Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Parents and Children: Distinguishing Multimodal DeepFakes from Natural Images

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.00500 v2 pith:TQZWW56J submitted 2023-04-02 cs.CV cs.AIcs.MM

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.MM
keywords fakeimagesmodelsdiffusiondetectiontextualcuesdeepfakes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advancements in diffusion models have enabled the generation of realistic deepfakes from textual prompts in natural language. While these models have numerous benefits across various sectors, they have also raised concerns about the potential misuse of fake images and cast new pressures on fake image detection. In this work, we pioneer a systematic study on deepfake detection generated by state-of-the-art diffusion models. Firstly, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of the performance of contrastive and classification-based visual features, respectively extracted from CLIP-based models and ResNet or ViT-based architectures trained on image classification datasets. Our results demonstrate that fake images share common low-level cues, which render them easily recognizable. Further, we devise a multimodal setting wherein fake images are synthesized by different textual captions, which are used as seeds for a generator. Under this setting, we quantify the performance of fake detection strategies and introduce a contrastive-based disentangling method that lets us analyze the role of the semantics of textual descriptions and low-level perceptual cues. Finally, we release a new dataset, called COCOFake, containing about 1.2M images generated from the original COCO image-caption pairs using two recent text-to-image diffusion models, namely Stable Diffusion v1.4 and v2.0.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Revisiting Deepfake Detection: Chronological Continual Learning and the Limits of Generalization

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A chronological continual learning study finds deepfake detectors retain past knowledge but generalize to future generators at near-random AUC around 0.5.

  2. Modeling Human Responses to Multimodal AI Content

    cs.AI 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    A 154K-post study reports that humans identify AI content best when text and images are both present and inconsistent, and offers metrics plus an LLM agent for human-aligned responses.

Pith tools