Cavity engineering of solid-state materials without external driving

Angel Rubio; Dongbin Shin; Hannes H\"ubener; I-Te Lu; Mark Kamper Svendsen; Michael Ruggenthaler; Simone Latini

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Cavity engineering of solid-state materials without external driving

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Cavity vacuum photons can rewrite a solid's ground state.

desk verdict A useful but promotional review whose central LWA mode-volume claim is asserted, not proven. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.03172 v1 pith:U6L7H5BF submitted 2025-02-05 cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.opticsquant-ph

I-Te Lu , Dongbin Shin , Mark Kamper Svendsen , Simone Latini , Hannes Hübener , Michael Ruggenthaler , Angel Rubio This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.opticsquant-ph PACS 42.50.Pq71.36.+c71.10.-w

keywords cavitymaterialsengineeringquantumvacuumfluctuationsdarkstronglight-mattercouplingquantum-electrodynamicaldensity-functionaltheorylong-wavelengthapproximationequilibriumgroundstatespolaritons

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review stakes out a field: cavity materials engineering. It claims that placing a solid inside an optical cavity—even a dark, unpumped one—changes the material's equilibrium ground state because the confined quantum vacuum fluctuations of the photon field couple to electrons and phonons. If true, cavity geometry and materials become a control parameter for equilibrium phases, and room-temperature operation is plausible because the mechanism is renormalization, not transient laser excitation. The review establishes the theoretical backbone (Pauli-Fierz Hamiltonian, long-wavelength approximation, QEDFT, macroscopic QED) and surveys experimental evidence including the quantum Hall effect, the 1T-TaS2 metal-insulator transition, and YBCO ferromagnetism, plus theoretical targets in ferroelectricity, superconductivity, correlations, and topology.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Pauli-Fierz Hamiltonian, the low-energy Hamiltonian for coupled electrons, nuclei, and quantized transverse photon fields. For extended planar cavities, the long-wavelength approximation (LWA) is the step that matters: by keeping the multimode structure and averaging over modes, it replaces the infinite quantization volume with a finite effective mode volume $V_{\mathrm{eff}}\sim L_c^3 F$, so the light-matter coupling stays nonzero in the thermodynamic limit. On top of that, quantum-electrodynamical density-functional theory (QEDFT) provides a practical first-principles scheme, and macroscopic quantum electrodynamics (MQED) connects the effective parameters to realistic, lossy cavities.

What would settle it

Measure the cavity-induced shift of the metal-insulator transition temperature in 1T-TaS2 while varying the in-plane sample area at fixed cavity length and finesse. The LWA predicts the shift survives until the sample exceeds a length scale set by $(L_c^3 F)^{1/3}$, while the dipole approximation predicts the shift falls to zero with increasing area; the measurement distinguishes the two.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the electromagnetic vacuum inside a cavity is not a passive background. Because the cavity confines photon modes, the zero-point field fluctuations couple strongly to electronic and vibrational degrees of freedom of an embedded solid and renormalize its ground state even with no external driving. The review argues this has already been observed—integer quantum Hall quantization weakens, fractional Hall states stabilize, 1T-TaS2's metal-insulator transition shifts, and YBCO's ferromagnetism is enhanced—and that first-principles theory predicts analogous equilibrium control over ferroelectricity, superconductivity, correlated magnetism, and topological band structure. The conceptual move is to treat photons as a designable constituent of the solid rather than as a probe or a drive.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that, for an extended flat cavity, light-matter coupling is controlled by a finite effective mode volume set by cavity length and finesse rather than by the whole quantization volume; if that premise fails, the predicted couplings vanish as the sample grows and most of the reviewed proposals collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Cavity geometry, finesse, and mirror materials become engineering parameters for equilibrium material phases, with no external laser required.
Equilibrium renormalization allows room-temperature modification, since the mechanism does not rely on creating and sustaining a transient excited state.
Specific predicted targets acquire concrete experimental routes: para-to-ferroelectric transitions in SrTiO3, enhanced superconductivity in MgB2, and cavity-stabilized spin liquids and topological Chern insulators.
The effective mode volume $V_{\mathrm{eff}}\sim L_c^3 F$ predicts that extended samples remain strongly coupled up to a finite size, so collective coupling experiments should be designed with that length scale in mind.
Ground-state properties can be tuned by remote gating through the cavity field, as proposed for moiré bilayers, meaning cavity parameters can act as nonlocal control knobs.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Beyond the paper: if the effective mode volume picture holds, cavity parameters could be added to materials phase diagrams alongside pressure, strain, and twist angle, enabling systematic searches over existing material databases for cavity-stabilized phases.
A quantitative scaling test the paper leaves implicit: material modifications should scale with the sample size divided by $(L_c^3 F)^{1/3}$; plotting reported shifts against that ratio would separate LWA physics from artifacts.
The review's conflicting ferroelectric predictions (stabilization vs suppression) suggest the bare-versus-physical mass choice is unresolved; settling it could change predicted phase boundaries, not merely numerical details.
Extending the same formalism to phonon-polariton cavities in the terahertz range could connect the room-temperature polaritonic-chemistry results to solid-state ground-state engineering—a bridge the review leaves implicit.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Dear Colleague,

Quick take: this is a review, not a new research contribution. It gives a broad, useful map of cavity materials engineering — the theory tools (Pauli–Fierz, MQED, LWA, QEDFT), the three main experimental pillars (QHE, 1T-TaS2, YBCO), and a long list of theoretical proposals. If you want an entry point into this literature, it serves well. But the paper's central quantitative claim for planar cavities is asserted rather than demonstrated, and the review is more promotional than critical in places.

What it does well: the organization is clear, the figures are informative, and it takes care to distinguish cavity-driven equilibrium effects from Floquet/laser-driven transients. It also flags contradictions — e.g., some calculations predict cavity-induced ferroelectricity, others suppression — and it admits that the mechanisms behind the QHE, 1T-TaS2, and YBCO experiments are not settled. That is honest.

The main soft spot is Eq. (40), the effective mode volume V_eff ~ L_c^3 F. The claim that the coupling stays finite regardless of the cavity's lateral size is exactly the kind of thing a review should either prove or mark as controversial. The paper just cites Ref. [105] and calls the result 'remarkable.' The stress-test note is right: finesse is a dimensionless spectral parameter, not a geometric length, and a direct mode-sum for a planar cavity gives a finite coupling via area cancellation without invoking F. If the F-based regularization is wrong, the abstract's equilibrium ground-state claim for planar cavities lacks theoretical support. At minimum, the review should present the derivation or flag it as an open question.

The other soft spot is promotional tone. Section 5.1 says 'some of us initiated and pioneered' the field — that is fine as a historical note, but combined with heavy self-citation it gives the review a whiff of a position paper. The novelty is low because it is a review, but that is expected.

Who benefits: graduate students and researchers new to the area, and experimentalists wanting to know what theory claims. It is a solid starting point, not a critical appraisal. The unresolved theoretical contradictions are collected but not adjudicated.

I would send this to peer review — it is a useful comprehensive review from leading groups — but I would make the referees insist on either a real derivation or a clear caveat for the LWA coupling strength, and a cut of the self-promotional lines.

Best, [You]

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. This review article surveys the emerging field of "cavity materials engineering," in which solid-state materials are coupled to quantized electromagnetic modes in the absence of external driving, with the aim of modifying their equilibrium ground-state properties via vacuum (and thermal) field fluctuations. The paper introduces the Pauli-Fierz Hamiltonian, macroscopic QED, the long-wavelength approximation, and QEDFT as the theoretical toolset; reviews three experimental pillars (cavity-modified quantum Hall effect, 1T-TaS2 metal-to-insulator transition, YBCO ferromagnetism/superconductivity); and compiles theoretical predictions for ferroelectricity, superconductivity, strongly correlated phases, and topology. It concludes with a discussion of challenges and an outlook.

Significance. If the central claim holds—that cavity vacuum fluctuations can switch or tune equilibrium phases of extended solids at room temperature—this would establish a new materials-engineering axis distinct from laser-driven Floquet engineering. The review's main value is its structured synthesis: it makes the theoretical frameworks accessible, collects the early experimental evidence, and is candid about several unresolved mechanisms (e.g., the QHE mechanism, the 1T-TaS2 GHz/THz discrepancy, the indirect nature of the YBCO coupling). The paper also highlights open-source implementations (OCTOPUS) and ab initio-based predictions (e.g., MgB2), which strengthens its usefulness as a reference. However, the review's central theoretical support for extended planar cavities rests on a single cited mode-volume regularization (Eq. (40)) that is not demonstrated, and the abstract overstates the room-temperature experimental evidence.

major comments (3)

[Sec. 2.3, Eq. (40)] The claim that the effective mode volume V_eff ~ L_c^3 F keeps the light-matter coupling finite for arbitrarily extended planar Fabry-Pérot cavities is load-bearing for the review's theoretical framework, but the derivation is not provided; only Ref. [105] is cited. Because the finesse F is a spectral linewidth parameter rather than a geometric transverse dimension, it is not evident that it regularizes the transverse mode sum, and a direct mode-counting argument for a planar cavity with lateral area A gives a coupling that is finite without invoking F. The review should either reproduce the derivation of the sqrt(3/(8 L_c^3 F)) prefactor or explicitly flag this regularization as an open issue and soften the Sec. 2.3 statement that the coupling "remains finite" regardless of the quantization volume; otherwise the theoretical proposals in Sec. 4, which mostly assume fixed coupling parameters, are left without a vetted foundation.
[Abstract and Sec. 3] The abstract claims that vacuum-field-induced modifications occur "at equilibrium and room temperature," but the experimental evidence reviewed in Sec. 3 is largely not at room temperature: the quantum Hall experiments (Sec. 3.2) are performed at low temperature with strong magnetic fields, the 1T-TaS2 transition shift (Sec. 3.3) occurs near 120–150 K, and the superconducting part of the YBCO result (Sec. 3.4) is at ~87–92 K. Only the YBCO ferromagnetism enhancement is reported near room temperature. The abstract and Sec. 1.4 should be reworded to separate the theoretical equilibrium claim from the specific temperature regimes of the existing experiments.
[Sec. 4.1 and 4.2] The review presents several contradictory theoretical predictions (e.g., cavity-induced vs cavity-suppressed ferroelectricity in Sec. 4.1; Amperean superconductivity in Refs. [358] vs [359]; enhanced vs reduced Tc in phonon-polariton scenarios in Sec. 4.2.1). While the text notes these contradictions, it does not offer a systematic criterion (e.g., single-mode vs continuum treatment, physical vs bare masses, resonance vs off-resonance conditions) for the reader to judge which predictions are robust. Adding a comparative summary table or a short assessment paragraph after each subsection would materially improve the critical value of the review.

minor comments (3)

[Sec. 5] The opening sentence of Sec. 5 states that "some of us initiated and pioneered" cavity materials engineering; this editorial claim is not substantiated and is better left implicit in a review, which should let the cited literature carry the attribution.
[Sec. 2.6.1, Sec. 2.2.2, Sec. 1.4] There are several typographical errors that should be corrected: "Pauli-Feirz" in Sec. 2.6.1, "Helmoholtz" in Sec. 2.2.2, "addresed" in Sec. 1.4, and "Indeces" in Sec. 2.3.
[Sec. 2.3, Eq. (40)] The notation for the effective coupling strength alternates inconsistently between lowercase "a_eff" and uppercase "A_eff" in the text and Eq. (40); the authors should unify the notation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the review's theoretical spine is heavily self-cited but not self-definitional, and the central equilibrium claims rest on independent experiments and externally checkable derivations.

full rationale

The paper is a review, not a primary derivation, and its claimed prediction chain does not reduce by construction to its inputs. The central theoretical object, the long-wavelength approximation with effective mode volume Veff ~ Lc^3 F, is presented as a result from Ref. [105]: 'Following Ref. [105], the PF Hamiltonian for a 2D material or thin film embedded in a Fabry-Pérot cavity simplifies under the LWA to ...' (Sec. 2.3, Eq. (35)). This is a citation of a prior derivation rather than a re-derivation, and the review does not define the target ground-state change in terms of that equation. Similarly, the QEDFT theorems and electron-photon exchange functional are attributed to prior work (Refs. [77,101,109]), but the review uses them as methods to compute concrete properties, not as a predicate that is equivalent to the conclusion. The experimental evidence for cavity-modified quantum Hall physics, 1T-TaS2 metal-insulator transitions, and YBCO ferromagnetism comes from independent groups (Refs. [89-92]); the review does not fit parameters to those experiments and then claim them as predictions. The MgB2 superconductivity prediction (Sec. 4.2.2) explicitly states that 'the light-matter coupling was treated as a free parameter' and then Tc is computed via QEDFT and Eliashberg theory; this is a parameter scan, not a fitted-input-called-prediction. The statement in Sec. 5.1 that 'some of us initiated and pioneered' the field is a historical self-citation, but it is not load-bearing for any equation or quantitative claim. The concern that Eq. (40)'s effective mode volume may not be rigorously valid for extended planar cavities is a correctness-risk about the cited derivation, not a circularity in the present paper. No equation in the review is shown to be self-defined, and no result is equivalent by construction to a fitted input.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review itself introduces no free parameters and no new physical entities. The quantities listed here are taken from the prior literature the paper reviews, but they are load-bearing for the central claim because the predicted cavity modifications are quantified only through these inputs. The axioms are the standard QED/DFT toolkit plus the paper-specific LWA mode-volume assumption. The most fragile input is the effective mode volume and the treatment of coupling strengths as tunable rather than fully computed.

