Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 157 references

Whose Good, Whose Place? The Moral Geography of Agentic AI for Social Good

T0 review · 2 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-05-25 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Papers on agentic AI for social good rarely specify the places they target, especially for institutional and justice goals.

desk verdict The survey flags an asymmetry in geographic specification by SDG type but gives no details on paper selection or coding, so the 13% vs 37-40% split cannot be treated as reliable. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.22995 v1 pith:TZOCVCNE submitted 2026-05-21 cs.CY cs.AI

Poli Nemkova , Haeshitha Indukuri , Jaedon Charles This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CYcs.AI
keywords agenticAIsocialgoodSDGsgeographiccontextaccountabilitymoralabstraction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The authors survey 112 papers that propose agentic AI systems tied to UN Sustainable Development Goals. They document that 73 percent of the papers give no geographic context at all. Rates of specification are higher for health and ecological goals but fall to 13 percent for institutional and social-policy goals, with SDG 16 showing the lowest rate. The pattern leads the authors to describe a form of moral abstraction in which institutional goods are treated as universal while physical goods are treated as place-bound. They further observe that only one-quarter of the papers describe any real-world deployment and identify five accountability gaps along with a proposed minimal reporting standard.

What carries the argument

Moral-geographic asymmetry measured by coding each paper for SDG alignment and for presence or absence of any geographic context specification.

What would settle it

A larger or differently sampled replication that finds equal or higher geographic specification rates for institutional SDGs than for health and ecological SDGs would falsify the asymmetry.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

A structured survey of 112 papers on agentic AI for social good finds a moral-geographic asymmetry in which papers specify geographic context 37-40 percent of the time when aligned with health or physical/ecological SDGs but only 13 percent of the time when aligned with institutional and social-policy SDGs; SDG 16 is both the most frequent target and the one with the lowest specification rate, which the authors read as treating institutional good as universal in ways the literature does not apply to health or ecological good.

Load-bearing premise

The 112 papers form a representative sample of the agentic AI for social good literature that can be coded consistently for SDG alignment and geographic specification.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Claims of social good for institutional AI rest on thinner geographic grounding than claims for health or ecology.
  • Low rates of reported deployment limit the ability to test whether systems actually produce the claimed benefits in specific places.
  • Five distinct accountability gaps follow from the combination of absent geography and absent deployment data.
  • A minimal reporting standard would require explicit statements of place, affected communities, and participatory design steps.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Designers working on agentic systems for justice or governance domains may need to treat local legal and cultural mapping as a first-order requirement rather than an optional add-on.
  • The asymmetry could be tested by comparing specification rates before and after journals adopt the authors' proposed reporting standard.
  • Similar patterns may appear in non-agentic AI literature when the same coding method is applied to SDG-aligned papers.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a structured survey of 112 papers on agentic AI for social good (2015–2026) that invoke the SDGs. It reports that 82/112 papers (73%) specify no geographic context, with rates of 37–40% for health or physical/ecological SDGs versus 13% for institutional and social-policy SDGs; SDG 16 is the most-covered goal yet has the lowest geographic-specification rate. Only 28/112 papers (25%) report real-world deployment or testing. The authors interpret these patterns as evidence of moral abstraction, identify five accountability gaps, and propose a minimal reporting standard for more context-specific and participatory agentic AI for social good.

Significance. If the survey is methodologically sound, the work usefully documents an asymmetry in how geographic context is handled across SDG categories in the agentic-AI-for-social-good literature and connects it to accountability concerns. The proposed reporting standard offers a concrete, actionable contribution that could improve future work in this interdisciplinary area.

major comments (2)
  1. [Survey methodology section] Survey methodology section (likely §3 or equivalent): the manuscript states the final counts and percentages (82/112, 37–40%, 13%) but provides no description of search strategy, inclusion/exclusion criteria, operationalization of “agentic AI,” how SDG alignment was coded, or how presence/absence of geographic context was determined. Because the central asymmetry claim is defined by the difference between these rates, the absence of this information is load-bearing.
  2. [Results section] Results section (reporting the 13% vs. 37–40% rates): without inter-rater reliability statistics, single-coder consistency checks, or a coding protocol, the stability of the SDG-by-geography cross-tabulation cannot be assessed, directly affecting the robustness of the moral-geographic asymmetry finding.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback highlighting the need for greater methodological transparency. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Survey methodology section (likely §3 or equivalent): the manuscript states the final counts and percentages (82/112, 37–40%, 13%) but provides no description of search strategy, inclusion/exclusion criteria, operationalization of “agentic AI,” how SDG alignment was coded, or how presence/absence of geographic context was determined. Because the central asymmetry claim is defined by the difference between these rates, the absence of this information is load-bearing.

