Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation via Class-Balanced Self-Training

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1810.07911 v2 pith:UI6VIBA7 submitted 2018-10-18 cs.CV cs.LGcs.MM

classification cs.CVcs.LGcs.MM
keywords domainlabelsself-trainingdataperformancesegmentationsemantictarget
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent deep networks achieved state of the art performance on a variety of semantic segmentation tasks. Despite such progress, these models often face challenges in real world `wild tasks' where large difference between labeled training/source data and unseen test/target data exists. In particular, such difference is often referred to as `domain gap', and could cause significantly decreased performance which cannot be easily remedied by further increasing the representation power. Unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) seeks to overcome such problem without target domain labels. In this paper, we propose a novel UDA framework based on an iterative self-training procedure, where the problem is formulated as latent variable loss minimization, and can be solved by alternatively generating pseudo labels on target data and re-training the model with these labels. On top of self-training, we also propose a novel class-balanced self-training framework to avoid the gradual dominance of large classes on pseudo-label generation, and introduce spatial priors to refine generated labels. Comprehensive experiments show that the proposed methods achieve state of the art semantic segmentation performance under multiple major UDA settings.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Position: Stop Reactively Patching Your Model Every Time and Start Proactive Test-Driven AI Development

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    In a stylized model, a proactive flywheel that fixes whole groups of related scenarios needs Θ(K log K) update rounds versus Θ(M log M) for reactive patching.

Pith tools