Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 33 references

VidSketch: Hand-drawn Sketch-Driven Video Generation with Diffusion Control

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read VidSketch generates video animations directly from any number of hand-drawn sketches plus a text prompt, adapting guidance strength to the sketch's abstraction level and keeping frames consistent over time.

desk verdict A plausible but sloppy system paper: the multi-sketch video workflow is new and the qualitative results look promising, but the abstraction-control score appears internally inconsistent and the evaluation is too under-specified to verify the central claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.01101 v2 pith:U2TQJJWD submitted 2025-02-03 cs.CV cs.AI

Lifan Jiang , Shuang Chen , Boxi Wu , Xiaotong Guan , Jiahui Zhang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CVcs.AI
keywords sketch-drivenvideogenerationdiffusionmodelshand-drawnsketchanimationabstractionlevelspatiotemporalconsistencyT2I-Adapterlevel-basedcontroltext-to-video
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

VidSketch sets out to close the gap the authors see between sketch-to-image and sketch-to-video generation: they claim their method is the first to turn hand-drawn sketch sequences — any number of them, drawn by hands of any skill level — together with a short text prompt into a high-quality, temporally consistent animated video. The stakes are practical: sketching is the most intuitive way for a non-expert to specify what a video should contain, and previous sketch-driven diffusion models stop at static images. The paper argues that making this work requires solving two problems that image generation does not face: how strongly the sketch should steer generation, which must depend on how abstract the drawing is, and how to keep frames coherent across time. VidSketch answers the first with its Level-Based Sketch Control Strategy, which scores abstraction from a sketch's continuity, connectivity, and texture detail and converts that score into an adapter scale and an injection threshold; it answers the second with a TempSpatial Attention mechanism that ties each frame to the first, second, and preceding frames during denoising.

What carries the argument

Three named mechanisms carry the argument. The Level-Based Sketch Control Strategy (LBSC) is the auto-tuning core: it derives an abstraction score from three normalized component scores — continuity $A_C$ (a contour area-to-perimeter ratio computed with connected-component analysis and the Suzuki border-following algorithm, normalized by image area and perimeter), connectivity $A_L$ (the count of 8-connected components found by depth-first search), and texture detail $A_T$ (averaged contrast, dissimilarity, and homogeneity from a gray-level co-occurrence matrix) — combined as $S_C = w_C A_C + w_L A_L + w_T A_T$. That score is mapped through a hand-picked piecewise rule in Appendix A.4 to the adapter scale $s$ and the diffusion-stage threshold $\tau$, which decide how strongly the inflated T2I-Adapter's residual $R = s \cdot A_{\mathrm{Inflated}}(F_{\mathrm{final}})$ is added to the hidden states and from which timestep onward. The TempSpatial Attention mechanism (TSA) replaces each frame $i$'s attention key and value set with the concatenated keys and values of frame 1, frame 2, and frame $i-1$, so every frame is continually re-anchored to the video's opening and its immediate past. The first-frame-preserving diffusion schedule — a Dirac delta on $x_{1,t}$ so the user-derived first frame never receives noise, with the noise-prediction loss applied only to $f > 1$ — supplies the long-range anchor that makes the other two mechanisms effective.

