Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 54 references

First next-to-leading-order SCET sum rules for B decays into the two axial-vector D1 mesons give R(D1)≈0.07 and R(D1')≈0.16.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-13 02:02 UTC pith:TZZCZQVE

load-bearing objection First NLO SCET LCSRs for the mixed D1/D1' form factors; solid technical extension, but the overall scale still rides on tree-level EOM decay constants. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.09573 v1 pith:TZZCZQVE submitted 2026-07-10 hep-ph hep-exhep-lat

SCET sum rules for Bto D₁(2420) and Bto D₁'(2430) form factors at next-to-leading order

Jun-Wei Zhang , Yong-Kang Huang This is my paper
classification hep-ph hep-exhep-lat
keywords SCETlight-cone sum rulesB to D1 form factorslepton flavor universalityR(D1)R(D1')P-wave charm mesonsBCL parameterization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Semileptonic B decays into the orbitally excited charm mesons D1(2420) and D1'(2430) are needed both to close the inclusive b o c rate and to control feed-down backgrounds that affect R(D(*)) extractions. This paper supplies the first next-to-leading-order calculation of the relevant transition form factors inside soft-collinear effective theory. The QCD currents are matched onto SCET operators, the resulting vacuum-to-B correlation functions are factorized into jet functions and B-meson light-cone distribution amplitudes, and dedicated linear combinations of interpolating currents are used to separate the two nearly degenerate axial-vector states. Ground-state contamination is removed by subtraction, the finite-charm-mass longitudinal form factor is kept, and the form factors are extrapolated across the full kinematic range with a BCL series. The resulting lepton-flavor-universality ratios are R(D1)=0.070+0.028-0.018 and R(D1')=0.159+0.032-0.025, ready for direct comparison with future Belle II and LHCb data.

Core claim

At O(αs) the SCET light-cone sum rules for the effective form factors ξ R∥/⊥ and Ξ R∥/⊥ (R=D1,D1'), including the additional longitudinal piece ξ R∥,mc generated by the finite charm mass, yield physical form factors whose BCL extrapolation produces the lepton-flavor-universality ratios R(D1)=0.070+0.028-0.018 and R(D1')=0.159+0.032-0.025.

What carries the argument

Leading-power SCET factorization formulae for the vacuum-to-B correlation functions, combined with linear combinations of interpolating currents that project onto a single physical D1 or D1' state and with subsequent subtraction of the ground-state poles.

Load-bearing premise

The eight decay constants that normalize the state-separating currents are fixed by tree-level equations of motion relating them to four earlier sum-rule numbers; large corrections to those relations would shift every form factor and both R ratios.

What would settle it

A direct experimental measurement of R(D1) or R(D1') at Belle II or LHCb that lies outside the predicted intervals 0.070+0.028-0.018 and 0.159+0.032-0.025, or a lattice determination of the same form factors at large recoil that disagrees with the sum-rule central values after the same BCL extrapolation.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The predicted branching fractions of order 10-3 for the light-lepton modes can be used to quantify residual D** feed-down in R(D(*)) analyses.
  • The two distinct R ratios supply concrete targets for forthcoming Belle II and LHCb measurements of excited-charm LFU.
  • The same SCET sum-rule infrastructure can be reused for the remaining P-wave states D0* and D2* once analogous interpolating currents are constructed.
  • Explicit subtraction of lattice D(*) poles would eliminate the dual continuum approximation for the ground state and reduce the present theoretical error.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the two R ratios differ by more than a factor of two, a combined fit to both channels could constrain residual HQS-breaking mixing between the j=1/2 and j=3/2 doublets.
  • The large sensitivity of the overall normalization to the decay constants of the interpolating currents suggests that a dedicated lattice calculation of those matrix elements would immediately shrink the uncertainty bands on both ratios.
  • The finite-mc longitudinal form factor, which depends only on φ B+, offers a clean cross-check of the B-meson LCDA once the physical form factors are measured differentially.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents the first O(αs) calculation of the B o D1(2420) and B o D'1(2430) transition form factors in the SCET light-cone sum-rule framework. QCD heavy-to-light currents are matched onto SCETI (including the finite-mc A1 operator that generates ξ R∥,mc), the vacuum-to-B correlation functions are factorized in SCETII, and leading-power sum rules are obtained for the effective form factors ξ R∥/⊥ and Ξ R∥/⊥. Dedicated linear combinations of interpolating currents disentangle the two axial-vector states; ground-state contamination is removed by subtracting the corresponding B o D(*) sum rules. After Borel and continuum subtraction, the form factors are extrapolated over the full kinematic range with a BCL z-expansion and used to predict branching fractions, differential widths, and the LFU ratios R(D1)=0.070+0.028-0.018 and R(D'1)=0.159+0.032-0.025.

