pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.19773 · v1 · pith:TQOVOAQKnew · submitted 2026-06-18 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th

Polarization-Dependent Photon Propagation, Quasinormal Modes, and Gravitational Lensing in Higher-Curvature Effective Theories

Takamasa Kanai This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 17:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-th
keywords higher-curvature correctionspolarization-dependent photon propagationquasinormal modesgravitational lensingeffective field theorySchwarzschild spacetimeReissner-Nordström spacetimeeffective metric
0
0 comments X

The pith

Higher-curvature corrections make photon propagation polarization-dependent, shifting quasinormal modes and lensing observables in black hole spacetimes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates how higher-curvature terms in an effective field theory alter photon trajectories in a polarization-dependent manner inside Schwarzschild and Reissner-Nordström geometries. It derives an effective metric for photon propagation under the geometrical optics approximation and shows that this metric changes the photon sphere radius differently for each polarization. The altered photon sphere then determines polarization-specific corrections to the eikonal quasinormal mode spectrum and to the deflection angle in strong gravitational lensing. The results indicate that these shifts could be used to place constraints on the coefficients of the effective theory through gravitational-wave or lensing observations.

Core claim

Higher-curvature corrections induce a polarization-dependent effective metric for photon propagation. In static spherically symmetric backgrounds, this metric shifts the photon sphere, which determines the eikonal quasinormal mode frequencies and damping times differently for each polarization and modifies the deflection angle in gravitational lensing.

What carries the argument

Polarization-dependent effective metric for photons derived from higher-curvature terms under the geometrical optics approximation.

If this is right

  • Photon sphere radii differ between the two polarization modes.
  • Eikonal quasinormal modes acquire polarization-dependent frequency and damping shifts.
  • The deflection angle for strongly lensed light rays becomes polarization-dependent.
  • Beyond-general-relativity contributions appear simultaneously in quasinormal-mode spectra and strong-lensing observables.
  • The size of the shifts can be used to constrain the higher-curvature coefficients in the effective theory.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Polarized gravitational-wave ringdown or resolved lensing images could distinguish among different higher-curvature operators.
  • The same effective-metric construction may be applied to stationary, axisymmetric spacetimes to test consistency with rotating black holes.
  • The approach supplies a direct map from effective-field-theory parameters to strong-field observables without solving the complete wave equation.

Load-bearing premise

The geometrical optics approximation remains valid for the polarization-dependent effective metric, so the photon sphere, eikonal quasinormal modes, and deflection angle can be computed directly from that metric.

What would settle it

Numerical solution of the full wave equation for a specific higher-curvature theory at large angular momentum, checked against the analytic eikonal prediction obtained from the effective metric.

read the original abstract

We investigate the impact of higher-curvature corrections on photon propagation within an effective field theory framework and explore their observational consequences in strong gravitational fields. In particular, we consider polarization-dependent modifications to photon trajectories induced by higher-order curvature terms and analyze their effects in static and spherically symmetric spacetimes, focusing on Schwarzschild and Reissner-Nordstr\"om backgrounds. Using the geometrical optics approximation, we derive the effective metric governing photon propagation and study the resulting shifts in the photon sphere. Based on this modified propagation, we compute the quasinormal modes in the eikonal limit and examine their dependence on the polarization modes. We further analyze gravitational lensing observables, focusing on the deflection angle, incorporating the polarization-dependent corrections. Our results clarify how contributions from beyond-general-relativity effects manifest in both quasinormal mode spectra and strong gravitational lensing observables. These findings further suggest the possibility of placing meaningful constraints on effective field theories.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that higher-curvature corrections in an effective field theory induce polarization-dependent modifications to photon propagation. In static spherically symmetric backgrounds (Schwarzschild and Reissner-Nordström), the geometrical optics approximation is used to obtain an effective metric; this metric is then employed to compute shifts in the photon sphere, polarization-dependent quasinormal modes in the eikonal limit, and corrections to the strong-lensing deflection angle. The authors conclude that these beyond-GR effects appear in QNM spectra and lensing observables and may allow constraints on the underlying EFT.

