Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 4 cited by

Self-consistent scenario for jet and stellar explosion in collapsar: General relativistic magnetohydrodynamics simulation with dynamo

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A collapsar can build the magnetic field for its own gamma-ray-burst jet, starting from a weak seed.

desk verdict A credible but not yet converged collapsar engine: the dynamo closure does real work, and the jet/no-jet split across resolution keeps the headline result conditional. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.02077 v1 pith:UFTV7I7U submitted 2025-02-04 astro-ph.HE gr-qc

Masaru Shibata , Sho Fujibayashi , Shinya Wanajo , Kunihito Ioka , Alan Tsz-Lok Lam , Yuichiro Sekiguchi This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HEgr-qc PACS 95.30.Qd97.60.Bw98.70.Rz
keywords collapsarlonggamma-rayburstsbroad-linedtypeIcsupernovaegeneralrelativisticmagnetohydrodynamicsmean-fielddynamoBlandford-Znajekmechanismnucleosynthesisblackholeaccretion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Long gamma-ray bursts and the broad-lined type Ic supernovae that accompany them are usually modeled by assuming a spinning black hole already threaded by a very strong poloidal magnetic field. This paper argues that no such assumption is needed. In a fully general-relativistic simulation of a collapsar—a rotating massive star whose core collapses directly to a black hole surrounded by a torus—a mean-field dynamo (a prescription for how turbulence regenerates magnetic fields) amplifies a weak toroidal seed field, builds a poloidal field through the black hole, and launches a Blandford-Znajek jet, a jet powered by extraction of the black hole's spin energy through magnetic fields, with the luminosity of typical long GRBs, while the same torus drives a stellar explosion. The simulated explosion energies, ejecta masses, and $^{56}$Ni masses fall on the correlations measured for broad-lined type Ic supernovae, so the strong field that powers the jet is generated by the disk itself rather than inserted by hand.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the phenomenological mean-field $\alpha\Omega$ dynamo, inserted into general-relativistic resistive magnetohydrodynamics as a source term with amplitude $\alpha_d$ and conductivity $\sigma_c$, suppressed by a factor $1-\exp(-\rho/\rho_{\rm cut})$ in low-density regions. It stands in for the turbulent dynamo that a fully resolved three-dimensional magnetorotational-instability simulation would produce, sustaining both field amplification and the turbulent angular-momentum transport that makes the torus 'viscous.' The second essential element is the jet-launch criterion $B^2/8\pi > \rho_{\rm inf}v_{\rm inf}^2$: once magnetic pressure in the polar region beats the ram pressure of infalling matter, a magnetosphere inflates and the Blandford-Znajek mechanism can operate. Because the dynamo reverses field polarity quasi-periodically, reconnection in the magnetosphere limits the extracted energy to roughly $10^{51}$ erg, giving the jet a natural lifetime of order 100 s.

What would settle it

A three-dimensional general-relativistic magnetohydrodynamics simulation of the same progenitor starting from the same weak toroidal seed, with resolution high enough to resolve the magnetorotational instability, would settle the claim: if no $\sim10^{14}$ G poloidal field threads the black hole and no jet appears within about 30 seconds, the dynamo closure is carrying the result.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a collapsar with only a weak toroidal magnetic seed self-consistently produces both a long-GRB jet and a supernova explosion. Once a massive torus forms, the dynamo amplifies the field toward equipartition, giving $\sim10^{14}$ G near the black hole. At early times the ram pressure of infalling matter swallows magnetic flux into the horizon before a magnetosphere can grow; only when the ram pressure drops does the condition $B^2/8\pi > \rho_{\rm inf}v_{\rm inf}^2$ hold. Then a horizon-threading poloidal field is established, the Blandford-Znajek mechanism extracts black-hole spin energy as a Poynting-flux jet with $L_{BZ}\sim10^{50}$–$10^{51}$ erg/s, and the turbulent torus plus magnetocentrifugal effects drive an explosion with $E_{\rm exp}\sim10^{51}$–$10^{52}$ erg, $M_{\rm ej}\sim1.6$–$4.9\,M_\odot$, and $M_{\rm Ni}\sim0.1$–$1.1\,M_\odot$, matching observed broad-lined type Ic supernovae. The paper also finds that jet activity is required for even a weak $r$-process and that large amounts of zinc are synthesized.

Load-bearing premise

The scenario stands or falls on the assumption that the hand-tuned two-dimensional dynamo term reproduces how real three-dimensional turbulence amplifies magnetic fields in the torus.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Long gamma-ray bursts do not require a pre-existing $\sim10^{14}$ G poloidal field; the torus dynamo builds the jet-launching field from a weak seed in roughly 10–20 s.
  • The same torus that feeds the jet drives the stellar explosion, so the $E_{\rm exp}$–$M_{\rm ej}$–$M_{\rm Ni}$ correlations of GRB-associated broad-lined type Ic supernovae emerge from a single calculation with no fine-tuning.
  • Jet activity is the switch for trans-iron nucleosynthesis: models with jets make modest $r$-process nuclei and sizable zinc masses, while non-jet models make essentially none.
  • The jet energy is capped at the order of $10^{51}$ erg because dynamo polarity flips and reconnection erode the magnetosphere, providing a natural timescale of order 100 s for the jet lifetime.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: if the dynamo closure is approximately faithful, the observed scatter in $E_{\rm exp}$ and $M_{\rm ej}$ among type Ic-BL supernovae could be driven as much by dynamo activity as by progenitor angular momentum; varying $\alpha_d$ and $\sigma_c$ in the simulation already produces a spread similar to the observations.
  • Inference: the paper's negligible lanthanide and actinide yields imply that red kilonova-like transients associated with long GRBs, such as the reported GRB 230307A event, more likely come from neutron-star mergers; future events with tellurium features can test this.
  • Inference: if the local magnetosphere with $|\phi_{\rm AH}|\sim5$ suffices for jet launch, the higher global magnetically arrested disk (MAD) threshold often used in simulations may overstate the field required for GRB jets; this can be checked with higher-resolution runs.
  • Inference: because the dynamo's sign, magnitude, and spatial structure are chosen rather than derived, a three-dimensional simulation resolving the magnetorotational instability is the decisive check, and until then the quantitative Poynting luminosity carries a factor-of-a-few uncertainty.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports fully general-relativistic, axisymmetric, neutrino-radiation resistive MHD simulations of a collapsar, with a phenomenological mean-field alpha-Omega dynamo term added to mimic MRI-driven turbulence. Starting from a spinning 16 solar-mass black hole and infalling stellar matter with a weak toroidal seed magnetic field, the simulations follow 30-50 s of evolution. In several models a turbulent torus develops, poloidal field threading the black hole builds up, and a Blandford-Znajek jet plus a stellar explosion result, with explosion energies 1e51-1e52 erg, ejecta masses 1.6-4.9 solar masses, and 56Ni masses 0.1-1.1 solar masses, in rough agreement with observed broad-lined type Ic supernovae. The authors also report large Zn production and weak r-process nucleosynthesis in jet-launching models, and they explicitly state that the modeling is qualitative/semi-quantitative and that full 3D simulations are needed for quantitative conclusions.

