Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 89 references

The paper claims that the Einstein Telescope can detect gravitational waves lensed by a cosmic string with tension Gµ ≈ 10^-10, and can recover that tension from as few as eight events.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 15:22 UTC pith:TUUVFRYW

load-bearing objection The SNR forecasts for ET are fine, but the claimed Gµ measurement is an artifact of the prior, not the data. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.18441 v2 pith:TUUVFRYW submitted 2026-07-20 astro-ph.CO gr-qc

Detection of cosmic strings by gravitational wave lensing. Predictions for Einstein Telescope

Jakub Szyndler , Tomasz Bulik This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO gr-qc
keywords gravitational wavescosmic stringsgravitational lensingwave opticsEinstein TelescopeBayesian inferencetension measurementbinary black hole mergers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper asks whether the planned Einstein Telescope can catch gravitational waves that have been lensed by a hypothetical cosmic string—a one-dimensional defect left over from the early Universe. It argues yes: for a string tension near 10^-10, wave-optics signatures (diffraction fringes and interference beats) appear in the waveforms and signal-to-noise ratios at levels ET can reach. Working from eight mock binary-black-hole mergers, the authors run a three-stage Bayesian analysis and recover log Gµ = -9.78 (+0.44/−0.49), consistent with the injected value −10. If correct, a third-generation detector would not only detect such lensing events but measure the string tension from a handful of mergers.

Core claim

The central claim is that the amplification factor F(w,y) of a gravitational wave passing a straight cosmic string, computed in wave optics rather than geometric optics, produces measurable effects in the Einstein Telescope, and that the string tension Gµ can be extracted from a small set of lensed events. For a string at z_L=0.5 and log Gµ=-10, the paper injects eight binary black hole mergers at redshifts 1.0–3.4 and passes them through its estimation pipeline. The recovered mean log Gµ is -9.78 with 90% credible interval +0.44/−0.49, consistent with the injected -10, and the individual merger parameters (redshifted chirp mass, mass ratio, redshift, effective tension, source position) are

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the wave-optics amplification factor F(w,y) for a cosmic-string lens, expressed in terms of the dimensionless frequency w and the dimensionless source position y (the source's angular separation from the string in units of the characteristic angle). This factor produces interference fringes and diffraction beats that appear in the lensed waveform and strain spectrum. The companion identity is the time delay Δt = 32 y π² χ_eff (Gµ)² between the two images, which connects an observable delay to an effective tension μ_eff = Gµ√χ_eff; a hierarchical Bayesian step extracts the true tension and breaks the degeneracy between tension and lens distance (the mass-sheet degen

Load-bearing premise

The mock observations assume a set of source positions relative to the string that the paper assigns by an unspecified random routine, and the analysis only considers sources lying in the strong-lensing strip; if real sources are rarely located there, the claimed detection and tension measurement would be optimistic.

What would settle it

A falsifying calculation: draw y from a physical cosmic-string lensing rate model (or from a cosmological string network simulation) and recompute the expected number of ET events per year with y≥0.3 and SNR≥8; if that rate is far below one per decade, the claimed detectability collapses. A second check: measure the time delay and an independent distance for one real lensed event; the recovered Gµ should agree with the hierarchical estimate, otherwise the mass-sheet-breaking assumption is wrong.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Wave optics is required for cosmic-string lensing at these tensions: the geometric-optics approximation overestimates amplification near y≈1, so searches must use the full diffractive treatment.
  • Individual lensed mergers are detectable: for black hole masses 8–50 M_sun at z_S=3 with the string at z_L=0.5, the SNR exceeds 8 across the explored parameter range.
  • The lensed merger's intrinsic parameters can be recovered correctly; the time delay adds an observable that pins down the effective tension of the string.
  • Eight lensed events suffice to measure log Gµ to about ±0.5 at 90% credibility, meaning ET could classify a string's tension rather than just flag lensing.
  • The fringe spacing in the characteristic strain offers a direct visual signature that third-generation detectors can search for without relying on unlensed template matching.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The y values in the mock catalog are not drawn from a physical cosmic-string network, so the event rate is unknown; a population-level calculation of how often a merger lands within the strong-lensing strip (y≳0.3) is the missing ingredient that would turn detectability into a rate.
  • Because the time delay scales as y(Gµ)², events with small y produce sub-second delays that may be hard to measure; any real detection campaign is likely biased toward large y, and that selection would bias a tension estimate unless modeled.
  • Longer signals, such as neutron-star binary mergers or extreme-mass-ratio inspirals, would contain more fringe cycles and could measure the same tension from a single event rather than a population.
  • A template-free search for the characteristic oscillation in the strain spectrum might find lensed events that standard matched-filter searches, tuned to unlensed waveforms, would miss.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper explores whether Einstein Telescope (ET) could detect gravitational-wave lensing by cosmic strings. It computes the wave-optics amplification factor for an infinite straight string, studies SNR and waveform distortions as functions of source position and mass, and then constructs eight mock lensed BBH events from the StarTrack catalogue with injected log(Gµ) = -10 and lens redshift z_L = 0.5. A three-stage Bayesian pipeline (Bilby/UltraNest, Dynesty, emcee) is used to estimate event parameters and then infer the string tension, yielding log(Gµ) = -9.78^{+0.44}_{-0.49}, claimed to be consistent with the injected value. The paper concludes that ET is an excellent tool for detecting and examining cosmic-string lensing events at low tension.