What would settle it

Take a fixed prompt and a corpus of sketches of the same scene drawn at systematically varied abstraction levels (rough scribble, loose gesture, clean line art, shaded). For each sketch, compute the paper's scores $A_C$, $A_L$, $A_T$, generate the video with the Level-Based control active, and have human raters score sketch-to-video fidelity and overall quality. The claim is falsified if fidelity ratings do not track the mapping — for instance, if a sketch the strategy labels abstract (low $s$, late $\tau$) yields visibly weaker sketch adherence than the same sketch with stronger control, or if two sketches humans rank equally abstract land in different mapping brackets — and any such test currently requires guessing the unpublished weights $w_C$, $w_L$, $w_T$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's discovery is a complete recipe for sketch-conditioned video generation. From a text-to-video diffusion backbone, VidSketch inflates the T2I-Adapter conditioning model to the temporal dimension and injects its scaled output $R = s \cdot A_{\mathrm{Inflated}}(F_{\mathrm{final}})$ into the denoiser's upsampling layers, where $F_{\mathrm{final}}$ is the user's sketch sequence with linearly interpolated intermediate frames. The first frame is held frozen through every diffusion timestep — noise is added only to frames $f > 1$, and the training loss scores only those later frames — which gives the generation a fixed reference. The Level-Based Sketch Control Strategy computes an abstraction score $S_C = w_C A_C + w_L A_L + w_T A_T$ from contour continuity, connected-component count, and gray-level co-occurrence texture features, then maps that score through a fixed three-step rule to the adapter scale $s$ and the injection threshold $\tau$, so that rougher, more abstract doodles steer the generation less than detailed line art. The TempSpatial Attention mechanism computes each frame's attention with key and value tokens drawn from the first frame, the second frame, and the immediately preceding frame, a design the ablations credit with removing screen tearing and preserving inter-frame consistency. The paper reports that with these components it outperforms IP-Adapter, ControlNet, and T2I-Adapter on VBench metrics and in a 42-participant user study across aesthetics, consistency, smoothness, stability, and detail richness.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a sketch's abstraction level — and therefore the right strength of guidance — is faithfully captured by the weighted sum of continuity, connectivity, and texture scores in Eq. 11, where the paper never states the weights, and that the fixed piecewise mapping from that score to the adapter scale $s$ and threshold $\tau$ holds across every drawing style.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Anyone who can sketch a few keyframes and type a short prompt can produce an animated video; animation creation no longer requires rigging, keyframe software, or professional editing skills.
  • Because guidance strength adjusts automatically, one method serves users of very different drawing abilities — rough doodles steer weakly and detailed line art steers strongly — rather than requiring a manually tuned control knob per user.
  • A sketch sequence of any length, not just a single first frame, can carry the structure of an animation, with linear interpolation bridging between user-supplied keyframes.
  • Keeping the first frame noiseless through the diffusion process and scoring only later frames in the training loss is what lets an existing video diffusion model be adapted for this task on very small per-category datasets.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the three-step mapping from abstraction score to control strength appears hand-chosen, so fitting a continuous mapping to human-ranked sketches would likely generalize to drawing styles the fixed thresholds miss.
  • Editorial inference: the continuity-connectivity-texture scoring could serve as a general quality filter for other conditioning signals whose reliability varies from input to input, such as depth maps, edge maps, or pose sequences.
  • Editorial inference: because training used only 8–12 videos per action category, the reported consistency gains may be tied to those small, homogeneous datasets; training the same modules on larger, more varied motion corpora is a direct test of whether the gains scale.
  • Editorial inference: the 'any number of sketches' claim depends on linear interpolation between user frames, so very sparse keyframe sequences probably expose the method's practical limit; a comparison with two versus eight keyframes per prompt would map it.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes VidSketch, a video-generation method that takes hand-drawn sketch sequences and a text prompt as input and produces short video animations. The method is built on a pretrained diffusion video model, uses an inflated T2I-Adapter to inject sketch features, and introduces two new components: a Level-Based Sketch Control (LBSC) strategy, which estimates an abstraction score from continuity, connectivity, and texture statistics and maps that score to an adapter scale and injection threshold, and a TempSpatial Attention (TSA) mechanism, which mixes keys/values from the first, second, and previous frames into the attention computation for the current frame. The authors report quantitative comparisons using VBench metrics, PickScore, and MSE, plus a user study, and claim that VidSketch is the first method to generate high-quality video animation directly from arbitrary hand-drawn sketches and simple text prompts.