Significance. If correct, the paper would demonstrate a self-consistent path from a weak toroidal seed field to a Blandford-Znajek jet and an Ic-BL-like explosion, removing the need to assume a pre-existing ~1e14 G poloidal field in collapsar models. This is an important step for the collapsar scenario. The paper's strengths include long-duration full-GR simulations with neutrino radiation transport, a systematic multi-model parameter study, transparent reporting of resolution dependence, and post-processing nucleosynthesis with comparisons to observed supernovae and metal-poor stellar abundances. The central mechanism, however, is conditioned on an uncalibrated mean-field dynamo closure and on resolution-dependent jet/no-jet outcomes; the paper itself acknowledges these limitations. The result should therefore be read as a plausible scenario rather than a demonstrated mechanism, and the observational agreement, while encouraging, does not independently validate the dynamo prescription.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section II, Eq. (2) and Table I] The dynamo closure is load-bearing for the central scenario, yet it is introduced phenomenologically. The coefficients alpha_d, sigma_c, and rho_cut set the growth rate, dissipation, and spatial cutoff of the dynamo, and the results in Table II vary substantially across the small parameter grid (Eexp from 1.33 to 11.6 x 10^51 erg, Mej from 1.56 to 4.90 solar masses, EBZ from 0.22 to 1.59 x 10^51 erg). Because the simulations are axisymmetric, MRI turbulence is not resolved and the closure cannot be validated internally; the references to neutron-star merger simulations (Refs. [30-33]) establish that a dynamo can operate in disks, but not that this specific alpha_d(rho) prescription with fixed positive sign and rho_cut is quantitatively faithful for a collapsar torus. Please provide a sensitivity study of the qualitative conclusions to the sign and spatial structure of alpha_d, or explicitly reframe the central claim as contingent on the closure rather than 'self-consistent'.
  2. [Section III.C and Table I] The jet/no-jet outcome is not converged for a key model. Model B12.3.8l launches a jet at Delta x = 360 m, while the higher-resolution run B12.3.8l-H at Delta x = 300 m does not launch a jet even though the explosion energy is similar (Table II). The authors state that convergence is 'fair' after turbulence develops and attribute the difference to stochastic polarity of the horizon flux (Sec. III.A), but a binary flip from jet to no-jet with resolution means that the central claim 'a jet is launched' is not established for this model. The paper should show that at least one jet-launching model is robust at higher resolution, or identify a resolution-converged diagnostic (e.g., a threshold in horizon poloidal flux) that determines jet formation.
  3. [Section III.D and Fig. 8] The horizon poloidal flux oscillates with sign reversals, and the Poynting luminosity decays on a timescale of about 10 s after the peak; the authors note that no quasi-steady magnetosphere forms, possibly because of the simple dynamo modeling. Since long GRBs typically last 10-100 s, the paper should discuss whether an intermittent, polarity-flipping BZ jet with LBZ of order 10^50 erg/s for only about 10 s is compatible with the duration and energetics of typical long GRBs, or whether the late-time suppression is an artifact of the closure. This is directly relevant to the abstract's claim that the jet luminosity is 'suitable for explaining typical long gamma-ray bursts.'
  4. [Section III.E, Fig. 9, and Table III] The nucleosynthesis yields, including the claimed large Zn mass and the weak r-process, depend on low-Ye and high-entropy ejecta components that are not converged. For example, model B12.1.8l ejects no material with Ye less than about 0.35, while the higher-resolution run B12.1.8l-H ejects an appreciable low-Ye component, and the 56Ni mass drops from 1.08 to 0.50 solar masses between these two runs. The authors acknowledge this in the text ('we have to keep in mind that the convergence of the numerical results might be poor for other models as well'), but the abstract and conclusions present the 56Ni, Zn, and r-process results as part of the successful scenario. Please either soften these claims to reflect the resolution sensitivity or demonstrate convergence of the nucleosynthesis-relevant ejecta properties.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (8)] In Eq. (8), the sound speed c_s is a velocity, but the denominator in the second factor is written with units of g/cm^3; it should be cm/s (the text preceding the equation gives c_s = 0.1c = 3 x 10^9 cm/s).
  2. [Section III.A] Typo: 'Poynging flux' should be 'Poynting flux' in the paragraph describing the funnel structure and jet propagation.
  3. [Section III.D] Typo: 'B12.1.8l abd B12.1.8l-H' should be 'B12.1.8l and B12.1.8l-H' in the first paragraph discussing the Poynting flux evolution.
  4. [References] Reference [9] and reference [47] are the same paper (Fujibayashi et al., Phys. Rev. D 109, 023031) and should be consolidated.
  5. [Table I caption] The model-name key '104alpha_d' is ambiguous; it should be written as '10^4 alpha_d' for clarity.
  6. [Table II caption] The caption says 'Poynting luminosity integrated over simulation time,' but the column EBZ is an energy, not a time-integrated luminosity; consider renaming it 'Poynting energy.'

