REVIEW 1 cited by
Does human-robot trust need reciprocity?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Trust is one of the hallmarks of human-human and human-robot interaction. Extensive evidence has shown that trust among humans requires reciprocity. Conversely, research in human-robot interaction (HRI) has mostly relied on a unidirectional view of trust that focuses on robots' reliability and performance. The current paper argues that reciprocity may also play a key role in the emergence of mutual trust and successful collaboration between humans and robots. We will gather and discuss works that reveal a reciprocal dimension in human-robot trust, paving the way to a bidirectional and dynamic view of trust in HRI.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Trustworthiness in Stochastic Systems: Towards Opening the Black Box
The authors define trust-relevant stochasticity as variability at or above a user's valued level of description, and propose latent value modeling to assess user-system value alignment.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.