Schumpeter

Joseph A. Schumpeter. Capitalism, socialism and democracy . Harper Perennial Modern Thought, New York, third and final edition edition, 2008. ISBN 978-0-06-156161-0

2008
[152]

Forging A New AGI Social Contract

Deric Cheng. Forging A New AGI Social Contract. Technical report, AGI So- cial Contract, April 2025. URL https://www.agisocialcontract.org/anthology/ forging-a-new-agi-social-contract

2025
[153]

Artificial Intelligence, Rationalization, and the Limits of Control in the Public Sector: The Case of Tax Policy Optimization

Jakob Mökander and Ralph Schroeder. Artificial Intelligence, Rationalization, and the Limits of Control in the Public Sector: The Case of Tax Policy Optimization. Social Science Computer Review, 42(6):1359–1378, December 2024. ISSN 0894-4393, 1552-8286. doi: 10.1177/0894439324...

2024 doi
[154]

Hadfield, and Markus Anderljung

Alan Chan, Kevin Wei, Sihao Huang, Nitarshan Rajkumar, Elija Perrier, Seth Lazar, Gillian K. Hadfield, and Markus Anderljung. Infrastructure for AI Agents, January 2025. URL http: //arxiv.org/abs/2501.10114. arXiv:2501.10114 [cs]. Preprint. All feedback is welcome. 27

2025 arXiv
[155]

Authenticated Delegation and Authorized AI Agents, January 2025

Tobin South, Samuele Marro, Thomas Hardjono, Robert Mahari, Cedric Deslandes Whitney, Dazza Greenwood, Alan Chan, and Alex Pentland. Authenticated Delegation and Authorized AI Agents, January 2025. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.09674. arXiv:2501.09674 [cs]

2025 arXiv
[156]

IEEE Std 7001-2021, pages 1–54,

Ieee standard for transparency of autonomous systems. IEEE Std 7001-2021, pages 1–54,

2021
[157]

Ieee p7003tm standard for algorithmic bias considerations

Ansgar Koene, Liz Dowthwaite, and Suchana Seth. Ieee p7003tm standard for algorithmic bias considerations. In 2018 IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Software Fairness (FairWare), pages 38–41, 2018. doi: 10.23919/FAIRW ARE.2018.8452919

2018
[158]

Daniel Schiff, Aladdin Ayesh, Laura Musikanski, and John C. Havens. Ieee 7010: A new standard for assessing the well-being implications of artificial intelligence. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), pages 2746–2753, 2020. doi: 10.1109...

2020
[159]

With Port Strike Averted, Dockworkers Draw New Curbs on Automa- tion

Paul Berger. With Port Strike Averted, Dockworkers Draw New Curbs on Automa- tion. The Wall Street Journal , January 2025. URL https://www.wsj.com/articles/ with-port-strike-averted-dockworkers-draw-new-curbs-on-automation-97938142

2025
[160]

Safe beyond sale: post-deployment monitoring of AI

Connor Dunlop and Merlin Stein. Safe beyond sale: post-deployment monitoring of AI. Techni- cal report, Ada Lovelace Institute, June 2024. URLhttps://www.adalovelaceinstitute. org/blog/post-deployment-monitoring-of-ai/

2024
[161]

Roadmap for cybersecurity in autonomous vehicles

Vipin Kumar Kukkala, Sooryaa Vignesh Thiruloga, and Sudeep Pasricha. Roadmap for cybersecurity in autonomous vehicles. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, 11(6):13–23,
[162]

Who Should Be Responsible for Operational Oversight of AI Agents? May 2025

Yohan Mathew, Janvi Ahuja, Amin Oueslati, and Atoosa Kasirzadeh. Who Should Be Responsible for Operational Oversight of AI Agents? May 2025. Forthcoming

2025
[163]

The Missing Institution: A Global Dividend System for the Age of AI

Anna Yelizarova. The Missing Institution: A Global Dividend System for the Age of AI. Technical report, AGI Social Contract, May 2025. URLhttps://www.agisocialcontract. org/anthology/windfall

2025
[164]

Inclusive Growth in the Era of Automation and AI: How Can Taxation Help? Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence , 5:867832, May 2022

Rossana Merola. Inclusive Growth in the Era of Automation and AI: How Can Taxation Help? Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence , 5:867832, May 2022. ISSN 2624-8212. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.867832. URL https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/ frai.2022.867832/full

2022
[165]

Mitigating emotional risks in human-social robot interactions through virtual interactive environment indication

Aorigele Bao, Yi Zeng, and Enmeng Lu. Mitigating emotional risks in human-social robot interactions through virtual interactive environment indication. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications , 10(1):638, October 2023. ISSN 2662-9992. doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-02143-6. URL...