Significance. If the method performs as claimed, it would address a real gap: enabling non-expert users to animate rough sketches without professional skills. The paper describes a complete pipeline, and the qualitative examples across several styles are plausible. The TempSpatial Attention design is a reasonable adaptation of attention mechanisms to temporal consistency. However, the central LBSC component currently contains an internally inconsistent formula and unspecified parameters, and the quantitative evaluation has comparability gaps. The significance is therefore conditional on substantial revision and re-validation.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.2.1, Eq. (8)] The continuity score AC = S·Pmax/(Smax·P) is inconsistent with the accompanying text. The text states that lower AC corresponds to stronger continuity and less abstraction, but the area-to-perimeter ratio S/P is large for compact filled shapes and small for thin stroke-like contours. For a filled 5×5 square in a 10×10 canvas, AC = (25·40)/(100·20) = 0.5, while a 10-pixel line yields AC ≈ 0.18, so the formula labels the more detailed filled shape as more abstract. Because Eq. (11) forms SC as a weighted sum and Appendix A.4 maps SC to s and τ, this inversion can push the guidance strength in the wrong direction for exactly the low- versus high-abstraction distinction the strategy is designed to make. The claim that LBSC automatically accommodates varying drawing skills is therefore not supported as written.
  2. [Section 3.2.4 and Appendix A.4] The weights wC, wL, and wT in Eq. (11) are never specified, and Lmax in Eq. (9) is also undefined. Consequently SC cannot be computed from the paper, the piecewise mapping to s and τ in Appendix A.4 cannot be reproduced, and the direction of SC's effect on guidance cannot be verified. In addition, no experiment compares SC to human judgments of sketch abstraction, so the central control mechanism is an unvalidated and non-reproducible heuristic.
  3. [Table 1] The caption states that the ablation rows were evaluated with different samples, so the rows OURS (w/o LBSC), OURS, OURS (w/o TSA), and OURS are not directly comparable to one another. For example, OURS (w/o LBSC) reports MSE 13.83 and SubC 98.8, whereas the first OURS row reports MSE 17.24 and SubC 97.4, and the w/o-TSA row shows a catastrophic drop on yet another set of samples. Without matched evaluation sets and significance tests, the quantitative claims that LBSC and TSA improve performance are not established.
  4. [Appendix B and Table 2] The user-study raw data and video examples are explicitly withheld, with the statement that the authors are 'temporarily unable to publicly share the specific video examples and their scoring details.' Table 2 reports only aggregate values with no significance tests or confidence intervals. Furthermore, the numbers in Table 2 appear to be percentages, but the protocol described in Appendix B collects 1–5 Likert scores and sums averaged scores; the relation between the two is unexplained. This makes the user-study evidence impossible to audit and insufficient to support the claim of significant superiority.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Appendix B, Table 1, Table 2] There are typographical and naming inconsistencies: Appendix B contains 'user stduy' and 'CONTRONET,' and ControlNet is attributed to Chen et al. (2023) in Table 1 but to Zhang et al. (2023) in Table 2 and the references.
  2. [Eq. (4) and Section 3.1] The symbol t is overloaded: in Eq. (4) it denotes an interpolation index for output frames, while in Section 3.1 and Eq. (7) it denotes the diffusion timestep. Please use distinct symbols.
  3. [Section 3.1] The first-frame generation step is described only as 'we recommend using A(·), representing (Mou et al., 2024),' but A(·) is elsewhere the sketch adapter, not a first-frame image generator; the actual procedure for producing x1,0 from a sketch is therefore unclear.
  4. [Figure 7 caption] The caption says 'we input a sketch sequence containing only two hand-drawn sketches ... three times to guide the generation of three video animations,' which is ambiguous about whether the same two sketches are reused or different sketch pairs are meant.
  5. [Related work, Section 2.2] The novelty claim of being 'first' should be sharpened against the cited works on sketch animation (Gal et al., 2024; Bandyopadhyay & Song, 2024), clarifying whether those methods generate video from sketches or animate static drawings and what exactly distinguishes VidSketch from them.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity found; the method is evaluated against external benchmarks and does not rest on self-citation or self-defined predictions.

full rationale

The claimed derivation chain is not circular. The core generation pipeline uses an external, pre-trained T2I-Adapter (Mou et al., 2024) as the conditioning backbone and fine-tunes only the TempSpatial Attention and Temporal Attention blocks; the Level-Based Sketch Control Strategy is a hand-authored heuristic (Eqs. 8-11 and Appendix A.4) that maps an internally defined abstraction score to an adapter scale and injection threshold, rather than a quantity fitted to the evaluation data and then reported as a prediction. No load-bearing self-citation appears: VidSketch's novelty claims are supported by external baselines (IP-Adapter, ControlNet, T2I-Adapter) and external benchmarks (VBench, PickScore, MSE, user study), and none of the cited prior works are by the present authors. The paper does contain genuine limitations—the weights wC, wL, wT are never specified, Eq. (8) appears directionally inconsistent with its stated semantics, the Appendix A.4 mapping is hand-picked, and Appendix B.3 withholds user-study details—but these are correctness/reproducibility defects, not instances where a 'prediction' is equivalent to its inputs by construction or where an argument reduces to a self-citation. Under the given circularity rubric, an honest non-finding is therefore appropriate.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The method rests on hand-designed heuristics for abstraction scoring whose weights are unreported, plus domain assumptions about interpolation, anchor-frame reliability, and fine-tuning data scale. No new physical or conceptual entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • wC, wL, wT (abstraction score weights) = not specified in paper
    Eq. 11 defines SC as a weighted sum, but the paper never reports numeric values for the three weights, making the score non-reproducible.
  • s and tau mapping thresholds and values = 0.55/0.4 if SC<=0.5; 0.65/0.5 if 0.5<SC<=1.0; 0.85/0.6 otherwise
    Appendix A.4 gives a piecewise mapping chosen by hand without justification or fitting procedure; these are ad hoc constants that control the method's behavior.
  • Lmax (max connected components) = unspecified
    Eq. 9 requires a maximum expected number of connected components to normalize AL into [0,1]; the paper does not state how Lmax is chosen.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Linear interpolation between user-sketch keyframes yields meaningful intermediate frames (Eq. 4).
    Used in Section 3.1 to build the full sketch sequence; not validated for complex motions.
  • ad hoc to paper Continuity, connectivity, and texture statistics capture sketch abstraction level (Eqs. 8-11).
    The three scores are constructed in Section 3.2 solely for this paper and have no external validation.
  • domain assumption Fine-tuning only attention modules on 8-12 videos per action category transfers to unseen actions and styles.
    Section 3.1 describes per-category fine-tuning; the tiny data scale makes the generalization claim fragile.
  • domain assumption The first frame generated by T2I-Adapter from the first sketch is a reliable fixed anchor for the whole video.
    Eq. 1 keeps the first frame noise-free; errors in that anchor propagate to all later frames.
  • standard math Standard computational geometry and image-processing results (Shoelace formula, GLCM, CCA, DFS) are correct and applicable.
    Invoked in Section 3.2 without proof; they are standard textbook results.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of VidSketch: Hand-drawn Sketch-Driven Video Generation with Diffusion Control." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/U2TQJJWD

@misc{pith2026250201101,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: VidSketch: Hand-drawn Sketch-Driven Video Generation with Diffusion Control},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/U2TQJJWD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.01101}
}
read the original abstract

With the advancement of generative artificial intelligence, previous studies have achieved the task of generating aesthetic images from hand-drawn sketches, fulfilling the public's needs for drawing. However, these methods are limited to static images and lack the ability to control video animation generation using hand-drawn sketches. To address this gap, we propose VidSketch, the first method capable of generating high-quality video animations directly from any number of hand-drawn sketches and simple text prompts, bridging the divide between ordinary users and professional artists. Specifically, our method introduces a Level-Based Sketch Control Strategy to automatically adjust the guidance strength of sketches during the generation process, accommodating users with varying drawing skills. Furthermore, a TempSpatial Attention mechanism is designed to enhance the spatiotemporal consistency of generated video animations, significantly improving the coherence across frames. You can find more detailed cases on our official website.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.01101 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Hand-drawn Sketch-Driven Video Generation. Our VidS￾ketch empowers users of all skill levels to effortlessly create stun￾ning, high-quality video animations using concise text prompt and hand-drawn sketch sequences of any level of abstraction. creation, we propose VidSketch, a novel approach that, un￾like traditional video editing methods, is based on Video Dif￾fusion Models (VDMs) (Shi et al., 2024; Qing et al., 20… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Video animations generated by our VidSketch. Our method generates video animation using any number of hand-drawn sketches (examples from top to bottom are guided by 1, 2, 4, and 5 sketches, respectively) and straightforward text prompt. This enables the creation of high-quality, spatiotemporal-consistent video animations, breaking barriers in the art profession. The figure showcases basic cases, and more high-qualit… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Pipeline of our VidSketch. During training, we use high-quality, small-scale video datasets categorized by type to train the TempSpatial Attention (TS-Attention) and Temporal Attention blocks, improving spatiotemporal consistency in video animations. During inference, users simply input a prompt and sketch sequences to generate tailored high-quality animations. Specifically, the first frame is generated using existi… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The effectiveness of our Level-Based Sketch Control Strategy. We perform a quantitative analysis of the continuity, connectivity, and texture detail of sketches to automatically eval￾uate the abstraction level of hand-drawn sketche sequences. As the horizontal axis mov…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The details of the proposed TempSpatial Attention mech￾anism. We extract the K/V tokens from the first frame, the second frame, and the (i − 1)-th frame, and compute the attention mecha￾nism using the query Q from the i-th frame, which enhances the spatiotemporal consi…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Qualitative comparison with IP-Adapter (Ye et al., 2023), ControlNet (Chen et al., 2023), T2I-Adapter (Mou et al., 2024). The figure clearly demonstrates that the video animations generated by VidSketch surpass other baselines in quality, achieving higher text alignmen…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Demonstration of video animation generation controlled by hand-drawn sketches with varying levels of abstraction. Specifically, we input a sketch sequence containing only two hand-drawn sketches with different abstraction levels (from top to bottom, decreasing in abstr…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Realistic style video generated by our method [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Pixel-art style video generated by our method. 15 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Fantasy style video generated by our method [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Magical style video generated by our method. 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Qualitative comparison with IP-Adapter, ControlNet, T2I-Adapter and our method [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Qualitative comparison with IP-Adapter, ControlNet, T2I-Adapter and our method. 17 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_15.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    FlipSketch: Flipping Static Drawings to Text-Guided Sketch Animations