    Authors: We agree that the methodology section requires expansion to support the central claims. In the revised manuscript we will add a full description of the search strategy (databases, keywords, date range), inclusion/exclusion criteria, the operational definition of agentic AI used, the coding process for SDG alignment, and the explicit criteria for coding presence or absence of geographic context. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Results section (reporting the 13% vs. 37–40% rates): without inter-rater reliability statistics, single-coder consistency checks, or a coding protocol, the stability of the SDG-by-geography cross-tabulation cannot be assessed, directly affecting the robustness of the moral-geographic asymmetry finding.

    Authors: We acknowledge this limitation in the current draft. The revised version will include a dedicated coding protocol subsection and describe the consistency checks performed (single primary coder with co-author review). We will also note the absence of formal inter-rater reliability statistics as a methodological limitation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: survey findings derive from external paper classification, not self-referential definitions or fitted inputs.

full rationale

The paper performs a literature survey of 112 external papers on agentic AI for social good, classifying them by SDG alignment and presence/absence of geographic context specification to derive counts (e.g., 82/112, 37-40% vs 13%). No equations, parameters, derivations, or self-citations appear in the provided text that reduce the central asymmetry claim to the authors' own prior results or inputs by construction. The patterns of self-definitional loops, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or ansatz smuggling via citation are absent; the empirical rates are presented as outputs of the survey process rather than tautological restatements of any internal model.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

As an empirical literature survey the central claims rest on assumptions about sampling and coding rather than mathematical derivations or new postulated entities.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption The 112 papers form a representative sample of agentic AI for social good literature published 2015-2026 and can be reliably categorized by SDG alignment and geographic context specification.
    This assumption directly supports the reported 73% figure, the SDG-specific rates, and the asymmetry interpretation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Whose Good, Whose Place? The Moral Geography of Agentic AI for Social Good." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TZOCVCNE

@misc{pith2026260522995,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Whose Good, Whose Place? The Moral Geography of Agentic AI for Social Good},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TZOCVCNE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.22995}
}
read the original abstract

Agentic AI systems are increasingly proposed for social-good domains, often invoking the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as a vocabulary of global benefit. Yet claims of social good do not establish accountability to the communities a system claims to serve. We present a structured survey of 112 papers on agentic AI for social good published between 2015 and 2026. We find a moral-geographic asymmetry: papers are least likely to specify geographic context in precisely the domains where local political, legal, and cultural context matters most. Across the corpus, 82 of 112 papers (73%) specify no geographic context. Papers aligned with health or physical/ecological SDGs specify geography 37-40% of the time, while papers aligned with institutional and social-policy SDGs do so only 13%. SDG 16, peace, justice, and strong institutions, is both the most-covered goal in the corpus and the one with the lowest geographic-specification rate. We interpret this as moral abstraction: agentic AI for social good often treats institutional good as universal in ways it does not treat health or ecological good. A second finding compounds this: only 28 of 112 papers (25%) report any real-world deployment or small-scale test. We identify five accountability gaps and propose a minimal reporting standard for more context-specific, participatory, and accountable agentic AI for social good.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.22995 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Distribution of corpus papers by publication year. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Distribution of corpus papers across Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The literature is concentrated on a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Sensitivity analysis for geographic specification coding. “Global” is not treated as geographic specificity, but as a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Per-SDG geographic specification rates under broad and strict coding. The institutional and governance-oriented [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Distribution of evaluation types in the corpus. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

157 extracted references · 157 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Economics , volume=

    The evolution of financial analysis: From manual methods to AI and AI agents , author=. Economics , volume=

    work page

  2. [2]

    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL , volume=

    Agentic Workflows in Healthcare: Advancing Clinical Efficiency through AI Integration , author=. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL , volume=

    work page

  3. [3]

    Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , pages=

    Fact-audit: An adaptive multi-agent framework for dynamic fact-checking evaluation of large language models , author=. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , pages=

    work page

  4. [4]