Significance. If the results hold, the work supplies the first NLO SCET LCSR determination of the B o D(**)1 form factors that enter both the saturation of inclusive B o Xcℓ u and the feed-down background for R(D(*)). The explicit one-loop jet functions, the recovery of the large-energy relations, the finite-mc longitudinal form factor that depends only on φB+, and the stability plots under Borel and threshold variations constitute concrete technical advances over the existing tree-level LCSR analysis. The LFU ratios are falsifiable predictions for Belle II and LHCb and are less sensitive to overall normalization than the absolute branching fractions.

major comments (2)
  1. Sec. 4.1, Eqs. (4.1)–(4.3): the eight decay constants {f1,2,g1,2,h1,2,r1,2} that fix the overall normalization of every sum rule (e.g. (3.63)–(3.64), (3.81)–(3.82), (3.87)–(3.90)) are obtained from tree-level QCD equations of motion applied to four numbers taken from an earlier tree-level LCSR paper. The manuscript itself identifies these constants as the dominant uncertainty source (Sec. 4.2), yet provides no estimate of O(αs) or higher-twist corrections to the EOMs. Because any such correction rescales all form factors (and both R ratios) by an amount comparable to the quoted bands, a quantitative assessment or an enlarged systematic is required before the numerical claims can be regarded as robust.
  2. Sec. 3.2, Eqs. (3.59)–(3.62): isolation of the P-wave poles relies on subtracting a separate ground-state sum rule that employs its own continuum threshold s0. The procedure introduces an additional duality approximation whose size is not quantified beyond the mild s0 variation shown in Fig. 7. Given that the same correlation functions couple to both ground and excited states, a clearer error budget for residual ground-state leakage (or an alternative subtraction that uses known D(*) residues) is needed to support the claim that the extracted form factors are free of ground-state contamination.
minor comments (4)
  1. Table 2 lists the eight decay constants as “This Work” while the text states they are obtained from EOMs applied to inputs of Ref. [27]; the provenance should be clarified.
  2. Figs. 6 and 7 would benefit from explicit labels of which form factor is plotted in each panel; the present captions are generic.
  3. The BCL fit is performed only at five discrete q2 points inside the large-recoil window; a short statement on the sensitivity of the extrapolated bands to the choice of those points would improve transparency.
  4. Notation for the two continuum thresholds (s0,s1 versus ωs,0,ωs,1) is switched between the text and the figures; a uniform convention would help the reader.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: NLO SCET jet functions, sum rules, and R ratios are computed from external inputs and standard techniques without self-referential reduction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is a standard SCET matching + LCSR construction: QCD currents are matched onto SCET_I operators (including the finite-m_c A1 term), vacuum-to-B correlation functions are factorized in SCET_II into jet functions (computed at one loop) times B-meson LCDAs, spectral densities are matched to hadronic poles after continuum subtraction and Borel transform, and the resulting large-recoil form factors are BCL-extrapolated to obtain branching fractions and R ratios. All numerical inputs (LCDA moments, f_B, quark masses, and the four decay constants taken from the independent tree-level LCSR analysis of Gubernari et al.) are external literature values; the eight combination coefficients are then fixed by tree-level QCD EOMs, which is an input choice rather than a self-definition of the target form factors. Sum-rule parameters (M^2, s_0, s_1) are varied for stability windows, not fitted to any experimental R or branching-fraction data. The ground-state subtraction uses the same OPE spectral density with two thresholds—an ordinary continuum-subtraction device, not a tautology that forces the P-wave residues. BCL coefficients are fitted only to the authors’ own LCSR points and then used for extrapolation; this is ordinary z-expansion practice and does not make the integrated R ratios circular. No uniqueness theorem, ansatz, or load-bearing result is imported solely from overlapping-author citations in a way that collapses the claimed NLO prediction onto its inputs. The calculation is therefore self-contained as a theoretical computation; residual uncertainties (especially from the tree-level EOMs) are correctness/systematic issues, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The calculation rests on the standard SCET power counting and on a set of non-perturbative inputs (B-meson LCDAs, decay constants fixed by tree-level EOMs, Borel and continuum thresholds chosen for stability). No new dynamical entities are postulated; the free parameters are the usual sum-rule and LCDA parameters whose variation is already folded into the quoted errors.