Significance. The forward wave-optics calculations and SNR/waveform demonstrations are useful and largely transparent: the paper uses established amplification-factor expressions, public waveform tools (PyCBC/Bilby), and a public population catalogue (StarTrack), and it clearly separates lensing effects in time-domain waveforms, strains, and SNR. The detectability part, conditional on a source lying in the strong-lensing strip, is a reasonable forward calculation. However, the central parameter-estimation result is not data-driven as presented: as detailed in the major comments, the second-stage Gµ posterior is dominated by the prior on logχ_eff. The quantitative claim of measuring Gµ therefore needs reanalysis or reframing; the conditional detectability conclusion may survive, but the measurement claim does not in its current form.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 5.3, Eq. (15), Tables 1–2] The reported recovery log(Gµ) = -9.78^{+0.44}_{-0.49} is an artifact of the priors, not a measurement. In the mock, z_L is fixed to 0.5 (Sections 4.1 and 5.1), so χ_eff is known exactly for each event via Eq. (6); the exact values are listed in Table 1. The first stage recovers log μ_eff with uncertainties of order 0.002 (Table 2). If χ_eff is fixed, Eq. (15) gives log(Gµ) = log μ_eff - 0.5 log χ_eff, which for every event returns -10 with negligible uncertainty. Instead, the second stage imposes independent uniform priors logχ_eff ∈ [2, χS/4] and log(Gµ) ∈ [-11,-9]. For each event the likelihood is essentially a delta ridge along log(Gµ) = log μ_eff - 0.5 logχ_eff, so marginalizing over logχ_eff produces a flat per-event posterior for log(Gµ) over exactly the prior-determined interval. The hyperposterior is then the overlap of these flat intervals; its midpoint, -9.78, is essentially th
  2. [Section 5.1, Section 5.3, Fig. 4] The claimed detectability is conditional on an unjustified selection of source positions. The eight mock events are assigned y values with an unspecified 'simple Monte Carlo routine', and the estimation prior restricts y to [0.3,1] (log-uniform). All injections in Table 1 lie in this strip. Since the amplification factor, fringe visibility, and SNR depend strongly on y (Eq. 10, Fig. 4), this choice guarantees strong-lensing configurations. No lensing optical depth, impact-parameter distribution, or detection rate is computed. The conclusion that ET is an excellent tool for cosmic-string lensing therefore holds only for sources already inside the strong-lensing strip. The paper should either draw y from a physical impact-parameter distribution and quote an event rate, or explicitly state that all results are conditional on a source being in this strip.
  3. [Section 5.2–5.3, hyperinference step] The claimed breaking of the mass-sheet degeneracy is not implemented by the analysis. Equation (15) shows that each lensing observation constrains only μ_eff, not Gµ and χ_eff separately. The paper states that multiple measurements of log(Gµ) are needed to break this degeneracy, but the actual second stage gives each event an independent, wide prior on logχ_eff; the only shared parameter is log(Gµ). Combining flat prior-induced intervals is not a data-driven break of the degeneracy. A proper hierarchical treatment would either (a) fix z_L and thus χ_eff(i) as done in the mock generation, or (b) model the common z_L and compute χ_eff(i) = χ_L(z_L)[1 - χ_L(z_L)/χ_S(z_S,i)] for all events. As written, the mass-sheet degeneracy remains unbroken and the reported uncertainty does not reflect the data.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and Section 1] Typos and language artifacts: 'vale' in the abstract, 'Lokalna' at the end of the Introduction, and 'pa´ z' in the reference list should be corrected.
  2. [Eq. (19), Section 5.2] The text says 'π — posterior probability density'; from Eq. (19), π is the prior. Please correct the wording.
  3. [Table 2] The last column is labeled 'logarithm of the dimensionless inclination y', but the values are positive y values (0.59, 0.98, etc.), not logarithms. Please make the notation consistent.
  4. [Section 4.2, Fig. 4] The sentence 'In all panels, S/N>8' is too sweeping; Fig. 4 shows damped regions where the SNR is orders of magnitude lower. Specify the mass, y, and redshift ranges for which the threshold holds.
  5. [Section 5.2 vs Section 4.2] Section 5.2 mentions the 'IRPhenomXPHM' waveform model, while Section 4.2 uses 'IMRPhenomD'. Please clarify which waveform model is used in each stage and why.
  6. [Section 5.3] The phrase 'Rest we set fixed' is unclear; please specify which parameters are held fixed in each estimation stage.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the paper is a self-contained injection–recovery study; the tension estimate is prior-sensitive but not circular, and self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation chain is a forward model: the paper adopts a known wave-optics amplification factor (Eq. 10, from external prior work), generates lensed waveforms with PyCBC, computes SNRs, and then performs a Bayesian injection–recovery on eight mock events drawn from the StarTrack catalog. The recovered log Gµ = -9.78^{+0.44}_{-0.49} is consistent with the injected value -10 because the mock was constructed that way; this is exactly what an injection–recovery test is meant to demonstrate, not a prediction derived independently from the target. The second-stage hyperinference (Section 5.3) maps the tightly measured log µ_eff through Eq. 15 using wide uniform priors on logχ_eff and logGµ, so the final Gµ posterior is largely shaped by the χ_eff prior bounds and is not strongly data-driven. This is a real statistical identifiability/robustness caveat, but it is not a circular reduction: no parameter is defined in terms of the target, no fitted quantity is renamed as an independent prediction, and no central claim depends on a self-citation chain. The StarTrack catalog (Olejak et al. 2020) is an external population-synthesis product, and the lensing formalism is cited to independent works (e.g., Jung & Kim 2020; Bulashenko et al. 2025). Thus no circular step is exhibited.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central result depends on (i) the standard wave-optics amplification factor for a straight cosmic string (Eq. 10) taken from prior literature, (ii) the choice Gµ=10^-10, z_L=0.5, and (iii) eight ad hoc source offsets y. The hierarchical inference introduces priors on logGµ and logχ_eff that partially determine the final uncertainty. No new physical entity is introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • String tension Gµ = 1e-10 (chosen)