    SRA-Physical Sciences , volume=

    Leveraging AI chat assistants for enhanced food security in Africa: A comprehensive integration of large language models, retrieval augmented generation, and vector embedding techniques , author=. SRA-Physical Sciences , volume=

    work page

  5. [5]

    2025 , school=

    An AI-based Model for Managing a Smart Seafood Supply Chain , author=. 2025 , school=

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining , pages=

    Pest management in cotton farms: an AI-system case study from the global south , author=. Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining , pages=

    work page

  7. [7]

    Computers and Electronics in Agriculture , volume=

    A survey on intelligent agents and multi-agents for irrigation scheduling , author=. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Kybernetes , pages=

    LLM agent driven online auction mechanism for agricultural products , author=. Kybernetes , pages=. 2025 , publisher=

    work page 2025

Show all 157 references
  1. [9]

    Conference of the European Social Simulation Association , pages=

    Aspiration adaptation, poverty, and agricultural management: An agent-based modelling study , author=. Conference of the European Social Simulation Association , pages=. 2023 , organization=

    2023

  2. [10]

    Geoscientific Model Development Discussions (GMDD) , year=

    copan: LPJmL: A new hybrid modelling framework for dynamic land use and agricultural management , author=. Geoscientific Model Development Discussions (GMDD) , year=

  3. [11]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.17311 , year=

    A self-evolving AI agent system for climate science , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.17311 , year=

  4. [12]

    Building and Environment , volume=

    AI agent-based indoor environmental informatics: Concept, methodology, and case study , author=. Building and Environment , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  5. [13]

    0: Integrating institutional network dynamics powered by large language models with land use change simulation , author=

    InsNet-CRAFTY v1. 0: Integrating institutional network dynamics powered by large language models with land use change simulation , author=. EGUsphere , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  6. [14]

    NeurIPS 2023 Workshop on Tackling Climate Change with Machine Learning: Blending New and Existing Knowledge Systems , year =

    Sustainability AI Copilot: Analyze and Ideate at Scale to Enable Positive Impact , author =. NeurIPS 2023 Workshop on Tackling Climate Change with Machine Learning: Blending New and Existing Knowledge Systems , year =

    2023

  7. [15]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    SustainGym: Reinforcement learning environments for sustainable energy systems , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

  8. [16]

    Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 3: System Demonstrations) , pages=

    My Climate CoPilot: A Question Answering System for Climate Adaptation in Agriculture , author=. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 3: System Demonstrations) , pages=

  9. [17]

    Third International Conference on Digital Technologies, Optics, and Materials Science (DTIEE 2024) , volume=

    Decision support in a smart greenhouse using large language model with retrieval augmented generation , author=. Third International Conference on Digital Technologies, Optics, and Materials Science (DTIEE 2024) , volume=. 2024 , organization=

    2024

  10. [18]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.16872 , year=

    Enabling Adoption of Regenerative Agriculture through Soil Carbon Copilots , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.16872 , year=

  11. [19]

    2021 IEEE 12th annual information technology, electronics and mobile communication conference (IEMCON) , pages=

    Masa: AI-adaptive mobile app for sustainable agriculture , author=. 2021 IEEE 12th annual information technology, electronics and mobile communication conference (IEMCON) , pages=. 2021 , organization=

    2021

  12. [20]

    International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction , pages=

    Assessing household underestimation of hurricane food shortages via large language model agent simulation , author=. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction , pages=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  13. [21]

    Smart Cities , volume=

    Unveiling Hidden Green Corridors: An Agent-Based Simulation (ABS) of Urban Green Continuity for Ecosystem Services and Climate Resilience , author=. Smart Cities , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  14. [22]

    npj climate action , volume=

    Harnessing human and machine intelligence for planetary-level climate action , author=. npj climate action , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  15. [23]

    European Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology (EJCSIT) , volume=

    Autonomous System for Disaster Response & Recovery , author=. European Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology (EJCSIT) , volume=

  16. [24]

    Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research , volume=

    A disaster response system based on human-agent collectives , author=. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research , volume=

  17. [25]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.09656 , year=

    Multi-level value alignment in agentic AI systems: Survey and perspectives , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.09656 , year=

  18. [26]

    Ethical decision-making in autonomous multi-agent systems for disaster relief: An ethical AI approach to autonomous disaster response , author=

