Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 48 references

Transparent boundary conditions for the spatially discrete Schr\"odinger equation: Reflectionless quantum transport in 1D lattices

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper derives exact transparent boundary conditions for the semi-discrete Schrödinger equation, so truncated lattice simulations can reproduce infinite-lattice transport with zero spurious reflection.

desk verdict The main TBC formula is correct but already known, and the discretization section has a scaling error that makes the numerical claim of zero reflection unverified. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.05338 v1 pith:U6JSNWSS submitted 2026-08-05 math-ph cs.NAmath.MPmath.NAquant-ph

Mashrab E. Akramov , Jambul R. Yusupov , Matthias Ehrhardt , Davron U. Matrasulov This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phcs.NAmath.MPmath.NAquant-ph MSC 35Q4165M0681Q05
keywords transparentboundaryconditionsdiscreteSchrödingerequationDirichlet-to-NeumannmaplatticequantumtransportBesselconvolutionkernelCrank-Nicolsonschemereflectionlesswavepacketcontinuumlimit
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper constructs exact transparent boundary conditions for the time-continuous, spatially discrete Schrödinger equation on a one-dimensional lattice, so that a computation restricted to finitely many lattice sites reproduces the infinite-lattice solution until the wave exits. The boundary condition is a convolution of the boundary value with a Bessel-function kernel, obtained by Laplace transforming the exterior problem and selecting the decaying lattice mode. The authors show that in the continuum limit this discrete boundary condition reduces to the known fractional-integral transparent boundary condition for the continuous Schrödinger equation, and they give a trapezoidal-rule discretization for practical use. If the claim is right, simulations of quantum transport in conducting polymers, molecular chains, and other discrete lattices can be truncated without the artificial reflections that plague naive absorbing boundaries.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Laplace-domain Dirichlet-to-Neumann map, derived from the characteristic equation $\xi^2-2(1-ih^2s)\xi+1=0$ whose roots come in reciprocal pairs; choosing the root inside the unit circle encodes outgoing waves. The Bessel Laplace pair $L\{J_1(at)/t\}(s)=(-s+\sqrt{s^2+a^2})/a$ converts the map into the time-domain convolution in Eq. (15). The trapezoidal rule and the limiting kernel value $K(0)=1/(2h^2)$ make the history term computable; this mechanism is what carries the reflectionless claim.

What would settle it

Run the same Gaussian wave-packet experiment on the truncated lattice and on a much larger reference lattice, and compute the $\ell^2$ difference of the two solutions restricted to $0\le j\le J$ over time (or the late-time value of the truncated norm $M(t)$); a difference that fails to converge to zero, or a rise in $M(t)$ after the packet has left, would show the fully discrete scheme reflects.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's terms, the central discovery is that the exact Dirichlet-to-Neumann map for the semi-discrete lattice equation is available in closed form. Writing the Laplace-transformed exterior solution as $\hat\Phi_j(s)=\xi_+(s)^{j-J}$, with $\xi_+(s)=1-ih^2s+ih\sqrt{2is+h^2s^2}$ selected by the decay condition $|\xi_+|\le 1$, the boundary condition becomes a convolution in time, $\frac{1}{h}(\Psi_J-\Psi_{J-1})(t)=-\frac{1}{h}\Psi_J(t)+\frac{i}{h}\int_0^t e^{-i(t-\tau)/h^2}\frac{1}{t-\tau}J_1\!\left((t-\tau)/h^2\right)\Psi_J(\tau)d\tau$. Because the restriction of the infinite-lattice solution satisfies this relation exactly, the boundary is transparent in the time-continuous problem; the paper further verifies consistency with the continuous TBC as $h\to 0$ and demonstrates a trapezoidal-rule time discretization implemented with a Crank-Nicolson interior solver.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that exact transparency proved for the time-continuous boundary condition survives the trapezoidal-rule discretization and the Crank-Nicolson interior update, so that the fully discrete code is still reflectionless.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A simulation on $0\le j\le J$ with these boundary conditions reproduces the infinite-lattice dynamics for compactly supported initial data, so small computational domains can stand in for unbounded lattices.
  • The same boundary map should work for any right-moving initial data once the left boundary is handled symmetrically, allowing reflectionless transport studies in quasi-1D quantum wires and polymer chains.
  • In the continuum limit the discrete TBC reduces to the standard fractional-derivative TBC for the continuous Schrödinger equation, giving a consistency bridge between lattice and continuum simulations.
  • The trapezoidal-rule discretization gives an explicit update for the boundary value that can be combined with implicit interior solvers such as Crank-Nicolson without visible backscattering in the paper's wave-packet tests.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct testable extension would compare the truncated solution against a reference solution on a much larger lattice and report the reflected mass as a function of time; the paper's monotone norm decay is suggestive but not a quantitative reflection measurement.
  • If exactness survives the time discretization only approximately, the residual reflection likely scales with the time step $\Delta t$; measuring it would turn the boundary condition into a controlled approximation with an error rate.
  • The same Laplace-plus-Bessel machinery should transfer to other discrete dispersive equations with quadratic dispersion relations, since only the characteristic polynomial changes; this is an editorial extrapolation, not a claim in the paper.
  • A two-sided version of the boundary map would be needed to study wave packets that reach both ends, since the numerical example uses a homogeneous Dirichlet condition on the left and tests only right-moving transport.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper derives transparent boundary conditions (TBCs) for the time-continuous, spatially discrete Schr\"odinger equation on a 1D lattice. The authors Laplace-transform the exterior problem, select the decaying characteristic root, and obtain a convolution-type condition with a Bessel kernel, Eq. (15). They then study the continuum limit and propose a trapezoidal-rule time discretization of the convolution term. Numerical experiments with a Crank-Nicolson interior solver and a Gaussian initial packet are presented to support the claim that the boundary is reflectionless.