Significance. If the results hold, the work supplies a concrete translation of higher-curvature EFT terms into polarization-sensitive observables in strong gravity, offering a possible route to confront such theories with black-hole ringdown and lensing data.

major comments (2)
  1. [Geometrical optics derivation and effective-metric section] The derivation of the effective metric and all subsequent results rest on the assumption that the geometrical optics approximation remains valid for the polarization-dependent metric near the photon sphere. No estimate is given for the magnitude of neglected higher-order wave corrections relative to the leading ray term, nor is a consistency condition derived that would guarantee the approximation inside the EFT cutoff. This assumption is load-bearing for the photon-sphere location, eikonal QNMs, and deflection-angle claims.
  2. [Eikonal quasinormal-mode section] In the eikonal-QNM computation, the polarization dependence is read off from the effective metric without an explicit check that the higher-derivative operators do not generate O(1) corrections to the transport or dispersion relation at the photon sphere. A quantitative bound on the size of these corrections is required to support the reported polarization-dependent frequency shifts.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract would be strengthened by a one-sentence statement of the specific higher-curvature Lagrangian terms under consideration.
  2. [Notation and definitions] Notation for the components of the effective metric should be checked for consistency between the derivation and the lensing and QNM sections.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed review and valuable feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below. We agree that additional justification for the approximations is warranted and will revise the manuscript to include the requested estimates and consistency conditions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Geometrical optics derivation and effective-metric section] The derivation of the effective metric and all subsequent results rest on the assumption that the geometrical optics approximation remains valid for the polarization-dependent metric near the photon sphere. No estimate is given for the magnitude of neglected higher-order wave corrections relative to the leading ray term, nor is a consistency condition derived that would guarantee the approximation inside the EFT cutoff. This assumption is load-bearing for the photon-sphere location, eikonal QNMs, and deflection-angle claims.

    Authors: We acknowledge the importance of rigorously justifying the geometrical optics approximation in the context of the effective field theory. While the standard geometrical optics limit is taken with high-frequency waves, the higher-curvature terms introduce an additional scale. In the revised manuscript, we will provide an order-of-magnitude estimate for the neglected wave corrections, demonstrating that they remain small compared to the leading terms when the EFT cutoff is sufficiently high relative to the curvature at the photon sphere. We will also derive a consistency condition ensuring the approximation holds within the EFT validity regime. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Eikonal quasinormal-mode section] In the eikonal-QNM computation, the polarization dependence is read off from the effective metric without an explicit check that the higher-derivative operators do not generate O(1) corrections to the transport or dispersion relation at the photon sphere. A quantitative bound on the size of these corrections is required to support the reported polarization-dependent frequency shifts.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit quantitative bound is necessary to confirm that higher-derivative operators do not introduce significant corrections at the photon sphere. In the revision, we will include an analysis showing that such corrections are suppressed by factors of (curvature scale / EFT cutoff)^n for appropriate n, ensuring they are negligible in the regime considered. This will support the validity of reading the polarization dependence directly from the effective metric. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper derives an effective metric for photon propagation from higher-curvature EFT terms, then applies the standard geometrical optics approximation and eikonal limit to extract photon-sphere locations, polarization-dependent QNMs, and deflection angles. No quoted equations or steps reduce by construction to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or load-bearing self-citations; the central claims rest on explicit derivations from the modified metric using conventional methods. The derivation is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review is based solely on the abstract; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5698 in / 1178 out tokens · 21545 ms · 2026-06-26T17:01:22.910063+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 23 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Schwarzschild (PPL and PPM) The components of the effective metric are given as follows. a(r) =− 2M r − 1 r10 64ηM 3(22M−16r)−40γM 3r3 ∼ − 2M r + 8M3 r9 128η+ 5γr 2 ,(81) b(r) = 2M r + 24M2r (r−2M) 2 1072ηM 2 3r9 − 192ηM r8 + 49γM 3r6 − 9γ r5 ∼ 2M r − 24M2 r9 192ηM+ 9γr 3 ,(82) c(r) = 24sλM r3 ,(83) which will be employed in the subsequent analysis. Subst...

  2. [2]

    Reissner–Nordstr¨ om (PPL) The components of the effective metric are given as follows. a(r) = 2M r + Q2 4πr2 − Q2(Q2(2α+β) + 4πγ(Q 2 −20πr(M−r)) 1280π4r6 + (2α+β)Q 2(Q2 + 4πr(−2M+r)) 4π3r6 ∼ − 2M r + (2α+β)Q 2 π2r4 − γQ2 16π2r4 ,(86) 17 b(r) = 2M r − Q2 4πr2 + 1 80π2r2 Q2 + 4πr(−2M+r) 2 h Q2(Q2 2α+β) + 16πγ(4Q 2 + 5πr(−7M+ 4r)) + 320πQ2(2α+β)(Q 2 + 4πr(−...