    Adopted as the representative tension motivated by current constraints; the central detectability and recovery test depend on it.
  • Lens redshift z_L = 0.5 (chosen)
    Fixed for the mock string; sets the distances and the validity of Eq. (10).
  • Source positions y_i (8 events) = 0.31–0.98
    Assigned via an unspecified Monte Carlo; the detection and Gµ recovery are conditional on these values.
  • Time-delay uncertainty σ_Δt = 0.05 Δt_obs
    Ad hoc choice for the time-delay likelihood; the resulting logµ_eff uncertainties in Table 2 appear inconsistent with this 5% width.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Amplification factor formula Eq. (10) from Suyama et al. (2006), Yoo et al. (2013), Jung & Kim (2020)
    Used without derivation; validity requires D_L << D_S.
  • domain assumption Conical metric of a straight cosmic string, Eq. (2), and constant image separation Δ=8πGµ
    Standard string model; the entire lensing formalism rests on it.
  • domain assumption Flat ΛCDM cosmology with Planck 2018 parameters
    Used to convert redshifts to distances and χ_eff; Section 4.
  • domain assumption Approximation D_L << D_S for the simplified amplification factor
    Required for Eq. (10); authors set z_L=0.5 and z_S≥0.55, so the closest source has D_LS/D_S ~0.1, marginally satisfying the condition.
  • domain assumption StarTrack BBH population is representative of real mergers
    The eight mock events are drawn from this synthetic catalog; no selection function for lensing geometry is modeled.
  • domain assumption Independence of the eight lensed events sharing a single string
    The hierarchical inference assumes a common underlying Gµ but treats logχ_eff per event with independent priors, not enforcing a common lens redshift.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 15724 in / 15758 out tokens · 117628 ms · 2026-08-01T15:22:43.614837+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Cosmic strings are not yet confirmed, topological defects formed in the early Universe. They can bend light or gravitational waves, which causes an effect similar to the gravitational lensing. Our goal is to check whether cosmic string could be detected as a lenses of gravitational waves by the Einstein Telescope (ET). To do that the apparatus of wave optics had been applied. Firstly we explored the amplification factor strength and behaviour. Next the wave effects in SNRs and waveforms was examined for different inclinations of the source. Lastly we estimated the string tensions based on eight mergers from the \textsc{StarTrack} simulation, using the Bayesian Inference methods. The wave effects were easily to see in waveforms, SNR and characteristic strains. Also most of the events could be detected, based on their Signal to Noise Ratio values. Almost whole characteristic strain lies in the range of the ET. When it comes to mock observations, we had got estimated vale of a logarithm of the CS tension equal to $\bar{\log{G\mu}}=-9.78^{+0.44}_{-0.49} $, which were consistent with injected value equal to $-10$. At the end we conclude that CSs could be detected by the ET.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.18441 by Jakub Szyndler, Tomasz Bulik.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Gravitational wave lensing by a cosmic string. The vari [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Amplification factor as a function of w and y. The horizontal axis shows the dimensionless frequency w, and the vertical axis shows the dimensionless source position y. The colour bar indicates the absolute value of the amplification factor |F(w, y)|. where w is the dimensionless frequency defined in Eq. 9, and y is the dimensionless source position defined in Eq. 8. The results are presented in [PITH_FUL… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Absolute value of the amplification factor for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: SNR heat maps. Panel (a) shows the single black-hole [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Time-domain waveforms for m = 10 M⊙, with source redshift zS = 3 and lens redshift zL = 0.5. The x-axis shows time (s) and the y-axis shows strain h(t). From top to bottom, the dimensionless source position is y = 0, 0.1, and 0.9, respectively. – log χeff — logarithm of the effective comoving distance (Eq. 6), – log µeff — logarithm of the effective tension (Eq. 15), – y — dimensionless source position (Eq… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Characteristic strain for m = 10 M⊙, with source redshift zS = 3 and lens redshift zL = 0.5. The black curve shows the strain of the merger; coloured curves show detector sensitivities (ET-D in green, Cosmic Explorer in violet, Advanced Virgo in cyan, and aLIGO in blue). The x-axis shows frequency f (Hz) and the y-axis shows the characteristic strain. From top to bot￾tom, the dimensionless source position … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Pipeline of code used to estimate the simulated events [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Corner plot of estimated mean cosmic string tension [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    , keywords =