free parameters (4)
  • Borel parameter M^{2} = 6.5 ± 0.5 GeV^{2}
    Central value 6.5 GeV^{2} with ±0.5 GeV^{2} variation chosen so that the form factors are stable (Sec. 4.1, Fig. 6); not derived from first principles.
  • continuum thresholds s0, s1 = s0=5.0±0.5, s1=9.0±0.6 GeV^{2}
    s0 = 5.0 ± 0.5 GeV^{2} and s1 = 9.0 ± 0.6 GeV^{2} fixed by the mass gap between ground and P-wave states and by the expected location of the 2P excitations (Sec. 4.1).
  • B-meson LCDA parameters λ B, λ E^{2}, λ H^{2}, σ1, σ2 = λ B=0.46±0.11 GeV etc.
    Taken from external fits and models (Table 2); their uncertainties dominate part of the final error budget.
  • decay-constant inputs fD1, fD1', gD1, gD1' = from Ref. [27]
    Numerical values adopted from the tree-level LCSR of Gubernari et al. (2022) and then converted via tree-level EOMs (Eqs. (4.3)).
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Leading-power SCET factorization of the vacuum-to-B correlation functions into jet functions and B-meson LCDAs remains valid for the orbitally excited final states at the hard-collinear scale.
    Invoked throughout Secs. 2–3; higher-power and higher-twist corrections are neglected.
  • ad hoc to paper Tree-level QCD equations of motion relate the eight decay constants of the interpolating currents to the four numbers taken from an earlier paper.
    Sec. 4.1, Eqs. (4.1)–(4.3); higher-order corrections to the EOMs are not estimated.
  • domain assumption Quark-hadron duality after Borel transformation and continuum subtraction isolates the desired P-wave poles once the ground-state contribution has been subtracted.
    Standard LCSR assumption used in Eqs. (3.59)–(3.62).
  • domain assumption The BCL z-expansion truncated at O(z) with the lowest Bc pole masses adequately describes the form factors over the full kinematic range.
    Sec. 4.2; higher-order z terms and possible additional poles are omitted.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 38869 in / 3512 out tokens · 42221 ms · 2026-07-13T02:02:05.157630+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We present the first calculation of the $B \to D_1(2420)$ and $B \to D'_1(2430)$ transition form factors at ${\cal O}(\alpha_s)$ using light-cone sum rules within the framework of soft-collinear effective theory (SCET). We first match the QCD transition currents onto ${\rm SCET_I}$ and then factorize the corresponding vacuum-to-$B$-meson correlation functions in ${\rm SCET_{II}}$. The resulting factorization formulae are used to construct the leading-power sum rules for the effective SCET form factors $\xi^R_{\parallel/\perp}$ and $\Xi^R_{\parallel/\perp}$ ($R=D_1,D'_1$). In particular, we calculate the additional longitudinal form factor $\xi^R_{\parallel,m_c}$ induced by the finite charm-quark mass, whose contribution depends only on the $B$-meson light-cone distribution amplitude $\phi_B^+(\omega,\mu)$. To disentangle the mixed $D_1$ and $D'_1$ states, we introduce dedicated combinations of interpolating currents, with their decay constants determined via the equations of motion. To isolate the orbitally excited states from ground-state contamination, we subtract the ground-state contribution from the total sum rules and examine the stability of the resulting sum rules. Furthermore, the $q^2$-dependence of the physical form factors is extrapolated over the full kinematic region using the Bourrely--Caprini--Lellouch parameterization. Finally, we provide phenomenological predictions for the branching fractions, differential decay widths, and lepton flavor universality ratios. Numerically, we obtain $R(D_1) = 0.070^{+0.028}_{-0.018}$ and $R(D'_1) = 0.159^{+0.032}_{-0.025}$, which can be confronted with the future measurements at Belle~II and LHCb.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 43 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Gambino et al.,Challenges in semileptonicBdecays,Eur