Significance. If fully established, the paper would provide a useful construction: an exact, parameter-free Dirichlet-to-Neumann map for the semi-discrete Schr\"odinger equation, with a Bessel-kernel convolution that reduces formally to the known continuous TBC in the limit h->0. The Laplace-domain derivation of Eq. (15) is essentially sound, and the paper contains no fitted constants or circular reduction to prior results. However, the main headline claim concerns the fully discrete implementation, and that part currently contains algebraic inconsistencies and lacks quantitative verification. The semi-discrete result is valuable, but the manuscript as written does not justify the stronger statement that the implemented scheme 'eliminates spurious backscattering entirely'.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section IID, Eqs. (28)-(32)] Equations (28)-(31) and (32) are mutually inconsistent. Multiplying the exact TBC (15) by h gives (Psi_J - Psi_{J-1}) = -Psi_J + i \int_0^t K(t-tau)Psi_J(tau) dtau, hence 2Psi_J - Psi_{J-1} = i \int_0^t K(t-tau)Psi_J(tau) dtau with no factor 1/h. Equation (28), however, defines I(t) = (i/h)\int K(t-tau)Psi_J(tau)dtau, and Eqs. (30)-(31) inherit this spurious 1/h. Equation (32) corresponds instead to the no-1/h version: with K(0)=1/(2h^2), the coefficient of Psi^n_J on the right-hand side of (31) would need to be i\Delta t/(4h^3) to yield the printed denominator, whereas the denominator in (32) is 2 - i\Delta t/(4h^2). An implementer therefore cannot determine from the text which convolution scaling is actually used in the numerical code.
  2. [Section III, Eq. (32) and Crank-Nicolson update] The temporal coupling between the boundary update and the interior Crank-Nicolson solve is not specified and appears inconsistent. Equation (32) is written at time level n and expresses Psi^n_J in terms of Psi^n_{J-1} and past values, but the text states that the right boundary value Psi^{n+1}_J is updated explicitly using Eq. (32). If Eq. (32) is evaluated at level n+1, it requires Psi^{n+1}_{J-1}, which is not available until the tridiagonal interior solve is completed; if it is evaluated at level n, it does not update the boundary for the new time level. No stability or reflection analysis for this fully discrete coupling is provided, so the exact transparency of the semi-discrete TBC is not established for the implemented scheme.
  3. [Section IIC, Eqs. (18)-(22)] The derivation of the continuum limit is formal rather than rigorous, despite the abstract's claim of a rigorous demonstration. Passing from (18) to (19) replaces the upper limit t/h^2 by infinity, then substitutes the large-argument asymptotic (21) and discards the rapidly oscillating term e^{-2iv/h^2} without uniform error estimates in v and t. The final formula (26) is plausible and consistent with (2), but the limit step needs either rigorous estimates or a more cautious statement of the result.
  4. [Section III, numerical verification] The numerical evidence does not quantitatively establish 'entirely reflectionless' transport. Figure 2 is a visual inspection of snapshots, and the monotone decay of the discrete norm in Figure 3 is necessary but not sufficient to exclude a small reflected component. The paper should compare the truncated-domain solution against a reference solution on a sufficiently large (or infinite) lattice and report a quantitative reflected-norm measurement, e.g., R(t) = ||Psi_computed - Psi_reference||_2 or the reflected probability flux. Convergence in h and \Delta t should also be reported for this quantity.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introduction and references] The statement that discrete lattice equations have 'largely remained outside the scope' of exact TBC formulations is too strong in view of the cited works [5,7-9], which already construct discrete transparent boundary conditions for Schr\"odinger-type equations; the authors should clarify what is new relative to those works.
  2. [Section IIB, Eq. (11)] The phrase 'inspired by the exact power-form solution derived in [31]' is unnecessary: the ansatz \hat\Phi_j = \xi^{j-J} is the standard characteristic solution to a constant-coefficient difference equation. The citation to [31] does not support the derivation and could be removed or replaced by a direct statement.
  3. [Figure 1] The axis label 'Re(9')' appears garbled and should read Re(\xi) (and similarly for Im(\xi)).
  4. [Section III, Eq. (35)] There is a typo in 'with a width of \sigma=1, a wave number of k_0=5, and Aa normalization constant'; it should read 'and A a normalization constant'.
  5. [Section III] The word 'numericall' in 'we numericall solve' is a typo and should read 'numerically'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the TBC derivation is self-contained and the [31] self-citation is motivational, not load-bearing; the main weaknesses are correctness and verification gaps, not circular reasoning.