free parameters (3)

Light-matter coupling strength A_eff (or lambda_alpha) = Not specified; treated as tunable or fitted in most reviewed models
Sec. 2.1.3 Eq. (24) introduces effective photon modes characterized by vacuum field amplitude lambda_alpha; Sec. 4.2.2 states that in Ref. [235] the light-matter coupling was treated as a free parameter but can potentially be computed using MQED. Central predictions scale with this coupling.
Effective cavity frequency omega_c, effective mode volume V_eff, phonon charge Z and mass M = Derived from ab initio or fitted to experimental data
Sec. 2.4 Eq. (41) constructs an effective phonon-photon model and states these parameters 'can be obtained from ab initio calculations or fitted to experimental results.' The phase diagrams in Sec. 4 depend on these inputs.
Hubbard U and hopping t in cavity-modified Hubbard models = Taken from DFT or model estimates
Sec. 4.3.2 reviews Peierls-substituted Hubbard models where t and U are inputs from ab initio calculations or prior fits; cavity modifications to U are explicitly noted as not fully explored.

assumptions (6)

standard math Canonical quantization of the electromagnetic field in Coulomb gauge with Born-von Karman boundary conditions
Sec. 2.1.1 constructs the quantized vector potential and commutation relations used throughout; this is standard QED in non-relativistic form.
domain assumption The non-relativistic Pauli-Fierz Hamiltonian is the correct low-energy starting point for coupled electron-nucleus-photon systems
Sec. 2.1.2 Eq. (22) is presented as the foundational Hamiltonian; its validity for solid-state materials in cavities is assumed, with regularization by ultraviolet cutoff.
ad hoc to paper The long-wavelength approximation retains finite coupling in extended systems through an effective mode volume V_eff ~ L_c^3 F
Sec. 2.3 Eq. (39)-(40) derives a finite effective coupling by replacing the quantization volume with L_c^3 F; this is a modeling assumption specific to the paper's framework and is load-bearing for the theoretical proposals.
domain assumption The Born-Oppenheimer and clamped-nuclei approximations apply to cavity-modified solids
Sec. 2.5.1 and Sec. 2.6.1 decouple electrons, nuclei, and photons; the review assumes adiabatic separation remains valid for the ground-state phenomena discussed.
domain assumption QEDFT provides a bijective mapping between external scalar potentials/currents and charge/photon densities
Sec. 2.6.3 states the mapping and builds the Kohn-Sham system on it; the existence of the needed exchange-correlation functionals is assumed.
domain assumption Macroscopic QED with a dyadic Green's function correctly describes lossy cavity environments
Sec. 2.2.2 introduces MQED as the framework for realistic cavities; it assumes the cavity can be treated as an empty lossy structure separate from the embedded material, a caveat noted in Sec. 2.1.2.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Cavity engineering of solid-state materials without external driving." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/U6L7H5BF

@misc{pith2026250203172,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Cavity engineering of solid-state materials without external driving},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/U6L7H5BF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.03172}
}

read the original abstract

Confining electromagnetic fields inside an optical cavity can enhance the light-matter coupling between quantum materials embedded inside the cavity and the confined photon fields. When the interaction between the matter and the photon fields is strong enough, even the quantum vacuum field fluctuations of the photons confined in the cavity can alter the properties of the cavity-embedded solid-state materials at equilibrium and room temperature. This approach to engineering materials with light avoids fundamental issues of laser-induced transient matter states. To clearly differentiate this field from phenomena in driven systems, we call this emerging field cavity materials engineering. In this review, we first present theoretical frameworks, especially, ab initio methods, for describing light-matter interactions in solid-state materials embedded inside a realistic optical cavity. Next, we overview a few experimental breakthroughs in this domain, detailing how the ground state properties of materials can be altered within such confined photonic environments. Moreover, we discuss state-of-the-art theoretical proposals for tailoring material properties within cavities. Finally, we outline the key challenges and promising avenues for future research in this exciting field.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.03172 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Cavity materials engineering. The research field explores the use of quantum fluctuations of photons inside cavities to control the phases and properties of embedded solid-state materials, particularly within dark cavities (i.e., without external driving). At the center is a Fabry-Pérot cavity, representing a broad class of cavities with embedded solid-state materials. The left panel illustrates how cavity design – … view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Illustration of complexity landscape of polaritonic chemistry. Beyond the inherent complexity of chemical systems (denoted as chemical reactivity) and solvent effects, the introduction of quantum fields and collective molecular behavior within optical cavities significantly increases the challenge of theoretical modeling. Reprinted from D. Sidler et al., J. Chem. Phys., 156, 230901, 2022 [249]; licensed under a Crea… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Cavity-modified integer and fractional Quantum Hall effect of twodimensional electron gas. (a) The setup of the quantum Hall bar embedded inside a split-ring resonator where the vacuum electric field 𝐸vacuum is localized at the edges of the Hall bar sample and is polarized along the 𝑦-axis. The color bar represents the intensity of the field. (b) The longitudinal resistance 𝑅𝑥 𝑥 and Hall resistance 𝑅𝑥 𝑦 as a functi… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (5 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Cavity-modified ferromagnetism and superconducting transition temperature of an unconventional superconductor, YBCO, via field fluctuations. (a) The schematic of the cavity and material setup in the top panel. YBCO is embedded inside the polystyrene (PS) polymer matri…

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Proposed cavity-induced para- to ferro-electric phase transition via quantum vacuum fluctuations in a dark cavity. (a) A paraelectric material with a thickness 𝑑 is embedded inside a Fabry-Pérot cavity with the spatial profile of the energy modes shown next to it (top …

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Cavity-modified superconductivity using QEDFT. (a) MgB2 (Magnesium atoms in orange and Boron atoms in green) is placed inside an optical cavity. Here we explore two cavity setups, an out-of-polarized cavity with one "effective" photon mode perpendicular to the Boron pl…

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Theoretical proposed cavity-modified magnetic phases of electronic systems. (a) The ground state of 𝛼-RuCl3 is a zigzag antiferromagnetic phase outside a cavity (top panel); here Ru atoms are shown in organe, while Cl atoms are shown in green. The red arrows indicate t…

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Proposed electronic topology via quantum vacuum fluctuations. (a) Modified Dirac points of graphene through a chiral photon mode of the optical cavity. Here 𝜆/2 is the cavity mirror distance, 𝑔 is the electron-photon coupling strength, and Δ is the band gap at Dirac po…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Tunable intertwining via collective excitations
cond-mat.quant-gas 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

An asynchronous periodic drive of a BEC in two crossed cavities stabilizes intertwined Landau, multicomponent time-crystalline, and Landau-time-crystalline orders.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[105]

Theory of quantum light-matter interaction in cavities: Extended systems and the long wavelength approximation,

M. K. Svendsen, M. Ruggenthaler, H. Hübener, C. Schäfer, M. Eckstein, A. Rubio, and S. Latini, “Theory of quantum light-matter interaction in cavities: Extended systems and the long wavelength approximation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.17374 (2023)

arXiv 2023
[1]

Recent progress of high-entropy materials for energy storage and conversion,

A. Amiri and R. Shahbazian-Yassar, “Recent progress of high-entropy materials for energy storage and conversion,” J. Mater. Chem. A9, 782–823 (2021)

2021
[2]

Materialsforfuturenuclearenergysystems,

G.S.Was,D.Petti,S.Ukai,andS.Zinkle,“Materialsforfuturenuclearenergysystems,”J.Nucl.Mater. 527,151837 (2019)

2019
[3]

2D materials for quantum information science,

X. Liu and M. C. Hersam, “2D materials for quantum information science,” Nat Rev Mater4, 669–684 (2019)

2019
[4]

Materials challenges and opportunities for quantum computing hardware,

N. P. de Leon, K. M. Itoh, D. Kim, K. K. Mehta, T. E. Northup, H. Paik, B. S. Palmer, N. Samarth, S. Sangtawesin, and D. W. Steuerman, “Materials challenges and opportunities for quantum computing hardware,” Science372, eabb2823 (2021)

2021
[5]

Material platforms for spin-based photonic quantum technologies,

M. Atatüre, D. Englund, N. Vamivakas, S.-Y. Lee, and J. Wrachtrup, “Material platforms for spin-based photonic quantum technologies,” Nat Rev Mater3, 38–51 (2018)

2018
[6]

Advantages and challenges of novel materials for future space applications,

L. Pernigoni and A. M. Grande, “Advantages and challenges of novel materials for future space applications,” Front. Space Technol.4, 1253419 (2023)

2023
[7]

Advanced materials for next-generation spacecraft,

I. Levchenko, K. Bazaka, T. Belmonte, M. Keidar, and S. Xu, “Advanced materials for next-generation spacecraft,” Adv. Mater.30, 1802201 (2018)

2018

Show all 300 references

[8]

W. D. Callister Jr and D. G. Rethwisch,Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction(John Wiley & Sons, 2020)

2020
[9]

W. F. Smith and J. Hashemi,Foundations of Materials Science and Engineering(McGraw-Hill, 2022)

2022
[10]

N. W. Ashcroft and N. D. Mermin,Solid State Physics(Cengage Learning, 2011)

2011
[11]

Phase transitions in 2D materials,

W. Li, X. Qian, and J. Li, “Phase transitions in 2D materials,” Nat Rev Mater6, 829–846 (2021)

2021
[12]

Engineering van der Waals materials for advanced metaphotonics,

H. Lin, Z. Zhang, H. Zhang, K.-T. Lin, X. Wen, Y. Liang, Y. Fu, A. K. T. Lau, T. Ma, C.-W. Qiu, and B. Jia, “Engineering van der Waals materials for advanced metaphotonics,” Chem. Rev.122, 15204–15355 (2022)

2022
[13]

Altland and B

A. Altland and B. Simons,Condensed Matter Field Theory(Cambridge University Press, 2023)

2023
[14]

Coleman,Introduction to Many-Body Physics(Cambridge University Press, 2015)

P. Coleman,Introduction to Many-Body Physics(Cambridge University Press, 2015)

2015
[15]

Grosso and G

G. Grosso and G. P. Parravicini,Solid State Physics(Academic Press, 2013)

2013
[16]

Bruus and K

H. Bruus and K. Flensberg,Many-Body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics: An Introduction(OUP Oxford, 2004)

2004
[17]

C.Cohen-Tannoudji,J.Dupont-Roc,andG.Grynberg, PhotonsandAtoms: IntroductiontoQuantumElectrodynamics (Wiley, 1989)

1989
[18]

Cohen-Tannoudji, J

C. Cohen-Tannoudji, J. Dupont-Roc, and G. Grynberg,Atom-Photon Interactions: Basic Processes and Applications (John Wiley & Sons, 1998)

1998
[19]

Mandl and G

F. Mandl and G. Shaw,Quantum Field Theory(John Wiley & Sons, 2013)

2013
[20]

Fine structure of the hydrogen atom by a microwave method,

W. E. Lamb and R. C. Retherford, “Fine structure of the hydrogen atom by a microwave method,” Phys. Rev.72, 241–243 (1947)

1947
[21]

History and some aspects of the Lamb shift,

G. J. Maclay, “History and some aspects of the Lamb shift,” Physics2, 105–149 (2020)

2020
[22]

On the attraction between two perfectly conducting plates,

H. B. G. Casimir, “On the attraction between two perfectly conducting plates,” Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wet.51, 793 (1948)

1948
[23]

Materials perspective on Casimir and van der Waals interactions,

L. M. Woods, D. A. R. Dalvit, A. Tkatchenko, P. Rodriguez-Lopez, A. W. Rodriguez, and R. Podgornik, “Materials perspective on Casimir and van der Waals interactions,” Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 045003 (2016)

2016
[24]

M. E. Peskin,An Introduction To Quantum Field Theory(CRC Press, 2018)

2018
[25]

Towards properties on demand in quantum materials,

D. N. Basov, R. D. Averitt, and D. Hsieh, “Towards properties on demand in quantum materials,” Nat. Mater16, 1077–1088 (2017)

2017
[26]

Floquetengineeringofquantummaterials,

T.OkaandS.Kitamura,“Floquetengineeringofquantummaterials,”Annu.Rev.Condens.MatterPhys. 10,387–408 (2019)

2019
[27]

Band structure engineering and non-equilibrium dynamics in Floquet topological insulators,

M. S. Rudner and N. H. Lindner, “Band structure engineering and non-equilibrium dynamics in Floquet topological insulators,” Nat Rev Phys2, 229–244 (2020)

2020
[28]

Engineering crystal structures with light,

A. S. Disa, T. F. Nova, and A. Cavalleri, “Engineering crystal structures with light,” Nat. Phys.17, 1087–1092 (2021)

2021
[29]

Colloquium: Nonthermal pathways to ultrafast control in quantum materials,

A. de la Torre, D. M. Kennes, M. Claassen, S. Gerber, J. W. McIver, and M. A. Sentef, “Colloquium: Nonthermal pathways to ultrafast control in quantum materials,” Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 041002 (2021)

2021
[30]

Light-inducedemergentphenomenain2Dmaterialsandtopologicalmaterials,

C.Bao,P.Tang,D.Sun,andS.Zhou,“Light-inducedemergentphenomenain2Dmaterialsandtopologicalmaterials,” Nat Rev Phys4, 33–48 (2022)

2022
[31]