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the dynamo closure is an acknowledged modeling assumption, and the predicted explosion and jet quantities are emergent simulation outputs.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that a weak toroidal seed field, amplified by a prescribed mean-field alpha-Omega dynamo, can build a poloidal field that threads the black hole and launches a Blandford-Znajek jet with an accompanying stellar explosion. The target quantities—explosion energy, ejecta mass, 56Ni mass, and Poynting luminosity—are outputs of the simulations, not inputs. The dynamo parameters (alpha_d, sigma_c, rho_cut) are varied over a small grid (Table I), and the paper explicitly reports that some models do not launch jets (e.g., B12.3.8l-H), so the outcome is not enforced by construction. The dynamo term is taken from the authors' previous work [29], but this is disclosed as a phenomenological model ('we perform axisymmetric resistive magnetohydrodynamics simulations adding a dynamo term'), and plausible parameter values are also supported by external citations [39-41]. The comparison with observed type Ic-BL SNe and with viscous-hydrodynamics simulations is done after the runs, as an external benchmark, not as a fit. The paper also candidly states its limitations, noting that the magnetosphere may be poorly modeled and that a three-dimensional simulation is needed for quantitative results. No step in the derivation reduces, by definition or by parameter fitting, to the inputs. The self-citations are for code, formulation, and initial-data setup, not for the central result itself, and they do not constitute circular justification.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central scenario is carried by a chain of modeling choices rather than by derived equations: 2D axisymmetry forces a phenomenological dynamo closure; the closure parameters (alpha_d, sigma_c, rho_cut) are chosen by hand; and the initial data select one progenitor star, one black-hole spin, and a purely toroidal weak seed field. No new physical entities are proposed. The standard pieces, DD2 EOS, neutrino leakage/M1 transport, and the rNET network, are imported from prior work. These assumptions are all flagged in the text, but they amount to most of the physical input.

free parameters (6)
  • alpha_d (dimensionless dynamo coefficient) = 1e-4 or 3e-4
    Controls the strength of the alpha-Omega dynamo source; chosen from a plausible range and varied across models, with direct effect on jet launch timing and explosion energy.
  • sigma_c (magnetic conductivity) = 1e7, 1e8, or 1e9 s^-1
    Sets the dissipation rate of the magnetic field; varied across models, with lower values delaying or weakening jet launch.
  • rho_cut (dynamo cutoff density) = 1e6 or 1e8 g/cm3
    Suppresses dynamo action in low-density magnetospheric regions via Eq. (2); the high value creates an artificial leftover torus and changes the electron fraction of ejecta.
  • Initial maximum magnetic field Bmax = 1e11 or 1e12 G
    Sets the strength of the purely toroidal seed field in Eq. (4); chosen to be much weaker than the gas pressure, a key modeling assumption.
  • Initial black hole mass and spin = M_BH,0 = 16 Msun, chi_0 = 0.70, envelope mass ~9.5 Msun
    Selected from the AD35 stellar evolution model and the assumption that the black hole forms before the disk; the final ejecta mass and explosion energy depend on this choice.
  • alpha_viscosity in comparison run = 0.03
    Used for the viscous hydrodynamics comparison model; a standard alpha-disk parameter that affects the timing of the viscous explosion.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Axisymmetry with equatorial-plane symmetry
    The 2D setup cannot resolve MRI-driven turbulence in 3D, so a phenomenological dynamo closure is needed; this limitation is acknowledged in Sections II and IV.
  • ad hoc to paper Mean-field alpha-Omega dynamo source term
    Source terms with alpha_d and sigma_c are added to the resistive MHD equations 'phenomenologically' (Sec. II), so the turbulent field amplification that drives the whole scenario is prescribed rather than resolved.
  • ad hoc to paper Density cutoff rho_cut suppresses dynamo in low-density regions
    Equation (2) modifies alpha_d by 1 - exp(-rho/rho_cut), with rho_cut chosen by hand; this artificial cutoff affects low-Ye ejecta and leftover torus mass (Sec. III E).
  • domain assumption Initial data of a spinning BH plus free-falling AD35 envelope
    The system is initialized after black hole formation, before disk formation, using one progenitor model from Ref. [23]; this assumes the collapse history of that model.
  • ad hoc to paper Initial magnetic field is purely toroidal and weak
    The field in Eq. (4) is set to B ~ 1e11-1e12 G, deliberately avoiding any initial poloidal component; this is the hypothesis under test.
  • domain assumption DD2 tabulated equation of state and approximate neutrino transport are adequate
    The EOS and leakage/M1 neutrino scheme are imported from Refs. [36-38]; high-density EOS behavior is said to be unimportant because densities stay below nuclear saturation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Self-consistent scenario for jet and stellar explosion in collapsar: General relativistic magnetohydrodynamics simulation with dynamo." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UFTV7I7U

@misc{pith2026250202077,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Self-consistent scenario for jet and stellar explosion in collapsar: General relativistic magnetohydrodynamics simulation with dynamo},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UFTV7I7U}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.02077}
}
abstract