  3. [3]

    Reissner–Nordstr¨ om (PPM) The components of the effective metric are given as follows. a(r) =− 2M r + Q2 4πr2 − Q2(Q2(2α+β) + 4πγ(Q 2 −20πr(M−r)) 1280π4r6 + βQ2(Q2 + 4πr(−2M+r)) 8π3r6 ∼ − 2M r − αQ4 640π4r6 + βQ2 2π2r4 − Q2γ 16π2r4 ,(91) b(r) = 2M r − Q2 4πr2 + 1 80π2r2 Q2 + 4πr(−2M+r) 2 h Q2(Q2 2α+β) + 16πγ(4Q 2 + 5πr(−7M+ 4r)) + 160πQ2β(Q2 + 4πr(−2M+r)...

  4. [4]

    (125) We then determine the strong deflection limit coefficients together with the photon surface quantities

    + 5 log(3 + √ 3) i . (125) We then determine the strong deflection limit coefficients together with the photon surface quantities. These are found to be βph = 1− 64(7808η+ 910γ−6561sλ) 19683 ,(126) ¯a= 1 + 57344η 2187 + 128γ 81 − 112sλ 9 ,(127) bD = log 4 + 32 (256η(31 + 42 log 2) + 216γ(5 + log 8)−5103sλlog 2) 6151 ,(128) uph = 3 √ 3 2 − 128 2187 √ 3 208...

  5. [5]

    In this background, we evaluate the deflection angle in the strong deflection limit following the formalism reviewed in the previous subsection

    Reissner–Nordstr¨ om (PPL) In thw Reissner–Nordstr¨ om background, null geodesics are governed by the effective metric functions A(r) = 1− 1 r 2 − 2α(1−320π(−1 +r) 2) +β(1−320π(−1 +r) 2) + 4πγ(1−5r+ 5r 2) 80π2r6 ,(133) 22 B(r) = 1 1− 1 r 2 + 2α(1 + 320π(−1 +r) 2) +β(1 + 320π(−1 +r) 2) + 4πγ(16−35r+ 20r 2) 80π2 1− 1 r 4 r6 ,(134) C(r) =r 2 + 24γ 1− 1 r r ,...

  6. [6]

    + 512 √ 2 ln(2− √ 2)−4096 √ 2 ln(2 + √ 2) −24 78−118 √ 2 + √ 2 ln 8 + √ 2 ln 27− √ 2 ln 81− √ 2 ln(2 + √ 2) 23 +β −20800π2 + 5π −3183 + 512 √ 2 + 12288 √ 2 ln 2−3584 √ 2 ln 3 −512 √ 2 ln(6−3 √

  7. [7]

    + 512 √ 2 ln(2− √ 2)−4096 √ 2 ln(2 + √ 2) −24 78−118 √ 2 + √ 2 ln 8 + √ 2 ln 27− √ 2 ln 81− √ 2 ln(2 + √ 2) + 4γπ 8160π2 −15π 1807−3328 √ 2 + 2688 √ 2 ln 2−640 √ 2 ln 3 −256 √ 2 ln(6−3 √

  8. [8]

    + 256 √ 2 ln(2− √ 2)−896 √ 2 ln(2 + √ 2) −4 478−848 √ 2 + 198 √ 2 ln 2−99 √ 2 ln 3 + 11 √ 2 ln 27−66 √ 2 ln(2 + √ 2) i .(138) We next determine the strong deflection limit coefficients and photon surface quantities. Expanding around the photon sphere radiusr ph, we obtain βph = 9 8 + 3(2α(9 + 320π) +β(9 + 320π) + 6πγ(11−320π)) 5120π2 ,(139) ¯a= √ 2− 2α(7−...

