Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Curriculum for Crowd Counting -- Is it Worthy?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.07586 v1 pith:UEUY5WSY submitted 2024-01-15 cs.CV cs.AI

classification cs.CVcs.AI
keywords learningcurriculumcrowdmodelscountingdeepdifferentexperiments
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advances in deep learning techniques have achieved remarkable performance in several computer vision problems. A notably intuitive technique called Curriculum Learning (CL) has been introduced recently for training deep learning models. Surprisingly, curriculum learning achieves significantly improved results in some tasks but marginal or no improvement in others. Hence, there is still a debate about its adoption as a standard method to train supervised learning models. In this work, we investigate the impact of curriculum learning in crowd counting using the density estimation method. We performed detailed investigations by conducting 112 experiments using six different CL settings using eight different crowd models. Our experiments show that curriculum learning improves the model learning performance and shortens the convergence time.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools