REVIEW 2 cited by
Which Model to Transfer? A Survey on Transferability Estimation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Transfer learning methods endeavor to leverage relevant knowledge from existing source pre-trained models or datasets to solve downstream target tasks. With the increase in the scale and quantity of available pre-trained models nowadays, it becomes critical to assess in advance whether they are suitable for a specific target task. Model transferability estimation is an emerging and growing area of interest, aiming to propose a metric to quantify this suitability without training them individually, which is computationally prohibitive. Despite extensive recent advances already devoted to this area, they have custom terminological definitions and experimental settings. In this survey, we present the first review of existing advances in this area and categorize them into two separate realms: source-free model transferability estimation and source-dependent model transferability estimation. Each category is systematically defined, accompanied by a comprehensive taxonomy. Besides, we address challenges and outline future research directions, intending to provide a comprehensive guide to aid researchers and practitioners.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
MetaRank: Task-Aware Metric Selection for Model Transferability Estimation
A meta-learner ranks MTE metrics for a target dataset from text descriptions, improving average rank over fixed metrics on 11 datasets.
-
Understanding Knowledge Transferability for Transfer Learning: A Survey
A survey that classifies transferability metrics by knowledge modality (dataset vs. model) and granularity (task vs. instance), with a theoretical primer and applications to eight learning paradigms.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.