Strongly correlated electron–photon systems,

J. Bloch, A. Cavalleri, V. Galitski, M. Hafezi, and A. Rubio, “Strongly correlated electron–photon systems,” Nature 606, 41–48 (2022)

2022
[32]

A. M. Fox,Optical Properties of Solids(Oxford University Press, 2001)

2001
[33]

Terahertz control of many-body dynamics in quantum materials,

C.-J. Yang, J. Li, M. Fiebig, and S. Pal, “Terahertz control of many-body dynamics in quantum materials,” Nat Rev Mater8, 518–532 (2023)

2023
[34]

Metastable ferroelectricity in optically strained SrTiO3,

T. F. Nova, A. S. Disa, M. Fechner, and A. Cavalleri, “Metastable ferroelectricity in optically strained SrTiO3,” Science 364, 1075–1079 (2019)

2019
[35]

Light-induced anomalous Hall effect in graphene,

J. W. McIver, B. Schulte, F.-U. Stein, T. Matsuyama, G. Jotzu, G. Meier, and A. Cavalleri, “Light-induced anomalous Hall effect in graphene,” Nat. Phys.16, 38–41 (2020)

2020
[36]

Floquet states in dissipative open quantum systems,

S. A. Sato, U. D. Giovannini, S. Aeschlimann, I. Gierz, H. Hübener, and A. Rubio, “Floquet states in dissipative open quantum systems,” J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.53, 225601 (2020)

2020
[37]

Survival of Floquet–Bloch states in the presence of scattering,

S. Aeschlimann, S. A. Sato, R. Krause, M. Chávez-Cervantes, U. D. Giovannini, H. Hübener, S. Forti, C. Coletti, K. Hanff, K. Rossnagel, A. Rubio, and I. Gierz, “Survival of Floquet–Bloch states in the presence of scattering,” Nano Lett.21, 5028–5035 (2021)

2021
[38]

Floquet engineering the band structure of materials with optimal control theory,

A. Castro, U. De Giovannini, S. A. Sato, H. Hübener, and A. Rubio, “Floquet engineering the band structure of materials with optimal control theory,” Phys. Rev. Res.4, 033213 (2022)

2022
[39]

Light-driven raman coherence as a nonthermal route to ultrafast topology switching in a dirac semimetal,

C. Vaswani, L.-L. Wang, D. H. Mudiyanselage, Q. Li, P. M. Lozano, G. D. Gu, D. Cheng, B. Song, L. Luo, R. H. J. Kim, C. Huang, Z. Liu, M. Mootz, I. E. Perakis, Y. Yao, K. M. Ho, and J. Wang, “Light-driven raman coherence as a nonthermal route to ultrafast topology switching in...

2020
[40]

An ultrafast symmetry switch in a Weyl semimetal,

E. J. Sie, C. M. Nyby, C. D. Pemmaraju, S. J. Park, X. Shen, J. Yang, M. C. Hoffmann, B. K. Ofori-Okai, R. Li, A. H. Reid, S. Weathersby, E. Mannebach, N. Finney, D. Rhodes, D. Chenet, A. Antony, L. Balicas, J. Hone, T. P. Devereaux, T. F. Heinz, X. Wang, and A. M. Lindenberg,...

2019
[41]

Floquet engineering with quantum optimal control theory,

A. Castro, U. D. Giovannini, S. A. Sato, H. Hübener, and A. Rubio, “Floquet engineering with quantum optimal control theory,” New J. Phys.25, 043023 (2023)

2023
[42]

Floquet states in open quantum systems,

T. Mori, “Floquet states in open quantum systems,” Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.14, 35–56 (2023)

2023
[43]

Strong interactions of single atoms and photons in cavity QED,

H. J. Kimble, “Strong interactions of single atoms and photons in cavity QED,” Phys. Scr.1998, 127 (1998)

1998
[44]

Manipulatingquantumentanglementwithatomsandphotonsinacavity,

J.M.Raimond,M.Brune,andS.Haroche,“Manipulatingquantumentanglementwithatomsandphotonsinacavity,” Rev. Mod. Phys.73, 565–582 (2001)

2001
[45]

Cavity quantum electrodynamics: Coherence in context,

H. Mabuchi and A. C. Doherty, “Cavity quantum electrodynamics: Coherence in context,” Science298, 1372–1377 (2002)

2002
[46]

New frontiers in quantum information with atoms and ions,

J. I. Cirac and P. Zoller, “New frontiers in quantum information with atoms and ions,” Phys. Today57, 38–44 (2004)

2004
[47]

Electromagnetically induced transparency: Optics in coherent media,

M. Fleischhauer, A. Imamoglu, and J. P. Marangos, “Electromagnetically induced transparency: Optics in coherent media,” Rev. Mod. Phys.77, 633–673 (2005)

2005
[48]

Cavity quantum electrodynamics,

H. Walther, B. T. H. Varcoe, B.-G. Englert, and T. Becker, “Cavity quantum electrodynamics,” Rep. Prog. Phys.69, 1325 (2006)

2006
[49]

Colloquium: Quantum matter built from nanoscopic lattices of atoms and photons,

D. E. Chang, J. S. Douglas, A. González-Tudela, C.-L. Hung, and H. J. Kimble, “Colloquium: Quantum matter built from nanoscopic lattices of atoms and photons,” Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 031002 (2018)

2018
[50]

Cavity QED with quantum gases: New paradigms in many-body physics,

F. Mivehvar, F. Piazza, T. Donner, and H. Ritsch, “Cavity QED with quantum gases: New paradigms in many-body physics,” Adv. Phys.70, 1–153 (2021)

2021
[51]

Haroche and J.-M

S. Haroche and J.-M. Raimond,Exploring the Quantum: Atoms, Cavities, and Photons(OUP Oxford, 2006)

2006
[52]

Ultrastrong coupling regimes of light-matter interaction,

P. Forn-Díaz, L. Lamata, E. Rico, J. Kono, and E. Solano, “Ultrastrong coupling regimes of light-matter interaction,” Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 025005 (2019)

2019
[53]

Ultrastrong coupling between light and matter,

A. Frisk Kockum, A. Miranowicz, S. De Liberato, S. Savasta, and F. Nori, “Ultrastrong coupling between light and matter,” Nat Rev Phys1, 19–40 (2019)

2019
[54]

Spontaneous emission probabilities at radio frequencies,

E. M. Purcell, “Spontaneous emission probabilities at radio frequencies,” inConfined Electrons and Photons: New Physics and Applications,E. Burstein and C. Weisbuch, eds. (Springer US, Boston, MA, 1995), pp. 839–839

1995
[55]

Observation of cavity-enhanced single-atom spontaneous emission,

P. Goy, J. M. Raimond, M. Gross, and S. Haroche, “Observation of cavity-enhanced single-atom spontaneous emission,” Phys. Rev. Lett.50, 1903–1906 (1983)

1983
[56]

Inhibited spontaneous emission in solid-state physics and electronics,

E. Yablonovitch, “Inhibited spontaneous emission in solid-state physics and electronics,” Phys. Rev. Lett.58, 2059–2062 (1987)

1987
[57]

Quantum Rabi oscillation: A direct test of field quantization in a cavity,

M. Brune, F. Schmidt-Kaler, A. Maali, J. Dreyer, E. Hagley, J. M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, “Quantum Rabi oscillation: A direct test of field quantization in a cavity,” Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 1800–1803 (1996)

1996
[58]

Observation of the coupled exciton-photon mode splitting in a semiconductor quantum microcavity,

C. Weisbuch, M. Nishioka, A. Ishikawa, and Y. Arakawa, “Observation of the coupled exciton-photon mode splitting in a semiconductor quantum microcavity,” Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 3314–3317 (1992)

1992
[59]

Bose–Einstein condensation of exciton polaritons,

J. Kasprzak, M. Richard, S. Kundermann, A. Baas, P. Jeambrun, J. M. J. Keeling, F. M. Marchetti, M. H. Szymańska, R. André, J. L. Staehli, V. Savona, P. B. Littlewood, B. Deveaud, and L. S. Dang, “Bose–Einstein condensation of exciton polaritons,” Nature443, 409–414 (2006)

2006
[60]

Phase transition in the Dicke model of superradiance,

Y. K. Wang and F. T. Hioe, “Phase transition in the Dicke model of superradiance,” Phys. Rev. A7, 831–836 (1973)

1973
[61]

Polariton panorama,

D. N. Basov, A. Asenjo-Garcia, P. J. Schuck, X. Zhu, and A. Rubio, “Polariton panorama,” Nanophotonics10, 549–577 (2021)

2021
[62]

Rahimi-Iman,Polariton Physics: From Dynamic Bose–Einstein Condensates in Strongly-Coupled Light–Matter Systems to Polariton Lasers(Springer Nature, 2020)

A. Rahimi-Iman,Polariton Physics: From Dynamic Bose–Einstein Condensates in Strongly-Coupled Light–Matter Systems to Polariton Lasers(Springer Nature, 2020)

2020
[63]

Exciton-polariton Bose-Einstein condensation,

H. Deng, H. Haug, and Y. Yamamoto, “Exciton-polariton Bose-Einstein condensation,” Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1489–1537 (2010)

2010
[64]

Exciton–polariton condensates,

T. Byrnes, N. Y. Kim, and Y. Yamamoto, “Exciton–polariton condensates,” Nat. Phys10, 803–813 (2014)

2014
[65]

Continuous transition between weak and ultrastrong coupling through exceptional points in carbon nanotube microcavity exciton–polaritons,

W. Gao, X. Li, M. Bamba, and J. Kono, “Continuous transition between weak and ultrastrong coupling through exceptional points in carbon nanotube microcavity exciton–polaritons,” Nat. Photon12, 362–367 (2018)

2018
[66]

Vacuum Bloch–Siegert shift in Landau polaritons with ultra-high cooperativity,

X. Li, M. Bamba, Q. Zhang, S. Fallahi, G. C. Gardner, W. Gao, M. Lou, K. Yoshioka, M. J. Manfra, and J. Kono, “Vacuum Bloch–Siegert shift in Landau polaritons with ultra-high cooperativity,” Nat. Photon12, 324–329 (2018)

2018
[67]

EnhancednonlinearinteractionofpolaritonsviaexcitonicRydbergstatesinmonolayerWSe 2,

J. Gu, V. Walther, L. Waldecker, D. Rhodes, A. Raja, J. C. Hone, T. F. Heinz, S. Kéna-Cohen, T. Pohl, and V. M. Menon,“EnhancednonlinearinteractionofpolaritonsviaexcitonicRydbergstatesinmonolayerWSe 2,”NatCommun 12, 2269 (2021)

2021
[68]

Cavity magnonics,

B. Zare Rameshti, S. Viola Kusminskiy, J. A. Haigh, K. Usami, D. Lachance-Quirion, Y. Nakamura, C.-M. Hu, H. X. Tang, G. E. W. Bauer, and Y. M. Blanter, “Cavity magnonics,” Phys. Reports979, 1–61 (2022)

2022
[69]

Highly nonlinear dipolar exciton-polaritons in bilayer MoS2,

B. Datta, M. Khatoniar, P. Deshmukh, F. Thouin, R. Bushati, S. De Liberato, S. K. Cohen, and V. M. Menon, “Highly nonlinear dipolar exciton-polaritons in bilayer MoS2,” Nat Commun13, 6341 (2022)

2022
[70]

Spin-correlated exciton–polaritons in a van der Waals magnet,

F. Dirnberger, R. Bushati, B. Datta, A. Kumar, A. H. MacDonald, E. Baldini, and V. M. Menon, “Spin-correlated exciton–polaritons in a van der Waals magnet,” Nat. Nanotechnol.17, 1060–1064 (2022)

2022
[71]

Radiative pumping of exciton-polaritons in 2D hybrid perovskites,

P. Deshmukh, L. Zhao, S. Satapathy, M. Khatoniar, B. Datta, B. P. Rand, and V. Menon, “Radiative pumping of exciton-polaritons in 2D hybrid perovskites,” Opt. Mater. Express13, 1655–1662 (2023)

2023
[72]

Terahertz cavity magnon polaritons,

T. E. Kritzell, A. Baydin, F. Tay, R. Rodriguez, J. Doumani, H. Nojiri, H. O. Everitt, I. Barsukov, and J. Kono, “Terahertz cavity magnon polaritons,” Adv. Opt. Mater.12, 2302270 (2024)

2024
[73]

Extreme light confinement and control in low-symmetry phonon-polaritonic crystals,

E. Galiffi, G. Carini, X. Ni, G. Álvarez-Pérez, S. Yves, E. M. Renzi, R. Nolen, S. Wasserroth, M. Wolf, P. Alonso- Gonzalez, A. Paarmann, and A. Alù, “Extreme light confinement and control in low-symmetry phonon-polaritonic crystals,” Nat Rev Mater9, 9–28 (2024)

2024
[74]

Zeeman polaritons as a platform for probing Dicke physics in condensed matter,

T. E. Kritzell, J. Doumani, T. Asano, S. Yamada, F. Tay, H. Xu, H. Yan, I. Katayama, J. Takeda, A. Nevidomskyy, H. Nojiri, M. Bamba, A. Baydin, and J. Kono, “Zeeman polaritons as a platform for probing Dicke physics in condensed matter,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.17339 (2024)

2024 arXiv
[75]

Cavity-mediated superthermal phonon correlations in the ultrastrong coupling regime,

D. Kim, J. Hou, G. Lee, A. Agrawal, S. Kim, H. Zhang, D. Bao, A. Baydin, W. Wu, F. Tay, S. Huang, E. E. M. Chia, D.-S. Kim, M. Seo, A. D. Mohite, D. Hagenmüller, and J. Kono, “Cavity-mediated superthermal phonon correlations in the ultrastrong coupling regime,” arXiv preprint ...

