Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Spoofing Linear Cross-Entropy Benchmarking in Shallow Quantum Circuits

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2005.02421 v1 pith:UC4H3EVI submitted 2020-05-05 quant-ph cs.CC

Spoofing Linear Cross-Entropy Benchmarking in Shallow Quantum Circuits

classification quant-ph cs.CC
keywords linearquantumcircuitcircuitsfidelitydepthdistributionoutput
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The linear cross-entropy benchmark (Linear XEB) has been used as a test for procedures simulating quantum circuits. Given a quantum circuit $C$ with $n$ inputs and outputs and purported simulator whose output is distributed according to a distribution $p$ over $\{0,1\}^n$, the linear XEB fidelity of the simulator is $\mathcal{F}_{C}(p) = 2^n \mathbb{E}_{x \sim p} q_C(x) -1$ where $q_C(x)$ is the probability that $x$ is output from the distribution $C|0^n\rangle$. A trivial simulator (e.g., the uniform distribution) satisfies $\mathcal{F}_C(p)=0$, while Google's noisy quantum simulation of a 53 qubit circuit $C$ achieved a fidelity value of $(2.24\pm0.21)\times10^{-3}$ (Arute et. al., Nature'19). In this work we give a classical randomized algorithm that for a given circuit $C$ of depth $d$ with Haar random 2-qubit gates achieves in expectation a fidelity value of $\Omega(\tfrac{n}{L} \cdot 15^{-d})$ in running time $\textsf{poly}(n,2^L)$. Here $L$ is the size of the \emph{light cone} of $C$: the maximum number of input bits that each output bit depends on. In particular, we obtain a polynomial-time algorithm that achieves large fidelity of $\omega(1)$ for depth $O(\sqrt{\log n})$ two-dimensional circuits. To our knowledge, this is the first such result for two dimensional circuits of super-constant depth. Our results can be considered as an evidence that fooling the linear XEB test might be easier than achieving a full simulation of the quantum circuit.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Anticoncentrated $n$-bit distribution from $\log(n)$ qubits

    quant-ph 2025-11 conditional novelty 8.0

    n-bit anticoncentrated distributions can be generated from O(log n) qubits via a holographic protocol of interleaved random unitaries and mid-circuit measurements.

  2. Weak Poincar\'e Inequalities via Approximate Stochastic Localization: Application to Sampling the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick Model

    math.PR 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    Approximate stochastic localization plus conductance transfers yield a weak Poincaré inequality for the SK model at β < 1/2, enabling efficient Glauber sampling from a warm start.

  3. General framework for anticoncentration and linear cross-entropy benchmarking in photonic quantum advantage experiments

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A representation-theoretic framework computes LXEB scores and proves anticoncentration for Fock-state Boson Sampling in the saturated regime using irrep decompositions of bosonic spaces.

  4. Polynomial Resource Classification of Quantum Circuit Familes via Classical Shadows

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Z-only measurements classify small IQP, Clifford, and Clifford+T circuits with up to 0.91 accuracy and outperform classical shadows, but all four strategies drop to chance level above 12 qubits with quadratic shots.