    Synthetic catalog of black holes in the Milky Way. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936557 , archivePrefix =. 1908.08775 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1908

  2. [2]

    BILBY: A user-friendly Bayesian inference library for gravitational-wave astronomy

    Ashton, Gregory and others. BILBY: A user-friendly Bayesian inference library for gravitational-wave astronomy. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 2019. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab06fc. arXiv:1811.02042

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  3. [3]

    B\,ilby-MCMC: an MCMC sampler for gravitational-wave inference

    Ashton, Gregory and Talbot, Colm. B\,ilby-MCMC: an MCMC sampler for gravitational-wave inference. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2021. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2236. arXiv:2106.08730

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  4. [5]

    , keywords =

    Cosmic strings as gravitational lenses. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/184303 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/184303

  5. [6]

    Universe , keywords =

    Strong Gravitational Lensing of Gravitational Waves: A Review. Universe , keywords =. doi:10.3390/universe9050200 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.3390/universe9050200

  6. [7]

    , keywords =

    Detecting cosmic strings with lensed fast radio bursts. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.103033 , archivePrefix =. 2206.13534 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  7. [8]

    , keywords =

    Gravitational lensing of waves: Novel methods for wave-optics phenomena. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.103539 , archivePrefix =. 2409.04606 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  8. [9]

    , keywords =

    Prospects of cosmic superstring detection through microlensing of extragalactic point-like sources. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2855 , archivePrefix =. 1905.03796 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1905

