REVIEW 1 cited by
Quantifying Suspiciousness Within Correlated Data Sets
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Quantifying Suspiciousness Within Correlated Data Sets
read the original abstract
We propose a principled Bayesian method for quantifying tension between correlated datasets with wide uninformative parameter priors. This is achieved by extending the Suspiciousness statistic, which is insensitive to priors. Our method uses global summary statistics, and as such it can be used as a diagnostic for internal consistency. We show how our approach can be combined with methods that use parameter space and data space to identify the existing internal discrepancies. As an example, we use it to test the internal consistency of the KiDS-450 data in 4 photometric redshift bins, and to recover controlled internal discrepancies in simulated KiDS data. We propose this as a diagnostic of internal consistency for present and future cosmological surveys, and as a tension metric for data sets that have non-negligible correlation, such as LSST and Euclid.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
unimpeded: A Public Grid of Nested Sampling Chains for Cosmological Model Comparison and Tension Analysis
A public library of pre-computed nested-sampling chains for 8 cosmological models and a large dataset grid enables fast Bayesian model comparison; combined analyses most often prefer ΛCDM, with DES–Planck and SH0ES–Pl...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.