2023 doi
[166]

doi: 10.1109/IEEESTD.2022.9726144

2022
[167]

Formal Methods for Security Knowledge Area

David Basin. Formal Methods for Security Knowledge Area. Technical Report Version 1.0.0, ETH Zurich, July 2021. URL https://www.cybok.org/media/downloads/Formal_ Methods_for_Security_v1.0.0.pdf

2021
[168]

Safety by Measurement: A Systematic Literature Review of AI Safety Evaluation Methods, 2025

Markov Grey and Charbel-Raphaël Segerie. Safety by Measurement: A Systematic Literature Review of AI Safety Evaluation Methods, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2505. 05541. Version Number: 1

2025
[169]

Technical report, Frontier Model Forum, December

Preliminary Taxonomy of Pre-Deployment Frontier AI Safety Eval- uations. Technical report, Frontier Model Forum, December
[170]

URL https://www.frontiermodelforum.org/updates/ issue-brief-preliminary-taxonomy-of-pre-deployment-frontier-ai-safety-evaluations/
[171]

RoboArena: Distributed Real-World Evaluation of Generalist Robot Policies, June

Pranav Atreya, Karl Pertsch, Tony Lee, Moo Jin Kim, Arhan Jain, Artur Kuramshin, Clemens Eppner, Cyrus Neary, Edward Hu, Fabio Ramos, Jonathan Tremblay, Kanav Arora, Kirsty Ellis, Luca Macesanu, Matthew Leonard, Meedeum Cho, Ozgur Aslan, Shivin Dass, Jie Wang, Xingfang Yuan, X...
[172]

Navigating the AI Frontier: A Primer on the Evolution and Impact of AI Agents

Benjamin Larsen, Cathy Li, Stephanie Teeuwen, Oliver Denti, Jason DePerro, and Efi Raili. Navigating the AI Frontier: A Primer on the Evolution and Impact of AI Agents. Technical report, World Economic Forum, December 2024. URL https://reports.weforum.org/ docs/WEF_Navigating_...

2024
[173]

doi: 10.1109/MCE.2022.3154346

2022
[174]

A Survey of Zero-Knowledge Proof Based Verifiable Machine Learning, February 2025

Zhizhi Peng, Taotao Wang, Chonghe Zhao, Guofu Liao, Zibin Lin, Yifeng Liu, Bin Cao, Long Shi, Qing Yang, and Shengli Zhang. A Survey of Zero-Knowledge Proof Based Verifiable Machine Learning, February 2025. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.18535. arXiv:2502.18535 [cs]

2025 arXiv
[175]

Emerging Practices in Fron- tier AI Safety Frameworks, February 2025

Marie Davidsen Buhl, Ben Bucknall, and Tammy Masterson. Emerging Practices in Fron- tier AI Safety Frameworks, February 2025. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.04746. arXiv:2503.04746 [cs]

2025 arXiv
[176]

Auditing of AI: Legal, Ethical and Technical Approaches

Jakob Mökander. Auditing of AI: Legal, Ethical and Technical Approaches. Digital Society, 2 (3):49, December 2023. ISSN 2731-4650, 2731-4669. doi: 10.1007/s44206-023-00074-y. URL https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s44206-023-00074-y

2023 doi
[177]

Safeguarded AI: constructing guaranteed safety

David Dalrymple. Safeguarded AI: constructing guaranteed safety. Technical Report 1.2, Advanced Research and Invention Agency, 2024. URLhttps://www.aria.org.uk/media/ 3nhijno4/aria-safeguarded-ai-programme-thesis-v1.pdf

2024
[178]

Introducing def/acc at EF

Matt Clifford. Introducing def/acc at EF. Technical report, Entrepreneurs First, May 2024. URL https://www.joinef.com/posts/introducing-def-acc-at-ef/

2024
[179]

Can we standardise the frontier of AI?, 2025

Huw Roberts and Marta Ziosi. Can we standardise the frontier of AI?, 2025. URL https: //www.ssrn.com/abstract=5271446

2025
[180]

URL https: //store.astm.org/e2566_e2566m-24.html

Standard Test Method for Evaluating Response Robot Sensing: Visual Acuity. URL https: //store.astm.org/e2566_e2566m-24.html
[181]

SafeAgentBench: A Benchmark for Safe Task Planning of Embodied LLM Agents, March 2025

Sheng Yin, Xianghe Pang, Yuanzhuo Ding, Menglan Chen, Yutong Bi, Yichen Xiong, Wenhao Huang, Zhen Xiang, Jing Shao, and Siheng Chen. SafeAgentBench: A Benchmark for Safe Task Planning of Embodied LLM Agents, March 2025. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/ 2412.13178. arXiv:2412.13178 [c...