    Bandyopadhyay, H. and Song, Y.-Z. Flipsketch: Flipping static drawings to text-guided sketch animations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.10818, 2024

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    Control-a-video: Controllable text-to-video generation with diffusion models

    Chen, W., Ji, Y., Wu, J., Wu, H., Xie, P., Li, J., Xia, X., Xiao, X., and Lin, L. Control-a-video: Controllable text-to-video generation with diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.13840, 2023

    arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Freecustom: Tuning-free customized image generation for multi-concept composition

    Ding, G., Zhao, C., Wang, W., Yang, Z., Liu, Z., Chen, H., and Shen, C. Freecustom: Tuning-free customized image generation for multi-concept composition. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.\ 9089--9098, 2024

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Ccedit: Creative and controllable video editing via diffusion models

    Feng, R., Weng, W., Wang, Y., Yuan, Y., Bao, J., Luo, C., Chen, Z., and Guo, B. Ccedit: Creative and controllable video editing via diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.\ 6712--6722, 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Breathing life into sketches using text-to-video priors

    Gal, R., Vinker, Y., Alaluf, Y., Bermano, A., Cohen-Or, D., Shamir, A., and Chechik, G. Breathing life into sketches using text-to-video priors. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.\ 4325--4336, 2024

    2024

  6. [6]

    Animatediff: Animate your personalized text-to-image diffusion models without specific tuning

    Guo, Y., Yang, C., Rao, A., Liang, Z., Wang, Y., Qiao, Y., Agrawala, M., Lin, D., and Dai, B. Animatediff: Animate your personalized text-to-image diffusion models without specific tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.04725, 2023

    arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    M., Shanmugam, K., and Dinstein, I

    Haralick, R. M., Shanmugam, K., and Dinstein, I. H. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics, 0 (6): 0 610--621, 1973

    work page 1973

  8. [8]

    Haralock, R. M. and Shapiro, L. G. Computer and robot vision. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., 1991

    work page 1991

Show all 33 references
  1. [9]

    o llein, L., Bo z i c , A., M \

    H \"o llein, L., Bo z i c , A., M \"u ller, N., Novotny, D., Tseng, H.-Y., Richardt, C., Zollh \"o fer, M., and Nie ner, M. Viewdiff: 3d-consistent image generation with text-to-image models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,...

    2024

  2. [10]

    Vbench: Comprehensive benchmark suite for video generative models

    Huang, Z., He, Y., Yu, J., Zhang, F., Si, C., Jiang, Y., Zhang, Y., Wu, T., Jin, Q., Chanpaisit, N., et al. Vbench: Comprehensive benchmark suite for video generative models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.\ 21807--21818, 2024

    2024

  3. [11]

    K., Sekhri, D., Sain, A., Chowdhury, P

    Koley, S., Bhunia, A. K., Sekhri, D., Sain, A., Chowdhury, P. N., Xiang, T., and Song, Y.-Z. It's all about your sketch: Democratising sketch control in diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.\ 7204--7214, 2024

    2024

  4. [12]

    Anyv2v: A plug-and-play framework for any video-to-video editing tasks

    Ku, M., Wei, C., Ren, W., Yang, H., and Chen, W. Anyv2v: A plug-and-play framework for any video-to-video editing tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.14468, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    and Lim, W

    Lee, Y. and Lim, W. Shoelace formula: Connecting the area of a polygon and the vector cross product. The Mathematics Teacher, 110 0 (8): 0 631--636, 2017

    2017

  6. [14]

    Vidtome: Video token merging for zero-shot video editing

    Li, X., Ma, C., Yang, X., and Yang, M.-H. Vidtome: Video token merging for zero-shot video editing. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.\ 7486--7495, 2024 a

    2024

  7. [15]

    Generative image dynamics

    Li, Z., Tucker, R., Snavely, N., and Holynski, A. Generative image dynamics. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.\ 24142--24153, 2024 b

    2024

  8. [16]