full rationale

The central derivation does not reduce to its inputs. The right exterior problem (6) is Laplace-transformed to (9), and the characteristic equation (10) is solved by the elementary power-form ansatz; the decaying root is selected by |ξ_+(s)| ≤ 1 via Vieta and the figure, and the inverse Laplace transform uses the standard Bessel pair (14) and the convolution rule. The resulting TBC (15) is an exact Dirichlet-to-Neumann map by construction: it equates the interior discrete derivative with the exterior solution's derivative, so transparency is a mathematical consequence rather than a fitted or cited result. No parameters are fitted to data, and no prediction is derived from a subset of the same data. The only self-citation is Ref. [31], whose 'exact solution' is invoked as inspiration for the power-form ansatz; the paper itself verifies the characteristic equation and root selection, so the citation is not load-bearing. The numerical section tests the very TBC it implements, which is self-referential as a verification strategy and, without an infinite-lattice reference solution or a reflected-norm measurement, does not quantitatively establish 'entirely reflectionless' behavior for the fully discrete scheme; however, this is a verification and correctness weakness, not a circular derivation. The algebraic inconsistency in the discretized TBC scaling (Eqs. (28)-(32) mix an extra 1/h into the convolution) and the explicit boundary update lagging the Crank-Nicolson solve are correctness/stability issues, not circularity. These concerns should be weighed under correctness risk, not as a circularity finding.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The derivation rests on standard mathematics plus domain assumptions about zero exterior potential, compact support of initial data, and an outgoing-wave root selection. No free parameters are fitted to data, and no new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The exterior solution decays as j→∞; the root ξ_+(s) with |ξ_+(s)|≤1 is admissible for all Re(s)>0.
    Used to select the plus sign in Eq (11); supported only by the numerical trajectories in Fig 1, not by an analytic argument.
  • domain assumption Initial data are compactly supported in the computational domain and Ψ_J(0)=0.
    Stated in Section IIA; used in Section IIC to justify cancellation of the Riemann-Liouville and Caputo fractional derivatives.
  • domain assumption The exterior potential is zero, so the free discrete Schrödinger equation governs the exterior problems.
    The exterior problems (6) assume V=0; the TBC is only derived for the free lattice equation.
  • standard math Standard Laplace transform pairs, Bessel function asymptotics (Abramowitz-Stegun 9.2.1, 9.1.7), and fractional calculus identities are used.
    Invoked in Sections IIB and IIC for the inverse Laplace transform and the continuum limit.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Transparent boundary conditions for the spatially discrete Schr\"odinger equation: Reflectionless quantum transport in 1D lattices." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/U6JSNWSS