  9. [10]

    Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement , year = 1999, month = jan, volume =

    Wave Optics in Gravitational Lensing. Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement , year = 1999, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.1143/PTPS.133.137 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1143/ptps.133.137 1999

  10. [11]

    , keywords =

    Constraints on Cosmic Strings Using Data from the Third Advanced LIGO Virgo Observing Run. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.241102 , archivePrefix =. 2101.12248 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  11. [12]

    , keywords =

    CSL-1: chance projection effect or serendipitous discovery of a gravitational lens induced by a cosmic string?. , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06568.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0302547 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2003

  12. [13]

    CSL-1: Lensing by a Cosmic String or a Dark Matter Filament?

    CSL-1: Lensing by a Cosmic String or a Dark Matter Filament?. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0511085 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0511085 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0511085

  13. [14]

    , year = 1984, month = nov, volume =

    Formation and evolution of cosmic strings. , year = 1984, month = nov, volume =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.30.2036 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.30.2036 1984

  14. [15]

    , keywords =

    Comparison of cosmic string and superstring models to NANOGrav 12.5-year results. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.103512 , archivePrefix =. 2102.08194 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  15. [16]

    doi:10.1007/978-3-662-03758-4 , adsurl =

    Gravitational Lenses. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-03758-4 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1007/978-3-662-03758-4

  16. [17]

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.10473621 , version =

    gwastro/pycbc: v2.3.3 release of PyCBC. doi:10.5281/zenodo.10473621 , version =

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.10473621

  17. [18]

    Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A , keywords =

    Cosmic strings and superstrings. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A , keywords =. doi:10.1098/rspa.2009.0591 , archivePrefix =. 0911.1345 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2009

  18. [19]

    , keywords =

    Cosmic strings and domain walls. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/0370-1573(85)90033-X , adsurl =

    doi:10.1016/0370-1573(85)90033-x

  19. [20]

    and Taylor, S

    Lentati, L. and Taylor, S. R. and Mingarelli, C. M. F. and Sesana, A. and Sanidas, S. A. and Vecchio, A. and Caballero, R. N. and Lee, K. J. and van Haasteren, R. and Babak, S. and Bassa, C. G. and Brem, P. and Burgay, M. and Champion, D. J. and Cognard, I. and Desvignes, G. and Gair, J. R. and Guillemot, L. and Hessels, J. W. T. and Janssen, G. H. and Ka...

    2015

  20. [21]

    doi:10.1515/9780691206721 , adsurl =

    Principles of Physical Cosmology. doi:10.1515/9780691206721 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1515/9780691206721

  21. [22]

    Kibble, T. W. B. Topology of Cosmic Domains and Strings. J. Phys. A. 1976. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/9/8/029

    doi:10.1088/0305-4470/9/8/029 1976

  22. [23]

    , keywords =

    Cosmic superstrings revisited in light of NANOGrav 15-year data. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.103511 , archivePrefix =. 2306.17147 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [24]

    Superconducting Strings

    Witten, Edward. Superconducting Strings. Nucl. Phys. B. 1985. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90022-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90022-7 1985

  24. [25]

    , keywords =

    Cosmic string loop microlensing. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.124003 , archivePrefix =. 1311.7132 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [26]

    Planck 2013 results. XXV. Searches for cosmic strings and other topological defects. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321621 , archivePrefix =. 1303.5085 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  26. [27]

    , keywords =

    Search for cosmic strings in the COSMOS survey. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.122004 , archivePrefix =. 1008.0426 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  27. [28]

    Results from the HST/ACS image archive

    Direct observation of cosmic strings via their strong gravitational lensing effect - II. Results from the HST/ACS image archive. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16562.x , archivePrefix =. 0908.0602 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2010

  28. [29]

    , keywords =

    Hubble imaging excludes cosmic string lens. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.73.087302 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0603838 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [31]

    Physics Letters B , year = 1985, month = apr, volume =

    Cosmic superstrings. Physics Letters B , year = 1985, month = apr, volume =. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)90540-4 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)90540-4 1985

  30. [32]

    , keywords =

    Wave Effects in the Gravitational Lensing of Gravitational Waves from Chirping Binaries. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/377430 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0305055 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [33]

