Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Estimating Epistemic and Aleatoric Uncertainty with a Single Model

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.03478 v2 pith:UGPYXND4 submitted 2024-02-05 cs.LG cs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.CV
keywords uncertaintyaleatoricepistemicmodelmodelsaccuratelyapproachdiffusion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Estimating and disentangling epistemic uncertainty, uncertainty that is reducible with more training data, and aleatoric uncertainty, uncertainty that is inherent to the task at hand, is critically important when applying machine learning to high-stakes applications such as medical imaging and weather forecasting. Conditional diffusion models' breakthrough ability to accurately and efficiently sample from the posterior distribution of a dataset now makes uncertainty estimation conceptually straightforward: One need only train and sample from a large ensemble of diffusion models. Unfortunately, training such an ensemble becomes computationally intractable as the complexity of the model architecture grows. In this work we introduce a new approach to ensembling, hyper-diffusion models (HyperDM), which allows one to accurately estimate both epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty with a single model. Unlike existing single-model uncertainty methods like Monte-Carlo dropout and Bayesian neural networks, HyperDM offers prediction accuracy on par with, and in some cases superior to, multi-model ensembles. Furthermore, our proposed approach scales to modern network architectures such as Attention U-Net and yields more accurate uncertainty estimates compared to existing methods. We validate our method on two distinct real-world tasks: x-ray computed tomography reconstruction and weather temperature forecasting.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. EMoE: Training-Free Expert Disagreement for Uncertainty-Aware Text-to-Image Diffusion

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Expert disagreement inside pretrained MoE diffusion models, measured as latent variance at the first denoising step, gives a training-free prompt uncertainty signal that correlates with text-image alignment across languages.

  2. Towards Understanding and Quantifying Uncertainty for Text-to-Image Generation

    cs.AI 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    PUNC scores text-to-image uncertainty by comparing the prompt with an LVLM caption of the generated image, and this text-space similarity outperforms image-space baselines for OOD and ambiguous prompts.

Pith tools