    1920

  9. [9]

    + 512 √ 2 ln(2− √ 2)−4096 √ 2 ln(2 + √ 2) −12 156−239 √ 2 + 14 √ 2 ln 3 + √ 2 ln 64−2 √ 2 ln 81 + √ 2 ln 729−2 √ 2 ln(2 + √ 2) +β −20800π2 + 5π −3183 + 1792 √ 2 + 12288 √ 2 ln 2−512 √ 2 ln 3 −512 √ 2 ln(6−3 √

  10. [10]

    + 512 √ 2 ln(2− √ 2)−4096 √ 2 ln(2 + √ 2) −12 156−239 √ 2 + 14 √ 2 ln 3 + √ 2 ln 64−2 √ 2 ln 81 + √ 2 ln 729−2 √ 2 ln(2 + √ 2) + 4γπ 8160π2 −15π 1807−2688 √ 2 + 2688 √ 2 ln 2−256 √ 2 ln 3 −256 √ 2 ln(6−3 √

  11. [11]

    + 256 √ 2 ln(2− √ 2)−896 √ 2 ln(2 + √ 2) −4 478−827 √ 2 + 198 √ 2 ln 2 + 33 √ 2 ln 3 + 11 √ 2 ln 27−66 √ 2 ln(2 + √ 2) i −π.(144) 24

  12. [12]

    Reissner–Nordstr¨ om (PPM) The propagation of null geodesics is described by an effective metric of the form A(r) = 1− 1 r 2 − 2α+β(1−160π(−1 +r) 2) + 4πγ(1−5r+ 5r 2) 80π2r6 ,(145) B(r) = 1 1− 1 r 2 + 2α+β(1 + 160π(−1 +r) 2) + 4πγ(16−35r+ 20r 2) 80π2 1− 1 r 4 r6 ,(146) C(r) =r 2 − 24γ 1− 1 r r ,(147) which include higher-curvature corrections to the order...

  13. [13]

    + 20π −91 + 72 √ 2 + 144 √ 2 ln 2 −48 √ 2 ln 3−48 √ 2 ln(2 + √ 2) + 2γπ −550 + 896 √ 2−396 √ 2 ln 2 + 11 √ 2 ln 531441 + 132 √ 2 ln(2 + √

  14. [14]

    This behavior is a universal hallmark of strong gravitational lensing and is here modified by higher- curvature corrections specific to the extremal Reissner-Nordstr¨ om background

    + 120π 15−40 √ 2 + 36 √ 2 ln 2 25 −12 √ 2 ln 3−12 √ 2 ln(2 + √ 2) i .(150) The strong deflection limit coefficients and the photon surface quantities, obtained by expanding aroundr ph, are βph = 9 8 + 54α+ 3β(9 + 160π) + 6πγ(33 + 960π) 5120π2 ,(151) ¯a= √ 2− 14α+β(7−320π) + 8πγ(11−120π) 640 √ 2π2 ,(152) bD = 2 √ 2 log[3]− 6α(4 + 7 log 3) +β(3(4 + 7 log 3)...

    1920

  15. [15]

    Reissner–Nordstr¨ om (PPL) The functions of the effective metric relevant for null geodesics in this background take the form A(r) = 1− 1 r + Q2 4πr2 + 8Q2γ 1− 1 r r3 − Q2(64α(−1 +r)) + 32β(−1 +r)−γ(−1 + 2r)) 32π2r5 +O(Q 4),(157) 26 B(r) = 1 1− 1 r + Q2 4πr2 + 8Q2γ 1− 1 r r3 + Q2(64α(−1 +r) + 32β(−1 +r) +γ(−7 + 8r) 32π2 1− 1 r 2 r5 +O(Q 4),(158) C(r) =r 2...

  16. [16]

    Reissner–Nordstr¨ om (PPM) The effective geometry experienced by null geodesics can be written as A(r) = 1− 1 r + Q2 4πr2 − 4γ 1− 1 r r3 + Q2(16β(−1 +r)−γ(−1 + 2r)) 32π2r5 +O(Q 4),(169) B(r) = 1 1− 1 r + Q2 4πr2 − 4γ 1− 1 r r3 + Q2(16β(−1 +r) +γ(−7 + 8r)) 32π2 1− 1 r 2 r5 +O(Q 4),(170) C(r) =r 2 + 6γ(Q2 −2πr) πr2 .(171) The auxiliary functionsR(z, r ph) a...