2024
[76]

Introduction: Polaritonic chemistry,

T. W. Ebbesen, A. Rubio, and G. D. Scholes, “Introduction: Polaritonic chemistry,” Chem. Rev.123, 12037–12038 (2023)

2023
[77]

Quantum-electrodynamical density-functional theory: Bridging quantum optics and electronic-structure theory,

M. Ruggenthaler, J. Flick, C. Pellegrini, H. Appel, I. V. Tokatly, and A. Rubio, “Quantum-electrodynamical density-functional theory: Bridging quantum optics and electronic-structure theory,” Phys. Rev. A90, 012508 (2014)

2014
[78]

Hybrid light–matter states in a molecular and material science perspective,

T. W. Ebbesen, “Hybrid light–matter states in a molecular and material science perspective,” Acc. Chem. Res.49, 2403–2412 (2016)

2016
[79]

From a quantum-electrodynamical light–matter description to novel spectroscopies,

M. Ruggenthaler, N. Tancogne-Dejean, J. Flick, H. Appel, and A. Rubio, “From a quantum-electrodynamical light–matter description to novel spectroscopies,” Nat Rev Chem2, 0118 (2018)

2018
[80]

Chapter Three - Ultrastrong light–matter coupling in semiconductors,

N. M. Peraca, A. Baydin, W. Gao, M. Bamba, and J. Kono, “Chapter Three - Ultrastrong light–matter coupling in semiconductors,” inSemiconductors and Semimetals,vol. 105 ofSemiconductor Quantum Science and Technology S. T. Cundiff and M. Kira, eds. (Elsevier, 2020), pp. 89–151

2020
[81]

Engineering quantum materials with chiral optical cavities,

H. Hübener, U. De Giovannini, C. Schäfer, J. Andberger, M. Ruggenthaler, J. Faist, and A. Rubio, “Engineering quantum materials with chiral optical cavities,” Nat. Mater.20, 438–442 (2021)

2021
[82]

Manipulating matter by strong coupling to vacuum fields,

F. J. Garcia-Vidal, C. Ciuti, and T. W. Ebbesen, “Manipulating matter by strong coupling to vacuum fields,” Science 373, eabd0336 (2021)

2021
[83]

Cavity quantum materials,

F. Schlawin, D. M. Kennes, and M. A. Sentef, “Cavity quantum materials,” Appl. Phys. Rev.9, 011312 (2022)

2022
[84]

Understanding polaritonic chemistry from ab initio quantum electrody- namics,

M. Ruggenthaler, D. Sidler, and A. Rubio, “Understanding polaritonic chemistry from ab initio quantum electrody- namics,” Chem. Rev.123, 11191–11229 (2023)

2023
[85]

Light–matter interactions with photonic quasiparticles,

N. Rivera and I. Kaminer, “Light–matter interactions with photonic quasiparticles,” Nat Rev Phys2, 538–561 (2020)

2020
[86]

Quantum materials engineering by structured cavity vacuum fluctuations,

H. Hübener, E. V. Boström, M. Claassen, S. Latini, and A. Rubio, “Quantum materials engineering by structured cavity vacuum fluctuations,” Mater. Quantum. Technol.4, 023002 (2024)

2024
[87]

M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy,Quantum Optics(Cambridge University Press, 1997)

1997
[88]

Macroscopic QED - concepts and applications,

S. Scheel and S. Y. Buhmann, “Macroscopic QED - concepts and applications,” arXiv preprint arXiv:0902.3586 (2009)

2009 arXiv
[89]

Breakdown of topological protection by cavity vacuum fields in the integer quantum Hall effect,

F. Appugliese, J. Enkner, G. L. Paravicini-Bagliani, M. Beck, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, G. Scalari, C. Ciuti, and J. Faist, “Breakdown of topological protection by cavity vacuum fields in the integer quantum Hall effect,” Science 375, 1030–1034 (2022)

2022
[90]

Enhanced fractional quantum Hall gaps in a two-dimensional electron gas coupled to a hovering split-ring resonator,

J. Enkner, L. Graziotto, D. Boriçi, F. Appugliese, C. Reichl, G. Scalari, N. Regnault, W. Wegscheider, C. Ciuti, and J. Faist, “Enhanced fractional quantum Hall gaps in a two-dimensional electron gas coupled to a hovering split-ring resonator,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.18362 (2024)

2024 arXiv
[91]

Cavity-mediated thermal control of metal-to-insulator transition in 1T-TaS2,

G. Jarc, S. Y. Mathengattil, A. Montanaro, F. Giusti, E. M. Rigoni, R. Sergo, F. Fassioli, S. Winnerl, S. Dal Zilio, D. Mihailovic, P. Prelovšek, M. Eckstein, and D. Fausti, “Cavity-mediated thermal control of metal-to-insulator transition in 1T-TaS2,” Nature622, 487–492 (2023)

2023
[92]

Large enhancement of ferromagnetism under a collective strong coupling of YBCO nanoparticles,

A. Thomas, E. Devaux, K. Nagarajan, G. Rogez, M. Seidel, F. Richard, C. Genet, M. Drillon, and T. W. Ebbesen, “Large enhancement of ferromagnetism under a collective strong coupling of YBCO nanoparticles,” Nano Lett.21, 4365–4370 (2021)

2021
[93]

Atoms and molecules in cavities, from weak to strong coupling in quantum-electrodynamics (QED) chemistry,

J. Flick, M. Ruggenthaler, H. Appel, and A. Rubio, “Atoms and molecules in cavities, from weak to strong coupling in quantum-electrodynamics (QED) chemistry,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.114, 3026–3034 (2017)

2017
[94]

Grynberg, A

G. Grynberg, A. Aspect, and C. Fabre,Introduction to Quantum Optics: From the Semi-classical Approach to Quantized Light(Cambridge University Press, 2010)

2010
[95]

Srednicki,Quantum Field Theory(Cambridge University Press, 2007)

M. Srednicki,Quantum Field Theory(Cambridge University Press, 2007)

2007
[96]

Greiner and J

W. Greiner and J. Reinhardt,Quantum Electrodynamics(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012)

2012
[97]

G. B. Folland,Quantum Field Theory: A Tourist Guide for Mathematicians(American Mathematical Soc., 2021)

2021
[98]

J. C. Baez, I. E. Segal, and Z. Zhou,Introduction to Algebraic and Constructive Quantum Field Theory(Princeton University Press, 2014)

2014
[99]

Spohn,Dynamics of Charged Particles and Their Radiation Field(Cambridge University Press, 2004)

H. Spohn,Dynamics of Charged Particles and Their Radiation Field(Cambridge University Press, 2004)

2004
[100]

Thirring,Quantum Mathematical Physics: Atoms, Molecules and Large Systems(Springer Science & Business Media, 2013)

W. Thirring,Quantum Mathematical Physics: Atoms, Molecules and Large Systems(Springer Science & Business Media, 2013)

2013
[101]

Light-matter interactions within the Ehrenfest–Maxwell–Pauli–Kohn–Sham framework: Fundamentals, implementation, and nano-optical applications,

R. Jestädt, M. Ruggenthaler, M. J. T. Oliveira, A. Rubio, and H. Appel, “Light-matter interactions within the Ehrenfest–Maxwell–Pauli–Kohn–Sham framework: Fundamentals, implementation, and nano-optical applications,” Adv. Phys.68, 225–333 (2019)

2019
[102]

Mass renormalization and energy level shift in non-relativistic QED,

C. Hainzl and R. Seiringer, “Mass renormalization and energy level shift in non-relativistic QED,” arXiv preprint arXiv:math-ph/0205044 (2003)

2003 arXiv
[103]

Free electron gas in cavity quantum electrodynamics,

V. Rokaj, M. Ruggenthaler, F. G. Eich, and A. Rubio, “Free electron gas in cavity quantum electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. Res.4, 013012 (2022)

2022
[104]

Infinities in molecular quantum electrodynamics and generalized functions,

R. G. Woolley, “Infinities in molecular quantum electrodynamics and generalized functions,” Phys. Rev. A110, 012204 (2024)

2024
[106]

Cavity-inducedmodificationsofmolecularstructureinthestrong-coupling regime,

J.Galego,F.J.Garcia-Vidal,andJ.Feist,“Cavity-inducedmodificationsofmolecularstructureinthestrong-coupling regime,” Phys. Rev. X5, 041022 (2015)

2015
[107]

Cavity Born–Oppenheimer approximation for correlated electron–nuclear-photon systems,

J. Flick, H. Appel, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Rubio, “Cavity Born–Oppenheimer approximation for correlated electron–nuclear-photon systems,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.13, 1616–1625 (2017)

2017
[108]

Ab initio nonrelativistic quantum electrodynamics: Bridging quantum chemistry and quantum optics from weak to strong coupling,

C. Schäfer, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Rubio, “Ab initio nonrelativistic quantum electrodynamics: Bridging quantum chemistry and quantum optics from weak to strong coupling,” Phys. Rev. A98, 043801 (2018)

2018
[109]

Making ab initio QED functional(s): Nonperturbative and photon-free effective frameworks for strong light–matter coupling,

C. Schäfer, F. Buchholz, M. Penz, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Rubio, “Making ab initio QED functional(s): Nonperturbative and photon-free effective frameworks for strong light–matter coupling,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.118, e2110464118 (2021)

2021
[110]

Electron-photon exchange- correlation approximation for quantum-electrodynamical density-functional theory,

I.-T. Lu, M. Ruggenthaler, N. Tancogne-Dejean, S. Latini, M. Penz, and A. Rubio, “Electron-photon exchange- correlation approximation for quantum-electrodynamical density-functional theory,” Phys. Rev. A109, 052823 (2024)

2024
[111]

Cavity-renormalized quantum criticality in a honeycomb bilayer antiferromagnet,

L. Weber, E. Viñas Boström, M. Claassen, A. Rubio, and D. M. Kennes, “Cavity-renormalized quantum criticality in a honeycomb bilayer antiferromagnet,” Commun Phys6, 247 (2023)

2023
[112]

Polaritonic coupled-cluster theory,

U. Mordovina, C. Bungey, H. Appel, P. J. Knowles, A. Rubio, and F. R. Manby, “Polaritonic coupled-cluster theory,” Phys. Rev. Res.2, 023262 (2020)

2020
[113]

Coupled cluster theory for molecular polaritons: Changing ground and excited states,

T. S. Haugland, E. Ronca, E. F. Kjønstad, A. Rubio, and H. Koch, “Coupled cluster theory for molecular polaritons: Changing ground and excited states,” Phys. Rev. X10, 041043 (2020)

2020
[114]

Strong coupling in chiral cavities: Nonperturbative framework for enantiomer discrimination,

R. R. Riso, L. Grazioli, E. Ronca, T. Giovannini, and H. Koch, “Strong coupling in chiral cavities: Nonperturbative framework for enantiomer discrimination,” Phys. Rev. X13, 031002 (2023)

2023
[115]

Time-dependent density functionaltheory for many-electronsystemsinteracting with cavity photons,

I. V.Tokatly, “Time-dependent density functionaltheory for many-electronsystemsinteracting with cavity photons,” Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 233001 (2013)

2013
[116]

Optimized effective potential for quantum electrodynamical time-dependent density functional theory,

C. Pellegrini, J. Flick, I. V. Tokatly, H. Appel, and A. Rubio, “Optimized effective potential for quantum electrodynamical time-dependent density functional theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 093001 (2015)

2015
[117]

Photonic bound states in the continuum in nanostructures,

H. Zhong, T. He, Y. Meng, and Q. Xiao, “Photonic bound states in the continuum in nanostructures,” Materials16, 7112 (2023)

2023
[118]

Optical cavity design and functionality for molecular strong coupling,

K. Hirai, J. Andell Hutchison, and H. Uji-i, “Optical cavity design and functionality for molecular strong coupling,” Chem. – A Eur. J.30, e202303110 (2024)

2024
[119]

Tunable cryogenic terahertz cavity for strong light–matter coupling in complex materials,

G. Jarc, S. Y. Mathengattil, F. Giusti, M. Barnaba, A. Singh, A. Montanaro, F. Glerean, E. M. Rigoni, S. D. Zilio, S. Winnerl, and D. Fausti, “Tunable cryogenic terahertz cavity for strong light–matter coupling in complex materials,” Rev. Sci. Instruments93, 033102 (2022)

2022
[120]

Ultrastrong coupling in the near field of complementary split-ring resonators,

C. Maissen, G. Scalari, F. Valmorra, M. Beck, J. Faist, S. Cibella, R. Leoni, C. Reichl, C. Charpentier, and W. Wegscheider, “Ultrastrong coupling in the near field of complementary split-ring resonators,” Phys. Rev. B90, 205309 (2014)

2014
[121]

Cavity electrodynamics of van der Waals heterostructures,

G. Kipp, H. M. Bretscher, B. Schulte, D. Herrmann, K. Kusyak, M. W. Day, S. Kesavan, T. Matsuyama, X. Li, S. M. Langner, J. Hagelstein, F. Sturm, A. M. Potts, C. J. Eckhardt, Y. Huang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Rubio, D. M. Kennes, M. A. Sentef, E. Baudin, G. Meier, M. H. ...