A resistive magnetohydrodynamics simulation with a dynamo term is performed for modeling the collapsar in full general relativity. As an initial condition, a spinning black hole and infalling stellar matter are modeled based on a stellar evolution result, superimposing a weak toroidal magnetic field. After the growth of a massive torus around the black hole, the magnetic field is amplified in it, developing poloidal fields via dynamo. In an early stage of the torus growth, magnetic fluxes that fall to the vicinity of the central black hole are swallowed by the black hole and global poloidal magnetic fields that can be the source of the Blandford-Znajek mechanism are not developed. However, in a later stage in which the ram pressure of the infalling matter becomes weak, the magnetic field amplified by the black hole spin via the winding becomes large enough to expel the infalling matter by the magnetic pressure, and subsequently, a global poloidal magnetic field that penetrates the black hole is established, launching a jet along the spin axis by the Blandford-Znajek mechanism with the luminosity suitable for explaining typical long gamma-ray bursts. Together with the jet launch, the effectively viscous effect in the inner region of the torus and the magnetocentrifugal effect drive the stellar explosion with the explosion energy comparable to typical or powerful supernovae. We also find large amounts of synthesized $^{56}$Ni and Zn associated with the stellar explosion. In the presence of jet launching, $r$-process elements are weakly synthesized. The numerical results of the explosion energy, ejecta mass, and $^{56}$Ni mass are in a good agreement with those for observed broad-lined type Ic supernovae. Our result illustrates a self-consistent scenario for the gamma-ray-burst-associated broad-lined type Ic supernovae.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.02077 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Snapshots of the rest-mass density (top-left), entropy per baryon (top-right), temperature (bottom-left), and electron [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Left: Evolution of the mass and dimensionless spin of the black holes for models B11.1.8h, B12.1.8h, B12.1.8l, B12.3.8l, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Left: Evolution of the electromagnetic energy for models B11.1.8h, B12.1.8h, B12.1.8l, B12.3.8l, B12.1.7l, and B12.1.9l. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Left: Time evolution of the ejecta mass (top panel) and explosion energy (bottom panel) for all the standard-resolution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Correlation between the ejecta mass and explosion energy (filled markers). The open markers denote the inferred [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Time evolution of the Poynting luminosity (top), the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Mass histogram of electron fraction (top panels), entropy per baryon (middle panels), and cumulative distribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Time evolution of various quantities in the equatorial plane. The vertical axis shows the radial coordinate. Top to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Correlations of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Left: Ejected masses of nuclei in units of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Left: Total neutrino luminosity for selected models, in which the explosions set in at earliest (B12.3.8l), latest [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_13.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Hyperaccreting Magnetised Neutron Stars inside Rotating Massive Envelopes: Low-Power Jets and Precursor Flares

    astro-ph.HE 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    In 2D GRMHD simulations, magnetised neutron stars hyperaccreting inside massive envelopes can halt accretion above B_surf ~2.3e13 G and launch ~1e46 erg/s precursor jets that still cannot unbind the envelope.

  2. Accretion Regimes of Neutrino-Cooled Flows onto Black Holes

    astro-ph.HE 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A 1D relativistic disk model charts the accretion regimes of neutrino-cooled flows and predicts r-process outflows up to black hole masses of about 3000 solar masses.

  3. SACRA-2D: New axisymmetric general relativistic hydrodynamics code with fixed mesh refinement

    astro-ph.HE 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SACRA-2D is a new axisymmetric relativistic hydrodynamics code with the HLLC solver and adaptive mesh refinement, validated by benchmarks showing improved accuracy over the TVDLF solver.

  4. Neutrino pair annihilation driven jets from black-hole torus systems

    astro-ph.HE 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Neutrino pair annihilation in black hole-torus systems launches relativistic fireballs with isotropic energies up to about 10^51 erg and durations around 0.1 s, which can account for faint short GRBs and GRB precursors.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Conditions for nucleosynthesis Before moving onto the nucleosynthesis results, we first review the general trends of physical conditions found in each of our models. Figure 9 shows the distribu- tions of the electron fraction (top) and the entropy per baryon (middle) in the ejecta components which experi- enced the temperature with > 5 GK (here GK= 10 9 K...

  2. [2]

    We use a nuclear re- action network code rNET [54]

    Nucleosynthesis results Based on the thermodynamical histories obtained by the particle tracing method, nucleosynthesis calculations are performed in post-processing. We use a nuclear re- action network code rNET [54]. The network consists of about 6300 nuclear species with atomic number Z = 0– 110, which are connected by relevant reactions. Each nu- cleo...

    2000

  3. [3]

    Failed Supernovae

    A. I. MacFadyen and S. E. Woosley, Collapsars: Gamma- Ray Bursts and Explosions in “Failed Supernovae”, As- trophys. J. 524, 262 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9810274 [astro-ph]

    arXiv 1999

  4. [4]

    S. E. Woosley, Gamma-Ray Bursts from Stellar Mass Accretion Disks around Black Holes, Astrophys. J. 405, 273 (1993)

    1993

  5. [5]

    Paczy´ nski, Are Gamma-Ray Bursts in Star- Forming Regions?, Astrophys

    B. Paczy´ nski, Are Gamma-Ray Bursts in Star- Forming Regions?, Astrophys. J. Lett. 494, L45 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9710086 [astro-ph]

    arXiv 1998

  6. [6]

    R. D. Blandford and R. L. Znajek, Electromagnetic ex- traction of energy from Kerr black holes., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 179, 433 (1977)

    work page 1977

  7. [7]

    Piran, The physics of gamma-ray bursts, Reviews of Modern Physics 76, 1143 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0405503 [astro-ph]

    T. Piran, The physics of gamma-ray bursts, Reviews of Modern Physics 76, 1143 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0405503 [astro-ph]

    arXiv 2004

  8. [8]

    Zhang and P

    B. Zhang and P. Meszaros, Gamma-ray bursts: Progress, problems & prospects, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 19, 2385 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0311321

    arXiv 2004

Show all 84 references
  1. [10]

    Kohri, R

    K. Kohri, R. Narayan, and T. Piran, Neutrino-dominated Accretion and Supernovae, Astrophys. J. 629, 341 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0502470 [astro-ph]