  19. [27]

    2025 IEEE International Conference on eScience (eScience) , pages=

    Flood Watch: A Multi-Agent System for Smarter Disaster Response , author=. 2025 IEEE International Conference on eScience (eScience) , pages=. 2025 , organization=

    2025

  20. [28]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.17200 , year=

    A rag-based multi-agent llm system for natural hazard resilience and adaptation , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.17200 , year=

  21. [29]

    Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction , volume=

    Multi-agents are social groups: Investigating social influence of multiple agents in human-agent interactions , author=. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  22. [30]

    Future Internet , volume=

    A regional multi-agent air monitoring platform , author=. Future Internet , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  23. [31]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.05147 , year=

    Multi-agent reinforcement learning and human social factors in climate change mitigation , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.05147 , year=

    2002

  24. [32]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    Cooperate or collapse: Emergence of sustainable cooperation in a society of llm agents , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

  25. [33]

    Better AI

    Using ABM and Serious Games to Create" Better AI" , author=. 2024 Annual Modeling and Simulation Conference (ANNSIM) , pages=. 2024 , organization=

    2024

  26. [34]

    Smart Cities , volume=

    Responsible artificial intelligence hyper-automation with generative AI agents for sustainable cities of the future , author=. Smart Cities , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  27. [35]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.00058 , year=

    Scalable multiagent driving policies for reducing traffic congestion , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.00058 , year=

  28. [36]

    Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems , pages=

    Strategic human-agent interaction: From promoting traffic safety to search and rescue , author=. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems , pages=

  29. [37]

    Ai Communications , volume=

    Deep reinforcement learning for multi-agent interaction , author=. Ai Communications , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  30. [38]

    SoftwareX , volume=

    WATCHED: A Web AI Agent Tool for Combating Hate speech by Expanding Data , author=. SoftwareX , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  31. [39]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.17511 , year=

    Multi-agent systems for misinformation lifecycle: Detection, correction and source identification , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.17511 , year=

  32. [40]

    AI Communications , volume=

    From intelligent agents to trustworthy human-centred multiagent systems , author=. AI Communications , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  33. [41]

    International Joint Conference on Rules and Reasoning 2025 , year=

    Scalable, Context-Aware NLP Moderation for Child Safety: A Multi-Agent Ethical and Legal Compliance Framework , author=. International Joint Conference on Rules and Reasoning 2025 , year=

    2025

  34. [42]

    Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , pages=

    Greater than the Sum of its Parts: Exploring Social Influence of Multi-Agents , author=. Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , pages=

  35. [43]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.01129 , year=

    Towards a multi-agent system for online hate speech detection , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.01129 , year=

  36. [44]

    Proceedings of the 2025 International Conference on Generative Artificial Intelligence for Business , pages=

    Toward verifiable misinformation detection: A multi-tool LLM agent framework , author=. Proceedings of the 2025 International Conference on Generative Artificial Intelligence for Business , pages=

    2025

  37. [45]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.09342 , year=

    Improving Implicit Hate Speech Detection via a Community-Driven Multi-Agent Framework , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.09342 , year=

  38. [46]

    Information Processing & Management , volume=

    DelphiAgent: A trustworthy multi-agent verification framework for automated fact verification , author=. Information Processing & Management , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  39. [47]

    Journal of Special Education Preparation , volume=

    Using an artificial intelligence (AI) agent to support teacher instruction and student learning , author=. Journal of Special Education Preparation , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  40. [48]

    Proceedings of ACM Turing Celebration Conference-China , pages=

    AI can help to create a humane society: cognition amplifiers and guardian angels , author=. Proceedings of ACM Turing Celebration Conference-China , pages=

  41. [49]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.20082 , year=

    Evolution of ai in education: Agentic workflows , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.20082 , year=

  42. [50]

    Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025 , pages=

    Agent laboratory: Using llm agents as research assistants , author=. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025 , pages=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  43. [51]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06292 , year=

    The ai scientist: Towards fully automated open-ended scientific discovery , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06292 , year=

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.07407 , year=

    Using generative AI and multi-agents to provide automatic feedback , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.07407 , year=

  45. [53]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.17767 , year=

    Researchtown: Simulator of human research community , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.17767 , year=

  46. [54]

