pith. sign in

arxiv: 1603.05546 · v1 · pith:UAAH66ZNnew · submitted 2016-03-17 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex· hep-lat· nucl-th

General considerations on the nature of Z_b(10610) and Z_b(10650) from their pole positions

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-exhep-latnucl-th
keywords compositenessoverlinenaturepolepositionsresonanceresonancesscattering
0
0 comments X p. Extension
pith:UAAH66ZN Add to your LaTeX paper What is a Pith Number?
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{UAAH66ZN}

Prints a linked pith:UAAH66ZN badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

read the original abstract

The nature of the bottomonium-like states $Z_b(10610)$ and $Z_b(10650)$ is studied by calculating the $B^{(*)}\overline B^{*}$ compositeness ($X$) in those resonances. We first consider uncoupled isovector $S$-wave scattering of $B^{(*)}\overline B^{*}$ within the framework of effective-range expansion (ERE). Expressions for the scattering length ($a$) and effective range ($r$) are derived exclusively in terms of the masses and widths of the two $Z_b$ states. We then develop compositeness within ERE for the resonance case and deduce the expression $X=1/\sqrt{2r/a-1}$, which is then applied to the systems of interest. Finally, the actual compositeness parameters are calculated in terms of resonance pole positions and their experimental branching ratios into $B^{(*)}\overline{B}^*$ by using the method of Ref.[1]. We find the values $X=0.66\pm 0.11$ and $0.51\pm 0.10$ for the $Z_b(10610)$ and $Z_b(10650)$, respectively. We also compare the ERE with Breit-Wigner and Flatt\'e parameterizations to discuss the applicability of the last two ones for near-threshold resonances with explicit examples.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.