    2005 arXiv

  2. [11]

    O. Just, M. A. Aloy, M. Obergaulinger, and S. Na- gataki, r-process Viable Outflows are Suppressed in Global Alpha-viscosity Models of Collapsar Disks, Astro- phys. J. Lett. 934, L30 (2022), arXiv:2205.14158 [astro- ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  3. [12]

    S. S. Komissarov, Observations of the Blandford-Znajek and the MHD Penrose processes in computer simulations of black hole magnetospheres, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 359, 801 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0501599

    2005 arXiv

  4. [13]

    Dean and R

    C. Dean and R. Fern´ andez, Collapsar disk outflows: Vis- cous hydrodynamic evolution in axisymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 109, 083010 (2024), arXiv:2403.08877 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  5. [14]

    Cano, S.-Q

    Z. Cano, S.-Q. Wang, Z.-G. Dai, and X.-F. Wu, The Ob- server’s Guide to the Gamma-Ray Burst Supernova Con- nection, Advances in Astronomy 2017, 8929054 (2017), arXiv:1604.03549 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  6. [15]

    S. S. Komissarov and M. V. Barkov, Activation of the Blandford-Znajek mechanism in collapsing stars, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.397, 1153 (2009), arXiv:0902.2881 [astro-ph.HE]

    2009 arXiv

  7. [16]

    J. C. McKinney, General relativistic magnetohydrody- namic simulations of jet formation and large-scale propa- gation from black hole accretion systems, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 368, 1561 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0603045

    2006 arXiv

  8. [17]

    M. V. Barkov and S. S. Komissarov, Stellar explosions powered by the Blandford-Znajek mechanism, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 385, L28 (2008), arXiv:0710.2654 [astro- ph]

    2008 arXiv

  9. [18]

    Gottlieb, A

    O. Gottlieb, A. Lalakos, O. Bromberg, M. Liska, and A. Tchekhovskoy, Black hole to breakout: 3D GRMHD simulations of collapsar jets reveal a wide range of tran- sients, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 510, 4962 (2022), arXiv:2109.14619 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  10. [19]

    Tchekhovskoy, R

    A. Tchekhovskoy, R. Narayan, and J. C. McKinney, Effi- cient Generation of Jets from Magnetically Arrested Ac- cretion on a Rapidly Spinning Black Hole, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 418, L79 (2011), arXiv:1108.0412 [astro- ph.HE]

    2011 arXiv

  11. [20]

    Bromberg and A

    O. Bromberg and A. Tchekhovskoy, Relativistic MHD simulations of core-collapse GRB jets: 3D instabilities and magnetic dissipation, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 456, 1739 (2016), arXiv:1508.02721 [astro-ph.HE]

    2016 arXiv

  12. [21]

    Eisenberg, O

    M. Eisenberg, O. Gottlieb, and E. Nakar, Observa- tional signatures of stellar explosions driven by relativis- tic jets, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 517, 582 (2022), arXiv:2201.08432 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  13. [22]

    Tominaga, K

    N. Tominaga, K. Maeda, H. Umeda, K. Nomoto, M. Tanaka, N. Iwamoto, T. Suzuki, and P. A. Maz- zali, The Connection between Gamma-Ray Bursts and Extremely Metal-poor Stars: Black Hole-forming Super- novae with Relativistic Jets, Astrophys. J. Lett.657, L77 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph...

    2007 arXiv

  14. [23]

    Lazzati, B

    D. Lazzati, B. J. Morsony, C. H. Blackwell, and M. C. Begelman, Unifying the Zoo of Jet-driven Stellar Ex- plosions, Astrophys. J. 750, 68 (2012), arXiv:1111.0970 [astro-ph.HE]

    2012 arXiv

  15. [24]

    Narayan, I

    R. Narayan, I. V. Igumenshchev, and M. A. Abramowicz, Magnetically Arrested Disk: an Energetically Efficient Accretion Flow, Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. 55, L69 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0305029 [astro-ph]

    2003 arXiv

  16. [25]

    Shibata, S

    M. Shibata, S. Fujibayashi, A. T.-L. Lam, K. Ioka, and Y. Sekiguchi, Outflow energy and black-hole spin evo- lution in collapsar scenarios, Phys. Rev. D 109, 043051 (2024), arXiv:2309.12086 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  17. [26]

    D. R. Aguilera-Dena, N. Langer, J. Antoniadis, and B. M¨ uller, Precollapse Properties of Superluminous Su- pernovae and Long Gamma-Ray Burst Progenitor Mod- els, Astrophys. J. 901, 114 (2020), arXiv:2008.09132 [astro-ph.SR]

    2020 arXiv

  18. [27]

    Z.-F. Wu, M. Damoulakis, P. Beniamini, and D. Gi- annios, Maximal Jet Energy of Gamma-Ray Bursts through the Blandford-Znajek Mechanism, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2411.12850 (2024), arXiv:2411.12850 [astro- ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  19. [28]

    I. V. Igumenshchev, R. Narayan, and M. A. Abramow- icz, Three-dimensional mhd simulations of radiatively in- efficient accretion flows, Astrophys. J. 592, 1042 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0301402

    2003 arXiv

  20. [29]

    Corsi, A

    A. Corsi, A. Gal-Yam, S. R. Kulkarni, D. A. Frail, P. A. Mazzali, S. B. Cenko, M. M. Kasliwal, Y. Cao, A. Horesh, N. Palliyaguru, D. A. Perley, R. R. Laher, F. Taddia, G. Leloudas, K. Maguire, P. E. Nugent, J. Sollerman, and M. Sullivan, Radio Observations of a Sample of Broad...