    Available at SSRN 5390141 , year=

    Agentic AI Regulation Under the AI Act: A Proof of Concept or A Concept to Prove? , author=. Available at SSRN 5390141 , year=

  47. [55]

    2023 , publisher=

    Decentralised autonomous society through large language models’ based agents: a pathway to empower small communities , author=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  48. [56]

    Research Paper, OpenAI , year=

    Practices for governing agentic AI systems , author=. Research Paper, OpenAI , year=

  49. [57]

    Applications, and Governance (May 10, 2025) , year=

    Agentic artificial intelligence in public administration: Foundations, applications, and governance , author=. Applications, and Governance (May 10, 2025) , year=

    2025

  50. [58]

    Agentic Workflows in the Practice of Law-AI Agents as Ethics Counsel , author=. Geo. J. Legal Ethics , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  51. [59]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.03789 , year=

    Socially intelligent genetic agents for the emergence of explicit norms , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.03789 , year=

  52. [60]

    Online Social Networks and Media , volume=

    Safeguarding decentralized social media: LLM agents for automating community rule compliance , author=. Online Social Networks and Media , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  53. [61]

    Clinical and Translational Science , volume=

    Agents for change: Artificial intelligent workflows for quantitative clinical pharmacology and translational sciences , author=. Clinical and Translational Science , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  54. [62]

    Informatics and Health , volume=

    Next-generation agentic AI for transforming healthcare , author=. Informatics and Health , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  55. [63]

    JMIR Research Protocols , volume=

    Neural conversational agent for weight loss counseling: protocol for an implementation and feasibility study , author=. JMIR Research Protocols , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  56. [64]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.12868 , year=

    Imas: A comprehensive agentic approach to rural healthcare delivery , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.12868 , year=

  57. [65]

    Rural Infrastructure Health Monitoring System: Using AI to Increase Rural Water Supply Reliability , author=

  58. [66]

    Nejm Ai , volume=

    MedAgentBench: a virtual EHR environment to benchmark medical LLM agents , author=. Nejm Ai , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  59. [67]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.11330 , year=

    Decoding Plastic Toxicity: An Intelligent Framework for Conflict-Aware Relational Metapath Extraction from Scientific Abstracts , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.11330 , year=

  60. [68]

    Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=

    Realizing AI for Impact: Towards Participatory Human-AI Collaboration for Water Conservation and Reproductive Health , author=. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=

  61. [69]

    Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , pages=

    Ai for social impact: Results from deployments for public health and conversation , author=. Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , pages=

  62. [70]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.08630 , year=

    Open problems in cooperative AI , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.08630 , year=

    2012

  63. [71]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.07880 , year=

    Towards foundation-model-based multiagent system to accelerate AI for social impact , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.07880 , year=

  64. [72]

    Frontiers in Digital Health , volume=

    AI with agency: a vision for adaptive, efficient, and ethical healthcare , author=. Frontiers in Digital Health , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  65. [73]

    biorxiv , year=

    Biomni: A general-purpose biomedical ai agent , author=. biorxiv , year=

  66. [74]

    Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024 , pages=

    TriageAgent: Towards better multi-agents collaborations for large language model-based clinical triage , author=. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024 , pages=

    2024

  67. [75]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.07531 , year=

    Development of a large language model-based multi-agent clinical decision support system for korean triage and acuity scale (ktas)-based triage and treatment planning in emergency departments , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.07531 , year=

  68. [76]

    Journal of medical Internet research , volume=

    Effectiveness of AI-driven conversational agents in improving mental health among young people: systematic review and meta-analysis , author=. Journal of medical Internet research , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  69. [77]

    medRxiv , year=

    AI agents in clinical medicine: a systematic review , author=. medRxiv , year=

  70. [78]

    Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=

    Auto311: A confidence-guided automated system for non-emergency calls , author=. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=

  71. [79]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.11282 , year=

    Multi-AI Complex Systems in Humanitarian Response , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.11282 , year=

  72. [80]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.04388 , year=

    Position: Emergent machina sapiens urge rethinking multi-agent paradigms , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.04388 , year=

  73. [81]

    , author=

    Engineering Socially-Oriented Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. , author=. IJCAI , pages=

  74. [82]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.09890 , year=

    Watch-and-help: A challenge for social perception and human-ai collaboration , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.09890 , year=