  17. [17]

    Claudel, K

    C.-M. Claudel, K. S. Virbhadra, and G. F. R. Ellis, The Geometry of photon surfaces, J. Math. Phys.42, 818 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0005050

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  18. [18]

    K. S. Virbhadra and G. F. R. Ellis, Schwarzschild black hole lensing, Phys. Rev. D62, 084003 (2000), arXiv:astro- ph/9904193

    arXiv 2000

  19. [19]

    Falcke, F

    H. Falcke, F. Melia, and E. Agol, Viewing the shadow of the black hole at the galactic center, Astrophys. J. Lett.528, L13 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9912263

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  20. [20]

    Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Super- massive Black Hole, Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L1 (2019), arXiv:1906.11238 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  21. [21]

    Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way, Astrophys. J. Lett.930, L12 (2022), arXiv:2311.08680 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  22. [22]

    Vagnozziet al., Horizon-scale tests of gravity theories and fundamental physics from the Event Horizon Telescope image of Sagittarius A, Class

    S. Vagnozziet al., Horizon-scale tests of gravity theories and fundamental physics from the Event Horizon Telescope image of Sagittarius A, Class. Quant. Grav.40, 165007 (2023), arXiv:2205.07787 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    Chandrasekhar and S

    S. Chandrasekhar and S. L. Detweiler, The quasi-normal modes of the Schwarzschild black hole, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 344, 441 (1975)

    1975

  24. [24]

    Iyer and C

    S. Iyer and C. M. Will, Black Hole Normal Modes: A WKB Approach. 1. Foundations and Application of a Higher Order WKB Analysis of Potential Barrier Scattering, Phys. Rev. D35, 3621 (1987)

    1987

  25. [25]

    K. D. Kokkotas and B. G. Schmidt, Quasinormal modes of stars and black holes, Living Rev. Rel.2, 2 (1999), arXiv:gr- qc/9909058

    arXiv 1999

  26. [26]

    Buonanno, G

    A. Buonanno, G. B. Cook, and F. Pretorius, Inspiral, merger and ring-down of equal-mass black-hole binaries, Phys. Rev. D75, 124018 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0610122

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  27. [27]

    Bozza, S

    V. Bozza, S. Capozziello, G. Iovane, and G. Scarpetta, Strong field limit of black hole gravitational lensing, Gen. Rel. Grav.33, 1535 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0102068

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  28. [28]

    Bozza, Gravitational lensing in the strong field limit, Phys

    V. Bozza, Gravitational lensing in the strong field limit, Phys. Rev. D66, 103001 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0208075

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  29. [29]

    G. W. Gibbons and M. C. Werner, Applications of the Gauss-Bonnet theorem to gravitational lensing, Class. Quant. Grav. 25, 235009 (2008), arXiv:0807.0854 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  30. [30]

    Scharnhorst, On propagation of light in the vacuum between plates, Phys

    K. Scharnhorst, On propagation of light in the vacuum between plates, Phys. Lett. B236, 354 (1990), [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 787, 204–204 (2018)]

    1990

  31. [31]

    Barton, Faster ThancLight Between Parallel Mirrors: The Scharnhorst Effect Rederived, Phys

    G. Barton, Faster ThancLight Between Parallel Mirrors: The Scharnhorst Effect Rederived, Phys. Lett. B237, 559 (1990)

    1990

  32. [32]

    Barton and K

    G. Barton and K. Scharnhorst, QED between parallel mirrors: Light signals faster than c, or amplified by the vacuum, J. Phys. A26, 2037 (1993)

    2037

  33. [33]

    J. I. Latorre, P. Pascual, and R. Tarrach, Speed of light in nontrivial vacua, Nucl. Phys. B437, 60 (1995), arXiv:hep- th/9408016

    arXiv 1995

  34. [34]

    Dittrich and H

    W. Dittrich and H. Gies, Light propagation in nontrivial QED vacua, Phys. Rev. D58, 025004 (1998), arXiv:hep- ph/9804375

    arXiv 1998

  35. [35]

    V. A. De Lorenci, R. Klippert, M. Novello, and J. M. Salim, Light propagation in nonlinear electrodynamics, Phys. Lett. B482, 134 (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/0005049

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  36. [36]

    I. T. Drummond and S. J. Hathrell, QED Vacuum Polarization in a Background Gravitational Field and Its Effect on the Velocity of Photons, Phys. Rev. D22, 343 (1980)

    1980

  37. [37]

    R. D. Daniels and G. M. Shore, ’Faster than light’ photons and charged black holes, Nucl. Phys. B425, 634 (1994), arXiv:hep-th/9310114

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  38. [38]

    G. M. Shore, ’Faster than light’ photons in gravitational fields: Causality, anomalies and horizons, Nucl. Phys. B460, 379 30 (1996), arXiv:gr-qc/9504041

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  39. [39]