    2016 arXiv

  21. [30]

    Hayashi, S

    K. Hayashi, S. Fujibayashi, K. Kiuchi, K. Kyu- toku, Y. Sekiguchi, and M. Shibata, General-relativistic neutrino-radiation magnetohydrodynamic simulation of seconds-long black hole-neutron star mergers, Phys. Rev. D 106, 023008 (2022), arXiv:2111.04621 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  22. [31]

    S. A. Balbus and J. F. Hawley, Instability, turbulence, and enhanced transport in accretion disks, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 1 (1998)

    1998

  23. [32]

    Shibata, S

    M. Shibata, S. Fujibayashi, and Y. Sekiguchi, Long-term evolution of neutron-star merger remnants in general rel- ativistic resistive magnetohydrodynamics with a mean- field dynamo term, Phys. Rev. D 104, 063026 (2021), arXiv:2109.08732 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  24. [33]

    Hayashi, K

    K. Hayashi, K. Kiuchi, K. Kyutoku, Y. Sekiguchi, and M. Shibata, Jet from binary neutron star merger with prompt black hole formation, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2410.10958 (2024), arXiv:2410.10958 [astro- ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  25. [34]

    Hayashi, K

    K. Hayashi, K. Kiuchi, K. Kyutoku, Y. Sekiguchi, and M. Shibata, General-relativistic neutrino-radiation magnetohydrodynamics simulation of seconds-long black hole-neutron star mergers: Dependence on the initial magnetic field strength, configuration, and neutron-star equation...

    2023 arXiv

  26. [35]

    Kiuchi, S

    K. Kiuchi, S. Fujibayashi, K. Hayashi, K. Kyutoku, Y. Sekiguchi, and M. Shibata, Self-Consistent Picture of the Mass Ejection from a One Second Long Binary Neutron Star Merger Leaving a Short-Lived Remnant in a General-Relativistic Neutrino-Radiation Magneto- hydrodynamic Simu...

    2023 arXiv

  27. [36]

    Banik, M

    S. Banik, M. Hempel, and D. Bandyopadhyay, New Hy- peron Equations of State for Supernovae and Neutron Stars in Density-dependent Hadron Field Theory, As- trophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 214, 22 (2014), arXiv:1404.6173 [astro-ph.HE]

    2014 arXiv

  28. [37]

    D. Issa, O. Gottlieb, B. Metzger, J. Jacquemin-Ide, M. Liska, F. Foucart, G. Halevi, and A. Tchekhovskoy, Magnetically-Driven Neutron-Rich Ejecta Unleashed: Global 3D Neutrino-GRMHD Simulations of Col- lapsars Reveal the Conditions for r-process Nucle- osynthesis, arXiv e-prin...

    2024 arXiv

  29. [38]

    Shibata, S

    M. Shibata, S. Fujibayashi, and Y. Sekiguchi, Long- term evolution of a merger-remnant neutron star in general relativistic magnetohydrodynamics: Effect of magnetic winding, Phys. Rev. D 103, 043022 (2021), arXiv:2102.01346 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  30. [39]

    Gressel and M

    O. Gressel and M. E. Pessah, Characterizing the Mean- field Dynamo in Turbulent Accretion Disks, Astrophys. J. 810, 59 (2015), arXiv:1507.08634 [astro-ph.HE]

    2015 arXiv

  31. [40]

    Sekiguchi, K

    Y. Sekiguchi, K. Kiuchi, K. Kyutoku, and M. Shibata, Dynamical mass ejection from binary neutron star merg- ers: Radiation-hydrodynamics study in general relativ- ity, Phys. Rev. D 91, 064059 (2015), arXiv:1502.06660 [astro-ph.HE]

    2015 arXiv

  32. [41]

    Fujibayashi, Y

    S. Fujibayashi, Y. Sekiguchi, K. Kiuchi, and M. Shi- bata, Properties of Neutrino-driven Ejecta from the Rem- nant of a Binary Neutron Star Merger: Pure Radia- tion Hydrodynamics Case, Astrophys. J.846, 114 (2017), arXiv:1703.10191 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  33. [42]

    O’Connor and C

    E. O’Connor and C. D. Ott, Black Hole Formation in Failing Core-Collapse Supernovae, Astrophys. J. 730, 70 (2011), arXiv:1010.5550 [astro-ph.HE]

    2011 arXiv

  34. [43]

    Reboul-Salze, J

    A. Reboul-Salze, J. Guilet, R. Raynaud, and M. Bugli, A global model of the magnetorotational instability in pro- toneutron stars, Astron. Astrophys. 645, A109 (2021), arXiv:2005.03567 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  35. [44]

    Kiuchi, A

    K. Kiuchi, A. Reboul-Salze, M. Shibata, and Y. Sekiguchi, A large-scale magnetic field produced by a solar-like dynamo in binary neutron star merg- ers, Nature Astron. 8, 298 (2024), arXiv:2306.15721 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  36. [45]

    Fujibayashi, M

    S. Fujibayashi, M. Shibata, S. Wanajo, K. Kiuchi, K. Kyutoku, and Y. Sekiguchi, Viscous evolution of a massive disk surrounding stellar-mass black holes in full general relativity, Phys. Rev. D 102, 123014 (2020), arXiv:2009.03895 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  37. [46]

    Shibata, Numerical Relativity (World Scientific Pub- lishing Company, 2016)

    M. Shibata, Numerical Relativity (World Scientific Pub- lishing Company, 2016)

    2016

  38. [47]

    Fujibayashi, M

    S. Fujibayashi, M. Shibata, S. Wanajo, K. Kiuchi, K. Kyutoku, and Y. Sekiguchi, Mass ejection from disks surrounding a low-mass black hole: Viscous neutrino-radiation hydrodynamics simulation in full gen- eral relativity, Phys. Rev. D 101, 083029 (2020), arXiv:2001.04467 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  39. [48]

    Liang, J

    E.-W. Liang, J. L. Racusin, B. Zhang, B.-B. Zhang, and D. N. Burrows, A Comprehensive Analysis of Swift XRT Data. III. Jet Break Candidates in X-Ray and Optical Afterglow Light Curves, Astrophys. J. 675, 528 (2008), arXiv:0708.2942 [astro-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  40. [49]

    Taddia, J

    F. Taddia, J. Sollerman, C. Fremling, C. Barbarino, E. Karamehmetoglu, I. Arcavi, S. B. Cenko, A. V. Fil- ippenko, A. Gal-Yam, D. Hiramatsu, G. Hosseinzadeh, D. A. Howell, S. R. Kulkarni, R. Laher, R. Lunnan, F. Masci, P. E. Nugent, A. Nyholm, D. A. Perley, R. Quimby, and J. M...

