Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Review of the Gumbel-max Trick and its Extensions for Discrete Stochasticity in Machine Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.01515 v2 pith:UAD42CDF submitted 2021-10-04 cs.LG stat.ML

A Review of the Gumbel-max Trick and its Extensions for Discrete Stochasticity in Machine Learning

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords trickextensionsgumbel-maxlearningmachinestructuredalgorithmalgorithms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The Gumbel-max trick is a method to draw a sample from a categorical distribution, given by its unnormalized (log-)probabilities. Over the past years, the machine learning community has proposed several extensions of this trick to facilitate, e.g., drawing multiple samples, sampling from structured domains, or gradient estimation for error backpropagation in neural network optimization. The goal of this survey article is to present background about the Gumbel-max trick, and to provide a structured overview of its extensions to ease algorithm selection. Moreover, it presents a comprehensive outline of (machine learning) literature in which Gumbel-based algorithms have been leveraged, reviews commonly-made design choices, and sketches a future perspective.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Scoring Is Not Enough: Addressing Gaps in Utility-fairness Trade-offs for Ranking

    cs.IR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Scoring functions are sub-optimal for all utility-fairness trade-offs in ranking under a generic fairness formulation, but semi-greedy post-processing can approach the performance of exhaustive post-processing.