    Diffraction around caustics in gravitational wave lensing , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.1103/tkk2-x9st , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/tkk2-x9st 2025

  32. [34]

    , keywords =

    Wave Optics, Interference, and Decoherence in Strong Gravitational Lensing. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11214-025-01157-7 , archivePrefix =. 2304.01202 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [35]

    Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics , keywords =

    Femto-lensing due to a cosmic string. Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1093/ptep/pts045 , archivePrefix =. 1209.0903 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [36]

    , keywords =

    Gravitational lensing effects of vacuum strings - Exact solutions. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/162808 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/162808

  35. [37]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 , archivePrefix =. 1807.06209 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  36. [38]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , abstract =

    Patrick Peter , title =. Classical and Quantum Gravity , abstract =. 1994 , month =. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/11/1/015 , url =

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/11/1/015 1994

  37. [39]

    , keywords =

    Diffraction in Gravitational Lensing for Compact Objects of Low Mass. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/164389 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/164389

  38. [40]

    , keywords =

    Wave effects in gravitational lensing of electromagnetic radiation. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.34.1708 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.34.1708

  39. [41]

    , keywords =

    Probing cosmic strings with gravitational-wave fringe. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/07/068 , archivePrefix =. 1810.04172 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  40. [42]

    Physics Letters A , keywords =

    Wave diffraction by a cosmic string. Physics Letters A , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2016.07.008 , archivePrefix =. 1605.03176 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  41. [43]

    , keywords =

    Wave effect in gravitational lensing by a cosmic string. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.68.041302 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0309694 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  42. [44]

    Gravitational field of a global string , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 1988 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.37.3438 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.37.3438 1988

  43. [45]

    and Abbott, T.D

    Abbott, R. and Abbott, T.D. and Acernese, F. and Ackley, K. and Adams, C. and Adhikari, N. and Adhikari, R. X. and Adya, V.B. and Affeldt, C. and Agarwal, D. and i in. , year=. GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run , volume=. Physical Review X , publisher=. doi:10.1103/physrevx.13....

    doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.041039

  44. [46]

    Predictions for high-resolution imaging surveys

    Direct observation of cosmic strings via their strong gravitational lensing effect - I. Predictions for high-resolution imaging surveys. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12657.x , archivePrefix =. 0710.5544 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2007

  45. [47]

    Exact wave propagation in a spacetime with a cosmic string , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2006 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.73.024026 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.73.024026 2006

  46. [48]

    Double Compact Objects. II. Cosmological Merger Rates. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/779/1/72 , archivePrefix =. 1308.1546 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  47. [49]

    , keywords =

    Probing compact dark matter with gravitational wave fringes detected by the Einstein Telescope. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1388 , archivePrefix =. 2001.07891 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  48. [50]

    , keywords =

    Science with the Einstein Telescope: a comparison of different designs. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/07/068 , archivePrefix =. 2303.15923 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  49. [51]

    , keywords =

    Lensing rates of gravitational wave signals displaying beat patterns detectable by DECIGO and B-DECIGO. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.044005 , archivePrefix =. 2009.08116 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  50. [52]

    , keywords =

    Probing minihalo lenses with diffracted gravitational waves. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.124020 , archivePrefix =. 2403.13876 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [53]

    , keywords =

    Detecting lensing-induced diffraction in astrophysical gravitational waves. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.104029 , archivePrefix =. 1810.00003 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  52. [54]

    , keywords =

    Lensing of gravitational waves: universal signatures in the beating pattern. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/07/022 , archivePrefix =. 2112.10773 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  53. [55]

    Physica Scripta Volume T , keywords =

    Cosmic strings and the large-scale structure of the Universe. Physica Scripta Volume T , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0031-8949/1991/T36/013 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1088/0031-8949/1991/t36/013 1991

  54. [56]

    Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO

    Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society , year = 2019, volume =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1907.04833 , archivePrefix =. 1907.04833 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.04833 2019

  55. [57]

    Modern Physics Letters A , keywords =

    Gravitational-wave searches in the era of Advanced LIGO and Virgo. Modern Physics Letters A , keywords =. doi:10.1142/S0217732321300226 , archivePrefix =. 2108.01184 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  56. [58]

    , keywords =

    Gravitational-Wave Fringes at LIGO: Detecting Compact Dark Matter by Gravitational Lensing. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.041103 , archivePrefix =. 1712.01396 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  57. [59]