2025
[182]

LoTa-Bench: Benchmarking Language-oriented Task Planners for Embodied Agents, February 2024

Jae-Woo Choi, Youngwoo Yoon, Hyobin Ong, Jaehong Kim, and Minsu Jang. LoTa-Bench: Benchmarking Language-oriented Task Planners for Embodied Agents, February 2024. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.08178. arXiv:2402.08178 [cs]

2024 arXiv
[183]

Curtis E. A. Karnow. The application of traditional tort theory to embodied machine in- telligence. In Ryan Calo, A. Michael Froomkin, and Ian Kerr, editors, Robot Law. Ed- ward Elgar Publishing, January 2016. ISBN 978-1-78347-673-2 978-1-78347-672-5. doi: Preprint. All feedba...

2016
[184]

arXiv:2506.18123 [cs]

URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.18123. arXiv:2506.18123 [cs]
[185]

Governing AI Agents, February 2025

Noam Kolt. Governing AI Agents, February 2025. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2501. 07913. arXiv:2501.07913 [cs]

2025 arXiv
[186]

Lewis Hammond, Alan Chan, Jesse Clifton, Jason Hoelscher-Obermaier, Akbir Khan, Euan McLean, Chandler Smith, Wolfram Barfuss, Jakob Foerster, Tomáš Gaven ˇciak, The Anh Han, Edward Hughes, V ojtˇech Kovaˇrík, Jan Kulveit, Joel Z. Leibo, Caspar Oesterheld, Chris- tian Schroeder...

2025 arXiv
[187]

OpenAI’s Sam Altman has a new idea for a universal basic income

Lakshmi Varanasi and Kenneth Niemeyer. OpenAI’s Sam Altman has a new idea for a universal basic income. Business Insider, May 2024. URL https://www.businessinsider.com/ openai-sam-altman-universal-basic-income-idea-compute-gpt-7-2024-5

2024
[188]

AI labor displacement and the limits of worker retraining

Julian Jacobs. AI labor displacement and the limits of worker retraining. Technical re- port, Brookings Institute, May 2025. URL https://www.brookings.edu/articles/ ai-labor-displacement-and-the-limits-of-worker-retraining/

2025
[189]

Optimal Taxation of Robots

Uwe Thuemmel. Optimal Taxation of Robots. Journal of the European Economic Association, 21(3):1154–1190, June 2023. ISSN 1542-4766, 1542-4774. doi: 10.1093/jeea/jvac062. URL https://academic.oup.com/jeea/article/21/3/1154/6798383

2023 doi
[190]

Navigating the future of work: A case for a robot tax in the age of AI

Michael J Ahn. Navigating the future of work: A case for a robot tax in the age of AI. Brookings Institute, May 2024. URL https://www.brookings.edu/articles/ navigating-the-future-of-work-a-case-for-a-robot-tax-in-the-age-of-ai/

2024
[191]

URL https://www.iso.org/standard/91469.html

ISO/AWI 25785-1, May 2025. URL https://www.iso.org/standard/91469.html

2025
[192]

Reuters, February 2025

China mandates regulatory approvals for autonomous driving software upgrades. Reuters, February 2025. URL https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/ china-mandates-regulatory-approvals-autonomous-driving-software-upgrades-2025-02-28/

2025
[193]

Reuters, April 2025

China bans ’smart’ and ’autonomous’ driving terms from vehicle ads. Reuters, April 2025. URL https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/ china-bans-smart-autonomous-driving-terms-vehicle-ads-2025-04-17/

2025
[194]

Castillo, and Dylan Khor

Bowen Weng, Linda Capito, Guillermo A. Castillo, and Dylan Khor. Rethink Repeatable Measures of Robot Performance with Statistical Query, May 2025. URL http://arxiv. org/abs/2505.08216. arXiv:2505.08216 [cs]

2025
[195]

Establishing Standards for Embodied AI, July 2024

Shaoshan Liu. Establishing Standards for Embodied AI, July 2024. URL https://cacm. acm.org/blogcacm/establishing-standards-for-embodied-ai/

2024
[196]

Apple is turning privacy into a business advantage, not just a marketing slogan

Kif Leswing. Apple is turning privacy into a business advantage, not just a marketing slogan. CNBC. URL https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/07/ apple-is-turning-privacy-into-a-business-advantage.html

2021
[197]

White and Seth D

Trevor N. White and Seth D. Baum. 66liability for present and future robotics technology. In Robot Ethics 2.0: From Autonomous Cars to Artificial Intelligence . Oxford University Press, 11 2017. ISBN 9780190652951. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780190652951.003.0005. URL https://doi.org/1...