2024 arXiv
[122]

High-quality nanocavities through multimodal confinement of hyperbolic polaritons in hexagonal boron nitride,

H.HerzigSheinfux,L.Orsini,M.Jung,I.Torre,M.Ceccanti,S.Marconi,R.Maniyara,D.BarconsRuiz,A.Hötger, R. Bertini, S. Castilla, N. C. H. Hesp, E. Janzen, A. Holleitner, V. Pruneri, J. H. Edgar, G. Shvets, and F. H. L. Koppens, “High-quality nanocavities through multimodal confinemen...

2024
[123]

Collective non-perturbative coupling of 2D electrons with high-quality-factor terahertz cavity photons,

Q. Zhang, M. Lou, X. Li, J. L. Reno, W. Pan, J. D. Watson, M. J. Manfra, and J. Kono, “Collective non-perturbative coupling of 2D electrons with high-quality-factor terahertz cavity photons,” Nat. Phys12, 1005–1011 (2016)

2016
[124]

Quantizationoftheelectromagneticfieldindielectrics,

B.HuttnerandS.M.Barnett, “Quantizationoftheelectromagneticfieldindielectrics,” Phys.Rev.A 46, 4306–4322 (1992)

1992
[125]

B. E. A. Saleh and M. C. Teich,Fundamentals of Photonics(John Wiley & Sons, 2019)

2019
[126]

Dispersion and loss in a Hopfield dielectric,

B. Huttner and S. M. Barnett, “Dispersion and loss in a Hopfield dielectric,” EPL18, 487 (1992)

1992
[127]

W. C. Chew,Waves and Fields in Inhomogenous Media(John Wiley & Sons, 1999)

1999
[128]

Novotny and B

L. Novotny and B. Hecht,Principles of Nano-Optics(Cambridge University Press, 2012)

2012
[129]

Combiningdensityfunctional theory with macroscopic QED for quantum light-matter interactions in 2D materials,

M.K.Svendsen,Y.Kurman,P.Schmidt,F.Koppens,I.Kaminer,andK.S.Thygesen,“Combiningdensityfunctional theory with macroscopic QED for quantum light-matter interactions in 2D materials,” Nat Commun12, 2778 (2021)

2021
[130]

Abinitiocalculationsofquantumlight–matterinteractions in general electromagnetic environments,

M.K.Svendsen, K.S.Thygesen, A.Rubio, andJ.Flick, “Abinitiocalculationsofquantumlight–matterinteractions in general electromagnetic environments,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.20, 926–936 (2024)

2024
[131]

Finite-element modeling of spontaneous emission of a quantum emitter at nanoscale proximity to plasmonic waveguides,

Y. Chen, T. R. Nielsen, N. Gregersen, P. Lodahl, and J. Mørk, “Finite-element modeling of spontaneous emission of a quantum emitter at nanoscale proximity to plasmonic waveguides,” Phys. Rev. B81, 125431 (2010)

2010
[132]

Inverse design of light–matter interactions in macroscopic QED,

R. Bennett and S. Y. Buhmann, “Inverse design of light–matter interactions in macroscopic QED,” New J. Phys.22, 093014 (2020)

2020
[133]

S. Y. Buhmann, Dispersion Forces I: Macroscopic Quantum Electrodynamics and Ground-State Casimir, Casimir–Polder and van Der Waals Forces(Springer, 2013)

2013
[134]

Quantum dynamics of a molecular emitter strongly coupled with surface plasmon polaritons: A macroscopic quantum electrodynamics approach,

S. Wang, G. D. Scholes, and L.-Y. Hsu, “Quantum dynamics of a molecular emitter strongly coupled with surface plasmon polaritons: A macroscopic quantum electrodynamics approach,” J. Chem. Phys.151, 014105 (2019)

2019
[135]

Macroscopic quantum electrodynamics approach to nonlinear optics and application to polaritonic quantum-vacuum detection,

F. Lindel, R. Bennett, and S. Y. Buhmann, “Macroscopic quantum electrodynamics approach to nonlinear optics and application to polaritonic quantum-vacuum detection,” Phys. Rev. A103, 033705 (2021)

2021
[136]

Macroscopic quantum electrodynamics theory of resonance energy transfer involving chiral molecules,

J. C. Franz, S. Y. Buhmann, and A. Salam, “Macroscopic quantum electrodynamics theory of resonance energy transfer involving chiral molecules,” Phys. Rev. A107, 032809 (2023)

2023
[137]

Buhmann,Dispersion Forces II: Many-Body Effects, Excited Atoms, Finite Temperature and Quantum Friction (Springer, 2013)

S. Buhmann,Dispersion Forces II: Many-Body Effects, Excited Atoms, Finite Temperature and Quantum Friction (Springer, 2013)

2013
[138]

Nano-imaging of intersubband transitions in van der Waals quantum wells,

P. Schmidt, F. Vialla, S. Latini, M. Massicotte, K.-J. Tielrooĳ, S. Mastel, G. Navickaite, M. Danovich, D. A. Ruiz-Tĳerina, C. Yelgel, V. Fal’ko, K. S. Thygesen, R. Hillenbrand, and F. H. L. Koppens, “Nano-imaging of intersubband transitions in van der Waals quantum wells,” Na...

2018
[139]

Tuning quantum nonlocal effects in graphene plasmonics,

M. B. Lundeberg, Y. Gao, R. Asgari, C. Tan, B. Van Duppen, M. Autore, P. Alonso-González, A. Woessner, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, R. Hillenbrand, J. Hone, M. Polini, and F. H. L. Koppens, “Tuning quantum nonlocal effects in graphene plasmonics,” Science357, 187–191 (2017)

2017
[140]

Quantum Floquet engineering with an exactly solvable tight-binding chain in a cavity,

C. J. Eckhardt, G. Passetti, M. Othman, C. Karrasch, F. Cavaliere, M. A. Sentef, and D. M. Kennes, “Quantum Floquet engineering with an exactly solvable tight-binding chain in a cavity,” Commun Phys5, 122 (2022)

2022
[141]

Theory of photon condensation in a spatially varying electromagnetic field,

G. M. Andolina, F. M. D. Pellegrino, V. Giovannetti, A. H. MacDonald, and M. Polini, “Theory of photon condensation in a spatially varying electromagnetic field,” Phys. Rev. B102, 125137 (2020)

2020
[142]

Optical dressing of the electronic response of two-dimensional semiconductors in quantum and classical descriptions of cavity electrodynamics,

I. Amelio, L. Korosec, I. Carusotto, and G. Mazza, “Optical dressing of the electronic response of two-dimensional semiconductors in quantum and classical descriptions of cavity electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. B104, 235120 (2021)

2021
[143]

Dynamical mean-field study of a photon-mediated ferroelectric phase transition,

K. Lenk, J. Li, P. Werner, and M. Eckstein, “Dynamical mean-field study of a photon-mediated ferroelectric phase transition,” Phys. Rev. B106, 245124 (2022)

2022
[144]

Quantum-electrodynamical time-dependent density functional theory within Gaussian atomic basis,

J. Yang, Q. Ou, Z. Pei, H. Wang, B. Weng, Z. Shuai, K. Mullen, and Y. Shao, “Quantum-electrodynamical time-dependent density functional theory within Gaussian atomic basis,” J. Chem. Phys.155, 064107 (2021)

2021
[145]

Relativistic linear response in quantum- electrodynamical density functional theory,

L. Konecny, V. P. Kosheleva, H. Appel, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Rubio, “Relativistic linear response in quantum- electrodynamical density functional theory,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.02441 (2024)

2024 arXiv
[146]

The ferroelectric photo ground state of SrTiO3: Cavity materials engineering,

S. Latini, D. Shin, S. A. Sato, C. Schäfer, U. De Giovannini, H. Hübener, and A. Rubio, “The ferroelectric photo ground state of SrTiO3: Cavity materials engineering,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.118, e2105618118 (2021)

2021
[147]

Cavity control of excitons in two-dimensional materials,

S. Latini, E. Ronca, U. De Giovannini, H. Hübener, and A. Rubio, “Cavity control of excitons in two-dimensional materials,” Nano Lett.19, 3473–3479 (2019)

2019
[148]

The quantum Rabi model: Solution and dynamics,

Q. Xie, H. Zhong, M. T. Batchelor, and C. Lee, “The quantum Rabi model: Solution and dynamics,” J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.50, 113001 (2017)

2017
[149]

Tight-binding modelling of materials,

C. M. Goringe, D. R. Bowler, and E. Hernández, “Tight-binding modelling of materials,” Rep. Prog. Phys.60, 1447 (1997)

1997
[150]

R. M. Martin,Electronic Structure: Basic Theory and Practical Methods(Cambridge University Press, 2020)

2020
[151]

Manipulating intertwined orders in solids with quantum light,

J. Li and M. Eckstein, “Manipulating intertwined orders in solids with quantum light,” Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 217402 (2020)

2020
[152]

Electromagnetic coupling in tight-binding models for strongly correlated light and matter,

J. Li, D. Golez, G. Mazza, A. J. Millis, A. Georges, and M. Eckstein, “Electromagnetic coupling in tight-binding models for strongly correlated light and matter,” Phys. Rev. B101, 205140 (2020)

2020
[153]

QuantumtoclassicalcrossoverofFloquetengineeringincorrelated quantum systems,

M.A.Sentef,J.Li,F.Künzel,andM.Eckstein,“QuantumtoclassicalcrossoverofFloquetengineeringincorrelated quantum systems,” Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033033 (2020)

2020
[154]

Effectivetheoryoflatticeelectronsstronglycoupledtoquantumelectromagnetic fields,

J.Li,L.Schamriß,andM.Eckstein,“Effectivetheoryoflatticeelectronsstronglycoupledtoquantumelectromagnetic fields,” Phys. Rev. B105, 165121 (2022)

2022
[155]

Controlling the magnetic state of the proximate quantum spin liquid𝛼-RuCl3 with an optical cavity,

E. Viñas Boström, A. Sriram, M. Claassen, and A. Rubio, “Controlling the magnetic state of the proximate quantum spin liquid𝛼-RuCl3 with an optical cavity,” npj Comput. Mater9, 202 (2023)

2023
[156]

Quantum electron transport controlled by cavity vacuum fields,

G. Arwas and C. Ciuti, “Quantum electron transport controlled by cavity vacuum fields,” Phys. Rev. B107, 045425 (2023)

2023
[157]

Cavity light-matter entanglement through quantum fluctuations,

G. Passetti, C. J. Eckhardt, M. A. Sentef, and D. M. Kennes, “Cavity light-matter entanglement through quantum fluctuations,” Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 023601 (2023)

2023
[158]

Electronic-structure methods for materials design,

N. Marzari, A. Ferretti, and C. Wolverton, “Electronic-structure methods for materials design,” Nat. Mater.20, 736–749 (2021)

2021
[159]

R. M. Martin, L. Reining, and D. M. Ceperley,Interacting Electrons(Cambridge University Press, 2016)

2016
[160]

E.EngelandR.M.Dreizler, DensityFunctionalTheory: AnAdvancedCourse (SpringerScience&BusinessMedia, 2011)

2011
[161]

Inhomogeneous electron gas,

P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, “Inhomogeneous electron gas,” Phys. Rev.136, B864–B871 (1964)

1964
[162]

Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects,

W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, “Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects,” Phys. Rev.140, A1133–A1138 (1965)

1965
[163]

Density functional theory: Its origins, rise to prominence, and future,

R. O. Jones, “Density functional theory: Its origins, rise to prominence, and future,” Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 897–923 (2015)

2015
[164]

Challenges for density functional theory,

A. J. Cohen, P. Mori-Sánchez, and W. Yang, “Challenges for density functional theory,” Chem. Rev.112, 289–320 (2012)

2012
[165]

Status and challenges of density functional theory,

P. Verma and D. G. Truhlar, “Status and challenges of density functional theory,” Trends Chem.2, 302–318 (2020)

2020
[166]

R. M. Dreizler and E. K. U. Gross,Density Functional Theory: An Approach to the Quantum Many-Body Problem (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012)

2012
[167]

The Pseudopotential Concept,

V. Heine, “The Pseudopotential Concept,” inSolid State Physics,vol. 24 H. Ehrenreich, F. Seitz, and D. Turnbull, eds. (Academic Press, 1970), pp. 1–36

1970
[168]

The pseudopotential approximation in electronic structure theory,

P. Schwerdtfeger, “The pseudopotential approximation in electronic structure theory,” ChemPhysChem12, 3143– 3155 (2011)

2011
[169]

Projector augmented-wave method,

P. E. Blöchl, “Projector augmented-wave method,” Phys. Rev. B50, 17953–17979 (1994)

1994
[170]

From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method,

G. Kresse and D. Joubert, “From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method,” Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999)

1999
[171]

Hubbard-corrected DFT energy functionals: The LDA+U description of correlated systems,

B. Himmetoglu, A. Floris, S. de Gironcoli, and M. Cococcioni, “Hubbard-corrected DFT energy functionals: The LDA+U description of correlated systems,” Int. J. Quantum Chem.114, 14–49 (2014)

2014
[172]

Reformulation of DFT+U as a pseudohybrid hubbard density functional for accelerated materials discovery,

L. A. Agapito, S. Curtarolo, and M. Buongiorno Nardelli, “Reformulation of DFT+U as a pseudohybrid hubbard density functional for accelerated materials discovery,” Phys. Rev. X5, 011006 (2015)

