Pith. sign in

REVIEW

An Empirical Study of Uncertainty in Polygon Annotation and the Impact of Quality Assurance

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.02707 v1 pith:U4ZLA4XP submitted 2023-11-05 cs.CV

An Empirical Study of Uncertainty in Polygon Annotation and the Impact of Quality Assurance

classification cs.CV
keywords annotationpolygonqualityannotationsassurancecommonobjectsuncertainty
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Polygons are a common annotation format used for quickly annotating objects in instance segmentation tasks. However, many real-world annotation projects request near pixel-perfect labels. While strict pixel guidelines may appear to be the solution to a successful project, practitioners often fail to assess the feasibility of the work requested, and overlook common factors that may challenge the notion of quality. This paper aims to examine and quantify the inherent uncertainty for polygon annotations and the role that quality assurance plays in minimizing its effect. To this end, we conduct an analysis on multi-rater polygon annotations for several objects from the MS-COCO dataset. The results demonstrate that the reliability of a polygon annotation is dependent on a reviewing procedure, as well as the scene and shape complexity.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.