    P. Gambino et al.,Challenges in semileptonicBdecays,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 966 [2006.07287]. [2]Fermilab Lattice, MILCcollaboration,B→Dℓνform factors at nonzero recoil and|V cb| from2 + 1-flavor lattice QCD,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 034506 [1503.07237]. [3]Fermilab Lattice, MILCcollaboration,Semileptonic form factors forB→D ∗ℓνat nonzero recoil from2 + 1-flav...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  2. [2]

    Faller, A

    S. Faller, A. Khodjamirian, C. Klein and T. Mannel,B→D(∗) form factors from QCD light-cone sum rules,Eur. Phys. J. C60(2009) 603 [0809.0222]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  3. [3]

    Wang, Y.-B

    Y.-M. Wang, Y.-B. Wei, Y.-L. Shen and C.-D. Lü,Perturbative corrections toB→Dform factors in QCD,JHEP06(2017) 062 [1701.06810]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  4. [4]

    J. Gao, T. Huber, Y. Ji, C. Wang, Y.-M. Wang and Y.-B. Wei,B→Dℓνℓ form factors beyond leading power and extraction of|Vcb|andR(D),JHEP05(2022) 024 [2112.12674]. [9]Particle Data Groupcollaboration,Review of particle physics,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 030001

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    Neubert,Heavy quark symmetry,Phys

    M. Neubert,Heavy quark symmetry,Phys. Rept.245(1994) 259 [hep-ph/9306320]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  6. [6]

    Isgur and M.B

    N. Isgur and M.B. Wise,Spectroscopy with heavy quark symmetry,Phys. Rev. Lett.66(1991) 1130

    1991

  7. [7]

    M. Lu, M.B. Wise and N. Isgur,Heavy quark symmetry andD1(2420)→D ∗πdecay,Phys. Rev. D45(1992) 1553

    1992

  8. [8]

    Suzuki,Strange axial - vector mesons,Phys

    M. Suzuki,Strange axial - vector mesons,Phys. Rev. D47(1993) 1252

    1993

  9. [9]

    Cheng,Revisiting Axial-Vector Meson Mixing,Phys

    H.-Y. Cheng,Revisiting Axial-Vector Meson Mixing,Phys. Lett. B707(2012) 116 [1110.2249]. [15]BaBarcollaboration,Evidence for an excess of ¯B→D (∗)τ −¯ντ decays,Phys. Rev. Lett.109 (2012) 101802 [1205.5442]. [16]Bellecollaboration,Measurement ofR(D)andR(D ∗)with a semileptonic tagging method, 1904.08794

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  10. [10]

    Michael,Adjoint Sources in Lattice Gauge Theory,Nucl

    C. Michael,Adjoint Sources in Lattice Gauge Theory,Nucl. Phys. B259(1985) 58

    1985

  11. [11]

    Luscher and U

    M. Luscher and U. Wolff,Elastic scattering matrix from finite-volume simulations,Nucl. Phys. B339(1990) 222

    1990

  12. [12]

    Blossier, M

    B. Blossier, M. Della Morte, G. von Hippel, T. Mendes and R. Sommer,Generalized eigenvalue method for energies and matrix elements,JHEP04(2009) 094 [0902.1265]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  13. [13]

    Barca,Current-enhanced excited states in lattice QCD three-point functions,Phys

    L. Barca,Current-enhanced excited states in lattice QCD three-point functions,Phys. Rev. D 112(2025) L091503 [2508.09006]. – 37 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Briceno, J.J

    R.A. Briceno, J.J. Dudek and R.D. Young,Scattering processes and resonances from lattice QCD,Rev. Mod. Phys.90(2018) 025001 [1706.06223]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  15. [15]

    Beneke and T

    M. Beneke and T. Feldmann,Factorization of heavy-to-light form factors in soft-collinear effective theory,Nucl. Phys. B685(2004) 249 [hep-ph/0311335]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  16. [16]

    Bauer, D

    C.W. Bauer, D. Pirjol and I.W. Stewart,Soft collinear factorization in effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 054022 [hep-ph/0109045]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  17. [17]

    Gao, C.-D

    J. Gao, C.-D. Lü, Y.-L. Shen, Y.-M. Wang and Y.-B. Wei,Precision calculations ofB→V form factors from soft-collinear effective theory sum rules on the light-cone,Phys. Rev. D 101(2020) 074035 [1907.11092]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  18. [18]