@misc{pith2026260805338,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Transparent boundary conditions for the spatially discrete Schr\"odinger equation: Reflectionless quantum transport in 1D lattices},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/U6JSNWSS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.05338}
}
read the original abstract

We construct exact transparent boundary conditions (TBCs) for a time-continuous, spatially discrete Schr\"odinger equation that models a one-dimensional quantum lattice. Using a recently developed exact solution for the discrete system, we derive the Dirichlet-to-Neumann maps analytically via Laplace transforms. This yields a convolution-type boundary condition governed by Bessel functions. We rigorously demonstrate the consistency of this discrete formulation with its continuous counterpart in the continuum limit. Additionally, we present an efficient time-discretization scheme based on the trapezoidal rule for practical implementation. Numerical experiments using a Crank-Nicolson solver verify that our proposed TBCs eliminate spurious backscattering entirely and preserve reflectionless propagation of a Gaussian wave packet exiting the computational domain

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.05338 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Trajectories of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Snapshots of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Time evolution of the discrete norm in Eq. (36). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [34]

    Akramov, J.R

    M.E. Akramov, J.R. Yusupov, M. Ehrhardt, H. Susanto, D.U. Matrasulov, Transparent PT-symmetric nonlinear networks, Physica Scripta100(4)045209 (2025)

    work page 2025

  2. [1]

    Split the original problem into coupled equations: interior and exterior problems

    work page

  3. [2]

    Apply a Laplace transformation in timet

    work page

  4. [3]

    Solve the ordinary differential equations inx

    work page

  5. [4]

    outgoing

    Allow only “outgoing” waves by selecting the decaying solution asx→ ±∞

    work page

  6. [5]

    Match the Dirichlet and Neumann values atx= 0,x=L

    work page

  7. [6]

    interior

    Apply the inverse Laplace transformation. One can apply this procedure to derive the right TBC atx=Lusing the following two basic assumptions: The initial data, denoted by Ψ I , is compactly supported in the computational domain, 0< x < L. The given external potential is constant outside this finite domain, i.e.V(x, t) = 0 forx⩽0,V(x, t) =V L forx⩾L, one ...

    work page

  8. [7]

    Engquist, A

    B. Engquist, A. Majda, Absorbing boundary conditions for the numerical simulation of waves, Math. Comput.31(139), 629 (1977)

    work page 1977

Show all 48 references
  1. [8]

    Engquist, A

    B. Engquist, A. Majda, Radiation boundary conditions for acoustic and elastic wave calculations, Commun. Pure Appl. Math.32(3), 313 (1979)

    1979

  2. [9]

    Halpern, Artificial boundary conditions for incompletely parabolic perturbations of hyperbolic systems, SIAM J

    L. Halpern, Artificial boundary conditions for incompletely parabolic perturbations of hyperbolic systems, SIAM J. Math. Anal.22, 1256 (1991). 9

    1991

  3. [10]

    Sofronov, Conditions for complete transparency on the sphere for the three–dimensional wave equation, Russ

    I.L. Sofronov, Conditions for complete transparency on the sphere for the three–dimensional wave equation, Russ. Acad. Sci. Dokl. Math.46, 397 (1993)

    1993

  4. [11]

    Schmidt, D

    F. Schmidt, D. Yevick, Discrete transparent boundary conditions for Schr¨ odinger-type equations, J. Comput. Phys.134(1), 96 (1997)

    1997

  5. [12]

    Arnold, Numerically absorbing boundary conditions for quantum evolution equations, VLSI Design6(1-4), 313 (1998)

    A. Arnold, Numerically absorbing boundary conditions for quantum evolution equations, VLSI Design6(1-4), 313 (1998)

    1998

  6. [13]

    Ehrhardt, Discrete transparent boundary conditions for general Schr¨ odinger-type equations, VLSI Design9(4), 325 (1999)

    M. Ehrhardt, Discrete transparent boundary conditions for general Schr¨ odinger-type equations, VLSI Design9(4), 325 (1999)

    1999

  7. [14]

    Ehrhardt, A

    M. Ehrhardt, A. Arnold, Discrete transparent boundary conditions for the Schr¨ odinger equation, Riv. di Math. Univ. di Parma,6(4), 57 (2001)

    2001

  8. [15]