    2010

  75. [83]

    Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

    Camel: Communicative agents for" mind" exploration of large language model society , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

  76. [84]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.00289 , year=

    Agentic AI: Autonomy, accountability, and the algorithmic society , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.00289 , year=

  77. [85]

    2025-05-20]

    Simulating human behavior with ai agents , author=. 2025-05-20]. https://hai. stanford. edu/policy/simulatinghuman-behavior-with-ai-agents , year=

    2025

  78. [86]

    LEX LOCALIS--Journal of Local Self-Government , year=

    Agentic AI for Employment: Reducing Unemployment through Intelligent Job-Seeker Support , author=. LEX LOCALIS--Journal of Local Self-Government , year=

  79. [87]

    AI for social good workshop at neural information processing systems 2018 conference , year=

    Emotionally-sensitive AI-driven android interactions improve social welfare through helping people access self-transcendent states , author=. AI for social good workshop at neural information processing systems 2018 conference , year=

    2018

  80. [88]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.01109 , year=

    Platonic Representations for Poverty Mapping: Unified Vision-Language Codes or Agent-Induced Novelty? , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.01109 , year=

  81. [89]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , volume=

    Homophilic effects on economic inequality: A dynamic network agent-based model , author=. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , volume=. 2026 , publisher=

    2026

  82. [90]

    International Workshop on Multi-Agent Systems and Agent-Based Simulation , pages=

    Agent-Based Modelling for Public Social Service Distribution , author=. International Workshop on Multi-Agent Systems and Agent-Based Simulation , pages=. 2025 , organization=

    2025

  83. [91]

    2025 8th International Conference on Computer Information Science and Application Technology (CISAT) , pages=

    AI Agent for Socioeconomic Prediction: Modeling Female-Headed Households in South Africa , author=. 2025 8th International Conference on Computer Information Science and Application Technology (CISAT) , pages=. 2025 , organization=

    2025

  84. [92]

    Procedia Computer Science , volume=

    Combining system dynamics and agent-based simulation to study the effects of public interventions on poverty , author=. Procedia Computer Science , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  85. [93]

    E3S Web of Conferences , volume=

    Territorial inequality: an agent-based approach in modelling of social policy , author=. E3S Web of Conferences , volume=. 2021 , organization=

    2021

  86. [94]

    Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence , volume=

    Engineering pro-sociality with autonomous agents , author=. Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence , volume=

  87. [95]

    Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024 , pages=

    Towards objectively benchmarking social intelligence of language agents at the action level , author=. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024 , pages=

    2024

  88. [96]

    ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter , volume=

    Urban Planning in the Age of Agentic AI: Emerging Paradigms and Prospects , author=. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  89. [97]

    Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems , pages=

    A multi-agent system for automated machine learning , author=. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems , pages=

  90. [98]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.00742 , year=

    Autocurricula and the emergence of innovation from social interaction: A manifesto for multi-agent intelligence research , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.00742 , year=

    1903 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Journal of personalized medicine , volume=

    Early detection of mental health crises through artificial-intelligence-powered social media analysis: A prospective observational study , author=. Journal of personalized medicine , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  92. [100]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.05872 , year=

    Learning to Communicate and Collaborate in a Competitive Multi-Agent Setup to Clean the Ocean from Macroplastics , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.05872 , year=

  93. [101]

    International Conference on Practical Applications of Agents and Multi-Agent Systems , pages=

    Hail: Modular agent-based pedestrian imitation learning , author=. International Conference on Practical Applications of Agents and Multi-Agent Systems , pages=. 2021 , organization=

    2021

  94. [102]

    International Conference on Practical Applications of Agents and Multi-Agent Systems , pages=

    A practical application of market-based mechanisms for allocating harvesting tasks , author=. International Conference on Practical Applications of Agents and Multi-Agent Systems , pages=. 2021 , organization=

    2021

  95. [103]

    International Conference on Practical Applications of Agents and Multi-Agent Systems , pages=

    A Multi-agent Approach for Evacuation Support in Mountainous Areas Using UAV , author=. International Conference on Practical Applications of Agents and Multi-Agent Systems , pages=. 2021 , organization=

    2021

  96. [104]

    International Conference on Practical Applications of Agents and Multi-Agent Systems , pages=