    R. D. Daniels and G. M. Shore, ’Faster than light’ photons and rotating black holes, Phys. Lett. B367, 75 (1996), arXiv:gr-qc/9508048

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  40. [40]

    G. M. Shore, Superluminality and UV completion, Nucl. Phys. B778, 219 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0701185

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  41. [41]

    H. T. Cho, ’Faster than light’ photons in dilaton black hole space-times, Phys. Rev. D56, 6416 (1997), arXiv:gr-qc/9704014

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  42. [42]

    Izumi, Causal Structures in Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys

    K. Izumi, Causal Structures in Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D90, 044037 (2014), arXiv:1406.0677 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  43. [43]

    Reall, N

    H. Reall, N. Tanahashi, and B. Way, Causality and Hyperbolicity of Lovelock Theories, Class. Quant. Grav.31, 205005 (2014), arXiv:1406.3379 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  44. [44]

    Allahyari, M

    A. Allahyari, M. Khodadi, S. Vagnozzi, and D. F. Mota, Magnetically charged black holes from non-linear electrodynamics and the Event Horizon Telescope, JCAP02, 003, arXiv:1912.08231 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 1912

  45. [45]

    Cao and L.-B

    L.-M. Cao and L.-B. Wu, Hyperbolicity and Causality of Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Gravity in Warped Product Spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D103, 064054 (2021), arXiv:2101.02461 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2021

  46. [46]

    H. S. Reall, Causality in gravitational theories with second order equations of motion, Phys. Rev. D103, 084027 (2021), arXiv:2101.11623 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2021

  47. [47]

    Davies and H

    I. Davies and H. S. Reall, Well-posed formulation of Einstein-Maxwell effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D106, 104019 (2022), arXiv:2112.05603 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2022

  48. [48]

    L. Fu, K. Izumi, and D. Yoshida, Consistency between bulk and boundary causalities in asymptotically anti-de Sitter spacetimes, JHEP10, 184, arXiv:2504.15910 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  49. [49]

    Weinberg, Phenomenological Lagrangians, Physica A96, 327 (1979)

    S. Weinberg, Phenomenological Lagrangians, Physica A96, 327 (1979)

    1979

  50. [50]

    J. F. Donoghue, Leading quantum correction to the Newtonian potential, Phys. Rev. Lett.72, 2996 (1994), arXiv:gr- qc/9310024

    arXiv 1994

  51. [51]

    J. F. Donoghue, General relativity as an effective field theory: The leading quantum corrections, Phys. Rev. D50, 3874 (1994), arXiv:gr-qc/9405057

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  52. [52]

    C. P. Burgess, Quantum gravity in everyday life: General relativity as an effective field theory, Living Rev. Rel.7, 5 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0311082

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  53. [53]

    J. Jing, S. Chen, and Q. Pan, Geometric optics for a coupling model of electromagnetic and gravitational fields, Annals Phys.367, 219 (2016), arXiv:1510.03316 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  54. [54]

    Chen and J

    S. Chen and J. Jing, Strong gravitational lensing for the photons coupled to Weyl tensor in a Schwarzschild black hole spacetime, JCAP10, 002, arXiv:1502.01088 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  55. [55]

    Kanai, Photon Surfaces in Higher-Curvature Gravity: Implications for Quasinormal Modes and Gravitational Lensing, (2026), arXiv:2604.24115 [gr-qc]

    T. Kanai, Photon Surfaces in Higher-Curvature Gravity: Implications for Quasinormal Modes and Gravitational Lensing, (2026), arXiv:2604.24115 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    Kanai, Probing Effective Field Theory Corrections with Quasinormal Modes and Gravitational Lensing in Reissner- Nordstr¨ om Black Holes, (2026), arXiv:2605.27953 [gr-qc]

    T. Kanai, Probing Effective Field Theory Corrections with Quasinormal Modes and Gravitational Lensing in Reissner- Nordstr¨ om Black Holes, (2026), arXiv:2605.27953 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  57. [57]

    Izumi, T

    K. Izumi, T. Noumi, and D. Yoshida, Gedanken experiments to destroy a black hole by a test particle: Multiply charged black hole with higher derivative corrections, Phys. Rev. D110, 044008 (2024), arXiv:2403.11488 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2024

  58. [58]

    Strominger and C

    A. Strominger and C. Vafa, Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, Phys. Lett. B379, 99 (1996), arXiv:hep- th/9601029

    arXiv 1996