2017
[198]

A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning

Ninareh Mehrabi, Fred Morstatter, Nripsuta Saxena, Kristina Lerman, and Aram Galstyan. A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6):1–35, July
[199]

The Windfall Clause: Distributing the Benefits of AI for the Common Good, January 2020

Cullen O’Keefe, Peter Cihon, Ben Garfinkel, Carrick Flynn, Jade Leung, and Allan Dafoe. The Windfall Clause: Distributing the Benefits of AI for the Common Good, January 2020. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1912.11595. arXiv:1912.11595 [cs]

2020 arXiv
[200]

Edge robotics: are we ready? an experimental evaluation of current vision and future directions

Milan Groshev, Gabriele Baldoni, Luca Cominardi, Antonio De La Oliva, and Robert Gazda. Edge robotics: are we ready? an experimental evaluation of current vision and future directions. Digital Communications and Networks, 9(1):166–174, February 2023. ISSN 23528648. doi: 10.101...

2023 doi
[201]

The Developments and Challenges towards Dexterous and Embodied Robotic Manipulation: A Survey, July 2025

Gaofeng Li, Ruize Wang, Peisen Xu, Qi Ye, and Jiming Chen. The Developments and Challenges towards Dexterous and Embodied Robotic Manipulation: A Survey, July 2025. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.11840. arXiv:2507.11840 [cs]

2025
[202]

Taxonomy of Risks posed by Language Models

Laura Weidinger, Jonathan Uesato, Maribeth Rauh, Conor Griffin, Po-Sen Huang, John Mellor, Amelia Glaese, Myra Cheng, Borja Balle, Atoosa Kasirzadeh, Courtney Biles, Sasha Brown, Zac Kenton, Will Hawkins, Tom Stepleton, Abeba Birhane, Lisa Anne Hendricks, Laura Rimell, William...

2022
[203]

The Rights and Wrongs of Robot Care

Noel Sharkey and Amanda Sharkey. The Rights and Wrongs of Robot Care. In Patrick Lin, Keith Abney, and George A. Bekey, editors,Robot ethics: the ethical and social implications of robotics, Intelligent robotics and autonomous agents, pages 267–282. The MIT Press, Cambridge, M...

2012
[204]

Taxing the Robots

Orly Mazur. Taxing the Robots. Pepperdine Law Review , 46(277-330), 2019. URL https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article= 2493&context=plr

2019
[207]

Chinasa T. Okolo. Re-envisioning AI safety through global majority per- spectives, February 2025. URL https://www.brookings.edu/articles/ a-new-writing-series-re-envisioning-ai-safety-through-global-majority-perspectives/

2025
[208]

Ukraine Says It Unleashed 117 Drones in an Attack on Russia: What to Know

Maria Varenikova, Anastasia Kuznietsova, Nataliya Vasilyeva, Marc Santora, Devon Lum, and Ephrat Livni. Ukraine Says It Unleashed 117 Drones in an Attack on Russia: What to Know. The New York Times, June 2025. URL https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/02/world/ europe/ukraine-russia...

2025
[210]

Ross Gruetzemacher, Shahar Avin, James Fox, and Alexander K. Saeri. Strategic insights from simulation gaming of ai race dynamics. Futures, 167:103563, 2025. ISSN 0016-3287. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2025.103563. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/...

2025
[212]

doi: 10.1145/3457607

ISSN 0360-0300, 1557-7341. doi: 10.1145/3457607. URL https://dl.acm.org/ doi/10.1145/3457607. Publisher: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). Preprint. All feedback is welcome. 30

doi
[213]

Robots need better batteries

Jeff Hecht. Robots need better batteries. Nature, pages d41586–023–02170–y, June 2023. ISSN 0028-0836, 1476-4687. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-02170-y. URL https://www. nature.com/articles/d41586-023-02170-y

2023 doi
[218]

Autonomous Vehicle Security: A Deep Dive into Threat Modeling, December 2024

Amal Yousseef, Shalaka Satam, Banafsheh Saber Latibari, Jesus Pacheco, Soheil Salehi, Salim Hariri, and Partik Satam. Autonomous Vehicle Security: A Deep Dive into Threat Modeling, December 2024. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.15348. arXiv:2412.15348 [eess]. Preprint. All feedb...