    A Simple Agent Based Modeling Tool for Plastic and Debris Tracking in Oceans , author=. International Conference on Practical Applications of Agents and Multi-Agent Systems , pages=. 2021 , organization=

    2021

  97. [105]

    International Conference on Practical Applications of Agents and Multi-Agent Systems , pages=

    Multi-agent CHANS: BDI farmer intentions and decision making , author=. International Conference on Practical Applications of Agents and Multi-Agent Systems , pages=. 2021 , organization=

    2021

  98. [106]

    bmj , volume=

    The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews , author=. bmj , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2020

  99. [107]

    Nature Communications , volume =

    Toma. Nature Communications , volume =

  100. [108]

    and Taddeo, Mariarosaria , journal =

    Floridi, Luciano and Cowls, Josh and King, Thomas C. and Taddeo, Mariarosaria , journal =. How to Design

  101. [109]

    Nature Communications , volume =

    The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals , author =. Nature Communications , volume =. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  102. [110]

    Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems , volume =

    Human--Agent Collaboration for Disaster Response , author =. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems , volume =

  103. [111]

    Algorithms , volume=

    A research landscape of agentic ai and large language models: Applications, challenges and future directions , author=. Algorithms , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  104. [112]

    Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy , volume=

    Responsible nudging for social good: new healthcare skills for AI-driven digital personal assistants , author=. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  105. [113]

    Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society , pages=

    Always lurking: Understanding and mitigating bias in online human trafficking detection , author=. Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society , pages=

    2018

  106. [114]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.03570 , year=

    Evalai: Towards better evaluation systems for ai agents , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.03570 , year=

    1902 arXiv

  107. [115]

    Ai Magazine , volume=

    Artificial intelligence for social impact: Learning and planning in the data-to-deployment pipeline , author=. Ai Magazine , volume=

  108. [116]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.17669 , year=

    Towards a hipaa compliant agentic ai system in healthcare , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.17669 , year=

  109. [117]

    Frontiers of Computer Science , volume =

    A Survey on Large Language Model Based Autonomous Agents , author =. Frontiers of Computer Science , volume =

  110. [118]

    Multi-level Value Alignment in Agentic

    Zeng, Wei and Zhu, Hengshu and Qin, Chuan and Wu, Han and Cheng, Yihang and Zhang, Sirui and Jin, Xiaowei and Shen, Yinuo and Wang, Zhenxing and Zhong, Feimin and Xiong, Hui , journal =. Multi-level Value Alignment in Agentic

  111. [119]

    Floridi, Luciano and Cowls, Josh and Beltrametti, Monica and Chatila, Raja and Chazerand, Patrice and Dignum, Virginia and Luetge, Christoph and Madelin, Robert and Pagallo, Ugo and Rossi, Francesca and Schafer, Burkhard and Valcke, Peggy and Vayena, Effy , journal =

  112. [120]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.01818 , year=

    Artificial Intelligence for Social Good: A Survey , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.01818 , year=

    2001

  113. [121]

    Science and Engineering Ethics , volume=

    How to Design AI for Social Good: Seven Essential Factors , author=. Science and Engineering Ethics , volume=. 2020 , doi=

    2020

  114. [122]

    Proceedings of the 18th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics , year=

    NLP for Social Good: A Survey and Outlook of Challenges, Opportunities, and Responsible Deployment , author=. Proceedings of the 18th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics , year=

  115. [123]

    Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , pages=

    Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems , author=. Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , pages=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  116. [124]

    Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , pages=

    Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditing , author=. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , pages=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  117. [125]

    Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , pages=

    Improving Fairness in Machine Learning Systems: What Do Industry Practitioners Need? , author=. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , pages=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  118. [126]

    Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society , pages=

    A Participatory Approach Towards AI for Social Good , author=. Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society , pages=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  119. [127]

    2019 , url=

    Green, Ben , booktitle=. 2019 , url=

    2019

  120. [128]

    Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization , pages=

    Power to the People? Opportunities and Challenges for Participatory AI , author=. Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization , pages=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  121. [129]

    1999 , publisher=

    Development as Freedom , author=. 1999 , publisher=

    1999

  122. [130]

    2011 , publisher=

    Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach , author=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  123. [131]

    2007 , publisher=

    Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing , author=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  124. [132]