2015
[173]

Self-consistentDFT+Umethodforreal-spacetime-dependent density functional theory calculations,

N.Tancogne-Dejean,M.J.T.Oliveira,andA.Rubio,“Self-consistentDFT+Umethodforreal-spacetime-dependent density functional theory calculations,” Phys. Rev. B96, 245133 (2017)

2017
[174]

Parameter-free hybridlike functional based on an extended Hubbard model: DFT+U+V,

N. Tancogne-Dejean and A. Rubio, “Parameter-free hybridlike functional based on an extended Hubbard model: DFT+U+V,” Phys. Rev. B102, 155117 (2020)

2020
[175]

Self-consistentHubbardparametersfromdensity-functionalperturbation theory in the ultrasoft and projector-augmented wave formulations,

I.Timrov,N.Marzari,andM.Cococcioni,“Self-consistentHubbardparametersfromdensity-functionalperturbation theory in the ultrasoft and projector-augmented wave formulations,” Phys. Rev. B103, 045141 (2021)

2021
[176]

Ab initio tight binding,

A. P. Horsfield and A. M. Bratkovsky, “Ab initio tight binding,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter12, R1 (2000)

2000
[177]

Maximally localized Wannier functions: Theory and applications,

N. Marzari, A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, I. Souza, and D. Vanderbilt, “Maximally localized Wannier functions: Theory and applications,” Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 1419–1475 (2012)

2012
[178]

Density- functional tight-binding: Basic concepts and applications to molecules and clusters,

F. Spiegelman, N. Tarrat, J. Cuny, L. Dontot, E. Posenitskiy, C. Martí, A. Simon, and M. Rapacioli, “Density- functional tight-binding: Basic concepts and applications to molecules and clusters,” Adv. Physics: X5, 1710252 (2020)

2020
[179]

Screened Coulomb interaction in the maximally localized Wannier basis,

T. Miyake and F. Aryasetiawan, “Screened Coulomb interaction in the maximally localized Wannier basis,” Phys. Rev. B77, 085122 (2008)

2008
[180]

Ab initio procedure for constructing effective models of correlated materials with entangled band structure,

T. Miyake, F. Aryasetiawan, and M. Imada, “Ab initio procedure for constructing effective models of correlated materials with entangled band structure,” Phys. Rev. B80, 155134 (2009)

2009
[181]

Aryasetiawan and F

F. Aryasetiawan and F. Nilsson,Downfolding Methods in Many-Electron Theory(AIP Publishing LLC, 2022)

2022
[182]

Machine learning method for tight-binding Hamiltonian parameterization from ab-initio band structure,

Z. Wang, S. Ye, H. Wang, J. He, Q. Huang, and S. Chang, “Machine learning method for tight-binding Hamiltonian parameterization from ab-initio band structure,” npj Comput. Mater7, 11 (2021)

2021
[183]

Roadmap on machine learning in electronic structure,

H. J. Kulik, T. Hammerschmidt, J. Schmidt, S. Botti, M. A. L. Marques, M. Boley, M. Scheffler, M. Todorović, P. Rinke, C. Oses, A. Smolyanyuk, S. Curtarolo, A. Tkatchenko, A. P. Bartók, S. Manzhos, M. Ihara, T. Carrington, J. Behler, O. Isayev, M. Veit, A. Grisafi, J. Nigam, M...

2022
[184]

Implementation strategies in phonopy and phono3py,

A. Togo, L. Chaput, T. Tadano, and I. Tanaka, “Implementation strategies in phonopy and phono3py,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter35, 353001 (2023)

2023
[185]

Phonons and related crystal properties from density-functional perturbation theory,

S. Baroni, S. de Gironcoli, A. Dal Corso, and P. Giannozzi, “Phonons and related crystal properties from density-functional perturbation theory,” Rev. Mod. Phys.73, 515–562 (2001)

2001
[186]

Density-functional perturbation theory for quasi-harmonic calculations,

S. Baroni, P. Giannozzi, and E. Isaev, “Density-functional perturbation theory for quasi-harmonic calculations,” Rev. Mineral. Geochem.71, 39–57 (2010)

2010
[187]

Electron-phonon interactions from first principles,

F. Giustino, “Electron-phonon interactions from first principles,” Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 015003 (2017)

2017
[188]

NonadiabaticKohnanomalyinadopedgraphenemonolayer,

M.LazzeriandF.Mauri,“NonadiabaticKohnanomalyinadopedgraphenemonolayer,”Phys.Rev.Lett. 97,266407 (2006)

2006
[189]

Breakdown of the adiabatic Born–Oppenheimer approximation in graphene,

S. Pisana, M. Lazzeri, C. Casiraghi, K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, A. C. Ferrari, and F. Mauri, “Breakdown of the adiabatic Born–Oppenheimer approximation in graphene,” Nat. Mater6, 198–201 (2007)

2007
[190]

Impact of dynamical screening on the phonon dynamics of metallic La2CuO4,

T. Bauer and C. Falter, “Impact of dynamical screening on the phonon dynamics of metallic La2CuO4,” Phys. Rev. B 80, 094525 (2009)

2009
[191]

Adiabatic and nonadiabatic phonon dispersion in a Wannier function approach,

M. Calandra, G. Profeta, and F. Mauri, “Adiabatic and nonadiabatic phonon dispersion in a Wannier function approach,” Phys. Rev. B82, 165111 (2010)

2010
[192]

Temperature dependence of the electronic structure of semiconductors and insulators,

S. Poncé, Y. Gillet, J. Laflamme Janssen, A. Marini, M. Verstraete, and X. Gonze, “Temperature dependence of the electronic structure of semiconductors and insulators,” J. Chem. Phys.143, 102813 (2015)

2015
[193]

Nonadiabatic Kohn anomaly in heavily boron-doped diamond,

F. Caruso, M. Hoesch, P. Achatz, J. Serrano, M. Krisch, E. Bustarret, and F. Giustino, “Nonadiabatic Kohn anomaly in heavily boron-doped diamond,” Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 017001 (2017)

2017
[194]

Origin of the crossover from polarons to Fermi liquids in transition metal oxides,

C. Verdi, F. Caruso, and F. Giustino, “Origin of the crossover from polarons to Fermi liquids in transition metal oxides,” Nat Commun8, 15769 (2017)

2017
[195]

Predominance of non-adiabatic effects in zero-point renormalization of the electronic band gap,

A. Miglio, V. Brousseau-Couture, E. Godbout, G. Antonius, Y.-H. Chan, S. G. Louie, M. Côté, M. Giantomassi, and X. Gonze, “Predominance of non-adiabatic effects in zero-point renormalization of the electronic band gap,” npj Comput. Mater6, 167 (2020)

2020
[196]

Nonadiabatic electron-phonon coupling and its effects on superconductivity,

S.-Q. Hu, X.-B. Liu, D.-Q. Chen, C. Lian, E.-G. Wang, and S. Meng, “Nonadiabatic electron-phonon coupling and its effects on superconductivity,” Phys. Rev. B105, 224311 (2022)

2022
[197]

Dynamicalrenormalizationofelectron-phononcouplinginconventionalsuperconductors,

N.GirottoandD.Novko,“Dynamicalrenormalizationofelectron-phononcouplinginconventionalsuperconductors,” Phys. Rev. B107, 064310 (2023)

2023
[198]

Phonon self-energy corrections: To screen, or not to screen,

J. Berges, N. Girotto, T. Wehling, N. Marzari, and S. Poncé, “Phonon self-energy corrections: To screen, or not to screen,” Phys. Rev. X13, 041009 (2023)

2023
[199]

Theself-consistent abinitio latticedynamicalmethod,

P.Souvatzis,O.Eriksson,M.I.Katsnelson,andS.P.Rudin,“Theself-consistent abinitio latticedynamicalmethod,” Comput. Mater. Sci.44, 888–894 (2009)

2009
[200]

Self-consistent phonon calculations of lattice dynamical properties in cubic SrTiO3 with first-principles anharmonic force constants,

T. Tadano and S. Tsuneyuki, “Self-consistent phonon calculations of lattice dynamical properties in cubic SrTiO3 with first-principles anharmonic force constants,” Phys. Rev. B92, 054301 (2015)

2015
[201]

Bianco, I

R. Bianco, I. Errea, L. Paulatto, M. Calandra, and F. Mauri, “Second-order structural phase transitions, free energy curvature, and temperature-dependent anharmonic phonons in the self-consistent harmonic approximation: Theory and stochastic implementation,” Phys. Rev. B96, 01...

2017
[202]

Quantum self-consistent ab-initio lattice dynamics,

A. van Roekeghem, J. Carrete, and N. Mingo, “Quantum self-consistent ab-initio lattice dynamics,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 263, 107945 (2021)

2021
[203]

Lattice thermal conductivity including phonon frequency shifts and scattering rates induced by quartic anharmonicity in cubic oxide and fluoride perovskites,

Y. Zhao, S. Zeng, G. Li, C. Lian, Z. Dai, S. Meng, and J. Ni, “Lattice thermal conductivity including phonon frequency shifts and scattering rates induced by quartic anharmonicity in cubic oxide and fluoride perovskites,” Phys. Rev. B104, 224304 (2021)

2021
[204]

Lattice dynamics of anharmonic solids from first principles,

O. Hellman, I. A. Abrikosov, and S. I. Simak, “Lattice dynamics of anharmonic solids from first principles,” Phys. Rev. B84, 180301(R) (2011)

2011
[205]

Temperature dependent effective potential method for accurate free energy calculations of solids,

O. Hellman, P. Steneteg, I. A. Abrikosov, and S. I. Simak, “Temperature dependent effective potential method for accurate free energy calculations of solids,” Phys. Rev. B87, 104111 (2013)

2013
[206]

Temperature-dependent effective third-order interatomic force constants from first principles,

O. Hellman and I. A. Abrikosov, “Temperature-dependent effective third-order interatomic force constants from first principles,” Phys. Rev. B88, 144301 (2013)

2013
[207]

Electron-phonon scattering in the presence of soft modes and electron mobility in SrTiO3 perovskite from first principles,

J.-J. Zhou, O. Hellman, and M. Bernardi, “Electron-phonon scattering in the presence of soft modes and electron mobility in SrTiO3 perovskite from first principles,” Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 226603 (2018)

2018
[208]

Temperature dependence of electron-phonon interactions in vanadium,

F. C. Yang, O. Hellman, and B. Fultz, “Temperature dependence of electron-phonon interactions in vanadium,” Phys. Rev. B101, 094305 (2020)

2020
[209]

A-TDEP: Temperature dependent effective potential for Abinit – lattice dynamic properties including anharmonicity,

F. Bottin, J. Bieder, and J. Bouchet, “A-TDEP: Temperature dependent effective potential for Abinit – lattice dynamic properties including anharmonicity,” Comput. Phys. Commun.254, 107301 (2020)

2020
[210]

Anharmonic vibrational states of solids from DFT calculations. Part I: Description of the potential energy surface,

A. Erba, J. Maul, M. Ferrabone, P. Carbonnière, M. Rérat, and R. Dovesi, “Anharmonic vibrational states of solids from DFT calculations. Part I: Description of the potential energy surface,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.15, 3755–3765 (2019)

2019
[211]

One-shot calculation of temperature-dependent optical spectra and phonon-induced band-gap renormalization,

M. Zacharias and F. Giustino, “One-shot calculation of temperature-dependent optical spectra and phonon-induced band-gap renormalization,” Phys. Rev. B94, 075125 (2016)

2016
[212]

Theory of the special displacement method for electronic structure calculations at finite temperature,

M. Zacharias and F. Giustino, “Theory of the special displacement method for electronic structure calculations at finite temperature,” Phys. Rev. Res.2, 013357 (2020)

2020
[213]

Anharmonic lattice dynamics via the special displacement method,

M. Zacharias, G. Volonakis, F. Giustino, and J. Even, “Anharmonic lattice dynamics via the special displacement method,” Phys. Rev. B108, 035155 (2023)

2023
[214]

Polaritonic chemistry with organic molecules,

J. Feist, J. Galego, and F. J. Garcia-Vidal, “Polaritonic chemistry with organic molecules,” ACS Photonics5, 205–216 (2018)

2018
[215]

Vanderbilt,Berry Phases in Electronic Structure Theory: Electric Polarization, Orbital Magnetization and Topological Insulators(Cambridge University Press, 2018)

D. Vanderbilt,Berry Phases in Electronic Structure Theory: Electric Polarization, Orbital Magnetization and Topological Insulators(Cambridge University Press, 2018)

2018
[216]

Light–matter interaction in the long-wavelength limit: No ground-state without dipole self-energy,

V. Rokaj, D. M. Welakuh, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Rubio, “Light–matter interaction in the long-wavelength limit: No ground-state without dipole self-energy,” J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.51, 034005 (2018)

2018
[217]

Relevance of the quadratic diamagnetic and self-polarization terms in cavity quantum electrodynamics,

C. Schäfer, M. Ruggenthaler, V. Rokaj, and A. Rubio, “Relevance of the quadratic diamagnetic and self-polarization terms in cavity quantum electrodynamics,” ACS Photonics7, 975–990 (2020)

2020
[218]

Shedding light on correlated electron–photon states using the exact factorization,

A. Abedi, E. Khosravi, and I. V. Tokatly, “Shedding light on correlated electron–photon states using the exact factorization,” Eur. Phys. J. B91, 194 (2018)

2018
[219]