    Cui, Y.-K

    B.-Y. Cui, Y.-K. Huang, Y.-L. Shen, C. Wang and Y.-M. Wang,Precision calculations of Bd,s →π, Kdecay form factors in soft-collinear effective theory,JHEP03(2023) 140 [2212.11624]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  19. [19]

    Cui, Y.-K

    B.-Y. Cui, Y.-K. Huang, Y.-M. Wang and X.-C. Zhao,Shedding new light onR(D(∗) (s))and |Vcb|from semileptonic ¯B(s) →D (∗) (s) ℓ¯νℓ decays, 2023

    2023

  20. [20]

    Gubernari, A

    N. Gubernari, A. Khodjamirian, R. Mandal and T. Mannel,B→D1(2420)and B→D ′ 1(2430)form factors from QCD light-cone sum rules,JHEP05(2022) 029 [2203.08493]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  21. [21]

    Beneke and T

    M. Beneke and T. Feldmann,Symmetry-breaking corrections to heavy-to-lightB-meson form factors at large recoil,Nuclear Physics B592(2001) 3–34

    2001

  22. [22]

    Beneke and D

    M. Beneke and D. Yang,Heavy-to-lightBmeson form-factors at large recoil energy: Spectator-scattering corrections,Nucl. Phys. B736(2006) 34 [hep-ph/0508250]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  23. [23]

    Becher and R.J

    T. Becher and R.J. Hill,Loop corrections to heavy-to-light form factors and evanescent operators in SCET,Journal of High Energy Physics2004(2004) 055–055

    2004

  24. [24]

    R.J. Hill, T. Becher, S.J. Lee and M. Neubert,Sudakov resummation for subleading SCET currents and heavy-to-light form-factors,JHEP07(2004) 081 [hep-ph/0404217]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  25. [25]

    Burdman and G

    G. Burdman and G. Hiller,Semileptonic form factors fromB→K ∗γdecays in the large energy limit,Phys. Rev. D63(2001) 113008 [hep-ph/0011266]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  26. [26]

    Beneke and T

    M. Beneke and T. Feldmann,Multipole-expanded soft-collinear effective theory with non-Abelian gauge symmetry,Physics Letters B553(2003) 267–276

    2003

  27. [27]

    H. Boos, T. Feldmann, T. Mannel and B.D. Pecjak,Shape functions from¯B→X cℓ¯νℓ,Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 036003 [hep-ph/0504005]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  28. [28]

    Leibovich, Z

    A.K. Leibovich, Z. Ligeti and M.B. Wise,Comment on Quark Masses in SCET,Phys. Lett. B564(2003) 231 [hep-ph/0303099]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  29. [29]

    Grozin and M

    A.G. Grozin and M. Neubert,Asymptotics of heavy-meson form factors,Physical Review D 55(1997) 272–290

    1997

  30. [30]

    Beneke, M

    M. Beneke, M. Garny, R. Szafron and J. Wang,Anomalous dimension of subleading-power N-jet operators. Part II,JHEP11(2018) 112 [1808.04742]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  31. [31]

    Beneke and J

    M. Beneke and J. Rohrwild,B meson distribution amplitude fromB→γℓν,Eur. Phys. J. C 71(2011) 1818 [1110.3228]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  32. [32]

    Broadhurst and A.G

    D.J. Broadhurst and A.G. Grozin,Two loop renormalization of the effective field theory of a static quark,Phys. Lett. B267(1991) 105 [hep-ph/9908362]. – 38 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1991

  33. [33]

    Ji and M.J

    X.-D. Ji and M.J. Musolf,Subleading logarithmic mass dependence in heavy meson form-factors,Phys. Lett. B257(1991) 409

    1991

  34. [34]

    Broadhurst and A.G

    D.J. Broadhurst and A.G. Grozin,Matching QCD and HQET heavy-light currents at two loops and beyond,Phys. Rev. D52(1995) 4082 [hep-ph/9410240]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  35. [35]

    Bourrely and I

    C. Bourrely and I. Caprini,Bounds on scalarKπform factors at zero momentum transfer, Nucl. Phys. B722(2005) 149 [hep-ph/0504016]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  36. [36]

    Lellouch,Lattice constrained unitarity bounds for¯B0 →π +ℓ−¯νℓ decays,Nucl

    L. Lellouch,Lattice constrained unitarity bounds for¯B0 →π +ℓ−¯νℓ decays,Nucl. Phys. B 479(1996) 353 [hep-ph/9509358]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  37. [37]