    Rich human feedback for text-to-image generation

    Liang, Y., He, J., Li, G., Li, P., Klimovskiy, A., Carolan, N., Sun, J., Pont-Tuset, J., Young, S., Yang, F., et al. Rich human feedback for text-to-image generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.\ 19401--19411, 2024

    2024

  9. [17]

    Video-p2p: Video editing with cross-attention control

    Liu, S., Zhang, Y., Li, W., Lin, Z., and Jia, J. Video-p2p: Video editing with cross-attention control. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.\ 8599--8608, 2024

    2024

  10. [18]

    Snap video: Scaled spatiotemporal transformers for text-to-video synthesis

    Menapace, W., Siarohin, A., Skorokhodov, I., Deyneka, E., Chen, T.-S., Kag, A., Fang, Y., Stoliar, A., Ricci, E., Ren, J., et al. Snap video: Scaled spatiotemporal transformers for text-to-video synthesis. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Patter...

    2024

  11. [19]

    T2i-adapter: Learning adapters to dig out more controllable ability for text-to-image diffusion models

    Mou, C., Wang, X., Xie, L., Wu, Y., Zhang, J., Qi, Z., and Shan, Y. T2i-adapter: Learning adapters to dig out more controllable ability for text-to-image diffusion models. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 38, pp.\ 4296--4304, 2024

    2024

  12. [20]

    Hierarchical spatio-temporal decoupling for text-to-video generation

    Qing, Z., Zhang, S., Wang, J., Wang, X., Wei, Y., Zhang, Y., Gao, C., and Sang, N. Hierarchical spatio-temporal decoupling for text-to-video generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.\ 6635--6645, 2024

    2024

  13. [21]

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models

    Rombach, R., Blattmann, A., Lorenz, D., Esser, P., and Ommer, B. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp.\ 10684--10695, 2022

    2022

  14. [22]

    Bivdiff: A training-free framework for general-purpose video synthesis via bridging image and video diffusion models

    Shi, F., Gu, J., Xu, H., Xu, S., Zhang, W., and Wang, L. Bivdiff: A training-free framework for general-purpose video synthesis via bridging image and video diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.\ 7393--7402, 2024

    2024

  15. [23]

    Suzuki, S. et al. Topological structural analysis of digitized binary images by border following. Computer vision, graphics, and image processing, 30 0 (1): 0 32--46, 1985

    1985

  16. [24]

    Sketch-guided text-to-image diffusion models

    Voynov, A., Aberman, K., and Cohen-Or, D. Sketch-guided text-to-image diffusion models. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2023 Conference Proceedings, pp.\ 1--11, 2023

    2023

  17. [25]

    Lamp: Learn a motion pattern for few-shot-based video generation

    Wu, R., Chen, L., Yang, T., Guo, C., Li, C., and Zhang, X. Lamp: Learn a motion pattern for few-shot-based video generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.10769, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Simda: Simple diffusion adapter for efficient video generation

    Xing, Z., Dai, Q., Hu, H., Wu, Z., and Jiang, Y.-G. Simda: Simple diffusion adapter for efficient video generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.\ 7827--7839, 2024

    2024

  19. [27]

    Motion-conditioned image animation for video editing

    Yan, W., Brown, A., Abbeel, P., Girdhar, R., and Azadi, S. Motion-conditioned image animation for video editing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.18827, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Ip-adapter: Text compatible image prompt adapter for text-to-image diffusion models

    Ye, H., Zhang, J., Liu, S., Han, X., and Yang, W. Ip-adapter: Text compatible image prompt adapter for text-to-image diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.06721, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Instructvideo: instructing video diffusion models with human feedback

    Yuan, H., Zhang, S., Wang, X., Wei, Y., Feng, T., Pan, Y., Zhang, Y., Liu, Z., Albanie, S., and Ni, D. Instructvideo: instructing video diffusion models with human feedback. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.\ 6463--6474, 2024

    2024

  22. [30]

    Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models

    Zhang, L., Rao, A., and Agrawala, M. Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp.\ 3836--3847, 2023

    2023

  23. [31]

    Sketch-guided scene image generation

    Zhang, T., Xie, X., Du, X., and Xie, H. Sketch-guided scene image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.06469, 2024 a

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Pia: Your personalized image animator via plug-and-play modules in text-to-image models

    Zhang, Y., Xing, Z., Zeng, Y., Fang, Y., and Chen, K. Pia: Your personalized image animator via plug-and-play modules in text-to-image models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.\ 7747--7756, 2024 b

    2024

  25. [33]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.