2024 arXiv
[2022]

URL https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/12/19/1065306/ roomba-irobot-robot-vacuums-artificial-intelligence-training-data-privacy/

2022
[2024]

doi: 10.1007/s43681-023-00289-2

ISSN 2730-5953, 2730-5961. doi: 10.1007/s43681-023-00289-2. URL https: //link.springer.com/10.1007/s43681-023-00289-2

doi
[2025]

arXiv:2310.08864 [cs]

URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.08864. arXiv:2310.08864 [cs]

arXiv
[2322]

URL https://www.nature.com/articles/ s41598-020-62877-0

doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62877-0. URL https://www.nature.com/articles/ s41598-020-62877-0 . Preprint. All feedback is welcome. 25

doi
[4805]

URL https://link.springer.com/10.1007/ s12369-023-01027-8

doi: 10.1007/s12369-023-01027-8. URL https://link.springer.com/10.1007/ s12369-023-01027-8

doi
[8439]

URL http://link.springer.com/10.1007/ s10676-019-09520-3

doi: 10.1007/s10676-019-09520-3. URL http://link.springer.com/10.1007/ s10676-019-09520-3

doi
[9197]

URL https://academic.oup.com/ajcl/article/70/ Supplement_1/i39/6655619

doi: 10.1093/ajcl/avac015. URL https://academic.oup.com/ajcl/article/70/ Supplement_1/i39/6655619

doi
[9476]

URL https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/ scirobotics.aea7897

doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.aea7897. URL https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/ scirobotics.aea7897. Preprint. All feedback is welcome. 18

doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

A call for embodied AI, September 2024

Giuseppe Paolo, Jonas Gonzalez-Billandon, and Balázs Kégl. A call for embodied AI, September 2024. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.03824. arXiv:2402.03824 [cs]

arXiv 2024

[2] [2]

Aligning Cyber Space with Physical World: A Comprehensive Survey on Embodied AI, August 2024

Yang Liu, Weixing Chen, Yongjie Bai, Xiaodan Liang, Guanbin Li, Wen Gao, and Liang Lin. Aligning Cyber Space with Physical World: A Comprehensive Survey on Embodied AI, August 2024. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.06886. arXiv:2407.06886 [cs]

arXiv 2024

[3] [3]

Drone- Aided Delivery Methods, Challenge, and the Future: A Methodological Review

Xueping Li, Jose Tupayachi, Aliza Sharmin, and Madelaine Martinez Ferguson. Drone- Aided Delivery Methods, Challenge, and the Future: A Methodological Review. Drones, 7(3):191, March 2023. ISSN 2504-446X. doi: 10.3390/drones7030191. URL https: //www.mdpi.com/2504-446X/7/3/191

work page doi:10.3390/drones7030191 2023

[4] [4]

Chinese researchers develop amphibious spherical robot assisting in po- lice patrol in E.China’s Zhejiang

Du Qiongfang. Chinese researchers develop amphibious spherical robot assisting in po- lice patrol in E.China’s Zhejiang. Global Times, December 2024. URL https://www. globaltimes.cn/page/202412/1324773.shtml

2024

[5] [5]

AI robots may hold key to nursing Japan’s ageing population

Kiyoshi Takenaka. AI robots may hold key to nursing Japan’s ageing population. Reuters, February 2025. URL https: //www.reuters.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/ ai-robots-may-hold-key-nursing-japans-ageing-population-2025-02-28/

2025

[6] [6]

AI robots are helping South Korea’s seniors feel less alone

Michelle Kim. AI robots are helping South Korea’s seniors feel less alone. Rest of World , August 2025. URL https://restofworld.org/2025/ korea-ai-robot-senior-care-hyodol/?utm_source=linkedin&utm_medium= social&utm_campaign=row-social

2025

[7] [7]

The rise of ai robots: Physical ai is coming for you

Rob Garlick, Wenyan Fei, Tahmid Quddus Islam, Anjola Odunsi, Adam Spielman, Martin Wilkie, Helen Krause, Matthew Moffat, Carol Gibson, Alex Miller, and Anuj Gangahar. The rise of ai robots: Physical ai is coming for you. Technical report, Citi GPS: Global Perspectives & Solutions, December 2024. URL https://ir. citi.com/gps/H558-XNr_iTlGa7Qq7H9AYb5ZT2W851...

2024

[8] [8]

The coming wave: Technology, Power, and the Twenty-First Century’s Greatest Dilemma

Mustafa Suleyman and Michael Bhaskar. The coming wave: Technology, Power, and the Twenty-First Century’s Greatest Dilemma. Crown, New York, 2023. ISBN 978-0-593-59395-0 978-0-593-72817-8

2023