REVIEW 1 cited by
Providing Machine Learning Potentials with High Quality Uncertainty Estimates
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Computational chemistry has come a long way over the course of several decades, enabling subatomic level calculations particularly with the development of Density Functional Theory (DFT). Recently, machine-learned potentials (MLP) have provided a way to overcome the prevalent time and length scale constraints in such calculations. Unfortunately, these models utilise complex and high dimensional representations, making it challenging for users to intuit performance from chemical structure, which has motivated the development of methods for uncertainty quantification. One of the most common methods is to introduce an ensemble of models and employ an averaging approach to determine the uncertainty. In this work, we introduced Bayesian Neural Networks (BNNs) for uncertainty aware energy evaluation as a more principled and resource efficient method to achieve this goal. The richness of our uncertainty quantification enables a new type of hybrid workflow where calculations can be offloaded to a MLP in a principled manner.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Bayesian Neural Networks versus deep ensembles for uncertainty quantification in machine learning interatomic potentials
Deep ensembles outperform variational Bayesian neural networks in accuracy and uncertainty calibration on machine-learned TiO2 potentials, with some low-data exceptions when Bayesian methods are better calibrated.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.