pith. sign in

arxiv: 2403.04894 · v1 · pith:TZ2XLSKAnew · submitted 2024-03-07 · 💻 cs.CL · cs.AI

ConstitutionalExperts: Training a Mixture of Principle-based Prompts

classification 💻 cs.CL cs.AI
keywords prompttechniquesconstitutionalexpertsimprovesmethodothertraininggiven
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are highly capable at a variety of tasks given the right prompt, but writing one is still a difficult and tedious process. In this work, we introduce ConstitutionalExperts, a method for learning a prompt consisting of constitutional principles (i.e. rules), given a training dataset. Unlike prior methods that optimize the prompt as a single entity, our method incrementally improves the prompt by surgically editing individual principles. We also show that we can improve overall performance by learning unique prompts for different semantic regions of the training data and using a mixture-of-experts (MoE) architecture to route inputs at inference time. We compare our method to other state of the art prompt-optimization techniques across six benchmark datasets. We also investigate whether MoE improves these other techniques. Our results suggest that ConstitutionalExperts outperforms other prompt optimization techniques by 10.9% (F1) and that mixture-of-experts improves all techniques, suggesting its broad applicability.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Real-Time Group Dynamics with LLM Facilitation: Evidence from a Charity Allocation Task

    cs.HC 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LLM facilitators in real-stakes group charity decisions shift specific allocations without raising consensus or participation equity, yet increase perceived trust and preference for the process.

  2. Real-Time Group Dynamics with LLM Facilitation: Evidence from a Charity Allocation Task

    cs.HC 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    LLM facilitation in group charity allocation leaves consensus and participation equity unchanged while shifting specific allocations up to 5.5 points and increasing perceived trust.