    Bourrely, I

    C. Bourrely, I. Caprini and L. Lellouch,Model-independent description ofB→πℓνdecays and a determination of|Vub|,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 013008 [0807.2722]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  38. [38]

    Beneke, A

    M. Beneke, A. Maier, J. Piclum and T. Rauh,The bottom-quark mass from non-relativistic sum rules at NNNLO,Nucl. Phys. B891(2015) 42 [1411.3132]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  39. [39]

    Braun, D.Y

    V.M. Braun, D.Y. Ivanov and G.P. Korchemsky,TheBmeson distribution amplitude in QCD,Phys. Rev. D69(2004) 034014 [hep-ph/0309330]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  40. [40]

    Beneke, C

    M. Beneke, C. Bobeth and Y.-M. Wang,Bd,s →γℓ ¯ℓdecay with an energetic photon,JHEP 12(2020) 148 [2008.12494]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  41. [41]

    Beneke, V.M

    M. Beneke, V.M. Braun, Y. Ji and Y.-B. Wei,Radiative leptonic decayB→γℓνℓ with subleading power corrections,JHEP07(2018) 154 [1804.04962]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  42. [42]

    Chetyrkin, J.H

    K.G. Chetyrkin, J.H. Kuhn and M. Steinhauser,RunDec: running and decoupling of the strong coupling and quark masses,Comput. Phys. Commun.133(2000) 43 [hep-ph/0004189]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  43. [43]

    Herren and M

    F. Herren and M. Steinhauser,Version 3 of RunDec and CRunDec,Comput. Phys. Commun.224(2018) 333 [1703.03751]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  44. [44]

    Schmidt and M

    B. Schmidt and M. Steinhauser,CRunDec: running and decoupling of the strong coupling and quark masses,Comput. Phys. Commun.183(2012) 1845 [1201.6149]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  45. [45]

    Shen, Y.-M

    Y.-L. Shen, Y.-M. Wang and Y.-B. Wei,Double radiative bottom-meson decays in SCET, JHEP12(2020) 169 [2009.02723]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  46. [46]

    Beneke,A Quark mass definition adequate for threshold problems,Phys

    M. Beneke,A Quark mass definition adequate for threshold problems,Phys. Lett. B434 (1998) 115 [hep-ph/9804241]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  47. [47]

    Bigi, M.A

    I.I.Y. Bigi, M.A. Shifman, N.G. Uraltsev and A.I. Vainshtein,The Pole mass of the heavy quark. Perturbation theory and beyond,Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 2234 [hep-ph/9402360]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  48. [48]

    Beneke and V.M

    M. Beneke and V.M. Braun,Renormalons, pole masses and residual masses in HQET,Nucl. Phys. B426(1994) 301 [hep-ph/9402364]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  49. [49]

    G. Bell, T. Feldmann, Y.-M. Wang and M.W.Y. Yip,Light-Cone Distribution Amplitudes for Heavy-Quark Hadrons,JHEP11(2013) 191 [1308.6114]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  50. [50]

    Wang and Y.-L

    Y.-M. Wang and Y.-L. Shen,QCD corrections toB→πform factors from light-cone sum rules,Nucl. Phys. B898(2015) 563 [1506.00667]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  51. [51]

    Wang,Factorization and dispersion relations for radiative leptonicBdecay,JHEP09 (2016) 159 [1606.03080]

    Y.-M. Wang,Factorization and dispersion relations for radiative leptonicBdecay,JHEP09 (2016) 159 [1606.03080]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  52. [52]

    Wang and Y.-L

    Y.-M. Wang and Y.-L. Shen,Subleading-power corrections to the radiative leptonicB→γℓν decay in QCD,JHEP05(2018) 184 [1803.06667]. – 39 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  53. [53]

    Wang, Y.-M

    C. Wang, Y.-M. Wang and Y.-B. Wei,QCD factorization for the four-body leptonicB-meson decays,JHEP02(2022) 141 [2111.11811]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  54. [54]

    Feldmann, P

    T. Feldmann, P. Lüghausen and D. van Dyk,Systematic parametrization of the leading B-meson light-cone distribution amplitude,JHEP10(2022) 162 [2203.15679]. – 40 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022