    Philosophy & Technology , volume=

    Decolonial AI: Decolonial Theory as Sociotechnical Foresight in Artificial Intelligence , author=. Philosophy & Technology , volume=. 2020 , doi=

    2020

  125. [133]

    Patterns , volume=

    Algorithmic Injustice: A Relational Ethics Approach , author=. Patterns , volume=. 2021 , doi=

    2021

  126. [134]

    2009 , publisher=

    An Introduction to MultiAgent Systems , author=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  127. [135]

    Autonomous Robots , volume=

    Multiagent Systems: A Survey from a Machine Learning Perspective , author=. Autonomous Robots , volume=. 2000 , doi=

    2000

  128. [136]

    2011 , publisher=

    Security and Game Theory: Algorithms, Deployed Systems, Lessons Learned , author=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  129. [137]

    International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

    ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models , author=. International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

  130. [138]

    Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology , year=

    Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior , author=. Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology , year=

  131. [139]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.07864 , year=

    The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.07864 , year=

    arXiv

  132. [140]

    Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , pages=

    System Safety and Artificial Intelligence , author=. Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , pages=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  133. [141]

    Health Promotion Practice , volume =

    Wallerstein, Nina and Duran, Bonnie , title =. Health Promotion Practice , volume =. 2006 , doi =

    2006

  134. [142]

    Datasheets for Datasets , journal =

    Gebru, Timnit and Morgenstern, Jamie and Vecchione, Briana and Vaughan, Jennifer Wortman and Wallach, Hanna and Daum. Datasheets for Datasets , journal =. 2021 , doi =

    2021

  135. [143]

    Communications of the ACM , volume =

    Diakopoulos, Nicholas , title =. Communications of the ACM , volume =. 2016 , doi =

    2016

  136. [144]

    Science , volume =

    Obermeyer, Ziad and Powers, Brian and Vogeli, Christine and Mullainathan, Sendhil , title =. Science , volume =. 2019 , doi =

    2019

  137. [145]

    and Ajmeri, Nirav and Jonker, Catholijn M

    Murukannaiah, Pradeep K. and Ajmeri, Nirav and Jonker, Catholijn M. and Singh, Munindar P. , title =. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS) , year =

  138. [146]

    Humanitarian health computing using artificial intelligence and social media , journal =

    Fern. Humanitarian health computing using artificial intelligence and social media , journal =. 2018 , doi =

    2018

  139. [147]

    Communication, Simulation, and Intelligent Agents: Implications of Personal Intelligent Machines for Medical Education

    Clancey, William J. Communication, Simulation, and Intelligent Agents: Implications of Personal Intelligent Machines for Medical Education. Proceedings of the Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-83)

  140. [148]

    Classification Problem Solving

    Clancey, William J. Classification Problem Solving. Proceedings of the Fourth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

  141. [149]

    , title =

    Robinson, Arthur L. , title =. 1980 , doi =. https://science.sciencemag.org/content/208/4447/1019.full.pdf , journal =

    1980

  142. [150]

    New Ways to Make Microcircuits Smaller---Duplicate Entry

    Robinson, Arthur L. New Ways to Make Microcircuits Smaller---Duplicate Entry. Science

  143. [151]

    Clancey and Glenn Rennels , abstract =

    Diane Warner Hasling and William J. Clancey and Glenn Rennels , abstract =. Strategic explanations for a diagnostic consultation system , journal =. 1984 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7373(84)80003-6 , url =

    1984 doi

  144. [152]

    and Rennels, Glenn R

    Hasling, Diane Warner and Clancey, William J. and Rennels, Glenn R. and Test, Thomas. Strategic Explanations in Consultation---Duplicate. The International Journal of Man-Machine Studies

  145. [153]

    Poligon: A System for Parallel Problem Solving

    Rice, James. Poligon: A System for Parallel Problem Solving

  146. [154]

    Transfer of Rule-Based Expertise through a Tutorial Dialogue

    Clancey, William J. Transfer of Rule-Based Expertise through a Tutorial Dialogue

  147. [155]

    The Engineering of Qualitative Models

    Clancey, William J. The Engineering of Qualitative Models

  148. [156]

    2017 , eprint=

    Attention Is All You Need , author=. 2017 , eprint=

    2017

  149. [157]

    Pluto: The 'Other' Red Planet

    NASA. Pluto: The 'Other' Red Planet

Pith tools

Reviewed May 25, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.