Light-matter interactions via the exact factorization approach,

N. M. Hoffmann, H. Appel, A. Rubio, and N. T. Maitra, “Light-matter interactions via the exact factorization approach,” Eur. Phys. J. B91, 180 (2018)

2018
[220]

Capturing vacuum fluctuations and photon correlations in cavity quantum electrodynamics with multitrajectory Ehrenfest dynamics,

N. M. Hoffmann, C. Schäfer, A. Rubio, A. Kelly, and H. Appel, “Capturing vacuum fluctuations and photon correlations in cavity quantum electrodynamics with multitrajectory Ehrenfest dynamics,” Phys. Rev. A99, 063819 (2019)

2019
[221]

Cavity-correlated electron-nuclear dynamics from first principles,

J. Flick and P. Narang, “Cavity-correlated electron-nuclear dynamics from first principles,” Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 113002 (2018)

2018
[222]

Dirac’s equation and the spin-spin interactions of two electrons,

G. Breit, “Dirac’s equation and the spin-spin interactions of two electrons,” Phys. Rev.39, 616–624 (1932)

1932
[223]

Inhomogeneous relativistic electron gas,

A. K. Rajagopal, “Inhomogeneous relativistic electron gas,” J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys.11, L943 (1978)

1978
[224]

Forcebalanceapproachforadvanced approximations in density functional theories,

M.-L.M.Tchenkoue,M.Penz,I.Theophilou,M.Ruggenthaler,andA.Rubio,“Forcebalanceapproachforadvanced approximations in density functional theories,” J. Chem. Phys.151, 154107 (2019)

2019
[225]

Exchange energies with forces in density-functional theory,

N. Tancogne-Dejean, M. Penz, A. Laestadius, M. A. Csirik, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Rubio, “Exchange energies with forces in density-functional theory,” J. Chem. Phys.160, 024103 (2024)

2024
[226]

Ground-state quantum-electrodynamical density-functional theory,

M. Ruggenthaler, “Ground-state quantum-electrodynamical density-functional theory,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.01417 (2017)

2017 arXiv
[227]

The structure of the density-potential mapping. Part II: Including magnetic fields,

M. Penz, E. I. Tellgren, M. A. Csirik, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Laestadius, “The structure of the density-potential mapping. Part II: Including magnetic fields,” ACS Phys. Chem Au3, 492–511 (2023)

2023
[228]

Simple exchange-correlation energy functionals for strongly coupled light-matter systems based on the fluctuation-dissipation theorem,

J. Flick, “Simple exchange-correlation energy functionals for strongly coupled light-matter systems based on the fluctuation-dissipation theorem,” Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 143201 (2022)

2022
[229]

Quantum electrodynamical density functional theory for generalized Dicke model,

D. Novokreschenov, A. Kudlis, I. Iorsh, and I. V. Tokatly, “Quantum electrodynamical density functional theory for generalized Dicke model,” Phys. Rev. B108, 235424 (2023)

2023
[230]

Differentiability of Lieb functional in electronic density functional theory,

P. E. Lammert, “Differentiability of Lieb functional in electronic density functional theory,” Int. J. Quantum Chem. 107, 1943–1953 (2007)

2007
[231]

Key concepts in time-dependent density-functional theory,

R. Van Leeuwen, “Key concepts in time-dependent density-functional theory,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. B15, 1969–2023 (2001)

2001
[232]

Optimized effective atomic central potential,

J. D. Talman and W. F. Shadwick, “Optimized effective atomic central potential,” Phys. Rev. A14, 36–40 (1976)

1976
[233]

Ab initio optimized effective potentials for real molecules in optical cavities: Photon contributions to the molecular ground state,

J. Flick, C. Schäfer, M. Ruggenthaler, H. Appel, and A. Rubio, “Ab initio optimized effective potentials for real molecules in optical cavities: Photon contributions to the molecular ground state,” ACS Photonics5, 992–1005 (2018)

2018
[234]

Octopus, a computational framework for exploring light-driven phenomena and quantum dynamics in extended and finite systems,

N. Tancogne-Dejean, M. J. T. Oliveira, X. Andrade, H. Appel, C. H. Borca, G. Le Breton, F. Buchholz, A. Castro, S. Corni, A. A. Correa, U. De Giovannini, A. Delgado, F. G. Eich, J. Flick, G. Gil, A. Gomez, N. Helbig, H. Hübener, R. Jestädt, J. Jornet-Somoza, A. H. Larsen, I. V...

2020
[235]

Cavity-enhanced superconductivity in MgB2 from first-principles quantum electrodynamics (QEDFT),

I.-T. Lu, D. Shin, M. K. Svendsen, H. Hübener, U. De Giovannini, S. Latini, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Rubio, “Cavity-enhanced superconductivity in MgB2 from first-principles quantum electrodynamics (QEDFT),” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.121, e2415061121 (2024)

2024
[236]

Polariton chemistry: Controlling molecular dynamics with optical cavities,

R. F. Ribeiro, L. A. Martínez-Martínez, M. Du, J. Campos-Gonzalez-Angulo, and J. Yuen-Zhou, “Polariton chemistry: Controlling molecular dynamics with optical cavities,” Chem. Sci.9, 6325–6339 (2018)

2018
[237]

Molecular polaritons for controlling chemistry with quantum optics,

F. Herrera and J. Owrutsky, “Molecular polaritons for controlling chemistry with quantum optics,” J. Chem. Phys. 152, 100902 (2020)

2020
[238]

Vibration-cavity polariton chemistry and dynamics,

A. D. Dunkelberger, B. S. Simpkins, I. Vurgaftman, and J. C. Owrutsky, “Vibration-cavity polariton chemistry and dynamics,” Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.73, 429–451 (2022)

2022
[239]

Theoretical advances in polariton chemistry and molecular cavity quantum electrodynamics,

A. Mandal, M. A. Taylor, B. M. Weight, E. R. Koessler, X. Li, and P. Huo, “Theoretical advances in polariton chemistry and molecular cavity quantum electrodynamics,” Chem. Rev.123, 9786–9879 (2023)

2023
[240]

Control, modulation, and analytical descriptions of vibrational strong coupling,

B. S. Simpkins, A. D. Dunkelberger, and I. Vurgaftman, “Control, modulation, and analytical descriptions of vibrational strong coupling,” Chem. Rev.123, 5020–5048 (2023)

2023
[241]

Strong coupling phenomena in quantum microcavity structures,

M. S. Skolnick, T. A. Fisher, and D. M. Whittaker, “Strong coupling phenomena in quantum microcavity structures,” Semicond. Sci. Technol.13, 645 (1998)

1998
[242]

Optical microcavities,

K. J. Vahala, “Optical microcavities,” Nature424, 839–846 (2003)

2003
[243]

Plasmonic cavity coupling,

J. T. Hugall, A. Singh, and N. F. van Hulst, “Plasmonic cavity coupling,” ACS Photonics5, 43–53 (2018)

2018
[244]

Vacuum Rabi splitting in a plasmonic cavity at the single quantum emitter limit,

K. Santhosh, O. Bitton, L. Chuntonov, and G. Haran, “Vacuum Rabi splitting in a plasmonic cavity at the single quantum emitter limit,” Nat Commun7, ncomms11823 (2016)

2016
[245]

Single-molecule strong coupling at room temperature in plasmonic nanocavities,

R. Chikkaraddy, B. de Nĳs, F. Benz, S. J. Barrow, O. A. Scherman, E. Rosta, A. Demetriadou, P. Fox, O. Hess, and J. J. Baumberg, “Single-molecule strong coupling at room temperature in plasmonic nanocavities,” Nature535, 127–130 (2016)

2016
[246]

Single-molecule optomechanics in “picocavities

F. Benz, M. K. Schmidt, A. Dreismann, R. Chikkaraddy, Y. Zhang, A. Demetriadou, C. Carnegie, H. Ohadi, B. de Nĳs, R. Esteban, J. Aizpurua, and J. J. Baumberg, “Single-molecule optomechanics in “picocavities”,” Science354, 726–729 (2016)

2016
[247]

Coherent and incoherent laser control of photochemical reactions,

M. Shapiro and P. Brumer, “Coherent and incoherent laser control of photochemical reactions,” Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 13, 187–229 (1994)

1994
[248]

Experimental coherent laser control of physicochemical processes,

M. Dantus and V. V. Lozovoy, “Experimental coherent laser control of physicochemical processes,” Chem. Rev. 104, 1813–1860 (2004)

2004
[249]

A perspective on ab initio modeling of polaritonic chemistry: The role of non-equilibrium effects and quantum collectivity,

D. Sidler, M. Ruggenthaler, C. Schäfer, E. Ronca, and A. Rubio, “A perspective on ab initio modeling of polaritonic chemistry: The role of non-equilibrium effects and quantum collectivity,” J. Chem. Phys.156, 230901 (2022)

2022
[250]

Swinging between shine and shadow: Theoretical advances on thermally activated vibropolaritonic chemistry,

J. A. Campos-Gonzalez-Angulo, Y. R. Poh, M. Du, and J. Yuen-Zhou, “Swinging between shine and shadow: Theoretical advances on thermally activated vibropolaritonic chemistry,” J. Chem. Phys.158, 230901 (2023)

2023
[251]

The connection of polaritonic chemistry with the physics of a spin glass,

D. Sidler, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Rubio, “The connection of polaritonic chemistry with the physics of a spin glass,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.08986 (2024)

2024 arXiv
[252]

Mathematical theory of nonrelativistic matter and radiation,

V. Bach, J. Fröhlich, and I. M. Sigal, “Mathematical theory of nonrelativistic matter and radiation,” Lett Math Phys 34, 183–201 (1995)

1995
[253]

Stability of ultraviolet-cutoff quantum electrodynamics with non- relativistic matter,

C. Fefferman, J. Fröhlich, and G. M. Graf, “Stability of ultraviolet-cutoff quantum electrodynamics with non- relativistic matter,” Comm Math Phys190, 309–330 (1997)

1997
[254]

Self-adjointness of the Pauli-Fierz hamiltonian for arbitrary values of coupling constants,

F. Hiroshima, “Self-adjointness of the Pauli-Fierz hamiltonian for arbitrary values of coupling constants,” Ann. Henri Poincare3, 171–201 (2002)

2002
[255]

Ground state degeneracy of the Pauli-Fierz Hamiltonian with spin,

F. Hiroshima and H. Spohn, “Ground state degeneracy of the Pauli-Fierz Hamiltonian with spin,” arXiv preprint arXiv:math-ph/0205018 (2002)

2002 arXiv
[256]

Lowest energy states in nonrelativistic QED: Atoms and ions in motion,

M. Loss, T. Miyao, and H. Spohn, “Lowest energy states in nonrelativistic QED: Atoms and ions in motion,” J. Funct. Anal.243, 353–393 (2007)

2007
[257]

Pauli–Fierz model with Kato-class potentials and exponential decays,

T. Hidaka and F. Hiroshima, “Pauli–Fierz model with Kato-class potentials and exponential decays,” Rev. Math. Phys.22, 1181–1208 (2010)

2010
[258]

Self-adjointness of the semi-relativistic Pauli–Fierz Hamiltonian,

T. Hidaka and F. Hiroshima, “Self-adjointness of the semi-relativistic Pauli–Fierz Hamiltonian,” Rev. Math. Phys. 27, 1550015 (2015)

2015
[259]

Spectral analysis of the semi-relativistic Pauli–Fierz hamiltonian,

T. Miyao and H. Spohn, “Spectral analysis of the semi-relativistic Pauli–Fierz hamiltonian,” J. Funct. Anal.256, 2123–2156 (2009)

2009
[260]

F. H. M. Faisal,Theory of Multiphoton Processes(Springer US, 2013)

2013
[261]

Cavity-Born Oppenheimer Approximation for Molecules and Materials via Electric Field Response,

J. Bonini, I. Ahmadabadi, and J. Flick, “Cavity-Born Oppenheimer Approximation for Molecules and Materials via Electric Field Response,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.14613 (2024)

2024
[262]

Chemistry in quantum cavities: Exact results, the impact of thermal velocities, and modified dissociation,

D. Sidler, M. Ruggenthaler, H. Appel, and A. Rubio, “Chemistry in quantum cavities: Exact results, the impact of thermal velocities, and modified dissociation,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett.11, 7525–7530 (2020)

2020
[263]

Numericallyexactsolutionforarealpolaritonicsystemundervibrational strong coupling in thermodynamic equilibrium: Loss of light–matter entanglement and enhanced fluctuations,

D.Sidler,M.Ruggenthaler,andA.Rubio,“Numericallyexactsolutionforarealpolaritonicsystemundervibrational strong coupling in thermodynamic equilibrium: Loss of light–matter entanglement and enhanced fluctuations,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.19, 8801–8814 (2023)

2023
[264]

Kohn–Sham approach to quantum electrodynamical density- functional theory: Exact time-dependent effective potentials in real space,

J. Flick, M. Ruggenthaler, H. Appel, and A. Rubio, “Kohn–Sham approach to quantum electrodynamical density- functional theory: Exact time-dependent effective potentials in real space,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.112, 15285–15290 (2015)

2015
[265]

Mixed quantum-classical electrodynamics: Understanding spontaneous decay and zero-point energy,

T. E. Li, A. Nitzan, M. Sukharev, T. Martinez, H.-T. Chen, and J. E. Subotnik, “Mixed quantum-classical electrodynamics: Understanding spontaneous decay and zero-point energy,” Phys. Rev. A97, 032105 (2018)

