Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

AutoTAMP: Autoregressive Task and Motion Planning with LLMs as Translators and Checkers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.06531 v3 pith:UGUHQYA4 submitted 2023-06-10 cs.RO cs.CLcs.HC

classification cs.ROcs.CLcs.HC
keywords tasklanguagecomplexllmsmotionnaturalplanplanning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

For effective human-robot interaction, robots need to understand, plan, and execute complex, long-horizon tasks described by natural language. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have shown promise for translating natural language into robot action sequences for complex tasks. However, existing approaches either translate the natural language directly into robot trajectories or factor the inference process by decomposing language into task sub-goals and relying on a motion planner to execute each sub-goal. When complex environmental and temporal constraints are involved, inference over planning tasks must be performed jointly with motion plans using traditional task-and-motion planning (TAMP) algorithms, making factorization into subgoals untenable. Rather than using LLMs to directly plan task sub-goals, we instead perform few-shot translation from natural language task descriptions to an intermediate task representation that can then be consumed by a TAMP algorithm to jointly solve the task and motion plan. To improve translation, we automatically detect and correct both syntactic and semantic errors via autoregressive re-prompting, resulting in significant improvements in task completion. We show that our approach outperforms several methods using LLMs as planners in complex task domains. See our project website https://yongchao98.github.io/MIT-REALM-AutoTAMP/ for prompts, videos, and code.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Weights or Skills? A Survey of Robot-Learning Techniques: from Action-Predicting Weights to Robots that Write their Own Skills

    cs.RO 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A taxonomy of robot learning on a weights-versus-skills axis, with a five-rung self-improvement ladder whose top cell (feedback plus memory plus search) holds only a few recent systems.

  2. FEAST: A Flexible Mealtime-Assistance System Towards In-the-Wild Personalization

    cs.RO 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    FEAST is a mealtime assistance robot that uses LLM-editable behavior trees and modular tools to let care recipients personalize feeding, drinking, and mouth wiping in real home settings.

  3. Air-Ground Collaboration for Language-Specified Missions in Unknown Environments

    cs.RO 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A drone and a ground robot coordinated by an LLM planner over an intermittently shared semantic map complete seven natural-language missions in unknown outdoor environments.

Pith tools