    Arnold, M

    A. Arnold, M. Ehrhardt, I. Sofronov, Discrete transparent boundary conditions for the Schr¨ odinger equation: Fast calcu- lation, approximation, and stability, Commun. Math. Sci.,1(3), 501 (2003)

    2003

  9. [16]

    Antoine, A

    X. Antoine, A. Arnold, C. Besse, M. Ehrhardt, A. Sch¨ adle, A review of transparent and artificial boundary conditions techniques for linear and nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations, Commun. Comput. Phys.4(4), 729 (2008)

    2008

  10. [17]

    Antoine, Ch

    X. Antoine, Ch. Besse, S. Descombes, Artificial boundary conditions for one-dimensional cubic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations, SIAM J. Numer. Anal.43, 2272 (2006)

    2006

  11. [18]

    Antoine, C

    X. Antoine, C. Besse, P. Klein, Absorbing boundary conditions for the one-dimensional Schr¨ odinger equation with an exterior repulsive potential, J. Comp. Phys.228, 312 (2009)

    2009

  12. [19]

    Antoine, C

    X. Antoine, C. Besse, M. Ehrhardt, P. Klein, Modeling boundary conditions for solving stationary Schr¨ odinger equations, Preprint BUW-AMNA-OPAP 10/04, University of Wuppertal, February 2010

    2010

  13. [20]

    Ehrhardt, C

    M. Ehrhardt, C. Zheng, Absorbing boundary conditions for variable potential Schr¨ odinger equations via Titchmarsh-Weyl theory, Commun. Comput. Phys.38(3)711 (2025)

    2025

  14. [21]

    Klein, X

    P. Klein, X. Antoine, C. Besse, M. Ehrhardt, Absorbing boundary conditions for solving stationary Schr¨ odinger equations, Progress in Industrial Mathematics at ECMI 2010. Mathematics in Industry, vol 17. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011

    2010

  15. [22]

    Klein, X

    P. Klein, X. Antoine, C. Besse, M. Ehrhardt, Absorbing boundary conditions for solving N-dimensional stationary Schr¨ odinger equations with unbounded potentials and nonlinearities, Commun. Comput. Phys.10(5)1280 (2011)

    2011

  16. [23]

    P. Klein, Construction et analyse de conditions aux limites artificielles pour des ´ equations de Schr¨ odinger avec potentiels et non lin´ earit´ es, Doctoral dissertation, Universit´ e Henri Poincar´ e-Nancy 1, 2010

    2010

  17. [24]

    Shibata, Absorbing boundary conditions for the finite-difference time-domain calculation of the one-dimensional Schr¨ odinger equation, Phys

    T. Shibata, Absorbing boundary conditions for the finite-difference time-domain calculation of the one-dimensional Schr¨ odinger equation, Phys. Rev. B43(8), 6760 (1991)

    1991

  18. [25]

    Kuska, Absorbing boundary conditions for the Schr¨ odinger equation on finite intervals, Phys

    J.-P. Kuska, Absorbing boundary conditions for the Schr¨ odinger equation on finite intervals, Phys. Rev. B46(8), 5000 (1992)

    1992

  19. [26]

    Yusupov, K.K

    J.R. Yusupov, K.K. Sabirov, M. Ehrhardt, D.U. Matrasulov, Transparent quantum graphs, Physics Letters A383(20) 2382 (2019)

    2019

  20. [27]

    Yusupov, K.K

    J.R. Yusupov, K.K. Sabirov, M. Ehrhardt, D.U. Matrasulov, Transparent nonlinear networks, Phys. Rev. E100(3)032204 (2019)

    2019

  21. [28]

    Aripov, K.K

    M.M. Aripov, K.K. Sabirov, J.R. Yusupov, Transparent vertex boundary conditions for quantum graphs: Simplified approach, Nanosystems: Phys. Chem. Math.10(5)505 (2019)

    2019

  22. [29]

    Yusupov, K.K

    J.R. Yusupov, K.K. Sabirov, Q.U. Asadov, M. Ehrhardt, D.U. Matrasulov, Dirac particles in transparent quantum graphs: Tunable transport of relativistic quasiparticles in branched structures, Phys. Rev. E101(6)062208 (2020)

    2020

  23. [30]