    2019

  41. [50]

    Fujibayashi, A

    S. Fujibayashi, A. T.-L. Lam, M. Shibata, and Y. Sekiguchi, Supernovalike explosions of massive rotat- ing stars from disks surrounding a black hole, Phys. Rev. D 109, 023031 (2024), arXiv:2309.02161 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  42. [51]

    I. M. Christie, A. Lalakos, A. Tchekhovskoy, R. Fern´ andez, F. Foucart, E. Quataert, and D. Kasen, The role of magnetic field geometry in the evolution of neutron star merger accretion discs, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 490, 4811 (2019), arXiv:1907.02079 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  43. [52]

    Crosato Menegazzi, S

    L. Crosato Menegazzi, S. Fujibayashi, M. Shibata, A. Be- tranhandy, and K. Takahashi, Variety of disc wind-driven explosions in massive rotating stars. II. Dependence on the progenitor, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2411.04221 (2024), arXiv:2411.04221 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  44. [53]

    Beckwith, J

    K. Beckwith, J. F. Hawley, and J. H. Krolik, The In- fluence of Magnetic Field Geometry on the Evolution of Black Hole Accretion Flows: Similar Disks, Dras- tically Different Jets, Astrophys. J. 678, 1180 (2008), arXiv:0709.3833 [astro-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  45. [54]

    Wanajo, Physical Conditions for the r-process

    S. Wanajo, Physical Conditions for the r-process. I. Ra- dioactive Energy Sources of Kilonovae, Astrophys. J. 868, 65 (2018), arXiv:1808.03763 [astro-ph.HE]

    2018 arXiv

  46. [55]

    Fujibayashi, S

    S. Fujibayashi, S. Wanajo, K. Kiuchi, K. Kyutoku, Y. Sekiguchi, and M. Shibata, Postmerger Mass Ejection of Low-mass Binary Neutron Stars, Astrophys. J. 901, 22 122 (2020), arXiv:2007.00474 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  47. [56]

    S. E. Woosley, A. Heger, and T. A. Weaver, The evolu- tion and explosion of massive stars, Reviews of Modern Physics 74, 1015 (2002)

    2002

  48. [57]

    B. W. Grefenstette et al., Asymmetries in core-collapse supernovae from maps of radioactive44Ti in CassiopeiaA, Nature 506, 339 (2014), arXiv:1403.4978 [astro-ph.HE]

    2014 arXiv

  49. [58]

    I. R. Seitenzahl, F. X. Timmes, and G. Magkotsios, The light curve of SN 1987A revisited: constraining produc- tion masses of radioactive nuclides, Astrophys. J. 792, 10 (2014), arXiv:1408.5986 [astro-ph.SR]

    2014 arXiv

  50. [59]

    S. A. Grebenev, A. A. Lutovinov, S. S. Tsygankov, and C. Winkler, Hard X-ray emission lines from the decay of Ti-44 in the remnant of supernova 1987A, Nature 490, 373 (2012), arXiv:1211.2656 [astro-ph.HE]

    2012 arXiv

  51. [60]

    Note that the dominance ofα elements for A ≤ 40 reflects the adopted initial composition of the pre-collapsing star, not due to the result of explosive nucleosynthesis

    (scaled to match the result for B11.1.8h at A = 90). Note that the dominance ofα elements for A ≤ 40 reflects the adopted initial composition of the pre-collapsing star, not due to the result of explosive nucleosynthesis. We find that the presence of a jet (see the last column...

  52. [61]

    J. D. Kurfess, W. N. Johnson, R. L. Kinzer, R. A. Kroeger, M. S. Strickman, J. E. Grove, M. D. Leising, D. D. Clayton, D. A. Grabelsky, W. R. Purcell, M. P. Ulmer, R. A. Cameron, and G. V. Jung, Oriented Scin- tillation Spectrometer Experiment Observations of 57Co in SN 1987A,...

    1992

  53. [62]

    Clocchiatti, N

    A. Clocchiatti, N. B. Suntzeff, R. Covarrubias, and P. Candia, The Ultimate Light Curve of SN 1998bw/GRB 980425, Astron. J. 141, 163 (2011), arXiv:1106.1695 [astro-ph.HE]

    2011 arXiv

  54. [63]

    Prantzos, C

    N. Prantzos, C. Abia, S. Cristallo, M. Limongi, and A. Chieffi, Chemical evolution with rotating massive star yields II. A new assessment of the solar s- and r-process components, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.491, 1832 (2020), arXiv:1911.02545 [astro-ph.GA]

    2020 arXiv

  55. [64]

    A. P. Ji et al., Spectacular Nucleosynthesis from Early Massive Stars, Astrophys. J. Lett. 961, L41 (2024), arXiv:2401.02484 [astro-ph.SR]

    2024 arXiv

  56. [65]

    D. M. Siegel, J. Barnes, and B. D. Metzger, Collapsars as a major source of r-process elements, Nature (London) 569, 241 (2019), arXiv:1810.00098 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  57. [66]

    R. D. Hoffman, S. E. Woosley, and Y. Z. Qian, Nucle- osynthesis in neutrino driven winds: 2. Implications for heavy element synthesis, Astrophys. J. 482, 951 (1997), arXiv:astro-ph/9611097