    , keywords =

    Chirp mass-distance distributions of the sources of gravitational waves. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936784 , archivePrefix =. 2105.10516 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  58. [60]

    Source localization with an advanced gravitational wave detector network

    Fairhurst, Stephen. Source localization with an advanced gravitational wave detector network. Class. Quant. Grav. 2011. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/28/10/105021. arXiv:1010.6192

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  59. [61]

    , keywords =

    Exploring compact binary populations with the Einstein Telescope. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142856 , archivePrefix =. 2112.04058 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  60. [62]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , year = 2010, month = oct, volume =

    The Einstein Telescope: a third-generation gravitational wave observatory. Classical and Quantum Gravity , year = 2010, month = oct, volume =. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/27/19/194002 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1088/0264-9381/27/19/194002 2010

  61. [63]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    GWTC-4.0: Searches for Gravitational-Wave Lensing Signatures. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2512.16347 , archivePrefix =. 2512.16347 , primaryClass =

    doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.16347

  62. [64]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    On the observation of cosmic strings via gravitational-wave lensing. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2510.20442 , archivePrefix =. 2510.20442 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.20442

  63. [65]

    , keywords =

    Gravitational-wave searches for cosmic string cusps in Einstein Telescope data using deep learning. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.022006 , archivePrefix =. 2308.12323 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  64. [66]

    , keywords =

    Searching for cosmic strings in CMB anisotropy maps using wavelets and curvelets. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/06/004 , archivePrefix =. 1608.00004 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  65. [67]

    , keywords =

    GW231123: A Binary Black Hole Merger with Total Mass 190-265 M _. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae0c9c , archivePrefix =. 2507.08219 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  66. [68]

    , keywords =

    Identification and characterization of distorted gravitational waves by lensing using deep learning. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/8cz1-kl6n , archivePrefix =. 2511.07186 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  67. [69]

    , keywords =

    Lensing of gravitational waves as a probe of compact dark matter. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3118 , archivePrefix =. 2109.03213 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  68. [70]

    , keywords =

    Gravitational wave lensing beyond general relativity: Birefringence, echoes, and shadows. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.124048 , archivePrefix =. 2009.12187 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  69. [71]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Across the Universe: GW231123 as a magnified and diffracted black hole merger. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2512.17631 , archivePrefix =. 2512.17631 , primaryClass =

    doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.17631

  70. [72]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Dark Matter Subhalos and Higher Order Catastrophes in Gravitational Wave Lensing. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2510.14953 , archivePrefix =. 2510.14953 , primaryClass =

    doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.14953

  71. [73]

    , keywords =

    Eikonal gravitational-wave lensing in Einstein-aether theory. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/jrsp-1xll , archivePrefix =. 2404.07782 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  72. [74]

    , keywords =

    Gravitational wave lensing: probing Fuzzy Dark Matter with LISA. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/07/025 , archivePrefix =. 2502.10758 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  73. [75]

    , keywords =

    Signatures of dark and baryonic structures on weakly lensed gravitational waves. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.024068 , archivePrefix =. 2407.04052 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  74. [76]

    , keywords =

    Probing lens-induced gravitational-wave birefringence as a test of general relativity. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.024052 , archivePrefix =. 2301.04826 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  75. [77]

    , keywords =

    Measuring the viscosity of dark matter with strongly lensed gravitational waves. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaa205 , archivePrefix =. 2012.12462 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  76. [78]

    , keywords =

    Propagation and lensing of gravitational waves in Palatini f (R \^) gravity. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.124014 , archivePrefix =. 2312.09908 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  77. [79]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    The Science of the Einstein Telescope. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2503.12263 , archivePrefix =. 2503.12263 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.12263

  78. [80]

    Metric independence

    Gravitational lensing beyond geometric optics: II. Metric independence. General Relativity and Gravitation , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s10714-019-2646-7 , archivePrefix =. 1906.10708 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1906

  79. [81]

    The Journal of Open Source Software , keywords =

    UltraNest - a robust, general purpose Bayesian inference engine. The Journal of Open Source Software , keywords =. doi:10.21105/joss.03001 , archivePrefix =. 2101.09604 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  80. [82]

    , keywords =

    emcee: The MCMC Hammer. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/670067 , archivePrefix =. 1202.3665 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

Showing first 80 references.