    Sabirov, J.R

    K.K. Sabirov, J.R. Yusupov, M.M. Aripov, M. Ehrhardt, D.U. Matrasulov, Reflectionless propagation of Manakov solitons on a line: A model based on the concept of transparent boundary conditions, Phys. Rev. E103043305 (2021)

    2021

  24. [31]

    Sabirov, J.R

    K.K. Sabirov, J.R. Yusupov, M. Ehrhardt, D.U. Matrasulov, Transparent boundary conditions for the sine-Gordon equa- tion: Modeling the reflectionless propagation of kink solitons on a line, Phys. Lett. A423127822 (2022)

    2022

  25. [32]

    Yusupov, K.S

    J.R. Yusupov, K.S. Matyokubov, M. Ehrhardt, D.U. Matrasulov, Manakov system on metric graphs: Modeling the reflec- tionless propagation of vector solitons in networks, Phys. Lett. A479128928 (2023)

    2023

  26. [33]

    Akramov, J.R

    M.E. Akramov, J.R. Yusupov, M. Ehrhardt, H. Susanto, D.U. Matrasulov, Transparent boundary conditions for the nonlocal nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation: A model for reflectionless propagation of PT-symmetric solitons. Phys. Lett. A 459128611 (2023)

    2023

  27. [35]

    Yusupov, M

    J.R. Yusupov, M. Ehrhardt, K.S. Matyokubov, D.U. Matrasulov, Driven transparent quantum graphs, Physica Scripta 100(7)075224 (2025)

    2025

  28. [36]

    Derkach, C

    V.A. Derkach, C. Trunk, D.U. Matrasulov, J.R. Yusupov, Transparent boundary conditions for the stationary Schr¨ odinger equation via Weyl–Titchmarsh theory, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.58(34)345201 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    Akramov, C

    M. Akramov, C. Trunk, J. Yusupov, D. Matrasulov, Discrete Schr¨ odinger equation on graphs: an effective model for branched quantum lattice, Europhys. Lett.147, 62001 (2024)

    2024

  30. [38]

    Alonso-Mallo, N

    I. Alonso-Mallo, N. Reguera, Weak ill-posedness of spatial discretizations of absorbing boundary conditions for Schr¨ odinger- type equations, SIAM J. Numer. Anal.40134 (2006)

    2006

  31. [39]

    Lubich, A

    C. Lubich, A. Sch¨ adle, Fast convolution for nonreflecting boundary conditions, SIAM J. Sci. Comput.24161 (2002)

    2002

  32. [40]

    J. Hu, C. Zheng, Fast and stable evaluation of the exact absorbing boundary condition for the semi-discrete linear Schr¨ odinger equation in unbounded domains, J. Comput. Appl. Math.326116 (2017)

    2017

  33. [41]

    Ch. Wu, S.V. Malinin, S. Tretiak, V.Y. Chernyak, J. Chem. Phys.129(2008) 174111

    2008

  34. [42]

    Ch. Wu, S.V. Malinin, S. Tretiak, V.Y. Chernyak, J. Chem. Phys.129(2008) 174113

    2008

  35. [43]

    H. Li, S.V. Malinin, S. Tretiak, V.Y. Chernyak, J. Chem. Phys.132(2010) 124103. 10

    2010

  36. [44]

    Yusupov, Kh.Sh

    J.R. Yusupov, Kh.Sh. Matyokubov, K.K. Sabirov, D.U. Matrasulov, Exciton dynamics in branched conducting polymers: Quantum graphs based approach, Chem. Phys.537(2020): 110861

    2020

  37. [45]

    Hegger, R

    R. Hegger, R. Binder, I. Burghardt, First-principles quantum and quantum-classical simulations of exciton diffusion in semiconducting polymer chains at finite temperature, J. Chem. Theor. Comput.16(9)(2020) 5441

    2020

  38. [46]

    Abramowitz, A

    M. Abramowitz, A. Stegun (eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Dover, New York, 1965

    1965

  39. [47]

    Podlubny, Fractional Differential Equations, New York: Academic Press, 1999

    I. Podlubny, Fractional Differential Equations, New York: Academic Press, 1999

    1999

  40. [48]

    Huseynov, A

    I.T. Huseynov, A. Ahmadova, N.I. Mahmudov, Fractional Leibniz integral rules for Riemann-Liouville and Caputo frac- tional derivatives and their applications, arXiv:2012.11360, 2020

    2012 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.