    1997 arXiv

  58. [67]

    Kobayashi, H

    C. Kobayashi, H. Umeda, K. Nomoto, N. Tominaga, and T. Ohkubo, Galactic chemical evolution: Car- bon through Zinc, Astrophys. J. 653, 1145 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0608688

    2006 arXiv

  59. [68]

    Hirai, T

    Y. Hirai, T. R. Saitoh, Y. Ishimaru, and S. Wanajo, En- richment of Zinc in galactic chemodynamical evolution models, Astrophys. J. 855, 63 (2018), arXiv:1801.08141 [astro-ph.GA]

    2018 arXiv

  60. [69]

    Umeda and K

    H. Umeda and K. Nomoto, Nucleosynthesis of zinc and iron-peak elements in pop III type II supernovae: com- parison with abundances of very metal-poor halo stars, Astrophys. J. 565, 385 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0103241

    2002 arXiv

  61. [70]

    Tominaga, H

    N. Tominaga, H. Umeda, and K. Nomoto, Supernova Nu- cleosynthesis in Population III 13-50 Solar Mass Stars and Abundance Patterns of Extremely Metal-Poor Stars, Astrophys. J. 660, 516 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0701381

    2007 arXiv

  62. [71]

    Wanajo, H.-T

    S. Wanajo, H.-T. Janka, and B. M¨ uller, Electron-capture Supernovae as The Origin of Elements Beyond Iron, Astrophys. J. 726, L15 (2011), arXiv:1009.1000 [astro- ph.SR]

    2011 arXiv

  63. [72]

    Wanajo, B

    S. Wanajo, B. M¨ uller, H.-T. Janka, and A. Heger, Nu- cleosynthesis in the Innermost Ejecta of Neutrino-driven Supernova Explosions in Two Dimensions, Astrophys. J. 852, 40 (2018), arXiv:1701.06786 [astro-ph.SR]

    2018 arXiv

  64. [73]

    A. J. Levan et al. (JWST), Heavy-element production in a compact object merger observed by JWST, Nature 626, 737 (2024), arXiv:2307.02098 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  65. [74]

    Hotokezaka, M

    K. Hotokezaka, M. Tanaka, D. Kato, and G. Gaigalas, Tellurium emission line in kilonova AT 2017gfo, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 526, L155 (2023), arXiv:2307.00988 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  66. [75]

    J. C. Rastinejad et al., A Hubble Space Telescope Search for r-Process Nucleosynthesis in Gamma-Ray Burst Su- pernovae, Astrophys. J.968, 14 (2024), arXiv:2312.04630 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  67. [76]

    Honda, W

    S. Honda, W. Aoki, Y. Ishimaru, S. Wanajo, and S. G. Ryan, Neutron-Capture Elements in the Very Metal Poor Star HD 122563, Astrophys. J. 643, 1180 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0602107 [astro-ph]

    2006 arXiv

  68. [77]

    Janka, Explosion Mechanisms of Core-Collapse Su- pernovae, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 62, 407 (2012), arXiv:1206.2503 [astro-ph.SR]

    H.-T. Janka, Explosion Mechanisms of Core-Collapse Su- pernovae, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 62, 407 (2012), arXiv:1206.2503 [astro-ph.SR]

    2012 arXiv

  69. [78]

    Sumiyoshi, S

    K. Sumiyoshi, S. Yamada, H. Suzuki, and S. Chiba, Neu- trino Signals from the Formation of a Black Hole: A Probe of the Equation of State of Dense Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 091101 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0608509 [astro-ph]

    2006 arXiv

  70. [79]

    Kuroda and M

    T. Kuroda and M. Shibata, Failed supernova simulations beyond black hole formation, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 526, 152 (2023), arXiv:2307.06192 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  71. [80]

    Fujibayashi, Y

    S. Fujibayashi, Y. Sekiguchi, M. Shibata, and S. Wanajo, Collapse of Rotating Massive Stars Leading to Black Hole Formation and Energetic Supernovae, Astrophys. J.956, 100 (2023), arXiv:2212.03958 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  72. [81]

    Epstein, The generation of gravitational radiation by escaping supernova neutrinos., Astrophys

    R. Epstein, The generation of gravitational radiation by escaping supernova neutrinos., Astrophys. J. 223, 1037 (1978)

    1978

  73. [82]

    M. S. Turner, Gravitational radiation from supernova neutrino bursts, Nature (London) 274, 565 (1978)

    1978

  74. [83]

    M¨ uller, H.-T

    B. M¨ uller, H.-T. Janka, and A. Marek, A New Multi- dimensional General Relativistic Neutrino Hydrodynam- ics Code for Core-collapse Supernovae. II. Relativistic Explosion Models of Core-collapse Supernovae, Astro- phys. J. 756, 84 (2012), arXiv:1202.0815 [astro-ph.SR]

    2012 arXiv

  75. [84]

    Kawamura et al., Current status of space gravitational wave antenna DECIGO and B-DECIGO, PTEP 2021, 05A105 (2021), arXiv:2006.13545 [gr-qc]

    S. Kawamura et al., Current status of space gravitational wave antenna DECIGO and B-DECIGO, PTEP 2021, 05A105 (2021), arXiv:2006.13545 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  76. [85]

    Corsi, A

    A. Corsi, A. Y. Q. Ho, S. B. Cenko, S. R. Kulkarni, S. Anand, S. Yang, J. Sollerman, G. P. Srinivasaraga- van, C. M. B. Omand, A. Balasubramanian, D. A. Frail, C. Fremling, D. A. Perley, Y. Yao, A. S. Dahiwale, K. De, A. Dugas, M. Hankins, J. Jencson, M. M. Kasliwal, A. Tzanid...

    2023 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.