2018
[266]

Investigating new reactivities enabled by polariton photochemistry,

A. Mandal and P. Huo, “Investigating new reactivities enabled by polariton photochemistry,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10, 5519–5529 (2019)

2019
[267]

Polariton-mediated electron transfer via cavity quantum electrodynamics,

A. Mandal, T. D. Krauss, and P. Huo, “Polariton-mediated electron transfer via cavity quantum electrodynamics,” J. Phys. Chem. B124, 6321–6340 (2020)

2020
[268]

Quantum simulations of vibrational strong coupling via path integrals,

T. E. Li, A. Nitzan, S. Hammes-Schiffer, and J. E. Subotnik, “Quantum simulations of vibrational strong coupling via path integrals,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett.13, 3890–3895 (2022)

2022
[269]

Quantum dynamical effects of vibrational strong coupling in chemical reactivity,

L. P. Lindoy, A. Mandal, and D. R. Reichman, “Quantum dynamical effects of vibrational strong coupling in chemical reactivity,” Nat Commun14, 2733 (2023)

2023
[270]

Extracting kinetic information from short-time trajectories: Relaxation and disorder of lossy cavity polaritons,

A. Wu, J. Cerrillo, and J. Cao, “Extracting kinetic information from short-time trajectories: Relaxation and disorder of lossy cavity polaritons,” Nanophotonics13, 2575–2590 (2024)

2024
[271]

Ehrenfest+R dynamics. I. A mixed quan- tum–classical electrodynamics simulation of spontaneous emission,

H.-T. Chen, T. E. Li, M. Sukharev, A. Nitzan, and J. E. Subotnik, “Ehrenfest+R dynamics. I. A mixed quan- tum–classical electrodynamics simulation of spontaneous emission,” J. Chem. Phys.150, 044102 (2019)

2019
[272]

Photochemistry in the strong coupling regime: A trajectory surface hopping scheme,

J. Fregoni, S. Corni, M. Persico, and G. Granucci, “Photochemistry in the strong coupling regime: A trajectory surface hopping scheme,” J. Comput. Chem.41, 2033–2044 (2020)

2020
[273]

Role of cavity losses on nonadiabatic couplings and dynamics in polaritonic chemistry,

P. Antoniou, F. Suchanek, J. F. Varner, and J. J. I. Foley, “Role of cavity losses on nonadiabatic couplings and dynamics in polaritonic chemistry,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett.11, 9063–9069 (2020)

2020
[274]

Strong coupling between localized surface plasmons and molecules by coupled cluster theory,

J. Fregoni, T. S. Haugland, S. Pipolo, T. Giovannini, H. Koch, and S. Corni, “Strong coupling between localized surface plasmons and molecules by coupled cluster theory,” Nano Lett.21, 6664–6670 (2021)

2021
[275]

Reduced density-matrix approach to strong matter-photon interaction,

F. Buchholz, I. Theophilou, S. E. B. Nielsen, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Rubio, “Reduced density-matrix approach to strong matter-photon interaction,” ACS Photonics6, 2694–2711 (2019)

2019
[276]

Dressed-orbital approach to cavity quantum electrodynamics and beyond,

S. E. B. Nielsen, C. Schäfer, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Rubio, “Dressed-orbital approach to cavity quantum electrodynamics and beyond,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.00388 (2019)

2019 arXiv
[277]

Light–matter hybrid-orbital-based first-principles methods: The influence of polariton statistics,

F. Buchholz, I. Theophilou, K. J. H. Giesbertz, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Rubio, “Light–matter hybrid-orbital-based first-principles methods: The influence of polariton statistics,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.16, 5601–5620 (2020)

2020
[278]

Ab initio methods for polariton chemistry,

J. J. Foley, IV, J. F. McTague, and A. E. DePrince, III, “Ab initio methods for polariton chemistry,” Chem. Phys. Rev.4, 041301 (2023)

2023
[279]

Strong exciton–photon coupling in an organic semiconductor microcavity,

D. G. Lidzey, D. D. C. Bradley, M. S. Skolnick, T. Virgili, S. Walker, and D. M. Whittaker, “Strong exciton–photon coupling in an organic semiconductor microcavity,” Nature395, 53–55 (1998)

1998
[280]

StrongOpticalCouplinginOrganicSemiconductorMicrocavities,

D.G.Lidzey,“StrongOpticalCouplinginOrganicSemiconductorMicrocavities,”in ThinFilmsandNanostructures, vol. 31 ofElectronic Excitations in Organic Nanostructures(Academic Press, 2003), pp. 355–402

2003
[281]

Solid state cavity QED: Strong coupling in organic thin films,

J. R. Tischler, M. Scott Bradley, Q. Zhang, T. Atay, A. Nurmikko, and V. Bulović, “Solid state cavity QED: Strong coupling in organic thin films,” Org. Electron.8, 94–113 (2007)

2007
[282]

Modifyingchemicallandscapesbycoupling to vacuum fields,

J.A.Hutchison,T.Schwartz,C.Genet,E.Devaux,andT.W.Ebbesen,“Modifyingchemicallandscapesbycoupling to vacuum fields,” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.51, 1592–1596 (2012)

2012
[283]

Tuning the work-function via strong coupling,

J. A. Hutchison, A. Liscio, T. Schwartz, A. Canaguier-Durand, C. Genet, V. Palermo, P. Samorì, and T. W. Ebbesen, “Tuning the work-function via strong coupling,” Adv. Mater.25, 2481–2485 (2013)

2013
[284]

Selective manipulation of electronically excited states through strong light–matter interactions,

K. Stranius, M. Hertzog, and K. Börjesson, “Selective manipulation of electronically excited states through strong light–matter interactions,” Nat Commun9, 2273 (2018)

2018
[285]

Suppression of photo-oxidation of organic chromophores by strong coupling to plasmonic nanoantennas,

B. Munkhbat, M. Wersäll, D. G. Baranov, T. J. Antosiewicz, and T. Shegai, “Suppression of photo-oxidation of organic chromophores by strong coupling to plasmonic nanoantennas,” Sci. Adv.4, eaas9552 (2018)

2018
[286]

Effect of strong coupling on photodegradation of the semiconducting polymer P3HT,

V. N. Peters, M. O. Faruk, J. Asane, R. Alexander, D. A. Peters, S. Prayakarao, S. Rout, and M. A. Noginov, “Effect of strong coupling on photodegradation of the semiconducting polymer P3HT,” Optica6, 318–325 (2019)

2019
[287]

Non-radiative energy transfer mediated by hybrid light-matter states,

X. Zhong, T. Chervy, S. Wang, J. George, A. Thomas, J. A. Hutchison, E. Devaux, C. Genet, and T. W. Ebbesen, “Non-radiative energy transfer mediated by hybrid light-matter states,” Angew. Chem.128, 6310–6314 (2016)

2016
[288]

Modified relaxation dynamics and coherent energy exchange in coupled vibration-cavity polaritons,

A. D. Dunkelberger, B. T. Spann, K. P. Fears, B. S. Simpkins, and J. C. Owrutsky, “Modified relaxation dynamics and coherent energy exchange in coupled vibration-cavity polaritons,” Nat Commun7, 13504 (2016)

2016
[289]

Tilting a ground-state reactivity landscape by vibrational strong coupling,

A. Thomas, L. Lethuillier-Karl, K. Nagarajan, R. M. A. Vergauwe, J. George, T. Chervy, A. Shalabney, E. Devaux, C. Genet, J. Moran, and T. W. Ebbesen, “Tilting a ground-state reactivity landscape by vibrational strong coupling,” Science 363, 615–619 (2019)

2019
[290]

Modification of enzyme activity by vibrational strong coupling of water,

R.M.A.Vergauwe,A.Thomas,K.Nagarajan,A.Shalabney,J.George,T.Chervy,M.Seidel,E.Devaux,V.Torbeev, and T. W. Ebbesen, “Modification of enzyme activity by vibrational strong coupling of water,” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 15324–15328 (2019)

2019
[291]

Modulation of prins cyclization by vibrational strong coupling,

K. Hirai, R. Takeda, J. A. Hutchison, and H. Uji-i, “Modulation of prins cyclization by vibrational strong coupling,” Angew. Chem.132, 5370–5373 (2020)

2020
[292]

Intermolecularvibrational energy transfer enabled by microcavity strong light–matter coupling,

B.Xiang,R.F.Ribeiro,M.Du,L.Chen,Z.Yang,J.Wang,J.Yuen-Zhou,andW.Xiong,“Intermolecularvibrational energy transfer enabled by microcavity strong light–matter coupling,” Science368, 665–667 (2020)

2020
[293]

Ontheroleofsymmetryinvibrationalstrongcoupling: Thecaseofcharge-transfercomplexation,

Y. Pang, A. Thomas, K. Nagarajan, R. M. A. Vergauwe, K. Joseph, B. Patrahau, K. Wang, C. Genet, and T. W. Ebbesen,“Ontheroleofsymmetryinvibrationalstrongcoupling: Thecaseofcharge-transfercomplexation,”Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.59, 10436–10440 (2020)

2020
[294]

Modification of ground-state chemical reactivity via light–matter coherence in infrared cavities,

W. Ahn, J. F. Triana, F. Recabal, F. Herrera, and B. S. Simpkins, “Modification of ground-state chemical reactivity via light–matter coherence in infrared cavities,” Science380, 1165–1168 (2023)

2023
[295]

Selective crystallization via vibrational strong coupling,

K. Hirai, H. Ishikawa, T. Chervy, J. A. Hutchison, and H. Uji-i, “Selective crystallization via vibrational strong coupling,” Chem. Sci.12, 11986–11994 (2021)

2021
[296]

Reproducibility of cavity-enhanced chemical reaction rates in the vibrational strong coupling regime,

M. V. Imperatore, J. B. Asbury, and N. C. Giebink, “Reproducibility of cavity-enhanced chemical reaction rates in the vibrational strong coupling regime,” J. Chem. Phys.154, 191103 (2021)

2021
[297]

Negligible rate enhancement from reported cooperative vibrational strong coupling catalysis,

G. D. Wiesehan and W. Xiong, “Negligible rate enhancement from reported cooperative vibrational strong coupling catalysis,” J. Chem. Phys.155, 241103 (2021)

2021
[298]

Unraveling a cavity- induced molecular polarization mechanism from collective vibrational strong coupling,

D. Sidler, T. Schnappinger, A. Obzhirov, M. Ruggenthaler, M. Kowalewski, and A. Rubio, “Unraveling a cavity- induced molecular polarization mechanism from collective vibrational strong coupling,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett.15, 5208–5214 (2024)

2024
[299]

Non-perturbative mass renormalization effects in non-relativistic quantum electrodynamics,

D. M. Welakuh, V. Rokaj, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Rubio, “Non-perturbative mass renormalization effects in non-relativistic quantum electrodynamics,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.03213 (2023)

2023 arXiv
[300]

Newmethodforhigh-accuracydeterminationofthefine-structureconstant based on quantized Hall resistance,

K.v.Klitzing,G.Dorda,andM.Pepper,“Newmethodforhigh-accuracydeterminationofthefine-structureconstant based on quantized Hall resistance,” Phys. Rev. Lett.45, 494–497 (1980)

1980

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [105]

Theory of quantum light-matter interaction in cavities: Extended systems and the long wavelength approximation,

M. K. Svendsen, M. Ruggenthaler, H. Hübener, C. Schäfer, M. Eckstein, A. Rubio, and S. Latini, “Theory of quantum light-matter interaction in cavities: Extended systems and the long wavelength approximation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.17374 (2023)

arXiv 2023

[2] [1]

Recent progress of high-entropy materials for energy storage and conversion,

A. Amiri and R. Shahbazian-Yassar, “Recent progress of high-entropy materials for energy storage and conversion,” J. Mater. Chem. A9, 782–823 (2021)

2021

[3] [2]

Materialsforfuturenuclearenergysystems,

G.S.Was,D.Petti,S.Ukai,andS.Zinkle,“Materialsforfuturenuclearenergysystems,”J.Nucl.Mater. 527,151837 (2019)

2019

[4] [3]

2D materials for quantum information science,

X. Liu and M. C. Hersam, “2D materials for quantum information science,” Nat Rev Mater4, 669–684 (2019)

2019

[5] [4]

Materials challenges and opportunities for quantum computing hardware,

N. P. de Leon, K. M. Itoh, D. Kim, K. K. Mehta, T. E. Northup, H. Paik, B. S. Palmer, N. Samarth, S. Sangtawesin, and D. W. Steuerman, “Materials challenges and opportunities for quantum computing hardware,” Science372, eabb2823 (2021)

2021

[6] [5]

Material platforms for spin-based photonic quantum technologies,

M. Atatüre, D. Englund, N. Vamivakas, S.-Y. Lee, and J. Wrachtrup, “Material platforms for spin-based photonic quantum technologies,” Nat Rev Mater3, 38–51 (2018)

2018

[7] [6]

Advantages and challenges of novel materials for future space applications,

L. Pernigoni and A. M. Grande, “Advantages and challenges of novel materials for future space applications,” Front. Space Technol.4, 1253419 (2023)

2023

[8] [7]

Advanced materials for next-generation spacecraft,

I. Levchenko, K. Bazaka, T. Belmonte, M. Keidar, and S. Xu, “Advanced materials for next-generation spacecraft,” Adv. Mater.30, 1802201 (2018)

2018